Wilms tumor 1 peptide vaccination combined with temozolomide against newly diagnosed glioblastoma: safety and impact on immunological response

To investigate the safety of combined Wilms tumor 1 peptide vaccination and temozolomide treatment of glioblastoma, a phase I clinical trial was designed. Seven patients with histological diagnosis of glioblastoma underwent concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide therapy. Patients first received Wilms tumor 1 peptide vaccination 1 week after the end of combined concurrent radio/temozolomide therapy, and administration was continued once per week for 7 weeks. Temozolomide maintenance was started and performed for up to 24 cycles, and the observation period for safety encompassed 6 weeks from the first administration of maintenance temozolomide. All patients showed good tolerability during the observation period. Skin disorders, such as grade 1/2 injection-site reactions, were observed in all seven patients. Although grade 3 lymphocytopenia potentially due to concurrent radio/temozolomide therapy was observed in five patients (71.4 %), no other grade 3/4 hematological or neurological toxicities were observed. No autoimmune reactions were observed. All patients are still alive, and six are on Wilms tumor 1 peptide vaccination without progression, yielding a progression-free survival from histological diagnosis of 5.2-49.1 months. Wilms tumor 1 peptide vaccination was stopped in one patient after 12 injections by the patient's request. The safety profile of the combined Wilms tumor 1 peptide vaccination and temozolomide therapy approach for treating glioblastoma was confirmed.

Phase I trial of Wilms' Tumor 1 (WT1) peptide vaccine with GM-CSF or CpG in patients with solid malignancy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of combinatorial use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG-ODN) as immunoenhancement adjuvants in Wilms' Tumor 1 (WT1) vaccine therapy for patients with solid malignancy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patients were placed into treatment groups as follows: WT1 peptide alone, WT1 peptide with GM-CSF (100 μg) and WT1 peptide with CpG-ODN (100 μg). HLA-A *2402 or *0201/*0206-restricted, WT1 peptide emulsified with Montanide ISA51 was injected intradermally every week for eight weeks. Toxicities were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 3.0. Tumor size, which was measured by computed tomography, was determined every four weeks. The responses were analyzed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

RESULTS

The protocol was well tolerated; only local erythema occurred at the WT1 vaccine injection site. The disease control rate of the groups treated with WT1 peptide alone (n=10), with combinatorial use of GM-CSF (n=8) and with combinatorial use of CpG-ODN (n=10), in the initial two months was 20%, 25% and 60%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Addition of GM-CSF or CpG-ODN to the WT1 peptide vaccine for patients with solid malignancy was safe and improved the effectiveness of clinical response.

A phase I/II trial of a WT1 (Wilms' tumor gene) peptide vaccine in patients with solid malignancy: safety assessment based on the phase I data

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a phase I study to investigate the safety of a weekly WT1 tumor vaccine therapy in patients with solid tumors that had been refractory to all other anti-cancer therapies.

METHODS

Skin-test-negative patients were intradermally injected weekly for 12 weeks with 3.0 mg of an HLA-A*2402-restricted modified 9-mer WT1 peptide emulsified in Montanide ISA51 adjuvant. We estimated the Bayesian posterior probability of the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 toxicity when receiving the weekly WT1 vaccination. This analysis provided the basis for making a decision to terminate the phase I study and switch to phase II. Moreover, we performed an exploratory assessment of the anti-tumor effects of WT1 treatment.

RESULTS

Ten patients received 114 vaccinations with WT1 on a weekly schedule. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. Based on the Bayesian approach, it was highly likely that the probability of grade 3 or 4 toxicity was below 20% (the posterior probability = 0.914). Fifteen grade 2 and two grade 1 toxicities were observed; all of these incidents, however, were determined by the Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee to be unrelated to the WT1 treatment. One patient exhibited a partial response; five additional patients had stable disease while receiving weekly WT1 treatment.

CONCLUSION

This paper confirms that the potential toxicities of the treatment schedule of weekly WT1 vaccination are acceptable and suggested a potential anti-tumor effect. Consequently, we validated the decision to continue to the phase II trial.

[WT1 peptide-based immunotherapy]

The Wilms' tumor gene WT1 is overexpressed in leukemia and various types of solid cancers and its product is a tumor rejection antigen. A phase I clinical trials of WT1 peptide-based cancer immunotherapy were performed with good clinical response but with only skin reaction at the injection sites of WT1 vaccine. Thus, WT1-targeting immunotherapy should be promissing.