1
|
Fu X, Pereira R, Liu CC, De Angelis C, Shea MJ, Nanda S, Qin L, Mitchell T, Cataldo ML, Veeraraghavan J, Sethunath V, Giuliano M, Gutierrez C, Győrffy B, Trivedi MV, Cohen O, Wagle N, Nardone A, Jeselsohn R, Rimawi MF, Osborne CK, Schiff R. High FOXA1 levels induce ER transcriptional reprogramming, a pro-metastatic secretome, and metastasis in endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112821. [PMID: 37467106 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Aberrant activation of the forkhead protein FOXA1 is observed in advanced hormone-related cancers. However, the key mediators of high FOXA1 signaling remain elusive. We demonstrate that ectopic high FOXA1 (H-FOXA1) expression promotes estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) metastasis in a xenograft mouse model. Mechanistically, H-FOXA1 reprograms ER-chromatin binding to elicit a core gene signature (CGS) enriched in ER+ endocrine-resistant (EndoR) cells. We identify Secretome14, a CGS subset encoding ER-dependent cancer secretory proteins, as a strong predictor for poor outcomes of ER+ BC. It is elevated in ER+ metastases vs. primary tumors, irrespective of ESR1 mutations. Genomic ER binding near Secretome14 genes is also increased in mutant ER-expressing or mitogen-treated ER+ BC cells and in ER+ metastatic vs. primary tumors, suggesting a convergent pathway including high growth factor receptor signaling in activating pro-metastatic secretome genes. Our findings uncover H-FOXA1-induced ER reprogramming that drives EndoR and metastasis partly via an H-FOXA1/ER-dependent secretome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyong Fu
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Resel Pereira
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chia-Chia Liu
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Carmine De Angelis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Martin J Shea
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarmistha Nanda
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lanfang Qin
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tamika Mitchell
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Maria L Cataldo
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jamunarani Veeraraghavan
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Vidyalakshmi Sethunath
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mario Giuliano
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Carolina Gutierrez
- Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Balázs Győrffy
- Department of Bioinformatics, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary; RCNS Cancer Biomarker Research Group, Institute of Enzymology, Magyar Tudósok körútja 2, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Meghana V Trivedi
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA; Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
| | - Ofir Cohen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Agostina Nardone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Rinath Jeselsohn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Mothaffar F Rimawi
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - C Kent Osborne
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rachel Schiff
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herath V, Verchot J. Editorial: Deciphering transcriptional dynamics in plant responses to viruses. Front Plant Sci 2023; 14:1153747. [PMID: 36844050 PMCID: PMC9950769 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1153747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Venura Herath
- Department of Agriculture Biology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
| | - Jeanmarie Verchot
- Department of Plant Pathology & Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hunter AL, Poolman TM, Kim D, Gonzalez FJ, Bechtold DA, Loudon ASI, Iqbal M, Ray DW. HNF4A modulates glucocorticoid action in the liver. Cell Rep 2022; 39:110697. [PMID: 35443180 PMCID: PMC9380254 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a nuclear receptor critical to the regulation of energy metabolism and inflammation. The actions of GR are dependent on cell type and context. Here, we demonstrate the role of liver lineage-determining factor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4A (HNF4A) in defining liver specificity of GR action. In mouse liver, the HNF4A motif lies adjacent to the glucocorticoid response element (GRE) at GR binding sites within regions of open chromatin. In the absence of HNF4A, the liver GR cistrome is remodeled, with loss and gain of GR recruitment evident. Loss of chromatin accessibility at HNF4A-marked sites associates with loss of GR binding at weak GRE motifs. GR binding and chromatin accessibility are gained at sites characterized by strong GRE motifs, which show GR recruitment in non-liver tissues. The functional importance of these HNF4A-regulated GR sites is indicated by an altered transcriptional response to glucocorticoid treatment in the Hnf4a-null liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Louise Hunter
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Toryn M Poolman
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK
| | - Donghwan Kim
- Laboratory of Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Frank J Gonzalez
- Laboratory of Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - David A Bechtold
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Andrew S I Loudon
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Mudassar Iqbal
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - David W Ray
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Song D, He H, Indukuri R, Huang Z, Stepanauskaite L, Sinha I, Haldosén LA, Zhao C, Williams C. ERα and ERβ Homodimers in the Same Cellular Context Regulate Distinct Transcriptomes and Functions. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:930227. [PMID: 35872983 PMCID: PMC9299245 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.930227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The two estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ are nuclear receptors that bind estrogen (E2) and function as ligand-inducible transcription factors. They are homologues and can form dimers with each other and bind to the same estrogen-response element motifs in the DNA. ERα drives breast cancer growth whereas ERβ has been reported to be anti-proliferative. However, they are rarely expressed in the same cells, and it is not fully investigated to which extent their functions are different because of inherent differences or because of different cellular context. To dissect their similarities and differences, we here generated a novel estrogen-dependent cell model where ERα homodimers can be directly compared to ERβ homodimers within the identical cellular context. By using CRISPR-cas9 to delete ERα in breast cancer MCF7 cells with Tet-Off-inducible ERβ expression, we generated MCF7 cells that express ERβ but not ERα. MCF7 (ERβ only) cells exhibited regulation of estrogen-responsive targets in a ligand-dependent manner. We demonstrated that either ER was required for MCF7 proliferation, but while E2 increased proliferation via ERα, it reduced proliferation through a G2/M arrest via ERβ. The two ERs also impacted migration differently. In absence of ligand, ERβ increased migration, but upon E2 treatment, ERβ reduced migration. E2 via ERα, on the other hand, had no significant impact on migration. RNA sequencing revealed that E2 regulated a transcriptome of around 800 genes via each receptor, but over half were specific for either ERα or ERβ (417 and 503 genes, respectively). Functional gene ontology enrichment analysis reinforced that E2 regulated cell proliferation in opposite directions depending on the ER, and that ERβ specifically impacted extracellular matrix organization. We corroborated that ERβ bound to cis-regulatory chromatin of its unique proposed migration-related direct targets ANXA9 and TFAP2C. In conclusion, we demonstrate that within the same cellular context, the two ERs regulate cell proliferation in the opposite manner, impact migration differently, and each receptor also regulates a distinct set of target genes in response to E2. The developed cell model provides a novel and valuable resource to further complement the mechanistic understanding of the two different ER isoforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dandan Song
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Women and Children Diseases, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shandong Province, Jinan, China
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Huan He
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Rajitha Indukuri
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Protein Science, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
| | - Zhiqiang Huang
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Lina Stepanauskaite
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Protein Science, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
| | - Indranil Sinha
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars-Arne Haldosén
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Chunyan Zhao
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Williams
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Protein Science, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health (CBH), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Cecilia Williams,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Severson TM, Zhu Y, De Marzo AM, Jones T, Simons JW, Nelson WG, Yegnasubramanian S, Freedman ML, Wessels L, Bergman AM, Haffner MC, Zwart W. Epigenetic and transcriptional analysis reveals a core transcriptional program conserved in clonal prostate cancer metastases. Mol Oncol 2021; 15:1942-1955. [PMID: 33576154 PMCID: PMC8253095 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The epigenomic regulation of transcriptional programs in metastatic prostate cancer is poorly understood. We studied the epigenomic landscape of prostate cancer drivers using transcriptional profiling and ChIP‐seq in four clonal metastatic tumors derived from a single prostate cancer patient. Our epigenomic analyses focused on androgen receptor (AR), which is a key oncogenic driver in prostate cancer, the AR pioneer factor FOXA1, chromatin insulator CCCTC‐Binding Factor, as well as for modified histones H3K27ac and H3K27me3. The vast majority of AR binding sites were shared among healthy prostate, primary prostate cancer, and metastatic tumor samples, signifying core AR‐driven transcriptional regulation within the prostate cell lineage. Genes associated with core AR‐binding events were significantly enriched for essential genes in prostate cancer cell proliferation. Remarkably, the metastasis‐specific active AR binding sites showed no differential transcriptional output, indicating a robust transcriptional program across metastatic samples. Combined, our data reveal a core transcriptional program in clonal metastatic prostate cancer, despite epigenomic differences in the AR cistrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tesa M. Severson
- Division of OncogenomicsOncode InstituteNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Division of Molecular OncogenesisOncode InstituteNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Yanyun Zhu
- Division of OncogenomicsOncode InstituteNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Angelo M. De Marzo
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of PathologyBrady Urological InstituteJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Tracy Jones
- Department of PathologyJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | | | - William G. Nelson
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of PathologyBrady Urological InstituteJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | | | - Matthew L. Freedman
- Department of Medical OncologyDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
- The Eli and Edythe L. Broad InstituteCambridgeMAUSA
| | - Lodewyk Wessels
- Division of Molecular OncogenesisOncode InstituteNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Andries M. Bergman
- Division of OncogenomicsOncode InstituteNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Department of Medical OncologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Michael C. Haffner
- Divisions of Human Biology and Clinical ResearchFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
- Department of PathologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
- Department of PathologyJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of OncogenomicsOncode InstituteNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Institute for Complex Molecular SystemsDepartment of Biomedical EngineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhoventhe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ko DK, Brandizzi F. A temporal hierarchy underpins the transcription factor-DNA interactome of the maize UPR. Plant J 2021; 105:254-270. [PMID: 33098715 PMCID: PMC7942231 DOI: 10.1111/tpj.15044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Adverse environmental conditions reduce crop productivity and often increase the load of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This potentially lethal condition, known as ER stress, is buffered by the unfolded protein response (UPR), a set of signaling pathways designed to either recover ER functionality or ignite programmed cell death. Despite the biological significance of the UPR to the life of the organism, the regulatory transcriptional landscape underpinning ER stress management is largely unmapped, especially in crops. To fill this significant knowledge gap, we performed a large-scale systems-level analysis of the protein-DNA interaction (PDI) network in maize (Zea mays). Using 23 promoter fragments of six UPR marker genes in a high-throughput enhanced yeast one-hybrid assay, we identified a highly interconnected network of 262 transcription factors (TFs) associated with significant biological traits and 831 PDIs underlying the UPR. We established a temporal hierarchy of TF binding to gene promoters within the same family as well as across different families of TFs. Cistrome analysis revealed the dynamic activities of a variety of cis-regulatory elements (CREs) in ER stress-responsive gene promoters. By integrating the cistrome results into a TF network analysis, we mapped a subnetwork of TFs associated with a CRE that may contribute to UPR management. Finally, we validated the role of a predicted network hub gene using the Arabidopsis system. The PDIs, TF networks, and CREs identified in our work are foundational resources for understanding transcription-regulatory mechanisms in the stress responses and crop improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae Kwan Ko
- MSU-DOE Plant Research Lab, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824
| | - Federica Brandizzi
- MSU-DOE Plant Research Lab, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824
- Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baumgart SJ, Nevedomskaya E, Lesche R, Newman R, Mumberg D, Haendler B. Darolutamide antagonizes androgen signaling by blocking enhancer and super-enhancer activation. Mol Oncol 2020; 14:2022-2039. [PMID: 32333502 PMCID: PMC7463324 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequent tumor types in the male Western population. Early-stage PCa and late-stage PCa are dependent on androgen signaling, and inhibitors of the androgen receptor (AR) axis represent the standard therapy. Here, we studied in detail the global impact of darolutamide, a newly approved AR antagonist, on the transcriptome and AR-bound cistrome in two PCa cell models. Darolutamide strongly depleted the AR from gene regulatory regions and abolished AR-driven transcriptional signaling. Enhancer activation was blocked at the chromatin level as evaluated by H3K27 acetylation (H3K27ac), H3K4 monomethylation (H3K4me1), and FOXA1, MED1, and BRD4 binding. We identified genomic regions with high affinities for the AR in androgen-stimulated, but also in androgen-depleted conditions. A similar AR affinity pattern was observed in healthy and PCa tissue samples. High FOXA1, BRD4, H3K27ac, and H3K4me1 levels were found to mark regions showing AR binding in the hormone-depleted setting. Conversely, low FOXA1, BRD4, and H3K27ac levels were observed at regulatory sites that responded strongly to androgen stimulation, and AR interactions at these sites were blocked by darolutamide. Beside marked loss of AR occupancy, FOXA1 recruitment to chromatin was also clearly reduced after darolutamide treatment. We furthermore identified numerous androgen-regulated super-enhancers (SEs) that were associated with hallmark androgen and cell proliferation-associated gene sets. Importantly, these SEs are also active in PCa tissues and sensitive to darolutamide treatment in our models. Our findings demonstrate that darolutamide is a potent AR antagonist blocking genome-wide AR enhancer and SE activation, and downstream transcription. We also show the existence of a dynamic AR cistrome that depends on the androgen levels and on high AR affinity regions present in PCa cell lines and also in tissue samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ralf Lesche
- Research and Development, PharmaceuticalsBayer AGBerlinGermany
| | - Richard Newman
- Research and Development, PharmaceuticalsBayer AGBerlinGermany
| | - Dominik Mumberg
- Research and Development, PharmaceuticalsBayer AGBerlinGermany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chi RPA, Wang T, Adams N, Wu SP, Young SL, Spencer TE, DeMayo F. Human Endometrial Transcriptome and Progesterone Receptor Cistrome Reveal Important Pathways and Epithelial Regulators. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105:5608978. [PMID: 31665330 PMCID: PMC7105253 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgz117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Poor uterine receptivity is one major factor leading to pregnancy loss and infertility. Understanding the molecular events governing successful implantation is hence critical in combating infertility. OBJECTIVE To define Progesterone Receptor (PGR)-regulated molecular mechanisms and epithelial roles in receptivity. DESIGN RNA-sequencing and PGR-ChIP-seq were conducted in parallel to identify PGR-regulated pathways during the Window of implantation (WOI) in endometrium of fertile women. SETTING Endometrial biopsies from the proliferative and mid-secretory phases were analyzed. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS Participants were fertile, reproductive aged (18-37 years) women with normal cycle length, and without any history of dysmenorrhea, infertility, or irregular cycles. In total, 42 endometrial biopsies obtained from 42 women were analyzed in this study. INTERVENTIONS There were no interventions during this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Here we measured the alterations in gene expression and PGR occupancy in the genome during the WOI, based on the hypothesis that PGR binds uterine chromatin cycle dependently to regulate genes involved in uterine cell differentiation and function. RESULTS 653 genes were identified with regulated PGR binding and differential expression during the WOI. These were involved in regulating inflammatory response, xenobiotic metabolism, epithelial mesenchymal transition, cell death, interleukin/Signal Transducer And Activator Of Transcription (STAT) signaling, estrogen response, and Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (MTORC1) response. Transcriptome of the epithelium identified 3052 differentially expressed genes, of which 658 were uniquely regulated. Transcription factors Interferon Regulatory Factor 8 (IRF8) and Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2C (MEF2C) were found to be regulated in the epithelium during the WOI at the protein level, suggesting potentially important functions that are previously unrecognized. CONCLUSION PGR binds the genomic regions of genes regulating critical processes in uterine receptivity and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru-pin Alicia Chi
- Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tianyuan Wang
- Integrative Bioinformatics Support Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nyssa Adams
- Interdepartmental Program in Translational Biology and Molecular Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - San-pin Wu
- Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Steven L Young
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Thomas E Spencer
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Francesco DeMayo
- Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina
- Correspondence and Reprint Requests: Francesco DeMayo, Reproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wasmuth EV, Hoover EA, Antar A, Klinge S, Chen Y, Sawyers CL. Modulation of androgen receptor DNA binding activity through direct interaction with the ETS transcription factor ERG. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:8584-92. [PMID: 32220959 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1922159117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Progress in studying the androgen receptor (AR), the primary drug target in prostate cancer, has been hampered by challenges in expressing and purifying active multidomain AR for use in cell-free biochemical reconstitution assays. Here we successfully express full-length and truncated AR variants and demonstrate that the oncogenic ETS protein ERG, responsible for half of all prostate cancers, enhances the ability of AR to bind DNA through direct interaction with AR. In addition to providing a biochemical system to evaluate AR activity on different DNA templates, our findings provide insight into why ERG-positive prostate cancers have an expanded AR cistrome. The androgen receptor (AR) is a type I nuclear hormone receptor and the primary drug target in prostate cancer due to its role as a lineage survival factor in prostate luminal epithelium. In prostate cancer, the AR cistrome is reprogrammed relative to normal prostate epithelium and particularly in cancers driven by oncogenic ETS fusion genes. The molecular basis for this change has remained elusive. Using purified proteins, we report a minimal cell-free system that demonstrates interdomain cooperativity between the ligand (LBD) and DNA binding domains (DBD) of AR, and its autoinhibition by the N terminus of AR. Furthermore, we identify ERG as a cofactor that activates AR’s ability to bind DNA in both high and lower affinity contexts through direct interaction within a newly identified AR-interacting motif (AIM) in the ETS domain, independent of ERG’s own DNA binding ability. Finally, we present evidence that this interaction is conserved among ETS factors whose expression is altered in prostate cancer. Our work highlights, at a biochemical level, how tumor-initiating ETS translocations result in reprogramming of the AR cistrome.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fei T, Li W, Peng J, Xiao T, Chen CH, Wu A, Huang J, Zang C, Liu XS, Brown M. Deciphering essential cistromes using genome-wide CRISPR screens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116:25186-95. [PMID: 31727847 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1908155116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Systematically dissecting the function of a large set of cis-regulatory elements or transcription factor binding sites (cistromes) has been technically challenging. Using genome-wide CRISPR screens, we profiled over 10,000 FOXA1 and CTCF binding sites for their roles in regulating the fitness of breast and prostate cancer cells, and accordingly developed a model to predict essentiality for cis-elements. These efforts not only reveal how the key transcription factors and their cistromes regulate cell essentiality in hormone-dependent cancers but also highlight an efficient approach to investigate the functions of noncoding regions of the genome. Although millions of transcription factor binding sites, or cistromes, have been identified across the human genome, defining which of these sites is functional in a given condition remains challenging. Using CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens and gene essentiality or fitness as the readout, we systematically investigated the essentiality of over 10,000 FOXA1 and CTCF binding sites in breast and prostate cancer cells. We found that essential FOXA1 binding sites act as enhancers to orchestrate the expression of nearby essential genes through the binding of lineage-specific transcription factors. In contrast, CRISPR screens of the CTCF cistrome revealed 2 classes of essential binding sites. The first class of essential CTCF binding sites act like FOXA1 sites as enhancers to regulate the expression of nearby essential genes, while a second class of essential CTCF binding sites was identified at topologically associated domain (TAD) boundaries and display distinct characteristics. Using regression methods trained on our screening data and public epigenetic profiles, we developed a model to predict essential cis-elements with high accuracy. The model for FOXA1 essentiality correctly predicts noncoding variants associated with cancer risk and progression. Taken together, CRISPR screens of cis-regulatory elements can define the essential cistrome of a given factor and can inform the development of predictive models of cistrome function.
Collapse
|
11
|
Cocce KJ, Jasper JS, Desautels TK, Everett L, Wardell S, Westerling T, Baldi R, Wright TM, Tavares K, Yllanes A, Bae Y, Blitzer JT, Logsdon C, Rakiec DP, Ruddy DA, Jiang T, Broadwater G, Hyslop T, Hall A, Laine M, Phung L, Greene GL, Martin LA, Pancholi S, Dowsett M, Detre S, Marks JR, Crawford GE, Brown M, Norris JD, Chang CY, McDonnell DP. The Lineage Determining Factor GRHL2 Collaborates with FOXA1 to Establish a Targetable Pathway in Endocrine Therapy-Resistant Breast Cancer. Cell Rep 2019; 29:889-903.e10. [PMID: 31644911 PMCID: PMC6874102 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Notwithstanding the positive clinical impact of endocrine therapies in estrogen receptor-alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancer, de novo and acquired resistance limits the therapeutic lifespan of existing drugs. Taking the position that resistance is nearly inevitable, we undertook a study to identify and exploit targetable vulnerabilities that were manifest in endocrine therapy-resistant disease. Using cellular and mouse models of endocrine therapy-sensitive and endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer, together with contemporary discovery platforms, we identified a targetable pathway that is composed of the transcription factors FOXA1 and GRHL2, a coregulated target gene, the membrane receptor LYPD3, and the LYPD3 ligand, AGR2. Inhibition of the activity of this pathway using blocking antibodies directed against LYPD3 or AGR2 inhibits the growth of endocrine therapy-resistant tumors in mice, providing the rationale for near-term clinical development of humanized antibodies directed against these proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly J Cocce
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jeff S Jasper
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Taylor K Desautels
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Logan Everett
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Suzanne Wardell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Thomas Westerling
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Robert Baldi
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Tricia M Wright
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kendall Tavares
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Alex Yllanes
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Yeeun Bae
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Craig Logsdon
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA
| | - Daniel P Rakiec
- Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Oncology Disease Area, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - David A Ruddy
- Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Oncology Disease Area, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Tiancong Jiang
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Gloria Broadwater
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Terry Hyslop
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Allison Hall
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Muriel Laine
- The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Linda Phung
- The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Geoffrey L Greene
- The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Lesley-Ann Martin
- Breast Cancer Now, Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Sunil Pancholi
- Breast Cancer Now, Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Mitch Dowsett
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Simone Detre
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Jeffrey R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Gregory E Crawford
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Myles Brown
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - John D Norris
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Ching-Yi Chang
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Donald P McDonnell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Copeland BT, Du J, Pal SK, Jones JO. Factors that influence the androgen receptor cistrome in benign and malignant prostate cells. Mol Oncol 2019; 13:2616-2632. [PMID: 31520575 PMCID: PMC6887583 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The androgen receptor (AR) plays key roles in the development of prostate tissue and the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC). AR guides cytodifferentiation and homeostasis in benign luminal epithelial cells; however, in PC, AR instead drives the uncontrolled proliferation of these cells. This ‘AR malignancy shift’ (AMS) is a central event in tumorigenesis. Using a ChIP‐seq approach in primary human tissues, cell lines, and mouse models, we demonstrate that the AMS occurs in every sample analyzed, suggesting that it is necessary for PC development. Using molecular and genetic techniques, we demonstrate that forkhead box (FOX)A1, HOXB13, GATA2, and c‐JUN are involved in the regulation of the AMS. AR‐binding sites (ARBS) are enriched for FOX, HOX, and GATA motifs in PC cells but not for c‐JUN motifs in benign cells. We show that the SPOP mutation commonly found in localized PCs can cause the AMS but is not transformative on its own and must be coupled to another mutation to transform cells. We show that the AMS occurs in mouse models of PC as well and that chronic low T, which is associated with increased PC risk and aggressiveness in humans, also causes the AMS in mice. We have discovered a previously unrecognized, fundamental tenet of PC, one which explains how and why AR signaling is different in cancer and benign cells. Our work has the potential to be used to stratify patients with localized PC for specific treatments. Furthermore, our work suggests that the AMS is a novel target for the treatment and/or prevention of PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben T Copeland
- Deparment of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Juan Du
- Integrative Genomics Core, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- Deparment of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jeremy O Jones
- Deparment of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stelloo S, Bergman AM, Zwart W. Androgen receptor enhancer usage and the chromatin regulatory landscape in human prostate cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer 2019; 26:R267-R285. [PMID: 30865928 DOI: 10.1530/erc-19-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The androgen receptor (AR) is commonly known as a key transcription factor in prostate cancer development, progression and therapy resistance. Genome-wide chromatin association studies revealed that transcriptional regulation by AR mainly depends on binding to distal regulatory enhancer elements that control gene expression through chromatin looping to gene promoters. Changes in the chromatin epigenetic landscape and DNA sequence can locally alter AR-DNA-binding capacity and consequently impact transcriptional output and disease outcome. The vast majority of reports describing AR chromatin interactions have been limited to cell lines, identifying numerous other factors and interacting transcription factors that impact AR chromatin interactions. Do these factors also impact AR cistromics - the genome-wide chromatin-binding landscape of AR - in vivo? Recent technological advances now enable researchers to identify AR chromatin-binding sites and their target genes in human specimens. In this review, we provide an overview of the different factors that influence AR chromatin binding in prostate cancer specimens, which is complemented with knowledge from cell line studies. Finally, we discuss novel perspectives on studying AR cistromics in clinical samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzan Stelloo
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries M Bergman
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang H, Akagi T, Kawakatsu T, Tao R. Gene networks orchestrated by MeGI: a single-factor mechanism underlying sex determination in persimmon. Plant J 2019; 98:97-111. [PMID: 30556936 PMCID: PMC6850717 DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Separating male and female sex organs is one of the main strategies used to maintain genetic diversity within a species. However, the genetic determinants and their regulatory mechanisms have been identified in only a few species. In dioecious persimmons, the homeodomain transcription factor, MeGI, which is the target of a Y chromosome-encoded small-RNA, OGI, can determine floral sexuality. The basic features of this system are conserved in the monoecious hexaploid Oriental persimmon, in which an additional epigenetic regulation of MeGI determines floral sexuality. The downstream regulatory pathways of MeGI remain uncharacterized. In this study, we examined transcriptomic data for male and female flowers from monoecious persimmon cultivars to unveil the gene networks orchestrated by MeGI. A network visualization and cistrome assessment suggested that class-1 KNOTTED-like homeobox (KNOX)/ovate family protein (OFP)/growth regulating factors (GRFs) and short vegetative phase (SVP) genes mediate the differences in gynoecium and androecium development between male and female flowers, respectively. The expression of these genes is directly controlled by MeGI. The gene networks also suggested that some cytokinin, auxin, and gibberellin signaling genes function cooperatively in the KNOX/OFP/GRF pathway during gynoecium differentiation. Meanwhile, SVP may repress PI expression in developing androecia. Overall, our results suggest that MeGI evolved the ability to promote gynoecium development and suppress androecium development by regulating KNOX/OFP/GRF and SVP expression levels, respectively. These insights may help to clarify the molecular mechanism underlying the production of unisexual flowers, while also elucidating the physiological background enabling a single-factor system to establish dioecy in plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ho‐Wen Yang
- Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyoto606‐8502Japan
| | - Takashi Akagi
- Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyoto606‐8502Japan
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)PRESTOKawaguchi‐shiSaitama332‐0012Japan
| | - Taiji Kawakatsu
- Division of BiotechnologyInstitute of Agrobiological SciencesNational Agriculture and Food Research OrganizationTsukubaIbaraki305‐8602Japan
| | - Ryutaro Tao
- Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyoto606‐8502Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chattopadhyay I, Wang J, Qin M, Gao L, Holtz R, Vessella RL, Leach RW, Gelman IH. Src promotes castration-recurrent prostate cancer through androgen receptor-dependent canonical and non-canonical transcriptional signatures. Oncotarget 2018; 8:10324-10347. [PMID: 28055971 PMCID: PMC5354662 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Progression of prostate cancer (PC) to castration-recurrent growth (CRPC) remains dependent on sustained expression and transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor (AR). A major mechanism contributing to CRPC progression is through the direct phosphorylation and activation of AR by Src-family (SFK) and ACK1 tyrosine kinases. However, the AR-dependent transcriptional networks activated by Src during CRPC progression have not been elucidated. Here, we show that activated Src (Src527F) induces androgen-independent growth in human LNCaP cells, concomitant with its ability to induce proliferation/survival genes normally induced by dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in androgen-dependent LNCaP and VCaP cells. Src induces additional gene signatures unique to CRPC cell lines, LNCaP-C4-2 and CWR22Rv1, and to CRPC LuCaP35.1 xenografts. By comparing the Src-induced AR-cistrome and/or transcriptome in LNCaP to those in CRPC and LuCaP35.1 tumors, we identified an 11-gene Src-regulated CRPC signature consisting of AR-dependent, AR binding site (ARBS)-associated genes whose expression is altered by DHT in LNCaP[Src527F] but not in LNCaP cells. The differential expression of a subset (DPP4, BCAT1, CNTNAP4, CDH3) correlates with earlier PC metastasis onset and poorer survival, with the expression of BCAT1 required for Src-induced androgen-independent proliferation. Lastly, Src enhances AR binding to non-canonical ARBS enriched for FOXO1, TOP2B and ZNF217 binding motifs; cooperative AR/TOP2B binding to a non-canonical ARBS was both Src- and DHT-sensitive and correlated with increased levels of Src-induced phosphotyrosyl-TOP2B. These data suggest that CRPC progression is facilitated via Src-induced sensitization of AR to intracrine androgen levels, resulting in the engagement of canonical and non-canonical ARBS-dependent gene signatures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indranil Chattopadhyay
- Department of Life Sciences, School of Basic and Applied Science, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Jianmin Wang
- Department of Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Maochun Qin
- Department of Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Lingqiu Gao
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Renae Holtz
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | | - Robert W Leach
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Irwin H Gelman
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jeselsohn R, Bergholz JS, Pun M, Cornwell M, Liu W, Nardone A, Xiao T, Li W, Qiu X, Buchwalter G, Feiglin A, Abell-Hart K, Fei T, Rao P, Long H, Kwiatkowski N, Zhang T, Gray N, Melchers D, Houtman R, Liu XS, Cohen O, Wagle N, Winer EP, Zhao J, Brown M. Allele-Specific Chromatin Recruitment and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities of ESR1 Activating Mutations. Cancer Cell 2018; 33:173-186.e5. [PMID: 29438694 PMCID: PMC5813700 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Estrogen receptor α (ER) ligand-binding domain (LBD) mutations are found in a substantial number of endocrine treatment-resistant metastatic ER-positive (ER+) breast cancers. We investigated the chromatin recruitment, transcriptional network, and genetic vulnerabilities in breast cancer models harboring the clinically relevant ER mutations. These mutants exhibit both ligand-independent functions that mimic estradiol-bound wild-type ER as well as allele-specific neomorphic properties that promote a pro-metastatic phenotype. Analysis of the genome-wide ER binding sites identified mutant ER unique recruitment mediating the allele-specific transcriptional program. Genetic screens identified genes that are essential for the ligand-independent growth driven by the mutants. These studies provide insights into the mechanism of endocrine therapy resistance engendered by ER mutations and potential therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinath Jeselsohn
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Johann S Bergholz
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Matthew Pun
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - MacIntosh Cornwell
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Weihan Liu
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Agostina Nardone
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Tengfei Xiao
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Wei Li
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Xintao Qiu
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Gilles Buchwalter
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Ariel Feiglin
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Kayley Abell-Hart
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Teng Fei
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Prakash Rao
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Henry Long
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Nicholas Kwiatkowski
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Tinghu Zhang
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Nathanael Gray
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Diane Melchers
- PamGene International BV, Hertogenbosch 5211, the Netherlands
| | - Rene Houtman
- PamGene International BV, Hertogenbosch 5211, the Netherlands
| | - X Shirley Liu
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Ofir Cohen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02210, USA
| | - Jean Zhao
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Myles Brown
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02210, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jeselsohn R, Cornwell M, Pun M, Buchwalter G, Nguyen M, Bango C, Huang Y, Kuang Y, Paweletz C, Fu X, Nardone A, De Angelis C, Detre S, Dodson A, Mohammed H, Carroll JS, Bowden M, Rao P, Long HW, Li F, Dowsett M, Schiff R, Brown M. Embryonic transcription factor SOX9 drives breast cancer endocrine resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:E4482-E4491. [PMID: 28507152 PMCID: PMC5465894 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1620993114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The estrogen receptor (ER) drives the growth of most luminal breast cancers and is the primary target of endocrine therapy. Although ER blockade with drugs such as tamoxifen is very effective, a major clinical limitation is the development of endocrine resistance especially in the setting of metastatic disease. Preclinical and clinical observations suggest that even following the development of endocrine resistance, ER signaling continues to exert a pivotal role in tumor progression in the majority of cases. Through the analysis of the ER cistrome in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells, we have uncovered a role for an RUNX2-ER complex that stimulates the transcription of a set of genes, including most notably the stem cell factor SOX9, that promote proliferation and a metastatic phenotype. We show that up-regulation of SOX9 is sufficient to cause relative endocrine resistance. The gain of SOX9 as an ER-regulated gene associated with tamoxifen resistance was validated in a unique set of clinical samples supporting the need for the development of improved ER antagonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinath Jeselsohn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215;
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Breast Oncology Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - MacIntosh Cornwell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Matthew Pun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Gilles Buchwalter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Mai Nguyen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Clyde Bango
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Yanan Kuang
- Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Cloud Paweletz
- Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Xiaoyong Fu
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Agostina Nardone
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Carmine De Angelis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Simone Detre
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, SW3 6JB, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Dodson
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, SW3 6JB, United Kingdom
| | - Hisham Mohammed
- Nuclear Transcription Factor Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge University, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, United Kingdom
| | - Jason S Carroll
- Nuclear Transcription Factor Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Cambridge University, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, United Kingdom
| | - Michaela Bowden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Prakash Rao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Henry W Long
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Fugen Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Mitchell Dowsett
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, SW3 6JB, United Kingdom
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robin's Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Schiff
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Myles Brown
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215;
- Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Breast Oncology Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dubois-Chevalier J, Staels B, Lefebvre P, Eeckhoute J. The ubiquitous transcription factor CTCF promotes lineage-specific epigenomic remodeling and establishment of transcriptional networks driving cell differentiation. Nucleus 2015; 6:15-8. [PMID: 25565413 DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2015.1004258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Cell differentiation relies on tissue-specific transcription factors (TFs) that cooperate to establish unique transcriptomes and phenotypes. However, the role of ubiquitous TFs in these processes remains poorly defined. Recently, we have shown that the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is required for adipocyte differentiation through epigenomic remodelling of adipose tissue-specific enhancers and transcriptional activation of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG), the main driver of the adipogenic program (PPARG), and its target genes. Here, we discuss how these findings, together with the recent literature, illuminate a functional role for ubiquitous TFs in lineage-determining transcriptional networks.
Collapse
Key Words
- 5hmC, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine
- 5mC, 5-methylcytosine
- CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)
- CEBP, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein
- CTCF, CCCTC-binding factor
- DNA hydroxymethylation
- H3K27ac, acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27
- H3K4me1, monomethylation of histone H3 lysine 4
- KLF, Krüppel-like factors
- PPARG, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma
- TET methylcytosine dioxygenase
- TET, Ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenase
- TF, Transcription factor
- cell differentiation
- cistrome
- enhancer
- epigenome
- transcriptome
- ubiquitous transcription factor
Collapse
|
19
|
He Y, Tsuei J, Wan YJY. Biological functional annotation of retinoic acid alpha and beta in mouse liver based on genome-wide binding. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2014; 307:G205-18. [PMID: 24833708 PMCID: PMC4101682 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00105.2014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Retinoic acid (RA) has diverse biological effects. The liver stores vitamin A, generates RA, and expresses receptors for RA. The current study examines the hepatic binding profile of two RA receptor isoforms, RARA (RARα) and RARB (RARβ), in response to RA treatment in mouse livers. Our data uncovered 35,521, and 14,968 genomic bindings for RARA and RARB, respectively. Each expressed unique and common bindings, implying their redundant and specific roles. RARB has higher RA responsiveness than RARB. RA treatment generated 18,821 novel RARB bindings but only 14,798 of RARA bindings, compared with the control group. RAR frequently bound the consensus hormone response element [HRE; (A/G)G(G/T)TCA], which often contained the motifs assigned to SP1, GABPA, and FOXA2, suggesting potential interactions between those transcriptional factors. Functional annotation coupled with principle component analysis revealed that the function of RAR target genes were motif dependent. Taken together, the cistrome of RARA and RARB revealed their extensive biological roles in the mouse liver. RAR target genes are enriched in various biological processes. The hepatic RAR genome-wide binding data can help us understand the global molecular mechanisms underlying RAR and RA-mediated gene and pathway regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) is a command-line tool designed by X. Shirley Liu and colleagues to analyze data generated by ChIP-Seq experiments in eukaryotes, especially mammals. MACS can be used to identify transcription factor binding sites and histone modification-enriched regions if the ChIP-Seq data, with or without control samples, are given. This unit describes two basic protocols that provide detailed information on how to use MACS to identify either the binding sites of a transcription factor or the enriched regions of a histone modification with broad peaks. Furthermore, the basic ideas for the MACS algorithm and its appropriate usage are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianxing Feng
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Tao Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Yong Zhang
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China,Author for correspondence: Tel.: +86-65981196; Fax: +86-65981041;
| |
Collapse
|