The influence of cortisol co-secretion on clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes in unilateral primary aldosteronism

Context

The prevalence of unilateral primary aldosteronism (UPA) with cortisol co-secretion varies geographically.

Objective

To investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of UPA with cortisol co-secretion in a Chinese population.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

We recruited 580 patients with UPA who underwent cosyntropin stimulation test (CST) after the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) and retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of UPA with and without cortisol co-secretion.

Results

UPA with cortisol co-secretion (1 mg DST>1.8 ug/dL) was identified in 65 of 580 (11.2%) patients. These patients were characterized by older age, longer duration of hypertension, higher concentration of plasma aldosterone and midnight cortisol, lower adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), larger tumor diameter, and more history of diabetes mellitus. Cortisol and aldosterone levels were higher and DHEAS level was lower in UPA with cortisol co-secretion at 0-120 min after CST. Among 342 UPA patients with KCNJ5 gene sequencing and follow-up results, the complete clinical success rate was lower in UPA with cortisol co-secretion (33.3% vs. 56.4%, P<0.05); the complete biochemical success rate and KCNJ5 mutation did not differ between the two groups. Age, tumor size, and ACTH were independent predictors of UPA with cortisol co-secretion. Sex, BMI, duration of hypertension, KCNJ5 mutation, and cortisol co-secretion were independent predictors for complete clinical success in UPA after surgery.

Conclusions

UPA with cortisol co-secretion is not uncommon in China, but the clinical features were distinctly different from those without co-secretion. Cortisol co-secretion is an independent risk factor for incomplete clinical success after surgery in UPA.

Screening for non-classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia in women: New insights using different immunoassays

CONTEXT

The 250µg-cosyntropin stimulation test (CST) is used to diagnose non-classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (NCCAH). The current recommendation is to perform CST when follicular 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) is 6-30 nmol/L, a cutoff derived from radioimmunoassay (RIA). Recently, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has replaced RIA.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to (1) determine the RIA and ELISA-based 17OHP cutoffs at which CST should be performed, (2) identify predictors of NCCAH.

METHODS

A retrospective study at an Israeli Health Maintenance Organization. Data were retrieved from women with suspected NCCAH, referred for CST during 2001-2020. NCCAH was defined as a stimulated 17OHP >30 nmol/L. Serum 17OHP levels were assayed by RIA from 1/2000-3/2015, and by ELISA from 4/2015-12/2020. ROC curves were generated and optimal 17OHP thresholds were determined. Multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

CST was performed in 2409 women (1564 in RIA, 845 in ELISA). NCCAH was diagnosed in 4.7% of the RIA group and 7.5% of the ELISA group. The optimal basal 17OHP cutoff values predicting NCCAH were 6.1 nmol/L in RIA (sensitivity=93.2%, specificity=91.7%) and 8.2 nmol/L in ELISA (sensitivity=93.7%, specificity=92.3%). In multivariate analysis, higher basal 17OHP, lower LH: FSH ratio, and oligomenorrhea were predictors of NCCAH in RIA. Higher basal 17OHP, androstenedione, and total testosterone were predictors of NCCAH in ELISA. A lower LH: FSH ratio showed similar trend in ELISA.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal RIA-based basal 17OHP cutoff was comparable with that recommended in guidelines. The results suggest adopting a higher 17OHP cutoff when using ELISA. LH : FSH ratio improves the negative predictive value of basal 17OHP.

Cortisol values during the standard-dose cosyntropin stimulation test: Personal experience with Elecsys cortisol II assay

PURPOSE

There has been debate regarding the appropriate cortisol cutoff during the cosyntropin stimulation test (CST) when newer cortisol assays are used. We aimed to evaluate the proper cortisol values during the standard dose CST in patients with normal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis when the Elecsys^® Cortisol II assay from Roche Diagnostics is used.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients evaluated for possible adrenal insufficiency using the standard-dose (250 mcg) CST from January 2018 to December 2020 and eventually judged to have a normal HPA axis. All the CSTs were done in the outpatient setting. Evaluation by an endocrinologist, restrictive exclusion criteria including prior glucocorticoid and opioid use, and lack of glucocorticoid treatment for at least 6 months after the CST was used to define normal HPA axis. The results are reported in the median (range).

RESULTS

We identified 63 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were considered to have a normal HPA axis. The median age was 54.7 (27.6-89.1) years; 32 (51%) were female, and 27 (43%) were white. The duration of follow-up after the CST without any glucocorticoid replacement was 13.9 (6.3-43.9) months. Cortisol levels were 21.7 (15.7-29.1) µg/dl and 24.4 (17.9-35.8) µg/dl at 30- and 60-minutes after cosyntropin administration, respectively. The lowest cortisol levels at 30 and 60 minutes for patients with either normal TSH or gonadal axis (n=47) or in whom both axes were normal (n=18) were similar to the ones of the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports using a lower than previously recommended cortisol cutoff value at 30 minutes after Cosyntropin using the Roche Elecsys^® Cortisol II assay. The lowest cortisol levels in our cohort were 15.7 and 17.9 µg/dL at 30 and 60 minutes after the CST, respectively. Therefore, it is essential to consider the time of cortisol draw after cosyntropin administration.

Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency and Growth Hormone Deficiency in Patients with Fibromyalgia

Purpose

Patients with fibromyalgia (FM) may demonstrate low cortisol concentrations during diagnostic evaluation. However, it remains unclear whether low cortisol reflects underlying pituitary dysfunction. We aimed to determine if a subset of patients with FM have concomitant secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) and growth hormone deficiency (GH).

Patients and Methods

This is a retrospective study of all patients with FM diagnosed with SAI based on abnormal insulin tolerance test (ITT) between June 2002 and August 2019. Patients were excluded if they had other reasons for SAI. Measurements include cortisol and GH during ITT in all patients, and peak cortisol during cosyntropin stimulation test in a subset of patients.

Results

We identified 22 patients (median age of 38 years (range 19-65), 18 (82%) women) diagnosed with secondary AI based on abnormal ITT (peak median cortisol level of 11 mcg/dL (range 5.4-17)). Concomitant GH deficiency was diagnosed in 19 (86%) patients. Cosyntropin stimulation test was performed in 14 (64%) patients and was normal in 11 (79%) (peak cortisol ≥18 mcg/dL). MRI pituitary imaging was performed in 20 patients and showed no significant pituitary pathology. All patients were started on physiologic glucocorticoid replacement, and 5 patients were started on GH replacement. Of the 13 patients with follow-up, 8 (62%) reported symptom improvement after starting treatment.

Conclusion

Patients with FM can have concurrent SAI and GH deficiency. Cosyntropin stimulation test should not be used to exclude SAI in patients with FM. Appropriate glucocorticoid and/or GH replacement may improve symptoms in some patients.

Serum Cortisol Level in Indian Patients with Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock

Background:

The relationship between cortisol level and sepsis is not known in Indian patients of severe sepsis/septic shock.

Aims:

The study was done to determine the optimal range of cortisol levels, defining the adrenocortical response, and predicting the mortality, if possible, in the above type of patients.

Settings and Designs:

The study was a single-centered prospective cohort study, conducted in a tertiary referral center, North India.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty patients with severe sepsis (n = 30) and septic shock (n = 30) were recruited. Basal and postcosyntropin (1 μg)-stimulated cortisol levels were measured, and all patients were closely monitored with daily assessments of clinical and laboratory variables. Western diagnostic criteria were followed for defining adrenal insufficiency (AI). The end point was the survival assessed at day 28 or death, whichever came earlier.

Results:

The mean basal (T0) and poststimulation (T30) cortisol levels were 31.77 ± 15.9 μg/dL and 37.58 ± 17.31 μg/dL, respectively. In all sepsis patients, 48.33% qualified as AI at T0 ≤ 24 μg/dL, 61.67% at delta cortisol (Δ = T30-T0) ≤7 μg/dL, and 78.33% at Δ ≤9 μg/dL. Using receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.4954, signifying poor prediction to death.

Conclusions:

Indians have completely different characteristics of cortisol levels in sepsis patients, in comparison to the Western data. They have higher range of basal cortisol levels, higher percentage of AI, and an inability to predict mortality with the cortisol levels. Hence, there is requirement of an international study to confirm the dichotomy of the results.