Race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors in cholangiocarcinoma: What is driving disparities in receipt of treatment?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic factors are associated with worse cancer outcomes. Our aim was to determine the association of these factors with receipt of surgery and multimodality therapy for cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with cholangiocarcincoma in the National Cancer Database were identified. Racial/ethnic groups were defined as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Asian, and Hispanic. Socioeconomic factors were insurance status, income, and education.

RESULTS

Of 12 095 patients with non-metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, 42% received surgery. Black race was associated with decreased odds of receiving surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 0.66l; P < .001) compared to White patients. Socioeconomic factors accounted for 21% of this disparity. Accounting for socioeconomic and clinicopathologic variables, Black race (OR: 0.73; P < .001), uninsured status (OR: 0.43; P < .001), and Medicaid insurance (OR: 0.63; P < .001) were all associated with decreased receipt of surgery. Of 4808 patients who received surgery, 47% received multimodality therapy. There were no racial/ethnic or socioeconomic differences in receipt of multimodality therapy once patients accessed surgical care. Similar results were seen in patients with advanced disease who received chemotherapy as primary treatment.

CONCLUSION

Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities exist in treatment for cholangiocarcinoma, however only for primary treatment. In patients who received surgery or chemotherapy, there were no disparities in receipt of multimodality therapy. This emphasizes the need to improve initial access to health care for minority and socioeconomical disadvantaged patients.

Cost utility analysis of endoscopic biliary stent in unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: decision analytic modeling approach

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic biliary drainage using metal and plastic stent in unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCA) is widely used but little is known about their cost-effectiveness. This study evaluated the cost-utility of endoscopic metal and plastic stent drainage in unresectable complex, Bismuth type II-IV, HCA patients.

METHODOLOGY

Decision analytic model, Markov model, was used to evaluate cost and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of endoscopic biliary drainage in unresectable HCA. Costs of treatment and utilities of each Markov state were retrieved from hospital charges and unresectable HCA patients from tertiary care hospital in Thailand, respectively. Transition probabilities were derived from international literature. Base case analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Under the base-case analysis, metal stent is more effective but more expensive than plastic stent. An incremental cost per additional QALY gained is 192,650 baht (US$ 6,318). From probabilistic sensitivity analysis, at the willingness to pay threshold of one and three times GDP per capita or 158,000 baht (US$ 5,182) and 474,000 baht (US$ 15,546), the probability of metal stent being cost-effective is 26.4% and 99.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the WHO recommendation regarding the cost-effectiveness threshold criteria, endoscopic metal stent drainage is cost-effective compared to plastic stent in unresectable complex HCA.

Tannenbaum and metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal bile duct obstruction: a comparative study of patency and cost effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Stent clogging is the major limitation of palliative treatment for malignant biliary obstruction. Metal stents have much better patency than plastic stents, but are more expensive. Preliminary data suggest that the recently designed plastic (Tannenbaum) stent has better duration of patency than the polyethylene stent. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and cost effectiveness between the Tannenbaum stent without side holes and the uncovered metal stent for patients with malignant distal common bile duct obstruction.

METHODS

In this study, 47 patients (median age, 73 years, range, 56-86 years) with inoperable malignant distal common bile duct strictures were prospectively randomized to receive either a Tannenbaum stent (n = 24) or an uncovered self-expandable metal stent (n = 23). The patients were clinically evaluated, and biochemical tests were analyzed if necessary until their death or surgery for gastric outlet obstruction. Cumulative first stent patency and patient survival were compared between the two groups. Cost-effectiveness analysis also was performed for the two study groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. The median first stent patency was longer in the metal group than in the Tannenbaum stent group (255 vs 123.5 days; p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in survival between the two groups. The total cost associated with the Tannenbaum stents was lower than for the metal stents (17,700 vs 30,100 euros; p = 0.001), especially for patients with liver metastases (3,000 vs 6,900 euros; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Metal stent placement is an effective treatment for inoperable malignant distal common bile duct obstruction, but Tannenbaum stent placement is a cost-saving strategy, as compared with metal stent placement, especially for patients with liver metastases and expected short survival time.