Analysis aqueous humor lipid profile of neovascular glaucoma secondary to diabetic retinopathy and lipidomic alteration response to anti-VEGF treatment

The objective of this study was to examine the lipid spectrum of aqueous humor (AH) in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy and to investigate the lipid alteration response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. Lipidomic analysis using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was conducted to compare the lipid profiles of the AH in NVG patients with those of a control group. Lipid changes in the AH of NVG patients before and after intravitreal conbercept injections were also evaluated. The identification of lipids showing differential expression was accomplished through both multivariate and univariate analyses. This study included 13 NVG patients and 20 control subjects. Based on LipidSearch software, 639 lipid species across 33 lipid classes were detected in the participants' AH. The combination of univariate and multivariate statistical analyses yielded 53 differentially expressed lipids (VIP >1 and P < 0.05). In addition, 9 lipids were found to be differentially expressed before and after the intravitreal conbercept injections in the NVG patients. Significant alterations in the metabolic pathways of glycerophospholipid and glycerolipid exhibited notable changes. Our results highlighted the lipid changes in patients' AH in relation to the progression of NVG, and indicated that the modified lipids could potentially be utilized as therapeutic targets for NVG.

Retrospective Analysis of Radiation-Induced Complications of Uveal Melanoma Patients Treated With Brachytherapy in the Era of Anti-VEGF

PURPOSE

To associate clinical factors and radiation doses delivered by iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy to visual outcomes and development of radiation-induced ocular complications in patients with uveal melanoma in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for 225 patients treated with iodine-125 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma. The effects of radiation doses (focal doses, average dose to the entire eye, and integral dose) on visual outcomes and development of radiation complications (radiation retinopathy, radiation optic neuropathy, vitreous hemorrhage, and neovascular glaucoma) were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression snalysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 33.6 months (range, 12-105.6 months). Radiation retinopathy was associated with younger age, tumor distance to optic nerve <6 mm, and maximum radiation dose to fovea. Radiation optic neuropathy was associated with White race, tumor distance to optic nerve <6 mm, and integral radiation dose. Vitreous hemorrhage was associated with White race and integral radiation dose. Incidence of neovascular glaucoma was low in our study, with 2 patients (0.9%) developing the complication. Of the 123 patients who developed radiation retinopathy, 82 patients (66.7% of radiation retinopathy patients, 37.3% of total patients) received anti-VEGF injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found multiple associations between radiation doses and complications as well as visual outcomes on multivariate analysis. Given that the majority of our patients who developed radiation retinopathy received anti-VEGF injections, our study helps to illustrate the course and progression of radiation-induced complications in the new era of anti-VEGF.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different anti-VEGF agents combined with different delivery methods for neovascular glaucoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents combined with different delivery methods for neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

DESIGN

Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN and Chinese databases including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science Periodical Database (Wanfang Database), VIP Journal Integration Platform and China Biology Medicine Database were searched from inception to 5 September 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the treatment of NVG using different anti-VEGF agents combined with various methods of drug administration, without any language limitations. All patients included underwent panretinal laser photocoagulation and there were no restrictions on prior glaucoma surgery.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Random-effect Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety and rank priority of anti-VEGF regimens. The source of heterogeneity and the related factors affecting the stability of the results were also explored. CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 17 RCTs involving a total of 1311 eyes from 1228 patients. We examined five different treatment regimens, which used three different anti-VEGF drugs. The following treatments showed a significant decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with the control group at 1 month after glaucoma surgery: simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral injection of conbercept (ICCIVC) (mean difference (MD)=-11.56, 95% credible interval (CrI) -20.8 to -2.24), intravitreal injection of conbercept (MD=-8.88, 95% CrI -13.93 to -3.78), intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (MD=-7.62, 95% CrI -10.91 to -4.33) and intravitreal injection of bevacizumab IVB) (MD=-5.51, 95% CrI -10.79 to -0.35). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis indicated that ICCIVC (82.0%) may be the most effective regimen in reducing IOP. In terms of safety, there were no statistically significant differences among the interventions. According to the SUCRA analysis, ICCIVC (68.0%) was considered the safest choice with the fewest complications. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses showed that mean age was the main source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the study results.

CONCLUSION

ICCIVC was more effective and safer than other anti-VEGF regimens for NVG. Simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral injection was found to be the best route of administration, and conbercept was found to be the superior drug selection when compared with ranibizumab and bevacizumab.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022309676.

Trabeculectomy with concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab in neovascular glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection with trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) in neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

METHODS

Patients with NVG who underwent trabeculectomy with concurrent IVB (group 1) and those who underwent IVB sequentially, followed by trabeculectomy with MMC (group 2) in 1-2 weeks between January 2021 and August 2022, were included in this retrospective hospital-based study. The need for medications for intraocular pressure (IOP) control at 6 months in the two groups was the primary outcome measured and compared between the groups. The association of the need for medications postoperatively with clinical variables was assessed using stepwise multivariate regression statistics.

RESULTS

We finally included 40 patients ( n = 12 in group 1, n = 28 in group 2) with no significant differences in presenting age between groups. The IOP at 1 day and 1 week were not significantly different between groups though the IOP at 1, 3, and 6 months. IOP was lower in group 1 eyes with the 6-month IOP, being significantly lower in group 1, P = 0.05. Three eyes in group 1 and 11 eyes in group 2 required anti-glaucoma medications in the postoperative period. Multivariate regression identified preoperative IVB >3 (β =0.7, P < 0.001) and recurrent vitreous hemorrhage (β = 0.7, P = 0.004) as prognostic factors ( R2 = 40.6%) determining the need for anti-glaucoma medication (AGM) postoperatively in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent IVB with trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C is a feasible alternative in patients with NVG with refractory high-presenting IOP. This may serve to address raised IOP as well as retinal ischemia, thereby improving surgical success rates in the most challenging NVG cases.

Short-Term Outcomes of Trabeculectomy With or Without Anti-VEGF in Patients With Neovascular Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of trabeculectomy alone or combined with intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of trabeculectomy alone or combined with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. We searched four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) up to January 2023 and extracted data on three surgical outcomes: postoperative intraocular pressure, success rate and complications. We used a random-effects model to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed publication bias using Begg and Egger tests.

Results

We included seven studies with 353 eyes. Compared to trabeculectomy alone, trabeculectomy with anti-VEGF had a lower risk of postoperative complications (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.89) and higher success rate (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.40). The intraocular pressure reduction was significantly greater in the trabeculectomy with anti-VEGF augmentation group than the trabeculectomy group from 1 week (SMD, -1.36; 95% CI, -2.76 to 0.04) to 6 months (SMD, -0.79; 95% CI, -1.50 to -0.07) after surgery.

Conclusions

According to current evidence, adding intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents to trabeculectomy may improve the short time outcomes of patients with neovascular glaucoma.

RISK FACTORS FOR SURGERY OR BLINDNESS IN NEOVASCULAR GLAUCOMA EYES TREATED WITH ANTI-VEGF INJECTIONS BY A RETINA SPECIALIST

PURPOSE

To determine baseline patient characteristics that predict the need for glaucoma surgery or blindness in eyes with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) despite intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with NVG who had not previously received glaucoma surgery and were treated with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections at the time of diagnosis, from September 8, 2011, to May 8, 2020, at a large, retina subspecialty practice.

RESULTS

Of 301 newly presenting NVG eyes, 31% required glaucoma surgery and 20% progressed to no light perception vision despite treatment. Patients with intraocular pressure >35 mmHg ( P < 0.001), two or more topical glaucoma medications ( P = 0.003), worse than 20/100 vision ( P = 0.024), proliferative diabetic retinopathy ( P = 0.001), eye pain or discomfort ( P = 0.010), and new patient status ( P = 0.015) at the time of NVG diagnosis were at a higher risk of glaucoma surgery or blindness regardless of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. The effect of panretinal photocoagulation was not statistically significant in a subgroup analysis of patients without media opacity ( P = 0.199).

CONCLUSION

Several baseline characteristics at the time of presentation to a retina specialist with NVG seem to portend a higher risk of uncontrolled glaucoma despite the use of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Prompt referral of these patients to a glaucoma specialist should be strongly considered.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a potentially blinding, secondary glaucoma. It is caused by the formation of abnormal new blood vessels, which prevent normal drainage of aqueous from the anterior segment of the eye. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications are specific inhibitors of the primary mediators of neovascularization. Studies have reported the effectiveness of anti-VEGF medications for the control of intraocular pressure (IOP) in NVG.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of intraocular anti-VEGF medications, alone or with one or more types of conventional therapy, compared with no anti-VEGF medications for the treatment of NVG.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register); MEDLINE; Embase; PubMed; and LILACS to 19 October 2021; metaRegister of Controlled Trials to 19 October 2021; and two additional trial registers to 19 October 2021. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people treated with anti-VEGF medications for NVG.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the search results for trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence. We resolved discrepancies through discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five RCTs (356 eyes of 353 participants). Each trial was conducted in a different country: two in China, and one each in Brazil, Egypt, and Japan. All five RCTs included both men and women; the mean age of participants was 55 years or older. Two RCTs compared intravitreal bevacizumab combined with Ahmed valve implantation and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) with Ahmed valve implantation and PRP alone. One RCT randomized participants to receive an injection of either intravitreal aflibercept or placebo at the first visit, followed by non-randomized treatment according to clinical findings after one week. The remaining two RCTs randomized participants to PRP with and without ranibizumab, one of which had insufficient details for further analysis. We assessed the RCTs to have an unclear risk of bias for most domains due to insufficient information to permit judgment.   Four RCTs examined achieving control of IOP, three of which reported our time points of interest. Only one RCT reported our critical time point at one month; it found that the anti-VEGF group had a 1.3-fold higher chance of achieving control of IOP at one month (RR 1.32, 95% 1.10 to 1.59; 93 participants) than the non-anti-VEGF group (low certainty of evidence). For other time points, one RCT found a three-fold greater achievement in control of IOP in the anti-VEGF group when compared with the non-anti-VEGF group at one year (RR 3.00; 95% CI:1.35 to 6.68; 40 participants). However, another RCT found an inconclusive result at the time period ranging from 1.5 years to three years (RR 1.08; 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.75; 40 participants).  All five RCTs examined mean IOP, but at different time points. Very-low-certainty evidence showed that anti-VEGFs were effective in reducing mean IOP by 6.37 mmHg (95% CI: -10.09 to -2.65; 3 RCTs; 173 participants) at four to six weeks when compared with no anti-VEGFs.  Anti-VEGFs may reduce mean IOP at three months (MD -4.25; 95% CI -12.05 to 3.54; 2 studies; 75 participants), six months (MD -5.93; 95% CI -18.13 to 6.26; 2 studies; 75 participants), one year (MD -5.36; 95% CI -18.50 to 7.77; 2 studies; 75 participants), and more than one year (MD -7.05; 95% CI -16.61 to 2.51; 2 studies; 75 participants) when compared with no anti-VEGFs, but such effects remain uncertain. Two RCTs reported the proportion of participants who achieved an improvement in visual acuity with specified time points. Participants receiving anti-VEGFs had a 2.6 times (95% CI 1.60 to 4.08; 1 study; 93 participants) higher chance of improving visual acuity when compared with those not receiving anti-VEGFs at one month (very low certainty of evidence). Likewise, another RCT found a similar result at 18 months (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.33 to 12.05; 1 study; 40 participants).  Two RCTs reported the outcome, complete regression of new iris vessels, at our time points of interest. Low-certainty evidence showed that anti-VEGFs had a nearly three times higher chance of complete regression of new iris vessels when compared with no anti-VEGFs (RR 2.63, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.18; 1 study; 93 participants). A similar finding was observed at more than one year in another RCT (RR 3.20, 95% CI 1.45 to 7.05; 1 study; 40 participants).  Regarding adverse events, there was no evidence that the risks of hypotony and tractional retinal detachment were different between the two groups (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.12 to 3.57 and RR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.01 to 7.72, respectively; 1 study; 40 participants). No RCTs reported incidents of endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage, no light perception, and serious adverse events. Evidence for the adverse events of anti-VEGFs was low due to limitations in the study design due to insufficient information to permit judgments and imprecision of results due to the small sample size. No trial reported the proportion of participants with relief of pain and resolution of redness at any time point.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-VEGFs as an adjunct to conventional treatment could help reduce IOP in NVG in the short term (four to six weeks), but there is no evidence that this is likely in the longer term. Currently available evidence regarding the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of anti-VEGFs in achieving control of IOP, visual acuity, and complete regression of new iris vessels in NVG is insufficient. More research is needed to investigate the effect of these medications compared with, or in addition to, conventional surgical or medical treatment in achieving these outcomes in NVG.

[Changes of cytokines in the aqueous humor of neovascular glaucoma at the angle-closure stage]

Objective: To evaluate the concentration of cytokines in the aqueous humor of neovascular glaucoma (NVG) patients at the angle-closure stage in different treatment periods and its relationship with recurrence. Methods: A prospective case-control study. Angle-closure stage NVG patients who came to Peking University Third Hospital from September 2018 to September 2019 were enrolled and followed-up for at least 12 months. Patients received triple sequential therapy, including anti-vascular endothelium growth factor (VEGF) injection, trabeculectomy, and panretinal photocoagulation. The aqueous humor before anti-VEGF treatment, before trabeculectomy, and during recurrence was collected. Multiplex bead immunoassay was applied to measure the concentration of 45 cytokines including VEGF, interleukin (IL), and chemokine. The relevant data were compared with the values of 25 proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) patients and 24 age-related cataract patients undergoing phacoemulsification as controls. The concentration of cytokines was presented as M (Q₁, Q₃). The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H test was applied to compare the cytokine concentration between the NVG group and controls. The difference between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups was compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The average age of NVG patients was (60±11) years, and there were 22 males and 10 females. No significant differences were found in age and gender between the NVG group and the two control groups (both P>0.05). The median concentrations of VEGF in the NVG group before anti-VEGF treatment, before trabeculectomy, and after recurrence were 2 151.3 (1 433.1, 4 280.0) ng/L, 655.4 (287.3, 836.3) ng/L and 2 003.4 (1 603.1, 2 468.9) ng/L respectively. The concentrations of VEGF before anti-VEGF treatment and after recurrence in the NVG group were significantly higher than the PDR group [453.8 (189.9, 595.8) ng/L] and the cataract group [143.5 (112.7, 269.8) ng/L] (all P<0.05). The median concentration of programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) was 38.9 (22.4, 50.6) ng/L before anti-VEGF treatment, higher than that in the PDR group [12.0 (6.3, 20.1) ng/L] and the cataract group [14.6 (11.4, 19.3) ng/L]. The median concentration of fractalkine was 242.7 (189.0, 306.7) ng/L, higher than that in the PDR group [131.1 (119.1, 157.6) ng/L] and the cataract group [116.7 (10.2, 135.9) ng/L]. The median concentration of IL-7 was 18.0 (12.0, 32.7) ng/L, higher than that in the PDR group [7.7 (2.0, 10.8) ng/L] and the cataract group [3.3 (1.9, 6.8) ng/L]. The median concentration of eotaxin was 84.0 (52.4, 122.7) ng/L, higher than that in the PDR group [26.6 (17.1, 72.3) ng/L] and the cataract group [7.1 (5.6, 14.8) ng/L]. The median concentration of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) was 3.6 (2.8, 6.4) ng/L, higher than that in the cataract group [1.1 (0.3, 2.3) ng/L]. All the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the NVG and control groups in other cytokines or other treatment periods (all P>0.05). Six NVG patients suffered recurrence during the follow-up. The baseline concentration of IL-7 of these patients [10.5 (8.4, 16.0) ng/L] was significantly lower than that in patients who did not have recurred disease [22.7 (15.7, 34.1) ng/L] (Z=-2.74, P<0.01). Conclusions: In the angle-closure stage of NVG patients, the concentrations of VEGF, PD-L1, fractalkine, IL-7, eotaxin, and TRAIL in the aqueous humor significantly increase during the onset of disease. Lower IL-7 may indicate a recurring tendency.

Effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor on the surgical outcome of neovascular glaucoma: An overview and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab is known to be very effective in inhibiting ocular neovascularization in neovascular glaucoma (NVG). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor on the surgical outcome of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation (AGVI) in NVG.

METHODS

An extensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was carried out in January 2021 to select relevant studies. The weighted mean difference of the intraocular pressure reduction percentage from baseline to endpoint was used for the primary efficacy estimate. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for success rate were employed as secondary efficacy estimates. The number of postoperative interventions and the tolerability estimate for adverse events were also measured using odds ratios. We conducted meta-analyses of fixed effects models using comprehensive meta-analysis software to pool the results of the included studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q-value and I2 measures.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the analysis, encompassing a total of 410 eyes. There was no significant difference in intraocular pressure reduction percentage between the AGVI-only group and the AGVI with adjuvant bevacizumab group (estimate 0.324; 95% CI, -0.278-0.926; P = .244). However, the success rate favored the AGVI with adjuvant bevacizumab group (estimate 0.561; 95% CI, 0.097-1.025, P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

AGVI with adjuvant bevacizumab had no significant effect on lowering IOP in patients with neovascular glaucoma compared with AGVI alone. However, the final success rate was higher for AGVI with adjuvant bevacizumab treatment than with AGVI alone.

Comparison of conbercept and ranibizumab combined mitomycin C-augmented trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and security of conbercept and ranibizumab combined with trabeculectomy and panretinal photocoagulation for neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

METHODS

One hundred and sixty patients with NVG were randomly divided into a conbercept group comprised of 80 patients and a ranibizumab group comprised of 80 patients. The postoperative and preoperative visual acuities, intraocular pressures frequency of anti-glaucoma medications, and surgical complications were recorded. The expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (FLT-1), and placenta-like growth factor (PLGF) in the aqueous humor were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Examining the fundus and obtaining photographs used indirect ophthalmoscopy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses estimated the success rates.

RESULTS

All patient follow-up periods were at 1 year. The differences observed in IOP and the frequencies of anti-glaucoma medications at various follow-up time points were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). The differences observed in both the group visual acuities at various follow-up time points were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Rates of surgery complications were 18.75% and 25.00% in the conbercept group and ranibizumab group, respectively. The expressions of VEGF, FLT-1, and PLGF significantly decreased (all P < 0.05). The recurrence percentages were 30.00% and 36.25% after conbercept and ranibizumab treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The conbercept effects were similar with that of ranibizumab. Intravitreal injection of conbercept was effective for NVG treatment, which provides a new therapeutic drug for NVG treatment.

Combined vitrectomy, near-confluent panretinal endolaser, bevacizumab and cyclophotocoagulation for neovascular glaucoma - a retrospective interventional case series

Background: Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a severe, potentially blinding disease and a therapeutic challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an integrative surgical approach to neovascular glaucoma. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a one-year follow-up of a consecutive interventional case series of NVG. Eyes underwent transscleral cyclophotocoagulation, pars plana vitrectomy, near-confluent panretinal photocoagulation, and intravitreal bevacizumab. Phakic eyes underwent concomitant cataract surgery. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), intraocular pressure (IOP, mmHg), number of glaucoma medication, visual analog pain scale (VAPS, 0-10) were recorded at baseline, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Blind eyes were excluded. Results: Seventy-seven eyes of 77 patients (45 male, 32 female, mean age 73.6±12.2 years) were included. NVG underlying conditions included retinal vein occlusion (41.6%), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (35.1%), central retinal artery occlusion (19.5%), and ocular ischemic syndrome (3.9%). Mean IOP decreased postoperatively from 46.3±10.1 mmHg to 14.5±7.9 mmHg (p<0.001), glaucoma medication from 4.7±1.3 to 1.8±1.8 (p<0.001), and VAPS from 6.0±1.8 to 0. BCVA remained unchanged. Postoperative intraocular inflammation had resolved in all eyes at the one-month follow-up. 71.4% (55/77) eyes did not require additional major interventions during follow-up. Conclusions: A single, comprehensive surgery session lowered IOP significantly, reduced GMS, and controlled pain.

Combined vitrectomy, near-confluent panretinal endolaser, bevacizumab and cyclophotocoagulation for neovascular glaucoma - a retrospective interventional case series

Background: Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a severe, potentially blinding disease and a therapeutic challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an integrative surgical approach to neovascular glaucoma. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a one-year follow-up of a consecutive interventional case series of NVG. Eyes underwent transscleral cyclophotocoagulation, pars plana vitrectomy, near-confluent panretinal photocoagulation, and intravitreal bevacizumab. Phakic eyes underwent concomitant cataract surgery. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), intraocular pressure (IOP, mmHg), number of glaucoma medication, visual analog pain scale (VAPS, 0-10) were recorded at baseline, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Blind eyes were excluded. Results: Seventy-seven eyes of 77 patients (45 male, 32 female, mean age 73.6±12.2 years) were included. NVG underlying conditions included retinal vein occlusion (41.6%), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (35.1%), central retinal artery occlusion (19.5%), and ocular ischemic syndrome (3.9%). Mean IOP decreased postoperatively from 46.3±10.1 mmHg to 14.5±7.9 mmHg (p<0.001), glaucoma medication from 4.7±1.3 to 1.8±1.8 (p<0.001), and VAPS from 6.0±1.8 to 0. BCVA remained unchanged. Postoperative intraocular inflammation had resolved in all eyes at the one-month follow-up. 71.4% (55/77) eyes did not require additional major interventions during follow-up. Conclusions: A single, comprehensive surgery session lowered IOP significantly, reduced GMS, and controlled pain.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a potentially blinding, secondary glaucoma. It is caused by the formation of abnormal new blood vessels, which prevent normal drainage of aqueous from the anterior segment of the eye. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications are specific inhibitors of the primary mediators of neovascularization. Studies have reported the effectiveness of anti-VEGF medications for the control of intraocular pressure (IOP) in NVG.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of intraocular anti-VEGF medications, alone or with one or more type of conventional therapy, compared with no anti-VEGF medications for the treatment of NVG.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register); MEDLINE; Embase; PubMed; and LILACS to 22 March 2019; metaRegister of Controlled Trials to 13 August 2013; and two additional trial registers to 22 March 2019. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people treated with anti-VEGF medications for NVG.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the search results for trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias, and the certainty of the evidence. We resolved discrepancies through discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs (263 participants) and identified one ongoing RCT. Each trial was conducted in a different country: China, Brazil, Egypt, and Japan. We assessed the trials to have an unclear risk of bias for most domains due to insufficient information. Two trials compared intravitreal bevacizumab combined with Ahmed valve implantation and panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) with Ahmed valve implantation and PRP. We did not combine these two trials due to substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity. One trial randomised participants to receive an injection of either an intravitreal anti-VEGF medication or placebo at the first visit, followed by non-randomised treatment according to clinical findings after one week. The last trial randomised participants to PRP with and without ranibizumab, but details of the study were unavailable for further analysis. Two trials that examined IOP showed inconsistent results. One found inconclusive results for mean IOP between participants who received anti-VEGF medications and those who did not, at one month (mean difference [MD] -1.60 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.98 to 1.78; 40 participants), and at one year (MD 1.40 mmHg, 95% CI -4.04 to 6.84; 30 participants). Sixty-five percent of the participants with anti-VEGF medications achieved IOP ≤ 21 mmHg, versus 60% without anti-VEGF medications. In another trial, those who received anti-VEGF medications were more likely to reduce their IOP than those who did not receive them, at one month (MD -6.50 mmHg, 95% CI -7.93 to -5.07; 40 participants), and at one year (MD -12.00 mmHg, 95% CI -16.79 to -7.21; 40 participants). Ninety-five percent of the participants with anti-VEGF medications achieved IOP ≤ 21 mmHg, versus 50% without anti-VEGF medications. The certainty of a body of evidence was low for this outcome due to limitations in the design and inconsistency of results between studies. Post-operative complications included anterior chamber bleeding (3 eyes) and conjunctival hemorrhage (2 participants) in the anti-VEGF medications group, and retinal detachment and phthisis bulbi (1 participant each) in the control group. The certainty of evidence is low due to imprecision of results and indirectness of evidence. No trial reported the proportion of participants with improvement in visual acuity, proportion of participants with complete regression of new iris vessels, or the proportion of participants with relief of pain and resolution of redness at four- to six-week, or one-year follow-up.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently available evidence is uncertain regarding the long-term effectiveness of anti-VEGF medications, such as intravitreal ranibizumab or bevacizumab or aflibercept, as an adjunct to conventional treatment in lowering IOP in NVG. More research is needed to investigate the long-term effect of these medications compared with, or in addition to, conventional surgical or medical treatment in lowering IOP in NVG.

Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation versus suprachoroidal silicone tube implantation following the injection of bevacizumab into the anterior chamber in patients with neovascular glaucoma

PURPOSE

This study compared the efficacy and safety of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation versus suprachoroidal silicone tube (SST) implantation after the injection of bevacizumab into the anterior chamber in patients with neovascular glaucoma.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to undergo AGV or SST implantation. Bevacizumab was injected into the anterior chamber at a dosage of 1.25 mg/0.1 mL, 1 week before surgery. Intraocular pressure (IOP) control, complication, and success rates were compared between the groups. Success was defined as a final IOP > 5 mmHg, < 22 mmHg with or without any antiglaucoma drug.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were enrolled in the study, including 13 (56.5%) in the AGV group (group 1) and 10 (43.5%) in the SST group (group 2). The mean baseline IOP was 42.0 ± 9.1 mmHg in group 1 and 39.5 ± 10 mmHg in group 2 (p > 0.05). The mean IOP was 16.9 ± 7.0 mmHg in group 1 and 12.5 ± 6.7 mmHg in group 2 on the first day after surgery. After a mean follow-up period of 19.4 ± 5.2 months, success was achieved in 12 (92.3%) patients in group 1 and in 1 (10%) patient in group 2. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of the success rate between groups (p < 0.05). Complications included hyphema in three (23%) patients, obstruction of the AGV tube by iris tissue in one (7.7%) patient, and tube exposure in one patient (7.7%) in group 1. Suprachoroidal silicone tube dislocation to the anterior chamber was observed in one (10%) patient in group 2.

CONCLUSION

AGV implantation after the injection of bevacizumab into the anterior chamber had a higher success rate than SST implantation. Complications were seen more frequently in the AGV group.

Safety of antivascular endothelial growth factor administration in the ocular anterior segment in pterygium and neovascular glaucoma treatment: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-VEGF agents has been widely used in ocular diseases, but its safety for treating anterior segment disorders, the conclusions are controversial.

METHODS

Several major databases, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, were searched. Safety data from 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were used to compare anti-VEGF treatment in the ocular anterior segment in pterygium and neovascular glaucoma treatment with placebo/sham treatment for eye diseases. A meta-analysis for adverse events was performed.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCT studies with 955 eyes were included in the meta-analysis. Significant difference in conjunctival disorders (OR: 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01-2.59; P = .05) was noted among the included studies, but not in ocular intolerance (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.34-1.62; P = .46), corneal disorders (OR: 0.71; 95% CI, 0.37-1.37; P = .31), or the subgroup analysis of conjunctival disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of anti-VEGF agents in the ocular anterior segment for patients with pterygium and glaucoma was tolerable in tolerance and cornea, but was the risk factor of conjunctival disorders. The healing of corneal epithelium may be delayed in patients with primary corneal epithelial defects after anti-VEGF application. However, due to the limited evidence, further research should be performed on the safety of anti-VEGF administration in patients with different corneal disorders.

Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Neovascular Glaucoma following Central Retinal Artery Occlusion

Purpose

To report a case of neovascular glaucoma due to central retinal artery occlusion treated with a single intravitreal injection of bevacizumab.

Methods

A 68-year-old patient with a 10-week history of central retinal artery occlusion presented with neovascularization of the iris and the angle and intraocular pressure of 30 mmHg. The patient received a single injection of 1.25 mg bevacizumab in 0.1 mL intravitreally.

Results

Iris and angle neovascularization regressed within 48 hours of the injection. Intraocular pressure dropped from 30 to 15 mmHg, and there was marked improvement in patient comfort. Panretinal photocoagulation was applied 4 weeks after the injection.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab seems to be a useful adjunct to panretinal photocoagulation in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. (Eur J Ophthalmol 2007; 17: 269–71)

[The influence of VEGF inhibitors on corneal endothelium after injection into the anterior chamber in a porcine eye model]

BACKGROUND

The injection of antiangiogenic agents, such as ranibizumab (Lucentis®) and bevacizumab (Avastin®) into the anterior chamber of the eye represents a suitable alternative for treating neovascular glaucoma by reducing intraocular pressure.

OBJECTIVES

As the antiangiogenic substances are in direct contact with the sensitive corneal endothelium, the aim of this study was to show the effects of intracameral injection of ranibizumab and bevacizumab on this cell layer.

METHODS

Each injection consisted of 50 µl containing either ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 ml), bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) or triamcinolone containing benzyl alcohol (2 mg/0.05 ml) which was used as the control group. These compounds were injected into the anterior chamber of pig eyes. Afterwards the corneas were dissected, fixed, examined by a scanning electron microscopy and evaluated according to a specified score. Assessment of the endothelium was carried out by evaluating the condition of microvilli, cell borders, cell surface and cell pattern. The findings were compared to untreated corneas and those injected with 50 µl of balanced salt solution (BSS).

RESULTS

The corneal endothelium exposed to the antiangiogenic substances showed only minor changes in comparison to the controls treated only with BSS. Also seen during this research was the irreversible cell damage in the control group using triamcinolone.

CONCLUSION

Ranibizumab and bevacizumab have no damaging effects on the corneal endothelium when used in the anterior chamber. They can be administered as an intracameral injection for the treatment of rubeotic secondary glaucoma. Triamcinolon containing benzyl alcohol causes severe damage to the endothelial cells of the cornea by direct contact.

Placenta Growth Factor in Eyes with Neovascular Glaucoma Is Decreased after Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection

Purpose

To evaluate changes in the concentrations of placental growth factor (PlGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) in aqueous humor of patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) before and after an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) and to determine the underlying correlation between the levels.

Methods

The prospective interventional comparative study involved 20 eyes of 20 patients with surgery-required advanced NVG and 20 control subjects from January 2013 to November 2013. The NVG eyes received the IVR treatment before glaucoma surgery. Aqueous humor was collected at the time of the IVR injection (pre- IVR) and at the time of antiglaucomatous surgery (post-IVR). Aqueous humor was also collected at the time of cataract surgery in normal control. Aqueous humor and plasma VEGF-A and PlGF levels were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods, respectively.

Results

The mean aqueous humor PlGF and VEGF-A concentrations in the pre-IVR eyes were significantly higher than in those of the control subjects (p<0.001), whereas the plasma levels showed no significant difference. There was a statistically significant correlation between the aqueous humor PlGF and the VEGF-A concentration (r = 0.612, p = 0.003). The mean aqueous humor PlGF in the post-IVR eyes dramatically decreased from 1078.36 ± 755.83 to 177.64 ± 151.73 pg/mL (p<0.001). The VEGF-A level showed a similar trend from 3697.64 ± 2104.47 pg/mL to 183.54 ± 130.35 pg/mL (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Aqueous humor concentrations of VEGF-A and PlGF were significantly elevated in the eyes with NVG, and there was a positive correlation between the levels. After an IVR treatment, VEGF-A and PlGF were significantly decreased in NVG eyes.

Efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab combined with Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Neovascular glaucoma is a refractive glaucoma. Recently, anti-VEGF factors have been used alone or in combination for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. However, the medium- and long-term efficacy of such drugs remains to be evaluated. This study was to determine the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab combined with Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma.

METHODS

In this prospective non-randomized study, 43 neovascular glaucoma patients (43 eyes) were assigned to receive either 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab for three to 14 days before Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation (injection group, n = 21) or Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation alone (control group, n = 22). The patients were followed up for six to 12 months. Differences in surgical success rate, intraocular pressure, best corrected visual acuity, anti-glaucoma medications and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Surgical success was defined as IOP > = 6 mm Hg and < = 21 mm Hg, with or without the use of anti-glaucoma medications, and without severe complications or reoperation.

RESULTS

Of the 43 patients, 40 completed the 6-month follow-up and 37 completed the 1-year follow-up. Success rate was 73.7% vs. 71.4% at six months and 72.2% vs. 68.4% at 12 months in the injection group and the control group respectively. No significant difference was noted between the two groups (six months: P = 0.87, 12 months: P = 1.00). There were no significant differences in the two groups with respect to intraocular pressure, best corrected visual acuity, anti-glaucoma medications or postoperative complications at six months or 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Single intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 mg) before surgery has no significant effect on the medium- or long-term outcomes of neovascular glaucoma treated with Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR-OOC-14005709, Trial registration date: 2014-12-01).

Neovascular Glaucoma

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a secondary ocular pathological condition resulting from a myriad of ocular and systemic conditions with retinal ischemia as a mediator in over 95% of cases. NVG is caused by the growth of a fibrovascular membrane secondary to a local angiogenic stimulus over the trabecular meshwork obstructing aqueous outflow. This results in an initial secondary open-angle glaucoma stage that may be amenable to intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications and modulation of the underlying ischemic process, often in combination with panretinal photocoagulation and adjunctive use of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. In the more advanced stages of neovascularization, connective tissue myofibroblasts associated with new vessel growth contract causing progressive synechial closure of the anterior-chamber angle. Elevation of IOP, once significant secondary angle closure is established, tends to be refractory to topical and oral IOP-lowering medications and often requires glaucoma surgical interventions.

Anti-VEGF intravitreal bevacizumab for radiation-associated neovascular glaucoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To report outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab therapy in radiation-associated neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective interventional case series, 12 eyes with NVG after radiation therapy for ocular malignancy were treated with periodic intravitreal injections of 1.25 mg bevacizumab. Outcome measures included changes in iris neovascularization, intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, and pain.

RESULTS

One month after the first injection, iris neovascularization regressed in nine of 12 eyes (75%), and IOP decreased in eight of 12 eyes (67%) by a mean of 10.1 mm Hg. Patients were monitored for a mean of 26.5 months after their first injection. Six eyes subsequently underwent enucleation for pain control (four eyes; 66%), chronic uveitis (one eye; 17%), and tumor recurrence (one eye; 17%). All remaining patients experienced deterioration in visual acuity (range: 20/160 to no light perception), but pain control was good and IOP normalized in four patients.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal bevacizumab therapy should be considered for patients with radiation-associated NVG who wish to avoid enucleation.

[Application of anti-VEGF agents in treatment of neovascular glaucoma and anti-scarring in filtering surgery]

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a group of secondary glaucoma which led by a variety of diseases that have anoxia or ischemia to the retina. Some studies have found that the etiology was related to the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). At present, anti-VEGF as a treatment method to NVG, has become an important advance in the field of glaucoma research, which established a new way to improve the prognosis. This review mainly focused on the pathophysiologic basis and clinical research of NVG, fundamental research and applications about four kinds of anti-VEGF agents (Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, Pegaptanib and Aflibercept) and application of treatment of NVG and anti-scarring in filtering surgery. The review also provided references for the clinical treatment of NVG and improving the success rate of operation.

The fixed combination efficacy assessment in patients with secondary neovascular glaucoma and diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE

To assess IOP-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination (Ganfort®) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and uncontrolled secondary neovascular glaucoma (NG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients (51 eyes) with uncontrolled secondary neovascular glaucoma and diabetes mellitus were enrolled in the study. All patients with an uncontrolled IOP have been proposed to switch current IOP-lowering therapy to Ganfort®. In case target IOP level was not reached filtration surgery was recommended. Ganfort® administration - once a day in the morning.

RESULTS

IOP-lowering has been observed in all patients when switched to Ganfort®. Mean IOP level was almost 3-x lower versus baseline in 72.5% of patients (37 eyes). The patients achieved target IOP of 15-17 mmHg. As a result, no surgical intervention was required. Significant IOP-lowering has been observed in another group of patients (14 eyes, 27.5 %) nevertheless due to glaucoma progression, these patients are still subjected to surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

IOP-lowering fixed combination Ganfort® (Allergan) can be used in patients with secondary neovascular glaucoma and diabetes mellitus as a drug of choice to control the IOP level. Even in cases when target IOP is not achieved, Ganfort® can be administered in pre-operative period and helps to reduce postoperative complications.

Intravitreal bevacizumab in acute central/hemicentral retinal vein occlusions: three-year results of a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB, Avastin; Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, CA) injections in patients with acute central/hemicentral retinal vein occlusions (C/HCRVOs) (≤1 month after the occlusion was diagnosed) over the course of 3 years.

METHODS

The study included 57 patients with unilateral acute C/HCRVOs. Initially, the treatment for acute C/HCRVO patients consisted of 4 consecutive IVB injections administered off-label at a dose of 2.5 mg per injection, with each injection spaced ∼45 days apart. Thereafter, IVB therapy was flexible, and subsequent injections were administered during scheduled visits whenever a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) loss of ≥5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters occurred and/or iris/angle neovascularization appeared (regardless of the intraocular pressure level). Changes in the BCVA and foveal thickness (FT), number of IVB injections administered, and incidence of neovascular glaucoma (NVG) were estimated.

RESULTS

The increase in the BCVA score at month 36 was 17.15 (ETDRS letters) (P<0.0001) in cases of nonischemic and 26.81 (ETDRS letters) (P<0.01) in cases of ischemic occlusions. At the end of the follow-up, the proportion of BCVA score improvements greater than 15 ETDRS letters was similar in patients with both forms of occlusions (measured in 45.5% of nonischemic and 45.8% of ischemic patients) (P=0.977). There were significant reductions in FT from baseline values to 230±40.50 μm (P=0.0001) in patients with nonischemic occlusions and 270±40.50 μm (P=0.0001) in patients with ischemic forms. There was a significant difference (P<0.03) in the number of IVB injections administered in patients with nonischemic C/HCRVOs (8.7±1.58) compared to patients with ischemic occlusions (9.7±1.78). NVG occurred in 2 cases of ischemic occlusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-year IVB therapy provided sustained vision and FT gains in most phakic patients with acute C/HCRVOs, making this treatment option a rational and viable therapeutic strategy. Bevacizumab was more effective in patients with ischemic occlusions who required a significantly higher number of injections.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a potentially blinding secondary glaucoma. It is caused by the formation of abnormal new blood vessels which prevent normal drainage of aqueous from the anterior segment of the eye. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are specific inhibitors of the primary mediators of neovascularization. Studies have reported the effectiveness of anti-VEGFs for the control of intraocular pressure (IOP) in NVG.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the IOP lowering effects of intraocular anti-VEGF agents to no anti-VEGF treatment, as an adjunct to existing modalities for the treatment of NVG.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE, (January 1950 to January 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2013), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to January 2013), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov/) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 11 January 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of people treated with anti-VEGF agents for NVG.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the search results for trials to be included in the review. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third author. Since no trial met our inclusion criteria, no assessment of risk of bias or meta-analysis was undertaken.

MAIN RESULTS

No RCTs were found that met the inclusion criteria for this review. Two RCTs of anti-VEGF agents for treating NVG were not included in the review due to the heterogeneity and uncontrolled assignment of adjunct treatments received by the study participants.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently available evidence is insufficient to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-VEGF treatments, such as intravitreal ranibizumab or bevacizumab, as an adjunct to conventional treatment in lowering IOP in NVG. Well designed RCTs are needed to address this issue, particularly trials that evaluate long-term (at least six months) benefits and risks since the effects of anti-VEGF agents may be short-term only. An RCT comparing anti-VEGF agents with no anti-VEGF agents taking into account the need for co-interventions, such as panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), glaucoma shunt procedures, cyclodestructive procedures, cataract surgery, and deep vitrectomy, could be of use to investigate the additional beneficial effect of anti-VEGF agents in treating NVG. Since decisions for when and which co-interventions should be used are based on clinical criteria, they would not be appropriate for randomization. However, the design of a study on this topic should aim to balance groups by stratification of co-intervention at time of randomization or by enrolling a sufficient number of participants to conduct subgroup analysis by co-interventions (ideally 15 participants per treatment group for each subgroup). Alternatively, the inclusion criteria for a trial could limit participants to those who receive the same co-intervention.

[Results in neovascular glaucoma treatment]

This report presents the results of a study on 34 patients with neovascular glaucoma. We analyse the difficulties and the results of the management of this severe form of glaucoma.

Angiogenesis and vascular endothelial growth factors in intraocular tumors

The role of angiogenesis in tumors appears obvious: without vessels, tumors cannot grow. However, the long-held belief that all human solid tumors are angiogenesis-dependent has been challenged by the universally disappointing results of anti-angiogenesis therapy in cancer. This may be explained by the fact that cooption of preexisting vasculature as a primary or secondary mechanism of tumor vascularization is more important than previously thought. Nevertheless, anti-angiogenesis therapy may play an important (adjuvant) role in the prevention of metastases of intraocular tumors (uveal melanoma and retinoblastoma). Antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy already plays an important role in the management of irradiation complications in tumor eyes.

Clinical factors related to recurrence of anterior segment neovascularization after treatment including intravitreal bevacizumab

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of clinical factors on the recurrence of anterior segment neovascularization after intravitreal bevacizumab injection.

DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series.

METHODS

Charts of 54 eyes of 54 consecutive patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab injections (1.25 mg) for the treatment of anterior segment neovascularization were reviewed. The mean follow-up period +/- standard deviation was 16 +/- 8 months (range, 4 to 31 months). For eyes with incomplete panretinal photocoagulation, additional retinal ablation was performed within 1 month after bevacizumab injection. Differences in clinical factors were compared between eyes with and without recurrence. Baseline clinical factors were age, gender, predisposing diagnosis, status and clinical stages of anterior segment neovascularization, fundus neovascularization, visual acuity, baseline intraocular pressure, previous retinal ablation, previous intraocular surgeries, lens status, history of glaucoma, hemoglobin A1c level, hypertension, and creatinine level. Factors after intravitreal bevacizumab administration were additional retinal ablation, intraocular surgeries, mean intraocular pressure until recurrence, and visual acuity. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the contribution of these factors to recurrence. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test was performed with recurrence as the end point.

RESULTS

Recurrence occurred in 26 (48%) eyes a mean +/- standard deviation of 4.7 +/- 3.0 months (range, 2 to 11 months) after bevacizumab injection. Multivariate analysis identified trabeculectomy after bevacizumab injection as the primary inhibitory factor for recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.094 to 0.55; P = .001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that trabeculectomy after bevacizumab injection provided a significantly better survival rate (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of anterior segment neovascularization after intravitreal bevacizumab injection occurs despite intensive retinal ablation: trabeculectomy may suppress recurrence.

Bevacizumab as adjuvant for neovascular glaucoma

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the longterm effects of intraocular bevacizumab (Avastin) injections as adjuvant treatment in patients with neovascular glaucoma.

METHODS

Twenty eyes of 18 consecutive patients with secondary neovascular glaucoma caused by proliferative diabetic retinopathy (n = 7), ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion (n = 7), ischaemic ophthalmopathy (n = 2) and retinal ischaemia resulting from persistent detachment (n = 2) were treated with intraocular bevacizumab injections (1.25 mg/0.05 ml) in addition to other treatments. The main outcome measure was the change in degree of iris rubeosis. Secondary outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and numbers of additional interventions or antiglaucoma medications administered after injection.

RESULTS

Mean (+/- standard deviation) follow-up was 67.7 +/- 13.8 weeks (range 50-93 weeks). At the last follow-up, complete regression of rubeosis was detectable in five (20%) eyes, incomplete regression in seven (35%), stabilization in six (30%), and an increase in two (10%) eyes. Mean IOP was 26.0 +/- 8.9 mmHg at baseline and significantly decreased to 14.75 +/- 5.3 mmHg at the last follow-up visit (p = 0.000005). Mean baseline BCVA (logMAR [logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution] 1.43 +/- 0.89) was stabilized during the follow-up period (logMAR 1.5 +/- 0.98). Patients received an average of 2.75 injections. Additional treatments were laser photocoagulation in 13 (65%) eyes, cyclodestructive procedure in 14 (70%), cryopexy in six (30%), drainage procedures in two (10%), and vitrectomy in five (25%) eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab may be beneficial as adjuvant treatment in neovascular glaucoma because of its anti-angiogenic properties and its ability to prevent establishment or progression of angular obstruction. The causative disease inducing the angiogenic process requires treatment in all cases. Antiglaucoma treatment is needed in cases of persistent elevated IOP.

Intravitreal bevacizumab for neovascular glaucoma

PURPOSE

To report 6-month and 1 year outcomes of eyes treated for neovascular glaucoma (NVG) with intravitreal bevacizumab injection and panretinal laser (PRP) compared to those receiving PRP alone.

DESIGN

retrospective, consecutive case series.

METHODS

Charts of patients with NVG from retinal ischemia and at least 6 months of follow-up were reviewed. Patients were treated with one injection of 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab followed by PRP or with PRP alone. The primary outcome was the long-term angle anatomy. Secondary measures included intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, patient compliance, and control of systemic diseases.

RESULTS

Fourteen eyes of 12 patients treated with bevacizumab and PRP and 15 eyes of 11 patients treated with PRP alone were included in the study. Mean sectors of open angle at baseline was 1.31 in the bevacizumab group and 1.47 in the retinal ablation group (P = 0.73). Mean sectors of open angle was 2.14 and 1.18 in the bevacizumab and retinal ablation groups, respectively (P < 0.05) at 6-month follow-up, and 2.27 and 1.18, respectively (P < 0.05) at 1-year follow-up. Mean baseline IOP was 32.3 mmHg (+/-14.8) in the bevacizumab group and 31.8 mmHg (+/-13) in the PRP group (P = 0.75). At 6-month follow-up, the mean IOP was 18.28 mmHg (+/-10) in the bevacizumab group and 23.33 mmHg (+/-14.6) in the PRP group (P = 0.05), and 19.12 mmHg (+/-6.8) and 26.2 mmHg (+/-18) (P = 0.1), respectively at 1-year follow-up. Nineteen patients were judged to be noncompliant, 10 had uncontrolled diabetes and 7 had uncontrolled hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents better long-term preservation of open angle and IOP control in eyes receiving bevacizumab along with PRP. We stress that NVG is still associated with poor visual acuity outcomes.

Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C for neovascular glaucoma: prognostic factors for surgical failure

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic factors for surgical outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) for neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 101 patients (101 eyes) with NVG treated at Kumamoto University Hospital. The primary endpoint was persistent intraocular pressure > or = 22 mm Hg, deterioration of visual acuity to no light perception, and additional glaucoma procedures. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 29.3 months (range, 0.5 to 142.3 months). The probability of success 1, 2, and 5 years after trabeculectomy was 62.6%, 58.2%, and 51.7%, respectively. The multivariate model showed that younger age (relative risk [RR], 0.96/year; P = .0007) and previous vitrectomy (RR, 1.62; P = .02) were prognostic factors for surgical failure among all NVG patients. Additionally, an eye with unremoved proliferative membrane and/or unrepaired retinal detachment (RD) after vitrectomy (RR, 1.59; P = .05) was a probable prognostic factor in a subgroup of 66 eyes with previous vitrectomy, and having a fellow eye with NVG (RR, 1.73; P = .003) was a significant prognostic factor in 82 eyes with NVG attributable to diabetic retinopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic factors for surgical failure of trabeculectomy with MMC for NVG were younger age and previous vitrectomy in all NVG patients, and having a fellow eye with NVG in patients with disease caused by diabetic retinopathy. Persistent proliferative membrane and/or RD after vitrectomy might contribute to poorer outcomes of trabeculectomy.

[The treatment of the rubeosis of the iris and the neovascular glaucoma in proliferative diabetic retinopathy by means of anti-VEGF]

The rubeosis of the iris is a serious complication especially in diabetic retinopathy and retinal veins occlusion. Cytokines, especially the vascular growing factor (VEGF), are responsible for the forming of new vessels. The treatment that inhibits the effect of the VEGF presents new possibilities in the neovascular diseases treatment. Bevacizumab (Avastin) is an anti-VEGF antibody that blocks all forms of VEGF-A. In three eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and neovascularization of the iris and the anterior chamber angle, the dose of 1.25 mg of Avastin was applied intravitrealy. Just one week after the application of the drug, the decrease of the leakage on the iris, and the total disappearance of the neovascularization in three weeks were visible on the fluorescein angiogram. The recurrence of the neovascularization was found in one eye after three months and the treatment had to be repeated. Nine months after the second application, the disease is stabilized without the neovascularization. The intraocular pressure was elevated in two eyes before the application of Avastin, and was refractive to the treatment. After the disappearance of the neovascularization, the intraocular pressure was normalized and it was possible to terminate the antiglaucomatous therapy. The bevacizumab intravitreal treatment of the neovascularization of the iris and the anterior chamber angle was proved to be efficient, the neovascularization disappeared and the intraocular pressure was normalized. There were no side effects after the bevacizumab applications in any of our patients.

Intravitreal bevacizumab for neovascular glaucoma

The aim of the study was to assess short-term efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab in a series of patients with neovascular glaucoma. Eleven patients with neovascular glaucoma and symptomatic elevation of intraocular pressure were treated with 1.25 mg/0.1 mL of bevacizumab. In three patients, intravitreal bevacizumab was administered preoperatively, one day before pars plana vitrectomy. Additional therapy was only performed if topical medication failed to result in satisfactory control of intraocular pressure. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 8 weeks. In all study patients, intravitreal application of bevacizumab resulted in marked regression of iris neovascularization within the first three postoperative days. Appropriate control of intraocular pressure was achieved in seven patients, whereas four patients required additional therapy for intraocular pressure regulation. No side effects of intravitreal bevacizumab were recorded. Thus, intravitreal bevacizumab seems to be a potent adjunct in the management of neovascular glaucoma. Additional studies of bevacizumab long-term safety and efficacy are warranted.

Surgical outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab and filtration surgery in neovascular glaucoma

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcome of a trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) in neovascular glaucoma after an adjunctive treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin(R); Genentech Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA) injection (IVB).

METHODS

Six patients with NVG presented at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand. After adequate panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and maximal antiglaucoma medication therapy, these patients received IVB (1.25 mg in 0.05 ml) due to persistent neovascularisation of the iris (NVI). A fornix-based conjunctival flap trabeculectomy with MMC was performed within 4 weeks following administration of IVB.

RESULTS

Three patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and three patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) were enrolled in the study (mean age, 57 years). Absolute regression of NVI was observed within 1 week after IVB in four patients. In two patients NVI was reduced but still persisted. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased from 39.8 mmHg pre-operatively to 7.5 mmHg on the first postoperative day. No intra-operative complications were noted. Two patients had postoperative hyphema, which resolved spontaneously within 1 week. During the mean follow up of 24.7 weeks, five patients had controlled IOP (range, 2-16 mmHg) without antiglaucoma medication. Two patients with PDR had improved visual acuity whereas two patients with CRVO lost pre-operative light perception. Recurrent NVI was subsequently detected in one patient who had uncontrolled IOP. This patient underwent transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation and additional PRP. All patients were symptom-free at last visit.

CONCLUSION

IVB is an effective modality to reduce intra-operative complications during trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma. The short-term outcomes following trabeculectomy with MMC are favourable.

Intraocular avastin (bevacizumab) for neovascularisation of the iris and neovascular glaucoma

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of intraocular injections of bevacizumab for neovascularisation of the iris and neovascular glaucoma.

CLINICAL PICTURE

Three patients with neovascularisation of the iris due to various causes were recruited.

TREATMENT

Patients were treated with intraocular bevacizumab.

OUTCOME

Neovascularisation of the iris was noted to have completely regressed as early as 3 days after the injection and in all the patients (100%) within 8 days after injection. They were followed up for at least 1 month with no clinical evidence of recurrence. Visual acuity remained stable or improved, and the intraocular pressure was controlled in all the 3 patients' eyes. Vitreous haemorrhage also cleared. No signs of inflammation or complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Intraocular injection of bevacizumab is effective and safe for patients with neovascularisation of the iris and neovascular glaucoma with or without vitreous haemorrhage.

Trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C in neovascular galucoma patients

We sought to determine the effectiveness of trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) in neovascular glaucoma (NVG) patients. Trabeculectomy with MMC in NVG patients is a method that has high rate of short-term success.

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) injection for neovascular glaucoma

Neovascular glaucoma is a secondary glaucoma with grave prognosis which follows ischemic retinal disorders in the majority of cases. Mediators that induce new vessel formation such as the vascular endothelial growth factor-A seem to play a key role in the pathophysiology of this condition. Herein, we report 2 cases with neovascular glaucoma secondary to ischemic central retinal vein occlusion who received treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) a nonselective antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor-A. Both patients demonstrated dramatic short-term response in terms of intraocular pressure reduction and regression of neovascularization.

Role of Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Neovascular Glaucoma

We report on the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma (NVG). A retrospective chart review of 6 consecutive cases of NVG was performed. The follow-up period was 3-19 months (average, 9.7 months). All patients received 1.25 mg (0.05 cc) of IVB followed by panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) approximately 1 week later. In all cases, there was a complete regression of iris and anterior chamber angle neovascularization. However, 2 eyes showed a recurrence of neovascularization; in 1 case, it recurred after 3 months, and in the second, after 5 months. These patients received another IVB injection followed by additional PRP, which resulted in the resolution of the recurrent neovascularization. Glaucoma was controlled with topical eye drops alone in patients who had iris and angle neovascularization without peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS). However, patients with PAS at the time of presentation needed subsequent glaucoma surgery. Our study suggests that IVB may be a valuable addition in the treatment of NVG by hastening the resolution of anterior segment neovascularization, improving the results of glaucoma surgeries, and appears to give long-term control when used in combination with PRP.

Bevacizumab (Avastin) for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma

Herein three cases of angle closure secondary to neovascularization (elevated intraocular pressure in two of the cases) treated with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (Avastin) are reported. In all three cases there was rapid resolution of neovascularization and control of intraocular pressure. One patient with corneal anaesthesia from diabetes developed infectious keratitis, potentially as a consequence of inhibition of VEGF wound healing and neurotrophic functions. Avastin appears to have a promising role in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma but is not without potential local and systemic side-effects.