Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib as a Monotherapy and Combined Therapy for Advanced Sarcoma

Objective

To analyze the effectiveness of the long-term (> 12 months) administration of anlotinib as a monotherapy or combined therapy in patients with advanced sarcomas.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with advanced sarcomas with measurable target lesions since 2018. Twenty-two of the patients had taken anlotinib regularly for > 12 months. The patients’ general information and the drug’s clinical efficacy and toxicity data were collected and statistically analyzed using RECIST 1.1 to measure the target lesions and tumor PFS time as the main endpoints. We used a swimmer plot to observe the drug’s efficacy and duration, and employed a waterfall plot to express the best treatment effect.

Results

The study included 14 male and 8 female patients, ranging in age from 14 to 75 (mean: 44.82) years. The primary diseases included alveolar soft part sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and others. The metastasis sites were the lungs in fifteen cases, lymph nodes in four cases, and multiple sites in three cases. Fourteen patients had previously undergone chemotherapy. The current therapy protocol was oral anlotinib alone for nine cases, combination chemotherapy for nine cases, and combination immunotherapy (anti-PD-1) for four cases. The highest clinical efficacy was complete remission (CR) in four (18.18%) cases, partial response (PR) in five (22.73%) cases, and stable disease in 13 (59.09%) cases, with an odds ratio of response of 40.91%. The mean PFS for the CR, PR, and stable disease groups was 16.50, 14.50, and 29.31 months, respectively (p < 0.05). The main adverse effects included hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, and leukopenia.

Conclusion

Anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy can be more effective and safer for certain advanced sarcomas, with more extended maintenance and acceptable side effects. Clinical efficacy at the CR and PR levels might predict the long-term PFS in certain advanced sarcomas.

Clinical Impact of Prospective Whole Genome Sequencing in Sarcoma Patients

With more than 70 different histological sarcoma subtypes, accurate classification can be challenging. Although characteristic genetic events can largely facilitate pathological assessment, large-scale molecular profiling generally is not part of regular diagnostic workflows for sarcoma patients. We hypothesized that whole genome sequencing (WGS) optimizes clinical care of sarcoma patients by detection of diagnostic and actionable genomic characteristics, and of underlying hereditary conditions. WGS of tumor and germline DNA was incorporated in the diagnostic work-up of 83 patients with a (presumed) sarcomas in a tertiary referral center. Clinical follow-up data were collected prospectively to assess impact of WGS on clinical decision making. In 12/83 patients (14%), the genomic profile led to revision of cancer diagnosis, with change of treatment plan in eight. All twelve patients had undergone multiple tissue retrieval procedures and immunohistopathological assessments by regional and expert pathologists prior to WGS analysis. Actionable biomarkers with therapeutic potential were identified for 30/83 patients. Pathogenic germline variants were present in seven patients. In conclusion, unbiased genomic characterization with WGS identifies genomic biomarkers with direct clinical implications for sarcoma patients. Given the diagnostic complexity and high unmet need for new treatment opportunities in sarcoma patients, WGS can be an important extension of the diagnostic arsenal of pathologists.

Trabectedin in Advanced Sarcomas-Experience at a Tertiary Care Center and Review of Literature

Background There is sparse literature on trabectedin in advanced soft-tissue sarcomas from developing world. It would be interesting to know about use and outcomes of trabectedin in Indian patients.

Method In a retrospective study, consecutive patients treated with trabectedin from 2016 to 2019 were analyzed. Patients with L-sarcomas were treated at a dose of 1.5 mg/m ² , while those with translocation-related sarcomas were treated at a dose of 1.2 mg/m ² as a 24-hour infusion through peripherally inserted central catheter line. From July 2019, infusions were administered through an ambulatory elastomeric pump, while before that patients were admitted for 24 hours. We used SPSS version 23.0 for statistical calculation.

Result A total of 20 patients received trabectedin with a total of 116 infusions. The median age was 46 years (range: 22–73 years). The male ( n = 11, 55%) and female patients were almost equal ( n = 9, 45%). Thirteen patients (65%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 1. Majority of the patients had leiomyosarcoma ( n = 8, 40%); remaining comprised of liposarcoma (3, 15%), translocation-related sarcomas excluding myxoid liposarcoma ( n = 8, 40%) and others ( n = 1,5%). Most common site was extremity ( n = 11, 55%) followed by retroperitoneal ( n = 3, 15%), visceral ( n = 3, 15%), and others ( n = 3,15%). Median number of previous lines received was 2 (range: 0–4). Median number of trabectedin cycles received was 4 (range: 1–17). Best response assessed was stable disease ( n = 10, 50%), progressive disease ( n = 6, 30%), partial response ( n = 1, 5%), and not assessed in 3 patients. After a median follow-up of 19 months, median progression-free survival was 4 months.

Conclusion In this heavily treated population (composed of L-sarcomas and translocation-related sarcomas) with many patients with poor performance status, the outcome with trabectedin is in synchrony with literature. However, the need of 24-hour admission might deter quality of life. Elastomeric pump seems to be a reasonable alternative to admission and can be a breakthrough in administering trabectedin, especially in developing countries.

Treatment options in unresectable soft tissue and bone sarcoma of the extremities and pelvis - a systematic literature review

In patients with metastatic or unresectable soft tissue and bone sarcoma of extremities and pelvis, survival is generally poor. The aim of the current systematic review was to analyse recent publications on treatment approaches in patients with inoperable and/or metastatic sarcoma.

Original articles published between 1st January 2011 and 2nd May 2020, using the search terms ‘unresectable sarcoma’, ‘inoperability AND sarcoma’, ‘inoperab* AND sarcoma’, and ‘treatment AND unresectable AND sarcoma’ in PubMed, were potentially eligible. Out of the 839 initial articles (containing 274 duplicates) obtained and 23 further articles identified by cross-reference checking, 588 were screened, of which 447 articles were removed not meeting the inclusion criteria. A further 54 articles were excluded following full-text assessment, resulting in 87 articles finally being analysed.

Of the 87 articles, 38 were retrospective (43.7%), two prospective (2.3%), six phase I or I/II trials (6.9%), 22 phase II non-randomized trials (27.6%), nine phase II randomized trials (10.3%) and eight phase III randomized trials (9.2%). Besides radio/particle therapy, isolated limb perfusion and conventional chemotherapy, novel therapeutic approaches, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors were also identified, with partially very promising effects in advanced sarcomas.

Management of inoperable, advanced or metastatic sarcomas of the pelvis and extremities remains challenging, with the optimal treatment to be defined individually. Besides conventional chemotherapy, some novel therapeutic approaches have promising effects in both bone and soft tissue subtypes. Considering that only a small proportion of studies were randomized, the clinical evidence currently remains moderate and thus calls for further large, randomized clinical trials.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:799-814. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200069

Advances of systemic treatment for adult soft-tissue sarcoma

Soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is a group of rare but highly heterogeneous neoplasms. Systemic treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted agents is one of the main therapeutic modalities in patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, while adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for adult-type sarcomas remain controversial. Although an anthracycline (doxorubicin) and ifosfamide remain the cornerstone for chemotherapy, advances have been made recently to exceed its limited efficacy, other agents such as trabectedin, eribulin have been approved. In a recent study, the addition of platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) antibody-olaratumab to doxorubicin resulted in prolongation of progression-free survival and overall survival, which really means a breakthrough for STS. There is more emerging evidence of different sensitivity to treatment for different histological subtypes, second-line treatment for advanced sarcoma is being increasingly driven by histology. Cytotoxic drugs such as dacarbazine, gemcitabine, and taxanes have shown moderate activity in specific subtypes. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including pazopanib and anlotinib, appear to be the promising targeted therapies. Other signal pathway inhibitors as CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor, imatinib, mTOR inhibitors, ALK inhibitor has shown some preliminary effect that need to be verified in the future trials. Checkpoint inhibitors as anti-PD-1 and CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies have been used as a single agent or in combination in the early clinical trials, while further research needs to focus on better patient selection and new combinational strategies. In this review, we aim to summarize the advances of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy in the management of STS.

Elimination of CD4+ T cells in mice bearing an advanced sarcoma augments the antitumor action of interleukin-2

Experiments were undertaken to determine whether the depletion of CD4+ T cells from mice bearing an advanced immunogenic SA-1 sarcoma would result in an enhanced ability of interleukin-2 (IL-2) to cause tumor regression. The results show that whereas IL-2 therapy given as a 5-day course starting on day 10 of tumor growth caused complete regression of the tumor, it failed to cause regression if started on day 15 of tumor growth. However, in mice depleted of CD4+ T cells by treatment with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb), IL-2 therapy started on day 15 resulted in appreciable tumor regression in most animals, and the therapeutic effect was greatly increased if two consecutive courses of anti-CD4 mAb and IL-2 therapy were given. On the other hand, treatment with anti-CD4 mAb alone had no effect on tumor growth. It was shown that the therapeutic action of combination therapy with anti-CD4 mAb and IL-2 was mediated by CD8+ T cells, because the therapeutic effect was completely ablated in mice depleted of CD8+ T cells with anti-CD8 mAb. Taken together these results suggest that, at a late stage of growth of an immunogenic tumor, depletion of CD4+ T cells can enhance the antitumor effect of IL-2 therapy by releasing CD(8+)-T-cell-mediated immunity from T-cell-mediated suppression.