1
|
Bopp SK, Barouki R, Brack W, Dalla Costa S, Dorne JLCM, Drakvik PE, Faust M, Karjalainen TK, Kephalopoulos S, van Klaveren J, Kolossa-Gehring M, Kortenkamp A, Lebret E, Lettieri T, Nørager S, Rüegg J, Tarazona JV, Trier X, van de Water B, van Gils J, Bergman Å. Current EU research activities on combined exposure to multiple chemicals. Environ Int 2018; 120:544-562. [PMID: 30170309 PMCID: PMC6192826 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Humans and wildlife are exposed to an intractably large number of different combinations of chemicals via food, water, air, consumer products, and other media and sources. This raises concerns about their impact on public and environmental health. The risk assessment of chemicals for regulatory purposes mainly relies on the assessment of individual chemicals. If exposure to multiple chemicals is considered in a legislative framework, it is usually limited to chemicals falling within this framework and co-exposure to chemicals that are covered by a different regulatory framework is often neglected. Methodologies and guidance for assessing risks from combined exposure to multiple chemicals have been developed for different regulatory sectors, however, a harmonised, consistent approach for performing mixture risk assessments and management across different regulatory sectors is lacking. At the time of this publication, several EU research projects are running, funded by the current European Research and Innovation Programme Horizon 2020 or the Seventh Framework Programme. They aim at addressing knowledge gaps and developing methodologies to better assess chemical mixtures, by generating and making available internal and external exposure data, developing models for exposure assessment, developing tools for in silico and in vitro effect assessment to be applied in a tiered framework and for grouping of chemicals, as well as developing joint epidemiological-toxicological approaches for mixture risk assessment and for prioritising mixtures of concern. The projects EDC-MixRisk, EuroMix, EUToxRisk, HBM4EU and SOLUTIONS have started an exchange between the consortia, European Commission Services and EU Agencies, in order to identify where new methodologies have become available and where remaining gaps need to be further addressed. This paper maps how the different projects contribute to the data needs and assessment methodologies and identifies remaining challenges to be further addressed for the assessment of chemical mixtures.
Collapse
Key Words
- ao, adverse outcome
- aop, adverse outcome pathway
- bmd, benchmark dose modelling
- bqe, biological quality element
- ca, concentration addition
- cag, cumulative assessment group
- cmep, chemical monitoring and emerging pollutants
- cra, cumulative risk assessment
- dart, developmental and reproductive toxicity
- deb, dynamic energy budget
- ebt, effect-based tools
- edc, endocrine disrupting chemical
- eqs, environmental quality standard
- hbm, human biomonitoring
- ia, independent action
- iata, integrated approach to testing and assessment
- ipra, integrated probabilistic risk assessment
- ipsc, induced pluripotent stem cells
- loe, lines of evidence
- mcr, maximum cumulative ratio
- mcra, monte carlo risk assessment tool
- mec, measured exposure concentration
- moa, mode of action
- mra, mixture risk assessment
- msfd, marine strategy framework directive
- nam, new approach methodology
- pbtk, physiologically based toxicokinetic (model)
- pec, predicted exposure concentration
- pnec, predicted no effect concentration
- qsar, quantitative structure activity relationship
- rdt, repeated dose systemic toxicity
- tk, toxicokinetic
- smri, similar mixture risk indicator
- syrina, systematic review and integrated assessment
- ttc, threshold of toxicological concern
- wfd, water framework directive
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie K Bopp
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Ispra, Italy.
| | - Robert Barouki
- INSERM UMR-S 1124, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
| | - Werner Brack
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Silvia Dalla Costa
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate B - Growth and Innovation, Ispra, Italy.
| | - Jean-Lou C M Dorne
- Scientific Committee and Emerging Risks Unit, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy.
| | - Paula E Drakvik
- Swetox, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Toxicology Sciences, Södertälje, Sweden.
| | - Michael Faust
- Faust & Backhaus Environmental Consulting, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Tuomo K Karjalainen
- European Commission, Directorate General Research and Innovation, Directorate E - Health, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Stylianos Kephalopoulos
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate F - Health, Consumers and Reference Materials, Ispra, Italy.
| | - Jacob van Klaveren
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Andreas Kortenkamp
- Institute for Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Erik Lebret
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences - IRAS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Teresa Lettieri
- European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Directorate D - Sustainable Resources, Ispra, Italy.
| | - Sofie Nørager
- European Commission, Directorate General Research and Innovation, Directorate E - Health, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Joëlle Rüegg
- Swetox, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Toxicology Sciences, Södertälje, Sweden.
| | - Jose V Tarazona
- Pesticides Unit, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy.
| | - Xenia Trier
- European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Bob van de Water
- Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Åke Bergman
- Swetox, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Toxicology Sciences, Södertälje, Sweden; School of Science and Technology, MTM, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Settivari RS, Ball N, Murphy L, Rasoulpour R, Boverhof DR, Carney EW. Predicting the future: opportunities and challenges for the chemical industry to apply 21st-century toxicity testing. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2015; 54:214-223. [PMID: 25836969 PMCID: PMC4382627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2014] [Revised: 05/27/2014] [Accepted: 08/26/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Interest in applying 21st-century toxicity testing tools for safety assessment of industrial chemicals is growing. Whereas conventional toxicology uses mainly animal-based, descriptive methods, a paradigm shift is emerging in which computational approaches, systems biology, high-throughput in vitro toxicity assays, and high-throughput exposure assessments are beginning to be applied to mechanism-based risk assessments in a time- and resource-efficient fashion. Here we describe recent advances in predictive safety assessment, with a focus on their strategic application to meet the changing demands of the chemical industry and its stakeholders. The opportunities to apply these new approaches is extensive and include screening of new chemicals, informing the design of safer and more sustainable chemical alternatives, filling information gaps on data-poor chemicals already in commerce, strengthening read-across methodology for categories of chemicals sharing similar modes of action, and optimizing the design of reduced-risk product formulations. Finally, we discuss how these predictive approaches dovetail with in vivo integrated testing strategies within repeated-dose regulatory toxicity studies, which are in line with 3Rs principles to refine, reduce, and replace animal testing. Strategic application of these tools is the foundation for informed and efficient safety assessment testing strategies that can be applied at all stages of the product-development process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raja S Settivari
- Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, USA.
| | - Nicholas Ball
- Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, USA
| | - Lynea Murphy
- Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, USA
| | - Reza Rasoulpour
- Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, USA
| | - Darrell R Boverhof
- Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, USA
| | - Edward W Carney
- Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|