1
|
Bart A, Hall GA, Gillam L. Gillick competence: an inadequate guide to the ethics of involving adolescents in decision-making. J Med Ethics 2024; 50:157-162. [PMID: 37169548 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-108930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Developmentally, adolescence sits in transition between childhood and adulthood. Involving adolescents in their medical decision-making prompts important and complex ethical questions. Originating in the UK, the concept of Gillick competence is a dominant framework for navigating adolescent medical decision-making from legal, ethical and clinical perspectives and is commonly treated as comprehensive. In this paper, we argue that its utility is far more limited, and hence over-reliance on Gillick risks undermining rather than promoting ethically appropriate adolescent involvement. We demonstrate that Gillick only provides guidance in the limited range of cases where legal decisional authority needs to be clarified. The range of cases where use of Gillick actually promotes adolescent involvement is narrower still, because several features must be present for Gillick to be enacted. Each of these features can, and do, act as barriers to adolescent involvement. Within these limited situations, we argue that Gillick is not specific or strong enough and is reliant on ethically contestable principles. Moreover, in most situations in adolescent healthcare, Gillick is silent on the ethical questions around involving adolescents. This is because it focuses on decisional authority-having the final say in decision-making-which is one small subset of the many ways adolescents could be involved in decision-making. The implication of our analysis is that use of Gillick competence tends to limit or undermine adolescent involvement opportunities. We propose that those working with adolescents should be judicious in seeking Gillick's guidance, instead drawing on and developing alternative frameworks that provide a comprehensive model for adolescent involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avraham Bart
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Georgina Antonia Hall
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lynn Gillam
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Flores L, Kim S, Young SD. Addressing bias in artificial intelligence for public health surveillance. J Med Ethics 2024; 50:190-194. [PMID: 37130756 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Components of artificial intelligence (AI) for analysing social big data, such as natural language processing (NLP) algorithms, have improved the timeliness and robustness of health data. NLP techniques have been implemented to analyse large volumes of text from social media platforms to gain insights on disease symptoms, understand barriers to care and predict disease outbreaks. However, AI-based decisions may contain biases that could misrepresent populations, skew results or lead to errors. Bias, within the scope of this paper, is described as the difference between the predictive values and true values within the modelling of an algorithm. Bias within algorithms may lead to inaccurate healthcare outcomes and exacerbate health disparities when results derived from these biased algorithms are applied to health interventions. Researchers who implement these algorithms must consider when and how bias may arise. This paper explores algorithmic biases as a result of data collection, labelling and modelling of NLP algorithms. Researchers have a role in ensuring that efforts towards combating bias are enforced, especially when drawing health conclusions derived from social media posts that are linguistically diverse. Through the implementation of open collaboration, auditing processes and the development of guidelines, researchers may be able to reduce bias and improve NLP algorithms that improve health surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Flores
- Department of Informatics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Seungjun Kim
- Department of Informatics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Sean D Young
- Department of Informatics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parsa-Parsi RW, Gillon R, Wiesing U. The revised International Code of Medical Ethics: an exercise in international professional ethical self-regulation. J Med Ethics 2024; 50:163-168. [PMID: 37487625 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
The World Medical Association (WMA), the global representation of the medical profession, first adopted the International Code of Medical Ethics (ICoME) in 1949 to outline the professional duties of physicians to patients, other physicians and health professionals, themselves and society as a whole. The ICoME recently underwent a major 4-year revision process, culminating in its unanimous adoption by the WMA General Assembly in October 2022 in Berlin. This article describes and discusses the ICoME, its revision process, the controversial and uncontroversial issues, and the broad consensus achieved among WMA constituent members, representing over 10 million physicians worldwide. The authors analyse the ICoME, including its response to contemporary changes and challenges like ethical plurality and globalisation, in light of ethical theories and approaches, reaching the conclusion that the document is a good example of international ethical professional self-regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramin W Parsa-Parsi
- Department for International Affairs, German Medical Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Raanan Gillon
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Urban Wiesing
- Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, University of Tübingen, Tubingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Accoe D, Segers S. 'False hope' in assisted reproduction: the normative significance of the external outlook and moral negotiation. J Med Ethics 2024; 50:181-184. [PMID: 37137697 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-108916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Despite the frequent invocation of 'false hope' and possible related moral concerns in the context of assisted reproduction technologies, a focused ethical and conceptual problematisation of this concept seems to be lacking. We argue that an invocation of 'false hope' only makes sense if the fulfilment of a desired outcome (eg, a successful fertility treatment) is impossible, and if it is attributed from an external perspective. The evaluation incurred by this third party may foreclose a given perspective from being an object of hope. However, this evaluation is not a mere statistical calculation or observation based on probabilities but is dependent on several factors that should be acknowledgeable as morally relevant. This is important because it allows room for, and encourages, reasoned disagreement and moral negotiation. Accordingly, the object of hope itself, whether or not based on socially embedded desires or practices, can be a topic of debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorian Accoe
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Bioethics Institute Ghent & Metamedica, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Seppe Segers
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Bioethics Institute Ghent & Metamedica, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, CAPHRI & GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pennings S, Symons X. First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics. J Med Ethics 2024; 50:212-218. [PMID: 35177422 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Respect for patient autonomy is a central principle of medical ethics. However, there are important unresolved questions about the characteristics of an autonomous decision, and whether some autonomous preferences should be subject to more scrutiny than others.In this paper, we consider whether inappropriately adaptive preferences-preferences that are based on and that may perpetuate social injustice-should be categorised as autonomous in a way that gives them normative authority. Some philosophers have argued that inappropriately adaptive preferences do not have normative authority, because they are only a reflection of a person's social context and not of their true self. Under this view, medical professionals who refuse to carry out actions which are based on inappropriately adaptive preferences are not in fact violating their patient's autonomy. However, we argue that it is very difficult to articulate a systematic and principled distinction between normal autonomous preferences and inappropriately adaptive preferences, especially if this distinction needs to be useful for clinicians in real-life situations. This makes it difficult to argue that inappropriately adaptive preferences are straightforwardly non-autonomous.Given this problem, we argue that there are significant theoretical issues with contemporary understandings of autonomy in bioethics. We discuss what this might mean for the practice of medicine and for medical ethics education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Pennings
- School of Philosophy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Xavier Symons
- Plunkett Centre for Ethics, Australian Catholic University and St Vincent's Health Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Canada has recently published a new Clinical Practice Guideline on the diagnosis and management of brain death. It states that consent is not necessary to carry out the interventions required to make the diagnosis. A supporting article not only sets out the arguments for this but also contends that 'UK laws similarly carve out an exception, excusing clinicians from a prima facie duty to get consent'. This is supplemented by the claim that recent court decisions in the UK similarly confirm that consent is not required, referencing two judgements in Battersbee We disagree with the authors' interpretation of the law on consent in the UK and argue that there is nothing in Battersbee to support the conclusion that consent to testing is not necessary. Where there is a disagreement about testing for brain death in the UK, court authorisation is required.
Collapse
|
7
|
McNamee M, Anderson LC, Borry P, Camporesi S, Derman W, Holm S, Knox TR, Leuridan B, Loland S, Lopez Frias FJ, Lorusso L, Malcolm D, McArdle D, Partridge B, Schramme T, Weed M. Sport-related concussion research agenda beyond medical science: culture, ethics, science, policy. J Med Ethics 2024:jme-2022-108812. [PMID: 36868564 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The Concussion in Sport Group guidelines have successfully brought the attention of brain injuries to the global medical and sport research communities, and has significantly impacted brain injury-related practices and rules of international sport. Despite being the global repository of state-of-the-art science, diagnostic tools and guides to clinical practice, the ensuing consensus statements remain the object of ethical and sociocultural criticism. The purpose of this paper is to bring to bear a broad range of multidisciplinary challenges to the processes and products of sport-related concussion movement. We identify lacunae in scientific research and clinical guidance in relation to age, disability, gender and race. We also identify, through multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary analysis, a range of ethical problems resulting from conflicts of interest, processes of attributing expertise in sport-related concussion, unjustifiably narrow methodological control and insufficient athlete engagement in research and policy development. We argue that the sport and exercise medicine community need to augment the existing research and practice foci to understand these problems more holistically and, in turn, provide guidance and recommendations that help sport clinicians better care for brain-injured athletes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike McNamee
- Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Silvia Camporesi
- Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Political Sciences, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Wayne Derman
- Institute of Sport & Exercise Medicine, Dept of Exercise, Sport & Lifestyle Medicine, Facuty of Medicine & Health Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
- IOC Research Center, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Soren Holm
- Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Bert Leuridan
- Centre for Philosophical Psychology, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Sigmund Loland
- Department of Sport and Social Sciences, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Ludovica Lorusso
- Departament de Psicologia Social, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dominic Malcolm
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | | | - Brad Partridge
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Thomas Schramme
- Department of Philosophy, University of Liverpool Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mike Weed
- Centre for Sport, Physical Education & Activity Research (spear), Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jesudason E. Reducing the risk of NHS disasters. J Med Ethics 2024:jme-2023-109534. [PMID: 37923371 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
How could we better use public inquiries to stem the recurrence of healthcare failures? The question seems ever relevant, prompted this time by the inquiry into how former nurse Letby was able to murder newborns under National Health Service care. While criminality, like Letby's, can be readily condemned, other factors like poor leadership and culture seem more often regretted than reformed. I would argue this is where inquiries struggle, in the space between ethics and law-with what is awful but lawful. In response, we should learn from progress with informed consent. Inquiries and civil litigation have seen uninformed 'consent' shift from being undesirable to unlawful. If better leadership and culture were sole drivers here, we would likely be doing far better in many other areas of healthcare too. Instead, one could argue that progress on consent has been made by reducing epistemic injustice-by naming and addressing epistemic issues in ways that enhance social power for patients. If this is an ingredient that transforms clinician-patient working, might it also shift conduct within other key relationships, by showing up what else should become unlawful and why? Naming medical paternalism may have helped with consent reform, so I continue this approach, first naming two areas of epistemic injustice: management feudalism and legal chokeholds Remedies are then considered, including the democratisation of management and reforms to legal ethics, legislation and litigation. In brief, public inquiries may improve if they also target epistemic injustices that should become unlawful. Focus on informed consent and epistemic relationships has improved the medical profession. Likewise, it could help healthcare leaders shift from fiat towards consent, and their lawyers from a stifling professional secrecy towards the kind of candour a prudent public expects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin Jesudason
- Rehabilitation Medicine, NHS Lothian, Astley Ainslie Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
In the paper 'COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk-benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities,' Bardosh et al argued that college mandates of the COVID-19 booster vaccine are unethical. The authors came to this conclusion by performing three different sets of comparisons of benefits versus risks using referenced data and argued that the harm outweighs the risk in all three cases. In this response article, we argue that the authors frame their arguments by comparing values that are not scientifically or reasonably comparable and that the authors used values that represent grossly different risk profiles and grouped them into a set of figures to create an illusion of fair comparisons. We argue that absent the falsely skewed portrayals of a higher level of risk over benefit in their misrepresented figures, the five ethical arguments they presented completely fall apart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leo L Lam
- CoMotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Taylor Nichols
- Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marks IR, Mills C, Devolder K. Unconditional access to non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for adult-onset conditions: a defence. J Med Ethics 2024; 50:102-107. [PMID: 37137695 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been adopted into routine obstetric care to screen for fetal sex, trisomies 21, 18 and 13, sex chromosome aneuploidies and fetal sex determination. It is predicted that the scope of NIPT will be expanded in the future, including screening for adult-onset conditions (AOCs). Some ethicists have proposed that using NIPT to detect severe autosomal AOCs that cannot be prevented or treated, such as Huntington's disease, should only be offered to prospective parents who intend to terminate a pregnancy in the case of a positive result. We refer to this as the 'conditional access model' (CAM) for NIPT. We argue against CAM for NIPT to screen for Huntington's disease or any other AOC. Next, we present results from a study we conducted in Australia that explored NIPT users' attitudes regarding CAM in the context of NIPT for AOCs. We found that, despite overall support for NIPT for AOCs, most participants were not in favour of CAM for both preventable and non-preventable AOCs. Our findings are discussed in relation to our initial theoretical ethical theory and with other comparable empirical studies. We conclude that an 'unconditional access model' (UAM), which provides unrestricted access to NIPT for AOCs, is a morally preferable alternative that avoids both CAM's fundamental practical limitations and the limitations it places on parents' reproductive autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- India R Marks
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catherine Mills
- Monash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katrien Devolder
- The Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Teo MTL. Why the irremediability requirement is not sufficient to deny psychiatric euthanasia for patients with treatment-resistant depression. J Med Ethics 2024:jme-2023-109644. [PMID: 38216330 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) holds centrality in many debates regarding psychiatric euthanasia. Among the strongest reasons cited by opponents of psychiatric euthanasia is the uncertainty behind the irremediability of psychiatric illnesses. According to this argument, conditions that cannot be considered irremediable imply that there are possible remedies that remain for the condition. If there are possible remedies that remain for the condition, then patients with that condition cannot be considered for access to euthanasia. I call this the irremediability requirement (IR). I argue that patients with TRD can, indeed, meet the operationalisation of irremediability in the IR. This is because the irremediability it asks for is not some global or absolute irremediability, but rather a present irremediability based on the current state of medical science. I show this by considering irremediability relating to (1) possible future treatments and (2) not trying presently available alternative treatments. I extend Schuklenk nd van de Vathorst's argument from parity to terminal malignancies, to show that (1) is an unreasonable expectation for all cases of euthanasia. Taking (2) as a more serious opponent to psychiatric euthanasia, I show how the IR, based on how it is presently operationalised, can be realistically applied to cases of TRD. I do this by further developing Tully's argument on broad-sense treatment resistance with the robust empirical data from the STAR*D trials. If my argument from Tully's is valid, then we have reasons to, again, seek parity between the operationalisations of irremediability in terminal malignancies and TRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus T L Teo
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kawano B. Constructing a South Asian cardiovascular disease: a qualitative analysis on how researchers study cardiovascular disease in South Asians. J Med Ethics 2023; 50:70-74. [PMID: 35277467 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Debates on the use of race in biomedical research have typically overlooked immigrant groups outside of the black-white racial dichotomy. Recent biomedical research on South Asians and cardiovascular disease provides an opportunity to understand how scientists define race and interpret racial health disparities from an underexamined perspective. PURPOSE To examine how researchers in the Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) study defined a South Asian population, and then compared health differences between South Asians and other populations. METHODS Qualitative content analysis was performed on eleven articles from August 2013 to January 2021 that directly compared the South Asian cohort in MASALA to four other groups. The MASALA study design article was also included in this analysis. Articles were analysed for how South Asians were defined, and for how health differences between South Asians and other populations were studied and discussed. RESULTS Researchers in MASALA were neither clear nor precise in defining South Asians as either an ancestral group or ethnic group. Their studies also prioritised investigating genetic and molecular causes of the cardiovascular health disparity between South Asians and other populations and failed to examine possible social factors. CONCLUSIONS These findings reflect a broader trend in biomedical research in which race and racial health disparities are poorly defined and studied, limiting scientists' understanding of the relationship between race and health. I propose methodologies to help researchers define populations and design studies without relying on biologically reductive assumptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley Kawano
- Trent Center for Bioethics, Humanities, and History of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kerasidou CX, Malone M, Daly A, Tava F. Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:838-843. [PMID: 36997310 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Digitalisation of health and the use of health data in artificial intelligence, and machine learning (ML), including for applications that will then in turn be used in healthcare are major themes permeating current UK and other countries' healthcare systems and policies. Obtaining rich and representative data is key for robust ML development, and UK health data sets are particularly attractive sources for this. However, ensuring that such research and development is in the public interest, produces public benefit and preserves privacy are key challenges. Trusted research environments (TREs) are positioned as a way of balancing the diverging interests in healthcare data research with privacy and public benefit. Using TRE data to train ML models presents various challenges to the balance previously struck between these societal interests, which have hitherto not been discussed in the literature. These challenges include the possibility of personal data being disclosed in ML models, the dynamic nature of ML models and how public benefit may be (re)conceived in this context. For ML research to be facilitated using UK health data, TREs and others involved in the UK health data policy ecosystem need to be aware of these issues and work to address them in order to continue to ensure a 'safe' health and care data environment that truly serves the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maeve Malone
- Dundee Law School, School of Humanities Social Sciences and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Angela Daly
- Leverhulme Research Centre for Forensic Science, School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Miller E, Tang Girdwood S, Shah A, Anyigbo C, Lanphier E. Professionalism or prejudice? Modelling roles, risking microaggressions. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:822-823. [PMID: 37460204 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Miller
- Division of Neonatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Sonya Tang Girdwood
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Anita Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Chidiogo Anyigbo
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Elizabeth Lanphier
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Ethics Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang VMY, Baigrie B. Caring as the unacknowledged matrix of evidence-based nursing. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2023-109472. [PMID: 37968107 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we explicate evidence-based nursing (EBN), critically appraise its framework and respond to nurses' concern that EBN sidelines the caring elements of nursing practice. We use resources from care ethics, especially Vrinda Dalmiya's work that considers care as crucial for both epistemology and ethics, to show how EBN is compatible with, and indeed can be enhanced by, the caring aspects of nursing practice. We demonstrate that caring can act as a bridge between 'external' evidence and the other pillars of the EBN framework: clinical expertise; patient preferences and values. Drawing on an influential EBN handbook, section 1 presents the aims and features of EBN, including the normative principle that EBN should take place within a 'context of caring'. We aim to understand this context and whether it can be neatly detached from the EBN framework, as the handbook seems to suggest. In section 2, we highlight the grounds for resistance to EBN from the nursing community, before mounting the argument that nursing practices can be understood fruitfully through feminist care ethics and/or virtue ethics lenses. In section 3, we deepen that analysis using Dalmiya's concepts of care-knowing and care as a hybrid ethico-epistemic virtue, which are ideally suited to the complex practices of nursing. In section 4, we bring this rich understanding of care into conversation with EBN, showing that its framework cannot be adequately theorised without paying proper attention to care. Caring can be neither an innocuous background assumption of nor an afterthought to the EBN framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian Baigrie
- Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Braun E. Reasons for providing assisted suicide and the expressivist objection: a response to Donaldson. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2023-109697. [PMID: 37968104 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
According to the expressivist objection, laws that only allow assisted dying for those suffering from certain medical conditions express the judgement that their lives are not worth living. I have recently argued that an autonomy-based approach that legally allows assisted suicide for all who make an autonomous request is a way to avoid the expressivist objection. In response to this, Thomas Donaldson has argued that rather than avoiding the expressivist objection, an autonomy-based approach extends this objection. According to Donaldson, this is because helping a person achieve a goal requires endorsement of that goal. In this reply, I show that Donaldson misunderstands the target of the expressivist objection: it is not aimed at an individual's attitude towards another person's death but rather at a legal regulation. Moreover, helping someone end their life does not necessarily require endorsing this goal-instead, respect for a person's autonomous choice can be another reason for providing assisted suicide. Donaldson also assumes that the autonomy-based approach requires doctors to accept autonomous requests for assisted dying. Yet, this approach merely makes it legal for individuals (not necessarily only doctors) to provide assisted suicide to autonomous persons but does not require anyone to do so.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Braun
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Donaldson T. Suicide booths and assistance without moral expression: a response to Braun. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2023-109623. [PMID: 37863648 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
In a recent paper, Braun argued for an autonomy-based approach to assisted suicide as a way to avoid the expressivist objection to assisted dying laws. In this paper, I will argue that an autonomy-based approach actually extends the expressivist objection to assisted dying because it is not possible for one agent to assist another in pursuit of a goal without expressing that it would be good for that goal to come about. Braun argued that assisted dying should be viewed purely as an individual's autonomous action, but this requires the assistance of the medical professional to be understood as that of a non-moral automaton, such as a suicide booth. Instead, it will be argued that a beneficent motivation to promote human flourishing provides moral reasons for both non-interference in the actions, for example, suicide, of competent agents and for considering whether assisting another agent with their goal will promote their flourishing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Donaldson
- School of Law, University of Manchester Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Browne TK, Lederman Z. Incentivising civility in clinical environments. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:683-684. [PMID: 37433664 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Kayali Browne
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Practical and Public Ethics Research Group, Faculty of Arts, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Zohar Lederman
- Medical Ethics and Humanities Unit, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Smith AP. Abandoning the Dead Donor Rule. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:707-714. [PMID: 36192142 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2021-108049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The Dead Donor Rule is intended to protect the public and patients, but it remains contentious. Here, I argue that we can abandon the Dead Donor Rule. Using Joel Feinberg's account of harm, I argue that, in most cases, particularly when patients consent to being organ donors, death does not harm permanently unconscious (PUC) patients. In these cases, then, causing the death of PUC patients is not morally wrong. This undermines the strongest argument for the Dead Donor Rule-that doctors ought not kill their patients. Thus, there is nothing wrong with abandoning the Dead Donor Rule with regard to PUC patients. Importantly, the harm-based argument defended here allows us to sidestep the thorny debate surrounding definitions of death. What matters is not when a patient dies but whether their death constitutes some further harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Smith
- Philosophy, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- English and Philosophy, Snow College, Ephraim, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Parker J, Hodson N, Young P, Shelton C. How should institutions help clinicians to practise greener anaesthesia: first-order and second-order responsibilities to practice sustainably. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2023-109442. [PMID: 37734908 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
There is a need for all industries, including healthcare, to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. In anaesthetic practice, this not only requires a reduction in resource use and waste, but also a shift away from inhaled anaesthetic gases and towards alternatives with a lower carbon footprint. As inhalational anaesthesia produces greenhouse gas emissions at the point of use, achieving sustainable anaesthetic practice involves individual practitioner behaviour change. However, changing the practice of healthcare professionals raises potential ethical issues. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, we discuss what moral duties anaesthetic practitioners have when it comes to practices that impact the environment. We argue that behaviour change among practitioners to align with certain moral responsibilities must be supplemented with an account of institutional duties to support this. In other words, we argue that institutions and those in power have second-order responsibilities to ensure that practitioners can fulfil their first-order responsibilities to practice more sustainably. The second goal of the paper is to consider not just the nature of second-order responsibilities but the content. We assess four different ways that second-order responsibilities might be fulfilled within healthcare systems: removing certain anaesthetic agents, seeking consensus, education and methods from behavioural economics. We argue that, while each of these are a necessary part of the picture, some interventions like nudges have considerable advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Parker
- Medical School, Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster, UK
| | - Nathan Hodson
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Paul Young
- North West School of Anaesthesia, Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK
| | - Clifford Shelton
- Medical School, Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster, UK
- Department of Anaesthesia, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wren B, Ruck Keene A. Can the courts be viewed as an appropriate vehicle to settle clinical unease? J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2023-109260. [PMID: 37620135 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
This paper is an exploration of the state of 'clinical unease' experienced by clinicians in contexts where professional judgement-grounded in clinical knowledge, critical reflection and a sound grasp of the law-indicates that there is more than one ethically defensible way to proceed. The question posed is whether the courts can be viewed as an appropriate vehicle to settle clinical unease by providing a ruling that clarifies the legal and ethical issues arising in the case, even in situations where there is no dispute between the patient (or her proxies) and the healthcare team.The concept of 'clinical unease' is framed with reference to the broader experience of clinical decision-making, and distinguished from other widely discussed phenomena in the healthcare literature like moral distress and conscientious objection. A number of reported cases are briefly examined where the courts were invited to rule in circumstances of apparent 'unease'. The respective responsibilities of clinicians and courts are discussed: in particular, their capability and readiness to respond to matters of ethical concern.Four imagined clinical scenarios are outlined where a clinical team might welcome a court adjudication, under current rules. Consideration is given to the likelihood of such cases being heard, and to whether there may be better remedies than the courts. There are final reflections on what clinicians may actually wish for in seeking court involvement, and on whether a willingness to engage with the experience of clinical unease may lead to greater sensitivity towards the value perspectives of others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernadette Wren
- Children, Young Adults and Families Directorate, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexander Ruck Keene
- 39 Essex Chambers, London, UK
- Dickson Poon School of Law, Kings College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Geiger S, McMahon A. Analysis of the institutional landscape and proliferation of proposals for global vaccine equity for COVID-19: too many cooks or too many recipes? J Med Ethics 2023; 49:583-590. [PMID: 34848492 PMCID: PMC8635883 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
This article outlines and compares current and proposed global institutional mechanisms to increase equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines, focusing on their institutional and operational complementarities and overlaps. It specifically considers the World Health Organization's (WHO's) COVAX (COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access) model as part of the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-A) initiative, the WHO's COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP) initiative, the proposed TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Agreement) intellectual property waiver and other proposed WHO and World Trade Organization technology transfer proposals. We argue that while various individual mechanisms each have their specific individual merits-and in some cases weaknesses-overall, many of these current and proposed mechanisms could be highly complementary if used together to deliver equitable global access to vaccines. Nonetheless, we also argue that there are risks posed by the proliferation of proposals in this context, including the potential to disperse stakeholder attention or to delay decisive action. Therefore, we argue that there is now a clear need for concerted global multilateral action to recognise the complementarities of specific models and to provide a pathway for collaboration in attaining global equitable access to vaccines. The institutional infrastructure or proposals to achieve this amply exist at this point in time-but much greater cooperation from industry and clear, decisive and coordinated action from states and international organisations are urgently needed.
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Nguyen
- Institute for Bioethics & Health Humanities, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Riaz S. Sabr and Shukr: doing justice to medical futility. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2022-108687. [PMID: 37487626 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Riaz
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
DiDanieli M. Autonomy is not a sufficient basis for analysing the choice for medical assistance in dying in unjust conditions: in favour of a dignity-based approach. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2023-109284. [PMID: 37414540 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
In their paper titled Choosing death in unjust conditions: hope, autonomy and harm reduction, Wiebe and Mullin argue against the stance of diminished autonomy in chronically ill, disabled patients living in unjust sociopolitical environments who pursue medical assistance in dying (MAiD). They suggest that it would be paternalistic to deny these people this choice and conclude that MAiD should actually be seen as a form of harm reduction for them.This response to their article argues that basing discussions surrounding this important topic on a single bioethical concept does not address the needs of this cohort and is restrictively siloed. The discussion should include considerations of human rights and the need for legislative reforms to address social conditions, in addition to traditional bioethical principles. Work in this area needs to become interdisciplinary and collaborative as well as integrate input from the patients themselves. The concept of the dignity of these patients, in its broadest sense, needs to be infused into the discussion in order to optimise the exploration for solutions for this cohort.The stance of MAiD as harm reduction, in this context, does not meet the definition of harm reduction, nor does it represent a commitment to the best interests of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria DiDanieli
- Burlington Family Health Team, Burlington Ontario Health Team, Burlington, Ontario, Canada
- Edinburgh School of Law, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Horton RH, Macken WL, Pitceathly RDS, Lucassen AM. Discussion of off-target and tentative genomic findings may sometimes be necessary to allow evaluation of their clinical significance. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2023-109108. [PMID: 37339848 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
We discuss a case where clinical genomic investigation of muscle weakness unexpectedly found a genetic variant that might (or might not) predispose to kidney cancer. We argue that despite its off-target and uncertain nature, this variant should be discussed with the man who had the test, not because it is medical information, but because this discussion would allow the further clinical evaluation that might lead it to becoming so. We argue that while prominent ethical debates around genomics often take 'results' as a starting point and ask questions as to whether to look for and how to react to them, the construction of genomic results is fraught with ethical complexity, although often couched as a primarily technical problem. We highlight the need for greater focus on, and appreciation of, the ethical work undertaken daily by scientists and clinicians working in genomic medicine and discuss how public conversations around genomics need to adapt to prepare future patients for potentially uncertain and unexpected outcomes from clinical genomic tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel H Horton
- Clinical Ethics, Law and Society, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Personalised Medicine, St Anne's College, Oxford, UK
- Clinical Ethics, Law and Society, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - William L Macken
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK
- Queen Square Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, NHS Highly Specialised Service for Rare Mitochondrial Disorders, London, UK
| | - Robert D S Pitceathly
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK
- Queen Square Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, NHS Highly Specialised Service for Rare Mitochondrial Disorders, London, UK
| | - Anneke M Lucassen
- Clinical Ethics, Law and Society, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Personalised Medicine, St Anne's College, Oxford, UK
- Clinical Ethics, Law and Society, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wagner IA. Ethical theories as multiple models. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:444-446. [PMID: 36517227 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Hardman and Hutchinson claim that ethics is 'grounded in particular, everyday concerns'. According to them, an implication of this is that ethics courses for (future) clinicians should de-emphasise teaching the theories and principles of philosophical ethics and focus instead on pedagogical activities more closely related to everyday concerns, for example, exposure to real patient accounts. I respond that, even if ethics is an 'everyday' phenomenon, learning philosophical ethics may be of significant practical benefit to clinicians. I argue that the theories of philosophical ethics can reasonably be interpreted as partial, simplified descriptions-or models-of moral phenomena, and that they can be effectively deployed in tandem by clinicians as complementary decision-making tools for help in navigating ethically complex situations in the clinic.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Is it ethical for doctors or courts to prevent patients from making choices that will cause significant harm to themselves in the future? According to an important liberal principle the only justification for infringing the liberty of an individual is to prevent harm to others; harm to the self does not suffice.In this paper, I explore Derek Parfit's arguments that blur the sharp line between harm to self and others. I analyse cases of treatment refusal by capacitous patients and describe different forms of paternalism arising from a reductionist view of personal identity. I outline an Identity Relative Paternalistic Intervention Principle for determining when we should disallow refusal of treatment where the harm will be accrued by a future self, and consider objections including vagueness and non-identity.Identity relative paternalism does not always justify intervention to prevent harm to future selves. However, there is a stronger ethical case for doing so than is often recognised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Wilkinson
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Newborn Care, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Winkler EC, Jungkunz M, Thorogood A, Lotz V, Schickhardt C. Patient data for commercial companies? An ethical framework for sharing patients' data with for-profit companies for research. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2022-108781. [PMID: 37230744 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research using data from medical care promises to advance medical science and improve healthcare. Academia is not the only sector that expects such research to be of great benefit. The research-based health industry is also interested in so-called 'real-world' health data to develop new drugs, medical technologies or data-based health applications. While access to medical data is handled very differently in different countries, and some empirical data suggest people are uncomfortable with the idea of companies accessing health information, this paper aims to advance the ethical debate about secondary use of medical data generated in the public healthcare sector by for-profit companies for medical research (ReuseForPro). METHODS We first clarify some basic concepts and our ethical-normative approach, then discuss and ethically evaluate potential claims and interests of relevant stakeholders: patients as data subjects in the public healthcare system, for-profit companies, the public, and physicians and their healthcare institutions. Finally, we address the tensions between legitimate claims of different stakeholders in order to suggest conditions that might ensure ethically sound ReuseForPro. RESULTS We conclude that there are good reasons to grant for-profit companies access to medical data if they meet certain conditions: among others they need to respect patients' informational rights and their actions need to be compatible with the public's interest in health benefit from ReuseForPro.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva C Winkler
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Jungkunz
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Vincent Lotz
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Schickhardt
- Section for Translational Medical Ethics, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ferlito B, De Proost M. Ubuntu as a complementary perspective for addressing epistemic (in)justice in medical machine learning. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2023-109097. [PMID: 37188508 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon Ferlito
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Michiel De Proost
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pennings G. Lowering the age limit of access to the identity of the gamete donor by donor offspring: the argument against. J Med Ethics 2023:jme-2023-108935. [PMID: 37130757 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-108935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Countries that abolished donor anonymity have imposed age limits for access to certain types of information by donor offspring. In the UK and the Netherlands, a debate has started on whether these age limits should be lowered or abolished all together. This article presents some arguments against lowering the age limits as a general rule for all donor children. The focus is on whether one should give a child the right to obtain the identity of the donor at an earlier age than is presently stipulated. The first argument is that there is no evidence that a change in age will increase the total well-being of the donor offspring as a group. The second argument stresses that the rights language used for the donor-conceived child isolates the child from his or her family and this is unlikely to be in the best interest of the child. Finally, lowering the age limit reintroduces the genetic father in the family and expresses the bionormative ideology that contradicts gamete donation as a practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Pennings
- Philosophy and Moral Science, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cahill JM, Kinghorn W, Dugdale L. Repairing moral injury takes a team: what clinicians can learn from combat veterans. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:361-366. [PMID: 35705446 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2022-108163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Moral injury results from the violation of deeply held moral commitments leading to emotional and existential distress. The phenomenon was initially described by psychologists and psychiatrists associated with the US Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs but has since been applied more broadly. Although its application to healthcare preceded COVID-19, healthcare professionals have taken greater interest in moral injury since the pandemic's advent. They have much to learn from combat veterans, who have substantial experience in identifying and addressing moral injury-particularly its social dimensions. Veterans recognise that complex social factors lead to moral injury, and therefore a community approach is necessary for healing. We argue that similar attention must be given in healthcare, where a team-oriented and multidimensional approach is essential both for ameliorating the suffering faced by health professionals and for addressing the underlying causes that give rise to moral injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Cahill
- Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Warren Kinghorn
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Divinity School, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lydia Dugdale
- Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Emmerich N. Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:189-195. [PMID: 35260478 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Some contributions to the current literature on conscience objection in healthcare posit the notion that the requirement to refer patients to a non-objecting provider is a morally questionable undertaking in need of explanation. The issue is that providing a referral renders those who conscientiously object to being involved in a particular intervention complicit in its provision. This essay seeks to engage with such claims and argues that referrals can be construed in terms of what Harman calls morally permissible moral mistakes. I go on to suggest that one might frame the (in)actions of those who exercise the right of non-participation generated by the claim to conscientiously object in similar terms; they can also be considered morally permissible moral mistakes. Finally, and given that the arguments already advanced involve simultaneously looking at the same issue from competing ethical perspectives, I offer some brief remarks that support viewing conscientious objection as an ethicopolitical device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Emmerich
- School of Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Institute of Ethics, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tretter M, Samhammer D. For the sake of multifacetedness. Why artificial intelligence patient preference prediction systems shouldn't be for next of kin. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:175-176. [PMID: 36627200 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Max Tretter
- Insitute for Systematic Theology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| | - David Samhammer
- Insitute for Systematic Theology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jesudason E. Fracking our humanity. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:181-182. [PMID: 36635067 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
|
36
|
Hoffman TW, Baker JF. Navigating our way through a hospital ransomware attack: ethical considerations in delivering acute orthopaedic care. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:121-124. [PMID: 35197299 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Ransomware attacks on healthcare systems are becoming more prevalent globally. In May 2021, Waikato District Health Board in New Zealand was devastated by a major attack that crippled its information technology system. The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery faced a number of challenges to the way they delivered care including, patient assessment and investigations, the deferral of elective surgery, and communication and patient confidentiality. These issues are explored through the lens of the four key principles of medical ethics in the hope that they will provide some guidance to future departments who may experience such attacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph Frederick Baker
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Parker J. Barriers to green inhaler prescribing: ethical issues in environmentally sustainable clinical practice. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:92-98. [PMID: 35981864 PMCID: PMC9887388 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The National Health Service (NHS) was the first healthcare system globally to declare ambitions to become net carbon zero. To achieve this, a shift away from metered-dose inhalers which contain powerful greenhouse gases is necessary. Many patients can use dry powder inhalers which do not contain greenhouse gases and are equally effective at managing respiratory disease. This paper discusses the ethical issues that arise as the NHS attempts to mitigate climate change. Two ethical issues that pose a barrier to moving away from metered-dose inhalers are considered: patients who decline an inhaler with a smaller carbon footprint and increased cost. I argue that while a patient is not morally justified in refusing a more environmentally sustainable inhaler due to the expected harms, a doctor may still prescribe a metered-dose inhaler if they believe that switching without consent might undermine trust or substantially worsen the patient's health. Turning to cost, I argue that the imperative to combat climate change means the NHS should accept small increased financial costs for lower carbon inhalers, even though this provides no additional direct benefit for the patient. I then go on to consider the implications of the preceding analysis for policy and practice. I argue for a policy that minimises the impact of inhalers on the climate by advocating for a principle of environmental prescribing and explore decision-making in practice. While the arguments here pertain primarily to inhalers, the discussion has broader implications for debates around healthcare's responsibility to be environmentally sustainable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Parker
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Almost any medicine can be purchased online from abroad. Many high-income countries permit individuals to import medicines for their personal use. However, those who import medicines face the risk of purchasing poor-quality products that may not work, or that may even harm them. Many people are willing to accept this risk for the opportunity to purchase more affordable medicines. This is especially true of individuals from low socioeconomic backgrounds who already struggle to afford the medicines they need if they are not subsidised by insurers or if copayments are high. As medicine prices and out-of-pocket healthcare spending continue to climb, the online marketplace provides an important alternative for individuals in high-income countries to source medicines. In this article, I argue that doctors have a responsibility to help patients access medicines online and I propose a framework that can be used to facilitate responsible personal importation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narcyz Ghinea
- Philosophy Department, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Agency, Values and Ethics, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Since the publication of the successful animal trials of the Biobag, a prototypical extrauterine support for extremely premature neonates, numerous ethicists have debated the potential implications of such a device. Some have argued that the Biobag represents a natural evolution of traditional newborn intensive care, while others believe that the Biobag would create a new class of being for the patients housed within. Kingma and Finn argued in Bioethics for making a categorical distinction between fetuses, newborns and 'gestatelings' in a Biobag on the basis of a conceptual distinction between ectogenesis versus ectogestation. Applying their arguments to the clinical realities of newborn intensive care, however, demonstrates the inapplicability of their ideas to the practice of medicine. Here, I present three clinical examples of the difficulty and confusion their argument would create for clinicians and offer a possible remedy: namely, discarding the term 'artificial womb' in favour of 'Biobag'.
Collapse
|
40
|
Ignatowicz A, Slowther AM, Bassford C, Griffiths F, Johnson S, Rees K. Evaluating interventions to improve ethical decision making in clinical practice: a review of the literature and reflections on the challenges posed. J Med Ethics 2023; 49:136-142. [PMID: 35241628 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Since the 1980s, there has been an increasing acknowledgement of the importance of recognising the ethical dimension of clinical decision-making. Medical professional regulatory authorities in some countries now include ethical knowledge and practice in their required competencies for undergraduate and post graduate medical training. Educational interventions and clinical ethics support services have been developed to support and improve ethical decision making in clinical practice, but research evaluating the effectiveness of these interventions has been limited. We undertook a systematic review of the published literature on measures or models of evaluation used to assess the impact of interventions to improve ethical decision making in clinical care. We identified a range of measures to evaluate educational interventions, and one tool used to evaluate a clinical ethics support intervention. Most measures did not evaluate the key impact of interest, that is the quality of ethical decision making in real-world clinical practice. We describe the results of our review and reflect on the challenges of assessing ethical decision making in clinical practice that face both developers of educational and support interventions and the regulatory organisations that set and assess competency standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christopher Bassford
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
- University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | - Karen Rees
- University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Soofi H. What moral work can Nussbaum's account of human dignity do in the context of dementia care? J Med Ethics 2022; 48:961-967. [PMID: 35922119 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2021-108095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Appeals to the dignity of people with dementia are widespread in the current literature on dementia care. One influential account of dignity in the wider philosophical and bioethical literature that has remained underexplored in the context of dementia care is that of Martha Nussbaum. This paper critically examines Nussbaum's account of dignity and aims to determine what moral guidance this account can offer for the provision of care to people with dementia. To that end, first, I identify four possible objections to appeals to dignity in dementia care. These objections are (1) redundancy of the dignity talk, (2) exclusionary implications, (3) reliance on (suspect forms of) speciesism and (4) unclear practical implications. Then, I discuss whether, and to what extent, Nussbaum's account of dignity can overcome these objections. I argue that Nussbaum's account, in its original form, struggles to overcome the problem of exclusionary implications and consequently the problem of unclear practical implications. I argue for a modified version of Nussbaum's account of dignity. I demonstrate that this modified version can better overcome all of the four objections, and it provides relatively clearer moral guidance for the provision of care to people with dementia. The modified version of Nussbaum's account is predicated on a novel dementia-specific model of flourishing, which draws on Kitwood and Bredin's empirically informed list of indicators of well-being for people with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hojjat Soofi
- Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kok N, Zegers M, Hoedemaekers C, van Gurp J. Culture, normativity and morisprudence: a response to the commentaries. J Med Ethics 2022; 48:985-986. [PMID: 36442976 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Niek Kok
- IQ healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marieke Zegers
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Cornelia Hoedemaekers
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Jelle van Gurp
- IQ healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
John SD. How low can you go? Justified hesitancy and the ethics of childhood vaccination against COVID-19. J Med Ethics 2022; 48:1006-1009. [PMID: 35217530 PMCID: PMC8914403 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-108097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
This paper explores some of the ethical issues around offering COVID-19 vaccines to children. My main conclusion is rather paradoxical: the younger we go, the stronger the grounds for justified parental hesitancy and, as such, the stronger the arguments for enforcing vaccination. I suggest that this is not the reductio ad absurdum it appears, but does point to difficult questions about the nature of parental authority in vaccination cases. The first section sketches the disagreement over vaccinating teenagers, arguing that the UK policy was permissible. The second section outlines a problem for this policy, that it faces justified vaccine hesitancy. The third section discusses three strategies for responding to this problem, arguing that there may be no simple way of overcoming parents' reasons to resist vaccinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen David John
- History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Schmidt H, Shaikh SJ, Sadecki E, Buttenheim A, Gollust S. Public attitudes about equitable COVID-19 vaccine allocation: a randomised experiment of race-based versus novel place-based frames. J Med Ethics 2022; 48:993-999. [PMID: 35927020 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Equity was-and is-central in the US policy response to COVID-19, given its disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities of colour. In an unprecedented turn, the majority of US states used place-based disadvantage indices to promote equity in vaccine allocation (eg, through larger vaccine shares for more disadvantaged areas and people of colour).We conducted a nationally representative survey experiment (n=2003) in April 2021 (before all US residents had become vaccine eligible), that examined respondents' perceptions of the acceptability of disadvantage indices relative to two ways of prioritising racial and ethnic groups more directly, and assessed the role of framing and expert anchors in shaping perceptions.A majority of respondents supported the use of disadvantage indices, and one-fifth opposed any of the three equity-promoting plans. Differences in support and opposition were identified by respondents' political party affiliation. Providing a numerical anchor (that indicated expert recommendations and states' actual practices in reserving a proportion of allocations for prioritised groups) led respondents to prefer a lower distribution of reserved vaccine allocations compared with the randomised condition without this anchor, and the effect of the anchor differed across the frames.Our findings support ongoing uses of disadvantage indices in vaccine allocation, and, by extension, in allocating tests, masks or treatments, especially when supply cannot meet demand. The findings can also inform US allocation frameworks in future pandemic planning, and could provide lessons on how to promote equity in clinical and public health outside of the pandemic setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Schmidt
- Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sonia Jawaid Shaikh
- Amsterdam School of Communication of Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emily Sadecki
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alison Buttenheim
- Department of Family and Community Health, Penn Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarah Gollust
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Winters JP, Owens F, Winters E. Dirty work: well-intentioned mental health workers cannot ameliorate harms in offshore detention. J Med Ethics 2022:medethics-2022-108348. [PMID: 36347606 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Professional providers of mental health services are motivated to help people, including, or especially, vulnerable people. We analyse the ethical implications of mental health providers accepting employment at detention centres that operate out of the normal regulatory structure of the modern state. Specifically, we examine tensions and moral harms experienced by providers at the Australian immigration detention centre on the island of Nauru. Australia has adopted indefinite offshore detention for asylum-seekers arriving by boat as part of a deterrence strategy that relies on making detainment conditions harsh. This has known deleterious mental health effects. As a token to fiduciary care obligations, Australia employs mental health professionals to work on Nauru. These providers are often motivated to make a positive difference for detainees' lives. We examine the overall impact of the providers' work with detainees and the implications of their presence. The strongest evidence supports that the small mitigation of harms offered by these providers does not outweigh the harms of supporting a system designed to perpetuate human suffering. For mental health professionals considering working in offshore detention, we offer specific topics to scrutinise and weigh prior to employment. Because optimising detainee's mental health is beyond the capacity of individual providers, we call for the organisations standardising and supporting mental health professionals to oppose employment of their associates in offshore detention. Lessons from this case study are generalisable to other jurisdictions to help inform organisations that licence and support mental health providers and individual providers considering work in similar settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elisif Winters
- Non-Academic Staff, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
If a person is competent to consent to a treatment, is that person necessarily competent to refuse the very same treatment? Risk relativists answer no to this question. If the refusal of a treatment is risky, we may demand a higher level of decision-making capacity to choose this option. The position is known as asymmetry. Risk relativity rests on the possibility of setting variable levels of competence by reference to variable levels of risk. In an excellent 2016 article in Journal of Medical Ethics (JME), Rob Lawlor defends asymmetry of this kind by defending risk relativity, using and developing arguments and approaches found in earlier work such as that of Wilks. He offers what we call the two-scale approach: a scale of risk is to be used to set a standard of competence on a scale of decision-making difficulty. However, can this be done in any rational way? We argue it cannot, and in this sense, and to this extent, risk relativity is a nonsense.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giles Newton-Howes
- Psychological Medicine, University of Otago Medical School, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Simon Walker
- Bioethics Centre, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Braun
- Department of Systematic Theology II (Ethics), FAU, Erlangen 91054, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Romanis EC. Appropriately framing maternal request caesarean section. J Med Ethics 2022; 48:554-556. [PMID: 34992084 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
In their paper, 'How to reach trustworthy decisions for caesarean sections on maternal request: a call for beneficial power', Eide and Bærøe present maternal request caesarean sections (MRCS) as a site of conflict in obstetrics because birthing people are seeking access to a treatment 'without any anticipated medical benefit'. While I agree with the conclusions of their paper -that there is a need to reform the approach to MRCS counselling to ensure that the structural vulnerability of pregnant people making birth decisions is addressed-I disagree with the framing of MRCS as having 'no anticipated medical benefit'. I argue that MRCS is often inappropriately presented as unduly risky,without supporting empirical evidence,and that MRCS is most often sought by birthing people on the basis of a clinical need. I argue that there needs to be open conversation and frank willingness to acknowledge the values that are currently underpinning the presentation of MRCS as 'clinically unnecessary'; specifically there needs to be more discussion of where and why the benefits of MRCS that are recognised by individual birthing people are not recognised by clinicians. This is important to ensure access to MRCS for birthing people that need it.
Collapse
|
49
|
Daly D. Principlist approach to multiple heart valve replacements for patients with intravenous drug use-induced endocarditis. J Med Ethics 2022; 48:medethics-2021-107685. [PMID: 35732422 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Medical professionals often deny patients who inject opioids a second or third heart valve replacement, even if such a surgery is medically indicated. However, such a position is not well defended. As this paper demonstrates, the ethical literature on the topic too often fails to develop and apply an ethical lens to analyse the issue of multiple valve replacements. This paper addresses this lacuna by analysing the case of Mr Walsh, a composite case which protects the identity of any one patient, through the principlist approach of Beauchamp and Childress. It argues that the hospital should offer Mr Walsh, a second valve replacement because the procedure is: medically indicated, autonomously requested, non-maleficent, beneficent and does not violate a formal account of justice. The paper concludes with clinical ethical guidelines for valve surgery for patients with opioid use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Daly
- School of Theology and Ministry, Boston College, Brighton, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jongsma KR, Sand M. Agree to disagree: the symmetry of burden of proof in human-AI collaboration. J Med Ethics 2022; 48:230-231. [PMID: 35321904 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2022-108242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Sand
- Department of Values, Technology and Innovation, TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|