1
|
Gong Q, Halstead J, Keenan AM, Milanese S, Redmond AC, Arnold JB. Intrinsic foot muscle size and associations with strength, pain and foot-related disability in people with midfoot osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2023; 101:105865. [PMID: 36565560 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare intrinsic foot muscle size between people with and without symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis, and examine the association between muscle size and strength, pain and foot-related disability. METHODS Twenty-three participants with symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis and 23 age, sex and BMI matched controls were included. Intrinsic foot muscle cross-sectional area was measured using MRI. Hand-held dynamometry was used to assess foot and ankle muscle strength, and foot-related pain and disability was measured using Manchester Foot Pain & Disability Index. FINDINGS Small and non-statistically significant differences were found in intrinsic foot muscle cross-sectional area between the two groups (effect sizes 0.15-0.26, p > 0.05). Muscle strength was reduced in the midfoot osteoarthritis group, with differences of 12-33% (effect sizes 0.47-1.2). In the control group, moderate positive associations) existed between foot muscle cross-sectional area and lesser digits flexor strength (r = 0.5 to 0.7, p < 0.05). Conversely, in the midfoot osteoarthritis group, negligible positive associations were found (r < 0.3, p > 0.05). Associations between foot muscle cross-sectional with and pain and disability scores in the midfoot osteoarthritis group were negligible (r < -0.3, p > 0.05). INTERPRETATION Despite reductions in maximal isometric muscle strength, midfoot osteoarthritis does not appear to be associated with reduced intrinsic foot muscle cross-sectional area measured by MRI. Muscle compositional or neural factors may explain the reductions in muscle strength and variation in symptoms in people with midfoot osteoarthritis and should be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qun Gong
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jill Halstead
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, UK; Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, UK; School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Steve Milanese
- International Centre for Allied Health Evidence (iCAHE), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Anthony C Redmond
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, UK
| | - John B Arnold
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anderson AM, Chapman LS, Siddle HJ, Watson S, Klugerman J, Antcliff D, Keenan AM, Brockett CL. "I could have a proper ankle" - a qualitative study of patients' perceptions of total ankle replacement and ankle fusion surgery. J Foot Ankle Res 2022; 15:88. [PMID: 36503504 PMCID: PMC9743489 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-022-00595-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-stage ankle osteoarthritis typically causes severe pain and impaired function. Surgical treatment involves total ankle replacement (TAR) or ankle fusion. Definitive evidence about which procedure is optimal is lacking. No previous studies have thoroughly explored patients' experiences across the entire TAR/ankle fusion pathway. This study aimed to address this gap by exploring perceptions of surgery, education, rehabilitation and outcomes among patients who had undergone TAR or ankle fusion. METHODS Seven participants were purposively selected from an orthopaedic centre in northern England (3 females, 4 males). Participants had undergone primary TAR without revision (n = 2), TAR requiring revision (n = 3) or ankle fusion (n = 2). Each participant completed a single semi-structured interview. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. RESULTS Three themes, each with two subthemes, were identified: decision-making (seeking help; surgical options), perceptions of support (information/education; clinical support) and impact on the individual (personal circumstances and beliefs; post-operative outcomes). Pain affecting participants' valued activities was key to their decision to seek help. Participants' decision between TAR and ankle fusion was influenced by multiple factors. Concerns regarding the lack of joint flexibility following fusion were highlighted, with some participants perceiving TAR as a "proper ankle" that would enable them to avoid limping. Participants obtained information from various sources, with most feeling that the education from their care team was inadequate. Participants' individual circumstances and beliefs influenced their decision-making and perceptions of their post-operative outcomes. Finally, whilst most participants were pleased with their outcomes, some experienced substantial ongoing problems such as difficulty walking and chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the importance of providing adequate education about TAR and ankle fusion to enable patients to make informed decisions. Most participants felt that the education and clinical support they received did not fully meet their needs. Participants' personal circumstances and beliefs had a strong influence on their decision-making and perceptions of their post-operative outcomes, highlighting the need to personally tailor education and clinical support. Future work with a larger sample of patients and other key stakeholders is required to develop consensus-based guidelines on pre- and post-operative support for patients undergoing TAR/ankle fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M. Anderson
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ,grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ,grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lara S. Chapman
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Heidi J. Siddle
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sue Watson
- Leeds National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Jane Klugerman
- Leeds National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Deborah Antcliff
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ,grid.451052.70000 0004 0581 2008Bury Integrated Pain Service, Bury Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Bury, England, UK ,grid.9757.c0000 0004 0415 6205School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ,Leeds National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire L. Brockett
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ovseiko PV, Gossec L, Andreoli L, Kiltz U, van Mens L, Hassan N, van der Leeden M, Siddle HJ, Alunno A, McInnes IB, Damjanov NS, Apparailly F, Ospelt C, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Nikiphorou E, Druce KL, Szekanecz Z, Sepriano A, Avcin T, Bertsias G, Schett G, Keenan AM, Pololi LH, Coates LC. Gender equity in academic rheumatology, current status and potential for improvement: a cross-sectional study to inform an EULAR task force. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002518. [PMID: 35940824 PMCID: PMC9367178 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evidence on the current status of gender equity in academic rheumatology in Europe and potential for its improvement is limited. The EULAR convened a task force to obtain empirical evidence on the potential unmet need for support of female rheumatologists, health professionals and non-clinical scientists in academic rheumatology. METHODS This cross-sectional study comprised three web-based surveys conducted in 2020 among: (1) EULAR scientific member society leaders, (2) EULAR and Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET) members and (3) EULAR Council members. Statistics were descriptive with significance testing for male/female responses assessed by χ2 test and t-test. RESULTS Data from EULAR scientific member societies in 13 countries indicated that there were disproportionately fewer women in academic rheumatology than in clinical rheumatology, and they tended to be under-represented in senior academic roles. From 324 responses of EULAR and EMEUNET members (24 countries), we detected no gender differences in leadership aspirations, self-efficacy in career advancement and work-life integration as well as the share of time spent on research, but there were gender differences in working hours and the levels of perceived gender discrimination and sexual harassment. There were gender differences in the ranking of 7 of 26 factors impacting career advancement and of 8 of 24 potential interventions to aid career advancement. CONCLUSIONS There are gender differences in career advancement in academic rheumatology. The study informs a EULAR task force developing a framework of potential interventions to accelerate gender-equitable career advancement in academic rheumatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel V Ovseiko
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Laure Gossec
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France.,Rheumatology Department, APHP.Sorbonne Universite, Hopital Universitaire Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
| | - Laura Andreoli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.,Unit of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Uta Kiltz
- Department of Rheumatology, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Leonieke van Mens
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neelam Hassan
- Department of Rheumatology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.,Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Marike van der Leeden
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Reade Centre for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heidi J Siddle
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Alessia Alunno
- Internal Medicine and Nephrology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Iain B McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nemanja S Damjanov
- University of Belgrade School of Medicine, Medigroup Hospital, Rheumatology, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Caroline Ospelt
- Center of Experimental Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Rheumatology Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK.,Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Katie L Druce
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Zoltán Szekanecz
- Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Tadej Avcin
- Department of Allergology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - George Bertsias
- Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Georg Schett
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine 3, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK
| | - Linda H Pololi
- National Initiative on Gender, Culture and Leadership in Medicine: C-Change, Women's Studies Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Laura C Coates
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK .,Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Drake C, Whittaker GA, Kaminski MR, Chen J, Keenan AM, Rathleff MS, Robinson P, Landorf KB. Medical imaging for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 2022; 15:4. [PMID: 35065676 PMCID: PMC8783477 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-021-00507-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Medical imaging can be used to assist with the diagnosis of plantar heel pain. The aim of this study was to synthesise medical imaging features associated with plantar heel pain. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis conducted searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to 12th February 2021. Peer-reviewed articles of cross-sectional observational studies written in English that compared medical imaging findings in adult participants with plantar heel pain to control participants without plantar heel pain were included. Study quality and risk of bias was assessed using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Sensitivity analyses were conducted where appropriate to account for studies that used unblinded assessors. Results Forty-two studies (2928 participants) were identified and included in analyses. Only 21% of studies were rated ‘good’ on quality assessment. Imaging features associated with plantar heel pain included a thickened plantar fascia (on ultrasound and MRI), abnormalities of the plantar fascia (on ultrasound and MRI), abnormalities of adjacent tissue such as a thickened loaded plantar heel fat pad (on ultrasound), and a plantar calcaneal spur (on x-ray). In addition, there is some evidence from more than one study that there is increased hyperaemia within the fascia (on power Doppler ultrasound) and abnormalities of bone in the calcaneus (increased uptake on technetium-99 m bone scan and bone marrow oedema on MRI). Conclusions People with plantar heel pain are more likely to have a thickened plantar fascia, abnormal plantar fascia tissue, a thicker loaded plantar heel fat pad, and a plantar calcaneal spur. In addition, there is some evidence of hyperaemia within the plantar fascia and abnormalities of the calcaneus. Whilst these medical imaging features may aid with diagnosis, additional high-quality studies investigating medical imaging findings for some of these imaging features would be worthwhile to improve the precision of these findings and determine their clinical relevance. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00507-2.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mebrahtu TF, Skyrme S, Randell R, Keenan AM, Bloor K, Yang H, Andre D, Ledward A, King H, Thompson C. Effects of computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review of experimental and observational studies. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e053886. [PMID: 34911719 PMCID: PMC8679061 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are an increasingly important part of nurse and allied health professional (AHP) roles in delivering healthcare. The impact of these technologies on these health professionals' performance and patient outcomes has not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to conduct a systematic review to investigate this. MATERIALS AND METHODS The following bibliographic databases and grey literature sources were searched by an experienced Information Professional for published and unpublished research from inception to February 2021 without language restrictions: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase Classic+Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), HMIC (Ovid), AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine) (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley), Social Sciences Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate), ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Abstracts & Index, ProQuest ASSIA (Applied Social Science Index and Abstract), Clinical Trials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry (ICTRP), Health Services Research Projects in Progress (HSRProj), OpenClinical(www.OpenClinical.org), OpenGrey (www.opengrey.eu), Health.IT.gov, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (www.ahrq.gov). Any comparative research studies comparing CDSS with usual care were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS A total of 36 106 non-duplicate records were identified. Of 35 included studies: 28 were randomised trials, three controlled-before-and-after studies, three interrupted-time-series and one non-randomised trial. There were ~1318 health professionals and ~67 595 patient participants in the studies. Most studies focused on nurse decision-makers (71%) or paramedics (5.7%). CDSS as a standalone Personal Computer/LAPTOP-technology was a feature of 88.7% of the studies; only 8.6% of the studies involved 'smart' mobile/handheld-technology. DISCUSSION CDSS impacted 38% of the outcome measures used positively. Care processes were better in 47% of the measures adopted; examples included, nurses' adherence to hand disinfection guidance, insulin dosing, on-time blood sampling and documenting care. Patient care outcomes in 40.7% of indicators were better; examples included, lower numbers of falls and pressure ulcers, better glycaemic control, screening of malnutrition and obesity and triaging appropriateness. CONCLUSION CDSS may have a positive impact on selected aspects of nurses' and AHPs' performance and care outcomes. However, comparative research is generally low quality, with a wide range of heterogeneous outcomes. After more than 13 years of synthesised research into CDSS in healthcare professions other than medicine, the need for better quality evaluative research remains as pressing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Skyrme
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca Randell
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Karen Bloor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Huiqin Yang
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Henry King
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Carl Thompson
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Antcliff D, Keenan AM, Keeley P, Woby S, McGowan L. Testing a newly developed activity pacing framework for chronic pain/fatigue: a feasibility study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045398. [PMID: 34880007 PMCID: PMC8655535 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To test the feasibility of using a new activity pacing framework to standardise healthcare professionals' instructions of pacing, and explore whether measures of activity pacing/symptoms detected changes following treatment. DESIGN Single-arm, repeated measures study. SETTING One National Health Service (NHS) Pain Service in Northern England, UK. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients with chronic pain/fatigue, including chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. INTERVENTIONS Six-week rehabilitation programme, standardised using the activity pacing framework. OUTCOME MEASURES Feasibility was explored via patients' recruitment/attrition rates, adherence and satisfaction, and healthcare professionals' fidelity. Questionnaire data were collected from patients at the start and end of the programme (T1 and T2, respectively) and 3 months' follow-up (T3). Questionnaires included measures of activity pacing, current/usual pain, physical/mental fatigue, depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, avoidance, physical/mental function and quality of life. Mean changes in activity pacing and symptoms between T1-T2, T2-T3 and T1-T3 were estimated. RESULTS Of the 139 eligible patients, 107 patients consented (recruitment rate=77%); 65 patients completed T2 (T1-T2 attrition rate=39%), and 52 patients completed T3 (T1-T3 attrition rate=51%). At T2, patients' satisfaction ratings averaged 9/10, and 89% attended ≥5 rehabilitation programme sessions. Activity pacing and all symptoms improved between T1 and T2, with smaller improvements maintained at T3. CONCLUSION The activity pacing framework was feasible to implement and patients' ability to pace and manage their symptoms improved. Future work will employ a suitable comparison group and test the framework across wider settings to explore the effects of activity pacing in a randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03497585.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Antcliff
- Department of Physiotherapy, Fairfield General Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK
| | - Philip Keeley
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Steve Woby
- Department of Research and Innovation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Salford, UK
- School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK
| | - Linda McGowan
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yeoh SA, Burke B, Castelino M, Hyndman T, Keenan AM, Watson S, Coates LC. Patient and public involvement in rheumatology research: embracing the wave of change. Lancet Rheumatol 2021; 3:e540-e542. [PMID: 38287615 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00184-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Su-Ann Yeoh
- Department of Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Barbara Burke
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Tracy Hyndman
- Department of Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sue Watson
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Laura C Coates
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Over the past decade, the role of nurses, midwives and allied health professionals (NMAHPs) have been transformed within the UK research community. Assisted by new funding opportunities and a recognition of their role in interdisciplinary working, NMAHPs are driving innovative patient care. Challenges still remain to maximise the potential of NHAMPs in clinical research; signposting opportunities to become involved in research, promoting clear career pathways and developing innovative roles with the NHS to attract and retain this community are critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Jones
- University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Antcliff D, Keenan AM, Keeley P, Woby S, McGowan L. "Pacing does help you get your life back": The acceptability of a newly developed activity pacing framework for chronic pain/fatigue. Musculoskeletal Care 2021; 20:99-110. [PMID: 33955642 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We have developed and feasibility tested an activity pacing framework for clinicians to standardise their recommendations of activity pacing to patients with chronic pain/fatigue. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and fidelity to this framework in preparation for a future trial of activity pacing. DESIGN Acceptability and fidelity were explored using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using framework analysis. PARTICIPANTS Patients who attended a rehabilitation programme for chronic pain/fatigue underpinned by the framework, and clinicians (physiotherapists and psychological wellbeing practitioners) who led the programmes. RESULTS Seventeen interviews were conducted, involving 12 patients with chronic pain/fatigue and five clinicians. The framework analysis revealed four deductive themes: (1) Acceptability of the activity pacing framework, (2) Acceptability of the feasibility study methods, (3) Processes of change and (4) Barriers and facilitators to activity pacing; and one inductive theme: (5) Perspectives of patients and clinicians. CONCLUSIONS The activity pacing framework appeared acceptable to patients and clinicians, and adherence to the framework was demonstrated. Processes of behaviour change included patients' regulation of activities through activity pacing. Barriers to pacing included work/social commitments and facilitators included identifying the benefits of pacing on symptoms. Different perspectives emerged between clinicians and patients regarding interpretations of symptom-contingent and quota-contingent strategies. The framework recognises fluctuations in symptoms of chronic pain/fatigue and encourages a quota-contingent approach with flexibility. Future work will develop a patient friendly guide ahead of a clinical trial to explore the effects of pacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Antcliff
- Physiotherapy Department, Bury Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, England, UK.,School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.,NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Philip Keeley
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Keele University, Keele, England, UK
| | - Steve Woby
- Research and Innovation Department, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Salford, England, UK.,School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, England, UK.,Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Linda McGowan
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mebrahtu TF, Bloor K, Ledward A, Keenan AM, Andre D, Randell R, Skyrme S, Yang H, King H, Thompson CA. Effects of computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen Bloor
- Department of Health Sciences; University of York; York UK
| | | | | | - Deirdre Andre
- University of Leeds Library; University of Leeds; Leeds UK
| | - Rebecca Randell
- Faculty of Health Studies; University of Bradford; Bradford UK
| | - Sarah Skyrme
- School of Healthcare; University of Leeds; Leeds UK
| | - Huiqin Yang
- School of Healthcare; University of Leeds; Leeds UK
| | - Henry King
- School of Healthcare; University of Leeds; Leeds UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gierula J, Lowry JE, Paton MF, Cole CA, Byrom R, Koshy AA, Chumun H, Kearney LC, Straw S, Bowen TS, Cubbon RM, Keenan AM, Stocken DD, Kearney MT, Witte KK. Response by Gierula et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Personalized Rate-Response Programming Improves Exercise Tolerance After 6 Months in People With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Heart Failure: A Phase II Study". Circulation 2020; 142:e319-e320. [PMID: 33166218 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.120.050610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John Gierula
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Judith E Lowry
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Maria F Paton
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte A Cole
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rowenna Byrom
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron A Koshy
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Hemant Chumun
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine C Kearney
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Straw
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - T Scott Bowen
- Leeds Faculty of Biological Sciences (T.S.B.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Richard M Cubbon
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- Leeds School of Healthcare (A.- M.K.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah D Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (D.D.S.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Mark T Kearney
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Klaus K Witte
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.A.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gierula J, Lowry JE, Paton MF, Cole CA, Byrom R, Koshy AO, Chumun H, Kearney LC, Straw S, Bowen TS, Cubbon RM, Keenan AM, Stocken DD, Kearney MT, Witte KK. Personalized Rate-Response Programming Improves Exercise Tolerance After 6 Months in People With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Heart Failure. Circulation 2020; 141:1693-1703. [DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.045066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background:
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is characterized by blunting of the positive relationship between heart rate and left ventricular (LV) contractility known as the force-frequency relationship (FFR). We have previously described that tailoring the rate-response programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices in patients with HFrEF on the basis of individual noninvasive FFR data acutely improves exercise capacity. We aimed to examine whether using FFR data to tailor heart rate response in patients with HFrEF with cardiac implantable electronic devices favorably influences exercise capacity and LV function 6 months later.
Methods:
We conducted a single-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial in patients with stable symptomatic HFrEF taking optimal guideline-directed medical therapy and with a cardiac implantable electronic device (cardiac resynchronization therapy or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator). Participants were randomized on a 1:1 basis between tailored rate-response programming on the basis of individual FFR data and conventional age-guided rate-response programming. The primary outcome measure was change in walk time on a treadmill walk test. Secondary outcomes included changes in LV systolic function, peak oxygen consumption, and quality of life.
Results:
We randomized 83 patients with a mean±SD age 74.6±8.7 years and LV ejection fraction 35.2±10.5. Mean change in exercise time at 6 months was 75.4 (95% CI, 23.4 to 127.5) seconds for FFR-guided rate-adaptive pacing and 3.1 (95% CI, −44.1 to 50.3) seconds for conventional settings (analysis of covariance;
P
=0.044 between groups) despite lower peak mean±SD heart rates (98.6±19.4 versus 112.0±20.3 beats per minute). FFR-guided heart rate settings had no adverse effect on LV structure or function, whereas conventional settings were associated with a reduction in LV ejection fraction.
Conclusions:
In this phase II study, FFR-guided rate-response programming determined using a reproducible, noninvasive method appears to improve exercise time and limit changes to LV function in people with HFrEF and cardiac implantable electronic devices. Work is ongoing to confirm our findings in a multicenter setting and on longer-term clinical outcomes.
Registration:
URL:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov
; Unique identifier: NCT02964650.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Gierula
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Judith E. Lowry
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Maria F. Paton
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte A. Cole
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rowenna Byrom
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron O. Koshy
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Hemant Chumun
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine C. Kearney
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Straw
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - T. Scott Bowen
- Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of Medicine (T.S.B.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Richard M. Cubbon
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Deborah D. Stocken
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (D.D.S), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Mark T. Kearney
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Klaus K. Witte
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (J.G., J.E.L., M.F.P., C.A.C., R.B., A.O.K., H.C., L.C.K., S.S., R.M.C., M.T.K., K.K.W.), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Arnold JB, Halstead J, Grainger AJ, Keenan AM, Hill CL, Redmond AC. Foot and Leg Muscle Weakness in People With Midfoot Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 73:772-780. [PMID: 32170831 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare foot and leg muscle strength in people with symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) with asymptomatic controls, and to determine the association between muscle strength, foot pain, and disability. METHODS Participants with symptomatic midfoot OA and asymptomatic controls were recruited for this cross-sectional study from general practices and community health clinics. The maximum isometric muscle strength of the ankle plantarflexors, dorsiflexors, invertors and evertors, and the hallux and lesser toe plantarflexors was measured using hand-held dynamometry. Self-reported foot pain and foot-related disability were assessed with the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index. Differences in muscle strength were compared between groups. Multivariable regression was used to determine the association between muscle strength, foot pain, and disability after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS People with midfoot OA (n = 52) exhibited strength deficits in all muscle groups, ranging from 19% (dorsiflexors) to 30% (invertors) relative to the control group (n = 36), with effect sizes of 0.6-1.1 (P < 0.001). In those with midfoot OA, ankle invertor muscle strength was negatively and independently associated with foot pain (β = -0.026 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.051, -0.001]; P = 0.045). Invertor muscle strength was negatively associated with foot-related disability, although not after adjustment for depressive symptoms (β = -0.023 [95% CI -0.063, 0.017]; P = 0.250). CONCLUSION People with symptomatic midfoot OA demonstrate weakness in the foot and leg muscles compared to asymptomatic controls. Preliminary indications from this study suggest that strengthening of the foot and leg muscles may offer potential to reduce pain and improve function in people with midfoot OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John B Arnold
- University of Leeds, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Jill Halstead
- University of Leeds, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, and Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew J Grainger
- University of Leeds, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- University of Leeds, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine L Hill
- The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Anthony C Redmond
- University of Leeds, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Antcliff D, Keenan AM, Keeley P, Woby S, McGowan L. Engaging stakeholders to refine an activity pacing framework for chronic pain/fatigue: A nominal group technique. Musculoskeletal Care 2019; 17:354-362. [PMID: 31750627 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Due to the current absence of a standardized guide for activity pacing, the concept of pacing is interpreted in various ways by healthcare professionals, patients and researchers. Consequently, the effects of pacing across different conditions are unclear. The present study aimed to undertake the second stage in the development of an activity pacing framework for chronic pain/fatigue. METHODS The newly developed activity pacing framework was refined using a consensus method. A nominal group technique (NGT) was selected to engage stakeholders to reach agreement on the top 10 priorities for inclusion in the framework and accompanying appendices. Participants included patients with diagnoses of chronic pain/fatigue and healthcare professionals working in fields of chronic pain/fatigue. RESULTS Ten participants were recruited via purposive sampling: four patients, two physiotherapists, two occupational therapists and two psychological wellbeing practitioners. The top priorities for the pacing framework included a clear definition of pacing, and stating the aims and context of pacing. The appendices were refined as a teaching guide, including priorities of detailing the stages of pacing, the overactivity-underactivity cycle/pain cycle and goal setting. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating a diverse panel of stakeholders was an effective and inclusive method to refine the activity pacing framework. The framework has been purposefully designed for wider use across patients with chronic pain/fatigue and by various healthcare professionals. The framework provides a comprehensive definition, background and manual for healthcare professionals to instruct activity pacing. Further study will test the clinical usability of the framework, to enable the standardization of activity pacing in future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Antcliff
- Physiotherapy Department, Bury and Rochdale Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK.,School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Philip Keeley
- School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Steve Woby
- Research and Innovation Department, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK.,School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.,Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda McGowan
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Keenan AM, Drake C, Conaghan PG, Tennant A. The prevalence and impact of self-reported foot and ankle pain in the over 55 age group: a secondary data analysis from a large community sample. J Foot Ankle Res 2019; 12:53. [PMID: 31788030 PMCID: PMC6858640 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-019-0363-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While the prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal problems are high, most attention has been directed towards the back, knee and hip disorders. Foot pain is known to be common in older adults and accounts for a significant burden on health services. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of foot and ankle joint pain, considering age, presence of co-morbidities and other site joint pain, in a large community sample. Methods In the North Yorkshire Health study, 16,222 people over 55 years participated in a detailed survey of the prevalence and impact of lower limb joint problems. Self-assessment of overall body pain and functional activities of daily living were assessed. Participants indicated the presence of joint pain, stiffness or swelling during the last 3 months which had lasted for more than 6 weeks on a manikin: data were captured on the foot and the ankle. Results The prevalence of self-reported foot and ankle joint pain was substantial: 184.33 per 1000, second only to knee problems. While foot pain was common, it was mostly associated with joint pain at other sites; only 1 in 11 of those with foot and ankle pain reported it only in the foot. Logistic regression modeling revealed while established factors such as co-morbidities, knee and hip problems contributed to functional impairment, foot and ankle problems contributed to an additional increased risk of having difficulty standing and walking by two fold (OR = 2.314, 95%CI 2.061–2.598), going up and down stairs by 71% (OR = 1.711, 95%CI 1.478–1.980) and getting up from a seated position by 44% (OR = 1.438, 95%CI 1.197–1.729). Conclusion These results suggest that not only are foot problems in the over 55 age group extremely prevalent, they have a considerable impact on functional abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Maree Keenan
- 1NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
| | - Chris Drake
- 2Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, England
| | - Philip G Conaghan
- 3Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
| | - Alan Tennant
- 4Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Antcliff D, Keenan AM, Keeley P, Woby S, McGowan L. Survey of activity pacing across healthcare professionals informs a new activity pacing framework for chronic pain/fatigue. Musculoskeletal Care 2019; 17:335-345. [PMID: 31430038 PMCID: PMC6973284 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Activity pacing is considered a key component of rehabilitation programmes for chronic pain/fatigue. However, there are no widely used guidelines to standardize how pacing is delivered. This study aimed to undertake the first stage in developing a comprehensive evidence-based activity pacing framework. METHODS An online survey across pain/fatigue services in English National Health Service trusts explored healthcare professionals' opinions on the types/uses of pacing, aims, facets and perceived effects. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics for closed-ended questions and thematic analysis for open-ended questions. Purposeful recruitment with a snowball effect engaged 92 healthcare professionals (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nurses, doctors and psychologists) to the study. RESULTS Pacing was highly utilized, with perceived long-term benefits for patients (n = 83, 90.2% healthcare professionals instructed pacing). The most endorsed aim of pacing was "achievement of meaningful activities" (24.5% of ranked votes). The least endorsed aim was "to conserve energy" (0.1% of ranked votes). The most frequently supported facet of pacing was "breaking down tasks" (n = 91, 98.9%). The least supported facet was "stopping activities when symptoms increase" (n = 6, 6.5%). Thematic analysis showed recurring themes that pacing involved flexibility and sense of choice. CONCLUSIONS Pacing is a multidimensional coping strategy and complex behaviour. The message is clear that pacing should enable increases in meaningful activities, as opposed to attempting to avoid symptoms. The survey findings have informed the development of an activity pacing framework to guide healthcare professionals on the multiple components of pacing. This will help to standardize and optimize treatments for chronic pain/fatigue and enable future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Antcliff
- Physiotherapy Department, Bury and Rochdale Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Bury, UK.,School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Philip Keeley
- School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Steve Woby
- Research and Innovation Department, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Salford, UK.,School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.,Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda McGowan
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chapman LS, Redmond AC, Landorf KB, Rome K, Keenan AM, Waxman R, Alcacer-Pitarch B, Siddle HJ, Backhouse MR. Foot orthoses for people with rheumatoid arthritis: a survey of prescription habits among podiatrists. J Foot Ankle Res 2019; 12:7. [PMID: 30700994 PMCID: PMC6347791 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-019-0314-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines recommend foot orthoses for people with both early (< 2 years) and established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While prefabricated foot orthoses are cheaper and can exhibit comparable effects to customised devices, the available evidence for their effectiveness is inconsistent. Little is known about what types of foot orthoses clinicians prescribe. This study describes the foot orthoses prescription habits of podiatrists for people with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods One hundred and eighty-three podiatrists from the United Kingdom (UK) (n = 88), Australia (n = 68) and New Zealand (n = 27) completed a self-administered, online survey regarding the types of foot orthoses prescribed in clinical practice for people with RA. This study forms part of a wider international survey exploring foot orthosis prescription habits. Results UK respondents were more likely to prescribe prefabricated orthoses for early RA (n = 47, 53%) and customised orthoses for established RA (n = 47, 53%). Respondents in Australia were more likely to prescribe customised orthoses for both early (n = 32, 47%) and established (n = 46, 68%) RA, whilst respondents in New Zealand were more likely to prescribe prefabricated orthoses for both early (n = 16, 59%) and established (n = 10, 37%) disease. Irrespective of disease stage, the use of foam impression boxes was more prevalent in the UK and New Zealand when capturing a model of the feet prior to manufacturing customised orthoses. In contrast, electronic scanning and plaster of Paris were more common in Australia. Computer aided manufacture was utilised more frequently among respondents in Australia than in the UK and New Zealand. Respondents in all three countries specified more flexible shell materials for established RA, compared to early disease. Cushioning top covers (e.g. PORON® or polyurethane) were most frequently specified in all countries for both disease stages. Conclusions Considerable variation was seen in the self-reported foot orthoses prescription habits of respondents for people with RA. Variation between countries and disease stage was seen in type of orthoses, specific brands, manufacturing methods, and materials prescribed. The results allow podiatrists and broader health service providers to compare their practice against reported national and international patterns. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-019-0314-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara S Chapman
- 1Department of Podiatry, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate District Hospital, Lancaster Park Road, Harrogate, UK.,2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anthony C Redmond
- 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Karl B Landorf
- 4Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,5La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Keith Rome
- 6Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute and School of Podiatry, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- 3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.,7School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robin Waxman
- 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch
- 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Heidi J Siddle
- 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael R Backhouse
- 8York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chapman LS, Redmond AC, Landorf KB, Rome K, Keenan AM, Waxman R, Alcacer-Pitarch B, Siddle HJ, Backhouse MR. A survey of foot orthoses prescription habits amongst podiatrists in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. J Foot Ankle Res 2018; 11:64. [PMID: 30505351 PMCID: PMC6258496 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-018-0304-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Foot orthoses are frequently used but little is known about which types are used in contemporary practice. This study aimed to explore the types of foot orthoses currently used by podiatrists and the prescription variations in a range of conditions. Methods A web-based, cross-sectional survey was distributed through professional bodies in the United Kingdom (UK), Australia, and New Zealand. Questions focussed on foot orthosis prescription habits in relation to 26 conditions affecting the back and lower limb. Results Two hundred and sixty-four podiatrists practising in 19 different countries completed the survey; the majority practised in the UK (47%, n = 124), Australia (30%, n = 79) and New Zealand (12%, n = 32). Respondents qualified between 1968 and 2016, and 147 (56%) were female. Respondents worked in different healthcare sectors and this varied between countries: 42 (34%) respondents in the UK worked solely in the public sector, compared to 3 (4%) in Australia and 2 (6%) in New Zealand. Forty-four (35%) respondents in the UK worked solely in private practice, compared to 64 (81%) in Australia and 14 (44%) in New Zealand. UK respondents prescribed more prefabricated orthoses per week (mean 5.5 pairs) than simple insole-type devices (±2.7) and customised devices (±2.9). Similarly, respondents in New Zealand prescribed more prefabricated orthoses per week (±7.7) than simple (±1.4) and customised (±2.8) devices. In contrast, those in Australia prescribed more customised orthoses per week (±4.4) than simple (±0.8) and prefabricated (±1.9) orthoses. Differences in the types of orthoses prescribed were observed between country of practice, working sector, and the condition targeted. Generally, prefabricated orthoses were commonly prescribed for the 26 highlighted conditions in the UK and New Zealand. Australian podiatrists prescribed far fewer devices overall, but when they did prescribe, they were more likely to prescribe custom devices. Respondents in all three countries were more likely to prescribe customised orthoses for people with diabetes complicated by peripheral neuropathy than for diabetes without this complication. Conclusions Foot orthosis prescription habits vary between countries. Prefabricated orthoses were frequently prescribed in the UK and New Zealand, and customised orthoses in Australia. Prescriptions for people with diabetes differed depending on the presence of neuropathy, despite a lack of robust evidence supporting these decisions. This study provides new insight into contemporary practice. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-018-0304-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara S Chapman
- 1Department of Podiatry, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate District Hospital, Lancaster Park Road, Harrogate, UK.,2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anthony C Redmond
- 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Karl B Landorf
- 4Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,5La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Keith Rome
- 6Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute and School of Podiatry, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- 3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.,7School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robin Waxman
- 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Begonya Alcacer-Pitarch
- 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Heidi J Siddle
- 2Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,3NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael R Backhouse
- 8York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cockayne S, Rodgers S, Green L, Fairhurst C, Adamson J, Scantlebury A, Corbacho B, Hewitt CE, Hicks K, Hull R, Keenan AM, Lamb SE, McIntosh C, Menz HB, Redmond A, Richardson Z, Vernon W, Watson J, Torgerson DJ. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for falls prevention in older people: a multicentre cohort randomised controlled trial (the REducing Falls with ORthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention trial). Health Technol Assess 2018. [PMID: 28621259 DOI: 10.3310/hta21240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls are a serious cause of morbidity and cost to individuals and society. Evidence suggests that foot problems and inappropriate footwear may increase the risk of falling. Podiatric interventions could help reduce falls; however, there is limited evidence regarding their clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVES To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for preventing falls in community-dwelling older people at risk of falling, relative to usual care. DESIGN A pragmatic, multicentred, cohort randomised controlled trial with an economic evaluation and qualitative study. SETTING Nine NHS trusts in the UK and one site in Ireland. PARTICIPANTS In total, 1010 participants aged ≥ 65 years were randomised (intervention, n = 493; usual care, n = 517) via a secure, remote service. Blinding was not possible. INTERVENTIONS All participants received a falls prevention leaflet and routine care from their podiatrist and general practitioner. The intervention also consisted of footwear advice, footwear provision if required, foot orthoses and foot- and ankle-strengthening exercises. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the incidence rate of falls per participant in the 12 months following randomisation. The secondary outcomes included the proportion of fallers and multiple fallers, time to first fall, fear of falling, fracture rate, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS The primary analysis consisted of 484 (98.2%) intervention and 507 (98.1%) usual-care participants. There was a non-statistically significant reduction in the incidence rate of falls in the intervention group [adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 1.05; p = 0.16]. The proportion of participants experiencing a fall was lower (50% vs. 55%, adjusted odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.00; p = 0.05). No differences were observed in key secondary outcomes. No serious, unexpected and related adverse events were reported. The intervention costs £252.17 more per participant (95% CI -£69.48 to £589.38) than usual care, was marginally more beneficial in terms of HRQoL measured via the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions [mean quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) difference 0.0129, 95% CI -0.0050 to 0.0314 QALYs] and had a 65% probability of being cost-effective at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold of £30,000 per QALY gained. The intervention was generally acceptable to podiatrists and trial participants. LIMITATIONS Owing to the difficulty in calculating a sample size for a count outcome, the sample size was based on detecting a difference in the proportion of participants experiencing at least one fall, and not the primary outcome. We are therefore unable to confirm if the trial was sufficiently powered for the primary outcome. The findings are not generalisable to patients who are not receiving podiatry care. CONCLUSIONS The intervention was safe and potentially effective. Although the primary outcome measure did not reach significance, a lower fall rate was observed in the intervention group. The reduction in the proportion of older adults who experienced a fall was of borderline statistical significance. The economic evaluation suggests that the intervention could be cost-effective. FUTURE WORK Further research could examine whether or not the intervention could be delivered in group sessions, by physiotherapists, or in high-risk patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68240461. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 24. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Cockayne
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sara Rodgers
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Lorraine Green
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Caroline Fairhurst
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Joy Adamson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Belen Corbacho
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Catherine E Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Kate Hicks
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Robin Hull
- Podiatry Department, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, Oxford, UK
| | - Caroline McIntosh
- Discipline of Podiatric Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Hylton B Menz
- School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony Redmond
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Zoe Richardson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Wesley Vernon
- Podiatry Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Judith Watson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - David J Torgerson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Halstead J, Martín-Hervás C, Hensor EMA, McGonagle D, Keenan AM, Redmond AC, Conaghan PG. Development and Reliability of a Preliminary Foot Osteoarthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score. J Rheumatol 2017; 44:1257-1264. [PMID: 28572462 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.160617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Foot osteoarthritis (OA) is very common but underinvestigated musculoskeletal condition and there is little consensus as to common magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. The aim of this study was to develop a preliminary foot OA MRI score (FOAMRIS) and evaluate its reliability. METHODS This preliminary semiquantitative score included the hindfoot, midfoot, and metatarsophalangeal joints. Joints were scored for joint space narrowing (JSN; 0-3), osteophytes (0-3), joint effusion/synovitis, and bone cysts (present/absent). Erosions and bone marrow lesions (BML) were scored (0-3) and BML were evaluated adjacent to entheses and at sub-tendon sites (present/absent). Additionally, tenosynovitis (0-3) and midfoot ligament pathology (present/absent) were scored. Reliability was evaluated in 15 people with foot pain and MRI-detected OA using 3.0T MRI multi-sequence protocols, and assessed using ICC as an overall score and per anatomical site. RESULTS Intrareader agreement (ICC) was generally good to excellent across the foot in joint features (JSN 0.90, osteophytes 0.90, effusion/synovitis 0.46, cysts 0.87), bone features (BML 0.83, erosion 0.66, BML entheses 0.66, BML sub-tendon 0.60) and soft tissue features (tenosynovitis 0.83, ligaments 0.77). Interreader agreement was lower for joint features (JSN 0.43, osteophytes 0.27, effusion/synovitis 0.02, cysts 0.48), bone features (BML 0.68, erosion 0.00, BML entheses 0.34, BML sub-tendon 0.13), and soft tissue features (tenosynovitis 0.35, ligaments 0.33). CONCLUSION This preliminary FOAMRIS demonstrated good intrareader reliability and fair interreader reliability when assessing the total feature scores. Further development is required in cohorts with a range of pathologies and to assess the psychometric measurement properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Halstead
- From the Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, and the School of Healthcare, University of Leeds; UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham/Leeds; Salford Royal Hospital UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid; Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Madrid, Spain.,J. Halstead, PhD, Visiting Research Fellow, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and Principal Podiatrist, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; C. Martín-Hervás, PhD, MD, Consultant Radiologist, Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, and Associate Professor of Radiology, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, and Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine; E.M. Hensor, PhD, Biostatistician, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; D. McGonagle, PhD, Professor of Investigative Rheumatology, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; A.M. Keenan, PhD, Professor of Allied Health Research, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre; A.C. Redmond, PhD, Professor of Clinical Biomechanics, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis; P.G. Conaghan, PhD, Professor of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis. P.G. Conaghan and A.C. Redmond contributed equally to this study
| | - Carmen Martín-Hervás
- From the Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, and the School of Healthcare, University of Leeds; UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham/Leeds; Salford Royal Hospital UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid; Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Madrid, Spain.,J. Halstead, PhD, Visiting Research Fellow, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and Principal Podiatrist, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; C. Martín-Hervás, PhD, MD, Consultant Radiologist, Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, and Associate Professor of Radiology, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, and Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine; E.M. Hensor, PhD, Biostatistician, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; D. McGonagle, PhD, Professor of Investigative Rheumatology, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; A.M. Keenan, PhD, Professor of Allied Health Research, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre; A.C. Redmond, PhD, Professor of Clinical Biomechanics, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis; P.G. Conaghan, PhD, Professor of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis. P.G. Conaghan and A.C. Redmond contributed equally to this study
| | - Elizabeth M A Hensor
- From the Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, and the School of Healthcare, University of Leeds; UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham/Leeds; Salford Royal Hospital UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid; Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Madrid, Spain.,J. Halstead, PhD, Visiting Research Fellow, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and Principal Podiatrist, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; C. Martín-Hervás, PhD, MD, Consultant Radiologist, Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, and Associate Professor of Radiology, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, and Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine; E.M. Hensor, PhD, Biostatistician, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; D. McGonagle, PhD, Professor of Investigative Rheumatology, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; A.M. Keenan, PhD, Professor of Allied Health Research, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre; A.C. Redmond, PhD, Professor of Clinical Biomechanics, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis; P.G. Conaghan, PhD, Professor of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis. P.G. Conaghan and A.C. Redmond contributed equally to this study
| | - Dennis McGonagle
- From the Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, and the School of Healthcare, University of Leeds; UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham/Leeds; Salford Royal Hospital UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid; Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Madrid, Spain.,J. Halstead, PhD, Visiting Research Fellow, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and Principal Podiatrist, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; C. Martín-Hervás, PhD, MD, Consultant Radiologist, Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, and Associate Professor of Radiology, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, and Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine; E.M. Hensor, PhD, Biostatistician, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; D. McGonagle, PhD, Professor of Investigative Rheumatology, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; A.M. Keenan, PhD, Professor of Allied Health Research, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre; A.C. Redmond, PhD, Professor of Clinical Biomechanics, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis; P.G. Conaghan, PhD, Professor of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis. P.G. Conaghan and A.C. Redmond contributed equally to this study
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- From the Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, and the School of Healthcare, University of Leeds; UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham/Leeds; Salford Royal Hospital UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid; Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Madrid, Spain.,J. Halstead, PhD, Visiting Research Fellow, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and Principal Podiatrist, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; C. Martín-Hervás, PhD, MD, Consultant Radiologist, Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, and Associate Professor of Radiology, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, and Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine; E.M. Hensor, PhD, Biostatistician, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; D. McGonagle, PhD, Professor of Investigative Rheumatology, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; A.M. Keenan, PhD, Professor of Allied Health Research, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre; A.C. Redmond, PhD, Professor of Clinical Biomechanics, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis; P.G. Conaghan, PhD, Professor of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis. P.G. Conaghan and A.C. Redmond contributed equally to this study
| | - Anthony C Redmond
- From the Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, and the School of Healthcare, University of Leeds; UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham/Leeds; Salford Royal Hospital UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid; Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Madrid, Spain. .,J. Halstead, PhD, Visiting Research Fellow, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and Principal Podiatrist, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; C. Martín-Hervás, PhD, MD, Consultant Radiologist, Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, and Associate Professor of Radiology, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, and Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine; E.M. Hensor, PhD, Biostatistician, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; D. McGonagle, PhD, Professor of Investigative Rheumatology, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; A.M. Keenan, PhD, Professor of Allied Health Research, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre; A.C. Redmond, PhD, Professor of Clinical Biomechanics, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis; P.G. Conaghan, PhD, Professor of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis. P.G. Conaghan and A.C. Redmond contributed equally to this study.
| | - Philip G Conaghan
- From the Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, and the School of Healthcare, University of Leeds; UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, Leeds; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham/Leeds; Salford Royal Hospital UK National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid; Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, Madrid, Spain.,J. Halstead, PhD, Visiting Research Fellow, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and Principal Podiatrist, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; C. Martín-Hervás, PhD, MD, Consultant Radiologist, Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, La Paz University Hospital, and Associate Professor of Radiology, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, and Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine; E.M. Hensor, PhD, Biostatistician, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; D. McGonagle, PhD, Professor of Investigative Rheumatology, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; A.M. Keenan, PhD, Professor of Allied Health Research, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre; A.C. Redmond, PhD, Professor of Clinical Biomechanics, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis; P.G. Conaghan, PhD, Professor of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, and Arthritis Research UK Experimental Osteoarthritis Treatment Centre, and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis. P.G. Conaghan and A.C. Redmond contributed equally to this study
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cockayne S, Fairhurst C, Adamson J, Hewitt C, Hull R, Hicks K, Keenan AM, Lamb SE, Green L, McIntosh C, Menz HB, Redmond AC, Rodgers S, Torgerson DJ, Vernon W, Watson J, Knapp P, Rick J, Bower P, Eldridge S, Madurasinghe VW, Graffy J. An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial. Trials 2017; 18:144. [PMID: 28351376 PMCID: PMC5370466 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Randomised controlled trials are generally regarded as the ‘gold standard’ experimental design to determine the effectiveness of an intervention. Unfortunately, many trials either fail to recruit sufficient numbers of participants, or recruitment takes longer than anticipated. The current embedded trial evaluates the effectiveness of optimised patient information sheets on recruitment of participants in a falls prevention trial. Methods A three-arm, embedded randomised methodology trial was conducted within the National Institute for Health Research-funded REducing Falls with ORthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention (REFORM) cohort randomised controlled trial. Routine National Health Service podiatry patients over the age of 65 were randomised to receive either the control patient information sheet (PIS) for the host trial or one of two optimised versions, a bespoke user-tested PIS or a template-developed PIS. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each group who went on to be randomised to the host trial. Results Six thousand and nine hundred patients were randomised 1:1:1 into the embedded trial. A total of 193 (2.8%) went on to be randomised into the main REFORM trial (control n = 62, template-developed n = 68; bespoke user-tested n = 63). Information sheet allocation did not improve recruitment to the trial (odds ratios for the three pairwise comparisons: template vs control 1.10 (95% CI 0.77–1.56, p = 0.60); user-tested vs control 1.01 (95% CI 0.71–1.45, p = 0.94); and user-tested vs template 0.92 (95% CI 0.65–1.31, p = 0.65)). Conclusions This embedded methodology trial has demonstrated limited evidence as to the benefit of using optimised information materials on recruitment and retention rates in the REFORM study. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number registry, ISRCTN68240461. Registered on 01 July 2011. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1797-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Cockayne
- Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Caroline Fairhurst
- Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Joy Adamson
- Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Robin Hull
- Podiatry Services, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate District Hospital, Lancaster Park Road, Harrogate, UK
| | - Kate Hicks
- Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute of Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Kadoorie Critical Care Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lorraine Green
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute of Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Caroline McIntosh
- School of Health Sciences, Áras Moyola, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Hylton B Menz
- Lower Extremity and Gait Studies Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, 3086, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony C Redmond
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute of Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sara Rodgers
- Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - David J Torgerson
- Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Wesley Vernon
- The School of Human & Health Sciences, Division of Podiatry, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Judith Watson
- Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences and the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Jo Rick
- Medical Research Council North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Peter Bower
- Medical Research Council North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Sandra Eldridge
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit (PCTU), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | - Vichithranie W Madurasinghe
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit (PCTU), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | - Jonathan Graffy
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Backhouse MR, Vinall-Collier KA, Redmond AC, Helliwell PS, Keenan AM. Interpreting outcome following foot surgery in people with rheumatoid arthritis. J Foot Ankle Res 2016; 9:20. [PMID: 27398097 PMCID: PMC4938997 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-016-0153-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Foot surgery is common in RA but the current lack of understanding of how patients interpret outcomes inhibits evaluation of procedures in clinical and research settings. This study aimed to explore which factors are important to people with RA when they evaluate the outcome of foot and ankle surgery. Methods and Results Semi structured interviews with 11 RA participants who had mixed experiences of foot surgery were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. Responses showed that while participants interpreted surgical outcome in respect to a multitude of factors, five major themes emerged: functional ability, participation, appearance of feet and footwear, surgeons’ opinion, and pain. Participants interpreted levels of physical function in light of other aspects of their disease, reflecting on relative change from their preoperative state more than absolute levels of ability. Appearance was important to almost all participants: physical appearance, foot shape, and footwear were closely interlinked, yet participants saw these as distinct concepts and frequently entered into a defensive repertoire, feeling the need to justify that their perception of outcome was not about cosmesis. Surgeons’ post-operative evaluation of the procedure was highly influential and made a lasting impression, irrespective of how the outcome compared to the participants’ initial goals. Whilst pain was important to almost all participants, it had the greatest impact upon them when it interfered with their ability to undertake valued activities. Conclusions People with RA interpret the outcome of foot surgery using multiple interrelated factors, particularly functional ability, appearance and surgeons’ appraisal of the procedure. While pain was often noted, this appeared less important than anticipated. These factors can help clinicians in discussing surgical options in patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-016-0153-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Backhouse
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK ; NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Karen A Vinall-Collier
- Dental Public Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK ; Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anthony C Redmond
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK ; NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Philip S Helliwell
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK ; Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK ; School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Halstead J, Keenan AM, Chapman GJ, Redmond AC. The feasibility of a modified shoe for multi-segment foot motion analysis: a preliminary study. J Foot Ankle Res 2016; 9:7. [PMID: 26913080 PMCID: PMC4765151 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-016-0138-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The majority of multi-segment kinematic foot studies have been limited to barefoot conditions, because shod conditions have the potential for confounding surface-mounted markers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a shoe modified with a webbed upper can accommodate multi-segment foot marker sets without compromising kinematic measurements under barefoot and shod conditions. Methods Thirty participants (15 controls and 15 participants with midfoot pain) underwent gait analysis in two conditions; barefoot and wearing a shoe (shod) in a random order. The shod condition employed a modified shoe (rubber plimsoll) with a webbed upper, allowing skin mounted reflective markers to be visualised through slits in the webbed material. Three dimensional foot kinematics were captured using the Oxford multi-segment foot model whilst participants walked at a self-selected speed. Results The foot pain group showed greater hindfoot eversion and less hindfoot dorsiflexion than controls in the barefoot condition and these differences were maintained when measured in the shod condition. Differences between the foot pain and control participants were also observed for walking speed in the barefoot and in the shod conditions. No significant differences between foot pain and control groups were demonstrated at the forefoot in either condition. Conclusions Subtle differences between pain and control groups, which were found during barefoot walking are retained when wearing the modified shoe. The novel properties of the modified shoe offers a potential solution for the use of passive infrared based motion analysis for shod applications, for instance to investigate the kinematic effect of foot orthoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Halstead
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK
| | - A M Keenan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK ; NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK ; Arthritis Research UK Experimental Arthritis Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - G J Chapman
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK ; NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK ; Arthritis Research UK Experimental Arthritis Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - A C Redmond
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK ; NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK ; Arthritis Research UK Experimental Arthritis Centre, Leeds, UK ; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham, UK ; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Oxford, UK ; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Loughborough, UK ; Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cockayne S, Adamson J, Bower P, Corbacho B, Fairhurst C, Farndon L, Hicks K, Keenan AM, Knapp P, Lamb S, Loughrey L, McIntosh C, Menz H, Redmond A, Rick J, Rodgers S, Vernon W, Watson J, Torgerson D. The reform patient information sheet sub study - an embedded trial evaluating the enhancement of patient information sheets to improve recruitment. Trials 2015. [PMCID: PMC4660066 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-16-s2-p87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
25
|
Cockayne S, Adamson J, Corbacho B, Fairhurst C, Farndon L, Hicks K, Keenan AM, Lamb S, Loughrey L, McIntosh C, Menz H, Redmond A, Rodgers S, Vernon W, Watson J, Torgerson D. The reform study: a case study of embedded trials. Trials 2015. [PMCID: PMC4660340 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-16-s2-p174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
26
|
Halstead J, Chapman GJ, Gray JC, Grainger AJ, Brown S, Wilkins RA, Roddy E, Helliwell PS, Keenan AM, Redmond AC. Foot orthoses in the treatment of symptomatic midfoot osteoarthritis using clinical and biomechanical outcomes: a randomised feasibility study. Clin Rheumatol 2015; 35:987-96. [PMID: 25917211 PMCID: PMC4819552 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-015-2946-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2015] [Revised: 04/12/2015] [Accepted: 04/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This randomised feasibility study aimed to examine the clinical and biomechanical effects of functional foot orthoses (FFOs) in the treatment of midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) and the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial. Participants with painful, radiographically confirmed midfoot OA were recruited and randomised to receive either FFOs or a sham control orthosis. Feasibility measures included recruitment and attrition rates, practicality of blinding and adherence rates. Clinical outcome measures were: change from baseline to 12 weeks for severity of pain (numerical rating scale), foot function (Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index) and patient global impression of change scale. To investigate the biomechanical effect of foot orthoses, in-shoe foot kinematics and plantar pressures were evaluated at 12 weeks. Of the 119 participants screened, 37 were randomised and 33 completed the study (FFO = 18, sham = 15). Compliance with foot orthoses and blinding of the intervention was achieved in three quarters of the group. Both groups reported improvements in pain, function and global impression of change; the FFO group reporting greater improvements compared to the sham group. The biomechanical outcomes indicated the FFO group inverted the hindfoot and increased midfoot maximum plantar force compared to the sham group. The present findings suggest FFOs worn over 12 weeks may provide detectable clinical and biomechanical benefits compared to sham orthoses. This feasibility study provides useful clinical, biomechanical and statistical information for the design and implementation of a definitive randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of FFOs in treating painful midfoot OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Halstead
- Section of Clinical Biomechanics and Physical Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
| | - Graham J Chapman
- Section of Clinical Biomechanics and Physical Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.,Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Experimental Arthritis Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Janine C Gray
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew J Grainger
- Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK.,Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard A Wilkins
- Section of Clinical Biomechanics and Physical Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK
| | - Edward Roddy
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Philip S Helliwell
- Section of Clinical Biomechanics and Physical Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- Section of Clinical Biomechanics and Physical Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.,Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Anthony C Redmond
- Section of Clinical Biomechanics and Physical Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.,Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Experimental Arthritis Centre, Leeds, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sports, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nottingham, Oxford, Loughborough, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Navarro Coy NC, Brown S, Bosworth A, Davies CT, Emery P, Everett CC, Fernandez C, Gray JC, Hartley S, Hulme C, Keenan AM, McCabe C, Redmond A, Reynolds C, Scott D, Sharples LD, Pavitt S, Buch MH. The 'Switch' study protocol: a randomised-controlled trial of switching to an alternative tumour-necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitor drug or abatacept or rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have failed an initial TNF-inhibitor drug. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15:452. [PMID: 25539805 PMCID: PMC4391115 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2014] [Accepted: 12/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is one of the most common autoimmune diseases, affecting approximately 1% of the UK adult population. Patients suffer considerable pain, stiffness and swelling and can sustain various degrees of joint destruction, deformity, and significant functional decline. In addition, the economic burden due to hospitalisation and loss of employment is considerable, with over 50% of patients being work-disabled within 10 years of diagnosis. Despite several biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) now available, there is a lack of data to guide biologic sequencing. In the UK, second-line biologic treatment is restricted to a single option, rituximab. The aim of the SWITCH trial is to establish whether an alternative-mechanism-TNF-inhibitor (TNFi) or abatacept are as effective as rituximab in patients with RA who have failed an initial TNFi drug. METHODS/DESIGN SWITCH is a pragmatic, phase IV, multi-centre, parallel-group design, open-label, randomised, controlled trial (RCT) comparing alternative-mechanism-TNFi and abatacept with rituximab in patients with RA who have failed an initial TNFi drug. Participants are randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive alternative mechanism TNFi, (monoclonal antibodies: infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab or golimumab or the receptor fusion protein, etanercept), abatacept or rituximab during the interventional phase (from randomisation up to week 48). Participants are subsequently followed up to a maximum of 96 weeks, which constitutes the observational phase. The primary objective is to establish whether an alternative-mechanism-TNFi or abatacept are non-inferior to rituximab in terms of disease response at 24 weeks post randomisation. The secondary objectives include the comparison of alternative-mechanism-TNFi and abatacept to rituximab in terms of disease response, quality of life, toxicity, safety and structural and bone density outcomes over a 12-month period (48 weeks) and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of switching patients to alternative active therapies compared to current practice. DISCUSSION SWITCH is a well-designed trial in this therapeutic area that aims to develop a rational treatment algorithm to potentially inform personalised treatment regimens (as opposed to switching all patients to only one available (and possibly unsuccessful) therapy), which may lead to long-term improved patient outcomes and gains in population health. TRIAL REGISTRATION UKCRN Portfolio ID: 12343; ISRCTN89222125 ; NCT01295151.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria C Navarro Coy
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
| | - Sarah Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Ailsa Bosworth
- National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS), Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 3RT, UK.
| | - Claire T Davies
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
| | - Colin C Everett
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Catherine Fernandez
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Janine C Gray
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Suzanne Hartley
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Claire Hulme
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK.
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
| | | | - Anthony Redmond
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
| | - Catherine Reynolds
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - David Scott
- School of Medicine, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, NR4 7QN, UK.
| | - Linda D Sharples
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Sue Pavitt
- Centre for Health Sciences Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK.
| | - Maya H Buch
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Stoffer MA, Smolen JS, Woolf A, Ambrozic A, Berghea F, Boonen A, Bosworth A, Carmona L, Dougados M, de Wit M, Erwin J, Fialka-Moser V, Ionescu R, Keenan AM, Loza E, Moe RH, Greiff R, Olejnik P, Petersson IF, Rat AC, Rozman B, Strömbeck B, Tanner L, Uhlig T, Vlieland TPMV, Stamm TA. Development of patient-centred standards of care for osteoarthritis in Europe: the eumusc.net-project. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 74:1145-9. [PMID: 25416720 PMCID: PMC4431331 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2014] [Accepted: 09/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Objective The eumusc.net project is an initiative founded by the European Community and the European League Against Rheumatism. One aim of the project was to facilitate equal standards for musculoskeletal health across Europe. The aim of this work-package was to develop patient-centred and consensus based standards of care (SOC) for osteoarthritis (OA), which should be available in a professional and a patient version. Methods A systematic review concerning guidelines dealing with OA was conducted. Furthermore, experts in musculoskeletal diseases were contacted to ensure that ‘grey’ literature was not excluded. Documents that fulfilled predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria were included and all interventions for OA were extracted and categorised. Based on this list of interventions, a three round Delphi exercise with an international and multidisciplinary expert panel, including patient research partners, was performed to achieve expert consensus. Results Six documents were included and used for further analysis. Out of them, 46 interventions have been extracted and 10 consensus based SOC were formulated. In addition, a patient version, written in a lay-understandable wording and in the format of checklist questions was developed. An example is SOC 5: “People with OA should achieve optimal pain control using pharmacological and non-pharmacological means.” The matching patient-centred checklist question reads: “Do I know how to control pain associated with OA?” Conclusions The SOC for OA will be available in the 23 languages of the European Union to enhance unified information to patients and professionals and to further harmonise the treatment/care of OA within Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela A Stoffer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Ales Ambrozic
- University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Florian Berghea
- Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Maxime Dougados
- Paris Descartes University, Paris, France Department of Rheumatology-Hôpital Cochin. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France INSERM (U1153): Clinical Epidemiology and biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Veronika Fialka-Moser
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ruxandra Ionescu
- Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anne-Maree Keenan
- University of Leeds and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Rikke H Moe
- National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology (NKRR), Oslo, Norway
| | - Rolf Greiff
- Rheumatikerförbundet, Swedish Rheumatism Association, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Ingemar F Petersson
- Orthopedics and Rheumatology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anne-Christine Rat
- Université de Lorraine, Université Paris Descartes, Apemac, EA 4360, Nancy, France
| | - Blaz Rozman
- University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Britta Strömbeck
- Orthopedics and Rheumatology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Till Uhlig
- National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology (NKRR), Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Tanja A Stamm
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Halstead J, Gray J, Chapman GJ, Grainger A, Brown S, Wilkins R, Helliwell P, Roddy E, Keenan AM, Redmond AC. 179. Foot Orthoses in the Treatment of Symptomatic Midfoot Osteoarthritis Using Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes: A Feasibility Study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu107.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
31
|
Cockayne S, Adamson J, Hewitt C, Hull R, Keenan AM, Redmond A, Lamb S, McIntosh C, Menz H, Vernon W, Watson J, Torgerson D. The reform study: a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial. Trials 2013. [PMCID: PMC3980330 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-s1-o44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
32
|
Nam JL, Villeneuve E, Hensor EMA, Conaghan PG, Keen HI, Buch MH, Gough AK, Green MJ, Helliwell PS, Keenan AM, Morgan AW, Quinn M, Reece R, van der Heijde DM, Wakefield RJ, Emery P. Remission induction comparing infliximab and high-dose intravenous steroid, followed by treat-to-target: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial in new-onset, treatment-naive, rheumatoid arthritis (the IDEA study). Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 73:75-85. [PMID: 23912798 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to compare the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) and infliximab (IFX) with MTX and intravenous corticosteroid for remission induction. METHODS In a 78-week multicentre randomised controlled trial, double-blinded to week 26, 112 treatment-naive RA patients (1987 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria) with disease activity score 44 (DAS44)>2.4 were randomised to MTX + IFX or MTX + single dose intravenous methylprednisolone 250 mg. A treat-to-target approach was used with treatment escalation if DAS44>2.4. In the IFX group, IFX was discontinued for sustained remission (DAS44<1.6 for 6 months). The primary outcome was change in modified total Sharp-van der Heijde score (mTSS) at week 50. RESULTS The mean changes in mTSS score at week 50 in the IFX and intravenous steroid groups were 1.20 units and 2.81 units, respectively (adjusted difference (95% CI) -1.45 (-3.35 to 0.45); p=0.132). Radiographic non-progression (mTSS<2.0) occurred in 81% vs 71% (OR 1.77 (0.56 to 5.61); p=0.328). DAS44 remission was achieved at week 50 in 49% and 36% (OR 2.13 (0.91 to 5.00); p=0.082), and at week 78 in 48% and 50% (OR 1.12 (0.47 to 2.68); p=0.792). Exploratory analyses suggested higher DAS28 remission at week 6 and less ultrasound synovitis at week 50 in the IFX group. Of the IFX group, 25% (14/55) achieved sustained remission and stopped IFX. No substantive differences in adverse events were seen. CONCLUSIONS In DMARD-naive early RA patients, initial therapy with MTX+high-dose intravenous steroid resulted in good disease control with little structural damage. MTX+IFX was not statistically superior to MTX+intravenous steroid when combined with a treat-to-target approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Nam
- Institute Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, LTHT, , Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Backhouse MR, Hensor EMA, White D, Keenan AM, Helliwell PS, Redmond AC. Concurrent validation of activity monitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2013; 28:473-9. [PMID: 23522723 PMCID: PMC3677088 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2012] [Revised: 02/08/2013] [Accepted: 02/27/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity is frequently reported in rheumatology but it is difficult to measure objectively outside the gait laboratory. A new generation of activity monitors offers this potential but it has not yet been evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This study aimed to evaluate three types of activity monitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS The Step-N-Tune, Activ4Life Pro V3.8, and the Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Activity activity monitors were tested concurrently in 12 patients with rheumatoid arthritis as well as in a healthy control group of 12 volunteers. Participants walked at a self selected speed for two minutes and were filmed for later review. Temporal and spatial gait parameters were also validated against the GAITRite walkway and the total number of steps recorded by each activity monitor was compared to a gold standard derived from half speed video replays. FINDINGS Activity monitor performance varied between devices but all showed poorer performance when used in the group with rheumatoid arthritis. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated wider 95% limits of agreement in the group with rheumatoid arthritis and a systematic decrease in agreement between activity monitors and the gold standard with decreasing functional ability. INTERPRETATION Despite some variation between devices, all the activity monitors tested performed reasonably well in healthy young volunteers. All except the Activ4Life showed a marked decrease in performance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting Activ4Life could be the most suitable for use in this patient group. The marked between group difference in functional ability, and systematic decrease in device performance with deteriorating gait, indicate that activity monitors require specific validation in target clinical populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Backhouse
- Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Backhouse MR, Keenan AM, Hensor EMA, Young A, James D, Dixey J, Williams P, Prouse P, Gough A, Helliwell PS, Redmond AC. Use of conservative and surgical foot care in an inception cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011; 50:1586-95. [PMID: 21504991 PMCID: PMC3157630 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives. To describe conservative and surgical foot care in patients with RA in England and explore factors that predict the type of foot care received. Methods. Use of podiatry and type of foot surgery were outcomes recorded in an inception cohort involving nine rheumatology centres that recruited patients with RA between 1986 and 1998 across England. Associations between patient-specific factors and service use were identified using univariate logistic regression analyses. The independence of these associations was then verified through multiple binary logistic regression modelling. Results. Data were collected on 1237 patients with RA [66.9% females, mean (s.d.) age at disease onset = 54.36 (14.18) years, median DAS = 4.09 (1st quartile = 3.04, 3rd quartile = 5.26), median HAQ = 1 (0.50, 1.63)]. Interventions involving the feet in the cohort were low with only 364 (30%) out of 1218 receiving podiatry and 47 (4%) out of 1237 patients having surgery. At baseline, female gender, increasing age at onset, being RF positive and higher DAS scores were each independently associated with increased odds of seeing a podiatrist. Gender, age of onset and baseline DAS were independently associated with the odds of having foot surgery. Conclusions. Despite the known high prevalence of foot pathologies in RA, only one-third of this cohort accessed podiatry. While older females were more likely to access podiatry care and younger patients surgery, the majority of the RA population did not access any foot care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Backhouse
- Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Welsh BJ, Redmond AC, Chockalingam N, Keenan AM. A case-series study to explore the efficacy of foot orthoses in treating first metatarsophalangeal joint pain. J Foot Ankle Res 2010; 3:17. [PMID: 20799935 PMCID: PMC2939594 DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2009] [Accepted: 08/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint pain is a common foot complaint which is often considered to be a consequence of altered mechanics. Foot orthoses are often prescribed to reduce 1st MTP joint pain with the aim of altering dorsiflexion at propulsion. This study explores changes in 1st MTP joint pain and kinematics following the use of foot orthoses. Methods The effect of modified, pre-fabricated foot orthoses (X-line®) were evaluated in thirty-two patients with 1st MTP joint pain of mechanical origin. The primary outcome was pain measured at baseline and 24 weeks using the pain subscale of the foot function index (FFI). In a small sub-group of patients (n = 9), the relationship between pain and kinematic variables was explored with and without their orthoses, using an electromagnetic motion tracking (EMT) system. Results A significant reduction in pain was observed between baseline (median = 48 mm) and the 24 week endpoint (median = 14.50 mm, z = -4.88, p < 0.001). In the sub-group analysis, we found no relationship between pain reduction and 1st MTP joint motion, and no significant differences were found between the 1st MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion or ankle/subtalar complex maximum eversion, with and without the orthoses. Conclusions This observational study demonstrated a significant decrease in 1st MTP joint pain associated with the use of foot orthoses. Change in pain was not shown to be associated with 1st MTP joint dorsiflexion nor with altered ankle/subtalar complex eversion. Further research into the effect of foot orthoses on foot function is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Welsh
- Musculoskeletal and Rehabilitation Services, NHS Leeds Community Healthcare, St Mary's Hospital, Leeds, LS12 3QE, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Conaghan PG, Hensor EMA, Keenan AM, Morgan AW, Emery P. Persistently moderate DAS-28 is not benign: loss of function occurs in early RA despite step-up DMARD therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010; 49:1894-9. [PMID: 20542894 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Current UK management of RA initially employs conventional DMARDs, with biological therapy reserved for DMARD-resistant RA patients with persistently high 28-joint disease activity score (DAS-28). The aim of this study was to examine the effect on patient-reported function of persistently moderate DAS-28 despite modern step-up DMARD therapy in an early arthritis cohort. METHODS Data were obtained from the Yorkshire Early Arthritis Register, a cohort of early (<12 months) RA patients treated with dose-escalated DMARDs. Change in HAQ exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was determined for three values of MCID (0.22, 0.31 and 0.49). Changes in HAQ over Months 6-12 were compared between patients whose DAS-28(ESR) was persistently high (> 5.1 at 6- and/or 9-month visits and at the 12-month visit), persistently moderate (>3.2 and ≤ 5.1) or persistently low (≤ 3.2). RESULTS We selected 194 patients for this analysis. Deteriorating HAQ scores were observed in 10.9% of patients with persistently low DAS-28 compared with 21.4% (persistently moderate DAS-28) and 46.7% (persistently high DAS-28), respectively, for MCID = 0.22; 7.3, 14.3 and 20.0% for MCID = 0.31; 5.5, 10.7 and 11.1% for MCID = 0.49. CONCLUSIONS A high DAS-28 was generally associated with a greater degree of functional decline, but persistent moderate elevation of DAS-28 was associated with important functional deterioration in 10-21% of early RA patients (depending on choice of MCID) following a modern DMARD protocol. A proportion of patients with persistently moderate DAS-28 may therefore benefit from more aggressive therapy than that allowed by current UK recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip G Conaghan
- Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Halstead J, Bergin D, Keenan AM, Madden J, McGonagle D. Ligament and bone pathologic abnormalities more frequent in neuropathic joint disease in comparison with degenerative arthritis of the foot and ankle: Implications for understanding rapidly progressive joint degeneration. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 62:2353-8. [DOI: 10.1002/art.27547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
38
|
Redmond AC, Landorf KB, Keenan AM. Contoured, prefabricated foot orthoses demonstrate comparable mechanical properties to contoured, customised foot orthoses: a plantar pressure study. J Foot Ankle Res 2009; 2:20. [PMID: 19531262 PMCID: PMC2711934 DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2008] [Accepted: 06/16/2009] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Foot orthoses have been demonstrated to be effective in the management of a range of conditions, but there is debate as to the benefits of customised foot orthoses over less expensive, prefabricated devices. Methods In a randomised, cross-over trial, 15 flat-footed participants aged between 18 and 45 years were provided with semi-rigid, customised orthoses and semi-rigid, contoured, prefabricated orthoses. Pressures and forces were measured using an in-shoe system with subjects wearing shoes alone, wearing customised orthoses, and again when wearing contoured prefabricated orthoses. Two weeks acclimatisation was included between cross-over of therapy. Repeated measures ANOVA models with post-hoc, pair-wise comparisons were used to test for differences. Results When compared to wearing shoes alone, wearing either the customised orthoses or the prefabricated orthoses was associated with increases in force and force time integrals in the midfoot region. Peak and maximum mean pressure and pressure-time, and force-time integrals were reduced in both the medial and lateral forefoot. There were, however, no significant differences between the customised orthoses and the prefabricated orthoses at any site. Conclusion There was a similar change in loading with both the semi-rigid customised and the semi-rigid prefabricated orthoses when compared to the shoe alone condition. However, while customised devices offered minor differences over prefabricated orthoses in some variables, these were not statistically significant. The results suggest that there may be only minor differences in the effects on plantar pressures between the customised and the less expensive prefabricated orthoses tested in this study, however further research is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony C Redmond
- Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Harehills Lane, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pallant JF, Keenan AM, Misajon R, Conaghan PG, Tennant A. Measuring the impact and distress of osteoarthritis from the patients' perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009; 7:37. [PMID: 19400966 PMCID: PMC2683800 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2008] [Accepted: 04/29/2009] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To assess the internal construct validity of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP), a patient based outcome measure based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), which assesses impact and distress, in an osteoarthritis (OA) cohort. Methods A questionnaire comprising the 23-item PIPP, which assesses five domains (mobility, participation, self care, psychological well being and relationships), the Western Ontario McMasters University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the General Well-Being Index (GWBI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was posted to people with clinician diagnosed OA. Assessment of the internal construct validity of the PIPP was undertaken using Rasch analysis performed with RUMM2020 software and concurrent validity through comparator measures. Results Two hundred and fifty-nine participants with OA responded. Analysis of the five individual domains of the PIPP indicated that there was good fit to the Rasch model, with high person separation reliability. One item required removal from the Mobility subscale and the Participation subscale. There were strong correlations between the PIPP Mobility scores and the WOMAC disability and pain subscales (rho = .73 and rho = .68), and between the PIPP Psychological well-being and HADS Depression (rho = .71) and GWBI (rho = -.69). High inter-correlations between the impact and distress subscales for each domain (range rho = .85 to .96), suggested redundancy of the latter. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the PIPP has good psychometric properties in an OA population. The PIPP, using just the impact subscales, provides a brief, reliable and valid means of assessing the impact of OA from the individual's perspective and operationalizing the bio-psychosocial model by the application of a single multi-domain questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie F Pallant
- School of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, 49 Graham St, Shepparton, Victoria, 3630, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bejarano V, Quinn M, Conaghan PG, Reece R, Keenan AM, Walker D, Gough A, Green M, McGonagle D, Adebajo A, Jarrett S, Doherty S, Hordon L, Melsom R, Unnebrink K, Kupper H, Emery P. Effect of the early use of the anti-tumor necrosis factor adalimumab on the prevention of job loss in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008; 59:1467-74. [PMID: 18821658 DOI: 10.1002/art.24106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare work disability and job loss in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving adalimumab plus methotrexate (adalimumab + MTX) versus MTX alone. METHODS In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, patients with RA for <2 years who had never taken MTX and who self-reported work impairment were randomized to adalimumab + MTX or placebo + MTX for 56 weeks. Primary outcome was job loss of any cause and/or imminent job loss at or after week 16. Secondary outcomes included disease activity, function (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score), and RA quality of life (RAQoL) questionnaire score. Work was evaluated with work diaries and the RA Work Instability Scale. RESULTS Although job loss during the 56-week study was significantly lower with adalimumab + MTX (14 of 75 patients) compared with MTX alone (29 of 73 patients; P=0.005), the primary end point was not met (12 of 75 versus 20 of 73 patients; P=0.092), likely owing to early drop out in the MTX group. There were significant improvements in American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, DeltaHAQ, DeltaRAQoL, and working time lost in the adalimumab + MTX group. Twenty-four serious adverse events were reported in 17 participants, with no differences between groups. CONCLUSION Adalimumab + MTX reduced job loss and improved productivity in early RA when compared with MTX alone, which supports the early use of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and suggests its cost efficacy.
Collapse
|
41
|
Keenan AM, Mckenna SP, Doward LC, Conaghan PG, Emery P, Tennant A. Development and validation of a needs-based quality of life instrument for osteoarthritis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008; 59:841-8. [DOI: 10.1002/art.23714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
42
|
Iversen MD, Hill J, Keenan AM, Li LC, Hurley M, Vliet Vlieland TPM. Care in action--translating research into practice: CARE IV conference report. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 57:1334-8. [PMID: 17907145 DOI: 10.1002/art.23014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maura D Iversen
- MGH Institute of Health Professions, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02129-4557, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the internal construct validity of a clinician-assessed measure of foot position, the Foot Posture Index (FPI), versions FPI-8 and FPI-6. DESIGN Rasch analysis of baseline FPI scores from studies conducted during the development of the instrument. SETTING A community-based and a hospital-based study, conducted at 2 institutions. PARTICIPANTS Measures were obtained from 143 participants (98 men, 45 women; age range, 8-65y). INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rasch analysis was undertaken using RUMM2020 software in order to evaluate the following properties of the FPI: unidimensionality of each item included in the FPI, the differential item functioning (DIF) of each item, and item and person separation indices. RESULTS In the developmental draft of the instrument, the 8-item FPI-8 showed some misfit to the Rasch model (chi(16)(2) test=27.63, P=.03), indicating lack of unidimensionality. Two items were identified as problematic in the Rasch modeling: Achilles' tendon insertion (Helbing's sign), which showed illogical response ordering and "congruence of the lateral border of the foot," which showed misfit, indicating that this item may be measuring a different construct (chi(2)(2) test=15.35, P<.01). All FPI-8 items showed an absence of DIF, and the person separation index (PSI) was good (PSI=.88). The revised FPI-6, which does not include the 2 problematic items, showed unidimensionality (chi(12)(2) test=11.49, P=.49), indicating a good overall fit to the model, and improvement over the preliminary version. With the removal of the 2 problematic items, there were no disordered thresholds; all items remained DIF free and all individual items displayed a good fit to the model. The person-separation index for the FPI was similar for both the 8-item (FPI-8=.880) and 6-item (FPI-6=.884) versions. CONCLUSIONS The original FPI-8 showed significant mismatching to the model. The 2 items in the FPI-8 that were identified as problematic in clinical validation studies were also found to be contributing to the lack of fit to the Rasch model. The finalized 6-item instrument showed good metric properties, including good individual item fit and good overall fit to the model, along with a lack of differential item functioning. This analysis provides further evidence for the validity of the FPI-6 as a clinical instrument for use in screening studies and shows that it has the potential to be analyzed using parametric strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Maree Keenan
- Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Marzo-Ortega H, Green MJ, Keenan AM, Wakefield RJ, Proudman S, Emery P. A randomized controlled trial of early intervention with intraarticular corticosteroids followed by sulfasalazine versus conservative treatment in early oligoarthritis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 57:154-60. [PMID: 17266089 DOI: 10.1002/art.22467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the outcome after 52 weeks of early intervention with intraarticular corticosteroid injections followed by sulfasalazine versus conservative therapy in patients with recent-onset oligoarthritis in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS Patients with <or=4 joints with clinical synovitis (disease duration <or=12 months) were randomized to early intervention (EI) with intraarticular methylprednisolone into all synovitic joints or to conservative treatment (CT) with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs alone. Sulfasalazine was administered in both groups for persistent disease or disease that evolved into a polyarthritis. Primary outcome was complete response (CR) defined as the absence of synovitis at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included CR at weeks 4 and 12, function (Health Assessment Questionnaire), pain (0-100-mm visual analog scale), and work status. RESULTS Fifty-nine patients (34 men, 25 women; mean age 32.9 years; median early morning stiffness 30 minutes) were randomized. At baseline, two-thirds reported that they were work impaired. At 52 weeks, 81% of patients in the EI group achieved CR compared with 57% in the CT group (chi(2) = 3.833, 1 df, P = 0.05). In addition, 45% of patients in the EI group received sulfasalazine as opposed to 14% in the CT group (chi(2) = 5.156, 1 df, P = 0.019). There were no differences in physical disability or work impairment between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION Oligoarthritis has a significant impact on function and work ability. Patients treated with EI using intraarticular corticosteroids followed by sulfasalazine therapy if resistant demonstrated reduced synovitis 12 months after treatment compared with those initially treated with more conservative therapy.
Collapse
|
45
|
Keenan AM, Tennant A, Fear J, Emery P, Conaghan PG. Impact of multiple joint problems on daily living tasks in people in the community over age fifty-five. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 55:757-64. [PMID: 17013823 DOI: 10.1002/art.22239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish the prevalence of multiple joint problems and their impact on everyday tasks. METHODS A random sample of the UK population was assessed using a postal questionnaire. Data on overall joint pain, swelling and stiffness, and activities of daily living were obtained from 16,222 individuals >55 years of age (86% response rate). Prevalence estimates of joint problems were established and the impact of multiple joint pathologies on common physical tasks was determined. RESULTS Single joint involvement was unusual (median joint involvement 4). Although the knee was the most frequently involved joint (220.30 per 1,000), isolated knee pathology accounted for only 1 in 11 patients with knee pain. Although single joint disorders increased the risk of experiencing functional difficulty, this risk was substantially increased with multiple joint problems: individuals with knee and feet problems were 14 times more likely to experience difficulty standing and walking than those without knee problems (odds ratio [OR] 14.50); knee and hip problems increased the risk >12 times (OR 12.43) whereas knee, back, feet, and hip involvement increased the risk 60 times (OR 62.41). CONCLUSION Multiple-site joint problems are much more common than single joint problems. Although individual joint problems have a considerable impact on a person's functional ability, this risk is substantially increased when other joints are involved. With the increasing burden associated with the aging population, it is essential that the management of joint pain be considered in light of the impact of multiple, rather than single, joint problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Maree Keenan
- Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common foot complaints. It is often treated with foot orthoses; however, studies of the effects of orthoses are generally of poor quality, and to our knowledge, no trials have investigated long-term effectiveness. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of foot orthoses in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. METHODS A pragmatic, participant-blinded, randomized trial was conducted from April 1999 to July 2001. The duration of follow-up for each participant was 12 months. One hundred and thirty-five participants with plantar fasciitis from the local community were recruited to a university-based clinic and were randomly allocated to receive a sham orthosis (soft, thin foam), a prefabricated orthosis (firm foam), or a customized orthosis (semirigid plastic). RESULTS After 3 months of treatment, estimates of effects on pain and function favored the prefabricated and customized orthoses over the sham orthoses, although only the effects on function were statistically significant. Compared with sham orthoses, the mean pain score (scale, 0-100) was 8.7 points better for the prefabricated orthoses (95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 17.6; P = .05) and 7.4 points better for the customized orthoses (95% confidence interval, -1.4 to 16.2; P = .10). Compared with sham orthoses, the mean function score (scale, 0-100) was 8.4 points better for the prefabricated orthoses (95% confidence interval, 1.0-15.8; P = .03) and 7.5 points better for the customized orthoses (95% confidence interval, 0.3-14.7; P = .04). There were no significant effects on primary outcomes at the 12-month review. CONCLUSIONS Foot orthoses produce small short-term benefits in function and may also produce small reductions in pain for people with plantar fasciitis, but they do not have long-term beneficial effects compared with a sham device. The customized and prefabricated orthoses used in this trial have similar effectiveness in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl B Landorf
- Department of Podiatry, School of Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Static measurements of position of the hindfoot and clinical assessment of motion of the hindfoot often are used in the assessment of foot function and manufacturing of orthoses. However, the reliability and validity of static measurements and dynamic observation and assessment of the hindfoot are controversial. The purpose of this investigation was to examine reliability of static and dynamic assessments of the hindfoot in a setting that reproduced clinical conditions. METHODS Twenty-four healthy participants were evaluated by four experienced clinicians for four commonly used static measurements and dynamic assessment of hindfoot function. The protocol was repeated 2 weeks later. RESULTS Results indicated that reliability of results, both intertester and from test to test were poor to fair for static measurements of the hindfoot (r = 0.075 to r = 0.755, p < 0.05). The error estimates associated with these measures were high; subtalar neutral position and resting calcaneal stance position both demonstrated measurement errors of more than 4 degrees (95% confidence intervals-4.1 degrees and 5.1 degrees, respectively). Retest reliability of dynamic assessments were considered reasonable for only one clinician (kappa = 0.55). Intertester agreement was poor among all clinicians. CONCLUSION Clinicians taking static measurements demonstrated large errors that do not reflect the precision that has been assumed in clinical theory using these measurements. The availability of static assessments did not improve dynamic assessment. This poor reliability calls into question the importance placed on static and dynamic measurements of the hindfoot in clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Maree Keenan
- Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Grainger AJ, Rhodes LA, Keenan AM, Emery P, Conaghan PG. Quantifying peri-meniscal synovitis and its relationship to meniscal pathology in osteoarthritis of the knee. Eur Radiol 2006; 17:119-24. [PMID: 16685505 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0282-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2005] [Revised: 02/16/2006] [Accepted: 04/04/2006] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to validate a semiquantitative scoring system for estimating perimeniscal synovitis in osteoarthritic (OA) knees and to examine the relationship between the extent of synovitis and the degree of meniscal pathology using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Forty-three subjects with clinically diagnosed OA knee were assessed for peri-meniscal synovitis using gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Quantitative measurements of synovitis were made by summing areas in consecutive slices within generated regions of interest, and the synovitis was also scored semi-quantitatively using a 0-3 scale. Meniscal pathology (extrusion, degeneration and tearing) was also scored semiquantitatively. Establishment of a correlative relationship was undertaken using Spearman's rho (rho). A total of 86 sites were assessed. The semi-quantitative synovitis score correlated well with the quantitative synovitis score (rho>0.9). A moderate association between medial meniscal extrusion and synovitis was demonstrated (rho=0.762, P<0.000), although this association was not as strong in the lateral compartment (rho=0.524, P<0..000). The results suggest the semiquantitative scoring system is valid for assessing perimeniscal synovitis. The relationship between meniscal pathology and adjacent synovitis requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Grainger
- Department of Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Low-Dye taping is often used as a short-term treatment for plantar fasciitis. We evaluated the short-term effectiveness of low-Dye taping in relieving pain associated with plantar fasciitis. In this comparative study conducted at a university-based clinic, 65 participants with plantar fasciitis who received low-Dye taping for 3 to 5 days were compared with 40 participants who did not receive taping. Pain before and after treatment was measured using a visual analog pain scale. Analysis of the data was by the intention-to-treat principle, and a linear regression approach to analysis of covariance was used to compare effects. The visual analog pain scale score improved by a mean of 20 mm (from 44 to 24 mm) in the taping group and worsened by a mean of 6 mm (from 51 to 57 mm) in the control group. The analysis of covariance-adjusted difference in therapeutic effect favored the taping group by 31.7 mm (95% confidence interval, 23.6-39.9 mm) and was statistically significant (t = 7.71). In the short term, low-Dye taping significantly reduces the pain associated with plantar fasciitis. These findings are the first quantitative results to demonstrate the significant therapeutic effect of this treatment modality in relieving the symptoms associated with plantar fasciitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl B Landorf
- School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Penrith South DC, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Abnormal foot morphology has been suggested to contribute to overuse injuries in athletes. This study investigated the relationship between foot type and injury incidence in a large sample of competitive triathletes not wearing foot orthoses during a 6-month retrospective analysis and a 10-week prospective cohort study. Foot alignment was measured using the Foot Posture Index and the Valgus Index, and participants were assigned to supinated, pronated, and normal foot-type groups. Overall, 131 triathletes sustained 155 injuries during the study. Generally, foot type was not a major risk factor for injury; however, there was a fourfold increased risk of overuse injury during the competition season in athletes with a supinated foot type. The results of this study show that triathletes with a supinated foot type are more likely to sustain an overuse injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Burns
- School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|