Exposure, hazard, and vulnerability all contribute to Schistosoma haematobium re-infection in northern Senegal

Background

Infectious disease risk is driven by three interrelated components: exposure, hazard, and vulnerability. For schistosomiasis, exposure occurs through contact with water, which is often tied to daily activities. Water contact, however, does not imply risk unless the environmental hazard of snails and parasites is also present in the water. By increasing reliance on hazardous activities and environments, socio-economic vulnerability can hinder reductions in exposure to a hazard. We aimed to quantify the contributions of exposure, hazard, and vulnerability to the presence and intensity of Schistosoma haematobium re-infection.

Methodology/Principal findings

In 13 villages along the Senegal River, we collected parasitological data from 821 school-aged children, survey data from 411 households where those children resided, and ecological data from all 24 village water access sites. We fit mixed-effects logistic and negative binomial regressions with indices of exposure, hazard, and vulnerability as explanatory variables of Schistosoma haematobium presence and intensity, respectively, controlling for demographic variables. Using multi-model inference to calculate the relative importance of each component of risk, we found that hazard (Ʃw_{i =} 0.95) was the most important component of S. haematobium presence, followed by vulnerability (Ʃw_i = 0.91). Exposure (Ʃw_i = 1.00) was the most important component of S. haematobium intensity, followed by hazard (Ʃw_i = 0.77). Model averaging quantified associations between each infection outcome and indices of exposure, hazard, and vulnerability, revealing a positive association between hazard and infection presence (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.12, 1.97), and a positive association between exposure and infection intensity (RR 2.59–3.86, depending on the category; all 95% CIs above 1)

Conclusions/Significance

Our findings underscore the linkages between social (exposure and vulnerability) and environmental (hazard) processes in the acquisition and accumulation of S. haematobium infection. This approach highlights the importance of implementing both social and environmental interventions to complement mass drug administration.

While the impacts of natural hazards tend to be described in terms of social determinants such as exposure and vulnerability, the risk for infectious disease is often expressed in terms of environmental determinants without fully considering the socio-ecological processes that put people in contact with infective agents of disease. In the case of schistosomiasis, risk is determined by human interactions with freshwater environments where schistosome parasites circulate between people and aquatic snails. In this study, we quantified the relative contributions of exposure, hazard, and vulnerability to schistosome re-infection among schoolchildren in an endemic region of northern Senegal. We find that hazard and vulnerability influence whether a child becomes infected, while exposure and hazard influence the burden of worms once infection is acquired. Increasing numbers of worms is known to be positively associated with increasing severity of disease. Our findings underscore the importance of evaluating social and environmental determinants of disease simultaneously; omitting measures of exposure, hazard or vulnerability may limit our understanding of risk.

Context-dependent roles of B cells during intestinal helminth infection

The current approaches to reduce the burden of chronic helminth infections in endemic areas are adequate sanitation and periodic administration of deworming drugs. Yet, resistance against some deworming drugs and reinfection can still rapidly occur even after treatment. A vaccine against helminths would be an effective solution at preventing reinfection. However, vaccines against helminth parasites have yet to be successfully developed. While T helper cells and innate lymphoid cells have been established as important components of the protective type 2 response, the roles of B cells and antibodies remain the most controversial. Here, we review the roles of B cells during intestinal helminth infection. We discuss the potential factors that contribute to the context-specific roles for B cells in protection against diverse intestinal helminth parasite species, using evidence from well-defined murine model systems. Understanding the precise roles of B cells during resistance and susceptibility to helminth infection may offer a new perspective of type 2 protective immunity.