1
|
Kristoffersen AE, Stub T, Nilsen JV, Nordberg JH, Broderstad AR, Wider B, Bjelland M. Exploring dietary changes and supplement use among cancer patients in Norway: prevalence, motivations, disclosure, information, and perceived risks and benefits: a cross sectional study. BMC Nutr 2024; 10:65. [PMID: 38671478 PMCID: PMC11055316 DOI: 10.1186/s40795-024-00872-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is the leading cause of death in Norway, with prostate, breast, lung, and colon cancers being the most prevalent types. Adopting a healthy and varied diet can help reduce cancer risk and recurrence. However, access to dietary counselling remains limited for cancer patients in Norway. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of dietary supplement use and dietary changes made by cancer patients and survivors. Additionally, it sought to explore the reason(s) for such practices, communication with healthcare providers, sources of information, and reported benefits and potential harms resulting from these changes and supplement use. METHODS Conducted in collaboration with the Norwegian Cancer Society (NCS), this online cross-sectional study targeted members of their user panel who had either current or previous cancer (n = 706). The study took place in September/October 2021, utilizing a modified cancer-specific version of the International Questionnaire to Measure Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q). Out of 468 participants (315 women and 153 men), 67.2% consented to participate. Between-group analyses were conducted using Pearson chi-square tests and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, while independent sample t-tests were applied for continuous variables. RESULTS The majority of the participants (97%) reported making changes to their diet (78%) and/or incorporating dietary supplements (73%) in response to their cancer diagnosis. The primary goal of these changes was to strengthen their body and immune system. Almost half of the participants (49%) reported that they found these changes beneficial and discussed them openly with their healthcare providers, with family physicians being the most common point of discussion (25%). Adverse effects were reported by only a few participants, mostly mild. Information about dietary changes and supplements was primarily sourced from the internet or healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights that most individuals affected by cancer attribute to dietary adjustment. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing adherence to dietary recommendations and using reliable sources of information. Additionally, the study highlights the potential, yet currently underutilized, role of healthcare professionals in initiating dialogues about dietary interventions to address any unmet needs of patients. Such proactive engagement may contribute to the promotion of reliable sources of information and the prevention of non-evidence-based and potentially harmful diets or supplement adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Trine Stub
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Johanna Hök Nordberg
- Regional Cancer Center Stockholm Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department Neurobiology, Care Sciences & Society, Division of Nursing & Department Physiology & Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Ragnhild Broderstad
- Center for Sami Health Research, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Clinic of Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Harstad, Norway
| | - Barbara Wider
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mora DC, Jong MC, Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Kristoffersen AE, Stub T. Response to "Physical activity and psychological support can replace "another pill" to manage cancer-related symptoms in children and adolescents diagnosed with cancer". BMC Complement Med Ther 2024; 24:171. [PMID: 38649945 PMCID: PMC11036622 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-024-04476-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dana C Mora
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, NAFKAM, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, 9037, Norway.
| | - Miek C Jong
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, NAFKAM, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, 9037, Norway
| | - Sara A Quandt
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Thomas A Arcury
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, NAFKAM, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, 9037, Norway
| | - Trine Stub
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, NAFKAM, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, 9037, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakandi K, Benebo FO, Hopstock LA, Stub T, Kristoffersen AE. Adherence to lifestyle recommendations among Norwegian cancer survivors and the impact of traditional and complementary medicine use: the Tromsø Study 2015-2016. BMC Complement Med Ther 2023; 23:292. [PMID: 37598174 PMCID: PMC10439550 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-023-04123-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adherence to healthy lifestyle recommendations has positive effects on cancer outcomes yet adherence is low among cancer survivors. Differences in adherence between women and men, phase of survivorship, and other factors that might increase adherence, like the use of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM), need to be explored. We aimed to study the adherence to national recommendations for a healthy diet (daily intake of ≥ 5 portions of fruit/vegetables), physical activity (150 min of moderate-intensity or 75 min of high-intensity/week), normal body mass index (BMI) (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), non-smoking, and low-risk alcohol consumption (women ≤ 10 g/day, men ≤ 20 g/day) among Norwegian cancer survivors and their associations with sex, the use of T&CM, and survivorship phase. METHODS We used logistic regression, independent sample t-test, and chi-square test to study self-reported (diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption) and measured (BMI) adherence in 1530 cancer survivors (40 years and above, participating in the population-based Tromsø Study conducted in 2015-2016 (65% attendance). We dichotomized all assessed lifestyle recommendations (adherence = 1 point, non-adherence = 0 points), and created a score for every recommendation (0-5 points). Adherence to individual lifestyle recommendations and the use of T&CM as well as the phase of survivorship was adjusted for sex, age, income, and living with a partner. RESULTS Adherence to recommendations was 7.5% for diet, 85.3% for physical activity, 30.5% for BMI, 89.3% for non-smoking, and 87.6% for alcohol consumption. In total 2.3% adhered to all five recommendations concurrently (mean score 2.96 [SD = 0.86]). Women adhered to more recommendations concurrently compared to men (3.03 [SD = 0.90] vs. 2.89 [SD = 0.80] points respectively, [p = .012]). In total, 31% reported the use of T&CM and there were no differences in adherence to individual lifestyle recommendations or concurrent adherence in overall T&CM use compared to non-use. Users of self-help techniques were more likely to adhere to the recommendations of diet (aOR 2.69, 95% CI 1.45-4.98) and physical activity (aOR 6.26, 95% CI 1.51-25.92). Users of traditional healers and users of more than one T&CM modality were less likely to adhere to the low-risk alcohol consumption recommendation, (aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.77, and aOR 0.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17, respectively) compared to T&CM non-users. Survivors with cancer previously (1162) had higher odds of adhering to the recommendation of diet (aOR 2.66, 95% CI 1.36-5.19) than survivors with cancer presently (n = 368), but not to other recommendations. CONCLUSION The health of cancer survivors can be improved through adherence to lifestyle recommendations, yet our study found partial adherence among survivors in Norway, in accordance with findings from other countries. Although overall T&CM use was not associated with higher adherence to lifestyle recommendations, differences in adherence were seen among individual modalities like the use of self-help techniques and traditional healers. Our results suggest the need for intensified follow-up of lifestyle with attention to male survivors and diet among all survivors throughout the cancer survivorship continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiwumulo Nakandi
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Faculty of Health Science, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, N-9037, Norway.
| | - Faith O Benebo
- Systems Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Laila A Hopstock
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Trine Stub
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Faculty of Health Science, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, N-9037, Norway
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Faculty of Health Science, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, N-9037, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mora DC, Jong MC, Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Kristoffersen AE, Stub T. Supportive care for cancer-related symptoms in pediatric oncology: a qualitative study among healthcare providers. BMC Complement Med Ther 2023; 23:104. [PMID: 37013571 PMCID: PMC10069108 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-023-03924-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to gain insight into the clinical experiences and perceptions that pediatric oncology experts, conventional healthcare providers, and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers in Norway, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States have with the use of supportive care, including CAM among children and adolescents with cancer. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured in-depth interviews (n = 22) with healthcare providers with clinical experience working with CAM and/or other supportive care among children and adolescents with cancer from five different countries. Participants were recruited through professional associations and personal networks. Systematic content analysis was used to delineate the main themes. The analysis resulted in three themes and six subthemes. RESULTS Most participants had over 10 years of professional practice. They mostly treated children and adolescents with leukemia who suffered from adverse effects of cancer treatment, such as nausea and poor appetite. Their priorities were to identify the parents' treatment goals and help the children with their daily complaints. Some modalities frequently used were acupuncture, massage, music, and play therapy. Parents received information about supplements and diets in line with their treatment philosophies. They received education from the providers to mitigate symptoms and improve the well-being of the child. CONCLUSIONS Clinical experiences of pediatric oncology experts, conventional health care providers, and CAM providers give an understanding of how supportive care modalities, including CAM, are perceived in the field and how they can be implemented as adaptational tools to manage adverse effects and to improve the quality of life of children diagnosed with cancer and the families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana C Mora
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Faculty of Health Science, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, N-9037, Norway.
| | - Miek C Jong
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Faculty of Health Science, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, N-9037, Norway
| | - Sara A Quandt
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Thomas A Arcury
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Faculty of Health Science, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, N-9037, Norway
| | - Trine Stub
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Faculty of Health Science, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, N-9037, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nakandi K, Stub T, Kristoffersen AE. Clinical associations for traditional and complementary medicine use among norwegian cancer survivors in the seventh survey of the Tromsø study: a cross-sectional study. BMC Complement Med Ther 2023; 23:70. [PMID: 36871025 PMCID: PMC9985214 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-023-03896-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer survivors are a diverse group with varying needs that are patient-, disease-, and/or treatment-specific. Cancer survivors have reported supplementing conventional anti-cancer treatment with Traditional and Complementary Medicine (T&CM). Although female cancer survivors are reported to have more severe anticancer adverse effects, little is known about the association between anticancer treatment and T&CM use among Norwegian cancer survivors. The aims of this study are therefore to investigate (1) associations between cancer diagnosis characteristics and T&CM utilization and (2) associations between anticancer treatment and T&CM utilization among cancer survivors in the seventh survey of the Tromsø study. METHODS Data was collected from the seventh survey of the Tromsø Study conducted in 2015-16 among all inhabitants of Tromsø municipality aged 40 and above (response rate 65%), where inhabitants received online and paper form questionnaires. Data from the data linkage to the Cancer Registry of Norway for cancer diagnosis characteristics was also used. The final study sample was made up of 1307 participants with a cancer diagnosis. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test while independent sample t-test was used to compare continuous variables. RESULTS The use of T&CM the preceding 12 months was reported by 31.2% of the participants with natural remedies as the most reported modality of T&CM (18.2%, n = 238), followed by self-help practices of meditation, yoga, qigong, or tai chi, which was reported by 8.7% (n = 114). Users of T&CM were significantly younger (p = .001) and more likely to be female (p < .001) than the non-users, with higher use of T&CM among female survivors with poor self-reported health and being 1-5 years post-diagnosis. Lower use of T&CM was found among female survivors who received a combination of surgery with hormone therapy and those who received a combination of surgery with hormone therapy and radiotherapy. Similar usage was seen in male survivors, but not at a significant level. For both male and female survivors, T&CM was most frequently used by those with only one cancer diagnosis (p = .046). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that the profile of the Norwegian cancer survivor who uses T&M is slightly changing compared to previous findings. Additionally, compared to male survivors, more clinical factors are associated with use of T&CM among female cancer survivors. These results should serve as a reminder to conventional health care providers to discuss the use of T&CM with patients across the entire cancer survivorship continuum to promote safe use, especially among female survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiwumulo Nakandi
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Faculty of Health Science, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Trine Stub
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Faculty of Health Science, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Faculty of Health Science, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mora DC, Kristoffersen AE, Jong MC, Hervik JA, Stub T. A Qualitative Study Among Healthcare Providers on Risks Associated With the Use of Supportive Care for Cancer Treatment-Related Symptoms in Children and Adolescents. Integr Cancer Ther 2023; 22:15347354231192959. [PMID: 37551913 PMCID: PMC10411284 DOI: 10.1177/15347354231192959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although more than 300 000 children and adolescents worldwide are diagnosed with cancer yearly, little research has been conducted investigating how healthcare providers consider risk and patient safety connected with supportive care (including complementary and alternative medicine [CAM]) in this age group. This study aimed to explore how different healthcare providers perceive and evaluate risk when patients combine supportive care and conventional medicine in clinical practice and how they communicate and inform parents about the use of these modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 healthcare providers with expertise in treating pediatric oncology patients from 5 countries. Systematic content analysis was conducted using Nvivo 1.61. RESULTS The analysis resulted in 3 themes and 8 subthemes. Generally, participants were cautious about implementing unproven new modalities or therapies when recommending supporting care modalities to parents of children and adolescents with cancer. The most important criterion when recommending a modality was evidence for safety based on a risk/benefit evaluation. Negative interactions with conventional medicine were avoided by using the half-life of a drug approach (the time it takes for the amount of a drug's active substance in the body to reduce by half). For patients with severe symptoms, less invasive modalities were used (ear seeds instead of ear needling). To enhance safety, participants practiced open and egalitarian communication with parents. CONCLUSION Healthcare providers reported using a variety of approaches to achieve a safe practice when parents wanted to combine supportive care and conventional cancer treatment. They emphasized that these modalities should be foremost safe and not become an extra burden for the patients. Providers highlighted patient-centered care to meet the individual's specific health needs and desired health outcomes. A lack of national and regional standardized training programs for supportive care in pediatric oncology was considered a hazard to patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana C. Mora
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Miek C. Jong
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Trine Stub
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kristoffersen AE, Wider B, Nilsen JV, Bjelland M, Mora DC, Nordberg JH, Broderstad AR, Nakandi K, Stub T. Prevalence of late and long-term effects of cancer (treatment) and use of complementary and alternative medicine in Norway. BMC Complement Med Ther 2022; 22:322. [PMID: 36471296 PMCID: PMC9721050 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-022-03790-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing number of patients surviving cancer leads to more people experiencing late and long term-effects from the disease and its treatment. Fatigue, sleep disorders, early menopause, pain, and nerve damage are commonly reported. Methods helping people to recover after cancer treatment are therefore essential. The aims of this study were threefold; (1) to determine the level of cancer patients suffering from late and long-term effects of cancer diagnosis and treatment in Norway, (2) explore complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) modalities used for managing these adversities, and (3) describe self-perceived benefits and harms of the CAM interventions. METHODS The study was conducted in cooperation with the Norwegian Cancer Society (NCS) and consisted of an online cross-sectional study among members of the NCS user panel with present or previous cancer (n = 706). The study was carried out in September/October 2021 using a modified cancer-specific version of the International Questionnaire to Measure Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q). A total of 315 women and 153 men agreed to participate, resulting in a response rate of 67%. RESULTS Most of the participants (83%) suffered from late and long-term effects of cancer treatment; mostly fatigue (59.2%), sleep disorder (41.5%), hot flashes (39.2%), nerve damage (polyneuropathy, 38.0%), and pain (36.6%) with a mean number of 5.1 different late and long-term effects. Late and long-term effects were positively associated with younger age and college/university education. Nearly half of the participants experiencing late and long-term effects (43%) reported having used CAM to treat these complaints. Most frequently used were self-help practices (26%) such as relaxation therapy (19%), yoga (14%) and meditation (13%), but also visits to CAM providers were reported by 22%. Herbal- and other natural remedies to treat late and long-term effects were used by 13%. A high percentage of CAM users reported self-perceived improvements of their symptoms (86% for self-help practices, 90% for visits to CAM providers). Few experienced adverse effects of the CAM treatment. CONCLUSION A large proportion of cancer patients suffered from a wide range of late and long-term effects of cancer diagnosis and treatment, and they use CAM to treat these complaints to a rather high degree. Relaxation therapy, yoga, meditation, massage, and acupuncture were the most frequently used therapies regardless of complaint. The therapies used are generally considered to be both safe and beneficial for the respective complaint, indicating that the participants seem to be well informed about the choices they make.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnete E. Kristoffersen
- grid.10919.300000000122595234National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Barbara Wider
- grid.10919.300000000122595234National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Jorunn V. Nilsen
- grid.454853.b0000 0000 9990 0607The Norwegian Cancer Society, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mona Bjelland
- grid.454853.b0000 0000 9990 0607The Norwegian Cancer Society, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dana C. Mora
- grid.10919.300000000122595234National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Johanna Hök Nordberg
- Regional Cancer Center Stockholm Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden ,grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences & Society, Division of Nursing & Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Ragnhild Broderstad
- grid.10919.300000000122595234Centre for Sami Health Research, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kiwumulo Nakandi
- grid.10919.300000000122595234National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Trine Stub
- grid.10919.300000000122595234National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kristoffersen AE, Nilsen JV, Stub T, Nordberg JH, Wider B, Mora D, Nakandi K, Bjelland M. Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the context of cancer; prevalence, reasons for use, disclosure, information received, risks and benefits reported by people with cancer in Norway. BMC Complement Med Ther 2022; 22:202. [PMID: 35906578 PMCID: PMC9336131 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-022-03606-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Research exploring the use of specific Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) modalities by Norwegian cancer patients is sparse. The aims of this study were therefor to map the different CAM modalities cancer patients use and further investigate their rationale for use, communication about use, self-reported benefits and harms, and their sources of information about the different modalities.
Methods
In cooperation with the Norwegian Cancer Society (NCS), we conducted an online cross-sectional study among members of their user panel with present or previously cancer (n = 706). The study was carried out in September/October 2021 using a modified cancer-specific version of the International Questionnaire to Measure Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q). In total, 468 members, 315 women and 153 men, agreed to participate resulting in a response rate of 67.2%. The study was reported in accordance with the National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine’s (NAFKAM) model of reporting CAM use.
Results
A large proportion of the participants (79%, n = 346) had used some form of CAM with a mean of 3.8 modalities each (range 1-17); 33% (n = 143) had seen a CAM provider, 52% (n = 230) had used natural remedies, while 58% (n = 253) had used self-help practices. Most of the participants used CAM to increase their quality of life, cope with the cancer disease or for relaxation/well-being (64%-94%), mostly with high satisfaction and low rates of adverse effects. Few used CAM to treat cancer or prevent it from spreading (16%, n = 55). The main information sources were health care providers (47%), the internet (47%), and family and friends (39%). More than half (59%) of the cancer patients discussed their use of at least one CAM modality with a physician.
Conclusions
The results of this survey will provide health professionals with more in-depth insight into the patterns of CAM use by cancer patients and facilitate better-informed discussions with their patients. Considering the high use of CAM, reliable information provision supporting cancer care providers’ knowledge and health literacy among patients as well as good communication are crucial. The cooperation between the NCS and NAFKAM provides an example of how to address these issues.
Collapse
|
9
|
Stub T, Irgens AC, Hansen AH, Knudsen-Baas O, Gåskjenn C, Kristoffersen AE. Impact of spiritual healing on moderate depression in adults: a study protocol of a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062683. [PMID: 36109024 PMCID: PMC9478841 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Depression is a common mental disorder and the (global) leading cause of all non-fatal burden of disease worldwide. Currently, supported treatment for depression is antidepressant medication and different psychotherapeutic interventions. Many patients experience, however, adverse effects of antidepressant medication, while at the same time the access to psychotherapeutic interventions are limited. Many patients who suffer from depression turn to complementary medicine and among those modalities often spiritual healing. There is some evidence that consulting a spiritual healer can be beneficial for patients who suffer from depression, and that spiritual healing is associated with low risk. The aim of this protocol is to conduct a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) (spiritual healing as addition to usual care vs usual care alone) in preparation of a larger trial in adults with moderate depression, to examine feasibility and individuals' experience of spiritual healing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is a pilot RCT with two parallel groups. A total of 28 adult patients with moderate depression, diagnosed by the physician and according to the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale criteria will be randomised to spiritual healing in addition to usual care (n=14) or usual care alone (n=14). To determine if there is a statistical indication of an effect of healing warranting a full-scale study; the separation test will be used. To investigate participants' experience with spiritual healing, a qualitative study will be included using semistructured interviews. The data will be analysed based on a direct content analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This protocol was approved by regional committees for medical and health research ethics by the identifier (63692). The results will be disseminated through open-access, peer-reviewed publications, in addition to stakeholders' reporting and presenting at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION Norwegian Centre for Research Data (845302) and clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT04766242).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Stub
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Tromso, Norway
| | | | - Anne Helen Hansen
- University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Olav Knudsen-Baas
- Department of Psychiatry, Sørlandet sykehus HF Arendal, Arendal, Norway
| | | | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Tromso, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jong MC, Mulder E, Kristoffersen AE, Stub T, Dahlqvist H, Viitasara E, Lown EA, Schats W, Jong M. Protocol of a mixed-method randomised controlled pilot study evaluating a wilderness programme for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: the WAYA study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061502. [PMID: 35534081 PMCID: PMC9086645 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The majority of childhood, adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors suffer from long-term and late effects such as fatigue, psychological distress or comorbid diseases. Effective health promotion strategies are needed to support the health of this vulnerable group. This protocol provides a methodological description of a study that aims to examine the feasibility and safety of performing a randomised clinical trial (RCT) on a wilderness programme that is developed to support the health of AYA cancer survivors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The pilot RCT study has a mixed-method design, including quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Participants are AYAs, aged 16-39 years, that have been diagnosed with cancer during childhood, adolescence or young adulthood. A total of 40 participants will be randomly assigned to a wilderness programme (n=20) or a holiday programme (n=20). Both arms include participation in an 8-day summer programme, followed by a 4-day programme 3 months later. Primary outcomes are feasibility and safety parameters such as time to recruitment, willingness to be randomised, programme adherence and adverse effects. Secondary outcomes include self-reported health such as self-esteem, quality of life, self-efficacy and lived experiences. Descriptive statistics will be used to analyse outcomes and explore indications of differences between the programmes. Interviews are analysed by directed content analysis and hermeneutic phenomenology. A convergent parallel mixed-method analysis design will be applied to integrate quantitative and qualitative data. Results of this feasibility study will inform the preparation for a larger RCT with AYA cancer survivors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (reference: 2020-00239). This study will be performed between January 2021 and December 2023. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and disseminated to participants, cancer societies, healthcare professionals and outdoor instructors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04761042.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miek C Jong
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
| | - Eric Mulder
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Trine Stub
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Heléne Dahlqvist
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
| | - Eija Viitasara
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
| | - E Anne Lown
- Department of Social Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Winnie Schats
- Scientific Information Service, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mats Jong
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mora DC, Overvåg G, Jong MC, Kristoffersen AE, Stavleu DC, Liu J, Stub T. Complementary and alternative medicine modalities used to treat adverse effects of anti-cancer treatment among children and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Complement Med Ther 2022; 22:97. [PMID: 35366871 PMCID: PMC8976304 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-022-03537-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dealing with the symptom burden of cancer diagnosis and treatment has led parents to seek different self-management strategies including Alternative and Complementary Medicine (CAM). The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis about the use and effect of CAM modalities to treat adverse effects of conventional cancer treatment among children and young adults. Methods Six scientific research databases were used to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1990 to September 2020. Included studies investigated the use of CAM to treat cancer treatment related adverse effects in children and young adults compared to controls. Results Twenty RCTs comprising 1,069 participants were included in this review. The included studies investigated acupuncture, mind–body therapies, supplements, and vitamins for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), oral mucositis, and anxiety among children and young adults who underwent conventional cancer treatment. Seven studies (315 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect of CAM (including acupuncture and hypnosis only) on chemotherapy-induced nausea and/or vomiting and controls was statistically significant with a standard mean difference of -0.54, 95% CI [-0.77, -0.31] I2 = 0% (p < 0.00001). There was a significant difference between acupuncture and controls (n = 5) for intensity and/or episodes of CINV with an SMD -0.59, 95% CI [-0.85, -0.33] (p < 0.00001). No significant difference was found between hypnosis and controls (n = 2) for severity or episodes of CINV with an SMD -0.41, 95% CI [-1.09, 0.27] I2 = 41% (p = 0.19). Conclusion Current evidence from this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials shows that CAM, including acupuncture and hypnosis only, is effective in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children and young adults. More rigorous trials and long-term effects should be investigated if acupuncture and hypnosis are to be recommended for clinical use. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-022-03537-w.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kristoffersen AE, van der Werf ET, Stub T, Musial F, Wider B, Jong MC, Wode K, Danell JAB, Busch M, Hoenders HJR, Nordberg JH. Consultations with health care providers and use of self-management strategies for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 related symptoms. A population based cross-sectional study in Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands. Complement Ther Med 2022; 64:102792. [PMID: 34826590 PMCID: PMC8609665 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The present study was initiated to determine consultations with health care providers and use of self-management strategies for prevention or treatment of COVID-19 related symptoms in countries with a full lockdown (Norway), a partial lockdown (the Netherlands) and no lockdown (Sweden) during the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and if such use correlates with worries of being infected by COVID-19 disease. DESIGN Data were collected in collaboration with Ipsos A/S in April-June 2020. An adapted version of the International Questionnaire to measure use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (I-CAM-Q) was used with the categories "for prevention of COVID-19" and "to treat COVID-19-related symptoms" added. Data were collected among a representative sample in Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands using data assisted telephone interviews (Norway, n=990 and Sweden, n=500), and an online survey (the Netherlands, n=1004). Total response rate was 30%. RESULTS Very few consulted a health care provider with the intention to treat or prevent COVID-19 (1.2% and 1.0% respectively) with medical doctors mostly visited (1.0% and 0.9% respectively). Similarly, the use of self-management strategies to prevent or treat COVID-19 was low (3.4% and 0.2% respectively); most commonly used for prevention of COVID-19 were vitamins and minerals (2.8%). Consultations with health care providers and use of self-management strategies for prevention of COVID-19 were positively associated with worries of being infected with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic does not seem to have evoked a large-scale difference in behavior related to consultations with health care providers or the use of self-management strategies in any of the three countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Esther T van der Werf
- Louis Bolk Institute, Bunnik, the Netherlands; The Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health (CIZG), the Netherlands
| | - Trine Stub
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Frauke Musial
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Barbara Wider
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Miek C Jong
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kathrin Wode
- Regional Cancer Center Stockholm Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden; Department Radiation Sciences Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Martine Busch
- The Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health (CIZG), the Netherlands; Van Praag Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H J Rogier Hoenders
- The Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health (CIZG), the Netherlands; Center for Integrative Psychiatry, Lentis, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna H Nordberg
- Regional Cancer Center Stockholm Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences & Society, Divison of Nursing & Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mulder LTC, Busch M, Kristoffersen AE, Hök Nordberg J, van der Werf ET. Prevalence and predictive factors of complementary medicine use during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 in the Netherlands. BMC Complement Med Ther 2022; 22:43. [PMID: 35168630 PMCID: PMC8845358 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-022-03528-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Major life changing events such as the COVID-19 pandemic may have major impact on one’s health and general well-being. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictive factors, including gender specific differences, of Complementary Medicine (CM) use (including CM consultations, self-care management and self-help techniques) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 in the Netherlands. Methods CM use was studied among a random representative sample (n = 1004) of the adult Dutch population using an online survey conducted from 22–27 May 2020. The survey included a modified version of I-CAM-Q and additional questions on demographic characteristics, reasons for CM use, perceived effectiveness and side effects. Results 68.0% of the participants reported to have used CM (CM consultations (13.3%), self-management strategies (59.4%), self-help techniques (30.0%)). Most frequently reported reason of CM use was to improve general well-being (61.6%), prevention and/or treatment of COVID-19 was only reported by 10%. Perceived effectiveness of CM was high and number of experienced side effects low. Being a women, worried to get infected with COVID-19, higher education and living in northern/ middle region of the Netherlands were predictive factors to use CM. Conclusions In the Netherlands, specific groups (e.g. women/ highly educated) use CM, mainly to improve general wellbeing, and seem to benefit of it during the first months of the pandemic. The high perceived effectiveness and low reporting of side effects should encourage medical professionals and policy makers for more openness towards considering CM as being part of an integrative approach to public health in times life changing events occur. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-022-03528-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise T C Mulder
- Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981 AJ, Bunnik, The Netherlands
| | - Martine Busch
- Van Praag Institute, Springweg 7, 3511 VH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Dutch Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health (CIZG), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Centre in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Johanna Hök Nordberg
- Regional Cancer Centre Stockholm Gotland, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department Neurobiology, Care Sciences & Society, Division of Nursing & Department Physiology & Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Esther T van der Werf
- Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981 AJ, Bunnik, The Netherlands. .,Dutch Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health (CIZG), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nakandi K, Mora D, Stub T, Kristoffersen AE. Conventional health care service utilization among cancer survivors that visit traditional and complementary providers in the Tromsø study: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:53. [PMID: 35016666 PMCID: PMC8751219 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07445-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) is commonly used among cancer patients worldwide. Cancer patients in Norway mainly visit T&CM providers in addition to conventional health care services. It is not known how their utilization of T&CM providers influences their use of conventional health care services. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference between the utilization of conventional health care services among cancer survivors that visit T&CM providers and those that do not, and their associated factors. Method Health care service utilization data were obtained from cancer survivors 40 years and above participating in the Tromsø Study: Tromsø 7 conducted in 2015–2016. Data were collected from self-administered questionnaires. Pearson chi-square tests, Fisher exact tests, t-test, and logistic regression were used, with the significance level considered at p < 0.05. Results Of 1553 individuals, 10% (n = 155) reported visiting T&CM providers in the past 12 months. As both cancer survivors visiting and not visiting T&CM providers were frequent users of conventional health care, no significant differences were found in the overall use of conventional health care (98.1vs.94.5%, p = .056). Users of T&CM providers were however more likely to visit physiotherapists (40.1% vs 25%, p < .001), emergency rooms (29.2% vs 16.5%, p < .001), chiropractors (17% vs 6%, p < .001), and psychologist/psychiatrist (8.9% vs 3.4%, p < .001). They also had more frequent visits to conventional health care (11.45 vs 8.31 yearly visits, p = 0.014), particularly to general practitioners (5.21 visits vs. 3.94 visits, p = .002). Conclusion Results from this study show that visits to T&CM providers are associated with more visits to conventional health care services among cancer survivors. Further studies are needed to investigate the reasons for this high use behavior.
Collapse
|
15
|
Mora DC, Kristoffersen AE, Overvåg G, Jong MC, Mentink M, Liu J, Stub T. Safety of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) treatment among children and young adults who suffer from adverse effects of conventional cancer treatment: A systematic review. Integr Cancer Ther 2022; 21:15347354221105563. [PMID: 35726681 PMCID: PMC9218455 DOI: 10.1177/15347354221105563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is widely used around the world to treat adverse effects derived from cancer treatment among children and young adults. Parents often seek CAM to restore and maintain the child’s physical and emotional condition during and after cancer treatment. Objectives: The objectives of this review were (i) to identify literature that investigates CAM use for treating adverse effects of conventional cancer treatment, (ii) to investigate the safety of the included CAM modalities, and (iii) to evaluate the quality of included studies. Methods: Five scientific research databases were used to identify observational, quasi-experimental, and qualitative studies from January 1990 to May 2021. Included studies investigated the use of CAM to treat adverse effects of cancer treatment in childhood cancer. Results: Fifteen studies were included in this review. Ten quasi-experimental, 3 observational studies (longitudinal/prospective), 2 qualitative studies, and 1 study with a quasi-experimental and qualitative arm were identified. Less than half (n = 6; 40%) of the studies included reported adverse effects for the CAM modality being studied. Among the studies that reported adverse effects, they were mostly considered as direct risk, as 13% reported mainly bleeding and bruising upon acupuncture treatment, and dizziness with yoga treatment. All adverse effects were assessed as minor and transient. CAM modalities identified for treating adverse effects of cancer treatment were alternative medical systems, manipulative and body-based therapies, biologically-based therapies, and mind-body therapies. CAM modalities were used to alleviate anxiety, pain, toxicity, prevent trauma, and improve health-related quality of life, functional mobility, and physical activity levels. All studies assessed scored 70% or above according to the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal for study quality checklists. Conclusion: Most of the studies (58.3%) included in this review did not report adverse effects from CAM modalities used to treat adverse effects of cancer treatment in children and young adults. This lack of safety information is of concern because parents need to know whether the modality represents an extra burden or harm to the child. To improve awareness about safety in the field, a universal and uniform reporting system for adverse effects in CAM research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana C Mora
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | | | - Miek C Jong
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Marit Mentink
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jianping Liu
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and Pharmacology, Beijing, China
| | - Trine Stub
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stub T, Jong MC, Kristoffersen AE. The impact of COVID-19 on complementary and alternative medicine providers: a cross-sectional survey in Norway. Adv Integr Med 2021; 8:247-255. [PMID: 34395188 PMCID: PMC8356726 DOI: 10.1016/j.aimed.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background The Norwegian authorities decided in March 2020 to implement a nationwide lockdown to prevent spread of the COVID-19 virus. The lockdown had vast socioeconomic consequences for the society. The aim of this study was to investigate how COVID-19 affected Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) providers’ practice, financial situation, recommendations to patients, and how they perceived their future practice as CAM providers. Method Data were collected in this cross-sectional survey using a self-administrated electronic questionnaire. A total of 581 CAM providers completed the questionnaire, which was designed to describe consequences for CAM providers and their clinical practice caused by the nationwide lockdown. Descriptive statistics were carried out using frequency analyses to describe the demographics and consequences of the lockdown. Between group differences (gender and age) were analyzed using Pearson chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables, and ANOVA tests and t-tests for continuous variables. Significance level was defined as p < 0.05 without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Result During the nationwide lockdown of Norway, 38.4% of the respondents were able to provide CAM treatment to their patients. Of those, the majority (96.4%) had reorganized their clinical practice in accordance with COVID-19 hygiene regulations, offered video consultations (57.4%) or telephone consultations (46.6%). To manage financially during the lockdown, half of the providers spent their savings (48.7%). More than one third (35.1%) was supported by their partner, and 26.7% received compensation from the Norwegian state. A total of 26.3% of the CAM providers had other paid work that provided them with income. Nearly a fifth (18.6%) borrowed money from friends and family, changed their loan terms, or took out new bank loans. More than half (62.7%) expressed uncertainty about the future of their practice. CAM providers who had reorganized their practice to online consultations were more optimistic. Conclusion The impact of COVID-19 on CAM providers was considerable. It adversely affected their clinical practice, financial situation, and view on their future practice. To ensure that the health needs of the Norwegian population regarding CAM use are met during pandemic times like COVID-19, it is recommended to support and train CAM providers in the development of online CAM services, as well as efficient implementation of infection prevention and control measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Stub
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Miek C Jong
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stub T, Quandt SA, Kristoffersen AE, Jong MC, Arcury TA. Communication and information needs about complementary and alternative medicine: a qualitative study of parents of children with cancer. BMC Complement Med Ther 2021; 21:85. [PMID: 33685422 PMCID: PMC7938468 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-021-03253-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many parents choose support such as Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) for themselves and their children who have cancer. The aim of this paper is to describe, how parents who have children with cancer communicated with conventional health care providers about CAM, and what types and sources of information they would like to receive about CAM when the child was ill. METHOD This focused ethnography draws from in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted with 22 families in Norway with 24 adult participants (two couples), including two individuals who had had cancer themselves. Four domains were explored in the data analysis: the use of CAM, advice from laypeople about CAM, communication with conventional health care providers about CAM, and parents' information needs about CAM. RESULTS Many of the participants had personal experiences with CAM before the child received the cancer diagnosis. The health care providers did not raise the question about CAM in the consultations. However, when the parents raised the question, they were mostly met in a positive way. The participants did not receive any information about CAM at the hospital, which they would have appreciated. Instead, they received recommendations about CAM from laypersons, which were mostly rejected, as the advice was not in line with their health values/philosophy. CONCLUSION The reason participants did not disclose CAM use is that physicians did not ask them about it. However, positive communication about conventional treatment facilitated fruitful conversations about CAM. The participants wanted information about CAM from authoritative sources, primary from health care providers at the hospital and the Children's Cancer Society. They demand information about risks and benefits when using CAM as well as whether CAM can improve the immune system, fight the cancer, and improve the quality of life of the family. An evidence-based decision aid is warranted to enable health care providers and parents of children with cancer to make well-informed decisions about CAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Stub
- Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
| | - Sara A Quandt
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Miek C Jong
- Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Thomas A Arcury
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stub T, Kristoffersen AE, Overvåg G, Jong MC. An integrative review on the information and communication needs of parents of children with cancer regarding the use of complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Complement Med Ther 2020; 20:90. [PMID: 32183808 PMCID: PMC7079450 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-02882-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Parents often choose Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) as a supportive agent with the aim to reduce cancer treatment-related symptoms in their children. Therefore, it is necessary to understand parents´ information and communication needs regarding CAM. The aim of the present study was to review the research literature as to identify the information and communication needs of parents of children with cancer, and the children themselves, regarding the use of CAM. Methods An integrative systematic review design was chosen. Searches were performed in AMED, CAMbase, CINAHL (Ebsco), EMBASE, PubMed and PsycInfo, Theme eJournals and Karger. The search was limited to studies published in English, German, Dutch, and the Scandinavian languages. Using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened the title and abstracts of the relevant papers. A data extraction form and critical appraisal checklists were used to extract data for analysis, and a mixed methods synthesis was applied. Results Out of 24 studies included, 67% were of quantitative and 33% of qualitative study design. Five main themes emerged from the analysis of 21 studies: Information on CAM, sources of CAM information, communication about CAM, informed decision-making on CAM, and Risk/benefit of CAM. The majority of the parents did not disclose the CAM use of their children because they feared negative reactions from the attending oncologist. To make informed treatment decisions for their children, parents wanted unbiased information about CAM and would act accordingly. They demand open communication about these modalities and respect for the family’s autonomy when choosing CAM for their children. Conclusion There is an urgent need for parents of children with cancer for high quality information on CAM from reliable and scientific sources. Development of authoritative evidence-based decision tools is thus warranted to enable health care professionals and parents of children with cancer to make well informed, individual decisions concerning CAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Stub
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9019, Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9019, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Grete Overvåg
- Science and Health Library, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9019, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Miek C Jong
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Hansine Hansens veg 19, 9019, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stub T, Kiil MA, Lie B, Kristoffersen AE, Weiss T, Hervik JB, Musial F. Combining psychotherapy with craniosacral therapy for severe traumatized patients: A qualitative study from an outpatient clinic in Norway. Complement Ther Med 2020; 49:102320. [PMID: 32147031 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Craniosacral therapy (CST) is an established complementary modality for several health complaints. A clinic for psychosomatics in Norway has included CST into a multimodal treatment approach for severely traumatized patients. The aim of this study was to investigate and describe the indications for the use of craniosacral therapy within trauma therapy. Specifically, to explore treatment philosophy, criteria for improvement, treatment aims, and the evaluation of the risk profile of the multimodal treatment approach. METHODS Semi-structured individual interviews (n = 8) and one focus group interview were conducted with the therapists at the Clinic for Psychosomatics, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway. The text data were transcribed verbatim, and the analysis of the material was conducted according to conventional and direct content analysis. RESULTS The therapists at the clinic applied a holistic treatment approach, based on their understanding of mind and body as one entity. To access emotions and traumata, they used a mixture of different treatment techniques. The therapists experienced patients with severe bodily symptoms as being less cognitively present and attributed this to the symptoms craving most mental resources. The craniosacral therapists' specific aims and task within the multimodal trauma therapy was to ease these physical complaints, so that cognitive and emotional resources could be utilized for therapy. The psychotherapists found that emotions and traumata were more accessible after CST. The general treatment goals were to increase symptom tolerance levels and to enable better self-care. Furthermore, the ability to transform negative behaviors and develop positive alternatives were considered to be signs of improvement. CONCLUSION The study participants considered that patients with complex traumas, including post-traumatic stress disorder, seemed to benefit from this multimodal treatment approach and appreciated its' holistic treatment philosophy, including craniosacral therapy. With regard to patient safety, the study participants recommended that craniosacral therapy for severely traumatized patients should only be provided in cooperation with psychotherapists, or other highly qualified health personnel working in specialized institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Stub
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UIT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway.
| | - Mona A Kiil
- Psychiatry Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, UIT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway.
| | - Birgit Lie
- Clinic for Psychosomatics, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway.
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UIT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway.
| | - Thomas Weiss
- Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Germany.
| | - Jill Brook Hervik
- Department of Anesthesia, Pain Clinic, Vestfold Hospital Trust, 3116, Tonsberg, Norway.
| | - Frauke Musial
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UIT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kristoffersen AE, Broderstad AR, Musial F, Stub T. Prevalence, and health- and sociodemographic associations for visits to traditional and complementary medical providers in the seventh survey of the Tromsø study. Altern Ther Health Med 2019; 19:305. [PMID: 31711478 PMCID: PMC6849167 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-019-2707-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Patient-centered culturally sensitive health care (PC-CSHC) has emerged as a primary approach to health care. This care focuses on the cultural diversity of the patients rather than the views of the health care professionals. PC-CSHC enables the patient to feel comfortable, respected, and trusted in the health care delivery process. As users of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) rarely inform their conventional health care providers of such use, the providers need to identify the users of T&CM themselves to avoid negative interaction with conventional medicine and to be able to provide them with PC-CSHC. Since the patterns of traditional medicine (TM) use are different to those of complementary medicine (CM), the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, and the health- and sociodemographic associations for visits to TM- and CM providers in an urban population. Method The data were collected through two self-administrated questionnaires from the seventh survey of the Tromsø Study, a population-based cohort study conducted in 2015–2016. All inhabitants of Tromsø aged 40 or above were invited (n = 32,591) and n = 21,083 accepted the invitation (response rate 65%). Pearson chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA tests were used to describe differences between the groups whereas binary logistic regressions were used for adjusted values. Results The results revealed that 2.5% of the participants had seen a TM provider, 8.5% had seen a CM provider whereas 1% had visited both a TM and a CM provider during a 12-month period. TM users tended to be older, claim that religion was more important to them, have poorer economy and health, and have lower education compared to CM users. We found that more than 90% of the participants visiting T&CM providers also used conventional medicine. Conclusion A considerable number of the participants in this study employed parallel health care modalities including visits to conventional, traditional, and complementary medicine providers. To offer patient-centered culturally sensitive health care that is tailored to the patients’ treatment philosophy and spiritual needs, conventional health care providers need knowledge about, and respect for their patients’ use of parallel health care systems.
Collapse
|
21
|
Liu XH, Lu CL, Wang LQ, Shang YX, Stub T, Kristoffersen AE, Norheim AJ, Musial F, Alraek T, Fonnebo V, Liu JP. Beneficial effectiveness and safety of homeopathic therapy for upper respiratory tract infection in children: a systematic review. Advances in Integrative Medicine 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aimed.2019.03.263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
22
|
Stub T, Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Sandberg JS, Kristoffersen AE. Conventional and complementary cancer treatment: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities. Advances in Integrative Medicine 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aimed.2019.03.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
23
|
Lu CL, Liu XH, Stub T, Kristoffersen AE, Liang SB, Wang X, Bai X, Norheim AJ, Musial F, Alræk T, Fonnebo V, Liu JP. Correction to: Complementary and alternative medicine for treatment of atopic eczema in children under 14 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Complement Altern Med 2019; 19:16. [PMID: 30642310 PMCID: PMC6332624 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2421-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
24
|
Stub T, Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Sandberg JC, Kristoffersen AE. Conventional and complementary cancer treatments: where do conventional and complementary providers seek information about these modalities? BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:854. [PMID: 30428878 PMCID: PMC6234581 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3674-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Both conventional health care providers and complementary therapists treat cancer patients. To provide effective treatment, both types of providers should to be familiar with their own as well as alternative types of treatment. Our aim was to compare how conventional health care providers (oncology doctors, oncology nurses, family physicians) and complementary therapists (acupuncturists, reflexologists, massage therapists) seek information about conventional and complementary cancer treatments. Method This analysis was conducted on the basis of feedback from 466 participants. We used self-administered questionnaires in a cross-sectional study. Results The majority of the medical doctors (96%) searched for evidence-based information regarding conventional cancer treatments. They gathered this information mostly from guidelines, which is considered best practice and is expected from Norwegian health personnel. Eighty-one percent of the nurses gather this information from evidence based resources such as UpToDate. Colleagues were asked for information by 58% of the medical doctors and 64% of the nurses. Moreover, 50% of the medical doctors and 57% of the nurses searched for evidence-based information about complementary cancer modalities. The acupuncturists gathered evidence-based information for both conventional (79%) and complementary (77%) modalities, followed by the reflexologists (54 and 54%, respectively) and massage therapists (54 and 52%, respectively). Nearly half of the acupuncturist (49%) asked a colleague for information. Conclusion To provide safe cancer care, it is important that advice about complementary modalities is based on current and evidence-based evaluations. The majority of the medical doctors and nurses in this study sought information according to evidence-based medicine regarding conventional cancer treatments, and about half of them gathered evidence-based information about complementary cancer modalities. This was also true for the complementary therapists as they gathered information about complementary and conventional treatments from evidence-based evaluations. This demonstrates that since the term evidence-based medicine was first introduced in 1991, the approach has grown extensively and both conventional and complementary providers use this approach to seek information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Stub
- Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Sykehusveien 21, 9037, Tromsø, Norway. .,Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
| | - Sara A Quandt
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Thomas A Arcury
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Joanne C Sandberg
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Sykehusveien 21, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kristoffersen AE, Stub T, Knudsen-Baas O, Udal AH, Musial F. Self-Reported Effects of Energy Healing: A Prospective Observational Study With Pre-Post Design. Explore (NY) 2018; 15:115-125. [PMID: 30262161 DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2018.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Healing is reported to be used by 16.8% of the population, however utilization may be considerably higher in selected patient groups. The aim of this study was to map the symptoms the participants reported when visiting a healer for the first time, and to evaluate the subjectively experienced benefits and risks from the healing sessions. METHOD Data were obtained from the Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) questionnaire. One-hundred adults who, for the first time, referred themselves to a healer in southern Norway between January 2016 and January 2017 were included in the study. Eligible for analyses were 92 participants who fulfilled their treatment plan and returned both the baseline (pre) and post-treatment questionnaire. The occurring symptoms were grouped according to their nature into four symptom groups: pain, psychological problems, fatigue and other. With regard to the observational character of the study, all results were described and interpreted descriptively and exact p-values were given and interpreted as measures of effect. RESULTS The participants who visited the healers in this study were mainly women (80%) with chronic disease (82%), with pain, fatigue and/or psychological problems as main complaints. They experienced an improvement of symptoms, well-being and improved activity level of approximately 50% regardless of the nature of the complaints. Women reported more improvement than men did. The pre-post changes was found after an average of 4.1 treatments. Forty percent of the participants reported adverse effects, which occurred directly after the healing session, generally lasting for less than one day. CONCLUSION The study participants reported substantial improvement of, and major reduction of the burden of symptoms, improved well-being and activity level after healing sessions. Due to the observational nature of the study, no interpretations about specificity of the descriptive results or the mechanisms of effect can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnete E Kristoffersen
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
| | - Trine Stub
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | | | | | - Frauke Musial
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lu CL, Liu XH, Stub T, Kristoffersen AE, Liang SB, Wang X, Bai X, Norheim AJ, Musial F, Araek T, Fonnebo V, Liu JP. Complementary and alternative medicine for treatment of atopic eczema in children under 14 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Complement Altern Med 2018; 18:260. [PMID: 30257693 PMCID: PMC6158902 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2306-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to limitations of conventional medicine for atopic eczema (AE), complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widely used as an alternative, maintaining, or simultaneous treatment for AE. We aimed to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of CAM for children with AE under 14 years old. METHODS We searched for randomized trials on CAM in 12 Chinese and English databases from their inception to May 2018. We included children (< 14 years) diagnosed with AE, who received CAM therapy alone or combined with conventional medicine. We extracted data, and used the Cochrane "Risk of bias" tool to assess methodological quality. Effect was presented as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS Twenty-four randomized controlled trials involving 2233 children with AE were included. Methodological quality was of unclear or high risk of bias in general. The trials tested 5 different types of CAM therapies, including probiotics, diet, biofilm, borage oil, and swimming. Compared to placebo, probiotics showed improved effect for the SCORAD index (MD 9.01, 95% CI 7.12-10.90; n = 5). For symptoms and signs such as itching, skin lesions, CAM combined with usual care was more effective for symptom relief ≥95% (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.30-1.68; n = 8), and for ≥50% symptoms improvement (RR 1.34, 1.25-1.45; n = 9) compared to usual care. There was no statistic significant difference between CAM and usual care on ≥95% improvement or ≥ 50% improvement of symptoms. However, swimming, diet and biofilm showed improvement of clinical symptoms compared with usual care. At follow-up of 8 weeks to 3 years, CAM alone or combined with usual care showed lower relapse rate (RR 0.38, 0.28-0.51, n = 2; RR 0.31, 0.24-0.40, n = 7; respectively) compared to usual care. Twelve out of 24 trials reported no occurrence of severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Low evidence demonstrates that some CAM modalities may improve symptoms of childhood AE and reduce relapse rate. Safety remains unclear due to insufficient reporting. Further well-designed randomized trials are needed to confirm the potential beneficial effect and to establish safety use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-li Lu
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029 China
| | - Xue-han Liu
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029 China
| | - Trine Stub
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Agnete E. Kristoffersen
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Shi-bing Liang
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029 China
- School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan, 030000 China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029 China
| | - Xue Bai
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029 China
| | - Arne Johan Norheim
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Frauke Musial
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Terje Araek
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Vinjar Fonnebo
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Jian-ping Liu
- Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029 China
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sivertsen K, Lukic M, Kristoffersen AE. Gender specific association between the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and alcohol consumption and injuries caused by drinking in the sixth Tromsø study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2018; 18:239. [PMID: 30103714 PMCID: PMC6090777 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2301-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol is consumed almost worldwide and is the most widely used recreational drug in the world. Harmful use of alcohol is known to cause a large disease-, social- and economic burden on society. Only a few studies have examined the relationship between CAM use and alcohol consumption. To our knowledge there has been no such research in Norway. The aim of this study is to describe and compare alcohol consumption and injuries related to alcohol across gender and different CAM approaches. METHODS The data used in this study is based on questionnaire data gathered from the sixth Tromsø Study conducted between 2007 and 2008. Information on CAM use and alcohol consumption was available for 6819 women and 5994 men, 64.8% of the invited individuals. Pearson chi-square tests and independent sample t-tests were used to describe the basic characteristics of the participants and to calculate the differences between men and women regarding these variables. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the associations between the different CAM approaches and alcohol consumptions and injuries caused by drinking. RESULTS Women who drank alcohol more than once a month were more likely to have applied herbal or "natural" medicine and self-treatment techniques (meditation, yoga, qi gong or tai-chi), compared to those who never drank, and those who only drank monthly or less. For women, an association was also found between having experienced injuries caused by drinking and use of self-treatment techniques and visit to a CAM practitioner. No association was found between amount of alcohol consumed and use of CAM approaches. For men, an association was found between injuries caused by drinking and use of herbal or "natural" medicine. CONCLUSION The findings from this cross-sectional study suggests that women who drink frequently are more likely to use "natural" medicine and self-treatment techniques. Both men and women who had experienced injuries because of their drinking were more likely to have used CAM approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Sivertsen
- Department for drugs – and addiction treatment and A-larm Norway, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Marko Lukic
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Agnete E. Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kristoffersen AE, Stub T, Musial F, Fønnebø V, Lillenes O, Norheim AJ. Prevalence and reasons for intentional use of complementary and alternative medicine as an adjunct to future visits to a medical doctor for chronic disease. BMC Complement Altern Med 2018; 18:109. [PMID: 29580283 PMCID: PMC5870092 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2179-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Intentional use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has previously only been researched in small, possibly biased, samples. There seems to be a lack of scientific information regarding healthy individual’s attitudes and presumed use of CAM. The aim of this study is to describe prevalence and characteristics of participants who intend to see a CAM provider compared to participants who intend to see a medical doctor (MD) only when suffering from a chronic, non- life-threatening disease and in the need of treatment. Further to describe differences between the groups regarding expected reasons for CAM use and expected skills of CAM providers. Method The survey was conducted in January 2016 as part of the “TNS Gallup Health policy Barometer”. In total, 1728 individuals aged 16–92 years participated in the study, constituting an overall response rate of 47%. The survey included questions regarding opinions and attitudes towards health, health services and health politics in Norway. Results The majority of the participants (90.2%) would see a MD only if they were suffering from a chronic, non- life-threatening disease and were in the need of treatment. Men over the age of 60 with a university education tended to see a MD only. Only 9.8% of all respondents would in addition visit a CAM provider. Being an intentional user of a MD + CAM provider was associated with being a woman under the age of 60. The respondents believed that CAM providers have professional competence based on formal training in CAM. They also believed that individuals seeing a CAM provider have poor health and are driven by the hope of being cured. Further, that they have heard that others have good experience with such treatment. Conclusion Intentional use of CAM is associated with positive attitudes, trustworthiness, and presumed positive experiences in the CAM-patient-setting. Intentional CAM users also have the impression that CAM providers have professional competence based on formal training in alternative therapies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12906-018-2179-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
29
|
Stub T, Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Sandberg JC, Kristoffersen AE. Attitudes and knowledge about direct and indirect risks among conventional and complementary health care providers in cancer care. BMC Complement Altern Med 2018; 18:44. [PMID: 29386005 PMCID: PMC5793440 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2106-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Many complementary therapies offer benefits for patients with cancer. Others may be risky for patients due to negative interactions with conventional treatment and adverse effects. Therefore, cancer patients need guidance from health care providers to assess complementary modalities appropriately to receive benefits and avoid harm. Method In a self-administered questionnaire-based cross-sectional study, we compared knowledge and attitudes of health care providers with no training in complementary modalities to that of health care providers with training in complementary modalities about the risks for patients who combine complementary modalities with conventional treatment in cancer care. The analysis was based on responses from 466 participants. Results The attitudes and knowledge about direct risk followed provider specialty. Ninety-four percent of the medical doctors, 93% of the nurses, and 87% of the providers with dual training, but 70% of the complementary therapists, believed that complementary modalities can cause adverse effects (p < 0.001). The majority of the medical doctors and nurses believed that it is risky to combine complementary and conventional cancer treatments (78% and 93%, respectively), compared to 58% of the providers with dual training and 43% of the complementary therapists (p < 0.001). Eighty-nine percent of the medical doctors and nurses believed that complementary modalities should be subjected to more scientific testing before being accepted by conventional health care providers, in contrast to 56% of the dually trained and 57% of the complementary therapists (p < 0.001). The majority of the medical doctors (61%) and nurses (55%) would have neither discouraged nor encouraged the use of complementary modalities if patients asked them for advice. Moreover, less than 1% of the complementary therapists would have discouraged the use of conventional cancer treatments. The study participants believed that the most important factor to recommend a complementary cancer modality to patients is evidence for safety. Conclusion The health care providers in this study believed that complementary modalities are associated with direct risk and can cause adverse effects, and that it is risky to combine conventional and complementary treatments due to potential harmful interactions.
Collapse
|
30
|
Ortiz M, Schnabel K, Teut M, Rotter G, Binting S, Cree M, Lotz F, Suhr R, Brinkhaus B, Parvizi MM, Handjani F, Zarshenas MM, Moein MR, Nimrouzi M, Hatam G, Hasanzadeh J, Hamidizadeh N, Parvizi MM, Heydari M, Namazi MR, Parvizi Z, Pasalar M, Mosaffa-Jahromi M, Bagheri-Lankarani K, Afsharypuor S, Tamaddon AM, Ostovar M, Peloni G, Bolliger I, Faria RMDC, Quadri P, Sanzeni W, Zemp D, Risvoll H, Giverhaug T, Halvorsen KH, Waaseth M, Musial F, Rossi E, Baccetti S, Picchi M, Conti T, Firenzuoli F, Guido C, Bosco F, Guido C, Rossi E, Panozzo M, Picchi M, Cervino C, Nurra L, Rossi E, Picchi M, Firenzuoli F, Traversi A, Vuono K, Sabatini F, Bellandi T, Rutert B, Eggert A, Seifert G, Stritter W, Holmberg C, Längler A, Salamonsen A, Wiesener S, Schad F, Steele M, Kröz M, Matthes H, Herbstreit C, Thronicke A, Schlingensiepen I, von Schoen-Angerer T, Schneider R, Waeber L, Vagedes J, Kaczala G, Pharisa C, Wildhaber J, Huber B, Sidorov P, Sovershaeva E, Simões-Wüst AP, Nietlispach A, Mennet M, Schnelle M, von Mandach U, Wang X, Woo HL, Lee JM, Wu Y, Cho Y, Yun Y, Kim H, Jung W, Jang BH, Ziea E, Hui H, Li M, Tsui D, Lam C, Hsieh J, Chan E, Balneaves L, Burnside S, Doyle E, Dorazio S, Chan PK, Bhagra A, Chen PH, Chung VCH, Wu JCY, Lin ZX, Wong W, Wu XY, Ho RST, Wong CHL, Chan L, Ziea ETC, Elder W, Cardarelli R, Kaspar C, Kempenich R, Kopferschmitt J, Marinko Z, Damir S, Vcev A, Monezi R, Ruggerini EM, Fuchigami IM, Mazini ACM, Monezi R, Oliveira MW, Papuga P, Schloss J, Steel A, Jacobsen MDS, Monezi R, Jacobsen MR, Mangini MT, Trapani G, Di Giampietro T, Zanino L, Ciullo L, Lanaro D, Cerritelli F, Macrì F, Tsai A, Lin C, Wu TH, D’Alessandro E, Watts S, Zhang Y, Wu X, Li X, Fei Y, Liu J, Zhao N, Jia L, Yan X, Zhen F, Liu Z, Liu J, Ahn J, Yun Y, AlEidi S, Mohamed AG, Al-Beda AM, Abutalib RA, Khalil MKM, Amri H, Badekila S, Behmanesh E, Mozaffarpour S, Behmanesh E, Mozaffarpour S, Behmanesh E, Shirooye P, Meybodi RN, Mokaberinejad R, Tansaz M, Mozaffarpour S, Chung VCH, Wu XY, Wu JCY, Daneshfard B, Hosseinkhani A, Tafazoli V, Jaladat AM, Jaladat AM, Sadeghi H, Jia L, Zhao N, Yan X, Zhou L, Zhao M, Li W, Liu J, Liu Z, Jia L, Zhao N, Yan X, Zhou L, Zhao M, Li W, Liu J, Liu Z, Larsen AL, Salamonsen A, Kristoffersen AE, Hamran T, Evjen B, Stub T, Li M, Cai J, Lu T, Yin L, Wu D, Wang L, Liew SM, Liu T, Bai C, Zheng Z, Wan Y, Xu J, Wang X, Yu H, Gu X, Liu Z, Yan X, Jia L, Zhao N, Yang G, Liu J, Mozaffarpour S, Behmanesh E, Nimrouzi M, Tafazoli V, Daneshfard B, Ostrowski D, Fox K, Pasalar M, Tabatabei F, Amini F, Sathasivampillai S, Rajamanoharan P, Munday M, Heinrich M, Scherrer YM, Heinrich M, Szuter C, Amini F, Tabatabaei F, Tavakoli A, Tavakoli F, Pasalar M, rostami M, Torri MC, Szuter C, Walach H, Warner F, Majumdar A, Serasingh P, Yan X, Jia L, Zhao N, Liu Z, Liu J, Zhao N, Zhen F, Jia L, Yan X, Liu Z, Liu J, Abbing A, Ponstein A, Baars E, Croke S, Hanser S, Heckel V, Krüerke D, Simões-Wüst AP, Weiss S, Metzner S, Lee JW, Hyun MK, Masetti M, Oepen R, Gruber H, Heusser P, Pelz H, Perlitz V, Ponstein A, Abbing A, Baars E, Robinson N, Ronan P, Mian A, Madge S, Lorenc A, Agent P, Carr S, Ronan P, Robinson N, Carr S, Mian A, Lorenc A, Agent P, Madge S, Winnubst ME, Monezi R, Abolghasemi J, Heydari M, Baccetti S, Rossi E, Fedi P, Di Stefano M, Belvedere K, Baccetti S, Rossi E, Firenzuoli F, Di Stefano M, Belvedere K, Beaven K, Rose A, Florschutz G, Phil NB, Parsons H, Stewart-Brown S, Burke K, Busch M, Heyning F, Smit J, Jeekel H, de Goeij H, Guido PC, Barraza N, Balbarrey Z, Ribas A, Jimenez B, Iachino C, Quattrone F, Gaioli M, Dell’Orso M, Villanueva S, Rocha C, Macchi A, Cai J, Chen L, Wu D, Wang S, Choi E, Go N, Lee Y, Dahal G, Frauenknecht X, Gerhardt H, Galanti M, Cerda CJ, Galanti M, Galanti M, Heckersdorf DN, Jorquera H, Saldivia MLA, Jakubonienė D, McEwen B, Melo F, Fontana FM, Valle ACV, Neres MTB, Mohagheghzadeh A, Zohalinezhad ME, Njaradi O, Dunjic M, Njaradi O, Dunjic M, Ostrowski D, Fox K, Pokladnikova J, Selke-Krulichova I, Seo J, Jang H, Simões-Wüst AP, Moltó-Puigmartí C, van Dongen M, Dagnelie P, Thijs C, Tihanyi E, Hegyi G, Zhang Y, Li X, Fei Y, Liu J, Zhang Y, Liu J, Tong X. World Congress Integrative Medicine & Health 2017: part three. Altern Ther Health Med 2017. [PMCID: PMC5499100 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1784-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
31
|
Ee C, Thuraisingam S, Pirotta M, French S, Xue C, Teede H, Kristoffersen AE, Sirois F, Stub T, Engler J, Joos S, Güthlin C, Felenda J, Beckmann C, Stintzing F, Evans R, Bronfort G, Keefe D, Taberko A, Hanson L, Haley A, Ma H, Jolton J, Yarosh L, Keefe F, Nam J, Evans R, Ojala L, Kreitzer MJ, Hanson L, Fink C, Kraft K, Flower A, Lewith G, Harman K, Stuart B, Bishop FL, Frawley J, Füleki L, Kiss E, Vancsik T, Krenacs T, Funabashi M, Pohlman KA, Mior S, Thiel H, Hill MD, Cassidy DJ, Westaway M, Yager J, Hurwitz E, Kawchuk GN, O’Beirne M, Vohra S, Gaboury I, Morin C, Gaertner K, Torchetti L, Frei-Erb M, Kundi M, Frass M, Gallo E, Maggini V, Comite M, Sofi F, Baccetti S, Vannacci A, Di Stefano M, Monechi MV, Gori L, Rossi E, Firenzuoli F, Mediati RD, Ballerini G, Gardiner P, Lestoquoy AS, Negash L, Stillman S, Shah P, Liebschutz J, Adelstein P, Farrell-Riley C, Brackup I, Penti B, Saper R, Sampedro IG, Carvajal G, Gleiss A, Gross MM, Brendlin D, Röttger J, Stritter W, Seifert G, Grzanna N, Stange R, Guendling PW, Gu W, Lu Y, Wang J, Zhang C, Hajimonfarednejad M, Hannan N, Hellsing R, Wode K, Nordberg JH, Nordberg JH, Andermo S, Arman M, von Hörsten I, Torrielo PV, Bai H, Vilaró CLA, Cabrera FC, Huber R, Hui H, Ziea E, Tsui D, Hsieh J, Lam C, Chan E, Jensen MP, He Y, Battalio SL, Chan J, Edwards KA, Gertz KJ, Day MA, Sherlin LH, Ehde DM, Kim KH, Jang S, Jang BH, Zhang X, Go HY, Park S, Ko SG, Kraft K, Janik H, Börner A, Lee J, Lee B, Chang GT, Menassa A, Zhang Z, Motoo Y, Müller J, Rabini S, Vinson B, Kelber O, Storr M, Kraft K, Niemeijer M, Baars E, Hoekman J, Wang D, Ruijssenaaars W, Njoku FC, Klose P, Brinkhaus B, Michalsen A, Dobos G, Cramer H, Norheim AJ, Alræk T, Okumus F, Meng F, Oncu-Celik H, Hagel A, Albrecht H, Vollbracht C, Dauth W, Hagel W, Vitali F, Ganzleben I, Schultis H, Konturek P, Stein J, Neurath M, Raithel M, Hagel A, Vollbracht C, Raithel M, Konturek P, Krick B, Haller H, Klose P, Dobos G, Kümmel S, Cramer H, Haller H, Saha FJ, Kowoll A, Ebner B, Berger B, Dobos G, Choi KE, He L, Wang H, He X, Gu C, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Tong X, He L, Wang H, He X, Gu C, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Tong X, He L, Wang H, He X, Gu C, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Tong X, Ho RST, Chung VCH, Wu X, Wong CHL, Wu JCY, Wong SYS, Lau AYL, Sit RWS, Wong W, Holmes M, Bishop F, Calman L, Holmes M, Bishop F, Lewith G, Newell D, Field J, Htut WL, Han D, Choi DI, Choi SJ, Kim HY, Hwang JH, Huang CW, Jang BH, Chen FP, Ko SG, Huang W, Jin D, Lian F, Jang S, Kim KH, Lee EK, Sun SH, Go HY, Ko Y, Park S, Jang BH, Shin YC, Ko SG, Janik H, Greiffenhagen N, Bolte J, Kraft K, Jaworski M, Adamus M, Dobrzynska A, Jeitler M, Jaspers J, von Scheidt C, Koch B, Michalsen A, Steckhan N, Kessler C, Jin D, Huang WJ, Pang B, Lian FM, Jong M, Baars E, Glockmann A, Hamre H, Kainuma M, Murakami A, Kubota T, Kobayashi D, Sumoto Y, Furusyo N, Ando SI, Shimazoe T, Kelber O, Verjee S, Gorgus E, Schrenk D, Kemper K, Hill E, Kemper K, Rao N, Gascon G, Mahan J, Kienle G, Dietrich J, Schmoor C, Huber R, Kim WH, Han D, Ahmed M, He L, Hwang JH, Kiss E, Vancsik T, Meggyeshazi N, Kovago C, Krenacs T, Klaus AK, Zerm R, Pranga D, Ostermann T, Reif M, von Laue HB, Brinkhaus B, Kröz M, Klaus AK, Zerm R, Pranga D, Recchia DR, Ostermann T, Reif M, von Laue HB, Brinkhaus B, Kröz M, Klein-Laansma CT, Jong M, von Hagens C, Jansen JP, van Wietmarschen H, Jong MC, Ko Y, Sun SH, Go HY, Jeon CY, Song YK, Ko SG, Koch AK, Rabsilber S, Lauche R, Kümmel S, Dobos G, Langhorst J, Cramer H, Koch AK, Trifunovic-Koenig M, Klose P, Cramer H, Dobos G, Langhorst J, Koster E, Baars E, Delnoij D, Kroll L, Weiss K, Kubo A, Hendlish S, Altschuler A, Connolly N, Avins A, Lauche R, Recchia DR, Cramer H, Wardle J, Lee D, Sibbritt D, Adams J, Ostermann T, Lauche R, Sibbritt D, Park C, Mishra G, Adams J, Cramer H, Lechner J, Lee I, Chae Y, Lee J, Cho SH, Choi Y, Lee JY, Ryu HS, Yoon SS, Oh HK, Hyun LK, Kim JO, Yoon SW, Lee JY, Shin SH, Jang M, Müller I, Park SHJ, Lestoquoy AS, Laird L, Negash L, Mitchell S, Gardiner P, Li X, Wang Y, Zhen J, Yu H, Liu T, Gu X, Liu H, Ma W, Zhang C, Shang X, Bai Y, Meng F, Liu W, Rooney C, Smith A, Lopes S, Demarzo M, do Patrocínio Nunes M, Lorenz P, Gründemann C, Heinrich M, Garcia-Käufer M, Grunewald F, Messerschmidt S, Herrick A, Gruber K, Beckmann C, Knödler M, Huber R, Steinborn C, Stintzing F, Lu T, Wang L, Wu D, Luberto CM, Hall DL, Chad-Friedman E, Lechner S, Park ER, Luberto CM, Park E, Goodman J, Luer S, Heri M, von Ammon K, Frei-Erb M, Ma W, Meng F, Maggini V, Gallo E, Landini I, Lapucci A, Nobili S, Mini E, Firenzuoli F, McDermott C, Lewith G, Richards S, Cox D, Frossell S, Leydon G, Eyles C, Raphael H, Rogers R, Selby M, Adler C, Allam J, Meng F, Gu W, Zhang C, Bai H, Zhang Z, Wang D, Bu X, Zhang H, Zhang J, Liu H, Mikolasek M, Berg J, Witt C, Barth J, Miskulin I, Lalic Z, Miskulin M, Dumic A, Sebo D, Vcev A, Mohammed NAA, Han D, Ahmed M, Choi SJ, Im HB, Hwang JH, Mukherjee A, Kandhare A, Bodhankar S, Mukherjee A, Kandhare A, Thakurdesai P, Bodhankar S, Munk N, Evans E, Froman A, Kline M, Bair MJ, Musial F, Kristoffersen AE, Alræk T, Hamre HJ, Stub T, Björkman L, Fønnebø VM, Pang B, Lian FM, Ni Q, Tong XL, Li XL, Liu WK, Feng S, Zhao XY, Zheng YJ, Zhao XM, Lin YQ, Pang B, Lian FM, Tong XL, Zhao TY, Zhao XY, Phd HC, Zhang C, Pang B, Liu F, Tong XL, Zhao LH, Zhao XM, Ye R, Gu CJ, Pang B, Ni Q, Tong XL, Lian FM, Zhao XY, Jin D, Zhao XM, Zheng YJ, Lin YQ, Peng W, Lauche R, Sibbritt D, Adams J, Peng W, Wardle J, Cramer H, Mishra G, Lauche R, Pohlman KA, Mior S, Funabashi M, De Carvalho D, El-Bayoumi M, Haig B, Kelly K, Wade DJ, O’Beirne M, Vohra S, Portalupi E, Gobo G, Bellavita L, Guglielmetti C, Raak C, Teuber M, Molsberger F, von Rath U, Reichelt U, Schwanebeck U, Zeil S, Vogelberg C, Veintimilla DR, Vollbracht C, Mery GT, Villavicencio MM, Moran SH, Sachse C, Gündlin PW, Stange R, Sahebkarkhorasani M, Azizi H, Schumann D, Lauche R, Sundberg T, Leach MJ, Cramer H, Seca S, Greten H, Selliah S, Shakya A, Han D, Kim HY, Choi DI, Im HB, Choi SJ, Sherbakova A, Ulrich-Merzenich G, Kelber O, Abdel-Aziz H, Sibinga E, Webb L, Ellen J, Skrautvol K, Nåden D, Song R, Grabowska W, Osypiuk K, Diaz GV, Bonato P, Park M, Hausdorff J, Fox M, Sudarsky LR, Tarsy D, Novakowski J, Macklin EA, Wayne PM, Song R, Hwang I, Ahn S, Lee MA, Wayne PM, Sohn MK, Sorokin O, Steckhan N, Heydeck D, Borchert A, Hohmann CD, Kühn H, Michalsen A, Kessler C, Steckhan N, Hohmann CD, Cramer H, Michalsen A, Dobos G, von Scheidt C, Kirschbaum C, Stalder T, Stöckigt B, Teut M, Suhr R, Sulmann D, Brinkhaus B, Streeter C, Gerbarg P, Silveri M, Brown R, Jensen J, Stritter W, Rutert B, Eggert A, Längler A, Seifert G, Holmberg C, Sun J, Deng X, Li WY, Wen B, Robinson N, Liu JP, Sung HK, Yang N, Go HY, Shin SM, Jung H, Kim YJ, Jung WS, Park TY, Suzuki K, Ito T, Uchida S, Kamohara S, Ono N, Takamura M, Yokochi A, Maruyama K, Tapia P, Thabaut K, Brinkhaus B, Stöckigt B, Thronicke A, Kröz M, Steele M, Matthes H, Herbstreit C, Schad F, Tian J, Lian F, Yang L, Tong X, Tian T, Zhang H, Tian X, Wang C, Chai QY, Zhang L, Xia R, Huang N, Fei Y, Liu J, Trent N, Miraglia M, Dusek J, Pasalis E, Khalsa SB, Trifunovic-König M, Klose P, Cramer H, Lauche R, Koch A, Dobos G, Langhorst J, Uebelacker L, Tremont G, Gillette L, Epstein-Lubow G, Strong D, Abrantes A, Tyrka A, Tran T, Gaudiano B, Miller I, Ullmann G, Ullmann G, Li Y, Vaidya S, Marathe V, Vale AC, Motta J, Donadão F, Valente AC, Valente LCC, Ghelman R, Vesovic D, Jevdic D, Jevdic A, Jevdic K, Djacic M, Letic D, Bozic D, Markovic M, Dunjic S, Vesovic D, Jevdic D, Jevdic A, Jevdic K, Djacic M, Letic D, Bozic D, Markovic M, Ruscuklic G, Baksa D, Dunjic S, Vesovic D, Jevdic D, Jevdic A, Jevdic K, Djacic M, Letic D, Bozic D, Markovic M, Ruscuklic G, Baksa D, Dunjic S, Vesovic D, Jevdic D, Jevdic A, Jevdic K, Djacic M, Letic D, Bozic D, Markovic M, Ruscuklic G, Baksa D, Dunjic S, Vesovic D, Jevdic D, Jevdic A, Jevdic K, Djacic M, Letic D, Bozic D, Markovic M, Vrca K, Dunjic S, Vincent A, Wahner-Roedler D, Whipple M, Vogelius MM, Vollbracht C, Friesecke I, Gündling PW, Wahner-Roedler D, Mahapatra S, Hynes R, Van Rooy K, Looker S, Ghosh A, Bauer B, Cutshall S, Walach H, Flores AB, Walach H, Ofner M, Kastner A, Schwarzl G, Schwameder H, Alexander N, Strutzenberger G, Wang J, Lu Y, Gu W, Zhang C, Bu X, Zhang H, Zhang J, He Y, Zhang X, Meng F, Wang S, Yu H, Shi J, Hao Y, Liu T, Wu J, Qiu Z, Gu X, Wang YH, Lou CJ, Watts S, Wayne P, Osypiuk K, Vergara-Diaz G, Bonato P, Gow B, Hausdorff J, Miranda J, Sudarsky L, Tarsy D, Fox M, Macklin E, Wode K, Bergqvist J, Bernhardsson BM, Nordberg JH, Kienle G, Sharp L, Henriksson R, Woo Y, Hyun MK, Wu H, Wang TF, Zhao Y, Wei Y, Tian L, He L, Wang X, Wu R, Feng S, Han M, Caldwell PHY, Liu S, Zhang J, Liu J, Xia R, Chai Q, Fei Y, Guo Z, Wang C, Liu Z, Li X, Zhang Y, Liu J, Yang IJ, Lincha VR, Ahn SH, Lee DU, Shin HM, Yang L, Sibbritt D, Peng W, Adams J, Yang N, Sung H, Shin SM, Go HY, Jung H, Kim Y, Park TY, Yap A, Kwan YH, Tan CS, Ibrahim S, Ang SB, Yayi A, Han D, Im HB, Hwang JH, Choi SJ, Yoo JE, Yoo HR, Jang SB, Lee HL, Youssef A, Ezzat S, Motaal AA, El-Askary H, Yu X, Cui Y, Zhang Y, Lian F, Yun Y, Ko Y, Ahn JH, Jang BH, Kim KS, Ko SG, Choi I, Zerm R, Glinz A, Pranga D, Berger B, ten Brink F, Reif M, Büssing A, Gutenbrunner C, Kröz M, Zerm R, Helbrecht B, Pranga D, Brinkhaus B, Michalsen A, Kröz M, Zhang H, Fang T, Wang J, Zhang C, He Y, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Wang D, Meng F, Zhang J, Zhang C, Bai H, Shen Z, Ma W, Liu H, Bai Y, Shang X, Meng F, Zhang R, Wu F, Li M, Xuan X, Shen X, Ren K, Berman B, Zhen J, Li X, Gu X, Yu H, Zheng Z, Wan Y, Wang Y, Ma X, Dong F, Liu T, Zhen J, Li X, Gu X, Yu H, Zheng Z, Wan Y, Wang Y, Ma X, Dong F, Liu T, Zick S, Harris R, Bae GE, Kwon JN, Lee HY, Nam JK, Lee SD, Lee DH, Han JY, Yun YJ, Lee JH, Park HL, Park SH, Bocci C, Ivaldi GB, Vietti I, Meaglia I, Guffi M, Ruggiero R, Gualea M, Longa E, Bonucci M, Croke S, Rodriguez LD, Caracuel-Martínez JC, Fajardo-Rodríguez MF, Ariza-García A, la Fuente FGD, Arroyo-Morales M, Estrems MS, Gómez VG, Estrems MS, Sabater MV, Ferreri R, Bernardini S, Pulcri R, Cracolici F, Rinaldi M, Porciani C, Firenzuoli F, Baccetti S, Di Stefano M, Monechi MV, Gallo E, Maggini V, Gori L, Rossi E, Fisher P, Hughes J, Mendoza A, MacPherson H, Witt C, Filshie J, Lewith G, Di Francesco A, Bernardini A, Messe M, Primitivo V, Iasella PA, Ghelman R, Taminato M, Alcantara JDC, De Oliveira KR, Rodrigues DCDA, Mumme JRC, Sunakozawa OKM, Filho VO, Seifert G, Goldenberg J, Day A, Sasagawa M, Ward L, Cooley K, Gunnarsdottir T, Hjaltadottir I. World Congress Integrative Medicine & Health 2017: part two. BMC Complement Altern Med 2017. [PMCID: PMC5498867 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1783-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
32
|
Kristoffersen AE, Sirois FM, Stub T, Hansen AH. Prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use among people with coronary heart disease or at risk for this in the sixth Tromsø study: a comparative analysis using protection motivation theory. Altern Ther Health Med 2017. [PMID: 28629411 PMCID: PMC5477262 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1817-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Engagement in healthy lifestyle behaviors, such as healthy diet and regular physical activity, are known to reduce the risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD). Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is known to be associated with having a healthy lifestyle. The primary aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and predictors of CAM use in CHD patients, and in those without CHD but at risk for developing CHD, using Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) as a guiding conceptual framework. Method Questionnaire data were collected from 12,981 adult participants in the cross-sectional sixth Tromsø Study (2007–8). Eligible for analyses were 11,103 participants who reported whether they had used CAM or not. Of those, 830 participants reported to have or have had CHD (CHD group), 4830 reported to have parents, children or siblings with CHD (no CHD but family risk), while 5443 reported no CHD nor family risk of CHD. We first compared the patterns of CAM use in each group, and then examined the PMT predictors of CAM use. Health vulnerability from the threat appraisal process of PMT was assessed by self-rated health and expectations for future health. Response efficacy from the coping appraisal process of PMT was assessed as preventive health beliefs and health behavior frequency. Results Use of CAM was most commonly seen in people with no CHD themselves, but family risk of developing CHD (35.8%), compared to people already diagnosed with CHD (30.2%) and people with no CHD nor family risk (32.1%). All four of the PMT factors; self-rated health, expectations for future health, preventive health beliefs, and the health behavior index – were predictors for CAM use in the no CHD but family risk group. Conclusion These findings suggest that people use CAM in response to a perceived risk of developing CHD, and to prevent disease and to maintain health.
Collapse
|
33
|
Stub T, Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Sandberg JC, Kristoffersen AE. Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers. BMC Complement Altern Med 2017; 17:301. [PMID: 28595577 PMCID: PMC5465600 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1814-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Effective interdisciplinary communication is important to achieve better quality in health care. The aims of this study were to compare conventional and complementary providers’ experience of communication about complementary therapies and conventional medicine with their cancer patients, and to investigate how they experience interdisciplinary communication and cooperation. Method This study analyzed data from a self-administrated questionnaire. A total of 606 different health care providers, from four counties in Norway, completed the questionnaire. The survey was developed to describe aspects of the communication pattern among oncology doctors, nurses, family physicians and complementary therapists (acupuncturists, massage therapists and reflexologists/zone-therapists). Between-group differences were analyzed using chi-square, ANOVA and Fisher’s exact tests. Significance level was defined as p < 0.05 without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Result Conventional providers and complementary therapists had different patterns of communication with their cancer patients regarding complementary therapies. While complementary therapists advised their patients to apply both complementary and conventional modalities, medical doctors were less supportive of their patients’ use of complementary therapies. Of conventional providers, nurses expressed more positive attitudes toward complementary therapies. Opportunities to improve communication between conventional and complementary providers were most strongly supported by complementary providers and nurses; medical doctors were less supportive of such attempts. A number of doctors showed lack of respect for complementary therapists, but asked for more research, guidelines for complementary modalities and training in conventional medicine for complementary therapists. Conclusion For better quality of care, greater communication about complementary therapy use is needed between cancer patients and their conventional and complementary providers. In addition, more communication between conventional and complementary providers is needed. Nurses may have a crucial role in facilitating communication, as they are positive toward complementary therapies and they have more direct communication with patients about their treatment preferences.
Collapse
|
34
|
Hansen AH, Kristoffersen AE. The use of CAM providers and psychiatric outpatient services in people with anxiety/depression: a cross-sectional survey. Altern Ther Health Med 2016; 16:461. [PMID: 27835971 PMCID: PMC5106802 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1446-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Accepted: 11/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression has been identified as one of the most frequent predictors of CAM use. However, limited data exist about the use of CAM providers among people with anxiety/depression in Norway. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of CAM providers, and the use of CAM providers and psychiatric outpatient services in combination, among people with self-reported anxiety and/or depression. METHODS We used questionnaire data from 12,982 participants (30-87 years) in the cross-sectional sixth Tromsø Study (conducted in 2007-8). Eligible for analyses in our study were 1685 participants who reported suffering from anxiety and/or depression. By descriptive statistical methods, we estimated the use of CAM providers, psychiatric outpatient services, and the combination of these. By logistic regressions we studied the association between the use of these services and gender, age, income, education, and self-reported degree of anxiety/depression. RESULTS During the previous year, 17.8 % of people with anxiety/depression visited a CAM provider once or more, 11.8 % visited psychiatric outpatient services, and 2.5 % visited both. Men with anxiety/depression were less likely to visit CAM providers compared to women (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.55), whereas higher educated people were more likely to visit compared to the lowest educated (OR 1.47, CI 1.02-2.13). The use of CAM providers was not associated with the degree of anxiety/depression. For those who used both CAM providers and psychiatric specialist services during the previous year, severe anxiety/depression was strongly associated with use compared to moderate disease (OR 7.53, CI 2.75-20.65). CONCLUSIONS People with severe anxiety/depression seem to use CAM providers and psychiatric services additionally, whereas those with moderate disease seem to use these services more as alternative pathways. CAM provider treatment might be a substitute for conventional care, particularly in patients with moderate disease.
Collapse
|
35
|
Stub T, Quandt SA, Arcury TA, Sandberg JC, Kristoffersen AE, Musial F, Salamonsen A. Perception of risk and communication among conventional and complementary health care providers involving cancer patients' use of complementary therapies: a literature review. BMC Complement Altern Med 2016; 16:353. [PMID: 27609097 PMCID: PMC5016861 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1326-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication between different health care providers (conventional and complementary) and cancer patients about their use of complementary therapies affects the health and safety of the patients. The aim of this study was to examine the qualitative research literature on the perception of and communication about the risk of complementary therapies between different health care providers and cancer patients. METHODS Systematic searches in six medical databases covering literature from 2000 to 2015 were performed. The studies were accessed according to the level of evidence and summarized into different risk situations. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the text data, and the codes were defined before and during the data analysis. RESULTS Twenty-nine papers were included in the primary analysis and five main themes were identified and discussed. The main risk situations identified were 1. Differences in treatment concepts and philosophical values among complementary and conventional health care providers. 2. Adverse effects from complementary products and herbs due to their contamination/toxicity and interactions with conventional cancer treatment. 3. Health care physicians and oncologists find it difficult to recommend many complementary modalities due to the lack of scientific evidence for their effect. 4. Lack of knowledge and information about complementary and conventional cancer treatments among different health care providers. CONCLUSION The risk of consuming herbs and products containing high level of toxins is a considerable threat to patient safety (direct risk). At the same time, the lack of scientific evidence of effect for many complementary therapies and differences in treatment philosophy among complementary and conventional health care providers potentially hinder effective communication about these threats with mutual patients (indirect risk). As such, indirect risk may pose an additional risk to patients who want to combine complementary therapies with conventional treatment in cancer care. Health care providers who care for cancer patients should be aware of these risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Stub
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC 27157 USA
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157 USA
- Present address: Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Sara A. Quandt
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC 27157 USA
| | - Thomas A. Arcury
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157 USA
| | - Joanne C. Sandberg
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157 USA
| | - Agnete E. Kristoffersen
- Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Frauke Musial
- Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Anita Salamonsen
- Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kristoffersen AE, Musial F, Hamre HJ, Björkman L, Stub T, Salamonsen A, Alræk T. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with health complaints attributed to former dental amalgam fillings. Eur J Integr Med 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2016.08.149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
37
|
Sirois FM, Salamonsen A, Kristoffersen AE. Reasons for continuing use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in students: a consumer commitment model. BMC Complement Altern Med 2016; 16:75. [PMID: 26911133 PMCID: PMC4765033 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1059-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Research on continued CAM use has been largely atheoretical and has not considered the broader range of psychological and behavioral factors that may be involved. The purpose of this study was to test a new conceptual model of commitment to CAM use that implicates utilitarian (trust in CAM) and symbolic (perceived fit with CAM) in psychological and behavioral dimensions of CAM commitment. Methods A student sample of CAM consumers, (N = 159) completed a survey about their CAM use, CAM-related values, intentions for future CAM use, CAM word-of-mouth behavior, and perceptions of being an ongoing CAM consumer. Results Analysis revealed that the utilitarian, symbolic, and CAM commitment variables were significantly related, with r’s ranging from .54 to .73. A series hierarchical regression analyses controlling for relevant demographic variables found that the utilitarian and symbolic values uniquely accounted for significant and substantial proportion of the variance in each of the three CAM commitment indicators (R2 from .37 to .57). Conclusions The findings provide preliminary support for the new model that posits that CAM commitment is a multi-dimensional psychological state with behavioral indicators. Further research with large-scale samples and longitudinal designs is warranted to understand the potential value of the new model.
Collapse
|
38
|
Sirois FM, Salamonsen A, Kristoffersen AE. Reasons for continuing use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in students: a consumer commitment model. Altern Ther Health Med 2016. [PMID: 26911133 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1059-3.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on continued CAM use has been largely atheoretical and has not considered the broader range of psychological and behavioral factors that may be involved. The purpose of this study was to test a new conceptual model of commitment to CAM use that implicates utilitarian (trust in CAM) and symbolic (perceived fit with CAM) in psychological and behavioral dimensions of CAM commitment. METHODS A student sample of CAM consumers, (N = 159) completed a survey about their CAM use, CAM-related values, intentions for future CAM use, CAM word-of-mouth behavior, and perceptions of being an ongoing CAM consumer. RESULTS Analysis revealed that the utilitarian, symbolic, and CAM commitment variables were significantly related, with r's ranging from .54 to .73. A series hierarchical regression analyses controlling for relevant demographic variables found that the utilitarian and symbolic values uniquely accounted for significant and substantial proportion of the variance in each of the three CAM commitment indicators (R(2) from .37 to .57). CONCLUSIONS The findings provide preliminary support for the new model that posits that CAM commitment is a multi-dimensional psychological state with behavioral indicators. Further research with large-scale samples and longitudinal designs is warranted to understand the potential value of the new model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuschia M Sirois
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.,Department of Psychology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada
| | - Anita Salamonsen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kristoffersen AE, Musial F, Hamre HJ, Björkman L, Stub T, Salamonsen A, Alræk T. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with health complaints attributed to former dental amalgam fillings. Altern Ther Health Med 2016; 16:22. [PMID: 26801898 PMCID: PMC4722717 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-0996-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 01/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The dental filling material amalgam is generally well tolerated. However, a small proportion of dental patients experience health complaints which they attribute to amalgam. The symptom pattern is often similar to patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) and the health complaints may persist after amalgam removal. Among patients with MUPS, the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) seems to be high. The aim of this survey was to describe the prevalence and range of CAM use among people with health complaints attributed to dental amalgam fillings in which the health problems persist after the removal of all amalgam fillings. Specific attention was paid to (1) self-reported effects of CAM, (2) differences in CAM use dependent on self-reported health, and (3) gender differences in self-reported CAM use. METHODS A survey was distributed to all members of The Norwegian dental patient association (NDPA) (n = 999), the response rate was 36.4%. The anonymous questionnaire asked for socio-demographic data, health complaints related to former amalgam fillings, subjectively perceived health status, symptoms, and experience with therapeutic interventions, mostly from the spectrum of CAM. Only participants who had all their fillings removed, which was the vast majority, were analysed. RESULTS A total of 88.9% of included respondents had used at least one CAM modality, with a higher proportion of men (95.7%) compared to women (86.2%, p = 0.015). The most frequently used therapies were dietary supplements, vitamins and minerals recommended by a therapist (used by 66.7%) followed by self-prescribed dietary supplements, vitamins and minerals (59.0%), homeopathy (54.0%), acupuncture (48.8%) and special diets (47.5%). Use of CAM was similar for participants reporting normal to good health compared to participants reporting poor health. For all but two CAM modalities, the self-reported treatment effect was better in the group reporting normal to good health compared to the group reporting poor health. CONCLUSIONS CAM was widely used by participants in our study, a finding similar to findings from studies of MUPS patients. To date, health problems associated with the use of dental amalgam is not an accepted diagnosis in the healthcare system. Consequently, people suffering from such complaints experience a lack of adequate treatment and support within conventional health care, which might have contributed to the high number of CAM users in this study.
Collapse
|
40
|
Stub T, Kristoffersen AE, Alræk T, Musial F, Steinsbekk A. Risk in homeopathy: Classification of adverse events and homeopathic aggravations--A cross sectional study among Norwegian homeopath patients. Complement Ther Med 2015; 23:535-43. [PMID: 26275646 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2014] [Revised: 06/04/2015] [Accepted: 06/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED The registration of adverse events is important to identify treatment that might impose risk to patients. Homeopathic aggravation, a concept unique for homeopathy may impose a particular risk, as it is tolerant towards a worsening of the patients' symptoms. The aim of this study was to explore the classification of patient reported reactions as homeopathic aggravations or adverse drug reactions. DESIGN AND SETTING In a cross sectional survey, patients were asked to register any reactions they had experienced 14 days after taking homeopathic remedies. Worsening of symptoms was classified as homeopathic aggravation if it was (i) an increase of the patients' existing symptoms (ii) and/or a feeling of well-being that emerged 1-3 days after taking the remedy (iii) and/or headache and/or fatigue accompanying these symptoms. RESULTS A total of 26% of the participants reported worsening of symptoms. One third was classified as adverse events. Half of these were graded as minor and the other half as moderate according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Two thirds were classified as homeopathic aggravations. Of these, 73% were classified as minor and 27% as moderate, giving a tendency towards milder severity for those classified as homeopathic aggravations (p=0.065). CONCLUSION Patients reported a substantial part of the short-term reactions after taking homeopathic remedy as a worsening of symptoms. These reactions were classified as mild and moderate. Hence, the risk connected to homeopathic treatment is minor. More studies are needed to confirm the existence of homeopathic aggravation and how to classify the concept in a clinically meaningful way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Stub
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM) Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Agnete E Kristoffersen
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM) Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Terje Alræk
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM) Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Frauke Musial
- The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM) Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Aslak Steinsbekk
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Public Health and General Practice, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hansen AH, Kristoffersen AE, Lian OS, Halvorsen PA. Continuity of GP care is associated with lower use of complementary and alternative medical providers: a population-based cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:629. [PMID: 25491638 PMCID: PMC4267429 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0629-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2014] [Accepted: 12/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuity of general practitioner (GP) care is associated with reduced use of emergency departments, hospitalisation, and outpatient specialist services. Evidence about the relationship between continuity and use of complementary and alternative medical (CAM) providers has so far been lacking. The aim of this study was to test the association between continuity of GP care and the use of CAM providers. METHODS We used questionnaire data from the sixth Tromsø Study, conducted in 2007-8. Using descriptive statistical methods, we estimated the proportion using a CAM provider among adults (30-87 years) who had visited a GP during the last 12 months. By means of logistic regressions, we studied the association between the duration of the GP-patient relationship and the use of CAM providers. Analyses were adjusted for the frequency of GP visits, gender, age, marital status, income, education, and self-rated health and other proxies for health care needs. RESULTS Of 9,743 eligible GP users, 85.1% had seen the same GP for more than two years, 83.7% among women and 86.9% among men. The probability of visiting a CAM provider was lower among those with a GP relationship of more than 2 years compared to those with a shorter GP relationship (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.96). Other factors associated with CAM use were female gender, poor health, low age and high income. There was no association with education. CONCLUSIONS Continuity of GP care as measured by the duration of the GP-patient relationship was associated with lower use of CAM providers. Together with previous studies this suggests that continuity of GP care may contribute to health care delivery from fewer providers.
Collapse
|
42
|
Kristoffersen AE, Stub T, Salamonsen A, Musial F, Hamberg K. Gender differences in prevalence and associations for use of CAM in a large population study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2014; 14:463. [PMID: 25465676 PMCID: PMC4265502 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2014] [Accepted: 11/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-reported use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) varies widely from 10% to 75% in the general populations worldwide. When limited to use of a CAM provider 2% to 49% reported use is found. CAM use is believed to be closely associated with socio demographic variables such as gender, age, education, income and health complaints. However, studies have only occasionally differentiated CAM use according to gender. Therefore, the aim of the study presented here is to describe the prevalence of CAM use on the background of gender and to describe the specific characteristics of male and female users in the total Tromsø 6 population. METHODS A total of 12,982 men and women aged 30-87 in the municipality of Tromsø, Norway went through a health screening program and completed two self-administered questionnaires in 2007/2008. The questionnaires were developed specifically for the Tromsø study and included questions about life style and health issues in addition to socio demographic variables. RESULTS A total of 33% of the participants reported use of any CAM within the last 12 months, women more often than men (42% and 24%, respectively). When limited to visits to a CAM provider, we found 17% use among women and 8% among men. The relationship between the demographic variables and being a CAM user differed significantly between men and women with regard to age, household income, and marital status. We did not find significant differences between men and women concerning education and self-reported health. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this study suggest that the prevalence and associations for use of CAM differ between men and women concerning several socio demographic variables (age, education and household income). Neglect of women's health care needs in public health care may contribute to the fact that women to a higher degree than men turn to CAM and CAM products.
Collapse
|
43
|
Kristoffersen AE, Norheim AJ, Fønnebø VM. Any difference? Use of a CAM provider among cancer patients, coronary heart disease (CHD) patients and individuals with no cancer/CHD. Altern Ther Health Med 2012; 12:1. [PMID: 22240073 PMCID: PMC3305410 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2011] [Accepted: 01/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Although use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among cancer patients has been described previously, prevalence of use has not commonly been compared to other disease groups in a true population sample where CAM use or cancer is not the main focus. The aims of the present study are to (1) examine how CAM use in cancer patients differs from people with a previous CHD diagnosis and people with no cancer or CHD diagnosis in an unselected general population and (2), investigate the use of a CAM provider among individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis. Methods A total of 8040 men and women aged 29 to 87 in the city of Tromsø, Norway filled in a questionnaire developed specifically for the Tromsø V study with questions on life style and health issues. Visits to a CAM provider within the last 12 months and information on cancer, heart attack and angina pectoris (heart cramp) were among the questions. 1449 respondents were excluded from the analyses. Results Among the 6591 analysed respondents 331 had a prior cancer diagnosis, of whom 7.9% reported to have seen a CAM provider within the last 12 months. This did not differ significantly from neither the CHD group (6.4%, p = 0.402) nor the no cancer/CHD group (9.5%, p = 0.325). Conclusion According to this study, the proportion of cancer patients seeing a CAM provider was not statistically significantly different from patients with CHD or individuals without cancer or CHD.
Collapse
|
44
|
Quandt SA, Verhoef MJ, Arcury TA, Lewith GT, Steinsbekk A, Kristoffersen AE, Wahner-Roedler DL, Fønnebø V. Development of an international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-Q). J Altern Complement Med 2009; 15:331-9. [PMID: 19388855 PMCID: PMC3189003 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2008.0521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Existing studies on the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) have produced diverse results regarding the types and prevalence of CAM use due, in part, to variations in the measurement of CAM modalities. A questionnaire that can be adapted for use in a variety of populations will improve CAM utilization measurement. The purposes of this article are to (1) articulate the need for such a common questionnaire; (2) describe the process of questionnaire development; (3) present a model questionnaire with core questions; and (4) suggest standard techniques for adapting the questionnaire to different languages and populations. METHODS An international workshop sponsored by the National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM) of the University of Tromsø, Norway, brought CAM researchers and practitioners together to design an international CAM questionnaire (I-CAM-Q). Existing questionnaires were critiqued, and working groups drafted content for a new questionnaire. A smaller working group completed, tested, and revised this self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS The questionnaire that was developed contains four sections concerned with visits to health care providers, complementary treatments received from physicians, use of herbal medicine and dietary supplements, and self-help practices. A priori-specified practitioners, therapies, supplements, and practices are included, as well as places for researcher-specified and respondent-specified additions. Core questions are designed to elicit frequency of use, purpose (treatment of acute or chronic conditions, and health maintenance), and satisfaction. A penultimate version underwent pretesting with "think-aloud" techniques to identify problems related to meaning and format. The final questionnaire is presented, with suggestions for testing and translating. CONCLUSIONS Once validated in English and non-English speaking populations, the I-CAM-Q will provide an opportunity for researchers to gather comparable data in studies conducted in different populations. Such data will increase knowledge about the epidemiology of CAM use and provide the foundation for evidence-based comparisons at an international level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara A Quandt
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1063, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|