1
|
Luo C, Qin SX, Wang QY, Li YF, Qu XL, Yue C, Hu L, Sheng ZF, Wang XB, Wan XM. Cost-effectiveness analysis of five drugs for treating postmenopausal women in the United States with osteoporosis and a very high fracture risk. J Endocrinol Invest 2023; 46:367-379. [PMID: 36044169 PMCID: PMC9428883 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-022-01910-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Five strategies were recommended by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) guidelines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) patients with a very high fracture risk. We aimed to assess their cost-effectiveness in the United States (US). METHODS A microsimulation Markov model was created to compare the cost-effectiveness of five treatment strategies, including zoledronate, denosumab, abaloparatide, teriparatide, and romosozumab in PMO patients with a recent fracture from the healthcare perspective of the US. The data used in the model were obtained from published studies or online resources. Base-case analysis, one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) and probability sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted for 65-, 70-, 75-, and 80-year-old patients. RESULTS In base case, at 65 years, zoledronate was the cheapest strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER, which represent incremental costs per QALY gained) of denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab against zoledronate were $13,020/QALY (quality-adjusted years), $477,331 /QALY, $176,287/QALY, and $98,953/QALY, respectively. Under a willing-to-pay (WTP, which means the highest price a consumer will pay for one unit of a good of service) threshold of $150,000/QALY, denosumab and romosozumab were cost-effective against zoledronate. The PSA results showed that denosumab was the most cost-effective option with WTP thresholds of $50,000/QALY, $100,000/QALY and $150,000/QALY. The results were similar in other age groups. The DSA results indicated that the most common parameters that have important influence on the outcome were drug persistence, incidence of adverse events, the efficacy of drugs on hip fractures and the cost of the drug. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Among PMO patients with a very high fracture risk in the US, zoledronate is the cheapest strategy and denosumab is the most cost-effective choice among these five strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Luo
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - S-X Qin
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Q-Y Wang
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Y-F Li
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - X-L Qu
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - C Yue
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - L Hu
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Z-F Sheng
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
| | - X-B Wang
- Divisions of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - X-M Wan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|