Geographic variation in sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use in people with type 2 diabetes in New South Wales, Australia

AIM

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) improve glycaemic control and cardio-renal outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, geographic and socio-economic variation in use is not well understood.

METHODS

We identified 367 829 New South Wales residents aged ≥40 years who dispensed metformin in 2020 as a proxy for T2D. We estimated the prevalence of use of other glucose-lowering medicines among people with T2D and the prevalence of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA use among people using concomitant T2D therapy (i.e. metformin + another glucose-lowering medicine). We measured the prevalence by small-level geography, stratified by age group, and characterized by remoteness and socio-economic status.

RESULTS

The prevalence of SGLT2i (29.7%) and GLP-1RA (8.3%) use in people with T2D aged 40-64 increased with geographic remoteness and in areas of greater socio-economic disadvantage, similar to other glucose-lowering medicines. The prevalence of SGLT2i (55.4%) and GLP-1RA (15.4%) among people using concomitant T2D therapy varied across geographic areas, with lower SGLT2i use in more disadvantaged areas and localized areas of high GLP-1RA use (2.5 times the median). Compared with people aged 40-64 years, the prevalence of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA use was lower in older age groups, but with similar patterns of variation across geographic areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA use varied by geography, probably reflecting a combination of system- and prescriber-level factors. Socio-economic variation in GLP-1RA use was overshadowed by localized patterns of prescribing. Continued monitoring of variation can help shape interventions to optimize use among people who would benefit the most.

Combination of retagliptin and henagliflozin as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial

AIM

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of co-administering retagliptin and henagliflozin versus individual agents at corresponding doses in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were inadequately controlled with metformin.

METHODS

This multicentre, phase 3 trial consisted of a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled period. Patients with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels between 7.5% and 10.5% were randomized to receive once-daily retagliptin 100 mg (R100; n = 155), henagliflozin 5 mg (H5; n = 156), henagliflozin 10 mg (H10; n = 156), co-administered R100/H5 (n = 155), or R100/H10 (n = 156). The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

Based on the primary estimand, the least squares mean reductions in HbA1c at week 24 were significantly greater in the R100/H5 (-1.51%) and R100/H10 (-1.54%) groups compared with those receiving the corresponding doses of individual agents (-0.98% for R100, -0.86% for H5 and -0.95% for H10, respectively; p < .0001 for all pairwise comparisons). Achievement of HbA1c <7.0% at week 24 was observed in 27.1% of patients in the R100 group, 21.2% in the H5 group, 24.4% in the H10 group, 57.4% in the R100/H5 group and 56.4% in the R100/H10 group. Reductions in fasting plasma glucose and 2-h postprandial glucose were also more pronounced in the co-administration groups compared with the individual agents at corresponding doses. Decreases in body weight and systolic blood pressure were greater in the groups containing henagliflozin than in the R100 group. The incidence rates of adverse events were similar across all treatment groups, with no reported episodes of severe hypoglycaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy, the co-administration of retagliptin and henagliflozin yielded more effective glycaemic control through 24 weeks compared with the individual agents at their corresponding doses.

Pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia in a patient with Cushing's disease: Potential use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist for treatment

Pasireotide improves hypercortisolemia and induces hyperglycemia via somatostatin receptor type-5 stimulation. GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor potentially help regulate hyperglycemia in patients with Cushing's disease, especially after pasireotide administration.

Effect of Luseogliflozin on Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Effects of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on reducing hospitalization for heart failure have been reported in randomized controlled trials, but their effects on patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the drug efficacy of luseogliflozin, a sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and HFpEF.

Methods and Results

We performed a multicenter, open‐label, randomized, controlled trial for comparing luseogliflozin 2.5 mg once daily with voglibose 0.2 mg 3 times daily in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus suffering from HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction >45% and BNP [B‐type natriuretic peptide] concentrations ≥35 pg/mL) in a 1:1 randomization fashion. The primary outcome was the difference from baseline in BNP levels after 12 weeks of treatment between the 2 drugs. A total of 173 patients with diabetes mellitus and HFpEF were included. Of these, 83 patients were assigned to receive luseogliflozin and 82 to receive voglibose. There was no significant difference in the reduction in BNP concentrations after 12 weeks from baseline between the 2 groups. The ratio of the mean BNP value at week 12 to the baseline value was 0.79 in the luseogliflozin group and 0.87 in the voglibose group (percent change, −9.0% versus −1.9%; ratio of change with luseogliflozin versus voglibose, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78–1.10; P=0.26).

Conclusion

In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and HFpEF, there is no significant difference in the degree of reduction in BNP concentrations after 12 weeks between luseogliflozin and voglibose.

Registration

URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm; Unique identifier: UMIN000018395.

Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis due to a strict low-carbohydrate diet during treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors

Background

Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis is a critical clinical presentation that can occur during treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. However, little is known regarding how a low-carbohydrate diet in combination with this treatment can increase the risk for this condition. Here, we report a case of euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors after initiation of a low-carbohydrate diet.

Case Presentation

A 54-year-old woman who was taking canagliflozin was transferred to our hospital with severe dyspnea. She had been started on a strict low-carbohydrate diet for 6 days before admission. Laboratory evaluation revealed severe ketoacidosis and a blood glucose level of 196 mg/dL. After her symptoms improved, she was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Conclusion

Although low-carbohydrate diets are recommended for patients with diabetes mellitus, physicians should exercise great caution in recommending low-carbohydrate diets to patients undergoing treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor plus pioglitazone vs pioglitazone alone in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors plus pioglitazone versus pioglitazone alone in type 2 diabetic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic literature searches were performed across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov from 1966 to September 2018 to identify randomized, controlled trials. Mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) was used to evaluate efficacy and safety end-points (active group vs control group), wherever appropriate. Heterogeneity was assessed by P value of χ2 statistics and I 2.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials with 1411 diabetic patients were included. Pooling data from included trials showed that HbA1c change was significantly larger in both low-dose SGLT-2 inhibitors (MD: -0.59%, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.41%) and high-dose SGLT-2 inhibitors (MD: -0.65%, 95% CI: -0.78 to -0.53%) plus pioglitazone than pioglitazone alone in 24-26 weeks. Favourable outcomes were also found in fasting blood glucose level reduction and more patients achieving HbA1c <7% in SGLT-2 inhibitor plus pioglitazone (OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.99 to 5.16). Also, SGLT-2 inhibitor plus pioglitazone vs pioglitazone, reduced weight and blood pressure. The risks of death, heart failure, hypoglycaemia and urinary tract infection were not different between active and control groups although genital tract infection was more frequently seen in SGLT-2 inhibitor group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to pioglitazone alone, SGLT-2 inhibitor plus pioglitazone improved glycaemic control, reduced body weight and lowered blood pressure, but increased genital tract infection.

Bioequivalence of saxagliptin/dapagliflozin fixed-dose combination tablets compared with coadministration of the individual tablets to healthy subjects

Saxagliptin and dapagliflozin are individually indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The bioequivalence of saxagliptin/dapagliflozin 2.5/5 mg and 5/10 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets compared with coadministration of the individual tablets and the food effect on both strengths of saxagliptin/dapagliflozin FDCs were evaluated in this open-label, randomized, single-dose crossover study. Healthy subjects were randomized to saxagliptin 2.5 mg + dapagliflozin 5 mg fasted, 2.5/5 mg FDC fasted, 2.5/5 mg FDC fed (Cohort 1) or saxagliptin 5 mg + dapagliflozin 10 mg fasted, 5/10 mg FDC fasted, 5/10 mg FDC fed (Cohort 2). Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetics of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin were obtained predose and up to 60 h postdose. Bioequivalence of FDC tablets versus individual components was concluded if the 90% CIs for FDC to individual component geometric mean ratios of C max, AUC 0-T, and AUC inf of both analytes were between 0.80 and 1.25. Seventy-two subjects were randomized; 71 (98.6%) completed the study. Saxagliptin/dapagliflozin 2.5/5 mg and 5/10 mg FDC tablets were bioequivalent to the individual tablets administered concomitantly. Food had no clinically meaningful effect on saxagliptin or dapagliflozin overall systemic exposure. Saxagliptin/dapagliflozin FDC tablets were bioequivalent to coadministration of the individual components in healthy subjects under fasted conditions and food had no clinically meaningful effect on bioavailability.