Convergent evolution of BRCA2 reversion mutations under therapeutic pressure by PARP inhibition and platinum chemotherapy

Reversion mutations that restore wild-type function of the BRCA gene have been described as a key mechanism of resistance to Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy in BRCA-associated cancers. Here, we report a case of a patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with a germline BRCA2 mutation who developed acquired resistance to PARP inhibition. Extensive genomic interrogation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and tissue at baseline, post-progression, and postmortem revealed ten unique BRCA2 reversion mutations across ten sites. While several of the reversion mutations were private to a specific site, nine out of ten tumors contained at least one mutation, suggesting a powerful clonal selection for reversion mutations in the presence of therapeutic pressure by PARP inhibition. Variable cfDNA shed was seen across tumor sites, emphasizing a potential shortcoming of cfDNA monitoring for PARPi resistance. This report provides a genomic portrait of the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of prostate cancer under the selective pressure of a PARP inhibition and exposes limitations in the current strategies for detection of reversion mutations.

Discovery and Clinical Proof-of-Concept of RLY-2608, a First-in-Class Mutant-Selective Allosteric PI3Kα Inhibitor That Decouples Antitumor Activity from Hyperinsulinemia

PIK3CA (PI3Kα) is a lipid kinase commonly mutated in cancer, including ∼40% of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The most frequently observed mutants occur in the kinase and helical domains. Orthosteric PI3Kα inhibitors suffer from poor selectivity leading to undesirable side effects, most prominently hyperglycemia due to inhibition of wild-type (WT) PI3Kα. Here, we used molecular dynamics simulations and cryo-electron microscopy to identify an allosteric network that provides an explanation for how mutations favor PI3Kα activation. A DNA-encoded library screen leveraging electron microscopy-optimized constructs, differential enrichment, and an orthosteric-blocking compound led to the identification of RLY-2608, a first-in-class allosteric mutant-selective inhibitor of PI3Kα. RLY-2608 inhibited tumor growth in PIK3CA-mutant xenograft models with minimal impact on insulin, a marker of dysregulated glucose homeostasis. RLY-2608 elicited objective tumor responses in two patients diagnosed with advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with kinase or helical domain PIK3CA mutations, with no observed WT PI3Kα-related toxicities.

SIGNIFICANCE

Treatments for PIK3CA-mutant cancers are limited by toxicities associated with the inhibition of WT PI3Kα. Molecular dynamics, cryo-electron microscopy, and DNA-encoded libraries were used to develop RLY-2608, a first-in-class inhibitor that demonstrates mutant selectivity in patients. This marks the advance of clinical mutant-selective inhibition that overcomes limitations of orthosteric PI3Kα inhibitors. See related commentary by Gong and Vanhaesebroeck, p. 204 . See related article by Varkaris et al., p. 227 . This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 201.

A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of LY3405105, a Covalent Inhibitor of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 7, Administered to Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and preliminary activity of LY3405105, a covalent inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7), in patients with advanced solid tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

LY3405105 monotherapy was given once daily (QD; part A1) or thrice weekly (TIW; part A2) starting at 1 and 2 mg orally, respectively, and escalated per a Bayesian design in adult patients. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included PKs and antitumor activity.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were enrolled: 43 in part A1 and 11 in part A2. Seven patients had dose-limiting toxicities, all in part A1 (45 mg: n = 3; 35 mg: n = 3; 25 mg: n = 1). Thirty-five patients (64.8%) reported at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). TRAEs (≥10%) were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, abdominal pain, anemia, asthenia, and decreased platelet count. QD dosing showed sustained exposure with less peak-trough fluctuation compared to TIW dosing. Median time to maximum concentration was 1-2 hours and half-life was 15-19 hours. CDK7-target occupancy in skin and peripheral blood on day 15 was dose-dependent and reached near maximal occupancy of 75% at ≥15 mg QD. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 20 mg QD. Twelve patients in part A1 (27.9%) and 5 patients in part A2 (45.5%) had a best overall response of stable disease. No complete response or partial response was observed.

CONCLUSION

The MTD of LY3405105 monotherapy was 20 mg QD. The most common toxicities were gastrointestinal adverse events, myelosuppression, fatigue, and asthenia. Limited clinical activity was observed in this phase I trial, and there are no plans for further development.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03770494.

RLY-4008, the First Highly Selective FGFR2 Inhibitor with Activity across FGFR2 Alterations and Resistance Mutations

Oncogenic activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) drives multiple cancers and represents a broad therapeutic opportunity, yet selective targeting of FGFR2 has not been achieved. Although the clinical efficacy of pan-FGFR inhibitors (pan-FGFRi) validates FGFR2 driver status in FGFR2 fusion-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, their benefit is limited by incomplete target coverage due to FGFR1- and FGFR4-mediated toxicities (hyperphosphatemia and diarrhea, respectively) and the emergence of FGFR2 resistance mutations. RLY-4008 is a highly selective, irreversible FGFR2 inhibitor designed to overcome these limitations. In vitro, RLY-4008 demonstrates >250- and >5,000-fold selectivity over FGFR1 and FGFR4, respectively, and targets primary alterations and resistance mutations. In vivo, RLY-4008 induces regression in multiple xenograft models-including models with FGFR2 resistance mutations that drive clinical progression on current pan-FGFRi-while sparing FGFR1 and FGFR4. In early clinical testing, RLY-4008 induced responses without clinically significant off-isoform FGFR toxicities, confirming the broad therapeutic potential of selective FGFR2 targeting.

SIGNIFICANCE

Patients with FGFR2-driven cancers derive limited benefit from pan-FGFRi due to multiple FGFR1-4-mediated toxicities and acquired FGFR2 resistance mutations. RLY-4008 is a highly selective FGFR2 inhibitor that targets primary alterations and resistance mutations and induces tumor regression while sparing other FGFRs, suggesting it may have broad therapeutic potential. See related commentary by Tripathi et al., p. 1964. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 1949.

Abstract OT3-22-01: First-in-human global multi-center study of RLY-2608, a pan mutant and isoform selective PI3Kα inhibitor, as a single agent in advanced solid tumor patients and in combination with fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer

Background: Targeting constitutively active mutant kinases with selective small molecule inhibitors is a key therapeutic pillar of precision oncology. Phosphatidylinositol-4,5bisphosphate-3 kinase, catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutations leading to oncogenic activation of PI3Kα represent the largest opportunity for this approach in solid tumors. However, there is no selective inhibitor that targets mutant PI3Kα in the clinic. Toxicity related to non-selective inhibition of WT PI3Kα (hyperglycemia) and other PI3K isoforms limits the tolerability, dosing and efficacy of the orthosteric inhibitor, alpelisib, the only approved solid tumor PI3K inhibitor. RLY-2608, a novel oral allosteric PI3Kα inhibitor, is uniquely designed to overcome these limitations via mutant- and isoform-selective PI3Kα inhibition for greater target coverage, improved tolerability and antitumor activity. We initiated a first-in-human (FIH), study to evaluate the clinical activity of RLY-2608 as a single agent in advanced solid tumor patients (pts) with PI3KCA mutations and in combination with fulvestrant in pts with PIK3CA mutant, HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: This is a global, multi-center, dose escalation/expansion study (NCT05216432) of RLY2608 as a single agent in adults who have advanced solid tumors and are refractory, intolerant, or declined standard therapy and RLY-2608 in combination with fulvestrant in previously treated pts with HR+/HER2- MBC. Eligibility criteria include presence of PI3KCA mutation (blood or tumor) per local assessment, ECOG performance status 0-1, measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1 and no prior PI3K inhibitor (except combination group 2). RLY-2608 is administered on a continuous schedule with 4-week cycles. Adverse events (AEs) per CTCAE v5, PK, biomarkers (mutant ctDNAs and insulin pathway markers) and anti-tumor activity are assessed serially. Dose escalation employs a Bayesian Optimal Interval design to identify MTD and RP2D. Following dose escalation, pts will be treated with RLY-2608 at the MTD/RP2D in a monotherapy dose expansion with 5 groups (N=75, 15 each): 1. Clear cell ovarian carcinoma 2. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma 3. Cervical cancer 4. Other solid tumors 5. PI3KCA double mutations. In addition, two expansion cohorts will enroll patients with HR+/HER2- MBC treated with RLY-2608 and fulvestrant combination (N = 30, 15 each): 1. No prior PI3K therapy 2. Intolerant to PI3K inhibitors. The primary endpoints are MTD/RP2D and AE profile for single agent and combination; key secondary endpoints are PI3KCA genotype in blood and tumor, PK, biomarkers, and overall response rate. US enrollment began December 2021 and ex-USA startup is under way.

Citation Format: Andreas Varkaris, Erika Hamilton, Jason Henry, Alexander I. Spira, Alison M. Schram, Julia E. McGuinness, Gege Tan, Xiaoyan Li, Tamieka Hunter, Ramin Samadani, Alison Timm, Djuro Karanovic, Vivek Subbiah, Cesar A. Perez. First-in-human global multi-center study of RLY-2608, a pan mutant and isoform selective PI3Kα inhibitor, as a single agent in advanced solid tumor patients and in combination with fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-22-01.

Avelumab Plus Talazoparib in Patients With BRCA1/2- or ATM-Altered Advanced Solid Tumors: Results From JAVELIN BRCA/ATM, an Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2b, Tumor-Agnostic Trial

Importance

Nonclinical studies suggest that the combination of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitors has enhanced antitumor activity; however, the patient populations that may benefit from this combination have not been identified.

Objective

To evaluate whether the combination of avelumab and talazoparib is effective in patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 or ATM alterations, regardless of tumor type.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this pan-cancer tumor-agnostic phase 2b nonrandomized controlled trial, patients with advanced BRCA1/2-altered or ATM-altered solid tumors were enrolled into 2 respective parallel cohorts. The study was conducted from July 2, 2018, to April 12, 2020, at 42 institutions in 9 countries.

Interventions

Patients received 800 mg of avelumab every 2 weeks and 1 mg of talazoparib once daily.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was confirmed objective response (OR) per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review.

Results

A total of 200 patients (median [range] age, 59.0 [26.0-89.0] years; 132 [66.0%] women; 15 [7.5%] Asian, 11 [5.5%] African American, and 154 [77.0%] White participants) were enrolled: 159 (79.5%) in the BRCA1/2 cohort and 41 (20.5%) in the ATM cohort. The confirmed OR rate was 26.4% (42 patients, including 9 complete responses [5.7%]) in the BRCA1/2 cohort and 4.9% (2 patients) in the ATM cohort. In the BRCA1/2 cohort, responses were more frequent (OR rate, 30.3%; 95% CI, 22.2%-39.3%, including 8 complete responses [6.7%]) and more durable (median duration of response: 10.9 months [95% CI, 6.2 months to not estimable]) in tumor types associated with increased heritable cancer risk (ie, BRCA1/2-associated cancer types, such as ovarian, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers) and in uterine leiomyosarcoma (objective response in 3 of 3 patients and with ongoing responses greater than 24 months) compared with non-BRCA-associated cancer types. Responses in the BRCA1/2 cohort were numerically higher for patients with tumor mutational burden of 10 or more mutations per megabase (mut/Mb) vs less than 10 mut/Mb. The combination was well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this phase 2b nonrandomized controlled trial, neither the BRCA1/2 nor ATM cohort met the prespecified OR rate of 40%. Antitumor activity for the combination of avelumab and talazoparib in patients with BRCA1/2 alterations was observed in some patients with BRCA1/2-associated tumor types and uterine leiomyosarcoma; benefit was minimal in non-BRCA-associated cancer types.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03565991.

Avelumab Plus Talazoparib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: The JAVELIN PARP Medley Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Preclinical data suggest that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have synergistic activity when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); however, it is unknown which tumor types or molecular subtypes may benefit from this combination.

Objective

To investigate responses associated with the combination of avelumab and talazoparib in different tumor types and/or molecular subtypes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this phase 1b and 2 basket nonrandomized controlled trial, patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in the following cohorts: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); DNA damage response (DDR)-positive NSCLC; triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2)-negative, DDR-positive breast cancer; recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (OC); recurrent, platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered OC; urothelial cancer; metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); DDR-positive mCRPC; and BRCA1/2- or ATM-altered solid tumors. Data were analyzed between June 17, 2021, and August 6, 2021.

Interventions

All patients in phases 1b and 2 received avelumab plus talazoparib.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The phase 1b primary end point was dose-limiting toxic effects. The phase 2 primary end point was objective response, measured as objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included safety, time to response, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression and PSA response of 50% or greater (for mCRPC), cancer antigen 125 response (for OC), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarkers.

Results

A total of 223 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [11.0] years; 117 [52.5%] men) were treated, including 12 patients in phase 1b and 211 patients in phase 2. The recommended phase 2 dose was avelumab 800 mg every 2 weeks plus talazoparib 1 mg once daily. In phase 2, the ORR was 18.2% (95% CI, 5.2%-40.3%) in patients with TNBC; 34.8% (95% CI, 16.4%-57.3%) in patients with HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC; and 63.6% (95% CI, 30.8%-89.1%) in patients with platinum-sensitive, BRCA1/2-altered OC. Responses occurred more frequently in patients with BRCA1/2-altered tumors. Durable responses were observed in patients with TNBC (median [range] DOR, 11.1 [3.4-20.4] months); HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC (median [range] DOR, 15.7 [3.9 to ≥20.6] months); and BRCA1/2-altered OC (median DOR not reached; range, 5.6 to ≥18.4 months). The most common grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events were anemia (75 patients [33.6%]), thrombocytopenia (48 patients [21.5%]), and neutropenia (31 patients [13.9%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

This nonrandomized controlled trial found that ORRs for avelumab plus talazoparib were comparable with those with PARP inhibitor or ICI monotherapy. Prolonged DOR in patients with TNBC; HR-positive, ERBB2-negative, and DDR-positive BC; and BRCA1/2-altered OC warrant further investigation in randomized clinical trials. These data highlight the importance of prospective patient selection in future studies of ICI and PARP-inhibitor combinations.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03330405.

Reversion mutations in germline BRCA1/2-mutant tumors reveal a BRCA-mediated phenotype in non-canonical histologies

The association between loss of BRCA1/2 and a homologous recombination deficiency phenotype is lineage dependent. In BRCA-associated cancers such as breast, ovarian, pancreas and prostate, this phenotype confers sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and platinum-therapies. Somatic reversion mutations restoring BRCA1/2 function mediate resistance, and have exclusively been reported in BRCA-associated tumors. In this study, we analyze matched tumor and normal sequencing from 31,927 patients and identify 846 (2.7%) patients with germline BRCA1/2 variants across 43 different cancer types, including 11 with somatic reversion mutations. While nine are in BRCA-associated tumors, we find two reversion mutations in non-BRCA-associated histologies, namely lung and esophagogastric adenocarcinomas. Both were detected following platinum therapy. Whole exome sequencing confirms the homologous recombination deficiency phenotype of these tumors. While reversion mutations arise in all BRCA-associated cancer types, here we show that reversion mutations arising post-platinum in non-BRCA associated histologies, while rare, may indicate BRCA1/2 mediated tumorigenesis.

Abstract CT007: PETRA: First in class, first in human trial of the next generation PARP1-selective inhibitor AZD5305 in patients (pts) with BRCA1/2, PALB2 or RAD51C/D mutations

Background: AZD5305 is a potent, highly selective PARP1 inhibitor and trapper with superior preclinical tolerability, target engagement and efficacy vs 1st generation dual PARP1/2 inhibitors (PARPi). This is the first report of the ongoing Phase 1/2a PETRA (NCT04644068) trial.

Methods: Pts with advanced breast, ovarian, prostate or pancreatic cancer bearing germline or somatic BRCA1/2, PALB2 or RAD51C/D mutations received AZD5305 QD PO until disease progression. ECOG PS 0-2 and Hb ≥9.0 g/dL were required. Prior PARPi and platinum therapy were permitted. The primary objective was safety; secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics in tumor and/or blood samples and response by RECIST v1.1, CA125 or PSA. Exploratory genomic analyses included zygosity evaluation and ctDNA response monitoring.

Results: At data cutoff (Nov 17, 2021), 46 pts received AZD5305 10-90 mg QD (43.5% had prior PARPi; median 3.5 prior lines of therapy). AZD5305 was well tolerated across all doses without DLTs (Table). PK exposures were dose-proportional. Steady-state Ctrough was higher than 1st generation PARPi: specifically 6.3 and 31.9 fold above target effective concentration at 10 and 90 mg, respectively. PARylation inhibition was ≥90% at 10-40 mg QD (PBMCs) confirming target engagement. 7/25 (28%) pts had objective responses: 5 RECIST PRs (3 confirmed) and 2 additional pts with PSA50 responses (1 confirmed), including platinum- and PARPi-resistant pts. 13/22 (59%) RECIST-measurable pts had SD or PR up to 51+ weeks. ctDNA declined on treatment in 7/13 (54%) evaluable pts (3 complete, 4 >50% reductions) across doses.

Conclusions: AZD5305 is a highly selective PARP1 inhibitor and trapper with excellent physiochemical properties and a wide therapeutic index. It led to maximal target engagement and showed promising clinical activity with favorable tolerability at exposures surpassing those of 1st generation PARPi.

AZD5305 10 mg/d (n=8) AZD5305 20 mg/d (n=19) AZD5305 40 mg/d (n=13) AZD5305 60 mg/d (n=3) AZD5305 90 mg/d (n=3) Total (N=46) Most common (>10%) TRAEs, n (%) Any grade Any grade Any grade Any grade Any grade Grade ≥3 Any grade Nausea 3 (37.5) 5 (26.3) 1 (7.7) 1 (33.3) 0 0 10 (21.7) Anemia* 2 (25.0) 4 (21.1) 1 (7.7) 0 0 6 (13.0) 7 (15.2) Neutropenia* 3 (37.5) 2 (10.5) 1 (7.7) 0 1 (33.3) 2 (4.3) 7 (15.2) Thrombocytopenia* 1 (12.5) 2 (10.5) 2 (15.4) 0 0 1 (2.2) 5 (10.9) Fatigue and asthenia* 2 (25.0) 2 (10.5) 0 1 (33.3) 0 0 5 (10.9) Any TRAE leading to dose reduction 1 (12.5) 0 0 0 0 1 (2.2) Any TRAE leading to discontinuation 0 0 0 0 0 0 AE, adverse event; TRAE, treatment-related adverse event *Grouped Terms

Citation Format: Timothy A. Yap, Seock-Ah Im, Alison M. Schram, Adam Sharp, Judith Balmana, Richard D. Baird, Jessica S. Brown, Maria Schwaederle, Elizabeth A. Pilling, Ganesh Moorthy, Spiros Linardopoulos, Adam Dowson, Carol Pound, Edit Lukacs, Sabina Cosulich, Stephen J. Luen. PETRA: First in class, first in human trial of the next generation PARP1-selective inhibitor AZD5305 in patients (pts) with BRCA1/2, PALB2 or RAD51C/D mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT007.

Abstract LB089: Effective in vivo treatment of endometrial tumor models with coexistent mutant PI3K and PTEN inactivation with a selective bi-steric mTORC1 kinase inhibitor

Dysregulation of PI3K signaling is a common event in human cancer, but feedback inhibition of receptor kinase signaling and/or induction of PTEN translation by activated PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling reduces pathway output and tumor dependency. In some cancers, including the majority of endometrial carcinomas, these lesions coexist and cause synergistic hyperactivation of pathway output, particularly mTORC1 kinase signaling. Although this suggests that PI3K signaling is a driver of these endometrial cancers, standard inhibitors have had only marginal activity in patients with advanced disease. We here show that, in experimental isogenic models and PDX models with PI3K and PTEN alterations, PI3K inhibitors and rapalogs are weak inhibitors of TORC1 targets and slow but do not suppress the in vivo growth of these tumors. Revolution Medicines has developed a series of bi-steric selective and potent mTORC1 inhibitors that inhibit the phosphorylation of 4EBP-1, S6K and other mTORC1 substrates at concentrations that do not affect TORC2 substrates and thus do not induce the hyperglycemia caused by downregulation of AKT signaling by pan-mTOR kinase inhibitors. We have explored the biologic and anti-tumor effects of these inhibitors in models of endometrial cancer with coexistent PI3K mutation and PTEN inactivation. The mTORC1 kinase selective bi-steric inhibitor RMC-6272 can potently suppress both mTORC1 activity and the growth of these tumor cells in vitro. Moreover, in contrast to PI3K inhibition, RMC-6272 effectively inhibited the phosphorylation of mTORC1 kinase substrates and completely suppressed the growth in vivo of multiple PDXs with this genotype without inducing hyperglycemia or causing weight loss in the mice. The results suggest that dysregulation of TORC1 activity is an important driver of endometrial carcinomas with coexistent PTEN inactivation and PI3K mutations and that selective TORC1 kinase inhibitors may prove to be useful therapeutics in this context. The bi-steric mTORC1 kinase inhibitor RMC-5552 is the first clinical candidate of this class and clinical testing is ongoing (NCT04774952).

Citation Format: Hilla Solomon, Radha Mukherjee, Xiaoping Chen, HuiYong Zhao, Elisa de Stanchina, Britta Weigelt, Alison M. Schram, Carol Aghajanian, Mallika Singh, Jan Smith, Neal Rosen. Effective in vivo treatment of endometrial tumor models with coexistent mutant PI3K and PTEN inactivation with a selective bi-steric mTORC1 kinase inhibitor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr LB089.

A pilot study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced sarcoma

TPS11588

Background: New treatment options are needed for sarcomas. Pazopanib is the only targeted agent approved for multiple soft tissue sarcoma (STS) subtypes with a response rate of 6% and a PFS of 4.6 months. Immunotherapy has a limited role in STS, as the SARC028 study of pembrolizumab demonstrated an overall response rate of 18%, with the highest response rate seen in the undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) cohort at 23%. Lenvatinib is an oral, multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of multiple cancer types including progressive, radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with inhibitory activity against the receptor tyrosine kinases VEGFR 1-3, FGFR 1-3, KIT, PDGFR alpha/beta, and RET. Early outcomes with the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab suggest that this regimen could be broadly superior to PD-1 targeting alone for several tumor types as high rates of objective response have been noted. The rationale for this study is based on preclinical work demonstrating the immunosuppressive effects of VEGF in the tumor immune microenvironment including inhibition of dendritic cell maturation, recruitment of immunosuppressive Tregs, MDSCs and TAMs and up-regulation of PD-1 on CD8+ cells. Methods: This is a pilot study evaluating the efficacy of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in the treatment of select metastatic and/or unresectable sarcomas. Patients will be enrolled in one of five cohorts: Cohort A: leiomyosarcoma; Cohort B: UPS; Cohort C: vascular sarcomas (including angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma); Cohort D: synovial sarcoma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor; and Cohort E: bone sarcomas (limited to osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma). Eligible patients should have had at least one prior therapy for unresectable and/or metastatic disease, but no more than three prior lines of therapy. Prior treatment with angiogenesis inhibitors or immunotherapy is excluded. Archival tissue is required for eligibility. Patients enrolled in the study will be treated initially with a 2 week run-in of lenvatinib 20 mg orally daily which will be continued daily thereafter. Subsequently, they will start pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 21 days. The primary endpoint for each cohort is best overall response rate documented by RECIST v1.1 Criteria at 27 weeks. A sample size of 10 patients is planned for each of the five histological cohorts. If 2 or more confirmed responses are observed among the 10 patients in an arm, the drug combination will be considered positive and worthy of further investigation for that arm. Secondary endpoints are PFS, OS, duration of response and safety/tolerability of the combination. On-treatment biopsy and blood samples will be required for correlative assessments. Accrual in all cohorts is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04784247.

Dysfunctional CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment are associated with response to nivolumab in mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or hypermutated ovarian (OVCA) or endometrial cancer (EC)

5583

Background: EC and a subset of OVCA are associated with high rates of dMMR and are responsive to PD-1 blockade. It is unknown what additional biomarkers beyond dMMR may enrich for benefit in these patients (pts). Methods: This was an investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase II study. Eligible pts had recurrent EC or OVCA that met one of the following criteria: 1) dMMR, as determined by immunohistochemical loss of expression of 1+ MMR genes; 2) MSI-H, as determined by next generation sequencing (MSK-IMPACT); or 3) hypermutated, defined as 20+ non-synonymous somatic mutations. Pts received nivo 240mg IV every 2 weeks or 480mg IV every 4 weeks until toxicity or progression. The co-primary endpoints were 1) the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks (PFS24) and 2) the objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. The study was designed using Simon’s two-stage design, with a sample size of 40 pts based on a promising ORR of 25% with a type I error rate of 0.025 and a type II error rate of 0.05. Overall survival (OS), PFS and duration of response (DOR) were calculated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Adverse events (AEs) were graded per CTCAE and tabulated. Biomarker analyses on the available archival tissue were performed using multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) labeling for CD8, PD-1, TOX, PD-1, PD-L1, and FoxP3. Quantification of immune phenotypes and interaction studies between CD8+ T cells and PD-L1+ cells was performed in HALO. Results: Between 9/2017 and 5/2021, 35 pts were enrolled; the study closed early due to slow accrual. The median duration of follow-up was 33.2 months. The median age was 64 years (range 36-87); 82% of pts were white, 54% had high grade EC, and 65% had confirmed MLH1 hypermethylation. The ORR was 57.1% (97.5% CI 39.4-100%) [37% PR, 20% CR]. The PFS24 was 62.9% and median PFS was 26.7 months (95% CI 4.9-NE). Neither median DOR nor OS was reached. OS at 1 year was 76.4% (95% CI 58.2-87.4%). The ORR in patients with MLH1 hypermethylation was 52%; 4 of 5 patients with confirmed germline MMR alterations had a response by RECIST. AEs were consistent with the reported literature. Notable treatment related AEs included Grade 4 myocarditis with associated grade 4 AV block, grade 2 extraocular paresis, grade 3 Type 1 diabetes mellitus, and grade 3 elevations in AST/ALT. On mIF analysis, PD-L1 expression did not distinguish responders from non-responders, though interaction between CD8+ T cells and PD-L1+ cells was associated with CR/PR. Increase in relative fraction of dysfunctional CD8+ T cells (characterized by CD8+TOX+PD-1+ phenotype) was also associated with CR/PR. Conclusions: Nivo is an effective and tolerable treatment option for patients with MMR-D/MSI-H or hypermutated EC or OVCA. Presence of dysfunctional CD8+ T cells in the tumors was associated with response, while expression of PD-L1 was not predictive. Clinical trial information: NCT03241745.

Efficacy and safety of zenocutuzumab, a HER2 x HER3 bispecific antibody, across advanced NRG1 fusion (NRG1+) cancers

105

Background: NRG1 fusions are rare oncogenic drivers that have been identified in a variety of solid tumors. These proteins bind HER3, leading to HER2/HER3 heterodimerization and oncogenic transformation. Zenocutuzumab (MCLA-128; Zeno) is a Biclonics antibody that overcomes HER3 mediated NRG1 (or NRG1 fusion) signaling in tumor cells. Zeno docks on HER2, then binds to and blocks the NRG1 fusion-HER3 interaction and HER3 heterodimerization with HER2. Zeno is being evaluated in patients (pts) with NRG1+ cancer in the ongoing pivotal phase 2 part of the eNRGy study and early access program (EAP). Methods: Pts with NRG1 + solid tumors previously treated with or not candidates for standard therapy, aged ≥ 18 years, with ECOG PS ≤ 2, and measurable (RECIST 1.1) or evaluable disease, were enrolled. NRG1 fusions were determined by next generation sequencing (NGS) before enrollment. Zeno (750 mg IV Q2W) was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor imaging was conducted every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint is investigator (INV)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR) and safety. Results: As of 12 Jan 2022, 99 pts with NRG1 + cancer (85 eNRGy, 14 EAP) were enrolled. Efficacy was assessed in 73 pts who received ≥ 1 dose of Zeno and who were enrolled as of 12 Jul 2021 to allow for the opportunity to have ≥ 6 months (mo) follow-up and met the criteria for the primary efficacy population. Median age was 59 y (range 22–84), 58% were female, 47%/53% pts had ECOG PS 0/1. Tumor types were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 41 pts), pancreas cancer (18 pts), breast cancer (5 pts), cholangiocarcinoma (3 pts), colorectal cancer (2 pts), and 4 other tumor types (1 pt each), with a median 2 prior systemic therapies (range 0-9). The most frequent fusion partners were CD74 (27%), SLC3A2 (18%), and ATP1B1 (15%). Among the 71 pts with measurable disease, the INV-assessed confirmed ORR was 34% (90% CI, 25;44), including responses in NSCLC (35%; 14/40 pts), pancreas cancer (39%; 7/18 pts), breast cancer (2/4 pts), and cholangiocarcinoma (1/3 pts). Responses occurred at the first tumor assessment in 20/24 responders, and are ongoing in 13 pts. Treatment is ongoing in 22 pts (13 NSCLC, 6 pancreas, 3 other solid tumors). Median DOR was 9.1 mo (95% CI, 5.2-12.0). Kaplan-Meier estimate of DOR rate at 6 mo was 70%. Among the 208 pts treated with Zeno monotherapy across all dosing schedules in the phase 2 setting, for individual adverse events irrespective of causality, grade ≥ 3 events were reported in <5% of pts. Conclusions: Zeno demonstrated robust and durable efficacy in pts with advanced NRG1+ cancer regardless of tumor histology. A well tolerated safety profile of Zeno was observed. Clinical trial information: NCT02912949.

Clinicopathologic characterization of ERK2 E322K mutation in solid tumors: Implications for treatment and drug development

3135

Background: MAPK1 encodes ERK2, a kinase component of the mitogen activated signaling (MAPK) pathway. ERK2 E322K is a known activating mutation that leads to increased phosphorylation and ERK signaling. In vitro studies found this mutation to be associated with resistance to dabrafenib, trametinib, but potential sensitivity to ERK inhibitors. Despite its potential as a drug target, little is known about the clinicopathologic characteristics of this hotspot mutation across solid tumors. Methods: Patients with solid tumors underwent tumor next-generation sequencing at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between Jan 2015 and Sep 2020 using the MSK-IMPACT assay. Using the cBioPortal database and clinical charts, we analyzed tumors harboring MAPK1/ERK2 E322K mutations, assessed their clinicopathologic characteristics, co-mutational status and overall survival (OS). OS was measured from time of tumor sequencing to date of death or last follow-up. Results: A total of 37 tumor samples from 35 patients were identified in 59,822 tumors sequenced (0.06%) to harbor an ERK2 E322K mutation. The distribution across tumor types was as follows: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (29%), bladder cancer (20%), lymphomas (9%), colorectal cancers (9%), gastric cancers (9%), cholangiocarcinoma (6%), cervical cancers (6%), lung cancers (6%), germ cell tumor (3%), Merkel cell carcinoma (3%), and breast cancers (3%). The OS in patients with metastatic disease and ERK2 E322K was 22.29 months (95%CI: 7.56-NA) months. Other mutations in RAS pathway frequently co-occurred with ERK2 E322K mutation (17/37, 46%). Concurrent mutations are also involved in pathways of cell cycle (71%), PI3K (71%), TP53 (66%), NOTCH (57%), RTK (51%), HIPPO (29%), TGF-beta (29%), WNT (26%), NRF2 (20%), MYC (14%). The median TMB score of samples from solid malignancies was 12.3 (range:0-101, quartiles: 6.9-33.0) mutation/Mb. Two patients (2/35, 6%) had microsatellite-instability high (MSI-H) tumors. The most frequent concurrent activating mutations include ARID1A (29%), FBXW7 (26%), PI3KCA (22%), PI3KR1/2/3 (20%), CDKN2A (11%), PTEN (8%), BRCA1/2(8%), FGFR3 (8%), BRAF (6%), Only one of these 35 patients received treatment targeting BRAF/MEK/ERK pathway and achieved partial response. One patient with NSCLC harboring a concurrent EGFR L858R mutation did not respond to erlotinib. One patient with PI3KCA mutated head and neck cancer did not respond to PI3K inhibitor. Two patients had TMB score of 100.9 and 12.9 mutation/Mb had partial response to pembrolizumab. Conclusions: ERK2 E322K mutation is a rare oncogenic mutation across diverse solid tumor types, associated with a high co-occurrence of other activating mutations and a high TMB. The lack of response to other targeted therapies suggests ERK2 E322K is a potential driver mutation. These findings may inform treatment and further development of ERK inhibitors.

First-in-human study of PC14586, a small molecule structural corrector of Y220C mutant p53, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a TP53 Y220C mutation

3003

Background: The p53 tumor suppressor protein is a transcription factor that acts to maintain genome stability in response to cellular stress. Spontaneous mutation of the TP53 gene leading to inactivation of the p53 protein is the most common mutational event across all human cancers. PC14586 is a novel, small molecule structural corrector that binds selectively to p53 Y220C mutant protein and restores the p53 wildtype conformation and transcriptional activity, resulting in potent preclinical antitumor activity. This Phase 1 multicenter dose escalation study assesses PC14586 safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors that harbor the TP53 Y220C mutation. Methods: Eligible adult pts with locally advanced or metastastic TP53 Y220C mutant solid tumors received increasing doses of oral PC14586 using the modified Toxicity Probability Interval design to estimate toxicity and to determine maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose. Plasma PK was characterized using standard methods. Preliminary efficacy was assessed by RECIST v1.1. Reporting of interim results was approved by the study’s Safety Review Committee. Results: As of 08 Feb 2022, 29 pts (62% female, median age 62 years) with a variety of TP53 Y220C mutant solid tumor types (median number of prior lines of therapy 3; range 1 to 8) were treated in 7 dose cohorts of PC14586: 150 mg QD (3 pts), 300 mg QD (3 pts), 600 mg QD (4 pts), 1150 mg QD (5 pts), 2000 mg QD (7 pts), 2500 mg QD (4 pts) and 1500 mg BID (3 pts). PC14586 was generally well-tolerated; treatment-related AEs were observed in 79% of pts that were all Grade 1/2 in severity except 2 Grade 3 AEs (alanine aminotransferase increased and neutrophil count decreased). The most common AEs (≥15% of pts) were nausea (34%), vomiting (24%), fatigue (21%), and aspartate aminotransferase increased (17%). There were no dose limiting toxicities and enrollment continues. PK analysis showed dose proportional increases in Cmax and AUC. Amongst 21 efficacy evaluable pts, PRs were observed in 5 pts: 1 small cell lung and 1 breast with confirmed PR (cPR), both ongoing; 1 colorectal with unconfirmed PR (uPR), and 2 prostate with uPR and ongoing. In the 3 highest dose cohorts (total daily dose 2000 to 3000 mg), there were 3 PRs (2 uPR, 1cPR) and 7 SD out of 10 efficacy evaluable pts (all ongoing). Observations of decreasing p53 Y220C circulating tumor DNA and decreasing numbers of circulating tumor cells in pts further support on-target anti-tumor activity of PC14586. Conclusions: Enrollment to a Phase 1 study is feasible in a TP53 mutation selective population. PC14586 is safe and tolerated up to 3000 mg daily. Preliminary efficacy was achieved in heavily pretreated pts. Additional safety, PK, PD and efficacy data will be reported at the annual meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04585750.

Mechanisms of acquired resistance to TRK inhibitors

3104

Background: First-generation TRK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are approved in a tumor-agnostic fashion in more than 40 countries for patients with NTRK fusion-positive adult and pediatric cancers. While resistance to these agents has previously been described, the exact frequency with which major mechanisms of resistance emerges is not clearly understood. Methods: Patients with an NTRK-fusion-positive tumor who received a first-generation TRK TKI were eligible. We retrospectively identified those patients that had post-progression tumor tissue analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The pattern of serial resistance to a second-generation TKI was analyzed when available. Results: Eighteen patients were identified. The median age was 46 years (range 2-67). Nine unique fusions were detected in ten different tumor types. NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 fusions were found in eight (44%), one (6%), and nine (50%) patients, respectively. Thirteen patients (72%) were treated with larotrectinib and five patients (28%) received entrectinib. NGS (MSK-IMPACT n = 17, Foundation One n = 1) carried out on post-progression tissue revealed the following profile of acquired resistance: on-target resistance (83%, n = 15/18), off-target resistance (11%, n = 2/18), and no identifiable mechanism (6%, n = 1/18). Among patients with on-target resistance, the most common mutation involved the solvent front (87%, n = 13/15: n = 7 NTRK3 G623R, n = 4 NTRK1 G595R, n = 1 NTRK2 G639L, n = 1 NTRK3 G623E) followed by the gatekeeper region (13%, n = 2/15: n = 1 NTRK1 F589L, n = 1 NTRK3 F617I). Two patients developed off-target alterations. One acquired BRAF V600E mutation and the other MET amplification. Interestingly, solvent front mutation loss was observed in two patients who transitioned to and progressed on a second-generation TRK TKI. One patient with a baseline NTRK1 G595R mutation developed polyclonal resistance with acquisition of KRAS G12A and NTRK1 G667A alterations as well as NTRK1 G595R loss. The other patient with NTRK3 G623R developed an NTRK3 F617I gatekeeper mutation with NTRK3 G623R loss. Conclusions: In NTRK fusion-positive cancers, on-target resistance preferentially involving the solvent front is more frequent than off-target resistance to first-generation TKI therapy. Furthermore, the sequential use of second-generation therapy appears to alter the evolutionary kinetics of mutation retention and acquisition.

The bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitor RMC-5552 in tumors with activation of mTOR signaling: Preclinical activity in combination with RAS(ON) inhibitors in RAS-addicted tumors, and initial clinical findings from a single agent phase 1/1b study

3098

Background: RMC-5552 is a potent bi-steric mTORC1-selective inhibitor that activates the downstream tumor suppressor 4EBP1, thereby inhibiting initiation of protein translation. This novel therapeutic moiety addresses a key limitation of rapalogs, which do not effectively inhibit phosphorylation of 4EBP1. RMC-5552 has previously demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity in preclinical models of human cancers with mTOR pathway activation. Additionally, mTOR signaling plays a key role in therapeutic response and resistance in RAS-addicted cancers, which represent a significant unmet medical need. Methods: We examined the combination of bi-steric mTORC1 inhibitors (RMC-5552 and the research tool compound RMC-6272) with direct inhibitors of active RAS (RAS(ON) inhibitors) in mutant KRAS-driven models. To enable the clinical testing of RMC-5552 as a companion inhibitor for RAS(ON) inhibitors, a Phase 1/1b dose-escalation trial of RMC-5552 monotherapy is currently testing a once-a-week IV schedule. Results: RMC-5552 and RMC-6272 demonstrated marked combinatorial anti-tumor activity with RAS(ON) inhibitors across a series of preclinical models of KRAS mutated non-small cell lung cancer. The combination enhanced tumor apoptosis and resulted in durable tumor regressions as compared to tumor growth inhibition resulting from single agents alone. As of 13 January 2022, a total of 14 patients with solid tumors have been evaluated in an ongoing Phase 1/1b trial over 5 dose levels ranging from 1.6 to 12 mg IV weekly. Median age was 62 years and the majority received ≥3 prior therapies. The most common (> 25%) drug-related adverse events were mucositis/stomatitis (43%) and decreased appetite (29%). The most common grade 3 drug-related adverse events were mucositis/stomatitis observed in 3 patients in dose levels ≥ 10 mg (21%) and were dose-limiting. The dose of 6 mg IV weekly was well tolerated. Plasma exposures of RMC-5552 were dose-proportionate at lower dose levels up to 6 mg but increased above dose proportionality with higher dose levels. Plasma exposures at 6 mg and above were consistent with those resulting in inhibition of tumor p4EBP1 in preclinical models. Of 5 patients evaluable for efficacy at doses of 6 mg and higher, one confirmed PR was observed in a patient with head and neck cancer with a pathogenic mutation in PTEN (ORR 20%) and 3 patients had a best response of SD. Dose-optimization is ongoing. Conclusions: RMC-5552 is clinically active in tumors with mTORC1 signaling activation at a tolerable dose and schedule and has the potential to be a companion inhibitor of choice for RAS(ON) inhibitors in RAS-addicted tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT04774952.

CD74-NRG1 Fusions Are Oncogenic In Vivo and Induce Therapeutically Tractable ERBB2:ERBB3 Heterodimerization

NRG1 fusions are recurrent somatic genome alterations occurring across several tumor types, including invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinomas and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and are potentially actionable genetic alterations in these cancers. We initially discovered CD74-NRG1 as the first NRG1 fusion in lung adenocarcinomas, and many additional fusion partners have since been identified. Here, we present the first CD74-NRG1 transgenic mouse model and provide evidence that ubiquitous expression of the CD74-NRG1 fusion protein in vivo leads to tumor development at high frequency. Furthermore, we show that ERBB2:ERBB3 heterodimerization is a mechanistic event in transformation by CD74-NRG1 binding physically to ERBB3 and that CD74-NRG1-expressing cells proliferate independent of supplemented NRG1 ligand. Thus, NRG1 gene fusions are recurrent driver oncogenes that cause oncogene dependency. Consistent with these findings, patients with NRG1 fusion-positive cancers respond to therapy targeting the ERBB2:ERBB3 receptors.

Zenocutuzumab, a HER2xHER3 Bispecific Antibody, Is Effective Therapy for Tumors Driven by NRG1 Gene Rearrangements

NRG1 rearrangements are recurrent oncogenic drivers in solid tumors. NRG1 binds to HER3, leading to heterodimerization with other HER/ERBB kinases, increased downstream signaling, and tumorigenesis. Targeting ERBBs, therefore, represents a therapeutic strategy for these cancers. We investigated zenocutuzumab (Zeno; MCLA-128), an antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity-enhanced anti-HER2xHER3 bispecific antibody, in NRG1 fusion-positive isogenic and patient-derived cell lines and xenograft models. Zeno inhibited HER3 and AKT phosphorylation, induced expression of apoptosis markers, and inhibited growth. Three patients with chemotherapy-resistant NRG1 fusion-positive metastatic cancer were treated with Zeno. Two patients with ATP1B1-NRG1-positive pancreatic cancer achieved rapid symptomatic, biomarker, and radiographic responses and remained on treatment for over 12 months. A patient with CD74-NRG1-positive non-small cell lung cancer who had progressed on six prior lines of systemic therapy, including afatinib, responded rapidly to treatment with a partial response. Targeting HER2 and HER3 simultaneously with Zeno is a novel therapeutic paradigm for patients with NRG1 fusion-positive cancers.

SIGNIFICANCE

NRG1 rearrangements encode chimeric ligands that activate the ERBB receptor tyrosine kinase family. Here we show that targeting HER2 and HER3 simultaneously with the bispecific antibody Zeno leads to durable clinical responses in patients with NRG1 fusion-positive cancers and is thus an effective therapeutic strategy. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1171.

AKT mutant allele-specific activation dictates pharmacologic sensitivities

AKT- a key molecular regulator of PI-3K signaling pathway, is somatically mutated in diverse solid cancer types, and aberrant AKT activation promotes altered cancer cell growth, survival, and metabolism1-8. The most common of AKT mutations (AKT1 E17K) sensitizes affected solid tumors to AKT inhibitor therapy7,8. However, the pathway dependence and inhibitor sensitivity of the long tail of potentially activating mutations in AKT is poorly understood, limiting our ability to act clinically in prospectively characterized cancer patients. Here we show, through population-scale driver mutation discovery combined with functional, biological, and therapeutic studies that some but not all missense mutations activate downstream AKT effector pathways in a growth factor-independent manner and sensitize tumor cells to diverse AKT inhibitors. A distinct class of small in-frame duplications paralogous across AKT isoforms induce structural changes different than those of activating missense mutations, leading to a greater degree of membrane affinity, AKT activation, and cell proliferation as well as pathway dependence and hyper-sensitivity to ATP-competitive, but not allosteric AKT inhibitors. Assessing these mutations clinically, we conducted a phase II clinical trial testing the AKT inhibitor capivasertib (AZD5363) in patients with solid tumors harboring AKT alterations (NCT03310541). Twelve patients were enrolled, out of which six harbored AKT1-3 non-E17K mutations. The median progression free survival (PFS) of capivasertib therapy was 84 days (95% CI 50-not reached) with an objective response rate of 25% (n = 3 of 12) and clinical benefit rate of 42% (n = 5 of 12). Collectively, our data indicate that the degree and mechanism of activation of oncogenic AKT mutants vary, thereby dictating allele-specific pharmacological sensitivities to AKT inhibition.

Clinical and Morphologic Characteristics of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Inhibitor-Associated Retinopathy

PURPOSE

To investigate clinical and morphologic characteristics of serous retinal disturbances in patients taking extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitors.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective study of prospectively collected data.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 61 patients receiving ERK inhibitors for treatment of metastatic cancer, this study included 40 eyes of 20 patients with evidence of retinopathy confirmed by OCT.

METHODS

Clinical examination, fundus photography, and OCT were used to evaluate ERK inhibitor retinopathy. The morphologic features, distribution, and location of fluid foci were evaluated serially. Visual acuity (VA) and choroidal thickness measurements were compared at baseline, fluid accumulation, and resolution.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Characteristics of treatment-emergent choroid and retinal OCT abnormalities as compared with baseline OCT findings and the impact of toxicity on VA.

RESULTS

Of 20 patients with retinopathy, most showed fluid foci that were bilateral (100%), multifocal in each eye (75%), and with at least 1 focus involving the fovea (95%). All subretinal fluid foci occurred between the interdigitation zone and an intact retinal pigment epithelium. No statistical difference was found in choroidal thickness at fluid accumulation and resolution compared with baseline. Forty-five percent of eyes showed evidence of concomitant intraretinal edema localized to the outer nuclear layer. At the time of fluid accumulation, 57.5% eyes showed a decline in VA (mainly by 1-2 lines from baseline). For all eyes with follow-up, the subretinal fluid and intraretinal edema were reversible and resolved without medical intervention, and best-corrected VA at fluid resolution was not statistically different from baseline. Concomitant intraretinal fluid was not associated with worsening of VA. No patient discontinued or decreased drug dose because of retinopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that ERK inhibitors may cause subretinal fluid foci with unique clinical and morphologic characteristics. The observed foci were similar to mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor-associated retinopathy and distinct from central serous chorioretinopathy. However, unlike with MEK inhibitors, an increased occurrence of concomitant intraretinal fluid without significant additive visual impact seems to occur with ERK inhibitors. In this series, ERK inhibitors did not cause irreversible loss of vision or serious eye damage; retinopathy was self-limited and did not require medical intervention.

Abstract P02-02: First results of RLY-4008, a potent and highly selective FGFR2 inhibitor in a first-in-human study in patients with FGFR2-altered cholangiocarcinoma and multiple solid tumors

INTRODUCTION: Oncogenic FGFR2 alterations (fusions/rearrangements, amplifications, mutations) are key drivers in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and multiple solid tumors. Current pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi) therapy is limited by off-isoform toxicity and acquired FGFR2 kinase domain resistance mutations. RLY-4008 is a highly selective and potent oral inhibitor designed to target both FGFR2 driver and resistance mutations. We initiated a first-in-human study in advanced solid tumors patients (pts) to define the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of RLY-4008 (NCT04526106). METHODS: Adult pts received RLY-4008 QD or BID on a 4-week cycle following a BOIN escalation design. Adverse events (AEs), PK, ctDNA and anti-tumor activity (RECIST 1.1) were assessed. RESULTS: As of 16AUG21, 45 pts (35 CCA; 10 other) have been treated with RLY-4008 at total daily doses of 30-200 mg (18 pts BID; 27 pts QD). 44 pts had oncogenic FGFR2 alterations (26 fusions/13 mutations/5 amplifications). The median number of prior anti-neoplastic therapies was 3 (range 1-15). 94% (33/35) of CCA pts had prior chemotherapy and 69% (24/35) had prior FGFRi. 56% (9/16) CCA pts with prior FGFRi and evaluable ctDNA had ≥1 FGFR2 resistance mutation at baseline, most commonly at positions 549 (8/9), 617 (3/9), or 564 (2/9). RLY-4008 had rapid absorption (Tmax 1-7h), half-life to support QD dosing (18-34 h), dose-dependent exposure (AUC; Cmax) and predicted FGFR2 occupancy &gt;85% across dose levels. The MTD has not been defined, and QD dose exploration continues to select the optimal biologically efficacious dose. AEs occurring in &gt;20% of pts include stomatitis (49%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE, 38%), dry mouth (29%), and nail toxicities (22%), majority of which were ≤Gr 2. 6 pts had Gr 1-2 retinopathy, which resolved in all cases. 5 AEs were considered dose limiting toxicities: 4 in BID (rash/PPE/mucositis/hyperbilirubinemia) and 1 in QD (retinopathy). No Gr 4/5 drug-related AEs were seen. 25 pts remain on treatment (range 1-37 weeks). RLY-4008 showed broad anti-tumor activity across dose levels and FGFR2 alterations with radiographic tumor reductions of ≥10% in 59% pts (19/32; -11% to -83%). Activity was seen in FGFRi-naïve, FGFR2-fusion+ CCA with PRs in 50% of pts (3/6, 2 confirmed and 1 pending confirmation; -56% to -83%). Activity was also seen in FGFRi pre-treated FGFR2-fusion+ CCA pts (N=16) with 16 SD, including 9 pts with tumor reduction ≥10% (from -12% to -35%). Of the FGFRi pre-treated FGFR2-fusion+ CCA patients with detectable FGFR2 resistance mutations in ctDNA at baseline, 78% (7/9) were undetectable at C2D1. CONCLUSION: RLY-4008 demonstrates promising safety, tolerability, and clinical activity in FGFR2-altered solid tumor pts, including those who progressed on prior FGFRi therapy. Consistent with the FGFR2-selective mechanism, minimal off-isoform toxicity (FGFR1-hyperphosphatemia; FGFR4-diarrhea) was seen. These encouraging data validate selective targeting of FGFR2 and suggest that RLY-4008 has potential to overcome resistance to FGFRi.

Citation Format: Lipika Goyal, Mitesh Borad, Vivek Subbiah, Amit Mahipal, Suneel Kamath, Kabir Mody, Robin Katie Kelley, Richard Kim, Vaibhav Sahai, Anthony El-Khoueiry, Efrat Dotan, Oleg Schmidt-Kittler, Jinshan Shen, Kai Yu Jen, Alicia Deary, Wei Guo, Mahesh Padval, Cori Ann J. Sherwin, Charles Ferte, Beni Wolf, Alison M. Schram. First results of RLY-4008, a potent and highly selective FGFR2 inhibitor in a first-in-human study in patients with FGFR2-altered cholangiocarcinoma and multiple solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P02-02.

Clinical and Morphologic Characteristics of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor-Associated Retinopathy

Importance

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1 to 4 inhibitors are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and suppress the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, with a potential for treatment-related retinopathy. To date, implications of FGFR inhibitor-associated ocular toxic effects are poorly described. Therefore, more detailed clinical descriptions of this ocular toxic effect could help explain visual symptoms while receiving drug therapy.

Objective

To describe the clinical and morphologic characteristics of serous retinal disturbances associated with FGFR inhibitors.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this retrospective case series, 146 patients receiving FGFR inhibitors as cancer treatment at a single tertiary referral center were included. This study included 40 eyes of 20 patients with retinopathy by optical coherence tomography (OCT). OCTs were obtained on the remaining patients and the results were judged normal. Patients were recruited from March 2012 to January 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Characteristics of treatment-emergent choroidal and retinal OCT abnormalities as compared with baseline OCT, associated with visual acuity at presentation and at fluid resolution.

Results

A total of 20 of 146 patients (13.7%) exhibited FGFR inhibitor-associated retinopathy. Of these 20 patients, 11 (55%) were female, and the median (range) age was 62.6 (42.7-86.0) years. The median (range; mean) time from medication start to initial subretinal fluid detection was 21 (5-125; 32) days. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) baseline logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0 (0-0.1). At fluid accumulation, 11 eyes had decreased vision: the median (IQR) subgroup baseline BCVA was 0 (0-0.1); and the median (IQR) BCVA change from baseline to accumulation was -0.1 (-0.2 to -0.1). For 26 eyes (65%) with follow-up, the subretinal fluid resolved without medical intervention or drug interruption in all but 1 patient. At fluid resolution, the median (IQR) BCVA was 0.1 (0-0.1), and the change in median (IQR) BCVA from baseline to fluid resolution was 0 (-0.03 to 0). No patient discontinued drug therapy on account of their retinopathy.

Conclusions and Relevance

FGFR inhibitors result in subretinal fluid foci similar to other drugs that inhibit the MAPK pathway. In this series, FGFR inhibitors did not cause irreversible loss of vision; the retinopathy was self-limited and did not require medical intervention. These results may explain visual symptoms while taking the drug, although the precise frequency or magnitude of this adverse effect cannot be determined with certainty from this retrospective investigation.

Spectrum of BRAF Mutations and Gene Rearrangements in Ovarian Serous Carcinoma

Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is a rare type of ovarian cancer, which commonly arises from serous borderline tumor (SBT) and is characterized by frequent activating mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, including BRAF. The BRAF ^V600E mutation is associated with improved prognosis in SBT and LGSC, and responses to BRAF inhibitor therapy have been reported. We sought to characterize the clinicopathologic and molecular features of BRAF-driven tubo-ovarian and primary peritoneal serous tumors.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of our institutional cohort of SBTs (n = 22), LGSCs (n = 119) and high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs, n = 1,290) subjected to targeted massively parallel sequencing was performed to identify cases with BRAF genetic alterations. Putative BRAF rearrangements were confirmed using targeted RNA sequencing and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). BRAF^V600E oncoprotein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on selected cases.

RESULTS

BRAF somatic genetic alterations were identified in 29 of 1,431 (2%) serous tumors and included mutations (n = 24), gene rearrangements (n = 3), and amplification (n = 2). BRAF mutations were more frequent in SBTs (7 of 22; 32%) compared with LGSCs (11 of 119; 9%, P = .009) and HGSCs (6 of 1,290; 0.5%; P < .0001, SBT/LGSC v HGSC). The BRAF ^V600E hotspot mutation was most common (n = 16); however, other BRAF driver mutations were also detected (n = 8). BRAF mutations were often clonal or truncal in SBTs and LGSCs, but subclonal in most HGSCs. Pathogenic BRAF gene fusions were identified in LGSCs (n = 2) and HGSC (n = 1) and involved distinct fusion partners (AGK, MKRN1, and AGAP3). Three patients with BRAF-mutant LGSC were treated with targeted mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors, one of whom was maintained on therapy for over 3 years with clinical benefit.

CONCLUSION

Recognition of BRAF alterations beyond V600E mutation in LGSC may have clinical implications for appropriate targeted therapy selection.

NTRK1 Fusions identified by non-invasive plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) across 9 cancer types

BACKGROUND

Activating fusions of the NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 genes are drivers of carcinogenesis and proliferation across a broad range of tumour types in both adult and paediatric patients. Recently, the FDA granted tumour-agnostic approvals of TRK inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, based on significant and durable responses in multiple primary tumour types. Unfortunately, testing rates in clinical practice remain quite low. Adding plasma next-generation sequencing of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to tissue-based testing increases the detection rate of oncogenic drivers and demonstrates high concordance with tissue genotyping. However, the clinical potential of ctDNA analysis to identify NTRK fusion-positive tumours has been largely unexplored.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a ctDNA database in advanced stage solid tumours for NTRK1 fusions.

RESULTS

NTRK1 fusion events, with nine unique fusion partners, were identified in 37 patients. Of the cases for which clinical data were available, 44% had tissue testing for NTRK1 fusions; the NTRK1 fusion detected by ctDNA was confirmed in tissue in 88% of cases. Here, we report for the first time that minimally-invasive plasma NGS can detect NTRK fusions with a high positive predictive value.

CONCLUSION

Plasma ctDNA represents a rapid, non-invasive screening method for this rare genomic target that may improve identification of patients who can benefit from TRK-targeted therapy and potentially identify subsequent on- and off-target resistance mechanisms.

Clinicopathologic Features and Response to Therapy of NRG1 Fusion-Driven Lung Cancers: The eNRGy1 Global Multicenter Registry

PURPOSE

Although NRG1 fusions are oncogenic drivers across multiple tumor types including lung cancers, these are difficult to study because of their rarity. The global eNRGy1 registry was thus established to characterize NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancers in the largest and most diverse series to date.

METHODS

From June 2018 to February 2020, a consortium of 22 centers from nine countries in Europe, Asia, and the United States contributed data from patients with pathologically confirmed NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancers. Profiling included DNA-based and/or RNA-based next-generation sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Anonymized clinical, pathologic, molecular, and response (RECIST v1.1) data were centrally curated and analyzed.

RESULTS

Although the typified never smoking (57%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (57%), and nonmetastatic (71%) phenotype predominated in 110 patients with NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancer, further diversity, including in smoking history (43%) and histology (43% nonmucinous and 6% nonadenocarcinoma), was elucidated. RNA-based testing identified most fusions (74%). Molecularly, six (of 18) novel 5' partners, 20 unique epidermal growth factor domain-inclusive chimeric events, and heterogeneous 5'/3' breakpoints were found. Platinum-doublet and taxane-based (post-platinum-doublet) chemotherapy achieved low objective response rates (ORRs 13% and 14%, respectively) and modest progression-free survival medians (PFS 5.8 and 4.0 months, respectively). Consistent with a low programmed death ligand-1 expressing (28%) and low tumor mutational burden (median: 0.9 mutations/megabase) immunophenotype, the activity of chemoimmunotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy was poor (ORR 0%/PFS 3.3 months and ORR 20%/PFS 3.6 months, respectively). Afatinib achieved an ORR of 25%, not contingent on fusion type, and a 2.8-month median PFS.

CONCLUSION

NRG1 fusion-positive lung cancers were molecularly, pathologically, and clinically more heterogeneous than previously recognized. The activity of cytotoxic, immune, and targeted therapies was disappointing. Further research examining NRG1-rearranged tumor biology is needed to develop new therapeutic strategies.

Comprehensive Molecular and Clinicopathologic Analysis of 200 Pulmonary Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinomas Identifies Distinct Characteristics of Molecular Subtypes

PURPOSE

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is a unique subtype of lung adenocarcinoma, characterized genomically by frequent KRAS mutations or specific gene fusions, most commonly involving NRG1. Comprehensive analysis of a large series of IMAs using broad DNA- and RNA-sequencing methods is still lacking, and it remains unclear whether molecular subtypes of IMA differ clinicopathologically.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A total of 200 IMAs were analyzed by 410-gene DNA next-generation sequencing (MSK-IMPACT; n = 136) or hotspot 8-oncogene genotyping (n = 64). Driver-negative cases were further analyzed by 62-gene RNA sequencing (MSK-Fusion) and those lacking fusions were further tested by whole-exome sequencing and whole-transcriptome sequencing (WTS).

RESULTS

Combined MSK-IMPACT and MSK-Fusion testing identified mutually exclusive driver alterations in 96% of IMAs, including KRAS mutations (76%), NRG1 fusions (7%), ERBB2 alterations (6%), and other less common events. In addition, WTS identified a novel NRG2 fusion (F11R-NRG2). Overall, targetable gene fusions were identified in 51% of KRAS wild-type IMAs, leading to durable responses to targeted therapy in some patients. Compared with KRAS-mutant IMAs, NRG1-rearranged tumors exhibited several more aggressive characteristics, including worse recurrence-free survival (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest molecular study of IMAs to date, where we demonstrate the presence of a major oncogenic driver in nearly all cases. This study is the first to document more aggressive characteristics of NRG1-rearranged IMAs, ERBB2 as the third most common alteration, and a novel NRG2 fusion in these tumors. Comprehensive molecular testing of KRAS wild-type IMAs that includes fusion testing is essential, given the high prevalence of alterations with established and investigational targeted therapies in this subset.

Abstract 956: The HER2×HER3 bi-specific antibody Zenocutuzumab is effective at blocking growth of tumors driven by NRG1 gene fusions

Fusions involving the neuregulin 1 gene (NRG1) occur at low frequency in pancreatic, lung, and other cancers. NRG1 fusion oncoproteins bind to HER3, leading to heterodimerization with HER2 and potent activation of downstream signaling mainly via the PI3K-AKT pathway. Zenocutuzumab (Zeno, MCLA-128), an ADCC-enhanced anti-HER2×HER3 bi-specific antibody, uniquely ‘docks' on HER2, to position the antibody and subsequently ‘block' NRG1 from interacting with HER3, effectively preventing HER2:HER3 heterodimerization and downstream signaling. Our goal in this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Zeno in preclinical models of NRG1 fusion-positive cancers.

We tested Zeno in a panel of isogenic and patient-derived cell line and xenograft (PDX) models of lung, breast and pancreatic cancers. Cell lines either expressed an NRG1 fusion endogenously (MDA-MB-175-VII, DOC4-NRG1) or by lentiviral transfer of cDNAs (ATP1B1-NRG1 and SLC3A2-NRG1 in H6c7 pancreatic ductal cell line; CD74-NRG1 and VAMP2-NRG1 in immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells; and DOC4-NRG1 in MCF7 breast cancer cells). PDX models were generated from NSCLC samples harboring CD74-NRG1 (ST3204) or SLC3A2-NRG1 (LUAD-0061AS3) fusions and from a high grade serous ovarian cancer harboring a CLU-NRG1 fusion (OV-10-0050). Zeno treatment of NRG1 fusion-expressing breast, pancreatic, and lung cancer cell lines resulted in dose-dependent reduction of growth and abrogated phosphorylation of HER3, HER4, AKT, p70S6 kinase and STAT3 in all cell lines tested. Phosphorylation of HER2, EGFR and MEK/ERK was inhibited, albeit with some variation, in a cell line-specific manner. Growth of isogenic control cell lines without NRG1 fusion was not significantly altered. In breast and lung cancer cell lines, Zeno treatment down-regulated cyclin D1 expression and induced expression of the negative cell cycle regulators P21 or P27. Evidence of apoptosis activation (cleaved PARP, expression of BIM and PUMA) was also observed in cells exposed to Zeno. Treatment of mice bearing LUAD-0061AS3, ST3204 and OV-10-0050 PDX tumors (2.5, 8, 25 mg/kg, QW) caused a dose-dependent inhibition of tumor growth, with tumor shrinkage observed at higher doses. Finally, we assessed the ability of Zeno to induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity using a chromium release assay and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Zeno induced significant cytotoxicity in MDA-MB-175-VII cells while a non-ADCC enhanced, non-specific IgG had no effect.

Here we show that Zeno effectively blocks the growth of NRG1 fusion-positive cell line and xenograft models of tumors arising from lung, pancreas and other organs, and these results support the continued development of Zeno to treat patients with this molecularly defined subset of cancers.

Citation Format: Igor Odintsov, Inna Khodos, Madelyn Espinosa-Cotton, Allan J. Lui, Marissa Mattar, Alison M. Schram, Ron C. Schackmann, Jeroen Lammerts van Bueren, Cecile A. Geuijen, Elisa de Stanchina, Marc Ladanyi, Romel Somwar. The HER2×HER3 bi-specific antibody Zenocutuzumab is effective at blocking growth of tumors driven by NRG1 gene fusions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 956.

First-in-human study of highly selective FGFR2 inhibitor, RLY-4008, in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and other advanced solid tumors

TPS4165

Background: Oncogenic activation of FGFR2 via genomic rearrangement, gene amplification, or point mutation in advanced solid tumors provides the opportunity for rapid clinical development of highly selective FGFR2 inhibitors using a precision oncology approach to deliver clinical benefit to genomically-defined patient (pt) populations. Unfortunately, this opportunity remains largely unrealized as current, non-selective small molecule inhibitors (pan-FGFRi) suffer from off-isoform toxicity (FGFR1-hyperphosphatemia; FGFR4-diarrhea) and on-target acquired resistance leading to only modest efficacy primarily limited to FGFR2-fusion+ intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). RLY-4008 is a novel, oral FGFR2 inhibitor designed to overcome the limitations of pan-FGFRi by potently and selectively targeting primary oncogenic FGFR2 alterations and acquired resistance mutations. We initiated a first-in-human (FIH) precision oncology study of RLY-4008 in advanced solid tumor pts with FGFR2 alterations with primary objectives to define the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (MTD/RP2D) and adverse event (AE) profile of RLY-4008 and key secondary objectives to assess FGFR2 genotype in blood and tumor tissue, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity. Methods: This is a global, multi-center, FIH dose escalation/expansion study of RLY-4008 (NCT04526106) in adult pts who have unresectable or metastatic solid tumors with FGFR2 alteration per local assessment, ECOG performance status 0-2, measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1, and who are refractory, intolerant, or declined standard therapy including pan-FGFRi. FGFR2 alteration will be confirmed retrospectively by central laboratory assessment. For the dose escalation (Ñ50), RLY-4008 is administered QD/BID on a continuous schedule with 4-week cycles according to a Bayesian Optimal Interval design that allows accelerated dose titration, additional accrual to dose levels declared tolerable, and exploration of alternative schedules if warranted. The MTD is determined via logistic regression of the dose limiting toxicity rate across all dose levels and an RP2D less than the MTD may be considered based on observed AEs, PK, and anti-tumor activity. Following dose escalation, the dose expansion (Ñ75) will treat pts with RLY-4008 at the MTD/RP2D and includes 5 groups with any prior therapy (except group 2): 1. FGFR2 fusion+ ICC pts; 2. FGFR2 fusion+ ICC pts with no prior FGFRi; 3. FGFR2 fusion+ pts with other solid tumors; 4. FGFR2-mutation+ solid tumor pts and 5. FGFR2-amplified solid tumor pts. The primary endpoints are MTD/RP2D and AE profile; key secondary endpoints are FGFR2 genotype in blood and tumor tissue, PK parameters; overall response rate, and duration of response per RECIST 1.1. US enrollment began SEP2020 and Europe/Asia start-up is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT04526106.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of bdtx-189, an inhibitor of allosteric ErbB mutations, in patients with advanced solid malignancies in MasterKey-01 study

3097

Background: Allosteric oncogenic mutations occur outside the canonical ATP-binding site of EGFR and HER2, and there are no approved therapies that target such mutations. BDTX-189 is a potent, selective, irreversible inhibitor of 48 allosteric EGFR and HER2 mutant variants under clinical evaluation in the ongoing MasterKey-01 trial (NCT04209465). BDTX-189 was designed to rapidly and irreversibly occupy the active site of targeted ErbB mutants, leading to sustained pharmacodynamic (PD) effects, and with selectivity over EGFR-WT in order to minimize EGFR-WT mediated toxicities. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile was designed for rapid absorption and fast elimination to maintain target occupancy while minimizing prolonged drug exposure that could contribute to off-target associated toxicities. Methods: In MasterKey-01, BDTX-189 was administered orally once daily in continuous 21-day cycles, taken fasted. Dose escalation included cohorts of 1-2 patients receiving doses between 25 and 200 mg QD followed by 5-7 patients receiving 400 mg, 800 mg, or 1,200 mg QD fasted. The possible effects of a high fat meal on the PK of BDTX-189 were assessed in a subset of patients receiving single doses of 400 mg BDTX-189 fasted and immediately after a high-fat breakfast in a randomized crossover fashion with 3 days between doses. In addition, a dose escalation cohort investigating administration of BDTX-189 non-fasted was enrolled at 800 mg QD. Serial blood samples for analysis of plasma BDTX-189 concentrations were collected after each dose on C1D1 and C1D15. BDTX-189 levels were determined using LC-MS, and data analyzed using non-compartmental methods. Results: After single and multiple doses, BDTX-189 was rapidly absorbed (median tmax 1-2 h), with an elimination t1/2 of 2-6 h. Dose-dependent increases in exposure from 200 to 800 mg QD fasted were observed, with no apparent accumulation or decline in exposures observed at steady-state. Administration of BDTX-189 with a high-fat meal increased AUC approximately 1.7-fold with minimal effect on Cmax, relative to administration in the fasted state. At 800 mg QD, mean AUC was similar in the non-fasting state relative to fasting and was within the target efficacious range defined by mouse models harboring allo-ErbB mutated tumors. Median tmax and t1/2 values were similar after administration in the non-fasted and fasted states. Conclusions: BDTX-189 demonstrated rapid absorption and a short PK half-life consistent with the desired PK/PD profile, with exposures in the efficacious target range based on preclinical data. The pilot high fat food-effect data and non-fasting QD dosing regimen show similar or improved systemic exposure relative to dosing in the fasted state. The MasterKey-01 trial is ongoing, including refinement of the dosing regimen and identification of the recommended phase 2 dose. Clinical trial information: NCT04209465.

BRCA reversion mutations in a pan-cancer cohort to reveal BRCA-dependence in select noncanonical BRCA-mutant histologies

3012

Background: Loss of BRCA1/2 function leads to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and can enhance platinum and PARP inhibitor sensitivity in breast, pancreas, prostate, and ovarian cancers. In BRCA-associated cancers, resistance can result from the development of BRCA1/2 reversion mutations, which restore BRCA1/2 function. By contrast, a BRCA mutation may be an incidental finding in other tumor histologies. Methods: To determine the distribution of reversion mutations in a pan-cancer cohort, the MSK-IMPACT clinical sequencing cohort was mined to identify patients who had both a germline BRCA1/2 mutation and a frameshift somatic reversion mutation that restored BRCA1/2 function. Whole exome resequencing was used to detect HRD signatures. Chart review enabled collection of data on treatment history in patients consented to germline testing. Results: Of the 33,277 patients with matched tumor and normal sequencing profiled in this study, 861 patients were found to have germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 alterations, including 347 (40%) in BRCA1 and 514 (60%) in BRCA2. Somatic BRCA1/2 driver alterations were also found in tumor tissue from an additional 447 patients, with 156 (35%) having BRCA1 mutations, and the remainder having alterations in BRCA2 (65%) . Among the 1,308 germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutant tumors, we identified reversion mutations in 12 patients, all of whom were germline carriers of BRCA1/2, comprising 3 BRCA1 and 9 BRCA2 tumors. 7 patients consented to germline testing enabling review of clinical characteristics and treatment history, 5 of whom received PARP inhibitor or platinum-therapy prior to reversion detection. Ten of 12 tumors with reversion mutations were in canonical BRCA-associated cancers. Interestingly, reversion mutations were also found in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (n=1) and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (n=1). In both these non-canonical histologies, the reversion was detected following progression on platinum-based therapy. Whole exome resequencing of the lung tumor revealed the classic somatic molecular phenotypes of HRD that are characteristic of BRCA-dependent tumors, including in terms of large-scale transitions, HRD-loss of heterozygosity, signature 3, and the number of telomeric allelic imbalance score. Conclusions: Matched tumor and normal sequencing from a large cohort of patients with diverse cancer histologies reveals that reversion mutations are found across BRCA-associated cancer types. In rare cases, reversion mutations in BRCA1/2 following platinum-based therapy may be indicative of prior BRCA-dependence in select non-canonical tumor histologies.

Efficacy and safety of zenocutuzumab in advanced pancreas cancer and other solid tumors harboring NRG1 fusions

3003

Background: NRG1 fusion proteins are oncogenic drivers in pancreas cancer and other solid tumors. They bind HER3, leading to HER2/HER3 heterodimerization and oncogenic transformation. The activity of zenocutuzumab (MCLA-128; zeno), a bispecific antibody targeting NRG1 fusion signaling in NRG1 fusion positive ( NRG1+) cancers, is being evaluated in the ongoing global multicenter phase 2 part of the eNRGy study and a global early access program (EAP). Methods: Enrolled patients (pts) have advanced NRG1+ pancreas cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and other solid tumors previously treated with standard therapy, are ≥ 18 years-old, have ECOG ≤1, adequate organ function, and measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Zeno dosing: 750 mg IV every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint: investigator (INV)-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints: ORR per central independent radiologist review, duration of response (DOR), and safety. Tumor imaging is conducted every 8 weeks. Results: 51 pts with NRG1+ cancer have received zeno, 37 in the eNRGy study and 14 pts in the EAP. As of 12 Jan 2021, treatment is ongoing in 27/51 pts (8/13 pancreas, 10/25 NSCLC, 9/13 other solid tumors). Among the 51 pts, 10 pts with pancreas cancer, 18 pts with NSCLC, and 5 pts with other solid tumors had measurable disease and had the opportunity for ≥1 tumor assessment (TA) and are included in this analysis. Among the 10 pts with pancreas cancer, median age was 49 y (range 34-72), 50% were male, 6/4 pts had ECOG 0/1, and all had metastatic disease and were KRAS wild-type. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1-6). The INV-assessed confirmed ORR was 40% (4/10; 90% CI, 15;70), and for this cohort of pts, responses occurred at the first TA. Tumor regression was seen in 7/10 pts, and the disease control rate was 90% (90% CI, 61-100). A CA 19-9 decline of ≥ 50% was observed in 9/9 (100%) pts. DOR is pending. In the overall NRG1+ population, tumor regression was observed in 25 of 33 pts and confirmed INV-assessed responses were seen in 9 of 33 pts (ORR 27%; 90% CI, 15;43), including in pts who previously received afatinib. Zeno was well tolerated with no pts requiring dose reduction for toxicity. Across all cohorts, for individual AEs, grade 3 events were reported in ≤5% of pts, and there was a notable lack of cardiotoxicity and severe gastrointestinal or skin toxicity. Updated data from all cohorts (pancreas, NSCLC, other solid tumors) will be presented. Conclusions: Zeno induces rapid and major radiologic tumor regression and biomarker responses in heavily-pretreated metastatic KRAS wild-type NRG1+ pancreas cancer, with minimal toxicity. Zeno is a promising novel targeted therapeutic option for pts with NRG1+ cancers. Clinical trial information: NCT02912949.

Safety and preliminary efficacy from the phase 1 portion of MasterKey-01: A First-in-human dose-escalation study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary antitumor activity of BDTX-189, an inhibitor of allosteric ErbB mutations, in patients (pts) with advanced solid malignancies

3086

Background: BDTX-189 is an orally available, ATP-competitive and irreversible inhibitor directed against families of allosteric HER2 and EGFR oncogenic mutations. In preclinical studies BDTX-189 achieved potent inhibition of 48 allosteric HER2 and EGFR/HER2 exon 20 insertion mutant variants with selectivity versus EGFR wild-type (WT) and demonstrated tumor growth inhibition and regression in vivo. The primary objective of the Ph 1 portion of this trial (NCT04209465) is to determine the RP2D and schedule of monotherapy BDTX-189 in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Eligibility includes pts with relapsed or refractory locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with no standard therapy available whose tumor harbors an allosteric HER2 or HER3 mutation; EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutation; HER2 amplification or overexpression; or EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation. BDTX-189 is dosed continuously orally in 3-wk cycles QD and BID in separate dose escalation cohorts. A separate cohort is also evaluating the high- and low-fat food-effect (FE) on BDTX-189 PK. Results: As of 1/11/21, 46 pts have been dosed, with 36 in the QD (fasting) schedule (25-1200 mg), including pts from the FE cohort who received 800 mg QD fasting after FE evaluation: 58% female; 67% white; median age 63.5 yrs; 53% received ≥ 3 prior tx lines. Cancer types: 12 NSCLC, 5 breast, 4 ovary, 3 biliary, and 12 other. Genomic alterations: 23 HER2 amplification and the following mutations: 11 allosteric HER2, 5 EGFR exon 20 insertion, 5 HER2 exon 20 insertion, 3 EGFR exon 19 del./L858R, and 2 HER3. At ≥ 800 mg QD, 3 and 2 pts had EGFR or HER2 exon 20 mutations, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for QD (fasting) was 800 mg, with 2/6 pts with DLTs at 1200 mg. DLTs: gastrointestinal (G3 diarrhea; G1/2 nausea/vomiting). The most frequent (≥20%) related adverse events were diarrhea (36%, 8% G3), nausea (28%, 0% G3), and vomiting (25%, 3% G3). The rate of skin disorders was 11% with the highest severity of G2 in 1 pt. Dose-dependent exposure increases were observed, with the exposure at 800 mg QD fasting within the projected efficacious range. Pilot FE data suggest possible increased exposure with food. 27 pts were evaluable for efficacy, 15 at ≥ 800 mg QD, with 2 partial responses observed: 1 PR confirmed and ongoing (800 mg QD, CUP, HER2 amp, 3 prior lines of chemo) and 1 PR unconfirmed (NSCLC with brain mets, 1200 mg QD, HER2 amp + exon 19 del., 2 prior EGFR TKIs). 3 pts had a best response of SD and 10 with progressive disease. Conclusions: BDTX-189 has a generally manageable safety profile with early evidence of anti-tumor activity. Enrollment is ongoing in non-fasting QD and BID cohorts, and the FE cohort, prior to RP2D identification. Clinical trial information: NCT04209465.

COVID-19 vaccine guidance for patients with cancer participating in oncology clinical trials

Emerging efficacy data have led to the emergency use authorization or approval of COVID-19 vaccines in several countries worldwide. Most trials of COVID-19 vaccines excluded patients with active malignancies, and thus data on the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the vaccines in patients with cancer are currently limited. Given the risk posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, decisions regarding the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in patients participating in trials of investigational anticancer therapies need to be addressed promptly. Patients should not have to choose between enrolling on oncology clinical trials and receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Clinical trial sponsors, investigators and treating physicians need operational guidance on COVID-19 vaccination for patients with cancer who are currently enrolled or might seek to enrol in clinical trials. Considering the high morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 in patients with cancer, the benefits of vaccination are likely to far outweigh the risks of vaccine-related adverse events. Herein, we provide operational COVID-19 vaccine guidance for patients participating in oncology clinical trials. In our perspective, continued quality oncological care requires that patients with cancer, including those involved in trials, be prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination, which should not affect trial eligibility.

IgE blockade with omalizumab reduces pruritus related to immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-HER2 therapies

Background:

Immunoglobulin E (IgE) blockade with omalizumab has demonstrated clinical benefit in pruritus-associated dermatoses (e.g. atopic dermatitis, bullous pemphigoid, urticaria). In oncology, pruritus-associated cutaneous adverse events (paCAEs) are frequent with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and targeted anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies. Thus, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IgE blockade with omalizumab in cancer patients with refractory paCAEs related to CPIs and anti-HER2 agents.

Patients and methods:

Patients included in this multicenter retrospective analysis received monthly subcutaneous injections of omalizumab for CPI or anti-HER2 therapy-related grade 2/3 pruritus that was refractory to topical corticosteroids plus at least one additional systemic intervention. To assess clinical response to omalizumab, we used the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The primary endpoint was defined as reduction in the severity of paCAEs to grade 1/0.

Results:

A total of 34 patients (50% female, median age 67.5 years) received omalizumab for cancer therapy-related paCAEs (71% CPIs; 29% anti-HER2). All had solid tumors (29% breast, 29% genitourinary, 15% lung, 26% other), and most (n = 18, 64%) presented with an urticarial phenotype. In total, 28 of 34 (82%) patients responded to omalizumab. The proportion of patients receiving oral corticosteroids as supportive treatment for management of paCAEs decreased with IgE blockade, from 50% to 9% (P < 0.001). Ten of 32 (31%) patients had interruption of oncologic therapy due to skin toxicity; four of six (67%) were successfully rechallenged following omalizumab. There were no reports of anaphylaxis or hypersensitivity reactions related to omalizumab.

Conclusions:

IgE blockade with omalizumab demonstrated clinical efficacy and was well tolerated in cancer patients with pruritus related to CPIs and anti-HER2 therapies.

TRK xDFG Mutations Trigger a Sensitivity Switch from Type I to II Kinase Inhibitors

On-target resistance to next-generation TRK inhibitors in TRK fusion-positive cancers is largely uncharacterized. In patients with these tumors, we found that TRK xDFG mutations confer resistance to type I next-generation TRK inhibitors designed to maintain potency against several kinase domain mutations. Computational modeling and biochemical assays showed that TRKA^G667 and TRKC^G696 xDFG substitutions reduce drug binding by generating steric hindrance. Concurrently, these mutations stabilize the inactive (DFG-out) conformations of the kinases, thus sensitizing these kinases to type II TRK inhibitors. Consistently, type II inhibitors impede the growth and TRK-mediated signaling of xDFG-mutant isogenic and patient-derived models. Collectively, these data demonstrate that adaptive conformational resistance can be abrogated by shifting kinase engagement modes. Given the prior identification of paralogous xDFG resistance mutations in other oncogene-addicted cancers, these findings provide insights into rational type II drug design by leveraging inhibitor class affinity switching to address recalcitrant resistant alterations. SIGNIFICANCE: In TRK fusion-positive cancers, TRK xDFG substitutions represent a shared liability for type I TRK inhibitors. In contrast, they represent a potential biomarker of type II TRK inhibitor activity. As all currently available type II agents are multikinase inhibitors, rational drug design should focus on selective type II inhibitor creation.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1.

Clinical implications of drug-induced liver injury in early-phase oncology clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Data on drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and acute liver failure (ALF) in modern phase 1 oncology trials are limited, specifically with respect to the incidence and resolution of DILI and the safety of drug rechallenge.

METHODS

This study reviewed all patients who were recruited to phase 1 oncology trials between 2013 and 2017 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Clinicopathologic data were extracted to characterize DILI, and attribution was assessed on the basis of data prospectively generated during the studies. Logistic regression models were used to explore factors related to DILI and DILI recurrence after drug rechallenge.

RESULTS

Among 1670 cases recruited to 85 phase 1 trials, 81 (4.9%) developed DILI. The rate of DILI occurrence was similar for patients in immune-based trials and patients in targeted therapy trials (5.0% vs 4.9%), as was the median time to DILI (5.5 vs 6.5 weeks; P = .48). Two patients (0.12%) met the criteria of Hy's law, although none developed ALF. The DILI resolved in 96% of the patients. Pretreatment factors were not predictive for DILI development. Thirty-six of the 81 patients underwent a drug rechallenge, and 28% of these patients developed DILI recurrence. Peak alanine aminotransferase during the initial DILI was associated with DILI recurrence (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.09; P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

In modern phase 1 oncology trials, DILI is uncommon, may occur at any time, and often resolves with supportive measures. Rechallenging after DILI is feasible; however, the high rate of DILI recurrence suggests that clinicians should consider the severity of the DILI episode and treatment alternatives.

Abstract 5280: Kinase fusions drive endocrine resistance in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Oncogenic kinase activation by gene fusions can promote cancer development and tumor progression, however, kinase fusions have not been characterized extensively in breast cancer. In this study, we characterized kinase fusions in a large cohort of 4854 breast cancer patients using clinical DNA and/or RNA next generation sequencing platforms. Twenty-seven cases harboring kinase fusions were identified, including 11 FGFR (5 FGFR2, 3 FGFR3, 3 FGFR1), 5 BRAF, 4 NTRK1, 2 RET, 2 ROS1, 1 ALK, 1 ERBB2, and 1 MET. Eight patients with a history of endocrine therapy had available pre-treatment samples, of which six were negative for kinase fusion, and ESR1 hotspot mutations were not observed in any of these kinase fusion-positive samples. These findings suggest a potential role for kinase fusions in endocrine therapy resistance and prompted us to model the kinase fusions in human breast cancer cell lines. Ectopic expression of LMNA-NTRK1 fusion kinase activated growth factor signaling cascades, including PI3K-AKT and MAPK-ERK pathways, and promoted hormone-independent growth in MCF7 and T47D cells. Enforced expression of the LMNA-NTRK1 fusion conferred resistance to the ER antagonist fulvestrant and combined treatment of fulvestrant and the Trk inhibitor larotrectinib completely blocked the growth of LMNA-NTRK+ breast cancer cells. Similarly, expression of the EML4-ALK fusion also activated growth factor signaling pathways and caused resistance to estrogen depletion and induced sensitivity to the ALK inhibitor, Ceritinib. Treatment of xenografted LMNA-NTRK1 expressing tumors confirmed the efficacy of the combined treatment of antiestrogen and NTRK1 inhibition in vivo. Two patients with acquired LMNA-NTRK1 fusions and metastatic disease received larotrectinib and demonstrated clinical benefit. Overall, our findings demonstrate that kinase fusions promote endocrine resistance in ER-positive breast cancer, and suggest that fusion screening in advanced breast cancer, particularly those with ER-positive breast cancer at progression on hormone therapy can identify rare tumors harboring targetable kinase fusions.

Citation Format: Bo Liu, Dara S. Ross, Alison M. Schram, Pedram Razavi, Stephen M. Lagana, Yanming Zhang, Maurizio Scaltriti, Jacqueline F. Bromberg, Marc Ladanyi, David M. Hyman, Alexander Drilon, Ahmet Zahir, Ryma Benayed, Jaclyn F. Hechtman, Sarat Chandarlapaty. Kinase fusions drive endocrine resistance in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5280.

Abstract 5680: TRK xDFG mutations trigger a sensitivity switch from type I to II kinase inhibitors

Background: TRK inhibition is the standard of care for patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumors. TRK kinase domain mutations that impair drug binding are common mechanisms of resistance to 1st-generation TRK inhibitors. While 2nd-generation TRK inhibitors were designed to maintain kinase inhibition in this setting, the resistance to these agents is still poorly characterized.

Methods and Results: We sequenced paired tumor biopsies and serial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) collected before therapy and at progression from patients treated with 2nd-generation TRK inhibitors (selitrectinib or repotrectinib). We identified 5 cases in which the acquisition of xDFG (G667) TRKA mutations was associated with resistance. Two patients whose tumors carried these substitutions pre-selitrectinib never responded to therapy, while three additional cases acquired these mutations upon progression to either selitrectinib or repotrectinib.

In-silico molecular modeling combined with molecular dynamic simulations predicted that TRKA xDFG substitutions can confer resistance to 2nd-generation TRK inhibitors by generating steric hindrance that compromises drug binding. Accordingly, in vitro kinase assays showed that the IC50 for selitrectinib of TRKA xDFG mutants was &gt;12 to &gt;8000 fold higher compared to the IC50 of either TRKA wild type or the selitrectinib-sensitive TRKA G595R solvent front mutant.

Interestingly, our data also suggest that TRKA xDFG substitutions induce conformational changes that stabilize the inactive (xDFG-out) conformation of the kinase, thus sensitizing it to type II inhibition. In vitro microscale thermophoresis revealed that the binding affinity of type II TRK inhibitors (cabozantinib or foretinib) to the TRKA G667C-mutant kinase was 8-10-fold higher compared to the type I inhibitor selitrectinib. We then tested the efficacy of type II TRK inhibitors against TRKA xDFG mutants in different cell models. A Bcan-Ntrk1-driven mouse model knocked in by CRISPR Cas9 to express the xDFG mutations was sensitive to type II but not to type I TRK inhibitors. Similar results were obtained using an LMNA-NTRK1-positive colorectal cell line that acquired the G667C substitution upon chronic selitrectinib treatment.

Type II TRK inhibitor therapy achieved complete and durable responses also in patient-derived models with TRKA xDFG-mediated resistance to type I 2nd-generation agents.

Conclusions: Our study uncovers a molecular switch induced by xDFG mutations that limits the sensitivity to type I kinase inhibitors by conformational changes that favor the inactive xDFG-out kinase state. This same switch in turn sensitizes these mutant kinases to type II inhibitors that effectively engage this inactive conformation. These results provide a paradigm for the rational development of 3rd-generation TKIs that address the problem of conformational resistance in tumors that are driven by oncogenic kinases.

Citation Format: Emiliano Cocco, Ji Eun Lee, Srinivasaraghavan Kannan, Alison M. Schram, Helen H. Won, Sophie Shifman, Amanda Kulick, Laura Baldino, Eneda Toska, Sabrina Arena, Benedetta Mussolin, Ram Kannan, Neil Vasan, Alexander N. Gorelick, Michael F. Berger, Yi Liao, Uwe Rix, Alberto Bardelli, Jacklyn Hechtman, Elisa de Stanchina, David M. Hyman, Chandra Verma, Andrea Ventura, Alexander Drilon, Maurizio Scaltriti. TRK xDFG mutations trigger a sensitivity switch from type I to II kinase inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5680.

Discovery through clinical sequencing in oncology

The molecular characterization of tumors now informs clinical cancer care for many patients. This advent of molecular oncology is driven by the expanding number of therapeutic biomarkers that can predict sensitivity to both approved and investigational agents. Beyond its role in driving clinical trial enrollments and guiding therapy in individual patients, large-scale clinical genomics in oncology also represents a rapidly expanding research resource for translational scientific discovery. Here, we review the progress, opportunities, and challenges of scientific and translational discovery from prospective clinical genomic screening programs now routinely conducted in cancer patients.

Abstract 16: Landscape and outcome of TRK fusion-positive Cancers

TRK inhibitors achieve marked tumor-agnostic efficacy in TRK fusion-positive cancers and consequently are now an established standard of care. Little is known, however, about the demographics, clinical outcomes, response to alternative standard therapies, or genomic characteristics of TRK fusion-positive cancers. Utilizing a center-wide screening program involving more than 26,000 prospectively sequenced patients, genomic and clinical data from all cases with identified TRK fusions were extracted. An integrated analysis was performed of genomic, therapeutic, and phenomic outcomes. In total, we identified 76 cases with confirmed TRK fusions (0.27% overall prevalence) involving 48 unique rearrangements and 17 distinct cancer types. The presence of a TRK fusion was associated with depletion of concurrent oncogenic drivers (p=4.4E-7) and lower tumor mutation burden (p=4.2E-9), with the exception of colorectal cancer where TRK fusions co-occur with microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Longitudinal profiling in a subset of patients indicated that TRK fusions were present in all sampled timepoints in 82% (14/17) of cases. Progression-free survival on first-line therapy, excluding TRK inhibitors, administered for advanced disease was 9.6 months (95% CI: 4.8-13.2). The best ORR achieved with chemotherapy containing-regimens across all lines of therapy was 63% (95% CI: 41-81). Among 12 patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, the only response observed was in an MSI-H colorectal patient. TRK fusion-positive cancers can respond to alternative standards of care, although efficacy of immunotherapy in the absence of other predictive biomarkers (MSI-H) appears limited. TRK fusions are present in tumors with simple genomes lacking in concurrent drivers that may partially explain the tumor-agnostic efficacy of TRK inhibitors.

Citation Format: Ezra Y. Rosen, Debra A. Goldman, Jaclyn F. Hechtman, Ryma Benayed, Alison M. Schram, Emiliano Cocco, Sophie Shifman, Yixiao Gong, Ritika Kundra, James P. Solomon, Alberto Bardelli, Maurizio Scaltriti, Alexander Drilon, Alexia Iasonos, Barry S. Taylor, David M. Hyman. Landscape and outcome of TRK fusion-positive Cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advancing Precision Medicine Drug Development: Incorporation of Real-World Data and Other Novel Strategies; Jan 9-12, 2020; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(12_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 16.

Masterkey-01: Phase I/II, open-label multicenter study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of BDTX-189, an inhibitor of allosteric ErbB mutations, in patients with advanced solid malignancies

TPS3665

Background: A significant unmet need exists for drugs targeting allosteric ErbB mutations (non-canonical mutations outside the ATP binding site). Current EGFR and HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors or mAbs have limited antitumor activity against allosteric mutations, resulting in toxicity before adequate drug exposure (Connell and Doherty, 2017). BDTX-189 is a potent and selective orally available irreversible inhibitor targeting unique oncogenic driver mutations of ErbB kinases in EGFR and HER2, while sparing WT EGFR. Preclinical studies demonstrated antitumor activity across a range of allosteric ErbB mutants, including extracellular domain allosteric mutations of HER2 as well as EGFR and HER2 kinase domain exon 20 insertions (Buck, 2019). This first-in-human trial (NCT04209465) is aimed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2) and schedule (Phase 1, P1), and evaluate the efficacy (Phase 2, P2) of BDTX-189. P1 primary objective is to determine the RP2 dose and schedule of monotherapy BDTX-189. Secondary objectives include assessment of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) effects in tumor, and preliminary efficacy. The P2 primary objective is to assess antitumor activity of monotherapy BDTX-189. Methods: The study will enroll patients (pts) ≥18 yrs with histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with no standard therapy available or for whom standard therapy is unsuitable or intolerable. P1 dose-escalation will use a BOIN design (Yuan, 2016) and will enroll ≤ 88 pts with allosteric HER2 or HER3 mutation; EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutation; HER2 amplified or overexpressing tumor; or EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation. BDTX-189 will be dosed orally (PO) initially QD in 3 wk cycles. Regimen optimization will use PK, PD and safety data and may explore a BID schedule. An expansion cohort of ≤12 pts will further evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of BDTX-189 prior to P2. P2, utilizing a Simon 2-stage design, will enroll ≤100 pts with NSCLC with EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations (cohort 1); breast cancer with an allosteric ErbB mutation (cohort 2); tumors (except breast) with S310F/Y mutation (cohort 3); and other allosteric ErbB mutations not defined in cohorts 1-3 (cohort 4). Assessments include safety, tolerability, DLTs, evaluation of MTD, PK, PD, and preliminary antitumor activity. Enrollment began 1/2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04209465 .

The impact of poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors on clonal hematopoiesis

1513

Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are an important new class of anti-cancer therapies. Therapy-related myeloid neoplasia (tMN) has been reported following PARPi therapy, and is associated with adverse outcomes. Further insight is required into the risk of tMN conferred by PARPi therapy, independent of germline genetic background and prior therapy. We have shown that oncologic therapy selects for acquired mutations in the blood (clonal hematopoiesis; CH) particularly those in the DNA damage response pathway (DDR) including PPM1D, TP53 and CHEK2 and that CH confers an increased risk of tMN. We hypothesized that characterization of the relationship between CH and PARPi therapy provides insight into its potential for leukemogenesis and may offer opportunities for tMN prevention. Methods: We assessed for CH in the blood of 10,156 cancer patients, including 54 who received PARPi therapy, 5942 who received another systematic therapy or radiation therapy and 4160 untreated prior to blood draw. Results: Patients exposed to PARPi therapy were more likely to have CH (33%) compared to those exposed to other systemic therapies or radiation (18%) or untreated patients (16%). This was particularly pronounced for DDR CH; 25% of PARPi treated patients had DDR CH compared to 2% of untreated patients. In a multivariable model accounting for demographics, exposure to chemotherapeutic agents, radiation therapy and germline BRCA mutation status, exposure to PARPi conferred an increased risk of DDR CH (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.5-8.5, p = 0.004). This effect was attenuated after accounting for cumulative exposure to therapy (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 0.97-8.2, p = 0.06) suggesting a multifactorial contribution to the enrichment of CH following PARPi therapy. To characterize this further we performed a prospective collection of patients with CH over a median follow-up time of 58 months. During the follow-up period, 17 patients received PARPi, 360 received cytotoxic therapies or radiation and 232 were untreated or received targeted therapies. The growth rate of DDR CH was significantly higher among those who were exposed to PARPi (median, +2.8% increase in VAF per year) compared to untreated patients (+0.08% per year, p = 0.02) and those exposed to other cytotoxic therapies (+1% per year, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Taken together our data suggests that PARPi therapy promotes the expansion of DDR CH. Future studies should examine the potential of CH to identify individuals at high risk of tMN following PARPi therapy and to develop therapies aimed to prevent tMN in patients with CH.

Basket study of the oral progesterone antagonist onapristone ER in women with progesterone receptor positive (PR+) recurrent granulosa cell tumor (GCT), low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC), or endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC)

TPS6098

Background: Onapristone extended release (ER) is a type I full progesterone antagonist that inhibits progesterone mediated PR activation and stabilizes PR association with corepressors. Onapristone has shown activity across multiple preclinical models of hormonally driven cancer. A phase I dose escalation study of onapristone ER in PR+ breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer patients found all doses tested to be well tolerated, with 50mg PO BID determined to be the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). GCT (98% of cases PR+), LGSOC (58% of cases PR+) and EEC (67% of cases PR+) are hormonally driven cancers which generally have poor responses to chemotherapy and limited treatment options in the recurrent setting. Methods: This is an open-label, investigator-initiated basket study of onapristone ER in patients with PR+ recurrent GCT, LGSOC, or EEC currently enrolling patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in NY, USA (NCT03909152). The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy, in terms of response rate by RECIST 1.1 criteria, within 36 weeks of treatment. Eligible patients must have received at least 1 prior line of chemotherapy, have measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria, and have tumor tissue collected within 3 years prior to enrollment with PR expression ≥ 1% by IHC. Patients are allowed to have unlimited additional prior lines of chemotherapy, biologic therapy, immunotherapy or hormonal therapy. Enrolled patients are treated with onapristone ER 50mg PO BID until time of progression or intolerable toxicity. The 3 disease cohorts are currently enrolling to Stage I in parallel with expansion from stage I to stage II planned when the prespecified response criteria are met for each cohort as described in the table below. Clinical trial information: NCT03909152. [Table: see text]

Results of a first-in-human phase I study of SRF231, a fully human, high-affinity anti-CD47 antibody

3064

Background: CD47 is a transmembrane protein that acts as a “Don’t Eat Me” signal to evade immune recognition. It is overexpressed in multiple cancer subtypes and is associated with poor prognosis. SRF231 is an investigational, fully human, high-affinity CD47-targeting antibody that delivers an activating signal to myeloid cells and displays favorable preclinical characteristics regarding its receptor occupancy/tumor exposure/efficacy relationship. Methods: In a Phase 1 study, SRF231-101 (NCT03512340), patients with advanced solid and hematologic malignancies who had failed standard therapy were enrolled in dose escalation cohorts (accelerated single-patient followed by standard 3+3) to establish the preliminary safety of SRF231 as a monotherapy and identify a dose and schedule suitable for expansion. In addition to collection of safety data, clinical outcomes were evaluated based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) and SRF231 pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (receptor occupancy) analyses were performed. Results: As of January 11, 2020, a total of 46 patients were enrolled, 25 in every-3-week intravenous (IV) dosing schedules and 21 in weekly IV dosing schedules. Weekly dosing schedules also explored the use of a 1.0 mg/kg initiation dose. Other than one patient with recurrent follicular lymphoma, all patients had recurrent/refractory solid tumors. The most common treatment emergent adverse events across dosing schedules were low-grade fatigue (43%), headache (35%), and pyrexia (30%). On every-3-week dosing schedules, 2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed: Grade 3 febrile neutropenia and Grade 3 hemolysis, both at a 12.0 mg/kg dose level. On weekly dosing schedules, 3 DLTs were observed: Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (6.0 mg/kg), Grade 4 amylase and lipase increased (4.0 mg/kg with initiation dose), and Grade 3 fatigue (4.0 mg/kg). The maximum tolerated dose was 9.0 mg/kg on an every-3-week and 4.0 mg/kg on a weekly schedule. Receptor occupancy was maintained at > 90% throughout the dosing period with a 4.0 mg/kg weekly dose schedule. Out of 37 patients who were response evaluable by RECIST, there were no complete or partial responders, although prolonged stable disease has been observed. Conclusions: Preliminary data from a Phase 1 study of SRF231, an anti-CD47 antibody, demonstrate that SRF231 may be administered safely and doses of 4.0 mg/kg weekly maintain > 90% receptor occupancy throughout the dosing period. Updated safety data, clinical outcomes, and PK/pharmacodynamic data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03512340 .

A phase II basket study of MCLA-128, a bispecific antibody targeting the HER3 pathway, in NRG1 fusion-positive advanced solid tumors

TPS3654

Background: NRG1 fusions are oncogenic drivers across various cancers. NRG1 fusion proteins bind to HER3, leading to HER2/HER3 heterodimerization, increased downstream signaling, and tumor growth. Clinical responses to anti-HER3 antibodies or HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been reported. In contrast to these agents, MCLA-128 is a HER2/HER3 bispecific antibody that blocks both NRG1 binding and HER2/3 dimerization. Two patients with chemotherapy-resistant ATP1B1-NRG1-positive pancreatic KRAS-wild-type adenocarcinomas who received MCLA-128 through FDA-approved single-patient Investigational New Drug (IND) applications showed significant tumor shrinkage and durable tumor marker (CA-19-9) response. These data support the evaluation of MCLA-128 in NRG1 fusion-positive tumors using a basket approach. Methods: This is a global, open-label, multicenter phase 2 basket trial of MCLA-128 in patients with solid tumors harboring NRG1 gene fusions. Main eligibility criteria are locally advanced unresectable or metastatic cancers harboring an NRG1 fusion, and failure under prior standard therapy appropriate for the tumor type and disease stage. Genomic screening of tumor tissue is done at a local laboratory (with post-hoc central confirmation) or central laboratory (RNA sequencing). Three NRG1 fusion-positive tumor cohorts are being evaluated: pancreatic cancer, NSCLC, and other solid tumors. The sample size for the first two cohorts is up to 25 patients; the basket group may enroll up to 40 patients. The primary endpoint for all cohorts is investigator-assessed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1). The key secondary endpoint is duration of response. Other secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival. Eligible patients receive a bi-weekly dosing regimen of 750 mg of MCLA-128 (2-hour infusion), every 2 weeks, in 4-week cycles. The study is actively accruing patients in North America, Europe, and Asia. Previously presented at ESMO 2019, 685TiP, Schram et al.-Reused with permission. Clinical trial information: NCT02912949 .

Enrichment of kinase fusions in ESR1 wild-type, metastatic breast cancer revealed by a systematic analysis of 4854 patients

BACKGROUND

Kinase fusions are rare and poorly characterized in breast cancer (BC). We aimed to characterize kinase fusions within a large cohort of advanced BC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 4854 patients with BC were analyzed by Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) targeted DNAseq and MSK-Fusion targeted RNAseq during the study time period.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of 4854 (0.6%) patients harbored fusions: 11 FGFR (five FGFR2, three FGFR3, three FGFR1), five BRAF, four NTRK1, two RET, two ROS1, one ALK, one ERBB2, and one MET. A history of endocrine therapy was present in 15 (56%) of fusion-positive BC; eight of the 15 cases had available pre-treatment samples, of which six were fusion-negative. None of the fusion-positive BC samples harbored ESR1 hotspot mutations. Two patients with acquired LMNA-NTRK1 fusions and metastatic disease received larotrectinib and demonstrated clinical benefit.

CONCLUSION

Kinase fusions in BC are extremely rare, and appear to be enriched in hormone-resistant, metastatic carcinomas and mutually exclusive with ESR1 mutations. The present study expands the spectrum of genetic alterations activating mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling that can substitute for ESR1 mutations in this setting. Molecular testing at progression after endocrine therapy should include fusion testing, particularly in the absence of ESR1 hotspot alterations, in an effort to identify additional therapeutic options which may provide substantial clinical benefit.

Toward a More Precise Future for Oncology

Prospective molecular characterization of cancer has enabled physicians to define the genomic changes of each patient's tumor in real time and select personalized therapies based on these detailed portraits. Despite the promise of such an approach, previously unrecognized biological and therapeutic complexity is emerging. Here, we synthesize lessons learned and discuss the steps required to extend the benefits of genome-driven oncology, including proposing strategies for improved drug design, more nuanced patient selection, and optimized use of available therapies. Finally, we suggest ways that next-generation genome-driven clinical trials can evolve to accelerate our understanding of cancer biology and improve patient outcomes.

TRK Fusions Are Enriched in Cancers with Uncommon Histologies and the Absence of Canonical Driver Mutations

PURPOSE

TRK inhibitors achieve marked tumor-agnostic efficacy in TRK fusion-positive cancers and consequently are now an established standard of care. Little is known, however, about the demographics, outcomes, response to alternative standard therapies, or genomic characteristics of TRK fusion-positive cancers.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Utilizing a center-wide screening program involving more than 26,000 prospectively sequenced patients, genomic and clinical data from all cases with TRK fusions were extracted. An integrated analysis was performed of genomic, therapeutic, and phenomic outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 76 cases with confirmed TRK fusions (0.28% overall prevalence) involving 48 unique rearrangements and 17 cancer types. The presence of a TRK fusion was associated with depletion of concurrent oncogenic drivers (P < 0.001) and lower tumor mutation burden (P < 0.001), with the exception of colorectal cancer where TRK fusions cooccur with microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Longitudinal profiling in a subset of patients indicated that TRK fusions were present in all sampled timepoints in 82% (14/17) of cases. Progression-free survival on first-line therapy, excluding TRK inhibitors, administered for advanced disease was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8-13.2]. The best overall response rate achieved with chemotherapy containing-regimens across all lines of therapy was 63% (95% CI, 41-81). Among 12 patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, a patient with MSI-H colorectal cancer had the only observed response.

CONCLUSIONS

TRK fusion-positive cancers can respond to alternative standards of care, although efficacy of immunotherapy in the absence of other predictive biomarkers (MSI-H) appears limited. TRK fusions are present in tumors with simple genomes lacking in concurrent drivers that may partially explain the tumor-agnostic efficacy of TRK inhibitors.