Target receptor identification and subsequent treatment of resected brain tumors with encapsulated and engineered allogeneic stem cells

Cellular therapies offer a promising therapeutic strategy for the highly malignant brain tumor, glioblastoma (GBM). However, their clinical translation is limited by the lack of effective target identification and stringent testing in pre-clinical models that replicate standard treatment in GBM patients. In this study, we show the detection of cell surface death receptor (DR) target on CD146-enriched circulating tumor cells (CTC) captured from the blood of mice bearing GBM and patients diagnosed with GBM. Next, we developed allogeneic "off-the-shelf" clinical-grade bifunctional mesenchymal stem cells (MSCBif) expressing DR-targeted ligand and a safety kill switch. We show that biodegradable hydrogel encapsulated MSCBif (EnMSCBif) has a profound therapeutic efficacy in mice bearing patient-derived invasive, primary and recurrent GBM tumors following surgical resection. Activation of the kill switch enhances the efficacy of MSCBif and results in their elimination post-tumor treatment which can be tracked by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. This study establishes a foundation towards a clinical trial of EnMSCBif in primary and recurrent GBM patients.

Shattering barriers toward clinically meaningful MSC therapies

More than 1050 clinical trials are registered at FDA.gov that explore multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for nearly every clinical application imaginable, including neurodegenerative and cardiac disorders, perianal fistulas, graft-versus-host disease, COVID-19, and cancer. Several companies have or are in the process of commercializing MSC-based therapies. However, most of the clinical-stage MSC therapies have been unable to meet primary efficacy end points. The innate therapeutic functions of MSCs administered to humans are not as robust as demonstrated in preclinical studies, and in general, the translation of cell-based therapy is impaired by a myriad of steps that introduce heterogeneity. In this review, we discuss the major clinical challenges with MSC therapies, the details of these challenges, and the potential bioengineering approaches that leverage the unique biology of MSCs to overcome the challenges and achieve more potent and versatile therapies.

Bioprocess decision support tool for scalable manufacture of extracellular vesicles

Newly recognized as natural nanocarriers that deliver biological information between cells, extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes and microvesicles, provide unprecedented therapeutic opportunities. Large-scale and cost-effective manufacturing is imperative for EV products to meet commercial and clinical demands; successful translation requires careful decisions that minimize financial and technological risks. Here, we develop a decision support tool (DST) that computes the most cost-effective technologies for manufacturing EVs at different scales, by examining the costs of goods associated with using published protocols. The DST identifies costs of labor and consumables during EV harvest as key cost drivers, substantiating a need for larger-scale, higher-throughput, and automated technologies for harvesting EVs. Importantly, we highlight a lack of appropriate technologies for meeting clinical demands, and propose a potentially cost-effective solution. This DST can facilitate decision-making very early on in development and be used to predict, and better manage, the risk of process changes when commercializing EV products.

A quantitative, multi-national and multi-stakeholder assessment of barriers to the adoption of cell therapies

Cellular therapies, such as stem cell-based treatments, have been widely researched and numerous products and treatments have been developed. Despite this, there has been relatively limited use of these technologies in the healthcare sector. This study sought to investigate the perceived barriers to this more widespread adoption. An anonymous online questionnaire was developed, based on the findings of a pilot study. This was distributed to an audience of clinicians, researchers and commercial experts in 13 countries. The results were analysed for all respondents, and also sub-grouped by geographical region, and by profession of respondents. The results of the study showed that the most significant barrier was manufacturing, with other factors such as efficacy, regulation and cost-effectiveness being identified by the different groups. This study further demonstrates the need for these important issues to be addressed during the development of cellular therapies to enable more widespread adoption of these treatments.

An assessment of the factors affecting the commercialization of cell-based therapeutics: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Cellular-based therapies represent a platform technology within the rapidly expanding field of regenerative medicine and are distinct from conventional therapeutics-offering a unique approach to managing what were once considered untreatable diseases. Despite a significant increase in basic science activity within the cell therapy arena, alongside a growing portfolio of cell therapy trials and promising investment, the translation of cellular-based therapeutics from "bench to bedside" remains challenging, and the number of industry products available for widespread clinical use remains comparatively low. This systematic review identifies unique intrinsic and extrinsic barriers in the cell-based therapy domain.

METHODS/DESIGN

Eight electronic databases will be searched, specifically Medline, EMBASE (OvidSP), BIOSIS & Web of Science, Cochrane Library & HEED, EconLit (ProQuest), WHOLIS WHO Library Database, PAIS International (ProQuest), and Scopus. Addition to this gray literature was searched by manually reviewing relevant work. All identified articles will be subjected for review by two authors who will decide whether or not each article passes our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eligible papers will subsequently be reviewed, and key data extracted into a pre-designed data extraction scorecard. An assessment of the perceived impact of broad commercial barriers to the adoption of cell-based therapies will be conducted. These broad categories will include manufacturing, regulation and intellectual property, reimbursement, clinical trials, clinical adoption, ethics, and business models. This will inform further discussion in the review. There is no PROSPERO registration number.

DISCUSSION

Through a systematic search and appraisal of available literature, this review will identify key challenges in the commercialization pathway of cellular-based therapeutics and highlights significant barriers impeding successful clinical adoption. This will aid in creating an adaptable, acceptable, and harmonized approach supported by apposite regulatory frameworks and pertinent expertise throughout the respective stages of the adoption cycle to facilitate the adoption of new products and technologies in the industry.

The 3Rs of Cell Therapy

The 3Rs for a good education are “reading, 'riting, and 'rithmetic.” The basis for good health care solutions for the emergent field of cell therapy in the future will also involve 3Rs: regulation, reimbursement, and realization of value. The business models in this new field of cell therapy will involve these 3Rs. This article brings forth realities facing this new industry for its approaches to provide curative health care solutions. Stem Cells Translational Medicine2017;6:17–21

Generating iPSCs: translating cell reprogramming science into scalable and robust biomanufacturing strategies

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have the potential to transform drug discovery and healthcare in the 21(st) century. However, successful commercialization will require standardized manufacturing platforms. Here we highlight the need to define standardized practices for iPSC generation and processing and discuss current challenges to the robust manufacture of iPSC products.

Reprint of: Food reformulation and the (neo)-liberal state: new strategies for strengthening voluntary salt reduction programs in the UK and USA

Globally, excess salt intake is a significant cause of preventable heart disease and stroke, given the established links between high salt intake, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease. This paper describes and evaluates the voluntary approaches to salt reduction that operate in the United Kingdom and the United States, and proposes a new strategy for improving their performance. Drawing on developments in the theory and practice of public health governance, as well as theoretical ideas from the field of regulatory studies, this paper proposes a responsive regulatory model for managing food reformulation initiatives, including salt reduction programs. This model provides a transparent framework for guiding industry behavior, making full use of industry's willingness to participate in efforts to create healthier products, but using 'legislative scaffolding' to escalate from self-regulation towards co-regulation if industry fails to play its part in achieving national goals and targets.

Global strategic partnerships in regenerative medicine

The approach to research and development in biomedical science is changing. Increasingly, academia and industry seek to collaborate, and share resources and expertise, by establishing partnerships. Here, we explore the co-development partnership landscape in the field of regenerative medicine, focusing on agreements involving one or more private entities. A majority of the largest biopharmaceutical companies have announced strategic partnerships with a specific regenerative medicine focus, signifying the growth and widening appeal of this emerging sector.

Food reformulation and the (neo)-liberal state: new strategies for strengthening voluntary salt reduction programs in the UK and USA

Globally, excess salt intake is a significant cause of preventable heart disease and stroke, given the established links between high salt intake, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease. This paper describes and evaluates the voluntary approaches to salt reduction that operate in the United Kingdom and the United States, and proposes a new strategy for improving their performance. Drawing on developments in the theory and practice of public health governance, as well as theoretical ideas theoretical ideas from the field of regulatory studies, this paper proposes a responsive regulatory model for managing food reformulation initiatives, including salt reduction programs. This model provides a transparent framework for guiding industry behavior, making full use of industry's willingness to participate in efforts to create healthier products, but using 'legislative scaffolding' to escalate from self-regulation towards co-regulation if industry fails to play its part in achieving national goals and targets.

Enabling consistency in pluripotent stem cell-derived products for research and development and clinical applications through material standards

There is a need for physical standards (reference materials) to ensure both reproducibility and consistency in the production of somatic cell types from human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) sources. We have outlined the need for reference materials (RMs) in relation to the unique properties and concerns surrounding hPSC-derived products and suggest in-house approaches to RM generation relevant to basic research, drug screening, and therapeutic applications. hPSCs have an unparalleled potential as a source of somatic cells for drug screening, disease modeling, and therapeutic application. Undefined variation and product variability after differentiation to the lineage or cell type of interest impede efficient translation and can obscure the evaluation of clinical safety and efficacy. Moreover, in the absence of a consistent population, data generated from in vitro studies could be unreliable and irreproducible. Efforts to devise approaches and tools that facilitate improved consistency of hPSC-derived products, both as development tools and therapeutic products, will aid translation. Standards exist in both written and physical form; however, because many unknown factors persist in the field, premature written standards could inhibit rather than promote innovation and translation. We focused on the derivation of physical standard RMs. We outline the need for RMs and assess the approaches to in-house RM generation for hPSC-derived products, a critical tool for the analysis and control of product variation that can be applied by researchers and developers. We then explore potential routes for the generation of RMs, including both cellular and noncellular materials and novel methods that might provide valuable tools to measure and account for variation. Multiparametric techniques to identify "signatures" for therapeutically relevant cell types, such as neurons and cardiomyocytes that can be derived from hPSCs, would be of significant utility, although physical RMs will be required for clinical purposes.

Quantitative assessment of barriers to the clinical development and adoption of cellular therapies: A pilot study

There has been a large increase in basic science activity in cell therapy and a growing portfolio of cell therapy trials. However, the number of industry products available for widespread clinical use does not match this magnitude of activity. We hypothesize that the paucity of engagement with the clinical community is a key contributor to the lack of commercially successful cell therapy products. To investigate this, we launched a pilot study to survey clinicians from five specialities and to determine what they believe to be the most significant barriers to cellular therapy clinical development and adoption. Our study shows that the main concerns among this group are cost-effectiveness, efficacy, reimbursement, and regulation. Addressing these concerns can best be achieved by ensuring that future clinical trials are conducted to adequately answer the questions of both regulators and the broader clinical community.

The implementation of novel collaborative structures for the identification and resolution of barriers to pluripotent stem cell translation

Increased global connectivity has catalyzed technological development in almost all industries, in part through the facilitation of novel collaborative structures. Notably, open innovation and crowd-sourcing-of expertise and/or funding-has tremendous potential to increase the efficiency with which biomedical ecosystems interact to deliver safe, efficacious and affordable therapies to patients. Consequently, such practices offer tremendous potential in advancing development of cellular therapies. In this vein, the CASMI Translational Stem Cell Consortium (CTSCC) was formed to unite global thought-leaders, producing academically rigorous and commercially practicable solutions to a range of challenges in pluripotent stem cell translation. Critically, the CTSCC research agenda is defined through continuous consultation with its international funding and research partners. Herein, initial findings for all research focus areas are presented to inform global product development strategies, and to stimulate continued industry interaction around biomanufacturing, strategic partnerships, standards, regulation and intellectual property and clinical adoption.

A comparison of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in National Cancer Institute-sponsored cancer treatment trials conducted during two time periods: 1999–2003 and 2003–2008

6618

Background: Over the past decade, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) support for incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) into disease treatment clinical trials has grown considerably, both in the number of trials, as well as the types of research questions being addressed and the measures used to answer the questions. This presentation will compare the breadth of NCI supported Phase III treatment trials in breast, colo-rectal, lung, and prostate cancers that include PRO secondary endpoints activated during two time periods: 1999–2003 and 2003–2008. Both time periods will be compared to identify the number and type of PRO measures; in addition the targeted PRO domain will be examined by cancer site. Methods: For this study, PRO was broadly defined to include any self-report questionnaire that gathered data on the potential impact that disease treatment might have on patient functioning, quality of life, or symptoms. Using the terms, 'protocol title, lead disease, phase III, quality of life, and instrument name,’ a search was conducted of the NCI database containing breast, colo-rectal, lung, and prostate Phase III treatment trials activated during the two time periods. If a scale was used more than once or if different versions of the scale were used, i.e., FACT-G and FACT-BR, it was only counted once. Results: Between 1999 and 2003, 42 phase III trials in the four major cancers were activated, with 15 trials having one or more PROs as secondary endpoints. Between 2003 and 2008, 50 phase III trials in the four major cancers were activated, with 28 trials having one or more PROs as secondary endpoints. Although the data reveal a 20% increase in the number of phase III trials in the 4 diseases between the two time periods, the number of trials with PRO endpoints has doubled. Conclusions: This significant increase in the use of PROs in phase III trials gives investigators additional data to fully analyze the impact of new treatments. These PRO data will provide researchers, clinicians, and future patients with a more in-depth understanding of the potential for new cancer therapies and technologies to extend both the quantity and quality of life.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Is patient self-reporting more accurate than clinician reporting of symptoms for predicting survival in patients with cancer? Meta-analysis of 30 closed EORTC randomized controlled trials

9597

Background: This study investigated whether patient self-reporting of symptoms improved prediction of survival as compared to clinician reporting or whether it provided an additive value when taken together with clinician assessment of the same symptoms. Methods: Patients with advanced cancer from 30 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Randomized Controlled Trials were included in this retrospective pooled analysis. Clinician [Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC)] and patient (EORTC QLQ-C30) symptom assessment were reported at entry into the study. Data were obtained for six symptoms: pain, fatigue, vomiting, nausea, diarrhea and constipation. The prognostic accuracy for survival was assessed by modeling the contrast in reporting using the Harrell's discrimination c-index (c). Results: Data were available from patient and clinician assessment for pain [number of trials (t) =8, number of patients (n) =1214], fatigue [t=5, n=1237], vomiting [t=5, n=824], nausea [t=6, n=1393], diarrhea [t=6, n=815] and constipation [t=4, n=751]. Fatigue (c=0.59 vs 0.55, p<.01) and constipation (c=0.57 vs 0.52, p=0.03) as reported by patients (vs clinicians) were significantly higher in predicting survival. Patient reported pain (c=0.59 vs 0.58, p=0.17), nausea (c=0.54 vs 0.52, p=0.51), vomiting (c=0.55 vs 0.52, p=0.21) and diarrhea (c=0.51 vs 0.52, p=0.49) did not predict survival any more accurately than clinician assessment. Patient and clinician assessment combined (vs clinicians alone) improved the prognostic accuracy for fatigue (c=0.61 vs 0.55, p=0.01), pain (c=0.60 vs 0.58, p<0.01), nausea (c=0.54 vs 0.52, p=0.04), vomiting (c=0.56 vs 0.52, p=0.04) and constipation (c=0.5 vs 0.52, p=0.01), but not for diarrhea (c=0.52 vs 0.52, p=0.44). Conclusions: Our results suggest that patients’ ratings of their own fatigue and constipation have more prognostic value than clinicians’ ratings of these symptoms. Further, the prognostic value of clinicians's ratings can be improved by combining them with patients’ assessments for the symptoms pain, fatigue, constipation, nausea and vomiting.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Relationships among health-related quality of life indicators in cancer patients: A pooled study of baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 data from 6,739 patients

9612

Background: Cancer patients frequently experience multiple and co-occuring problems due to their illness and therapies. Clusters are defined as groups of two or more Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) indicators that occur concurrently and may or may not have a common related cause. The objective of this meta-analysis was to identify how HRQoL indicators cluster among cancer patients. Methods: Retrospective pooling of 29 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized clinical trials, among 10 cancer sites, yielded baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 HRQoL data for a total of 6739 patients. A cluster analysis was performed to identify clusters among the 15 HRQoL scales, via Ward's method. Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) was used to measure internal consistency. Dendrograms of the HRQoL indicators were plotted for the overall data and for each cancer site. Results: Three main clusters emerged from the pooled dataset: a physical function-related cluster, consisting of physical and role functioning, fatigue and pain (α = 0.83); a psychological function-related cluster, consisting of emotional and cognitive functioning and insomnia (α = 0.64); and a gastrointestinal cluster, consisting of nausea and vomiting and appetite loss (α = 0.68). The same clusters were found in patients with metastatic and non-metastatic disease. The gastrointestinal cluster was reproduced in all 10 cancer sites. We found that pain was not correlated with the other variables of the physical function cluster for patients with brain, colorectal or pancreatic cancer. For the psychological component cluster, cognitive functioning was not correlated with the other variables of the cluster for breast or pancreatic cancer patients, while insomnia was found not to be correlated with the other variables of the cluster for prostate cancer patients. Conclusions: This study shows that relationships among HRQoL indicators exist and that three major constructs can be found: a physical, a psychological and a gastrointestinal component. Understanding these relationships may aid diagnostic criteria, and assessment, management, and prioritization of symptom care.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Ventilator circuit and secretion management strategies: a Franco-Canadian survey

OBJECTIVE

To determine the use of ventilator circuit and secretion management strategies in France and Canada.

DESIGN

Binational cross-sectional survey.

POPULATION

Intensive care unit (ICU) directors in French and Canadian university hospitals.

MEASUREMENTS

We compared responses between countries regarding the use of seven circuit and secretion strategies, the rationales against their use, decisional responsibility for these strategies, whether ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) practice was audited, and whether VAP prevention guidelines addressing these strategies were used.

RESULTS

The response rate was 72/84 (85.7%) for French and 31/32 (96.9%) for Canadian ICUs. Endotracheal intubation was predominantly oral in both countries. Changing the ventilator circuits only for every new patient was more frequent in France than in Canada (p < .0001). Heated humidifiers were used more in Canada than France (p = .0003). Closed endotracheal suctioning was used more frequently in Canada (p < .0001). In both countries, subglottic secretion drainage and kinetic beds were rarely used. Semirecumbent positioning was reported more often by French than Canadian ICUs (p = .003). Reasons for nonuse of these strategies included adverse effects (heat and moisture exchangers), cost (kinetic beds), lack of convincing benefit (subglottic secretion drainage), and nurse inconvenience (semirecumbency). Decisional responsibility for each strategy differed among institutions. VAP prevention practice was periodically reviewed in 53% of French and 68% of Canadian ICUs (p = .20). VAP prevention guidelines were used in 64% and 30% of these ICUs, respectively (p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study does not support the notion that published recommendations substantially impact reported use of several ventilator circuit and secretion management strategies. Based on the use of more frequent ventilator circuit changes, closed suctioning systems, heated humidifiers, and respiratory therapists, ventilator circuit and secretion management practice appears more costly in Canada than in France.

The tolerometer: a fast, automated method for the measurement of righting reflex latency in chronic drug studies

We describe a fast, automated system for the measurement of righting reflex latencies in drug studies. This system, which we call a 'tolerometer', is especially useful for studies of drug tolerance which require a simple measurement of motor behaviour on a daily basis, for long periods of time. The tolerometer consists of a semi-cylindrical platform positioned on a 2 kg load cell, connected to a strain gauge amplifier (Radio Spares Ltd). The output from the amplifier is connected to a MacLab data acquisition system (Analog Digital Instruments), controlled by a Macintosh Classic computer. The MacLab Chart program is used to display, on the Macintosh screen, the load changes which occur during a righting reflex; sampling frequencies up to 40 kHz can be used, but we find 20-100 Hz adequate. Using measurement cursors provided by the Chart program, the latency from the point at which an animal is placed on the tolerometer platform in the supine position, until the completion of a righting reflex, can be measured accurately and easily.

Simple device for quantifying drug effects on the righting reflex

A simple, inexpensive device is described that allows quantification of the effects of drugs on the righting reflex. This device consists of a modified set of kitchen scales connected to a digital timer. Two moveable Hall effect switches are positioned around the pointer, which registers the weight of the animal on the scales; when the animal is placed on the scales in the supine position, the initiation of a righting reflex causes the pointer to cross one of the switches, stopping the digital timer and providing a measure of righting reflex latency (RRL). We describe an efficient protocol for using this device that provides quantification of drug effects on the RRL, which can then be subjected to analysis using parametric statistics such as analysis of variance.