Prevalence of hepatitis C, hepatitis B and HIV and their therapeutic management in a French public psychiatric hospital

INTRODUCTION

Several studies suggest that the prevalence of hepatitis C, hepatitis B and HIV are higher in psychiatric patients than in the general population; however, few French studies have been published. The aims of this study were to determine the seroprevalence of the three viruses, describe the profile of infected patients and evaluate the initiation of antiviral treatment in a population of patients hospitalized in a psychiatric hospital.

METHOD

Between January and October 2020, screening for hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus and HIV was systematically offered to all patients admitted to the intersectoral reception and orientation unit of a psychiatric hospital. If serology was positive, viral load was automatically determined from the same blood sample. As direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are not financed "in addition" to hospital charges, it was decided a priori to start treatment for HCV immediately before discharge.

RESULTS

Between January 7 and October 1, 2020, 407 patients accepted screening. Of these patients, 17 (4.2%; 95% CI: 2.2-6.1%) were anti-HCV positive and two were anti-HIV+/anti-HCV- (0.49%). HCV RNA was detectable in 9/17 anti-HCV+ patients, with a prevalence of infection of 2.2% (CI: 0.8-3.6%). Drug use was identified in 16 anti-HCV+ patients (94%), ten with active drug use. Of the nine viraemic patients, only four received a prescription for DAA treatment at the end of hospitalization, and only one was followed up by his general practitioner with the confirmation of virological cure three months after treatment cessation. No patient tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen, but 3% had serological markers indicating HBV past infection. The anti-HBV vaccination coverage rate was only 39% in the entire population and only 41% for patients with a history of drug use.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that the prevalence of HCV infection is significantly higher in the psychiatric population than in the general population. By far, the main risk factor for HCV infection is drug use. This justifies the systematic performance of regular screening in this population. The way in which DAAs are financed in psychiatric hospitals seems to be a major obstacle to the initiation of treatment for chronic HCV infection during hospitalization and therefore to the elimination of HCV infection in the psychiatric population.

Prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis B and C among hemodialysis patients in Tunisia

OBJECTIVE

Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of infection by hepatitis C and B viruses, which are significant causes of mortality and morbidity. Prevention of their transmission in hemodialysis units remains a challenge worldwide. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of these two infections and to explore major risk factors among patients on chronic hemodialysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of 109 hemodialysis patients (mean duration of hemodialysis of seven years) between 2012 and 2014 in a Teaching Hospital of Monastir, Tunisia. Hepatitis B and C serological markers were searched for using a chemiluminescent assay. Genome detection was performed using a commercially available quantitative real-time PCR test.

RESULTS

A total of 109 hemodialysis patients were enrolled (75 males and 34 females). Ages ranged from 21 to 81 years. Six (5.5%) of these 109 patients had HBV infection defined by a positive HBsAg in four (3.7%) patients and by a detectable DNA associated with an "isolated anti-HBc" profile in the remaining two patients. Hepatitis C was observed in eight patients (7.3%) and five of them had detectable RNA. Hemodialysis duration ˃5years was the main risk factor for hepatitis C infection (P=0.01; OR: 3.11; 95% CI [1.57-13.71]).

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirm the downward trend of the prevalence of both hepatitis B and C infections among Tunisian hemodialysis patients. Hemodialysis duration remains the main risk factor for hepatitis C infection. Occult hepatitis B infection should be suspected and investigated, especially among patients with an "isolated anti-HBc" profile.

[Management of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection in chronic kidney failure]

Chronic infections by hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) result in diagnosis and therapeutic issues in dialysis and kidney recipients patients. The exposure to nosocomial, including blood transfusion, risk explains the high prevalence of HBV and HCV infection in this setting. Chronic infection reduces the survival of both patients and allografts, including a specific risk of de novo glomerulonephritis. Cirrhosis was considered as a contra-indication to renal transplantation given the high risk of decompensation and death, questionning the indication of a combined liver and kidney transplantation. Thus, it is mandatory to screen HBV and HCV markers in all dialysis patients, whether or not they are candidates to transplantation. Liver biopsy allows evaluating the severity of the liver disease since the noninvasive markers of fibrosis appear to be less accurate in "renal" patients than in the general population and to better define antiviral therapeutic indications. HCV treatment was mainly based on pegylated interferon α (and low doses of ribavirin), which is contra-indicated in kidney recipients given the risk of graft rejection; HCV treatment is now based on the use of oral direct acting antivirals, which are very potent and well tolerated. HBV replication is now easily suppressed by second-generation nucleos(t)tidic analogues (entecavir and tenofovir), which will be indicated in all the dialysis patients with significant fibrosis (F2,3 or 4 according to the Metavir scoring system) and in any candidate to renal transplantation and to any HBsAg-positive kidney recipients. The best treatment remains preventive by anti-HBV vaccination for HBV and by the respect of universal hygiene rules for HCV.

Treatment of hepatitis C: perspectives

The treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has significantly improved in the last 2 decades. The association of pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin (PR) has allowed a sustained virologic response (SVR) for nearly 15 years i.e. a viral cure of the infection for 45% of genotype 1-, 65% of genotype 4-, 70% of genotype 3- and around 85% of genotype 2-infected patients. A better understanding of the HCV life cycle has led to the development of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) targeted against viral proteins (NS3/4A protease, NS5B polymerase with nucleotide and non-nucleotide inhibitors, NS5A viral replication complex). The combination of first-generation protease inhibitors with PR demonstrated a high antiviral effectiveness (75% of SVR but restricted to genotypes 1) with substantial adverse effects for the first-generation protease inhibitors, which obtained market approval in 2011 (telaprevir and boceprevir), recommendations for use in HCV monoinfected patients in 2012, and in HCV/HIV coinfected in 2013. Then, the combination of second-generation protease inhibitors with PR increased SVR rates from 75 to 90%, while reducing treatment duration, adverse effects, and the number of pills. The next step will be using an interferon and ribavirin-free combination of DAAs; it should become the standard of care in 2015. These excellent results in "easy-to-treat" patients and in small populations in the first studies were confirmed in phase III studies and in "difficult-to-treat" patients (treatment-- especially protease inhibitors--previously treated patients, cirrhotic patients, liver and renal transplant patients, HIV coinfected patients, and multi-drug treated patients, at increased risk of drug interaction). The high antiviral potency of these new combinations has changed the definition of "difficult-to-treat patients". These unique achievements in drug history make any previous publication on hepatitis C treatment obsolete.