Villous Morphology in Urinary Bladder Biopsy: An Approach to Diagnosis

Villous morphology in urinary bladder biopsy is a relatively uncommon finding. Villi are slender, finger-like structures that are commonly seen in the small intestine or in neoplastic lesions of gastrointestinal lineage/differentiation. Importantly, placenta also exhibits villi that are morphologically and functionally different from the intestinal one. Majority of the neoplastic lesions of urinary bladder are urothelial in origin with a minor subset showing glandular differentiation. While the presence of benign villi in urinary bladder biopsy necessitates a search for an occult perforation, provided a sample mismatch is ruled out, cytoarchitecturally abnormal/dysplastic villi indicate a neoplastic lesion of the urinary bladder encompassing villous adenoma and adenocarcinoma and urothelial carcinoma with villoglandular differentiation. The dysplastic villi in urinary bladder also imply a lower gastrointestinal endoscopy to rule out a colorectal primary. The development of the villous lesions in the urinary bladder and the colorectum are embryologically related and pose a major diagnostic challenge to the clinicians and surgical pathologists due to identical histomorphology and immunohistochemistry. We tend to discuss the morphological differentials and diagnostic approach to the villous lesions in the urinary bladder biopsy.

Transition between urothelial carcinoma in situ and non-invasive micropapillary carcinoma as a pivot connection between diverse morphologies of bladder carcinoma: a case report of urothelial carcinoma with villoglandular differentiation

Urothelial carcinoma has numerous histological variants, and these variants may coexist in a single case. Here, we present a case of a 70-year-old man with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder with a maximal diameter of 5 mm that involved micropapillary and plasmacytoid variants, with villoglandular differentiation. The presence of these variants was confirmed by pathological examination of a transurethral resection specimen, and high-grade urothelial carcinoma was found as a minor component. Although this bladder carcinoma was classified as pT1, cystoprostatectomy, urethrectomy, and lymphadenectomy were performed due to the presence of the micropapillary and plasmacytoid variants, which are known to be aggressive. Examination of a surgically resected specimen revealed no carcinoma. A transition between urothelial carcinoma in situ and non-invasive micropapillary carcinoma was found to be a pivot point connecting the diverse morphologies of this bladder carcinoma, from which there existed two pathways. One pathway was from urothelial carcinoma in situ to the plasmacytoid variant through invasive high-grade urothelial carcinoma, and the other was from non-invasive micropapillary carcinoma to urothelial carcinoma with villoglandular differentiation or to the micropapillary variant. This is the 16th reported case of urothelial carcinoma with villoglandular differentiation in the literature. As urothelial carcinoma with villoglandular differentiation is often associated with aggressive variants, as shown in our case, it should be reported whenever encountered in routine pathological practice.