1
|
Cohen Rodrigues TR, Reijnders T, Breeman LD, Janssen VR, Kraaijenhagen RA, Atsma DE, Evers AW. Use Intention and User Expectations of Human-Supported and Self-Help eHealth Interventions: Internet-Based Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e38803. [PMID: 38358784 PMCID: PMC10905349 DOI: 10.2196/38803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-help eHealth interventions provide automated support to change health behaviors without any further human assistance. The main advantage of self-help eHealth interventions is that they have the potential to lower the workload of health care professionals. However, one disadvantage is that they generally have a lower uptake. Possibly, the absence of a relationship with a health care professional (referred to as the working alliance) could lead to negative expectations that hinder the uptake of self-help interventions. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) identifies which expectations predict use intention. As there has been no previous research exploring how expectations affect the adoption of both self-help and human-supported eHealth interventions, this study is the first to investigate the impact of expectations on the uptake of both kinds of eHealth interventions. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the intention to use a self-help eHealth intervention compared to a human-supported eHealth intervention and the expectations that moderate this relationship. METHODS A total of 146 participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 conditions (human-supported or self-help eHealth interventions). Participants evaluated screenshots of a human-supported or self-help app-based stress intervention. We measured intention to use the intervention-expected working alliance and the UTAUT constructs: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence. RESULTS Use intention did not differ significantly between the 2 conditions (t142=-1.133; P=.26). Performance expectancy (F1,140=69.269; P<.001), effort expectancy (F1,140=3.961; P=.049), social influence (F1,140=90.025; P<.001), and expected working alliance (F1,140=26.435; P<.001) were positively related to use intention regardless of condition. The interaction analysis showed that performance expectancy (F1,140=4.363; P=.04) and effort expectancy (F1,140=4.102; P=.045) more strongly influenced use intention in the self-help condition compared to the human-supported condition. CONCLUSIONS As we found no difference in use intention, our results suggest that we could expect an equal uptake of self-help eHealth interventions and human-supported ones. However, attention should be paid to people who have doubts about the intervention's helpfulness or ease of use. For those people, providing additional human support would be beneficial to ensure uptake. Screening user expectations could help health care professionals optimize self-help eHealth intervention uptake in practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION OSF Registries osf.io/n47cz; https://osf.io/n47cz.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Reijnders
- Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Linda D Breeman
- Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Veronica R Janssen
- Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Roderik A Kraaijenhagen
- NDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostics (NIPED), Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Vital10, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Douwe E Atsma
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Andrea Wm Evers
- Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Leiden University, Technical University of Delft, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Leiden, Delft, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cohen Rodrigues TR, Breeman LD, Kinik A, Reijnders T, Dusseldorp E, Janssen VR, Kraaijenhagen RA, Atsma DE, Evers AW. Effectiveness of Human-Supported and Self-Help eHealth Lifestyle Interventions for Patients With Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Meta-Analysis. Psychosom Med 2023; 85:795-804. [PMID: 37549197 PMCID: PMC10662612 DOI: 10.1097/psy.0000000000001242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE eHealth is a useful tool to deliver lifestyle interventions for patients with cardiometabolic diseases. However, there are inconsistent findings about whether these eHealth interventions should be supported by a human professional, or whether self-help interventions are equally effective. METHODS Databases were searched between January 1995 and October 2021 for randomized controlled trials on cardiometabolic diseases (cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus) and eHealth lifestyle interventions. A multilevel meta-analysis was used to pool clinical and behavioral health outcomes. Moderator analyses assessed the effect of intervention type (self-help versus human-supported), dose of human support (minor versus major part of intervention), and delivery mode of human support (remote versus blended). One hundred seven articles fulfilled eligibility criteria and 102 unique ( N = 20,781) studies were included. RESULTS The analysis showed a positive effect of eHealth lifestyle interventions on clinical and behavioral health outcomes ( p < .001). However, these effects were not moderated by intervention type ( p = .169), dose ( p = .698), or delivery mode of human support ( p = .557). CONCLUSIONS This shows that self-help eHealth interventions are equally effective as human-supported ones in improving health outcomes among patients with cardiometabolic disease. Future studies could investigate whether higher-quality eHealth interventions compensate for a lack of human support.Meta-analysis registration: PROSPERO CRD42021269263 .
Collapse
|
3
|
Eustis EH, LoPresti J, Aguilera A, Schueller SM. Cultural Responsivity in Technology-Enabled Services: Integrating Culture Into Technology and Service Components. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e45409. [PMID: 37788050 PMCID: PMC10582817 DOI: 10.2196/45409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Technology-enabled services (TESs) are clinical interventions that combine technological and human components to provide health services. TESs for mental health are efficacious in the treatment of anxiety and depression and are currently being offered as frontline treatments around the world. It is hoped that these interventions will be able to reach diverse populations across a range of identities and ultimately decrease disparities in mental health treatment. However, this hope is largely unrealized. TESs include both technology and human service components, and we argue that cultural responsivity must be considered in each of these components to help address existing treatment disparities. To date, there is limited guidance on how to consider cultural responsivity within these interventions, including specific targets for the development, tailoring, or design of the technologies and services within TESs. In response, we propose a framework that provides specific recommendations for targets based on existing models, both at the technological component level (informed by the Behavioral Intervention Technology Model) and the human support level (informed by the Efficiency Model of Support). We hope that integrating culturally responsive considerations into these existing models will facilitate increased attention to cultural responsivity within TESs to ensure they are ethical and responsive for everyone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth H Eustis
- Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jessica LoPresti
- Department of Psychology, Suffolk University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Adrian Aguilera
- School of Social Welfare, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Stephen M Schueller
- Department of Psychological Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eysenbach G, Amado S, Jasman M, Ervin A, Rhodes JE. Providing Human Support for the Use of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Meta-review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e42864. [PMID: 36745497 PMCID: PMC9941905 DOI: 10.2196/42864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have been increasingly deployed to bridge gaps in mental health care, particularly given their promising efficacy. Nevertheless, attrition among DMHI users remains high. In response, human support has been studied as a means of improving retention to and outcomes of DMHIs. Although a growing number of studies and meta-analyses have investigated the effects of human support for DMHIs on mental health outcomes, systematic empirical evidence of its effectiveness across mental health domains remains scant. OBJECTIVE We aimed to summarize the results of meta-analyses of human support versus no support for DMHI use across various outcome domains, participant samples, and support providers. METHODS We conducted a systematic meta-review of meta-analyses, comparing the effects of human support with those of no support for DMHI use, with the goal of qualitatively summarizing data across various outcome domains, participant samples, and support providers. We used MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsycINFO electronic databases. Articles were included if the study had a quantitative meta-analysis study design; the intervention targeted mental health symptoms and was delivered via a technology platform (excluding person-delivered interventions mediated through telehealth, text messages, or social media); the outcome variables included mental health symptoms such as anxiety, depression, stress, posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, or a number of these symptoms together; and the study included quantitative comparisons of outcomes in which human support versus those when no or minimal human support was provided. RESULTS The results of 31 meta-analyses (505 unique primary studies) were analyzed. The meta-analyses reported 45 effect sizes; almost half (n=22, 48%) of them showed that human-supported DMHIs were significantly more effective than unsupported DMHIs. A total of 9% (4/45) of effect sizes showed that unsupported DMHIs were significantly more effective. No clear patterns of results emerged regarding the efficacy of human support for the outcomes assessed (including anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, stress, and multiple outcomes). Human-supported DMHIs may be more effective than unsupported DMHIs for individuals with elevated mental health symptoms. There were no clear results regarding the type of training for those providing support. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the potential of human support in improving the effects of DMHIs. Specifically, evidence emerged for stronger effects of human support for individuals with greater symptom severity. There was considerable heterogeneity across meta-analyses in the level of detail regarding the nature of the interventions, population served, and support delivered, making it difficult to draw strong conclusions regarding the circumstances under which human support is most effective. Future research should emphasize reporting detailed descriptions of sample and intervention characteristics and describe the mechanism through which they believe the coach will be most useful for the DMHI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Selen Amado
- Center for Evidence-Based Mentoring, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Megyn Jasman
- Center for Evidence-Based Mentoring, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ariel Ervin
- Center for Evidence-Based Mentoring, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jean E Rhodes
- Center for Evidence-Based Mentoring, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mavragani A, Eikey EV, De Leon C, Schueller SM, Schneider M, Stadnick NA, Zheng K, Wilson L, Caro D, Mukamel DB, Sorkin DH. Understanding the Role of Support in Digital Mental Health Programs With Older Adults: Users' Perspective and Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e43192. [PMID: 36512387 PMCID: PMC9795392 DOI: 10.2196/43192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital mental health interventions have the potential to increase mental health support among isolated older adults. However, the older adult population can experience several barriers to accessing and using digital health resources and may need extra support to experience its benefits. OBJECTIVE This paper aimed to understand what older adults experience as an important aspect of support during engagement in a digital mental health program. The program entailed 3 months of staff support to participate in digital literacy training and engage with the digital mental health platform myStrength, which offers support for a range of mental health challenges, including depression and anxiety. METHODS A total of 30 older adults participated in surveys and interviews to assess their experience of participating in a digital mental health program provided by county mental health services. As part of the program, participants attended 4 classes of digital literacy training, had access to the digital mental health platform myStrength for 2 months with staff support (and 10 months after the program without support), and received support from program staff during the entire 3-month program. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS A thematic analysis of the interview data revealed that participants valued ongoing support in 3 main areas: technical support to assist them in using technology, guided support to remind them to use myStrength and practice skills they had learned, and social support to enable them to connect with others through the program. Furthermore, participants reported that social connections was the most important aspect of the program and that they were mainly motivated to participate in the program because it was recommended to them by trusted others such as a community partner or because they believed it could potentially help others. CONCLUSIONS Our findings can be used to inform the design of future digital mental health programs for older adults who may have unique support needs in terms of dedicated technical support and ongoing guided support to use technology and social support to increase social connectedness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth V Eikey
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.,The Design Lab, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Cinthia De Leon
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Stephen M Schueller
- Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.,Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Margaret Schneider
- Department of Public Health, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Nicole A Stadnick
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.,Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.,Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Kai Zheng
- Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Lorraine Wilson
- Department of Health and Human Services, County of Marin, San Rafael, CA, United States
| | - Damaris Caro
- Department of Health and Human Services, County of Marin, San Rafael, CA, United States
| | - Dana B Mukamel
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Dara H Sorkin
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ramadurai R, Beckham E, McHugh RK, Björgvinsson T, Beard C. Operationalizing Engagement With an Interpretation Bias Smartphone App Intervention: Case Series. JMIR Ment Health 2022; 9:e33545. [PMID: 35976196 PMCID: PMC9434389 DOI: 10.2196/33545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Engagement with mental health smartphone apps is an understudied but critical construct to understand in the pursuit of improved efficacy. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine engagement as a multidimensional construct for a novel app called HabitWorks. HabitWorks delivers a personalized interpretation bias intervention and includes various strategies to enhance engagement such as human support, personalization, and self-monitoring. METHODS We examined app use in a pilot study (n=31) and identified 5 patterns of behavioral engagement: consistently low, drop-off, adherent, high diary, and superuser. RESULTS We present a series of cases (5/31, 16%) from this trial to illustrate the patterns of behavioral engagement and cognitive and affective engagement for each case. With rich participant-level data, we emphasize the diverse engagement patterns and the necessity of studying engagement as a heterogeneous and multifaceted construct. CONCLUSIONS Our thorough idiographic exploration of engagement with HabitWorks provides an example of how to operationalize engagement for other mental health apps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramya Ramadurai
- Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Erin Beckham
- Cognition and Affect Research and Education Lab, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - R Kathryn McHugh
- Division of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - Thröstur Björgvinsson
- Behavioral Health Partial Hospital Program, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - Courtney Beard
- Cognition and Affect Research and Education Lab, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Renfrew ME, Morton DP, Morton JK, Przybylko G. The Influence of Human Support on the Effectiveness of Digital Mental Health Promotion Interventions for the General Population. Front Psychol 2021; 12:716106. [PMID: 34489818 PMCID: PMC8416605 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Mental wellbeing amongst the general population is languishing—exacerbated by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Digital mental health promotion interventions, that improve mental health literacy and encourage adoption of evidence-informed practical strategies are essential. However, attrition and non-adherence are problematic in digital interventions. Human support is often applied as an antidote; yet, there is a paucity of randomized trials that compare different human support conditions amongst general population cohorts. Limited trials generally indicate that human support has little influence on adherence or outcomes in DMHPIs. However, providing participants autonomy to self-select automated support options may enhance motivation and adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Elise Renfrew
- Lifestyle Medicine and Health Research Center, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia
| | - Darren Peter Morton
- Lifestyle Medicine and Health Research Center, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia
| | - Jason Kyle Morton
- Lifestyle Medicine and Health Research Center, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia
| | - Geraldine Przybylko
- Lifestyle Medicine and Health Research Center, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dopke CA, McBride A, Babington P, Jonathan GK, Michaels T, Ryan C, Duffecy J, Mohr DC, Goulding EH. Development of Coaching Support for LiveWell: A Smartphone-Based Self-Management Intervention for Bipolar Disorder. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e25810. [PMID: 33759798 PMCID: PMC8075075 DOI: 10.2196/25810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite effective pharmacological treatment, bipolar disorder is a leading cause of disability due to recurrence of episodes, long episode durations, and persistence of interepisode symptoms. While adding psychotherapy to pharmacotherapy improves outcomes, the availability of adjunctive psychotherapy is limited. To extend the accessibility and functionality of psychotherapy for bipolar disorder, we developed LiveWell, a smartphone-based self-management intervention. Unfortunately, many mental health technology interventions suffer from high attrition rates, with users rapidly failing to maintain engagement with the intervention technology. Human support reduces this commonly observed engagement problem but does not consistently improve clinical and recovery outcomes. To facilitate ongoing efforts to develop human support for digital mental health technologies, this paper describes the design decisions, theoretical framework, content, mode, timing of delivery, and the training and supervision for coaching support of the LiveWell technology. This support includes clearly defined and structured roles that aim to encourage the use of the technology, self-management strategies, and communication with care providers. A clear division of labor is established between the coaching support roles and the intervention technology to allow lay personnel to serve as coaches and thereby maximize accessibility to the LiveWell intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia A Dopke
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Alyssa McBride
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Pamela Babington
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Geneva K Jonathan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Tania Michaels
- General Pediatrics, Loma Linda Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, CA, United States
| | - Chloe Ryan
- Department of Social Work, UPMC Western Psychiatric Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Jennifer Duffecy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - David C Mohr
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Evan H Goulding
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Enrique Roig A, Mooney O, Salamanca-Sanabria A, Lee CT, Farrell S, Richards D. Assessing the Efficacy and Acceptability of a Web-Based Intervention for Resilience Among College Students: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res 2020; 4:e20167. [PMID: 33174530 PMCID: PMC7688384 DOI: 10.2196/20167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND College students are at elevated risk for developing mental health problems and face specific barriers around accessing evidence-based treatment. Web-based interventions that focus on mental health promotion and strengthening resilience represent one possible solution. Providing support to users has shown to reduce dropout in these interventions. Further research is needed to assess the efficacy and acceptability of these interventions and explore the viability of automating support. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the feasibility of a new web-based resilience program based on positive psychology, provided with human or automated support, in a sample of college students. METHODS A 3-armed closed pilot randomized controlled trial design was used. Participants were randomized to the intervention with human support (n=29), intervention with automated support (n=26), or waiting list (n=28) group. Primary outcomes were resilience and well-being, respectively measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and Pemberton Happiness Index. Secondary outcomes included measures of depression and anxiety, self-esteem, and stress. Outcomes were self-assessed through online questionnaires. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were conducted. RESULTS All participants demonstrated significant improvements in resilience and related outcomes, including an unexpected improvement in the waiting list group. Within- and between-group effect sizes ranged from small to moderate and within-group effects were typically larger for the human than automated support group. A total of 36 participants began the program and completed 46.46% of it on average. Participants were generally satisfied with the program and found it easy to use. CONCLUSIONS Findings support the feasibility of the intervention. Preliminary evidence for the equal benefit of human and automated support needs to be supported by further research with a larger sample. Results of this study will inform the development of a full-scale trial, from which stronger conclusions may be drawn. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 11866034; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11866034. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.1016/j.invent.2019.100254.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Enrique Roig
- E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Olwyn Mooney
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Alicia Salamanca-Sanabria
- E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Future Health Technologies Programme, Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise, Singapore-ETH Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chi Tak Lee
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Simon Farrell
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Derek Richards
- E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Renfrew ME, Morton DP, Morton JK, Hinze JS, Przybylko G, Craig BA. The Influence of Three Modes of Human Support on Attrition and Adherence to a Web- and Mobile App-Based Mental Health Promotion Intervention in a Nonclinical Cohort: Randomized Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19945. [PMID: 32990633 PMCID: PMC7556377 DOI: 10.2196/19945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The escalating prevalence of mental health disorders necessitates a greater focus on web- and mobile app–based mental health promotion initiatives for nonclinical groups. However, knowledge is scant regarding the influence of human support on attrition and adherence and participant preferences for support in nonclinical settings. Objective This study aimed to compare the influence of 3 modes of human support on attrition and adherence to a digital mental health intervention for a nonclinical cohort. It evaluated user preferences for support and assessed whether adherence and outcomes were enhanced when participants received their preferred support mode. Methods Subjects participated in a 10-week digital mental health promotion intervention and were randomized into 3 comparative groups: standard group with automated emails (S), standard plus personalized SMS (S+pSMS), and standard plus weekly videoconferencing support (S+VCS). Adherence was measured by the number of video lessons viewed, points achieved for weekly experiential challenge activities, and the total number of weeks that participants recorded a score for challenges. In the postquestionnaire, participants ranked their preferred human support mode from 1 to 4 (S, S+pSMS, S+VCS, S+pSMS & VCS combined). Stratified analysis was conducted for those who received their first preference. Preintervention and postintervention questionnaires assessed well-being measures (ie, mental health, vitality, depression, anxiety, stress, life satisfaction, and flourishing). Results Interested individuals (N=605) enrolled on a website and were randomized into 3 groups (S, n=201; S+pSMS, n=202; S+VCS, n=201). Prior to completing the prequestionnaire, a total of 24.3% (147/605) dropped out. Dropout attrition between groups was significantly different (P=.009): 21.9% (44/201) withdrew from the S group, 19.3% (39/202) from the S+pSMS
group, and 31.6% (64/202) from the S+VCS group. The remaining 75.7% (458/605) registered and completed the prequestionnaire (S, n=157; S+pSMS, n=163; S+VCS, n=138). Of the registered participants, 30.1% (138/458) failed to complete the postquestionnaire (S, n=54; S+pSMS, n=49; S+VCS, n=35), but there were no between-group differences (P=.24). For the 69.9% (320/458; S, n=103; S+pSMS, n=114; S+VCS, n=103) who completed the postquestionnaire, no between-group differences in adherence were observed for mean number of videos watched (P=.42); mean challenge scores recorded (P=.71); or the number of weeks that challenge scores were logged (P=.66). A total of 56 participants (17.5%, 56/320) received their first preference in human support (S, n=22; S+pSMS, n=26; S+VCS, n=8). No differences were observed between those who received their first preference and those who did not with regard to video adherence (P=.91); challenge score adherence (P=.27); or any of the well-being measures including, mental health (P=.86), vitality (P=.98), depression (P=.09), anxiety (P=.64), stress (P=.55), life satisfaction (P=.50), and flourishing (P=.47). Conclusions Early dropout attrition may have been influenced by dissatisfaction with the allocated support mode. Human support mode did not impact adherence to the intervention, and receiving the preferred support style did not result in greater adherence or better outcomes. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): 12619001009101; http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12619001009101.aspx
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Elise Renfrew
- Lifestyle and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, Australia
| | - Darren Peter Morton
- Lifestyle and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, Australia
| | - Jason Kyle Morton
- Lifestyle and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, Australia
| | - Jason Scott Hinze
- Lifestyle and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, Australia
| | - Geraldine Przybylko
- Lifestyle and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, Australia
| | - Bevan Adrian Craig
- Lifestyle and Health Research Centre, Avondale University College, Cooranbong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ryan K, Murphy LE, Linehan C, Dockray S. Theory in practice: identifying theory-based techniques in health coaches' tailored feedback during a weight loss intervention. Psychol Health 2020; 35:1384-1406. [PMID: 32362140 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1748629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective: A taxonomy of ninety-three functionally different behaviour change techniques (BCTs) has been identified. However, it is not fully clear how these and other theory-based techniques are applied in the day-to-day practice of people delivering health behaviour change interventions. This study examines feedback provided by expert health coaches in a behavioural weight-loss intervention, to describe; a) what theory-based techniques are used in sessions, b) which techniques are used most frequently, c) what occurs in sessions, beyond existing theory-based techniques. Main Outcome Measures: Theory-based techniques (BCTs/tailoring strategies); relational/content-based techniques. Design: 10 tailored feedback videos from two health coaches were coded using a hybrid thematic analysis approach. Theory-based techniques were coded deductively; content not matching definitions of theory-based techniques but that addressed a determinant of behaviour change were coded inductively and relational codes were connected into themes. Results: Seventeen BCTs were coded M = 20.88 times (range:1-109). Eight tailoring techniques were coded M = 25.25 times (range:1-91). Relational themes included; 'Autonomous interpersonal coaching style,' 'Supportive accountability,' and 'Coach as expert'. Additional behavioural techniques were also identified. Conclusion: This work highlights what and how theory-based techniques are implemented in a weight-loss intervention, drawing attention to the role of tailoring techniques and health coaches in supporting behaviour change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Ryan
- School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Lisa Ellen Murphy
- School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Conor Linehan
- School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Samantha Dockray
- School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ozaki I, Watai I, Nishijima M, Saito N. Randomized controlled trial of Web-based weight-loss intervention with human support for male workers under 40. J Occup Health 2019; 61:110-120. [PMID: 30698339 PMCID: PMC6499366 DOI: 10.1002/1348-9585.12037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Human support can boost weight reduction in Internet‐based weight‐loss intervention. However, the most effective way to combine human support and the Internet for weight loss is unclear. This study aimed to examine the effects of two weight‐loss programs for male workers aged 18‐39 that combined different intensities of human support with website support compared to a delayed‐intervention group (control group; CG), in a randomized controlled trial. Methods Seventy‐one participants with overweight or obesity were allocated to one of three 12‐week treatment programs. The Standard Support Group (SSG) was provided support via website and two face‐to‐face group guidance sessions, at the beginning and at the end of the program along with monthly general emails throughout the program. The Enhanced Support Group (ESG) received four remote support sessions based on Supportive Accountability (SA) in addition to the SSG. The CG was provided the same program as SSG after the other two groups had completed the program. The primary outcome was body weight reduction. Results ESG participants reduced their weight significantly more than SSG and CG participants (P = 0.038, P < 0.001, respectively), and SSG participants reduced their weight significantly more than CG participants (P = 0.033). Conclusions The additional remote human support provided to the participants in the ESG was beneficial for weight loss in male workers. The low‐intensity program provided to the SSG was also effective. Further studies with more participants in diverse settings and with participants who are less interested in their health and weight management are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Itsuko Ozaki
- School of Nursing, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Izumi Watai
- Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Mariko Nishijima
- Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University, Toon, Japan
| | - Nozomu Saito
- Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University, Toon, Japan
| |
Collapse
|