Accuracy of quantitative viral secondary standards: a re-examination

Interlaboratory agreement of viral load assays depends on the accuracy and uniformity of quantitative calibrators. Previous work demonstrated poor agreement of secondary cytomegalovirus (CMV) standards with nominal values. This study re-evaluated this issue among commercially produced secondary standards for both BK virus (BKV) and CMV, using digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) to compare the materials from three different manufacturers. Overall, standards showed an improved agreement compared to prior work, against nominal values in both log10 copies/mL and log10 international unit (IU)/mL, with bias from manufacturer-assigned nominal values of 0.0-0.9 log10 units (either copies or IU)/mL. Standards normalized to IU and those values assigned by dPCR rather than by real-time PCR (qPCR) showed better agreement with nominal values. The latter reinforces prior conclusions regarding the utility of using such methods for quantitative value assignment in reference materials. Quantitative standards have improved over the last several years, and the remaining bias from nominal values might be further reduced by universal implementation of dPCR methods for value assignment, normalized to IU.

IMPORTANCE

Interlaboratory agreement of viral load assays depends on accuracy and uniformity of quantitative calibrators. Previous work, published in JCM several years ago, demonstrated poor agreement of secondary cytomegalovirus (CMV) standards with nominal values. This study re-evaluated this issue among commercially produced secondary standards for both BK virus (BKV) and CMV, using digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) to compare the materials from three different manufacturers. Overall, standards showed an improved agreement compared to prior work, against nominal values, indicating a substantial improvement in the production of accurate secondary viral standards, while supporting the need for further work in this area and for the broad adaption of international unit (IU) as a reporting standard for quantitative viral load results.

Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of the Aptima CMV Quant Assay for the Detection and Quantitation of CMV DNA in Plasma Samples

Quantification of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA has become the standard of care in the diagnosis and management of CMV infection in transplant recipients. The objective of the study was to evaluate performance characteristics of the Aptima CMV Quant assay in comparison to Abbott RealTime CMV assay, Qiagen Artus CMV RGQ MDx assay, and Roche cobas CMV test using plasma samples. The performance of the Aptima assay was evaluated by comparing the Exact Diagnostics CMV verification panel and positive controls, Hologic CMV internal reproducibility panel, and SeraCare CMV DNA qualification panel to the RealTime assay. Clinical agreement was evaluated using 389 clinical plasma samples comparing the Aptima assay to three comparator assays. The Aptima assay demonstrated good linearity and strong linear correlation between the assays (R² = 0.99); the intra- and interassay reproducibility was excellent overall (SD = 0.09 to 0.14 and SD = 0.04 to 0.14, respectively); 95% limit of detection (LOD) is 32 IU/mL and LOQ is 45 IU/mL. The SeraCare qualification panel yielded a strong linear correlation (R² = 0.99). A total of 262 positive samples were analyzed to compare Aptima and Realtime assays using Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis and demonstrated a mean bias of 0.092 Log₁₀ IU/mL. Artus (85) and cobas (159) positive samples were compared to the Aptima assay using Deming regression and Bland-Altman analyses and showed mean bias of 0.184 and -0.208 Log₁₀ IU/mL, respectively. The findings demonstrate that the Aptima assay is sensitive and accurate in quantifying CMV in plasma specimens on the fully automated Panther system and that the results were comparable to the other FDA-approved CMV assays.