Whole-exome sequencing and host cell reactivation assay lead to a diagnosis of xeroderma pigmentosum group D with mild ultraviolet radiation sensitivity

A case of xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) group D in a 39-year-old Japanese man is reported. The patient had suffered from moderate to severe solar sensitivity and freckle-like pigmented macules in sun-exposed areas since 6 years of age, and developed skin malignancies such as squamous cell carcinoma, actinic keratosis, Bowen's disease and basal cell carcinoma. The minimal erythema dose for ultraviolet (UV) radiation was decreased with a delayed peak reaction. The level of unscheduled DNA synthesis of fibroblasts from the patient was 70% of normal, while they expressed POLH, a gene product responsible for the XP variant. Whole-exome sequencing indicated that the patient harbored a homozygous mutation of c.1802G>T, p.Arg601Leu in ERCC2. A genetic complementation test was carried out by host cell reactivation assay, which showed that the patient's fibroblasts recovered only when they were transfected with XPD cDNA, confirming the diagnosis of XP-D. Arg601Leu mutation in ERCC2 may be related to mild UV radiation sensitivity and moderate skin lesions.

Poly(ADP-ribose)-mediated interplay of XPA and PARP1 leads to reciprocal regulation of protein function

Poly(ADP‐ribose) (PAR) is a complex and reversible post‐translational modification that controls protein function and localization through covalent modification of, or noncovalent binding to target proteins. Previously, we and others characterized the noncovalent, high‐affinity binding of the key nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein XPA to PAR. In the present study, we address the functional relevance of this interaction. First, we confirm that pharmacological inhibition of cellular poly(ADP‐ribosyl)ation (PARylation) impairs NER efficacy. Second, we demonstrate that the XPA–PAR interaction is mediated by specific basic amino acids within a highly conserved PAR‐binding motif, which overlaps the DNA damage‐binding protein 2 (DDB2) and transcription factor II H (TFIIH) interaction domains of XPA. Third, biochemical studies reveal a mutual regulation of PARP1 and XPA functions showing that, on the one hand, the XPA–PAR interaction lowers the DNA binding affinity of XPA, whereas, on the other hand, XPA itself strongly stimulates PARP1 enzymatic activity. Fourth, microirradiation experiments in U2OS cells demonstrate that PARP inhibition alters the recruitment properties of XPA‐green fluorescent protein to sites of laser‐induced DNA damage. In conclusion, our results reveal that XPA and PARP1 regulate each other in a reciprocal and PAR‐dependent manner, potentially acting as a fine‐tuning mechanism for the spatio‐temporal regulation of the two factors during NER.