Patient Satisfaction and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Adolescent Sub-inguinal Microscopic Varicocelectomy

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The long-term outcomes of varicocelectomy in adolescents is debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate symptom improvement, hypogonadism, and paternity in those who underwent adolescent sub-inguinal microscopic varicocelectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was done of adolescents (median=19, interquartile range (IQR)=16-19.75 years) who underwent microscopic varicocelectomy between 2011 and 2021. Demographics, surgical indications, and outcomes were collected, as well as pre- and postoperative hormone levels and semen parameters. A questionnaire was prospectively collected to evaluate orchialgia, paternity, and symptoms of hypogonadism. Descriptive statistics and t-tests were performed, with significance assessed at p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 46 adolescents were included. Age at the time of diagnosis and surgery was 19 (IQR=16-20) and 19 (IQR= 18-21) years, respectively. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and total testosterone were not affected after surgery. Similarly, semen parameters were preserved after varicocelectomy, with median concentration increasing from 12x106/ml to 16x106/ml but not reaching significance (p=0.272). A total of 26 men completed the questionnaire. The age of responders was 22 (IQR=21-24) years, and the time after having had the varicocelectomy was 36.5 (IQR= 18.25-62.25) months. Orchialgia persisted in five men, and three reported having a recurrence. Two men, who had a preoperative abnormal semen analysis, were actively trying to have children and reported successfully having achieved natural pregnancies. None of the patients reported having hypogonadism, and none were receiving testosterone therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that microscopic varicocelectomy in adolescents appears to be a safe and feasible procedure with a low rate of syndrome recurrence and no association with symptoms or biochemical evidence of hypogonadism.

Denial and oncological pathology: Case report of a massive testicular cancer

LITERATURE

The cancer of testicles represents 1% of male neoplasms and 5% of urological malignant neoplasm. Its incidence has been growing in Western societies. Cancer of testicles usually presents as an increase of consistence in one testicles and absence of pain, as a casual ultrasound scan finding, or it could be highlighted by a scrotal injury. The surgical treatment is either radical orchiectomy or radical orchiectomy plus retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

CASE PRESENTATION

The case presented concerns a 48-year-old male with a history of left testicular trauma and subsequent hypotrophy. Over the next 4 years, the patient developed a testicle size increase up to 15 cm in diameter. At diagnosis, he had retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. The patient was, after surgery, referred to the oncology department.

CONCLUSION

The awareness of the male population respect to testicular cancer and its screening methods (e.g. self-examination) is essential to make the diagnosis at an early stage. It is also essential to psychologically support patients undergoing surgical and/or pharmacological therapy due to risk of determining anxiety or depression compared to the whole population.

Effects of percutaneous varicocele repair on testicular volume: results from a 12-month follow-up

Varicocele is a common finding in men. Varicocele correction has been advocated for young patients with testicular hypotrophy, but there is a lack of morphofunctional follow-up data. We assessed whether percutaneous treatment of left varicocele is associated with testicular "catch-up growth" in the following 12 months by retrospectively reviewing data from an electronic database of 10 656 patients followed up in our clinic between 2006 and 2016. We selected all young adults (<35 years) with left varicocele who underwent percutaneous treatment, had a minimum of 12 months' ultrasound imaging follow-up, and had no other conditions affecting testicular volume. One hundred and fourteen men (mean±standard deviation [s.d.] of age: 22.8 ± 5.4 years) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Left testicular hypotrophy (LTH), defined as a ≥20% difference between left and right testicular volume at baseline, was observed in 26 (22.8%) men. Participants with LTH (mean±s.d.: 14.5 ± 2.7 ml) had lower baseline testicular volume compared to those without LTH (mean±s.d.: 15.7 ± 3.8 ml; P = 0.032). Repeated measures mixed models showed a significant interaction between LTH and time posttreatment when correcting for baseline left testicular volume (β = 0.114, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.018-0.210, P = 0.020), resulting in a catch-up growth of up to 1.37 ml per year (95% CI: 0.221-2.516). Age at intervention was also associated with reduced testicular volume (-0.072 ml per year, 95% CI: -0.135--0.009; P = 0.024). Percutaneous treatment of left varicocele in young adults with LTH can result in catch-up growth over 1 year of follow-up. The reproductive and psychological implications of these findings need to be confirmed in longer and larger prospective studies.

Testicular volume and fertility potential in men operated due to varicocele and testicular hypotrophy in adolescence

INTRODUCTION

Failure to perform surgical repair of varicocele before puberty is among the common causes of male infertility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the testicular volume and fertility potential in men after laparoscopic varicocelectomy conducted in adolescence due to varicocele and concomitant testicular hypotrophy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1996 through 2011, eighty-two adolescents were operated on for unilateral primary varicocele with testicular hypotrophy. Sixty-eight patients were subject to the current analysis. The age of the patients was 13 to 17 years (mean 15.3 years). Clinical diagnosis was established on the basis of andrologic examination and ultrasonography with an assessment of testicular size and varicocele severity. Laparoscopic surgical repair was performed by a transperitoneal approach with division of testicular vein only.

RESULTS

An increase in left testicular volume when compared with the contralateral testis was found in 25 (78.1%) young men with clinical grade 2 varicocele (p = 0.02) and in 32 (88.8%) subjects with grade 3 abnormality (p = 0.04). An increase in left testicular volume was found in 46 (85.1%) of 54 patients with unilateral varicocele and in 12 (85.7%) of 14 subjects operated on for bilateral disease. A left testicular volume increase was comparable independent of the use of uni- or bilateral repair. Fifty-eight (85.2%) of our 68 patients had normozoospermia.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic varicocele repair resulted in a significant increase of hypotrophic testicular volume in 83.8% of our subjects.