The economic impact of switching from Synthroid for the treatment of hypothyroidism

AIMS

To compare hypothyroidism-related costs for patients who continuously used Synthroid and patients who switched from Synthroid to alternative therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Truven's Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2014 was queried for US adults diagnosed with hypothyroidism who initiated Synthroid and adhered to such therapy for at least 6 months. Propensity score matching matched continuous users of Synthroid to patients who switched from Synthroid to alternative levothyroxine agents. Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed differences between the matched cohorts in several categories of costs, including disease-related drug costs, non-drug medical costs, and total direct medical costs.

RESULTS

There were 10,159 individuals included in the study, with 7,991 continuous users of Synthroid and 2,168 switchers. After matching (n = 2,052 for each cohort), continuous use of Synthroid was associated with significantly lower hypothyroidism-related non-drug medical costs ($595 vs $1,023; p = .003) and reduced hypothyroidism-related total medical costs ($757 vs $1,132; p = .010), despite being associated with significantly higher drug costs ($161 vs $109; p < .001). Hypothyroidism-related total medical costs rose as the number of switches of hypothyroidism treatment increased, with continuous users having significantly lower hypothyroidism-related total medical costs ($757) compared with patients who switched twice ($1,179; p = .001) or three or more times ($1,268; p = .004).

LIMITATIONS

The analyses focused on continuously insured patients who were adherent to Synthroid for at least 6 months and results may not be generalizable. The reliance on claims data does not allow for clinical examination of hypothyroidism or inclusion of some factors that may be associated with outcomes. The analyses assume that all prescriptions filled are taken as prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that there are significant direct economic healthcare costs associated with switching from Synthroid to alternative levothyroxine therapies, and that these costs increase as patients switch therapies more frequently.

The Economic Impact of Levothyroxine Dose Adjustments: the CONTROL HE Study

Background

In general, hypothyroidism can be adequately treated with a consistent daily dose of levothyroxine. However, the need for levothyroxine dose adjustments is frequent in clinical practice. The extent to which levothyroxine dose adjustments increase the utilization of healthcare resources has not previously been described in the clinical literature.

Objective

The primary objective of our study was to measure the effect of levothyroxine dose adjustments in terms of their utilization of healthcare resources including direct and indirect costs. A secondary goal was to identify any differences in patient characteristics that may be responsible for levothyroxine dose adjustments.

Methods

A retrospective medical chart review was conducted among patients of selected healthcare providers in the USA. Patients who were recently started on levothyroxine therapy (<6 months) were excluded to avoid situations that were more likely attributable to treatment initiation than inadequate therapeutic effect. Trained nurses extracted data from patient charts and electronic medical record systems for review. We analyzed the cost of resources consumed by the frequency of levothyroxine dose changes over 24 months: 0 dose changes (no dose adjustment group); one dose change, two dose changes, three or more dose changes (≥1 dose adjustment group).

Results

The study included 454 patients. Overall estimated resource utilization was higher per patient in the ≥1 dose adjustment group (US$5824) vs. the no dose adjustment group (US$3166) during the 24-month study period. When direct and indirect costs were combined, overall costs of care were greatest in patients requiring three or more dose adjustments (US$8220/patient). Patients in this cohort incurred 2.5-fold greater total costs compared with patients requiring no dose adjustments (US$8220 vs. US$3166). Among the 58 patients in the group requiring three or more dose adjustments, mean direct medical costs were significantly higher than in the patients requiring no dose adjustments (US$6387 vs. US$2182). Patients with at least one dose adjustment experienced a 40.3% increase in lost productivity vs. patients who had no dose adjustments (US$1381 vs. US$984). Loss of productivity was highest among patients with three or more levothyroxine dose adjustments. Among this cohort, there was an 86.4% increase in lost productivity vs. patients who had no levothyroxine dose adjustments (US$1833 vs. US$984).

Conclusions

Patients experiencing multiple levothyroxine dose adjustments were shown to consume more healthcare resources, resulting in higher costs than those who required no dose adjustments. Each care episode contributed to lost time and wages with total estimated lost productivity escalating with increasing levothyroxine dose adjustments over a 24-month period.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40261-016-0462-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Services provided by community pharmacies in Wayne County, Michigan: a comparison by ZIP code characteristics

OBJECTIVE

To document the availability of selected pharmacy services and out-of-pocket cost of medication throughout a diverse county in Michigan and to assess possible associations between availability of services and price of medication and characteristics of residents of the ZIP codes in which the pharmacies were located.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional telephone survey of pharmacies coupled with ZIP code-level census data.

SETTING

503 pharmacies throughout the 63 ZIP codes of Wayne County, MI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The out-of-pocket cost for a 30 days' supply of levothyroxine 50 mcg and brand-name atorvastatin (Lipitor-Pfizer) 20 mg, availability of discount generic drug programs, home delivery of medications, hours of pharmacy operation, and availability of pharmacy-based immunization services. Census data aggregated at the ZIP code level included race, annual household income, age, and number of residents per pharmacy.

RESULTS

The overall results per ZIP code showed that the average cost for levothyroxine was $10.01 ± $2.29 and $140.45 + $14.70 for Lipitor. Per ZIP code, the mean (± SD) percentages of pharmacies offering discount generic drug programs was 66.9% ± 15.0%; home delivery of medications was 44.5% ± 22.7%; and immunization for influenza was 46.7% ± 24.3% of pharmacies. The mean (± SD) hours of operation per pharmacy per ZIP code was 67.0 ± 25.2. ZIP codes with higher household income as well as higher percentage of residents being white had lower levothyroxine price, greater percentage of pharmacies offering discount generic drug programs, more hours of operation per week, and more pharmacy-based immunization services. The cost of Lipitor was not associated with any ZIP code characteristic.

CONCLUSION

Disparities in the cost of generic levothyroxine, the availability of services such as discount generic drug programs, hours of operation, and pharmacy-based immunization services are evident based on race and household income within this diverse metropolitan county.

Levothyroxine and lung cancer in females: the importance of oxidative stress

BACKGROUND

Levothyroxine (LT4) treatment can lead to iatrogenic hyperthyroidism and oxidative stress that can cause patient discomfort. Oxidative stress is also recognized as one of the causes of chronic diseases and cancer.

METHODS

The prevalence of breast, colorectal, gastric and lung cancer in 18 Italian Regions during 2010 was correlated with the sales of LT4 in 2009. The cancer prevalence was analyzed in women aged 30-84. This age range corresponds to more than 80% of the consumers of the drug and to about 99% of all malignant cancers. The correlation between sales of LT4 and cancers was determined with the technique of Density Ellipses. The age and smoking contribution for lung cancer was determined with the Sequential test.

RESULTS

No significant correlation was seen between LT4 sales and breast, colorectal and gastric cancers. A significant correlation was instead found for lung cancer (p<0.05) corrected for smoking and age.

CONCLUSIONS

LT4 consumption in Italy is about 0.7 boxes/women/year. There is a correlation between lung cancer and LT4 treatment and oxidative stress caused by LT4 supplementation can be one of the causes. Although we cannot exclude that dysthyroidism needing LT4 supplementation might be the ground for lung cancer itself and measuring oxidative stress could be helpful in avoiding excessive use of the drug.

Generic drug discount programs: are prescriptions being submitted for pharmacy benefit adjudication?

 

BACKGROUND

In 2006, pharmacies began offering select generic prescription drugs at discount prices (e.g., $4 for a 30-day supply) through nonmembership and membership programs. As part of the contract in membership generic drug discount programs, the member agrees to forgo submission of the claim to the insurance company. Claims not submitted for insurance adjudication may result in incomplete pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) and health plan data, which could negatively influence adherence reporting and clinical programs. To address potentially missing claims data, the Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services (CMS) encourages Medicare Part D sponsors to incentivize network pharmacies to submit claims directly to the plan for drugs dispensed outside of a member's Part D benefit, unless a member refuses. The extent of PBM and health plan claims capture loss due to generic drug discount programs is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To identify changes in levothyroxine utilizers' prescription claims capture rate following the advent of generic drug discount membership and nonmembership programs.

METHODS

This retrospective concurrent cohort study used claims data from 3.5 million commercially insured members enrolled in health plans located in the central and southern United States with Prime Therapeutics pharmacy benefit coverage. Members were required to be 18 years or older and younger than 60 years as of January 1, 2006, and continuously enrolled from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2010. Members utilizing generic levothyroxine for at least 120 days during January 1, 2006, through June 30, 2006 (baseline period) from the same pharmacy group with supply on July 1, 2006, were placed into 1 of 3 pharmacy groups: (1) nonmembership (Walmart, Sam's Club, Target, Kroger, City Market, and King Soopers pharmacies), (2) membership (Walgreens, CVS, Albertsons, and Savon pharmacies), or (3) the reference group of all other pharmacies. The index date was defined as July 1, 2006. The levothyroxine claim providing supply on July 1, 2006, was the index claim. Members with a Kmart pharmacy index claim were excluded, since the Kmart membership drug discount program began prior to July 1, 2006. Levothyroxine claims capture nonpersistency, defined as the occurrence of a claim supply end date prior to a 180-day gap, was the primary outcome variable and was assessed from July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2010 (follow-up period). The odds of levothyroxine claims capture nonpersistency by pharmacy group were assessed using a logistic regression analysis adjusted for the following covariates: age, gender, median income in the ZIP code of residence (binomial for ≤ $50,000 vs. greater than $50,000), switch to a brand levothyroxine product during the follow-up period, index levothyroxine claim supply of 90 days or more, and index levothyroxine claim member cost share per 30-day supply in tertiles (≤ $5.00, $5.01-$7.99, ≥ $8.00).

RESULTS

Of 2,632,855 eligible members aged 18 years or older, 13,427 met all study eligibility criteria. The baseline pharmacy groups were membership with 3,595 (26.8%), nonmembership with 1,919 (14.3%), and all other pharmacies with 7,913 (58.9%) members. The rates of levothyroxine claims capture persistency throughout the 4-year follow-up period were 85.4% for nonmembership (P = 0.593 vs. all other pharmacies), 77.7% for the membership group (P  less than  0.001 vs. all other pharmacies), and 85.9% for all other pharmacies. The Kaplan-Meier comparison of claims capture persistency found nearly identical claims capture loss for the nonmembership compared with all other pharmacies group, and when compared in a multivariate logistic regression model, there was no difference in the odds of levothyroxine claims capture over 4 years follow-up (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.88-1.16, P = 0.900). The membership generic drug discount programs (Walgreens, CVS, Alberstons, and Savon pharmacies) had a statistically significant 61% higher odds (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.45-1.79, P  less than  0.001) of levothyroxine claims capture nonpersistency. The onset of the difference between the membership group and the all other pharmacies group was temporally associated with the launch of the membership programs. In comparison to index levothyroxine member cost of ≤ $5.00 per 30-day supply, higher cost shares were associated with higher levothyroxine claims capture nonpersistency ($5.01 to $7.99 OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.52 and ≥ $8.00 OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.40-1.82).

CONCLUSIONS

Among levothyroxine utilizers in 2006 (prior to the advent of drug discount programs), those with claims from a pharmacy that subsequently implemented a nonmembership generic drug discount program did not appear to have a different rate of levothyroxine claims capture than members from the reference group when followed through June 2010. Utilizers with claims from a pharmacy that subsequently implemented a membership program had a significantly lower levothyroxine claims capture rate. Increasing index levothyroxine member cost was associated with higher levothyroxine claims capture loss. Because the analysis could not directly measure claims capture loss associated with members who switched to a new pharmacy group without presenting their insurance information (e.g., membership discount programs), further research is needed to confirm these findings.

O ensaio de tiroglobulina com melhor sensibilidade funcional enquanto os pacientes tomam L-T4 substituirá a tiroglobulina estimulada pelo TSH no seguimento dos pacientes com câncer diferenciado da tiróide?

O autor apresenta evidências recentes da literatura que mostram que ensaios de tiroglobulina sérica (sTg) com maior sensibilidade funcional apresentam a mesma qualidade que a obtenção da sTg estimulada por rhTSH ou hipotiroidismo, no seguimento de pacientes com câncer diferenciado de tiróide (CDT). Desta forma, propõe modificar a prática recomendada pelas diretrizes de sociedades internacionais para o seguimento desses pacientes (desenvolvidas enquanto os ensaios disponíveis apresentavam sensibilidade de 1 ng/mL), substituindo-se a obtenção da sTg estimulada por rhTSH ou hipotiroidismo pelo acompanhamento dos pacientes na vigência da terapia com L-T4 com a medida da sTg desde que se empreguem técnicas com sensibilidade funcional da ordem de 0,1-0,2 ng/mL.

Effects of restricting levothyroxine dosage strength availability

We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to assess whether hospital formulary restrictions involving limiting dosage strengths of levothyroxine affect physicians' ability to manage patients effectively and provide pharmacy cost savings in a tertiary care federal government research hospital. Thirty-three endocrinologists were randomly assigned to prescribe levothyroxine from a restrictive (dosage strengths of 25, 50, 100, 125, and 150 micrograms) or a nonrestrictive (dosage strengths of 25, 50, 75, 100, 112, 125, 150, 175, 200, and 300 micrograms) formulary through a central computer system. Their 241 respective outpatients' laboratory results and drug compliance were outcome measures. Achievement of treatment objectives was measured by thyroid function tests (free and total thyroxine, total triiodothyronine, thyrotropin), number of clinic visits, and compliance (survey method). Additional measures were drug distribution patterns, drug costs, and pharmacy inventory costs. Restriction of levothyroxine's dosage strength did not significantly alter therapeutic outcomes. However, the restricted formulary was associated with more complex dosing regimens, and resulted in no significant cost savings. It is not known whether such restriction would adversely affect the care of patients of nonspecialists. Prospective studies are required to verify presumed cost-containment measures before such measures are adopted for widespread application.

Screening for mild thyroid failure at the periodic health examination: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of periodic screening for mild thyroid failure by measurement of serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration.

DESIGN

Cost-utility analysis using a state-transition computer decision model that accounted for case finding, medical consequences of mild thyroid failure, and costs of care during 40 years of simulated follow-up.

SETTING

Periodic health examinations in offices of primary care physicians.

PATIENTS

Hypothetical cohorts of women and men screened every 5 years during the recommended periodic examination, beginning at age 35 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Adding the serum TSH assay to total serum cholesterol screening was compared to cholesterol screening alone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct medical costs from a societal perspective.

RESULTS

The cost-effectiveness of screening 35-year-old patients with a serum TSH assay every 5 years was $9223 per QALY for women and $22595 per QALY for men. The cost-effectiveness became more favorable when age at first screening was increased for both sexes and was always more favorable for women than men. Reduced progression to overt hypothyroidism and relief of symptoms increased QALYs, but did not substantially reduce direct medical costs. Finding hypercholesterolemia induced by mild thyroid failure reduced direct medical costs, but did not substantially increase QALYs. The cost of a TSH assay and the importance to patients of symptoms associated with thyroid failure were the most influential factors in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-effectiveness of screening for mild thyroid failure compares favorably with other generally accepted preventive medical practices. Physicians should consider measuring serum TSH concentration in patients aged 35 years and older undergoing routine periodic health examinations. The cost-effectiveness of screening is most favorable in elderly women.

Screening for mild thyroid failure at the periodic health examination: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of periodic screening for mild thyroid failure by measurement of serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration.

DESIGN

Cost-utility analysis using a state-transition computer decision model that accounted for case finding, medical consequences of mild thyroid failure, and costs of care during 40 years of simulated follow-up.

SETTING

Periodic health examinations in offices of primary care physicians.

PATIENTS

Hypothetical cohorts of women and men screened every 5 years during the recommended periodic examination, beginning at age 35 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Adding the serum TSH assay to total serum cholesterol screening was compared to cholesterol screening alone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct medical costs from a societal perspective.

RESULTS

The cost-effectiveness of screening 35-year-old patients with a serum TSH assay every 5 years was $9223 per QALY for women and $22595 per QALY for men. The cost-effectiveness became more favorable when age at first screening was increased for both sexes and was always more favorable for women than men. Reduced progression to overt hypothyroidism and relief of symptoms increased QALYs, but did not substantially reduce direct medical costs. Finding hypercholesterolemia induced by mild thyroid failure reduced direct medical costs, but did not substantially increase QALYs. The cost of a TSH assay and the importance to patients of symptoms associated with thyroid failure were the most influential factors in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-effectiveness of screening for mild thyroid failure compares favorably with other generally accepted preventive medical practices. Physicians should consider measuring serum TSH concentration in patients aged 35 years and older undergoing routine periodic health examinations. The cost-effectiveness of screening is most favorable in elderly women.