A Comparative Analysis of Prophylactic Antibiotic Administration in Emergency Surgery Versus Elective Surgery: A Comprehensive Review

Surgical site infections (SSIs) contribute to increased patient morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and substantial healthcare costs. Prophylactic antibiotics play a pivotal role in mitigating the risk of SSIs, with their administration being a standard practice before both emergency and elective surgeries. This paper provides a comprehensive review and comparative analysis of the benefits of prophylactic antibiotic administration in emergency surgery versus elective surgery. Through a systematic literature review and analysis of relevant studies identified through PubMed searches, this paper highlights the specific benefits of prophylactic antibiotics between emergency and elective surgeries. The findings underscore the importance of tailored antibiotic regimens and administration protocols to optimize patient care and promote successful surgical outcomes in diverse clinical settings. Further research is warranted to refine guidelines and enhance understanding of the relationship between prophylactic antibiotics and surgical outcomes across different surgical contexts.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using the No-Touch Great Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting Technique: A Retrospective Study

Background We focused on coronary artery bypass grafting using the great saphenous vein and compared the no-touch great saphenous vein and conventional great saphenous vein. Methods Coronary artery bypass grafting using the great saphenous vein was performed at our hospital over a 15-year period from 2007/04 to 2022/08. The primary endpoint was the patency of the great saphenous vein at discharge, and secondary endpoints were delayed healing of the great saphenous vein harvest wound, delayed healing of the mid-thoracic wound, and factors related to coronary artery bypass surgery. Results There were 183 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery using the great saphenous vein during the study period. There were 131 male patients (72%) and 52 female patients (28%) with a mean age of 69 years (38-94 years). The method of harvesting the great saphenous vein was a no-touch great saphenous vein graft (NT-SVG) in 29 cases (16%) and conventional SVG in 154 cases (84%). Patients were divided into two groups: the NT-SVG group and the standard-collection saphenous vein graft (SVG) group. We compared graft patency at discharge, healing failure of the lower leg wound, healing failure of the mid-thoracic wound, and flow by transit-time flow measurement (TTFM). Conclusion There were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes between the NT-SVG and conventional SVG groups in this study.

Introduction of a New Protocol to Limit the Number of Cancelled Elective Orthopaedic Operations Due to Asymptomatic Bacteriuria

Background Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) poses a significant diagnostic dilemma for medical professionals. Current hospital screening protocol determines the likelihood of a positive diagnosis of a urinary tract infection (UTI) based on the results of a bedside urinalysis. ASB, defined as a positive urine culture in the absence of symptoms, can contribute to unnecessary cancellations, poor utilisation of theatre time, and delayed patient care. We present a two-cycle audit proposing a new pathway to addressing ASB in patients awaiting elective orthopaedic surgery, aiming to optimise surgical yield. Our objectives are to identify areas for improvement in our departmental practices with respect to asymptomatic bacteria compared to the published literature. We propose a new protocol targeted to improve our current practices to minimise patient cancellations and optimise theatre utilisation. Methodology A total of 78 patients who had an elective orthopaedic procedure cancelled at a large district general hospital offering tertiary orthopaedic services, between two study periods spanning March 2018 to April 2019 and May 2019 to March 2020, were identified from electronic hospital records and theatre management systems. Demographics, procedure details, and reasons for cancellations, including the result of urinalysis and the presence of UTI symptoms were assessed. Our pathway was introduced after the first study period and, subsequently, re-audited to assess adherence to the new protocol and its effect on cancellations. Results We identified 78 patients, with a 50:50 male:female split and an average age of 63 (range = 9-90). Of the 33 patients in the first cohort, seven (21.2%) were cancelled due to UTI risk based on positive urinalysis. Of these seven cancellations, one (14.3%) patient reported symptoms of a UTI. The second cohort comprised 45 patients, two (4.4%) of whom were cancelled due to UTI risk based on symptom questionnaire results. These two symptomatic patients along with another two asymptomatic patients (8.8% in total) were found to have positive urinalyses; however, the two asymptomatic patients had their operations cancelled for unrelated reasons. Conclusions The study has shown that previously of all patients awaiting elective orthopaedic operations who had their procedures cancelled, 85.7% were cancelled due to ASB. After the introduction of a new protocol focussing on symptoms rather than urinalysis, we estimate that the number of cancelled elective orthopaedic operations has reduced by 71.4%, thereby greatly improving the utilisation of theatre time.

National variation in prophylactic antibiotic use for elective primary total joint replacement

Aims

Prophylactic antibiotic regimens for elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty vary widely across hospitals and trusts in the UK. This study aimed to identify antibiotic prophylaxis regimens currently in use for elective primary arthroplasty across the UK, establish variations in antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and their impact on the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the first-year post-index procedure, and evaluate adherence to current international consensus guidance.

Methods

The guidelines for the primary and alternative recommended prophylactic antibiotic regimens in clean orthopaedic surgery (primary arthroplasty) for 109 hospitals and trusts across the UK were sought by searching each trust and hospital's website (intranet webpages), and by using the MicroGuide app. The mean cost of each antibiotic regimen was calculated using price data from the British National Formulary (BNF). Regimens were then compared to the 2018 Philadelphia Consensus Guidance, to evaluate adherence to international guidance.

Results

The primary choice and dosing of the prophylactic antimicrobial regimens varied widely. The two most used regimens were combined teicoplanin and gentamicin, and cefuroxime followed by two or three doses of cefuroxime eight-hourly, recommended by 24 centres (22.02%) each. The alternative choice and dosing of the prophylactic antimicrobial regimen also varied widely across the 83 centres with data available. Prophylaxis regimens across some centres fail to cover the likeliest causes of surgical site infection (SSI). Five centres (4.59%) recommend co-amoxiclav, which confers no Staphylococcus coverage, while 33 centres (30.28%) recommend cefuroxime, which confers no Enterococcus coverage. Limited adherence to 2018 Philadelphia Consensus Guidance was observed, with 67 centres (61.50%) not including a cephalosporin in their guidance.

Conclusion

This analysis of guidance on antimicrobial prophylaxis in primary arthroplasty across 109 hospitals and trusts in the UK has identified widespread variation in primary and alternative antimicrobial regimens currently recommended.

Risk Factors for Post-appendectomy Surgical Site Infection in Laparoscopy and Laparotomy - Retrospective Cohort Study

Background Appendicitis is a frequent emergency condition. Surgical site infections (SSI) are a common complication of appendectomy. Despite improvements in infection control, SSIs continue to cause harm, prolonged hospital stays, and even death. Objective The objective of this study is to compare the risk of developing surgical site infections (SSIs) between open laparotomy and laparoscopic appendectomies in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia. Methods This retrospective cohort study compared laparotomy and laparoscopy for post-operative surgical site infection among patients who underwent an appendectomy at King Fahad Hospital (KFH) in Albaha, Saudi Arabia. Medical record numbers (MRNs) of patients who met the inclusion criteria were collected to build the sampling frame. From the final sampling frame, simple random sampling using a random number generator was used to draw a representative sample. Data were collected from the surgical health records of the patients. The collected data included patients' demographics, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, ordered imaging studies, pre-operative shaving, type and duration of surgery, intraoperative findings, and signs of wound inflammation. Results The total number of patients included in the analysis was 256, who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis. Among those who underwent laparoscopy, 5.7% had to be converted to open laparotomy. Signs of surgical wound inflammation were found in 10.2% of the patients. Patients who underwent open laparotomy had a significantly higher risk of wound infection (RR=3.1, p-value=0.001). Further analysis revealed an effect modification of pre-operative shaving. Open laparotomy has a higher risk of wound infection among patients who have not had pre-operative shaving (RR=4.1 vs. RR=2.6), while both risks were statistically significant (p-value=0.033 and p-value=0.035), respectively. Complicated cases in intra-operative findings were found to have a higher risk of post-appendectomy SSI. Conclusion This study demonstrates that laparoscopic appendectomy carries a lower risk of surgical site infection (SSI) compared to open laparotomy. Additionally, pre-operative shaving of the surgical site was found to increase the incidence of SSI. Healthcare providers can use this information to enhance their practice and reduce the occurrence of surgical site infections. Whenever possible, laparoscopic appendectomy should be preferred over open laparotomy due to its substantially lower SSI risk. We also recommend vigilant monitoring of complicated appendectomy, particularly in cases of ruptured appendicitis, for signs of SSI.

Surgical Site Bacterial Infection in a General Hospital, Al-Jouf Region, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study

Background Surgical site infection (SSI) is a major healthcare problem with a great impact on patient morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost all over the world. It accounts for 20% of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), with higher frequency in low- and middle-income countries where it affects about 30% of the patients undergoing surgery. Aim The current study aims to assess the prevalence of SSI in a general hospital in Sakaka, Al-Jouf region, Saudi Arabia. The types of bacteria causing SSI were also determined. Subjects and methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was done by reviewing the hospital records of patients who got SSI during the period between 2020 and 2022. Data collection was done during 2022 and 2023 after taking ethical approval and permission from the hospital management. Results The number of patients who underwent surgical procedures during 2020, 2021, and 2022 were 689, 867, and 1119, respectively. Most of the cases were cholecystectomy and appendectomy. The cases that developed surgical site infection after cholecystectomy and/or appendectomy during 2021 and 2022 were 15.45% and 9.29% cases, respectively, and they were mainly associated with appendectomy. A culture and sensitivity test revealed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Klebsiella pneumonia. Nearly all patients have received ciprofloxacin for seven days and improved with treatment. Conclusion The number of cases that developed SSI has decreased gradually due to the application of infection control measures and strict follow-up.

A Practical Approach to Predicting Surgical Site Infection Risk Among Patients Before Leaving the Operating Room

A surgical site infection (SSI) prediction model that identifies at-risk patients before leaving the operating room can support efforts to improve patient safety. In this study, eight pre-operative and five perioperative patient- and procedure-specific characteristics were tested with two scoring algorithms: 1) count of positive factors (manual), and 2) logistic regression model (automated). Models were developed and validated using data from 3,440 general and oncologic surgical patients. In the automated algorithm, two pre-operative (procedure urgency, odds ratio [OR]: 1.7; and antibiotic administration >2 hours before incision, OR: 1.6) and three intraoperative risk factors (open surgery [OR: 3.7], high-risk procedure [OR: 3.5], and operative time OR: [2.6]) were associated with SSI risk. The manual score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.831 and the automated algorithm achieved AUC of 0.868. Open surgery had the greatest impact on prediction, followed by procedure risk, operative time, and procedure urgency. At 80% sensitivity, the manual and automated scores achieved a positive predictive value of 16.3% and 22.0%, respectively. Both the manual and automated SSI risk prediction algorithms accurately identified at-risk populations. Use of either model before the patient leaves the operating room can provide the clinical team with evidence-based guidance to consider proactive intervention to prevent SSIs.

The Duration of Postoperative Antibiotics in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although prophylactic antibiotic use following autologous breast reconstruction post-mastectomy is a common practice, there is no consensus in the literature regarding its duration. Antibiotic stewardship is important to minimise multi-resistant organisms as well as mitigate the associated side effects. Currently, there are no published guidelines regarding the duration of prophylactic antibiotics in autologous breast reconstruction surgery following mastectomy. The authors searched the online literature regarding the administration of antibiotics for autologous breast reconstruction surgery post-mastectomy. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs). Three studies met the inclusion criteria and included a total of 1,400 patients. Overall, 101 (7.2%) SSIs were observed. There was no significant difference in the rate of SSIs when comparing the use of antibiotics for less than or longer than 24 hours postoperatively (odds ratio = 1.434, p = 0.124). There is no significant difference between SSIs with the use of antibiotics for longer than 24 hours when compared to less than 24 hours. Further studies in the form of randomised controlled trials are required to assess the effects of prophylactic antibiotic duration in autologous breast reconstruction following mastectomy.

Surgical Marking Pen Contamination: Writing a Postoperative Infection Into Your Preoperative Plan

Introduction Preoperative marking is an essential safety practice to prevent "never" events, including wrong site surgery. Moreover, the Joint Commission regulations of the Universal Protocol require that patients be marked to indicate the operative site. Marking typically occurs with a pen or marker, which may be disposable or reusable. Previous studies have demonstrated that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can survive in the dark, moist, capped environment of the marking pen and thus could plausibly be a nidus for transmission from patient to patient. The Joint Commission has established no increased risk of postoperative infection with these markings. With this study, we aimed to determine the colonization of surgical marking pens in the plastic surgery population. Methods Two marking pens from five different attending plastic surgeons at a single institution were cultured in standard fashion for aerobic and anaerobic growth. All pens were used repeatedly in office settings for performing patient markings. Those same ten marking pens were then used to mark incision sites on mock patients. Standard povidone-iodine prepping was then performed in a paint-only fashion over the skin markings, and cultures were again taken. A control group consisted of cultures from five sterile pens from the operating room. Each sterile pen was opened, uncapped, and then swabbed. All twenty-five cultures were analyzed in the hospital laboratory in a blinded fashion. Results The five control pens revealed no bacterial growth. Of the 10 direct pen cultures, two samples grew coagulase-negative staphylococci and one culture contained Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The 10-patient marked and prepped specimens showed eight negative cultures and two with coagulase-negative staphylococci. Although Pseudomonas was detected on standard pen culture, no pseudomonal growth was present in any of the samples after patient marking and prepping with povidone-iodine. Conclusions Our findings reaffirm that marking pens may be vehicles for bacterial transmission and expand upon previous studies by describing the presence of bacterial colonization on marking pens even after surgical site preparation with povidone-iodine.

Preoperative Serum Albumin Level as a Predictor of Abdominal Wound-Related Complications After Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy

Background Serum albumin is generally considered to be a predictor of patients' nutritional status. Previous studies have used serum albumin to assess postoperative morbidity, mortality, and various other surgical outcomes in cardiac surgeries and elective gastrointestinal surgeries. In this study, we used preoperative serum albumin levels to assess postoperative surgical site wound complications in patients who underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy. Methodology Preoperative serum albumin level was observed in 60 patients who underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy due to various pathological conditions and were divided into those with hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin level <3.5 g/dl and >3.5 g/dL). Postoperative surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, and various complications, such as duration of hospital stay, prolonged ileus, the incidence of enterocutaneous fistula, the incidence of anastomotic leak, and 30-day mortality, were assessed. Results In our study, about 65% of the patients had hypoalbuminemia. Among them, 56.4% of the patients had surgical site infections according to the Southampton grade, with a statistically significant p-value of <0.001. Moreover, 87.2% of the patients had wound dehiscence according to the World Union Wound Healing Societies Surgical Wound Dehiscence wound grading, with a statistically significant p-value of <0.001. In addition, statistical significance was noted between preoperative hypoalbuminemia and increased postoperative hospital stay, with a p-value of <0.001. Conclusions Preoperative serum albumin value is a formidable predictor of postoperative surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, and duration of hospital stay in patients who underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy.