Sub-chronic exposure to paroxetine disrupts ecologically relevant behaviours in fish

The functional conservation of important selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) targets in non-target organisms raises concerns about their potential adverse effects on the ecosystems. Although the environmental levels of SSRIs like paroxetine (PAR) have risen, the knowledge regarding the effects of long-term exposure to PAR is limited. This study investigated the impact of sub-chronic exposure (21 days) to two sub-lethal concentrations of PAR (40 and 400 μg/L) on the behaviour of adult zebrafish in different scenarios: basal activity (under dark and light conditions), stress response (evoked by sudden light transitions) and stress response recovery. A new framework was employed for the integrative study of fish's swimming performance based on their innate ability to respond to light shifts. Several swimming-associated parameters (e.g., total swimming distance, time of inactivity, swimming angles) and thigmotaxis were monitored for an integrated analysis in each scenario. Data revealed reduced swimming activity, impaired behavioural response to stress and alterations in stress recovery of PAR-exposed fish. An anxiolytic effect was particularly noticeable in fish basal swimming activity in the dark at 400 μg/L and in the behavioural response to stress (from dark to light) and stress recovery (from light to dark) for organisms exposed to 40 μg/L. The detected PAR-induced behavioural modifications suggest a disruption of brain glucocorticoid signalling that may have implications at the individual level (e.g., changing behavioural responses to predators), with potential repercussions on the population and community levels. Therefore, the applied protocol proved sensitive in detecting behavioural changes induced by PAR.

Choosing among second-generation antidepressant treatments for depressed patients with cardiac diseases

Objectives: The present paper aimed to assist physicians in the accurate choice among second-generation agents (SGAs) for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: We reviewed the published pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) clinical data that report potential -or absence of- drug interactions between second-generation agents (SGAs) and CVD drugs most commonly used in cardiology, including antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants, statins, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, diuretics and the antiarrhythmic drugs amiodarone and digoxin. We also reviewed the cardiovascular safety profile that has been published for each class of SGAs and side effects reported by patients with CVD. Results: Most relevant PK/PD data about SGAs and CVD drugs are based on small studies or detailed case reports. In many cases, the drug interactions are at most assessed in healthy volunteers so that the clinical relevance of findings needs further investigation in patients with CVD. Case reports of serious, sometimes fatal reactions due to concomitant administration of certain drugs require careful consideration. The major cardiac side effects of SGAs include HR increase, postural hypotension and slight prolongation of the intraventricular conduction time and QT interval. On normal dosage of antidepressants, both advanced heart block and ventricular arrhythmias could occur in patients with severe heart disease, together with clinically important loss of myocardial contractile force. Conclusions: Data reported in the present review should help physicians about their decision-making processes that govern SGAs use in CVD patients.

Efficacy and safety of levomilnacipran, vilazodone and vortioxetine compared with other second-generation antidepressants for major depressive disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Second-generation antidepressants dominate the medical management of major depressive disorder (MDD). Levomilnacipran, vilazodone and vortioxetine are the latest therapeutic options approved for the treatment of MDD. This systematic review aims to compare the benefits and harms of vilazodone, levomilnacipran, and vortioxetine with one another and other second-generation antidepressants.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases up to September 2017 and reviewed reference lists and pharmaceutical dossiers to detect published and unpublished studies. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full text articles, and rated the risk of bias of included studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies including adult outpatients with MDD were eligible for inclusion. We conducted network meta-analyses on response to treatment using frequentist multivariate meta-analyses models. Placebo- and active-controlled trials were eligible for network meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies met our inclusion criteria. Direct comparisons were limited to vilazodone versus citalopram, and vortioxetine versus duloxetine, paroxetine, or venlafaxine XR (extended release). Results of head-to-head trials and network meta-analyses, overall, indicated similar efficacy among levomilnacipran, vilazodone, or vortioxetine and other second-generation antidepressants. Although rates of overall adverse events and discontinuation due to adverse events were similar, RCTs reported several differences in specific adverse events. For most outcomes the strength of evidence was low.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations are the focus of literature searches on studies published in English, possible reporting biases, and general methodological limitations of network meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the available evidence does not indicate greater benefits or fewer harms of levomilnacipran, vilazodone, and vortioxetine compared with other second-generation antidepressants.