1
|
Peng J, Hao D, Yang L, Du M, Song X, Jiang H, Zhang Y, Zheng D. Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest. Biocybern Biomed Eng 2020; 40:352-362. [PMID: 32308250 PMCID: PMC7153772 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbe.2019.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Developing a computational method for recognizing preterm delivery is important for timely diagnosis and treatment of preterm delivery. The main aim of this study was to evaluate electrohysterogram (EHG) signals recorded at different gestational weeks for recognizing the preterm delivery using random forest (RF). EHG signals from 300 pregnant women were divided into two groups depending on when the signals were recorded: i) preterm and term delivery with EHG recorded before the 26th week of gestation (denoted by PE and TE group), and ii) preterm and term delivery with EHG recorded during or after the 26th week of gestation (denoted by PL and TL group). 31 linear features and nonlinear features were derived from each EHG signal, and then compared comprehensively within PE and TE group, and PL and TL group. After employing the adaptive synthetic sampling approach and six-fold cross-validation, the accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were applied to evaluate RF classification. For PL and TL group, RF achieved the ACC of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.89, specificity of 0.97, and AUC of 0.80. Similarly, their corresponding values were 0.92, 0.88, 0.96 and 0.88 for PE and TE group, indicating that RF could be used to recognize preterm delivery effectively with EHG signals recorded before the 26th week of gestation.
Collapse
Key Words
- ACC, accuracy
- ADASYN, adaptive synthetic sampling approach
- ANN, artificial neural network
- AR, auto-regressive model
- AUC, the area under the curve
- CorrDim, correlation dimension
- DT, decision tree
- EHG, electrohysterogram
- Electrohysterogram (EHG)
- Feature extraction
- Gestational week
- IUPC, intrauterine pressure catheter
- K-NN, K-nearest
- LDA, linear discriminant analysis
- LE, Lyapunov exponent
- MDF, median frequency
- MNF, mean frequency
- PE, preterm delivery before the 26th week of gestation
- PF, peak frequency
- PL, preterm delivery after the 26th week of gestation
- Preterm delivery
- QDA, quadratic discriminant analysis
- RF, random forest
- RMS, root mean square
- ROC, the receiver operating characteristic curve
- Random forest (RF).
- SD, standard deviation
- SE, energy values in signal
- SM, maximum values in signal
- SS, singular values in signal
- SV, variance values in signal
- SVM, support vector machine
- SampEn, sample entropy
- TE, term delivery before the 26th week of gestation
- TL, term delivery after the 26th week of gestation
- TOCO, tocodynamometer
- TPEHG, term-preterm electrohysterogram
- Tr, time reversibility
- τz, zero-crossing
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Peng
- College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China
| | - Dongmei Hao
- College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Yang
- College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China
| | - Mengqing Du
- College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Song
- College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China
| | - Hongqing Jiang
- Beijing Haidian Maternal and Children Health Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yunhan Zhang
- College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China
| | - Dingchang Zheng
- Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Faculty of Health and Life Science, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|