IonQuant Enables Accurate and Sensitive Label-Free Quantification With FDR-Controlled Match-Between-Runs

Missing values weaken the power of label-free quantitative proteomic experiments to uncover true quantitative differences between biological samples or experimental conditions. Match-between-runs (MBR) has become a common approach to mitigate the missing value problem, where peptides identified by tandem mass spectra in one run are transferred to another by inference based on m/z, charge state, retention time, and ion mobility when applicable. Though tolerances are used to ensure such transferred identifications are reasonably located and meet certain quality thresholds, little work has been done to evaluate the statistical confidence of MBR. Here, we present a mixture model-based approach to estimate the false discovery rate (FDR) of peptide and protein identification transfer, which we implement in the label-free quantification tool IonQuant. Using several benchmarking datasets generated on both Orbitrap and timsTOF mass spectrometers, we demonstrate superior performance of IonQuant with FDR-controlled MBR compared with MaxQuant (19-38 times faster; 6-18% more proteins quantified and with comparable or better accuracy). We further illustrate the performance of IonQuant and highlight the need for FDR-controlled MBR, in two single-cell proteomics experiments, including one acquired with the help of high-field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry separation. Fully integrated in the FragPipe computational environment, IonQuant with FDR-controlled MBR enables fast and accurate peptide and protein quantification in label-free proteomics experiments.

Peak Identification and Quantification by Proteomic Mass Spectrogram Decomposition

Recent advances in the liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) technology have improved the sensitivity, resolution, and speed of proteome analysis, resulting in increasing demand for more sophisticated algorithms to interpret complex mass spectrograms. Here, we propose a novel statistical method, proteomic mass spectrogram decomposition (ProtMSD), for joint identification and quantification of peptides and proteins. Given the proteomic mass spectrogram and the reference mass spectra of all possible peptide ions associated with proteins as a dictionary, ProtMSD estimates the chromatograms of those peptide ions under a group sparsity constraint without using the conventional careful preprocessing (e.g., thresholding and peak picking). We show that the method was significantly improved using protein-peptide hierarchical relationships, isotopic distribution profiles, reference retention times of peptide ions, and prelearned mass spectra of noise. We examined the concept of database search, library search, and match-between-runs. Our ProtMSD showed excellent agreements of 3277 peptide ions (94.79%) and 493 proteins (98.21%) with Mascot/Skyline for an Escherichia coli proteome sample and of 4460 peptide ions (103%) and 588 proteins (101%) with match-between-runs by MaxQuant for a yeast proteome sample. This is the first attempt to use a matrix decomposition technique as a tool for LC/MS-based proteome identification and quantification.

Evaluating False Transfer Rates from the Match-between-Runs Algorithm with a Two-Proteome Model

Stochasticity between independent LC-MS/MS runs is a challenging problem in the field of proteomics, resulting in significant missing values (i.e., abundance measurements) among observed peptides. To address this issue, several approaches have been developed including computational methods such as MaxQuant's match-between-runs (MBR) algorithm. Often dozens of runs are all considered at once by MBR, transferring identifications from any one run to any of the others. To evaluate the error associated with these transfer events, we created a two-sample/two-proteome approach. In this way, samples containing no yeast lysate (n = 20) were assessed for false identification transfers from samples containing yeast (n = 20). While MBR increased the total number of spectral identifications by ∼40%, we also found that 44% of all identified yeast proteins had identifications transferred to at least one sample without yeast. However, of these only 2.7% remained in the final data set after applying the MaxQuant LFQ algorithm. We conclude that false transfers by MBR are plentiful, but few are retained in the final data set.