Computational Insights into the Binding Mechanism of OxyS sRNA with Chaperone Protein Hfq

Under the oxidative stress condition, the small RNA (sRNA) OxyS that acts as essential post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression is produced and plays a regulatory function with the assistance of the RNA chaperone Hfq protein. Interestingly, experimental studies found that the N48A mutation of Hfq protein could enhance the binding affinity with OxyS while resulting in the defection of gene regulation. However, how the Hfq protein interacts with sRNA OxyS and the origin of the stronger affinity of N48A mutation are both unclear. In this paper, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed on the complex structure of Hfq and OxyS to explore their binding mechanism. The molecular mechanics generalized born surface area (MM/GBSA) and interaction entropy (IE) method were combined to calculate the binding free energy between Hfq and OxyS sRNA, and the computational result was correlated with the experimental result. Per-residue decomposition of the binding free energy revealed that the enhanced binding ability of the N48A mutation mainly came from the increased van der Waals interactions (vdW). This research explored the binding mechanism between Oxys and chaperone protein Hfq and revealed the origin of the strong binding affinity of N48A mutation. The results provided important insights into the mechanism of gene expression regulation affected by protein mutations.

Computational Analysis of Residue-Specific Binding Free Energies of Androgen Receptor to Ligands

Androgen receptor (AR) is an important therapeutic target for the treatment of diseases such as prostate cancer, hypogonadism, muscle wasting, etc. In this study, the complex structures of the AR ligand-binding domain (LBD) with fifteen ligands were analyzed by molecular dynamics simulations combined with the alanine-scanning-interaction-entropy method (ASIE). The quantitative free energy contributions of the pocket residues were obtained and hotspot residues are quantitatively identified. Our calculation shows that that these hotspot residues are predominantly hydrophobic and their interactions with binding ligands are mainly van der Waals interactions. The total binding free energies obtained by summing over binding contributions by individual residues are in good correlation with the experimental binding data. The current quantitative analysis of binding mechanism of AR to ligands provides important insight on the design of future inhibitors.

Molecular Mechanism of Selective Binding of NMS-P118 to PARP-1 and PARP-2: A Computational Perspective

The nuclear protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) inhibitors have been proven effective to potentiate both chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy. However, a major problem of most current PARP inhibitors is their lack of selectivity for PARP-1 and its closest isoform PARP-2. NMS-P118 is a highly selective PARP inhibitor that binds PARP-1 stronger than PARP-2 and has many advantages such as excellent pharmacokinetic profiles. In this study, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of NMS-P118 in complex with PARP-1 and PARP-2 were performed to understand the molecular mechanism of its selectivity. Alanine scanning together with free energy calculation using MM/GBSA and interaction entropy reveal key residues that are responsible for the selectivity. Although the conformation of the binding pockets and NMS-P118 are very similar in PARP-1 and PARP-2, most of the hot-spot residues in PARP-1 have stronger binding free energy than the corresponding residues in PARP-2. Detailed analysis of the binding energy shows that the 4′4-difluorocyclohexyl ring on NMS-P118 form favorable hydrophobic interaction with Y889 in PARP-1. In addition, the H862 residue in PARP-1 has stronger binding free energy than H428 in PARP-2, which is due to shorter distance and stronger hydrogen bonds. Moreover, the negatively charged E763 residue in PARP-1 forms stronger electrostatic interaction energy with the positively charged NMS-P118 than the Q332 residue in PARP-2. These results rationalize the selectivity of NMS-P118 and may be useful for designing novel selective PARP inhibitors.

Molecular basis of SMAC-XIAP binding and the effect of electrostatic polarization

X-chromosome-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) inhibits cell apoptosis. Overexpression of XIAP is widely found in human cancers. Second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (SMAC) protein inhibits XIAP through binding with Baculovirus Inhibitor of apoptosis protein Repeat (BIR) 3 or BIR2 domain of XIAP. In this study, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and the alanine scanning calculations by MM-GBSA_IE method were used to investigate the protein-peptide interaction between BIR3 and BIR2 domains of XIAP and SMAC peptide. Energetic contribution of each binding residue is calculated and hotspots on both XIAP and SMAC were identified using computational alanine scanning with interaction entropy method. We found that electrostatic polarization is important in stabilizing the protein-protein complex structure in MD simulation. By using polarized protein-specific charges, much better agreement with experimental result is obtained for calculated binding free energies compared to those using standard (nonpolarizable) AMBER force field. In particular, excellent correlation between calculated binding free energies in alanine scanning with mutational experimental data was obtained for BIR3/SMAC binding.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Binding Modes of Small-Molecule Inhibitors to the EED Pocket of PRC2

Polycomb Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) plays a key role in silencing epigenetic gene through trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27). Dysregulations of PRC2 caused by overexpression and mutations of the core subunits of PRC2 have been implicated in many cancers. The core subunits EZH1/2 are histone-lysine N-methyltransferases that function as the enzymatic component of PRC2. While the core subunit EED is a scaffolding protein to support EZH1/2 and binds JARID2K116me3/H3K27me3 to enhance the enzymatic activity of PRC2 through allosteric activation. Recently, several small molecules that compete with JARI2K116me3 and H3K27me3 have been reported. These molecules selectively bind to the JARID2K116me3/H3K27me3-binding pocket of EED, thereby preventing the allosteric regulation of PRC2. These first-in-class PRC2 inhibitors show robust suppression in DLBCL cell lines, demonstrating anticancer drugs that target the EED subunit of PRC2 are viable. In this study, we used the recently developed MM/GBSA_IE and the alanine scanning method to analyze the hot spots in EED/inhibitor interactions. The analysis of these hot and warm spots helps us to understand the fundamental differences between inhibitors. Our results give a quantitative explanation on why the binding affinities of EED/A-395 interactions are stronger than that of EED/EED226 while their binding modes are similar and provide valuable insights for rational design of novel EED inhibitors.

Insight Into the Binding Mechanism of p53/pDIQ-MDMX/MDM2 With the Interaction Entropy Method

The study of the p53-MDMX/MDM2 binding sites is a research hotspot for tumor drug design. The inhibition of p53-targeted MDMX/MDM2 has become an effective approach in anti-tumor drug development. In this paper, a theoretically rigorous and computationally accurate method, namely, the interaction entropy (IE) method, combined with the polarized protein-specific charge (PPC) force field, is used to explore the difference in the binding mechanism between p53-MDMX and p53-MDM2. The interaction of a 12mer peptide inhibitor (pDIQ), which is similar to p53 in structure, with MDMX/MDM2 is also studied. The results demonstrate that p53/pDIQ with MDM2 generates a stronger interaction than with MDMX. Compared to p53, pDIQ has larger binding free energies with MDMX and MDM2. According to the calculated binding free energies, the differences in the binding free energy among the four complexes that are obtained from the combination of PPC and IE are more consistent with the experimental values than with the results from the combination of the non-polarizable AMBER force field and IE. In addition, according to the decomposition of the binding free energy, the van der Waals (vdW) interactions are the main driving force for the binding of the four complexes. They are also the main source of the weaker binding affinity of p53/pDIQ-MDMX relative to p53/pDIQ-MDM2. Compared with p53-MDMX/MDM2, according to the analysis of the residue decomposition, the predicated total residue contributions are higher in pDIQ-MDMX/MDM2 than in p53-MDMX/MDM2, which explains why pDIQ has higher binding affinity than p53 with MDMX/MDM2. The current study provides theoretical guidance for understanding the binding mechanisms and designing a potent dual inhibitor that is targeted to MDMX/MDM2.

Exploring the Reasons for Decrease in Binding Affinity of HIV-2 Against HIV-1 Protease Complex Using Interaction Entropy Under Polarized Force Field

In this study, the differences of binding patterns between two type HIV (HIV-1 and HIV-2) protease and two inhibitors (darunavir and amprenavir) are analyzed and compared using the newly developed interaction entropy (IE) method for the entropy change calculation combined with the polarized force field. The functional role of protonation states in the two HIV-2 complexes is investigated and our study finds that the protonated OD1 atom of Asp25' in B chain is the optimal choice. Those calculated binding free energies obtained from the polarized force field combined with IE method are significantly consistent with the experimental observed. The bridging water W301 is favorable to the binding of HIV-1 complexes; however, it is unfavorable to the HIV-2 complexes in current study. The volume of pocket, B-factor of Cα atoms and the distance of flap tip in HIV-2 complexes are smaller than that of HIV-1 consistently. These changes may cause localized rearrangement of residues lining their surface and finally result in the different binding mode for the two types HIV. Predicated hot-spot residues (Ala28/Ala28', Ile50/Ile50', and Ile84/Ile84') are nearly same in the four systems. However, the contribution to the free energy of Asp30 residue is more favorable in HIV-1 system than in HIV-2 system. Current study, to some extent, reveals the origin for the decrease in binding affinity of inhibitors against HIV-2 compared with HIV-1 and will provides theoretical guidance for future design of potent dual inhibitors targeting two type HIV protease.