1
|
Feis RA, Bouts MJRJ, Panman JL, Jiskoot LC, Dopper EGP, Schouten TM, de Vos F, van der Grond J, van Swieten JC, Rombouts SARB. Single-subject classification of presymptomatic frontotemporal dementia mutation carriers using multimodal MRI. Neuroimage Clin 2018; 20:188-196. [PMID: 30094168 PMCID: PMC6072645 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Classification models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may aid early diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) but have only been applied in established FTD cases. Detection of FTD patients in earlier disease stages, such as presymptomatic mutation carriers, may further advance early diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we aim to distinguish presymptomatic FTD mutation carriers from controls on an individual level using multimodal MRI-based classification. Methods Anatomical MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and resting-state functional MRI data were collected in 55 presymptomatic FTD mutation carriers (8 microtubule-associated protein Tau, 35 progranulin, and 12 chromosome 9 open reading frame 72) and 48 familial controls. We calculated grey and white matter density features from anatomical MRI scans, diffusivity features from DTI, and functional connectivity features from resting-state functional MRI. These features were applied in a recently introduced multimodal behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) classification model, and were subsequently used to train and test unimodal and multimodal carrier-control models. Classification performance was quantified using area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC). Results The bvFTD model was not able to separate presymptomatic carriers from controls beyond chance level (AUC = 0.570, p = 0.11). In contrast, one unimodal and several multimodal carrier-control models performed significantly better than chance level. The unimodal model included the radial diffusivity feature and had an AUC of 0.646 (p = 0.021). The best multimodal model combined radial diffusivity and white matter density features (AUC = 0.680, p = 0.005). Conclusions FTD mutation carriers can be separated from controls with a modest AUC even before symptom-onset, using a newly created carrier-control classification model, while this was not possible using a recent bvFTD classification model. A multimodal MRI-based classification score may therefore be a useful biomarker to aid earlier FTD diagnosis. The exclusive selection of white matter features in the best performing model suggests that the earliest FTD-related pathological processes occur in white matter.
Collapse
Key Words
- (bv)FTD, (behavioural variant) Frontotemporal dementia
- (rs-f)MRI, (resting-state functional) Magnetic resonance imaging
- 3DT1w, 3-dimensional T1-weighted
- AUC, Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve
- AxD, Axial diffusivity
- C9orf72, Chromosome 9 open reading frame 72
- C9orf72, human
- DTI, Diffusion tensor imaging
- DWI, Diffusion-weighted imaging
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging
- FA, Fractional anisotropy
- FCor, Full correlations
- Frontotemporal dementia
- GM, Grey matter
- GMD, Grey matter density
- GRN protein, human
- GRN, Progranulin
- ICA, Independent component analysis
- MAPT protein, human
- MAPT, Microtubule-associated protein Tau
- MD, Mean diffusivity
- MMSE, Mini-mental state examination
- Multimodal MRI
- Pcor, Sparse L1-regularised partial correlations
- RD, Radial diffusivity
- ROC, Receiver operating characteristics
- Resting-state functional MRI
- TBSS, Tract-based spatial statistics
- WM, White matter
- WMD, White matter density
- classification
- machine learning
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogier A Feis
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Mark J R J Bouts
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Jessica L Panman
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Lize C Jiskoot
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Elise G P Dopper
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Alzheimer Centre & Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Tijn M Schouten
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Frank de Vos
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Jeroen van der Grond
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - John C van Swieten
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Serge A R B Rombouts
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kasyap AK, Sah SK, Chaudhary S. Clinical spectrum and risk factors associated with asymptomatic erosive esophagitis as determined by Los Angeles classification: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0192739. [PMID: 29486003 PMCID: PMC5828361 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic and recurrent disease, and it varies in regions. However, to date, there are no reports available on clinical features and the risk factors for the asymptomatic reflux esophagitis in Nepalese adults. METHODS Data were gathered from 142 erosive patients who had undergone endoscopy at Bir Hospital, Kathmandu. Los Angeles classification was used to grade the severity of the disease. Patients were interviewed to find out the presence of various reflux symptoms. RESULTS Based on the Los Angeles classification, the severity of the disease assessed was; grade A 31.8% (31/142), grade B 39.4% (56/142), grade C 33.8% (48/142), and grade D 4.9% (7/142). One hundred and twenty six (88.7%) subjects had reflux symptoms. Prevalence of asymptomatic esophagitis was 16(11.3%). Age was independently linked to asymptomatic esophagitis (P<0.05), and the odd of being asymptomatic appeared lower in younger adults (P<0.05; OR: 0.118; CI: 0.014-.994). CONCLUSION A low prevalence of asymptomatic reflux esophagitis (RE) was seen. Most subjects experienced mild to moderate RE. Age remained an independent factor associated with reflux esophagitis, and the odds of being asymptomatic was lower in younger age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akhilesh Kumar Kasyap
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology unit, National Academy of Medical Science, Bir Hospital Mahabauddha, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Shiv Kumar Sah
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Purbanchal University, Little Buddha College of Health Science, Minbhawan, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Sitaram Chaudhary
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology unit, National Academy of Medical Science, Bir Hospital Mahabauddha, Kathmandu, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McClannahan SB, Baisden MK, Bowles WR. Endodontic diagnostic terminology update. Northwest Dent 2011; 90:25-27. [PMID: 22132547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Determination of the etiology of the patient's chief complaint and a correct diagnosis are paramount prior to a recommendation of endodontic therapy. Reproduction of the patient's chief complaint is critical. If the chief complaint cannot be reproduced, consider consultation with or referral to an endodontist or orofacial pain specialist. The diagnostic terminology presented in this update provides for a more accurate description and communication of the health or pathological conditions of both pulpal and apical tissues. This information is summarized in Table I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott B McClannahan
- Division of Endodontics, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|