Increased Sleep Latency and Decreased Sleep Duration are Associated With Elevated Risk of Bed Sharing Among Mother-Infant Dyads

Bed sharing increases risk of sleep-related infant deaths. We hypothesized that infant sleep difficulties increase bed sharing, independent of social determinants of health (SDOH). In total, 191 mother-infant dyads in a prospective, longitudinal cohort study completed the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire at 1, 4, 6, and 12 months. Sleep characteristics at 1 month (latency, duration, night awakenings) were compared between dyads with/without bed sharing in the first 12 months. Infants who participated in bed sharing slept fewer hours at night (7.1 ± 1.7 hours vs 8.3 ± 1.5 hours, P = .001, d = -0.79), and took longer to fall asleep (0.7 ± 0.6 hours vs 0.5 ± 0.5 hours, P = .021, d = 0.43), even when controlling for SDOH variables that influence bed sharing. Maternal perception of sleep problems did not differ between groups (P = .12). Our findings suggest that infants with quantifiable sleep difficulties at 1 month are more likely to bed share.

Photos Shared on Facebook in the Context of Safe Sleep Recommendations: Content Analysis of Images

Background

Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) remains a leading cause of infant mortality; therefore, understanding parental practices of infant sleep at home is essential. Since social media analyses yield invaluable patient perspectives, understanding sleep practices in the context of safe sleep recommendations via a Facebook mothers' group is instrumental for policy makers, health care providers, and researchers.

Objective

This study aimed to identify photos shared by mothers discussing SUID and safe sleep online and assess their consistency with infant sleep guidelines per the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). We hypothesized the photos would not be consistent with guidelines based on prior research and increasing rates of accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed.

Methods

Data were extracted from a Facebook mothers' group in May 2019. After trialing various search terms, searching for the term "SIDS" on the selected Facebook group resulted in the most relevant discussions on SUID and safe sleep. The resulting data, including 20 posts and 912 comments among 512 mothers, were extracted and underwent qualitative descriptive content analysis. In completing the extraction and subsequent analysis, 24 shared personal photos were identified among the discussions. Of the photos, 14 pertained to the infant sleep environment. Photos of the infant sleep environment were then assessed for consistency with safe sleep guidelines per the AAP standards by 2 separate reviewers.

Results

Of the shared photos relating to the infant sleep environment, 86% (12/14) were not consistent with AAP safe sleep guidelines. Specific inconsistencies included prone sleeping, foreign objects in the sleeping environment, and use of infant sleeping devices. Use of infant monitoring devices was also identified.

Conclusions

This study is unique because the photos originated from the home setting, were in the context of SUID and safe sleep, and were obtained without researcher interference. Despite study limitations, the commonality of prone sleeping, foreign objects, and the use of both infant sleep and monitoring devices (ie, overall inconsistency regarding AAP safe sleep guidelines) sets the stage for future investigation regarding parental barriers to practicing safe infant sleep and has implications for policy makers, clinicians, and researchers.

Infant Safe Sleep in the District of Columbia: Better for Both

Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) rates within the District of Columbia (DC) vary, with rates 3 times higher in certain geographical areas than the cumulative rate in DC and 7 times higher than the national rate. The majority SUIDs are due to unsafe sleep practices. Although safe sleep education and resources are available in these areas, the high sleep-related infant mortality suggests unmet barriers to infant safe sleep. We sought to investigate potential contributions to local infant mortality through focus groups regarding infant sleep practices among DC caregivers. In this qualitative study, caregivers were probed regarding barriers and facilitators of infant sleep practices. Data were collected until thematic saturation was reached, then coded. Themes were developed and revised in an iterative manner. Fifteen caregivers participated in three focus groups. Themes included sources of infant sleep knowledge, challenges for infant sleep, and motivators for infant sleep choice. All caregivers reported knowledge of safe sleep practices. Infant sleep practices varied, and included unsafe practices such as bed sharing, co-sleeping, and use of swings or bouncers for infant sleep. Challenges of adhering to safe sleep practices included infant needs, competing family demands, the overwhelming nature of newborn sleep, threats, and conflicting information. Motivators for infant sleep practices included better sleep, convenience, safety, tradition, and needs of the infant and caregiver. Although caregivers report knowledge of safe sleep recommendations, actual infant sleep practices vary and include unsafe sleep practices. More focused interventions are needed to address this gap between safe sleep knowledge and practice.

Perspective: Supporting Maternal Efforts to Provide Optimal Infant Nutrition in the Post-Partum Setting

Supporting optimal newborn nutrition and the positive maternal-infant relationship while encouraging safe sleep practices are essential components of maternal and newborn care in the hospital setting following birth. Breastfeeding is widely recognized as the best practice to support the nutritional needs and well-being of the infant, and recommendations have been developed by the WHO, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the United States Centers for Disease Control to encourage and successfully support breastfeeding efforts before hospital discharge. The 10 Steps to Successful Breastfeeding, developed and promoted by the WHO, form the basis of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and have become the international framework for public health initiatives to promote breastfeeding. An evaluation of hospital performance implementing the 10 steps through the process of "Baby-Friendly Designation" (BFD) has been suggested by many breastfeeding advocates as the optimal pathway to attain the goals of the BFHI. However, the WHO has recognized that BFD may not be an appropriate goal in all settings, and indicated, as part of their updated 2018 guidance, that "facilities may make changes in their policies and procedures to obtain the designation, but these changes are not always sustainable, especially when there are no regular monitoring systems in place." In addition, unintended associated issues regarding newborn safety and maternal dissatisfaction with some of the 10 steps have emerged. This perspective discusses the challenges faced by hospitals attempting to implement the BFHI 10 steps and suggests potential solutions to make progress in those efforts with or without BFD and also the efforts needed to support formula feedings when appropriate.

"Things changed very quickly": Maternal intentions and decision-making about infant sleep surface, location, and position

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 3400 infants die suddenly and unexpectedly each year in the United States; many of these deaths include modifiable risk factors (such as a non-supine position, sleeping on a soft surface, or loose bedding or items in the environment). Interventions have been successful at improving parental knowledge about recommendations to reduce risk of sleep-related infant deaths, as well as improving intention to adopt recommendations. However, follow-up studies have found a disconnect between knowledge/intentions to adhere to recommendations and actual practices. Exploring maternal decision-making about infant sleep practices can better elucidate the disconnect between knowledge of infant sleep recommendations and the practice of it, and thus, inform more effective safe sleep interventions. The purpose of this study was to gain a more in-depth understanding of decision-making around infant sleep practices, and barriers and facilitators to adopting safe infant sleep recommendations.

METHODS

Semi-structured in-home interviews were conducted with 22 families (20 mothers and 2 mother-father dyads) of infants up to 6 months of age.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis of the transcripts revealed six themes: Plans changed when baby came, Trying things to figure out what works (infant preferences), Safety concerns, What's comfortable for me (maternal preferences), They say…(advice), and Trying to be careful.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that knowledge of infant sleep recommendations alone is not enough to ensure adherence and that decision-making is a dynamic and ongoing process affected by multiple factors. Findings have implications for timing and content of risk reduction efforts, as well as for data collection in research studies.

COVID-19 Impact on Group Prenatal Education: A Comparison of Virtual and In-Person Formats

This retrospective study compared knowledge, intention, and satisfaction outcomes between pregnant women who attended prenatal education in person (n = 202; 55%) prior to the COVID-19 pandemic or virtually (n = 166; 45%) during the pandemic. Results identified increases in knowledge and intention for a healthy pregnancy and safe infant care for both groups. Virtual participants were less likely to endorse developing a birth plan (p = 0.035), knowledge of breastfeeding resources (p = 0.006), confidence in the ability to breastfeed (p = 0.033), and plans to use only a safe infant sleep location (p = 0.045). Important education was provided by continuing Baby Talk during the pandemic. However, topics with activities/demonstrations during in-person learning that were discontinued for virtual learning had significantly lower increases for virtual participants. Virtual education should incorporate more demonstrations/activities.

The influence of video-based training on caregiver arrangement of infant sleeping environments

Recent behavior analytic studies have examined behavioral skills training to teach adults to arrange safe infant sleeping environments. These studies were conducted in an analogue environment and with all training components delivered by an expert staff trainer. The purpose of the current study was to replicate and extend this literature by substituting video-based training for behavioral skills training. We assessed whether expectant caregivers could arrange safe infant sleeping environments following video-based training. The results suggested that video-based training alone resulted in positive outcomes for a portion of participants, whereas a subset of participants required feedback to reach mastery criteria. The social validity data suggest that the participants found the training procedures favorable.

Evaluating caregivers arrangement of infant sleeping environments in the home

Sleep-related infant deaths are one of the top causes of infant mortality in the United States. A few behavior analytic studies have examined behavioral skills training to teach adults to arrange safe infant sleeping environments. These studies were conducted in an analogue environment, and no data were collected outside the training setting. The purpose of the current study was to replicate and extend the extant literature. We taught caregivers to arrange safe infant sleeping environments in a community-based organization. Thereafter, we assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of a technology-based contingency management procedure to examine caregivers' adherence with arrangement of a safe sleeping environment for their newborns across a 2-week period. As in previous studies, behavioral skills training resulted in positive outcomes, and follow-up data suggested that the technology-based contingency management procedure may be a promising approach to promoting adherence with infant sleeping environment recommendations.

Modeling of infant safe sleep practice in a newborn nursery: a quality improvement initiative

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is a leading cause of infant mortality in the US. The American Academy of Pediatrics has provided recommendations for infant sleeping position and environment to decrease SIDS rates. These recommendations reinforce the importance of modeling safe sleep practices in the newborn nursery. Although many quality improvement initiatives have been undertaken to improve safe sleep in the nursery, such efforts are sparse in low-volume birth hospitals. This project aimed to improve infant sleep practices in a 10-bed level I nursery using visual cues (crib cards) and nursing education. We defined "safe sleep practice" if a newborn slept in a safe position in a flat bassinet and in a safe environment. We measured safe sleep practices before and after the intervention using an audit tool. As a result, safe sleep practices improved from 32% (30/95) preintervention to 75% (86/115) postintervention (P < 0.01). This study demonstrates that implementing a quality improvement initiative to improve infant sleep practices in a low-volume nursery is feasible and impactful.

Prevalence and Predictors of Postpartum Cosleeping Practices after Midwife-Led Births in the US

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patterns of mother-infant sleeping behaviors among US-based mothers who received care from midwives and breastfed their infants the majority of time at 6 weeks postpartum.

STUDY DESIGN

Infant sleep locations were reported for 24 915 mother-infant dyads followed through 6 weeks postpartum, following midwife-led singleton births. Using data derived from medical records, we used multinomial logistic regression to identify predictors of sleep location.

RESULTS

The median maternal age was 31 years (IQR, 27-34 years). The majority were White (84.5%), reported having a partner or spouse (95%), had a community birth (87%), and reported bedsharing with their infant for part (13.2%) or most of the night (43.8%). In the adjusted analysis, positive predictors of always bedsharing included increasing maternal age (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.13-1.21; per 5 years), cesarean birth (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.86), Medicaid eligibility (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.62-1.91), and maternal race/ethnicity (Black OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.09-1.79]; Latinx OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.35-1.74]; multiracial OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.39-2.07]). Negative predictors of bedsharing included having a partner/spouse (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.77) and birth location in hospitals (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.49-0.64) or birthing centers (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.44-0.51). Partial breastfeeding dyads were less likely to bedshare than those who were exclusively breastfeeding (always bedsharing OR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.41-0.56]; sometimes bedsharing OR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.56-0.83]).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that cosleeping is common among US families who choose community births, most of whom exclusively breastfeed through at least 6 weeks.

Emergency Department Visits Before Sudden Unexpected Infant Death: A Touchpoint for Unsafe Sleep Reduction

OBJECTIVES

Unsafe sleep remains a leading cause of preventable sudden unexpected infant death (SUID). Infants frequently visit emergency departments (EDs), but the frequency of visits before SUID is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine how often SUID infants visited a pediatric ED or urgent care (UC) before death.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of infant deaths in the county of a large, academic pediatric institution. We linked institutional records with coroner reports and death scene investigations. We excluded deaths associated with childbirth, prematurity, injury, or underlying medical condition. We characterized all SUID infants, focusing on unsafe sleep factors detailed in the medical record and scene reports. The main outcome was ED/UC visit(s) before the visit for SUID.

RESULTS

Seventy-three of 122 infant deaths met inclusion criteria for SUID over 76 months (April 2014-July 2020). Median age at death was 87 days (IQR 58, 137); 68 (93%) died before 6 months-of-age. Twenty infants (27%) had an ED/UC visit before SUID; mean visits for these infants were 1.7 (SD 0.8). Median days between the last ED/UC visit and SUID was 39; five infants visited the ED/UC within 2 weeks of SUID. Most visits were for minor medical conditions. All 73 SUID infants had at least one unsafe sleep factor; 88% had ≥2 and 56% ≥3.

CONCLUSIONS

Many SUID infants visited a pediatric ED/UC before death, and unsafe sleep factors were found in every case. Early infancy ED/UC visits may present an opportunity for targeted prevention efforts.

The Impact of Breastfeeding and Safe Sleep Mobile Health Messaging on Breastfeeding and Bedsharing

OBJECTIVE

Mobile health (mHealth) safe sleep messaging increases rates of safe sleep. Bedsharing is more common among breastfeeders. Advice to not bedshare may negatively impact breastfeeding. We compared the impact of safe sleep or breastfeeding mHealth messaging on bedsharing and breastfeeding at 2 to 5 months.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of mothers who initiated breastfeeding from a cluster randomized clinical trial of mHealth messaging for safe sleep or breastfeeding. A multi-ethnic sample of 1600 mothers was recruited from 16 US birth hospitals and surveyed at 2 to 5 months regarding the previous 2 weeks' breastfeeding and bedsharing practices. Data on 997 mothers who initiated breastfeeding were analyzed with multivariable generalized estimating logistic regression models to examine the association of mHealth messaging with infant care practices.

RESULTS

Overall, exposure to breastfeeding versus safe sleep messaging was not associated with a difference in any breastfeeding at 2 to 5 months (69.3% vs 65.5%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.33 [95% confidence interval, 0.91, 1.94]). Women with shorter planned duration of breastfeeding who received breastfeeding messaging had increased odds of breastfeeding at 2 to 5 months (50% vs 31%; aOR 3.13 [95% CI, 1.47, 6.65]). Mothers who received safe sleep messaging had lower rates of bedsharing overall when compared to breastfeeding messaging (24.8% vs 35.2%; aOR = 0.58 [95% CI, 0.44, 0.78]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large multi-ethnic US sample, receipt of safe sleep mHealth messaging was associated with lower rates of bedsharing without negatively impacting breastfeeding rates. Future research should focus on continued development of interventions to improve adherence to both safe sleep and breastfeeding recommendations.

Safe Sleep Program for the NICU Nursing Staff: A Pilot Program

PURPOSE

Following an assessment of safe sleep practices (SSP) and nurses' safe sleep knowledge in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), an evidence-based 2-part safe sleep program including nurse education and the use of safe sleep cards was developed in an attempt to increase SSP.

DESIGN

A quality improvement project with time-series methodology, including observational and survey data collection.

SAMPLE

To assess SSP, sleep environment audits were completed pre- (N = 48) and post- safe sleep program (N = 44). To assess nurses' safe sleep knowledge, a safe sleep questionnaire was distributed pre-education (N = 48) and post-education (N = 23).

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE

The change in SSP (ΔSSP) following safe sleep program implementation and change in nurses' safe sleep knowledge (ΔKnowledge) following education.

RESULTS

SSP increased from 25 percent to 61 percent compliance, and nurses' knowledge scores increased from 83 percent to 97 percent.

Missed Opportunities: Healthcare Encounters Prior to Sudden Unexpected Infant Death

INTRODUCTION

Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) is the leading cause of death in children 28 days to 1 year of age. The study aim was to identify opportunities for healthcare professionals to provide families with education on sleep and prevention of SUID.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of SUID infants over 10 years (12/2010-12/2020). The study included patients 0-12 months who presented to single institution with SUID (including asphyxia, suffocation, and SIDS). Baseline descriptive characteristics, sleep patterns (location, position, co-sleeping, presence of pillows/blankets), and prior healthcare encounters (type, duration, frequency, timing) were described.

RESULTS

Thirty-five infants met inclusion criteria. Twenty-three percent of families routinely practiced unsafe sleep, while 63% practiced unsafe sleep at the time of SUID. All unsafe sleep behaviors increased during the SUID event compared to routine, including inappropriate location (60%), co-sleeping (46%), and inappropriate position (37%) at the time of SUID. There were 54 total healthcare encounters (mean 1.5 per patient +/- 2.1) prior to SUID. Primary care physicians (57%) and NICU (29%) were the most frequent prior healthcare encounters, however visits spanned multiple specialties. Twenty-six percent had a healthcare encounter within 7 days of their death.

DISCUSSION

We demonstrated the frequency and variability in healthcare encounters among SUID infants prior to their death. Majority of infants had prior healthcare encounters, with 26% seen by healthcare professionals within 7 days of their death. These results highlight the important role healthcare professionals across all specialties have the potential to play in educating families about safe sleep and SUID.

Promoting Safe Sleep, Tobacco Cessation, and Breastfeeding to Rural Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Quasi-Experimental Study

BACKGROUND

Safe Sleep Community Baby Showers address strategies to prevent sleep-related infant deaths. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, these events transitioned from in-person to virtual.

OBJECTIVE

This study describes outcomes of transitioning Safe Sleep Community Baby Showers to a virtual format and compares outcomes to previous in-person events.

METHODS

Participants from four rural Kansas counties were emailed the presurvey, provided educational materials (videos, livestream, or digital documents), and completed a postsurvey. Those who completed both surveys received a portable crib and wearable blanket. Within-group comparisons were assessed between pre- and postsurveys; between-group comparisons (virtual vs in-person) were assessed by postsurveys.

RESULTS

Based on data from 145 in-person and 74 virtual participants, virtual participants were more likely to be married (P<.001) and have private insurance (P<.001), and were less likely to report tobacco use (P<.001). Both event formats significantly increased knowledge and intentions regarding safe sleep and avoidance of secondhand smoke (all P≤.001). Breastfeeding intentions did not change. Differences were observed between in-person and virtual meetings regarding confidence in the ability to avoid secondhand smoke (in-person: 121/144, 84% vs virtual: 53/74, 72%; P=.03), intention to breastfeed ≥6 months (in-person: 79/128, 62% vs virtual: 52/66, 79%; P=.008), and confidence in the ability to breastfeed ≥6 months (in-person: 58/123, 47% vs virtual: 44/69, 64%; P=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both event formats demonstrated increased knowledge/intentions to follow safe sleep recommendations, virtual events may further marginalize groups who are at high risk for poor birth outcomes. Strategies to increase technology access, recruit priority populations, and ensure disparities are not exacerbated will be critical for the implementation of future virtual events.

Infant Safe Sleep Practices as Portrayed on Instagram: Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Parenting practices are highly influenced by perceived social norms. Social norms and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines for infant safe sleep practices are often inconsistent. Instagram has become one of the most popular social media websites among young adults (including many expectant and new parents). We hypothesized that the majority of Instagram images of infant sleep and sleep environments are inconsistent with AAP guidelines, and that the number of "likes" for each image would not correlate with adherence of the image to these guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the extent of adherence of Instagram images of infant sleep and sleep environments to safe infant sleep guidelines.

METHODS

We searched Instagram using hashtags that were relevant to infant sleeping practices and environments. We then used an open-source web scraper to collect images and the number of "likes" for each image from 27 hashtags. Images were analyzed for adherence to AAP safe sleep guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 1563 images (1134 of sleeping infant; 429 of infant sleep environment without sleeping infant) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Only 117 (7.49%) of the 1563 images were consistent with AAP guidelines. The most common reasons for inconsistency with AAP guidelines were presence of bedding (1173/1563, 75.05%) and nonrecommended sleep position (479/1134, 42.24%). The number of "likes" was not correlated with adherence of the image to AAP guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Although individuals who use Instagram and post pictures of sleeping infants or infant sleep environments may not actually use these practices regularly, the consistent portrayal of images inconsistent with AAP guidelines reinforces that these practices are normative and may influence the practice of young parents.

Infants' Sleep: Israeli Parents' Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices

The purpose of the study was to assess Israeli parents' knowledge of and attitudes towards practices promoting infants' safe sleep and their compliance with such practices. Researchers visited the homes of 335 parents in 59 different residential locations in Israel and collected their responses to structured questionnaires. SPSS 25 statistical package for data analysis was used. Attitude scales were created after the reliability tests and scaled means of parental attitudes were compared between independent groups differentiated by gender, ethnicity, and parental experience. A logistic regression was run to predict the outcome variable of babies' sleep positions. The total knowledge score was significantly higher for women (56.3%) than for men (28.6%; p < 0.001). Arabs were more committed to following recommendations (29.3%) than Jews (26.9%; p < 0.001). Consistent with safe sleep recommendations, 92% of the sampled parents reported avoiding bedsharing and 89% reported using a firm mattress and fitted sheets. The risk of not placing a baby to sleep in a supine position was higher among older parents (adjusted odds ratio-AOR = 0.36, 95%CI 0.16-0.82), smoking fathers (AOR = 2.66, 95%CI 1.12-6.33), parents who did not trust recommendations (AOR = 4.03, 95%CI 1.84-8.84), parents not committed to following recommendations (AOR = 2.83, 95%CI 1.21-6.60), and parents whose baby slept in their room (AOR = 0.38, 95%CI 0.17-0.88). Knowledge of safe sleep recommendations was not associated with actual parental practices. Trust of and commitment to recommendations were positively correlated with safe sleep position practices. It is essential to develop ethnic-/gender-focused intervention programs.

Safe sleep community baby showers to reduce infant mortality risk factors for women who speak Spanish

OBJECTIVES

In the United States, sleep-related deaths are one of the primary causes of death for infants age 28 days to one year. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) developed Safe Sleep Recommendations which provide risk reduction strategies for sleep-related infant deaths. Interventions such as Safe Sleep Community Baby Showers have increased knowledge and intentions to engage in these safe sleep behaviors for women who speak English. This study assessed the feasibility, acceptability and initial outcomes of Safe Sleep Community Baby Showers for women who speak Spanish.

METHODS

Six Spanish Safe Sleep Community Baby Showers were held in Sedgwick County, Kansas. One hundred forty-six pregnant or recently delivered women who spoke Spanish completed pre- and post-assessments. Univariate comparisons were made using McNemar's test for paired dichotomous variables.

RESULTS

Participants had a high school diploma/General Educational Diploma (GED) or less (75.3%), and were uninsured (52.1%) or had Medicaid (n = 49; 33.6%). The majority reported being very satisfied (n = 130; 89.0%) or satisfied (n = 8; 5.5%). Compared to baseline, significant increases in intentions and confidence to follow the AAP Safe Sleep Recommendations were observed following the events. The majority of participants reported intending to place their infant on the back to sleep (98.6%), use only a safe surface (crib, portable crib, bassinet; 99.3%), and only include safe items (firm mattress, fitted sheet; 93.5%) (all p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings support both feasibility and acceptability of modifying Safe Sleep Community Baby Showers to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate education for women who speak Spanish. Initial outcomes suggest increased intentions to follow safe sleep recommendations.

A comparison of safe sleep violations in child care and family child care learning homes in Georgia

BACKGROUND

High rates of infant death associated with sleeping practices continue to persist in the United States. Infants spend a large portion of their day with child care and family child care learning home providers. Safe sleeping practices continue to be an area of need for care providers of young children.

METHOD

The current study examines data drawn from a publicly available database of child care licensing reports in Georgia (n = 3,501), which contained data on child care centres and family child care learning homes. Information in the database included characteristics of the centres, year of data collection and the specific violations by child care provider type.

RESULTS

Results indicated clear differences in the prevalence of violations between child care centres and family child care learning homes. Within the overall sample, 13.3% of centres and family child care learning homes were cited for safe sleeping practice violations with higher prevalence in licensed child care centres and unaccredited centres. Violations were consistent with those commonly found in child care environments and inconsistent with the American Academy of Pediatrics safe sleep recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the current study suggest a continued need for professional learning on safe sleep practices.

Are Safe Sleep Practice Recommendations For Infants Being Applied Among Caregivers?

Background

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is defined as the sudden unexpected death of an infant, even after investigations and autopsy. SIDS is related to many factors, such as the baby’s position and objects in the crib. Adherence to safe sleep recommendations in Saudi Arabia is unclear. This study aims to assess caregivers’ implementation of safe sleep practices and if they received any safe sleep education through health care workers.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional, descriptive study. Inclusion criteria included all infants below the age of one year. Exclusion criteria included infants who were born premature, used ventilation, had a tracheostomy, any anomaly in the upper airway, or underwent spine surgery. A semi-structured questionnaire was used. Data were collected from mothers who had infants visiting the outpatient department of King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. An electronic survey was also created and published on a social platform. 

Statistical analysis was conducted with the aid of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 26 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY).

Results

Among 506 participants, only 22.5% were found to receive education about safe practices from health care providers. Fortunately, most of the infants (63.2%) were found to sleep in a supine position most of the nights. Adherent caregivers to placing the child in a designated baby bed and in a supine position most nights represented 44.86% of the sample. However, when asked about placing any of the following objects in the bed (pillows, blankets, soft toys, hard toys, and electric wires), the percentage of adherence dropped down to only 1.58%.

Conclusion

There was an obvious non-adherence among caregivers and a possible lack of knowledge of safe sleep recommendations for infants. This highlights the need for optimal education by health care workers and the rule of media and campaigns is obvious and essential to improving their practices and, hopefully, decreasing the risk of SIDS.

Association between Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission and Supine Sleep Positioning, Breastfeeding, and Postnatal Smoking among Mothers of Late Preterm Infants

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and breastfeeding practices, infant supine sleep positioning, and postnatal smoking among mothers of late preterm infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from 36 states using the 2000-2013 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System were analyzed. χ² tests and 95% CI assessed infant and maternal characteristics and recommended care practices for late preterm infants based on NICU admission after birth. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) for breastfeeding initiation and continuation at 10 weeks, supine sleep position, and postnatal smoking were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models, controlling for infant and maternal characteristics. Analyses were weighted and SEs accounted for the complex survey design.

RESULTS

Our sample included 62 494 late preterm infants, representing a weighted population of 1 441 451 late preterm infants. In the adjusted analysis, mothers of late preterm infants admitted to a NICU were more likely to initiate breastfeeding (APR 1.07; 95% CI 1.05-1.09) and place their infants in supine sleep position (1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.06) than mothers of late preterm infants not admitted to a NICU. There was no significant difference between groups for breastfeeding continuation or postnatal smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

Mothers of late preterm infants admitted to a NICU were more likely to initiate breastfeeding and practice supine sleep position than mothers of late preterm infants not admitted to a NICU. Future work should seek to identify the drivers of these differences to develop effective strategies to engage mothers in these health promoting infant care practices.

Clinician Opinions and Approaches to Manage Risk Related to Safe Sleep During Skin-to-Skin Care

OBJECTIVE

To understand the opinions of clinicians about the risks, benefits, barriers, and facilitators to the practice of parent sleep during skin-to-skin care in hospital settings.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Online survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinicians who self-identified as infant care providers, that is, neonatal clinicians (N = 158).

METHODS

We sent an online survey invitation to neonatal clinicians through neonatal websites, conferences, and social media sites in the United States and used snowball recruitment. We used a risk management framework to analyze qualitative data. We used descriptive statistics and the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to determine if opinions differed based on clinician and organizational characteristics.

RESULTS

Respondents' support of parent sleep during skin-to-skin care (yes/no) did not differ on the basis of whether the clinician had taken a formal course on skin-to-skin care, facilitated skin-to-skin care more than 100 times, or frequently promoted skin-to-skin care in current practice. Respondents who supported parent sleep (n = 93, 59% of respondents) reported greater implementation of risk control strategies than nonsupporters (n = 53 [57%] vs. n = 3 [5%]; p < .001), such as frequent monitoring of vital signs (n = 33 [35%] vs. n = 2 [3%]; p < .001), use of devices to support skin-to-skin care (n = 49 [53%] vs. n = 19 [29%]; p = .003), and proper positioning (n = 20 [22%] vs. n = 0 [0%]; p < .001). Nonsupporters more frequently reported that parent sleep during skin-to-skin care violates safe sleep recommendations, is habit forming for home, poses a fall risk, and jeopardizes the infant's airway.

CONCLUSION

Most respondents supported parent sleep during skin-to-skin care, but concerns regarding safety for the infant remained a barrier. The use of a risk management framework may help facilitate a systematic approach to improve the implementation of safe skin-to-skin practices.

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome on Facebook: Qualitative Descriptive Content Analysis to Guide Prevention Efforts

Background

Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID), which includes the diagnosis of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), is a leading cause of infant mortality in the United States. Despite prevention efforts, many parents continue to create unsafe infant sleep environments and use potentially dangerous infant sleep and monitoring devices, ultimately leading to sleep-related infant deaths. Analyzing Facebook conversations regarding SIDS may offer a unique maternal perspective to guide future research and prevention efforts.

Objective

This study aims to describe and analyze conversations among mothers engaged in discussions about SIDS on a Facebook mother’s group. We were interested in understanding maternal knowledge of SIDS, identifying information sources for SIDS, describing actual infant sleep practices, exploring opinions regarding infant sleep products and monitoring devices, and discovering evidence of provider communication regarding SIDS.

Methods

We extracted and analyzed 20 posts and 912 comments from 512 mothers who participated in a specific Facebook mother’s group and engaged in conversations about SIDS. There were 2 reviewers who coded the data using qualitative descriptive content analysis. Themes were induced after discussion among researchers and after the study objectives were addressed.

Results

The theme of social support emerged, specifically informational and emotional support. A variety of informational sources for SIDS and safe sleep were identified, as was a continuum of infant sleep practices (ranging from unsafe to safe sleep per the American Academy of Pediatrics standards). There was widespread discussion regarding infant sleep products and monitoring devices. Embedded within conversations were (1) confusion among commonly used medical terminology, (2) the practice of unsafe infant sleep, (3) inconsistency in provider communication about SIDS, and (4) maternal anxiety regarding SIDS.

Conclusions

We uncovered new findings in this analysis, such as the commonality of infant sleep products and monitoring devices and widespread maternal anxiety regarding SIDS. Additionally, mothers who participated in the Facebook group provided and received informational and emotional support regarding SIDS via this social media format. Such results can guide future prevention efforts by informing health communication regarding SUID and safe sleep. Future provider and public health agency communication on the topic of SUID and safe sleep should be simple and clear, address infant sleep products and monitoring devices, address maternal anxiety regarding SIDS, and address the common practice of unsafe sleep.

Outpatient- or community-based interventions to prevent SIDS and sleep-related deaths

PURPOSE

To determine the state of science of outpatient- or community-based interventions for sudden infant death syndrome prevention in the United States, an integrative review was completed and studies identified through the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the nine studies identified, three were randomized controlled trials. There was a wide range of measurement tools and variables measured. The timing of interventions also varied. There was a focus on mothers and African Americans. Lastly, study design and approach have not changed significantly over time.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Findings highlight recommendations for future research: expanding the target population, addressing culture in the development of the intervention or program, including additional providers, such as nurses, in the intervention or program, advancing innovation, and increasing rigor of study design.

Generations in Families Talking Safe Sleep (GIFTSS): Randomized Controlled Trial of a Safe Sleep Educational Intervention for Young Pregnant Women

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and suffocation account for more than half of all Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths (SUID) and are leading causes of post-neonatal deaths. Risk reduction strategies, including supine sleep position and safe sleep environment, are critical for prevention. Teen mothers, especially those in rural, poor, southern states, are at higher risk due to low compliance with recommendations. We will conduct a randomized trial to test a tailored educational intervention on the sleep-related safety behaviors of teen mothers. In one study arm, the intervention will include not only the teen mothers but also senior caregivers (SCGs) to assess the influence they have in the decision-making of young mothers regarding infant health and safety. Our hypotheses are H1) teen mothers exposed to intervention will be more likely than controls to adopt safe sleep practices, and H2) teen mothers will be more likely to use those practices when they and their mothers or other significant female senior caregivers also participate in safe sleep education. Better understanding of the mediating role of female SCGs in the health decision of young mothers for their children may have implications for interventions addressing important health problems.

Considerations in Safe to Sleep® messaging: Learning from African-American mothers

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify why African-American mothers do not tend to follow the Safe to Sleep® recommendations and to begin to identify a way to frame the Safe to Sleep® message so that African-American mothers might be more likely to follow these recommendations.

DESIGN

We recruited African-American mothers with infants over the age of 6 months to participate in two focus groups facilitated by a community engagement manager experienced in focus group facilitation. We used ethnography to find shared patterns of behavior and beliefs in African-American women related to safe sleep.

RESULTS

We identified 14 concepts and formulated them into three categories: it's just easier; can't fight culture and grandma; and Effectively teaching mother. From these we were able to identify the shared value of multifaceted learning.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

African-American mothers say that they are generally aware of the Safe to Sleep® recommendations, even though the majority of mothers do not follow them. The reasons they give for not following them are that they are not comfortable doing so, they feel they are unable to do so, or find it unnecessary. Many of the mothers attempted to follow the Safe to Sleep® recommendations but abandoned the effort due to the stress of their crying infant. Trying to follow the Safe to Sleep® recommendations were stressful for the mothers, even though there was concern expressed by some that their infant could indeed suffocate or die from sudden infant death syndrome. The mothers gave suggestions on how they would change the message or the delivery of the message.

Implications of Mothers' Social Networks for Risky Infant Sleep Practices

OBJECTIVE

To describe the structure of networks in a cohort of mothers and to analyze associations of social network characteristics and norms with infant sleep practices.

STUDY DESIGN

We recruited a prospective cohort of mothers with infants <6 months of age from January 2015 to December 2016. Mothers completed a survey about their personal social networks and infant care practices. Latent class analysis identified unobserved network types. Binary statistics and path analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 402 mothers were surveyed. Latent class analysis identified 2 a priori unknown social network types: "exclusive" (restricted) and "expansive." Mothers who were black, younger, unmarried, less educated, and of lower socioeconomic status were more likely to have exclusive networks than expansive networks. Mothers with exclusive networks were more likely to be exposed to the norm of soft bedding (P = .002). Exposure to norms of non-supine infant placement, bedsharing, and soft bedding use within one's network was associated with engaging in these practices (P < .0001 for each). First-time mothers were more likely to pay attention to a non-supine norm and place infants in a non-supine position. Black mothers and first-time mothers were more likely to pay attention to the norm and use soft bedding.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the type of networks mothers have and the norms regarding infant sleep practices that circulate within these networks differed by race. Network norms were strongly associated with infant sleep practices and may partially explain the racial disparity therein.

Content of Infant Safe Sleep Counseling and Maternal Reported Practices in an Urban Clinic

OBJECTIVE

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome is a leading cause of mortality in infants, and pediatric providers can influence caregiver infant safe sleep practices. We described the content of safe sleep counseling by pediatric providers and examined pediatric provider and caregiver factors that may be related to the delivery of safe sleep counseling.

METHODS

A sample of mothers and providers enrolled in the Safe Start Study, a randomized controlled trial assessing a safe sleep intervention, were audio-recorded during the 2-week well child visits (WCV) at a large urban pediatric practice in Baltimore, Maryland from October 2015 to April 2017. Provider counseling content related to infant sleep was transcribed and coded based on American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) policy statement Grade A recommendations. Maternal reported infant sleep practices were defined by items on an interviewer administered survey. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to examine the relation between maternal reported infant sleep practices and provider counseling.

RESULTS

Most, 92%, of WCVs included at least 1 safe sleep topic, but there was inconsistency in content delivered based on AAP recommendations. Yet, only 12% of WCVs included all 4 components of ABC counseling. Maternal report of infant sleeping with a person or an object in sleep space was associated with decreased odds of receiving counseling on alone no person, no objects (adjusted odds ratio: 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.13, 0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric provider counseling on safe sleep is inconsistent across AAP recommendations demonstrating a need for enhanced provider education and a more standardized approach to assess infant sleep practices.

The EASE Project Revisited: Improving Safe Sleep Practices in Ohio Birthing and Children's Hospitals

Literature has shown hospitalized infants are not often observed in recommended safe sleep environments. Our objective was to implement a quality improvement program to improve compliance with appropriate safe sleep practices in both children's and birthing hospitals. Hospitalists from both settings were recruited to join an Ohio American Academy of Pediatrics collaborative to increase admitted infant safe sleep behaviors. Participants used a standardized tool to audit infants' sleep environments. Each site implemented 3 PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles to improve safe sleep behaviors. A total of 37.0% of infants in children's hospitals were observed to follow the current American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations at baseline; compliance improved to 59.6% at the project's end (P < .01). Compliance at birthing centers was 59.3% and increased to 72.5% (P < .01) at the collaborative's conclusion. This study demonstrates that a quality improvement program in different hospital settings can improve safe sleep practices. Infants in birthing centers were more commonly observed in appropriate sleep environments than infants in children's hospitals.

The association between baby care books that promote strict care routines and infant feeding, night-time care, and maternal-infant interactions

Baby care books that promote strict infant care routines are popular, but little research has considered their impact upon maternal infant care behaviours. We explored whether mothers who have read these books guide their infant care behaviours based on their concepts and how this is associated with infant feeding, night-time care, and response to infant's needs. Three hundred and fifty-four U.K. mothers with a baby aged 0-12 months completed an online questionnaire exploring use of baby care books, motivations for use, whether guidance was followed, and infant care behaviours. Mothers who read the books were drawn to them for information about how to settle their infant, infant sleep, and infant feeding behaviour. Those who read the books were less likely to breastfeed, feed responsively, have their infant sleep in the same room, cuddle their infant to sleep, or respond promptly to infant cries. Although the causality between reading these books and care cannot be determined through this study design, and is likely bidirectional with some reading the books to confirm existing preferences, around 25-40% of mothers noted the information determined their care decisions. Regardless of specific causal pathways, there is an association between these books and behaviours that go against infant feeding and responsive care recommendations. Understanding what drives mothers to follow these books and increasing support for new mothers in these areas is important. The findings will be important for those supporting mothers in the perinatal period in starting conversations around responsive infant care.

Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Safe Infant Sleep Recommendations in the Hospital Setting

OBJECTIVE

To identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of safe sleep recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics from the perspective of hospital staff as part of a needs assessment that was used to design a successful quality improvement intervention to change clinical practice.

DESIGN

Qualitative design.

SETTING

Multiple sites of three hospitals in the northeastern and southern United States.

PARTICIPANTS

We used purposeful sampling to identify 46 participants who cared for infants on inpatient hospital units (nurses and other staff members).

METHODS

A qualitative researcher used grounded theory to moderate the focus groups. We constructed the initial interview guide and then changed it as needed to capture more information about new ideas as they arose. Researchers from diverse backgrounds participated in the analysis and used the constant comparative method to select important concepts and to develop codes and subsequent themes. We continued to collect data until saturation was reached.

RESULTS

We identified themes and subthemes, and the taxonomy fit into the Grol and Wensing framework for change in clinical practice. The six primary themes included The Innovation Itself, The Individual Health Care Professional, The Patient, The Social Context, The Organizational Context, and The Economic and Political Context.

CONCLUSION

Participants described facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for safe infant sleep. Identification of these themes informed our quality improvement intervention to promote safe infant sleep. Findings can be used by others when faced with the need for similar change.

Nurses Leading Safe Infant Sleep Initiatives in the Hospital Setting

Every day, 10 otherwise healthy infants die from sleep-related deaths in the United States. These deaths, termed sudden unexpected infant death, remain the leading cause of post-neonatal death in the United States despite known modifiable risk factors and prevention recommendations. In birthing hospitals, many parents report being given incorrect and sometimes no information about infant sleep safety, which creates immediate and long-term safety concerns. In this article, we provide an overview of sudden unexpected infant death, including sudden unexpected postnatal collapse, and the latest safe sleep recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics. We also offer practical guidelines for nurses-those working at the bedside and those in leadership positions-who may be seeking to improve the quality of infant sleep practices in their organizations.

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Safe Sleep on Twitter: Analysis of Influences and Themes to Guide Health Promotion Efforts

BACKGROUND

In the United States, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is the leading cause of death in infants aged 1 month to 1 year. Approximately 3500 infants die from SIDS and sleep-related reasons on a yearly basis. Unintentional sleep-related deaths and bed sharing, a known risk factor for SIDS, are on the rise. Furthermore, ethnic disparities exist among those most affected by SIDS. Despite public health campaigns, infant mortality persists. Given the popularity of social media, understanding social media conversations around SIDS and safe sleep may assist the medical and public health communities with information needed to spread, reinforce, or counteract false information regarding SIDS and safe sleep.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to investigate the social media conversation around SIDS and safe sleep to understand the possible influences and guide health promotion efforts and public health research as well as enable health professionals to engage in directed communication regarding this topic.

METHODS

We used textual analytics to identify topics and extract meanings contained in unstructured textual data. Twitter messages were captured during September, October, and November in 2017. Tweets and retweets were collected using NUVI software in conjunction with Twitter's search API using the keywords: "sids," "infant death syndrome," "sudden infant death syndrome," and "safe sleep." This returned a total of 41,358 messages, which were analyzed using text mining and social media monitoring software.

RESULTS

Multiple themes were identified, including recommendations for safe sleep to prevent SIDS, safe sleep devices, the potential causes of SIDS, and how breastfeeding reduces SIDS. Compared with September and November, more personal and specific stories of infant loss were demonstrated in October (Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Month). The top influencers were news organizations, universities, and health-related organizations.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified valuable topics discussed and shared on Twitter regarding SIDS and safe sleep. The study results highlight the contradicting information a subset of the population is exposed to regarding SIDS and the continued controversy over vaccines. In addition, this analysis emphasizes the lack of public health organizations' presence on Twitter compared with the influence of universities and news media organizations. The results also demonstrate the prevalence of safe sleep products that are embedded in safe sleep messaging. These findings can assist providers in speaking about relevant topics when engaging in conversations about the prevention of SIDS and the promotion of safe sleep. Furthermore, public health agencies and advocates should utilize social media and Twitter to better communicate accurate health information as well as continue to combat the spread of false information.

Characteristics of Infant Deaths during Sleep While Under Nonparental Supervision

OBJECTIVE

To compare risk factors for infant sleep-related deaths under the supervision of parents and nonparents.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a secondary analysis of sleep-related infant deaths from 2004 to 2014 in the National Center for Fatality Review and Prevention Child Death Review Case Reporting System. The main exposure was supervisor at time of death. Primary outcomes included sleep position, location, and objects in the environment. Risk factors for parental vs nonparental supervisor were compared using χ² and multivariable logistic regression models. Risk factors associated with different nonparental supervisors were analyzed using χ².

RESULTS

Of the 10 490 deaths, 1375 (13.1%) occurred under nonparental supervision. Infants who died under nonparental supervision had higher adjusted odds of dying outside the home (OR 12.87, 95% CI 11.31-14.65), being placed prone (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.39-1.86) or on their side (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.12-1.62), or being found prone (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.50-2.02). Among infants who died under nonparental supervision, those supervised by relatives or friends were more often placed on an adult bed or couch for sleep and bed sharing (P < .0001), and to have objects in the sleep environment (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Infants who died of sleep-related causes under nonparental supervision were more likely to have been placed nonsupine. Among nonparental supervisors, relatives and friends were more likely to use unsafe sleep environments, such as locations other than a crib or bassinet and bed sharing. Pediatricians should educate parents that all caregivers must always follow safe sleep practices.

Barriers to and Interventions that Increase Nurses' and Parents' Compliance With Safe Sleep Recommendations for Preterm Infants

The purpose of this integrative review was to identify interventions that increase compliance of nurses and of parents with safe sleep recommendations for premature infants. Ten studies were included in the final sample, including three studies with a prospective descriptive design, five quality improvement initiatives with an interventional research design, one secondary analysis, and one retrospective medical chart review. Study samples included neonatal nurses and parents of premature infants in NICUs and transitional care nurseries in Massachusetts, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Sample sizes ranged from 5 to 259 NICU parents and 86 to 658 neonatal nurses. The categories of interventions we identified include identifying barriers to compliance, changing hospital policy, and providing safe sleep education for nurses and parents. We conclude that hospitals should have current, evidence-based safe sleep policies with clear transition guidelines for premature infants and that consistent and comprehensive nursing and parental education related to safe sleep should include current American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations and should address potential barriers to compliance.

Qualitative Assessment of Pregnant Women's Perceptions of Infant Sleep Boxes

Although several states have implemented programs providing boxes for infant sleep, safe sleep experts express concern regarding the paucity of safety and efficacy research on boxes. The purpose of this study was to assess pregnant women’s perceptions regarding use of baby sleep boxes. A convenience sample was recruited from a community prenatal education program. Twenty-eight women were administered a brief semistructured interview about their knowledge of baby sleep boxes, opinions about the boxes, and questions they would have. For most (n = 15, 54%), this was their first pregnancy. Participants self-identified as white (43%), black (36%), Hispanic (18%), and “other” (4%). Ten subthemes emerged related to previous knowledge of boxes (useful for families in need, historic precedent in other countries), positive attributes (portable, compact, affordable, decorative), and negative attributes (low to ground, structural integrity/design, stability, stigma). Research on safety and efficacy could reduce concerns, but issues of stigma may persist.

Parent-infant co-sleeping and the implications for sudden infant death syndrome

In 2015 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated its 2006 guideline to clarify the association between parent infant co-sleeping and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The practice of co-sleeping is a topic of continuing controversy and debate. Rather than highlighting the risks, the emphasis of the NICE guideline is to provide parents with balanced information so that they can make informed decisions about where their babies sleep. This contradicts previous public health messages on co-sleeping that discourages parents from the practice. Consequently, the updated national guideline has been criticised for failing to provide parents with safer sleep information, which has led to widespread confusion for parents and professionals. Health professionals can deliver safer sleep advice to support parents in their decision-making. However, as a result of inconsistent guidelines and evidence about parent-infant co-sleeping, health professionals may feel apprehensive and ill-equipped to provide advice and support. This article draws on a non-exhaustive literature review to discuss the risks and benefits of parent-infant co-sleeping, and the implications of this practice for SIDS. It also aims to provide transparency and improve understanding for health professionals so that they can support parents to adopt safer sleep strategies for their baby.

Randomized Trial of a Children's Book Versus Brochures for Safe Sleep Knowledge and Adherence in a High-Risk Population

OBJECTIVE

Sleep-related infant deaths have plateaued in the past decade, disproportionately affecting low socioeconomic status (SES) families. Printed materials are widely used for anticipatory guidance, yet none for safe sleep has been studied. We tested the efficacy of a specially designed children's book compared to brochures for safe sleep knowledge and adherence, which we hypothesized would be greater due to superior readability and engagement.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial involved low-SES mothers (n = 282) enrolled in a home visiting program. Home visitors (n = 56) were randomly assigned to perform safe sleep teaching and assessments during 3 visits: third trimester, 1 week old, and 2 months old, exclusively utilizing a specially designed children's book or brochures, and surveys incorporating the American Academy of Pediatrics' safe sleep recommendations. Outcomes were safe sleep knowledge, adherence, and usefulness of materials, controlling for maternal health literacy.

RESULTS

Safe sleep knowledge increased across all time points with no overall group difference, though gains for sleep-evocative and general health items varied. Odds of bed sharing were higher and exclusive crib use lower for the brochure group (P < .05). Mothers and home visitors reported similar usefulness, though home visitors reported greater dialogue via the book and mothers in the book group reported more book sharing with their baby.

CONCLUSIONS

While a specially designed children's book and brochures were equally effective conveying aggregate safe sleep knowledge in low-SES mothers, adherence to exclusive crib use and avoiding bed sharing were greater in the book group, attributable to enhanced dialogue, readability and emotional engagement. Children's books are a promising mode of anticipatory guidance, warranting further investigation.

Variation in Safe Sleep and Breastfeeding Practices Among Non-Hispanic Black Mothers in the United States According to Birth Country

OBJECTIVE

To examine variation in safe sleep and breastfeeding practices among US non-Hispanic black (NHB) mothers according to birth country.

METHODS

We analyzed NHB mothers who were surveyed regarding safe sleep and breastfeeding practices when their infants were 2 to 6 months of age in 2011 to 2014, as part of a larger national study. We examined prevalences of safe sleep and breastfeeding practices according to birth country and examined odds of adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics recommended safe sleep and breastfeeding practices in foreign-born NHB mothers, compared with US-born NHB mothers. Our multivariate models included adjustment for maternal age, education, income, and US geographic region, and infant age at the time of the survey.

RESULTS

Among 828 NHB mothers, 690 (83%) were US-born, 42 (5%) were African-born, 47 (6%) were Haitian-born, 24 (3%) were Jamaican-born, and 25 (3%) were born elsewhere. In the analysis of 803 US, African-, Haitian-, and Jamaican-born mothers, we found that Jamaican-born mothers had a lower rate of supine sleep compared with US-born mothers (40% vs 66%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.63). African-born mothers had lower rates of bedsharing compared with US-born mothers (11% vs 25% adjusted odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.46). Foreign-born mothers had higher rates of any and exclusive breastfeeding, compared with US-born mothers (85% and 40% vs 23% and 13%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Safe sleep and breastfeeding practices vary among US NHB mothers according to birth country. These data illustrate the importance of recognizing heterogeneity of safe sleep and breastfeeding practices within racial/ethnic groups.

Understanding the Risks Sitting and Carrying Devices Pose to Safe Infant Sleep

There have been various campaigns and recommendations to decrease the incidence of sudden unexpected infant death. Despite this, caregivers continue to place infants in unsafe sleeping environments. These environments, such as sitting devices, slings, carriers, and car seats, pose a significant risk to an infant's safety because of the risk from suffocation and cardiorespiratory instability. It is important for health care providers to understand the appropriate use of car seats, slings, and other sitting devices, to model appropriate behaviors, and to educate parents and caregivers. All parents, hospital staff, and other caregivers should understand the potential dangers associated with the inappropriate use of sitting devices for routine sleep.

Anticipatory guidance to prevent infant sleep problems within a randomised controlled trial: infant, maternal and partner outcomes at 6 months of age

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of sleep education delivered antenatally and at 3 weeks postpartum to prevent infant sleep problems at 6 months of age.

DESIGN

Sleep intervention within a randomised controlled trial for the Prevention of Overweight in Infancy (POI) study.

PARTICIPANTS

802 families were randomly allocated to one of four groups: usual care (control), sleep intervention (sleep), food, activity and breastfeeding intervention (FAB), and combined group receiving both interventions (combination).

INTERVENTIONS

All groups received standard Well Child care. The sleep intervention groups (sleep and combination) received an antenatal group education session (all mothers and most partners) emphasising infant self-settling and safe sleeping, and a home visit at 3 weeks reinforcing the antenatal sleep education. FAB and combination groups received four contacts providing education and support on breast feeding, food and activity up to 4 months postpartum.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Here we report secondary sleep outcomes from the POI study: the prevalence of parent-reported infant sleep problems and night waking, and differences in sleep duration. Additional outcomes reported include differences in infant self-settling, safe sleep practices, and maternal and partner reports of their own sleep, fatigue and depression symptoms.

RESULTS

Linear or mixed linear regression models found no significant intervention effects on sleep outcomes, with 19.1% of mothers and 16.6% of partners reporting their infant's sleep a problem at 6 months. Actigraphy estimated the number of night wakings to be significantly reduced (8%) and the duration of daytime sleep increased (6 min) in those groups receiving the sleep intervention compared with those who did not. However, these small differences were not clinically significant and not observed in 24 hours infant sleep diary data. No other differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

A strategy delivering infant sleep education antenatally and at 3 weeks postpartum was not effective in preventing the development of parent-reported infant sleep problems.

Comparison of Text Messages Versus E-mail When Communicating and Querying With Mothers About Safe Infant Sleep

OBJECTIVE

To assess how mothers' choice of e-mail or text messages (SMS) to receive safe sleep communications is associated with educational video viewing and responses to care practice queries.

METHODS

Seven hundred ninety-two new mothers received safe sleep-related communications for 60 days after newborn hospital discharge as part of a trial of health education interventions on infant care practices. Mothers chose e-mail or SMS for study communications and were sent 22 short safe sleep videos and 41 queries regarding infant care practices.

RESULTS

Study communications via e-mail were elected by 55.7% of participants. The SMS group had a modestly higher overall view rate of videos (59.1% vs 54.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.81) and a substantially higher response rate to queries (70.0% vs 45.2%; aOR, 3.48; 95% CI, 2.74-4.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants more commonly opted to receive infant care practice videos and queries via e-mail. SMS was associated with higher viewing and response rates, especially for query responses. These results highlight the importance of understanding how specific modalities of communication might vary in reach.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Risk for Sudden Unexpected Infant Death in Children of Adolescent Mothers: A Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate practices, knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding infant sleep among adolescent mothers, a demographic at high risk for sudden unexpected infant death, and to identify novel public health interventions targeting the particular reasons of this population.

STUDY DESIGN

Seven targeted focus groups including 43 adolescent mothers were conducted at high school daycare centers throughout Colorado. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, validated, and then analyzed in NVivo 10. Validation included coding consistency statistics and expert review.

RESULTS

Most mothers knew many of the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for infant sleep. However, almost all teens reported bedsharing regularly and used loose blankets or soft bedding despite being informed of risks. Reasons for nonadherence to recommendations included beliefs that babies are safest and sleep more/better in bed with them, that bedsharing is a bonding opportunity, and that bedsharing is easier than using a separate sleep space. The most common justifications for blankets were infant comfort and concern that babies were cold. Participants' decision making was often influenced by their own mothers, with whom they often resided. Participants felt that their instincts trumped professional advice, even when in direct contradiction to safe sleep recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Among focus group participants, adherence with safe sleep practices was poor despite awareness of the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations. Many mothers expressed beliefs and instincts that infants were safe in various unsafe sleep environments. Future study should investigate the efficacy of alternative educational strategies, including education of grandmothers, who have significant influence over adolescent mothers.

Safe sleep for pediatric inpatients

PURPOSE

To improve sleep environment safety for inpatient infants.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This quality improvement project involved assessment of sleep environment safety for inpatient infants before and after a bundled intervention of staff education and introduction of swaddle sacks and bedside storage bins.

RESULTS

The proportion of infant cribs without loose objects in them increased (32-72%, p = .025), and safe sleep positioning remained stable (82% vs. 95%, p = .183).

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Staff education, swaddle sleep sacks, and bedside storage containers were associated with improved sleep safety among pediatric inpatients at our institution and may help at other institutions.

A Comparison of Community and Clinic Baby Showers to Promote Safe Sleep for Populations at High Risk for Infant Mortality

Community baby showers have provided education and free portable cribs to promote safe sleep for high-risk infants. We evaluated knowledge gained at these showers and the effectiveness of holding baby showers at a primary care clinic as an alternative to traditional community venues. Participants at the community venue were more likely to exhibit risk factors associated with unsafe sleep and to report an unsafe sleep location for their infant without the provided portable crib. Following the showers, both groups showed improvement in knowledge and intentions regarding safe sleep. However, to connect with the highest risk groups, showers held at community venues appeared to be preferable to those held at high-risk clinics.

Unintentional home injuries across the life span: problems and solutions

Home injuries cause more than 30,000 deaths and 12 million nonfatal injuries annually in the United States. They generate an estimated $222 billion in lifetime costs annually. Despite some data limitations in documenting home as the location of an injury, much progress has been made in identifying effective prevention strategies that reduce injury or mitigate risk behaviors. The current interest in public health in the role of housing in health offers unparalleled opportunities for injury prevention professionals concerned with home injuries. Sharing the science of injury prevention with the wide array of professionals-such as architects, home builders, home visitors, and fire and emergency medical services providers-who create home environments and interact with residents could be a useful approach. A collaborative national effort to reduce the burden of home injuries is needed.

Trends in infant bedding use: National Infant Sleep Position study, 1993-2010

BACKGROUND

Use of potentially hazardous bedding, as defined by the American Academy of Pediatrics (eg, pillows, quilts, comforters, loose bedding), is a modifiable risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome and unintentional sleep-related suffocation. The proportion of US infants sleeping with these types of bedding is unknown.

METHODS

To investigate the US prevalence of and trends in bedding use, we analyzed 1993-2010 data from the National Infant Sleep Position study. Infants reported as being usually placed to sleep with blankets, quilts, pillows, and other similar materials under or covering them in the last 2 weeks were classified as bedding users. Logistic regression was used to describe characteristics associated with bedding use.

RESULTS

From 1993 to 2010, bedding use declined but remained a widespread practice (moving average of 85.9% in 1993-1995 to 54.7% in 2008-2010). Prevalence was highest for infants of teen-aged mothers (83.5%) and lowest for infants born at term (55.6%). Bedding use was also frequently reported among infants sleeping in adult beds, on their sides, and on a shared surface. The rate of decline in bedding use was markedly less from 2001-2010 compared with 1993-2000. For 2007 to 2010, the strongest predictors (adjusted odds ratio: ≥1.5) of bedding use were young maternal age, non-white race and ethnicity, and not being college educated.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedding use for infant sleep remains common despite recommendations against this practice. Understanding trends in bedding use is important for tailoring safe sleep interventions.

Exploring caregiver behavior and knowledge about unsafe sleep surfaces in infant injury death cases

OBJECTIVES

In the United States, infant deaths due to sleep-related injuries have quadrupled over the past two decades. One of the major risk factors is the placement of an infant to sleep on a surface other than a crib or bassinet. This study examines contextual circumstances and knowledge and behaviors that may contribute to the placement of infants on an unsafe sleep surface in infant injury death cases.

METHOD

This study employed a retrospective review of 255 sleep-related injury death cases in New York City from 2004 to 2010 where an infant was found sleeping on an unsafe sleep surface. Mixed-methods analyses, employing both quantitative analysis of vital statistics data and risk variables extracted from the medical examiner files and qualitative analysis of the narrative content of the files, were conducted.

RESULTS

In 48% of cases, a crib or bassinet was identified in the home. Quantitative analysis revealed no significant differences in demographic or risk factor characteristics between infants who had a crib or bassinet and those who did not. Qualitative analysis highlighted factors in caregivers' decision making related to situational convenience, preference, and misconceptions concerning safe infant sleep. The health belief model (HBM), specifically the constructs of perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, and barriers, was used as a lens to understand factors associated with caregiver behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that infants are at risk of sleep-related injury death even when a crib or bassinet is present. Understanding the factors that may influence safe sleep behaviors can help produce more appropriate interventions.

Improving safe sleep environments for well newborns in the hospital setting

OBJECTIVE

Following the "Back to Sleep" campaign, deaths from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) were reduced. However, SIDS and sleep-related deaths continue to occur. Studies demonstrate that modeling by health care workers influences parents to place infants supine for sleep. Recently, additional emphasis has been placed on environment. The purpose of this study was to improve sleep position and environment in the hospital.

METHODS

A Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle was initiated. Sleeping infants were observed at baseline. A bundled intervention was implemented; infants were again observed. Parents were surveyed.

RESULTS

At baseline, 25% (36/144) of sleeping infants were safe; the majority of unsafe sleep was a result of environment. Postintervention, significantly more (58%; 145/249) had safe sleep (P < .0001). Most parents planned to use the supine position (95%; 96/101); none planned to cosleep. Many intended to adjust their infants' home sleep environment.

CONCLUSION

Using a multifaceted approach significantly improved infant safe sleep practice in the hospital setting.