1
|
Anderson SM, Seto E, Chau D, Lee B, Vail A, Ding S, Voloshin A, Nagel M. Fiber chromatographic enabled process intensification increases monoclonal antibody product yield. Biotechnol Bioeng 2024; 121:757-770. [PMID: 37902763 DOI: 10.1002/bit.28584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
The most straightforward method to increase monoclonal antibody (mAb) product yield is to complete the purification process in less steps. Here, three different fiber chromatographic devices were implemented using a holistic approach to intensify the mAb purification process and increase yield. Fiber protein A (proA) chromatography was first investigated, but traditional depth filtration was not sufficient in reducing the contaminant load as the fiber proA device prematurely fouled. Further experimentation revealed that chromatin aggregates were the most likely reason for the fiber fouling. To reduce levels of chromatin aggregates, a chromatographic clarification device (CCD) was incorporated into the process, resulting in single-stage clarification of harvested cell culture fluid and reduction of DNA levels. The CCD clarified pool was then successfully processed through the fiber proA device, fully realizing the productivity gains that the fiber technology offers. After the proA and viral inactivation neutralization (VIN) hold step, the purification process was further intensified using a novel single-use fiber-based polishing anion exchange (AEX) material that is capable of binding both soluble and insoluble contaminants. The three-stage fiber chromatographic purification process was compared to a legacy five-step process of dual-stage depth filtration, bead-based proA chromatography, post-VIN depth filtration, and bead-based AEX chromatography. The overall yield from the five-step process was 60%, while the fiber chromatographic-enabled intensified process had an overall yield of 70%. The impurity clearance of DNA and host cell protein (HCP) for both processes were within the regulatory specification (<100 ppm HCP, <1 ppb DNA). For the harvest of a 2000 L cell culture, the intensified process is expected to increase productivity by 2.5-fold at clarification, 50-fold at the proA step, and 1.6-fold in polishing. Relative to the legacy process, the intensified process would reduce buffer use by 1088 L and decrease overall process product mass intensity by 12.6%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean M Anderson
- 3M, Separation and Purification Sciences, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elbert Seto
- Gilead, Protein Sciences, Foster City, California, USA
| | - David Chau
- 3M, Separation and Purification Sciences, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Brian Lee
- Gilead, Protein Sciences, Foster City, California, USA
| | - Andrew Vail
- 3M, Separation and Purification Sciences, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sheng Ding
- Gilead, Protein Sciences, Foster City, California, USA
| | - Alexei Voloshin
- 3M, Separation and Purification Sciences, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark Nagel
- Gilead, Protein Sciences, Foster City, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Mara B, Singh NK, Menendez A, Tipton B, Vail A, Voloshin A, Buechler Y, Anderson SM. Single-stage chromatographic clarification of Chinese Hamster Ovary cell harvest reduces cost of protein production. Biotechnol Prog 2023; 39:e3323. [PMID: 36598038 DOI: 10.1002/btpr.3323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
A single-stage clarification was developed using a single-use chromatographic clarification device (CCD) to recover a recombinant protein from Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) harvest cell culture fluid (HCCF). Clarification of a CHO HCCF is a complex and costly process, involving multiple stages of centrifugation and/or depth filtration to remove cells and debris and to reduce process-related impurities such as host cell protein (HCP), nucleic acids, and lipids. When using depth filtration, the filter train consists of multiple filters of varying ratios, layers, pore sizes, and adsorptive properties. The depth filters, in combination with a 0.2-micron membrane filter, clarify the HCCF based on size-exclusion, adsorptive, and charge-based mechanisms, and provide robust bioburden control. Each stage of the clarification process requires time, labor, and utilities, with product loss at each step. Here, use of the 3M™ Harvest RC Chromatographic Clarifier, a single-stage CCD, is identified as an alternative strategy to a three-stage filtration train. The CCD results in less overall filter area, less volume for flushing, and higher yield. Using bioprocess cost modeling, the single-stage clarification process was compared to a three-stage filtration process. By compressing the CHO HCCF clarification to a single chromatographic stage, the overall cost of the clarification process was reduced by 17%-30%, depending on bioreactor scale. The main drivers for the cost reduction were reduced total filtration area, labor, time, and utilities. The benefits of the single-stage harvest process extended throughout the downstream process, resulting in a 25% relative increase in cumulative yield with comparable impurity clearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian O'Mara
- Process Development, Ambrx, Inc., La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | | | - Barbara Tipton
- Process Development, Ambrx, Inc., La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Andrew Vail
- Separation and Purification Sciences, 3M, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Alexei Voloshin
- Separation and Purification Sciences, 3M, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ying Buechler
- Process Development, Ambrx, Inc., La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Sean M Anderson
- Separation and Purification Sciences, 3M, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|