Improved concordance of challenging human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 dual in-situ hybridisation cases with the use of a digital image analysis algorithm in breast cancer

AIMS

Accurate assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression by HER2 immunohistochemistry and in-situ hybridisation (ISH) is critical for the management of patients with breast cancer. The revised 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines define 5 groups based on HER2 expression and copy number. Manual pathologist quantification by light microscopy of equivocal and less common HER2 ISH groups (groups 2-4) can be challenging, and there are no data on interobserver variability in reporting of these cases. We sought to determine whether a digital algorithm could improve interobserver variability in the assessment of difficult HER2 ISH cases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

HER2 ISH was evaluated in a cohort enriched for less common HER2 patterns using standard light microscopy versus analysis of whole slide images using the Roche uPath HER2 dual ISH image analysis algorithm. Standard microscopy demonstrated significant interobserver variability with a Fleiss's kappa value of 0.471 (fair-moderate agreement) improving to 0.666 (moderate-good) with the use of the algorithm. For HER2 group designation (groups 1-5), there was poor-moderate reliability between pathologists by microscopy [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.526], improving to moderate-good agreement (ICC = 0.763) with the use of the algorithm. In subgroup analysis, the algorithm improved concordance particularly in groups 2, 4 and 5. Time to enumerate cases was also significantly reduced.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrates the potential of a digital image analysis algorithm to improve the concordance of pathologist HER2 amplification status reporting in less common HER2 groups. This has the potential to improve therapy selection and outcomes for patients with HER2-low and borderline HER2-amplified breast cancers.

Performance of a HER2 testing algorithm specific for p53-abnormal endometrial cancer

Aims

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification in endometrial cancer (EC) is almost completely confined to the p53‐abnormal (p53abn) molecular subtype and independent of histological subtype. HER2 testing should therefore be molecular subtype‐directed. However, the most optimal approach for HER2 testing in EC has not been fully established. Therefore, we developed an EC‐specific HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring method and evaluated its reproducibility and performance to establish an optimal diagnostic HER2 testing algorithm for p53abn EC.

Methods and results

HER2 IHC slides of 78 p53abn EC were scored by six gynaecopathologists according to predefined EC‐specific IHC scoring criteria. Interobserver agreement was calculated using Fleiss’ kappa and the first‐order agreement coefficient (AC1). The consensus IHC score was compared with HER2 dual in‐situ hybridisation (DISH) results. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A substantial interobserver agreement was found using three‐ or two‐tiered scoring [κ = 0.675, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.633–0.717; AC1 = 0.723, 95% CI = 0.643–0.804 and κ = 0.771, 95% CI = 0.714–0.828; AC1 = 0.774, 95% CI = 0.684–0.865, respectively]. Sensitivity and specificity for the identification of HER2‐positive EC was 100 and 97%, respectively, using a HER2 testing algorithm that recommends DISH in all cases with moderate membranous staining in >10% of the tumour (IHC+). Performing DISH on all IHC‐2+ and ‐3+ cases yields a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

Conclusions

Our EC‐specific HER2 IHC scoring method is reproducible. A screening strategy based on IHC scoring on all cases with subsequent DISH testing on IHC‐2+/‐3+ cases has perfect test accuracy for identifying HER2‐positive EC.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) can establish productive infection in dysplastic oral mucosa, but HPV status is poorly predicted by histological features and p16 expression

AIMS

Previous studies have reported the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) in a subset of dysplastic oral epithelial lesions. Many cases show a histological spectrum of atypia similar to that seen in non-human papillomavirus (HPV) severe epithelial dysplasia, but some studies have suggested that HPV status can be inferred on the basis of histological features. We aimed to assess the utility of such histological features and p16 as surrogate markers of HPV infection in a retrospective cohort of 33 cases of severe epithelial dysplasia, with matched clinicopathological data and histological features.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Tissue sections were assessed for the expression of p16, minichromosome maintenance 2, HPV E4 and HPV L1 by the use of immunohistochemistry. HPV16/18 E6 and E7 expression was assessed by the use of RNA in-situ hybridisation (RNAScope). In the cohort, 18.2% of cases (6/33) were HR-HPV-positive, with no age/gender differences between the HPV-positive and HPV-negative groups. HPV E4 and HPV L1 were expressed in surface keratinocytes in four of six (66%) HPV-positive cases, indicative of productive HPV infection. Lack of p16 expression was predictive of HPV-negative status, but sensitivity and specificity varied according to the cut-off. Histologically, the presence of karyorrhectic nuclei and abnormal mitotic figures was higher in HPV-positive lesions (P < 0.05), but the predictive specificity and sensitivity were suboptimal (sensitivity, 0.75; specificity, 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates, for the first time, that a minority of severely dysplastic oral lesions harbour productive, biologically relevant HPV infection. Consideration should be given to the specific assessment of HPV status in severe epithelial dysplasia cases, as both p16 status and the presence of karyorrhectic cells are poor predictive markers of HPV status.

HER2 immunohistochemical scores provide prognostic information for patients with HER2-type invasive breast cancer

AIMS

Invasive breast cancer patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemical (IHC) scores of 3+ or 2+ with reflex in-situ hybridisation (ISH) positivity are suitable for anti-HER2 therapies. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the prognoses between IHC 3+ patients and IHC 2+/ISH+ patients are different.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the clinicopathological information of 886 consecutive cases of HER2-positive early breast cancer. The influences of the patients' age, cancer stage, hormone receptor status and anti-HER2 treatment were adjusted using a multivariate Cox regression model. Both HER2 copy numbers and HER2 ISH ratios of the IHC 3+ group were significantly higher than those of the IHC 2+/ISH+ group. The outcomes of IHC 3+ patients were significantly better than those of IHC 2+/ISH+ patients in the univariate and multivariate analyses. HER2 copy numbers of ≥8 represented the best prognostic value, and it was chosen to be the cut-off value. The reflex ISH for IHC 2+ patients with high HER2 copy numbers (≥8) predicted a better overall survival than that for those with low HER2 copy numbers.

CONCLUSION

HER2 IHC scores and HER2 copy numbers can provide prognostic information for patients with HER2-positive invasive breast cancer. Both IHC 3+ and IHC 2+ patients with high HER2 copy numbers had a better prognosis.

HER2 testing of gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a commentary and guidance document from the Association of Clinical Pathologists Molecular Pathology and Diagnostics Committee

The use of biologics targeted to the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein is the latest addition to the armamentarium used to fight advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. The decision to treat with the biologic trastuzumab is completely dependent on HER2 testing of tumour tissue. In 2017, the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology jointly published guidelines for HER2 testing and clinical decision making in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The Association of Clinical Pathologists Molecular Pathology and Diagnostics Committee has issued the following document as a commentary of these guidelines and, in parallel, to provide guidance on HER2 testing in National Health Service pathology departments within the UK. This guidance covers issues related to case selection, preanalytical aspects, analysis and interpretation of such HER2 testing.