1
|
Venetis CA, Storr A, Chua SJ, Mol BW, Longobardi S, Yin X, D'Hooghe T. What is the optimal GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation during ART treatment? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2023; 29:307-326. [PMID: 36594696 PMCID: PMC10152179 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several GnRH antagonist protocols are currently used during COS in the context of ART treatments; however, questions remain regarding whether these protocols are comparable in terms of efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE A systematic review followed by a pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed. The systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of direct comparative data according to the PRISMA guidelines evaluated the effectiveness of different GnRH antagonist protocols (fixed Day 5/6 versus flexible, ganirelix versus cetrorelix, with or without hormonal pretreatment) on the probability of live birth and ongoing pregnancy after COS during ART treatment. A frequentist network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect comparisons (using the long GnRH agonist protocol as the comparator) was also performed to enhance the precision of the estimates. SEARCH METHODS The systematic literature search was performed using Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Trials (CENTRAL), SCOPUS and Web of Science (WOS), from inception until 23 November 2021. The search terms comprised three different MeSH terms that should be present in the identified studies: GnRH antagonist; assisted reproduction treatment; randomized controlled trial (RCT). Only studies published in English were included. OUTCOMES The search strategy resulted in 6738 individual publications, of which 102 were included in the systematic review (corresponding to 75 unique studies) and 73 were included in the meta-analysis. Most studies were of low quality. One study compared a flexible protocol with a fixed Day 5 protocol and the remaining RCTs with a fixed Day 6 protocol. There was a lack of data regarding live birth when comparing the flexible and fixed GnRH antagonist protocols or cetrorelix and ganirelix. No significant difference in live birth rate was observed between the different pretreatment regimens versus no pretreatment or between the different pretreatment protocols. A flexible GnRH antagonist protocol resulted in a significantly lower OPR compared with a fixed Day 5/6 protocol (relative risk (RR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.94, I2 = 0%; 6 RCTs; n = 907 participants; low certainty evidence). There were insufficient data for a comparison of cetrorelix and ganirelix for OPR. OCP pretreatment was associated with a lower OPR compared with no pretreatment intervention (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.92; I2 = 0%; 5 RCTs, n = 1318 participants; low certainty evidence). Furthermore, in the network meta-analysis, a fixed protocol with OCP resulted in a significantly lower OPR than a fixed protocol with no pretreatment (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.99; moderate quality evidence). The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) scores suggested that the fixed protocol with no pretreatment is the antagonist protocol most likely (84%) to result in the highest OPR. There was insufficient evidence of a difference between fixed/flexible or OCP pretreatment/no pretreatment interventions regarding other outcomes, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and miscarriage rates. WIDER IMPLICATIONS Available evidence, mostly of low quality and certainty, suggests that different antagonist protocols should not be considered as equivalent for clinical decision-making. More trials are required to assess the comparative effectiveness of ganirelix versus cetrorelix, the effect of different pretreatment interventions (e.g. progestins or oestradiol) or the effect of different criteria for initiation of the antagonist in the flexible protocol. Furthermore, more studies are required examining the optimal GnRH antagonist protocol in women with high or low response to ovarian stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Venetis
- University of New South Wales, Faculty of Medicine & Health, Centre for Big Data Research in Health & Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sydney, Australia.,IVFAustralia, Alexandria, NSW, Australia
| | - A Storr
- Flinders Fertility, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - S J Chua
- Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - B W Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - S Longobardi
- Global Clinical Development, Merck Serono S.p.A, Rome, Italy, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | - X Yin
- EMD Serono Inc., R&D Global Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Medical Writing, Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | - T D'Hooghe
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.,Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lainas GT, Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Chatzimeletiou K, Venetis CA, Bosdou JK, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF, Kolibianakis EM. Is oocyte maturation rate associated with triptorelin dose used for triggering final oocyte maturation in patients at high risk for severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? Hum Reprod 2020; 34:1770-1777. [PMID: 31384921 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Are oocyte maturation rates different among 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 mg triptorelin used for triggering final oocyte maturation in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) undergoing ICSI? SUMMARY ANSWER A dose of 0.1 mg triptorelin results in similar oocyte maturation rates compared to higher doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg in patients at high risk for OHSS undergoing ICSI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The GnRH agonist triptorelin is widely used instead of hCG for triggering final oocyte maturation, in order to eliminate the risk of severe OHSS in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. However, limited data are currently available regarding its optimal dose use for this purpose in patients at high risk for OHSS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A retrospective study was performed between November 2015 and July 2017 in 131 infertile patients at high risk for severe OHSS undergoing ovarian stimulation for ICSI. High risk for severe OHSS was defined as the presence of at least 19 follicles ≥11 mm in diameter on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Ovarian stimulation was performed with recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. Patients received 0.1 (n = 42), 0.2 (n = 46) or 0.4 mg (n = 43) triptorelin for triggering final oocyte maturation. Hormonal evaluation of FSH, LH, estradiol (E2) and progesterone (PRG) was carried out on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, 8 and 36 hours post triggering and 3, 5, 7, and 10 days after triptorelin administration. During this period, all patients were assessed for symptoms and signs indicative of severe OHSS development. Primary outcome measure was oocyte maturation rate, defined as the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes divided by the number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes retrieved per patient. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE No significant differences in patient baseline characteristics were observed among the 0.1 mg, the 0.2 mg and the 0.4 mg groups. Regarding the primary outcome measure, no differences were observed in oocyte maturation rate among the three groups compared [82.6% (17.8%) versus 83.3% (18.8%) versus 85.1% (17.2%), respectively, P = 0.686].In addition, no significant differences were present among the 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg groups, regarding the number of mature (MII) oocytes [21 (13) versus 20 (6) versus 20 (11), respectively; P = 0.582], the number of oocytes retrieved [25.5 (13) versus 24.5 (11) versus 23 (12), respectively; P = 0.452], oocyte retrieval rate [81.0% (17.7%) versus 76.5% (23.5%) versus 75.0% (22.5), respectively; P = 0.088], the number of fertilized (two pronuclei) oocytes [12.5 (9) versus 14.5 (7) versus 14.0 (8), respectively; P = 0.985], fertilization rate [71.7% (22%) versus 77.1% (19.1%) versus 76.6% (23.3%), respectively; P = 0.525] and duration of luteal phase [7 (1) versus 8 (2) versus 7 (1) days, respectively; P = 0.632]. Moreover, no significant differences were present among the three triptorelin groups regarding serum levels of LH, FSH, E2 and PRG at any of the time points assessed following triggering of final oocyte maturation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This is a retrospective study, and although there were no differences in the baseline characteristics of the three groups compared, the presence of bias cannot be excluded. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Based on the results of the current study, it appears that triggering final oocyte maturation with a lower (0.1 mg) or a higher dose (0.4 mg) of triptorelin, as compared to the most commonly used dose of 0.2 mg, does not confer any benefit in terms of oocyte maturation rate in patients at high risk for severe OHSS. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G T Lainas
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Eugonia Unit of Assisted Reproduction, Athens, Greece
| | - T G Lainas
- Eugonia Unit of Assisted Reproduction, Athens, Greece
| | | | - K Chatzimeletiou
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C A Venetis
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Women's and Children's Health UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - J K Bosdou
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - B C Tarlatzis
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - G F Grimbizis
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - E M Kolibianakis
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bosdou JK, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF, Kolibianakis EM. Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2020; 34:491-505. [PMID: 30689865 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does the outcome of the comparison of live birth rates between the first frozen embryo transfer (ET) (in a freeze-only cycles strategy, i.e. frozen ET group) and a fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET group) differ considering the type of ovarian response? SUMMARY ANSWER Α significantly higher probability of live birth is present in high, but not normal, responders, after the first frozen ET in a freeze-only cycle strategy as compared to a fresh ET. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY It has been hypothesised that freezing all good embryos in a fresh in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle and deferring embryo transfer in subsequent cycles may provide a more physiological endometrial environment for embryo implantation when compared to a fresh ET. However, currently, three relevant meta-analyses have been published with conflicting results, while none of them has taken into consideration the type of ovarian response. Recently, the publication of additional, large relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with different types of ovarian response makes possible the comparative evaluation of the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) versus fresh ET, considering the type of ovarian response. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to identify RCTs comparing the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) to a fresh ET. The main outcome was live birth, while secondary outcomes included ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and miscarriage. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We identified eight eligible RCTs, including 5265 patients, which evaluated the first frozen ET in a freeze-only cycle strategy versus a fresh ET either in high responders (n = 4) or in normal responders (n = 4). No relevant RCTs were present in poor responders. Meta-analysis of weighted data using fixed and random effects model was performed. Results are reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Eligible RCTs were published between 2011 and 2018. Four RCTs (n = 3255 patients) compared the first frozen ET (in a freeze-only cycle strategy) to a fresh ET in normal responders and four RCTs (n = 2010 patients) did the comparison in high responders. In high responders, a significantly higher probability of live birth was observed in the frozen ET group when compared with the fresh ET group (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06-1.31; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; three studies; n = 3398 patients). However the probability of live birth was not significantly different between the frozen ET group and the fresh ET group in normal responders (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.90-1.41; random effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 77%; three studies; n = 1608 patients). The risk of moderate/severe OHSS was significantly lower in the frozen ET group when compared with the fresh ET group both in high (RR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.37; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: not applicable; a single study; n = 1508 patients) and normal responders (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.80; fixed effects model; heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; two studies; n = 2939 patients). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Considerable heterogeneity was present among the studies, regarding ovarian stimulation protocols and the triggering signal used for inducing final oocyte maturation as well as the cryopreservation methods, while the quality of evidence was poor for the live birth rate in high responders. Moreover, the analysis did not apply a standard for determining 'high' or 'normal' responders since the type of ovarian response followed the characterisation of populations as reported by the authors of the eligible studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS A freeze-only cycle strategy should be the preferred option in high responders since it enhances the probability of live birth, while reducing the chance of moderate/severe OHSS. In normal responders, the same strategy could be applied, in the interest of patient safety or clinic convenience, without compromising the chances of live birth. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was used and there were no competing interests. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018099389.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Bosdou
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C A Venetis
- University of New South Wales, Centre for Big Data Research in Health & School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| | - B C Tarlatzis
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - G F Grimbizis
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - E M Kolibianakis
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lainas GT, Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Venetis CA, Kyprianou MA, Petsas GK, Tarlatzis BC, Kolibianakis EM. A decision-making algorithm for performing or cancelling embryo transfer in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after triggering final oocyte maturation with hCG. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020:hoaa013. [PMID: 32529046 PMCID: PMC7275634 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Can the grade of ascites, haematocrit (Ht), white blood cell (WBC) count and maximal ovarian diameter (MOD) measured on Day 3 be used to construct a decision-making algorithm for performing or cancelling embryo transfer in patients at high risk for severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) after an hCG trigger? SUMMARY ANSWER Using cut-offs of ascites grade>2, Ht>39.2%, WBC>12 900/mm3 and MOD>85 mm on Day 3, a decision-making algorithm was constructed that could predict subsequent development of severe OHSS on Day 5 with an AUC of 0.93, a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 84.2% in high-risk patients triggered with hCG. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Despite the increasing popularity of GnRH agonist trigger for final oocyte maturation as a way to prevent OHSS, ≥75% of IVF cycles still involve an hCG trigger. Numerous risk factors and predictive models of OHSS have been proposed, but the measurement of these early predictors is restricted either prior to or during the controlled ovarian stimulation. In high-risk patients triggered with hCG, the identification of luteal-phase predictors assessed post-oocyte retrieval, which reflect the pathophysiological changes leading to severe early OHSS, is currently lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A retrospective study of 321 patients at high risk for severe OHSS following hCG triggering of final oocyte maturation. High risk for OHSS was defined as the presence of at least 19 follicles ≥11 mm on the day of triggering of final oocyte maturation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The study includes IVF/ICSI patients at high risk for developing severe OHSS, who administered hCG to trigger final oocyte maturation. Ascites grade, MOD, Ht and WBC were assessed in the luteal phase starting from the day of oocyte retrieval. Outcome measures were the optimal thresholds of ascites grade, MOD, Ht and WBC measured on Day 3 post-oocyte retrieval to predict subsequent severe OHSS development on Day 5. These criteria were used to construct a decision-making algorithm for embryo transfer, based on the estimated probability of severe OHSS development on Day 5. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The optimal Day 3 cutoffs for severe OHSS prediction on Day 5 were ascites grade>2, Ht>39.2%, WBC>12 900/mm3 and MOD>85 mm. The probability of severe OHSS with no criteria fulfilled on Day 3 is 0% (95% CI: 0–5.5); with one criterion, 0.8% (95% CI: 0.15–4.6); with two criteria, 13.3% (95% CI: 7.4–22.8); with three criteria, 37.2% (95% CI: 24.4–52.1); and with four criteria, 88.9% (95% CI, 67.2–98.1). The predictive model of severe OHSS had an AUC of 0.93 with a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 84.2%. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This is a retrospective study, and therefore, it cannot be excluded that non-apparent sources of bias might be present. In addition, we acknowledge the lack of external validation of our model. We have created a web-based calculator (http://ohsspredict.org), for wider access and usage of our tool. By inserting the values of ascites grade, MOD, Ht and WBC of high-risk patients on Day 3 after oocyte retrieval, the clinician instantly receives the predicted probability of severe OHSS development on Day 5. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The present study describes a novel decision-making algorithm for embryo transfer based on ascites, Ht, WBC and MOD measurements on Day 3. The algorithm may be useful for the management of high-risk patients triggered with hCG and for helping the clinician’s decision to proceed with, or to cancel, embryo transfer. It must be emphasized that the availability of the present decision-making algorithm should in no way encourage the use of hCG trigger in patients at high risk for OHSS. In these patients, the recommended approach is the use of GnRH antagonist protocols, GnRH agonist trigger and elective embryo cryopreservation. In addition, in patients triggered with hCG, freezing all embryos and luteal-phase GnRH antagonist administration should be considered for the outpatient management of severe early OHSS and prevention of late OHSS. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (GNT1147154) to C.A.V. No conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GT Lainas
- Eugonia Assisted Reproduction Unit, 7 Ventiri Street, 11528 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence address. Eugonia Assisted Reproduction Unit, 7 Ventiri Street, 11528 Athens, Greece. Tel: +302107236333; E-mail:
| | - TG Lainas
- Eugonia Assisted Reproduction Unit, 7 Ventiri Street, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - IA Sfontouris
- Eugonia Assisted Reproduction Unit, 7 Ventiri Street, 11528 Athens, Greece
- Division of Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - CA Venetis
- UNSW Medicine, Centre for Big Data Research in Health, Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - MA Kyprianou
- Eugonia Assisted Reproduction Unit, 7 Ventiri Street, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - GK Petsas
- Eugonia Assisted Reproduction Unit, 7 Ventiri Street, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - BC Tarlatzis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - EM Kolibianakis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chambers GM, Venetis CA, Jorm LR, Stavrou EP, Vajdic CM. Parity: A key measure of confounding in data-linkage studies of outcomes after medically assisted reproduction. Int J Popul Data Sci 2020; 5:1119. [PMID: 32935047 PMCID: PMC7473264 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Parity is a potential confounder of the association between medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and health outcomes. This concept paper describes a population-based record linkage study design for selecting MAR-unexposed women matched to the parity of MAR-exposed women, at the time of the first exposure to MAR. Women exposed to MAR were identified from claims for government subsidies for relevant procedures and prescription medicines, linked to perinatal records. Women unexposed to MAR were identified from linked perinatal and death records, matched to exposed women by age, rurality, age of first child (if any) and parity at the date of first MAR. The availability of a longitudinal, whole-of-population dataset (“population spine”) based on enrolments in Australia’s universal health insurance scheme was a critical design element. The example application examines cancer risk in women after exposure to MAR. Parity is a confounder in this setting because it is associated with MAR and hormone-sensitive cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G M Chambers
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - C A Venetis
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - L R Jorm
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - E P Stavrou
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - C M Vajdic
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Venetis CA. Monozygotic twinning after PGT: methodological considerations. BJOG 2020; 127:570. [PMID: 31953980 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C A Venetis
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,IVF Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- C A Venetis
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,IVF Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Venetis CA, Mol BW, Kolibianakis EM. Low as well as high serum P4 levels in the early and mid-luteal phase reduce the chance of a live birth following IVF treatment with fresh embryo transfer: where is the evidence? Hum Reprod 2018; 33:2312-2313. [PMID: 30325399 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C A Venetis
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, Level 1, AGSM Building G27, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,IVFAustralia, Suite 15, Level 3, St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - B W Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - E M Kolibianakis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Ring Road, N. Efkarpia, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vermey BG, Buchanan A, Chambers GM, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou J, Chapman MG, Venetis CA. Are singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART) associated with a higher risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2018; 126:209-218. [PMID: 29740927 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Placental anomalies (placenta praevia, placental abruption, morbidly adherent placenta and cord insertion anomalies) are associated with maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. It has been suggested these might be more prevalent in pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART). OBJECTIVES To determine whether ART singleton pregnancies are associated with an increased risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies. SEARCH STRATEGY MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus (January 2018). SELECTION CRITERIA Cohort studies reporting placental anomalies in ART and non-ART singleton pregnancies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We report pooled odds ratios (OR) for the comparisons: (1) ART versus SC (spontaneously conceived), (2) ART versus non-ART (unspecified), (3) FET-ART (frozen-embryo transfer) versus SC, (4) ART versus non-ART (subfertile patients). Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle -Ottawa scale. MAIN RESULTS 33 low/moderate quality studies evaluated 124 215 ART and 6 054 729 non-ART singleton pregnancies. Risk of placenta praevia, placental abruption and morbidly adherent placenta was higher in ART than SC pregnancies: odds ratio (OR) (OR 3.76, 95% CI 3.09-4.59); (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.70-2.06) and (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.79-2.87) respectively. Risk of placenta praevia and placental abruption was higher in ART than in non-ART (subfertile patients): (OR 2.51, 95% CI 2.12-2.98) and (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.33-1.95) respectively. Results were similar when comparing ART with unspecified non-ART pregnancies. Risk of placenta praevia was higher, but not significantly so, in FET-ART than in SC pregnancies (OR 2.42, 95% CI 0.63-9.30). CONCLUSIONS Singleton ART pregnancies are associated with an increased risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT A review of over 6 million singleton pregnancies finds increased risk of placental anomalies after ART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B G Vermey
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A Buchanan
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - G M Chambers
- National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - E M Kolibianakis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - J Bosdou
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - M G Chapman
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,IVF Australia, South Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - C A Venetis
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,IVF Australia, South Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lainas GT, Lainas TG, Venetis CA, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Alexopoulou E, Tarlatzis BC, Kolibianakis EM. Ultrasound and hematological changes during early luteal phase in women at high risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 51:126-133. [PMID: 29105961 DOI: 10.1002/uog.18949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2017] [Revised: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess ultrasound and hematological changes during the early luteal phase following triggering of final oocyte maturation with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in women at high risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 319 women undergoing in-vitro fertilization who were at high risk for OHSS following administration of hCG for the triggering of final oocyte maturation. Patients were treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist protocol and were monitored for 5 days post-oocyte retrieval (early luteal phase). Severe OHSS was diagnosed in the presence of at least moderate ascites and two or more of the following: maximum ovarian diameter (MOD) > 100 mm, hematocrit (Ht) > 45%, white blood cell count (WBC) > 15 000/mm3 , hydrothorax, dyspnea and oliguria. Outcome measures included change in Ht, ascites grade, WBC and MOD, as well as the association between these changes during the early luteal phase. RESULTS Ascites grade, Ht and WBC increased significantly (P ≤ 0.001) during the early luteal phase, both in patients who developed and in those who did not develop severe early OHSS. MOD increased significantly (P = 0.001) only in patients who developed severe early OHSS. On multivariable analysis, both time following oocyte retrieval and whether severe early OHSS developed were significantly associated with ascites grade, Ht, WBC and MOD; furthermore, there was also a significant interaction between time and development of severe early OHSS for all four variables (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In women at high risk of OHSS, ascites grade, Ht and WBC significantly increased with time over the 5-day observation period, in line with the pathophysiology of the syndrome. Our data support the use of MOD in the diagnosis of severe early OHSS, and provide novel evidence for the role of change in Ht as a patient-specific hemoconcentration marker during development of OHSS. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G T Lainas
- Eugonia Assisted Reproduction Unit, Athens, Greece
| | - T G Lainas
- Eugonia Assisted Reproduction Unit, Athens, Greece
| | - C A Venetis
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, St George Hospital, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - E Alexopoulou
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - B C Tarlatzis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - E M Kolibianakis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bosdou JK, Venetis CA, Dafopoulos K, Zepiridis L, Chatzimeletiou K, Anifandis G, Mitsoli A, Makedos A, Messinis IE, Tarlatzis BC, Kolibianakis EM. Transdermal testosterone pretreatment in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:977-85. [PMID: 26956551 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does pretreatment with transdermal testosterone increase the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) retrieved by more than 1.5 in poor responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), using recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa)? SUMMARY ANSWER Testosterone pretreatment failed to increase the number of COCs by more than 1.5 as compared with no pretreatment in poor responders undergoing ICSI (difference between medians: 0.0, 95% CI: -1.0 to +1.0). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Androgens are thought to play an important role in early follicular development by enhancing ovarian sensitivity to FSH. In a recent meta-analysis, testosterone pretreatment resulted in an increase of 1.5 COCs as compared with no pretreatment. However, this effect was based on the analysis of only two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 163 patients. Evidently, there is a need for additional RCTs that will allow firmer conclusions to be drawn. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The present RCT was designed to detect a difference of 1.5 COCs (sample size required = 48 patients). From 02/2014 until 04/2015, 50 poor responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria have been randomized (using a randomization list) to either testosterone pretreatment for 21 days ( ITALIC! n = 26) or no pretreatment ( ITALIC! n = 24). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS All patients underwent a long follicular GnRHa protocol. Recombinant FSH stimulation was started on Day 22 following GnRHa initiation. In the testosterone pretreatment group, a daily dose of 10 mg of testosterone gel was applied transdermally for 21 days starting from GnRHa initiation. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE No differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups compared. Testosterone levels [median (interquartile range)] were significantly higher in the testosterone pretreatment on the day of initiation of FSH stimulation [114 (99.5) ng/dl versus 20 (20) ng/dl, respectively, ITALIC! P < 0.001]. Duration of FSH stimulation [median (interquartile range)] was similar between the groups compared [12.5 (3.0) days versus 12 (3.0) days, respectively, ITALIC! P = 0.52]. The number of COCs retrieved [median (interquartile range)] was not different between the testosterone pretreatment and the no pretreatment groups [3.5 (4.0) versus 3.0 (3.0), 95% CI for the median: 2.0-5.0 versus 2.7-4.3, respectively; difference between medians: 0.0, 95% CI: +1.0 to -1.0). Similarly no differences were observed regarding fertilization rates [median (interquartile range)] [66.7% (32.5) versus 66.7% (42.9), respectively, ITALIC! P = 0.97] and live birth rates per randomized patient (7.7% versus 8.3%, respectively, rate difference: -0.6%, 95% CI: -19.0 to +16.9). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The study was not powered to detect differences less than 1.5 COCs, although it is doubtful whether these differences would be clinically relevant. Moreover, due to sample size restrictions, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the probability of live birth. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The results of this randomized clinical trial, suggesting that pretreatment with 10 mg of transdermal testosterone for 21 days does not improve ovarian response by more than 1.5 oocytes, could be used to more accurately consult patients with poor ovarian response. However, an improvement in IVF outcome using a higher dose of testosterone or a longer pretreatment period cannot be excluded. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST The study was partially funded by a Scholarship from the Academy of Athens. C.A.V. reports personal fees and non-financial support from Merck, Sharp and Dome, personal fees and non-financial support from Merck Serono, personal fees and non-financial support from IPSEN Hellas S.A., outside the submitted work. B.C.T. reports grants from Merck Serono, grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme, personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, personal fees from IBSA & Ferring, outside the submitted work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01961336. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 10 October 2013. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLLMENT 02/2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Bosdou
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C A Venetis
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - K Dafopoulos
- Unit for Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - L Zepiridis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - K Chatzimeletiou
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - G Anifandis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - A Mitsoli
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - A Makedos
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - I E Messinis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - B C Tarlatzis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - E M Kolibianakis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Lainas GT, Sfontouris IA, Tarlatzis BC, Lainas TG. Estimating the net effect of progesterone elevation on the day of hCG on live birth rates after IVF: a cohort analysis of 3296 IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 2015; 30:684-91. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
13
|
Athanatos D, Pados G, Venetis CA, Stamatopoulos P, Rousso D, Tsolakidis D, Stamatopoulos CP, Tarlatzis BC. Novasure impedance control system versus microwave endometrial ablation for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. CLIN EXP OBSTET GYN 2015; 42:347-351. [PMID: 26152008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION To compare the efficacy and safety of two different second-generation ablation devices, Novasure impedance control system and microwave endometrial ablation (MEA), in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a randomized controlled trial that took place in a single Gynecological Department of a University Hospital. Sixty-six women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB), unresponsive to medical treatment, were included in the trial. The ratio of women allocated to bipolar radio-frequency ablation or MEA was 1:1. Follow-up assessments were carried out at three and 12 months post-ablation. The present main outcome measure was amenorrhea rates 12-months post-treatment. RESULTS The rate of amenorrhea at 12-months post-ablation was significantly higher in women treated by Novasure (25/33; 75.8%) as compared to those treated by MEA (8/33; 24.2%) (rate difference: +51.5%, 95% CI: +27.8 to +67.7). CONCLUSION In women with DUB, endometrial ablation with Novasure bipolar radiofrequency impedance-controlled system is associated with increased rates of amenorrhea at 12-months post-treatment as compared to the MEA method.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Bosdou JK, Zepiridis L, Chatzimeletiou K, Makedos A, Masouridou S, Triantafillidis S, Mitsoli A, Tarlatzis BC. Corifollitropin alfa compared with follitropin beta in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2014; 30:432-40. [PMID: 25492411 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does substituting 150 µg corifollitropin alfa for 450 IU follitropin beta during the first 7 days of ovarian stimulation in proven poor responders, result in retrieval of a non-inferior number (<1.5 fewer) of cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs)? SUMMARY ANSWER A single s.c. dose of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa on the first day of ovarian stimulation, followed if necessary, from Day 8 onwards, with 450 IU of follitropin beta/day, is not inferior to daily doses of 450 IU follitropin beta. The 95% CI of the difference between medians in the number of oocytes retrieved was -1 to +1 within the safety margin of 1.5. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Recent data from retrospective studies suggest that the use of corifollitropin alfa in poor responders is promising since it could simplify ovarian stimulation without compromising its outcome. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Seventy-nine women with previous poor ovarian response undergoing ICSI treatment were enrolled in this open label, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial (RCT). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Inclusion criteria were: previous poor response to ovarian stimulation (≤4 COCs) after maximal stimulation, age <45 years, regular spontaneous menstrual cycle, body mass index: 18-32 kg/m(2) and basal follicle stimulating hormone ≤20 IU/l. On Day 2 of the menstrual cycle, patients were administered either a single s.c dose of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa (n = 40) or a fixed daily dose of 450 IU of follitropin beta (n = 39). In the corifollitropin alfa group, 450 IU of follitropin beta were administered from Day 8 of stimulation until the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration, if necessary. To inhibit premature luteinizing hormone surge, the gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix was used. Triggering of final oocyte maturation was performed using 250 µg of recombinant hCG, when at least two follicles reached 17 mm in mean diameter. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The number of COCs retrieved was not statistically different between the corifollitropin alfa and the follitropin beta groups [Median 3 versus 2, 95% CI 2-4, 2-3, respectively, P = 0.26]. The 95% CI of the difference between medians in the number of oocytes retrieved was -1 to +1. A multivariable analysis adjusting for all the potential baseline differences confirmed this finding. No significant difference was observed regarding the probability of live birth between the corifollitropin alfa and the follitropin beta group (live birth per patient reaching oocyte retrieval: 7.9 versus 2.6%, respectively, difference +5.3%, 95% CI: -6.8 to +18.3). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The present study was not powered to test a smaller difference (e.g. 1 COC) in terms of COCs retrieved as well as to show potential differences in the probability of pregnancy. Moreover, it would be interesting to assess whether the continuation of stimulation in the long acting FSH arm, where necessary, with 200 IU instead of 450 IU of follitropin beta would have altered the direction or the magnitude of the effect of the type of FSH, observed on the number of COCs retrieved. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Corifollitropin alfa simplifies IVF treatment because it is administered in a GnRH antagonist protocol and replaces seven daily FSH injections with a single one of a long acting FSH without compromising the outcome. It could greatly reduce the burden of treatment for poor responders and this deserves further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Kolibianakis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C A Venetis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - J K Bosdou
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - L Zepiridis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - K Chatzimeletiou
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - A Makedos
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - S Masouridou
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - S Triantafillidis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - A Mitsoli
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - B C Tarlatzis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Nazzaro A, Salerno A, Di Iorio L, Landino G, Marino S, Pastore E, Fabregues F, Iraola A, Casals G, Creus M, Peralta S, Penarrubia J, Manau D, Civico S, Balasch J, Lindgren I, Giwercman YL, Celik E, Turkcuoglu I, Ata B, Karaer A, Kirici P, Berker B, Park J, Kim J, Rhee J, Krishnan M, Rustamov O, Russel R, Fitzgerald C, Roberts S, Hapuarachi S, Tan BK, Mathur RS, van de Vijver A, Blockeel C, Camus M, Polyzos N, Van Landuyt L, Tournaye H, Turhan NO, Hizli D, Kamalak Z, Kosus A, Kosus N, Kafali H, Lukaszuk A, Kunicki M, Liss J, Bednarowska A, Jakiel G, Lukaszuk K, Lukaszuk M, Olszak-Sokolowska B, Lukaszuk K, Kunicki M, Liss J, Jakiel G, Bednarowska A, Wasniewski T, Neuberg M, Lukaszuk M, Cavalcanti V, Peluso C, Lechado BL, Cordts EB, Christofolini DM, Barbosa CP, Bianco B, Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou J, Tarlatzis BC, Onal M, Gungor DN, Acet M, Kahraman S, Kuijper E, Twisk J, Caanen M, Korsen T, Hompes P, Kushnir M, Rockwood A, Meikle W, Lambalk CB, Hizli D, Kamalak Z, Kosus A, Kosus N, Turhan NO, Kafali H, Yan X, Dai X, Wang J, Zhao N, Cui Y, Liu J, Yarde F, Maas AHEM, Franx A, Eijkemans MJC, Drost JT, van Rijn BB, van Eyck J, van der Schouw YT, Broekmans FJM, Martyn F, Anglim B, Wingfield M, Fang T, Yan GJ, Sun HX, Hu YL, Chrudimska J, Krenkova P, Macek M, Macek M, Teixeira da Silva J, Cunha M, Silva J, Viana P, Goncalves A, Barros N, Oliveira C, Sousa M, Barros A, Nelson SM, Lloyd SM, McConnachie A, Khader A, Fleming R, Lawlor DA, Thuesen L, Andersen AN, Loft A, Smitz J, Abdel-Rahman M, Ismail S, Silk J, Abdellah M, Abdellah AH, Ruiz F, Cruz M, Piro M, Collado D, Garcia-Velasco JA, Requena A, Kollmann Z, Bersinger NA, McKinnon B, Schneider S, Mueller MD, von Wolff M, Vaucher A, Kollmann Z, Bersinger NA, Weiss B, Stute P, Marti U, von Wolff M, Chai J, Yeung WYT, Lee CYV, Li WHR, Ho PC, Ng HYE, Kim SM, Kim SH, Jee BC, Ku S, Suh CS, Choi YM, Kim JG, Moon SY, Lee JH, Kim SG, Kim YY, Kim HJ, Lee KH, Park IH, Sun HG, Hwang YI, Sung NY, Choi MH, Cha SH, Park CW, Kim JY, Yang KM, Song IO, Koong MK, Kang IS, Kim HO, Haines C, Wong WY, Kong WS, Cheung LP, Choy TK, Leung PC, Fadini R, Coticchio G, Renzini MM, Guglielmo MC, Brambillasca F, Hourvitz A, Albertini DF, Novara P, Merola M, Dal Canto M, Iza JAA, DePablo JL, Anarte C, Domingo A, Abanto E, Barrenetxea G, Kato R, Kawachiya S, Bodri D, Kondo M, Matsumoto T, Maldonado LGL, Setti AS, Braga DPAF, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Iaconelli C, Setti AS, Braga DPAF, Figueira RCS, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Kitaya K, Taguchi S, Funabiki M, Tada Y, Hayashi T, Nakamura Y, Snajderova M, Zemkova D, Lanska V, Teslik L, Calonge RN, Ortega L, Garcia A, Cortes S, Guijarro A, Peregrin PC, Bellavia M, Pesant MH, Wirthner D, Portman L, de Ziegler D, Wunder D, Chen X, Chen SHL, Liu YD, Tao T, Xu LJ, Tian XL, Ye DSH, He YX, Carby A, Barsoum E, El-Shawarby S, Trew G, Lavery S, Mishieva N, Barkalina N, Korneeva I, Ivanets T, Abubakirov A, Chavoshinejad R, Hartshorne GM, Marei W, Fouladi-nashta AA, Kyrkou G, Trakakis E, Chrelias CH, Alexiou E, Lykeridou K, Mastorakos G, Bersinger N, Kollmann Z, Mueller MD, Vaucher A, von Wolff M, Ferrero H, Gomez R, Garcia-Pascual CM, Simon C, Pellicer A, Turienzo A, Lledo B, Guerrero J, Ortiz JA, Morales R, Ten J, Llacer J, Bernabeu R, De Leo V, Focarelli R, Capaldo A, Stendardi A, Gambera L, Marca AL, Piomboni P, Kim JJ, Choi YM, Kang JH, Hwang KR, Chae SJ, Kim SM, Yoon SH, Ku SY, Kim SH, Kim JG, Moon SY, Iliodromiti S, Kelsey TW, Anderson RA, Nelson SM, Lee HJ, Weghofer A, Kushnir VA, Shohat-Tal A, Lazzaroni E, Lee HJ, Barad DH, Gleicher NN, Shavit T, Shalom-Paz E, Fainaru O, Michaeli M, Kartchovsky E, Ellenbogen A, Gerris J, Vandekerckhove F, Delvigne A, Dhont N, Madoc B, Neyskens J, Buyle M, Vansteenkiste E, De Schepper E, Pil L, Van Keirsbilck N, Verpoest W, Debacquer D, Annemans L, De Sutter P, Von Wolff M, Kollmann Z, Vaucher A, Weiss B, Bersinger NA, Verit FF, Keskin S, Sargin AK, Karahuseyinoglu S, Yucel O, Yalcinkaya S, Comninos AN, Jayasena CN, Nijher GMK, Abbara A, De Silva A, Veldhuis JD, Ratnasabapathy R, Izzi-Engbeaya C, Lim A, Patel DA, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Dhillo WS, Colodron M, Guillen JJ, Garcia D, Coll O, Vassena R, Vernaeve V, Pazoki H, Bolouri G, Farokhi F, Azarbayjani MA, Alebic MS, Stojanovic N, Abali R, Yuksel A, Aktas C, Celik C, Guzel S, Erfan G, Sahin O, Zhongying H, Shangwei L, Qianhong M, Wei F, Lei L, Zhun X, Yan W, Vandekerckhove F, De Baerdemaeker A, Gerris J, Tilleman K, Vansteelandt S, De Sutter P, Oliveira JBA, Baruffi RLR, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Nascimento AM, Vagnini L, Ricci J, Cavagna M, Massaro FC, Pontes A, Franco JG, El-khayat W, Elsadek M, Foroozanfard F, Saberi H, Moravvegi A, Kazemi M, Gidoni YS, Raziel A, Friedler S, Strassburger D, Hadari D, Kasterstein E, Ben-Ami I, Komarovsky D, Maslansky B, Bern O, Ron-El R, Izquierdo MP, Ten J, Guerrero J, Araico F, Llacer J, Bernabeu R, Somova O, Feskov O, Feskova I, Bezpechnaya I, Zhylkova I, Tishchenko O, Oguic SK, Baldani DP, Skrgatic L, Simunic V, Vrcic H, Rogic D, Juras J, Goldstein MS, Garcia De Miguel L, Campo MC, Gurria A, Alonso J, Serrano A, Marban E, Peregrin PC, Hourvitz A, Shalev L, Yung Y, Yerushalmi G, Giovanni C, Dal Canto M, Fadini R, Has J, Maman E, Monterde M, Gomez R, Marzal A, Vega O, Rubio JM, Diaz-Garcia C, Pellicer A, Eapen A, Datta A, Kurinchi-selvan A, Birch H, Lockwood GM, Ornek MC, Ates U, Usta T, Goksedef CP, Bruszczynska A, Glowacka J, Kunicki M, Jakiel G, Wasniewski T, Jaguszewska K, Liss J, Lukaszuk K, Oehninger S, Nelson S, Verweij P, Stegmann B, Ando H, Takayanagi T, Minamoto H, Suzuki N, Maman E, Rubinshtein N, Yung Y, Shalev L, Yerushalmi G, Hourvitz A, Saltek S, Demir B, Dilbaz B, Demirtas C, Kutteh W, Shapiro B, Witjes H, Gordon K, Lauritsen MP, Loft A, Pinborg A, Freiesleben NL, Mikkelsen AL, Bjerge MR, Andersen AN, Chakraborty P, Goswami SK, Chakravarty BN, Mittal M, Bajoria R, Narvekar N, Chatterjee R, Bentzen JG, Johannsen TH, Scheike T, Andersen AN, Friis-Hansen L, Sunkara S, Coomarasamy A, Faris R, Braude P, Khalaf Y, Makedos A, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Masouridou S, Chatzimeletiou K, Zepiridis L, Mitsoli A, Lainas G, Sfontouris I, Tzamtzoglou A, Kyrou D, Lainas T, Tarlatzis BC, Fermin A, Crisol L, Exposito A, Prieto B, Mendoza R, Matorras R, Louwers Y, Lao O, Kayser M, Palumbo A, Sanabria V, Rouleau JP, Puopolo M, Hernandez MJ, Diaz-Garcia C, Monterde M, Marzal A, Vega O, Rubio JM, Gomez R, Pellicer A, Ozturk S, Sozen B, Yaba-Ucar A, Mutlu D, Demir N, Olsson H, Sandstrom R, Grundemar L, Papaleo E, Corti L, Rabellotti E, Vanni VS, Potenza M, Molgora M, Vigano P, Candiani M, Andersen AN, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Bosch E, Visnova H, Barri P, Garcia-Velasco JA, De Sutter P, Fauser BJCM, Arce JC, Sandstrom R, Olsson H, Grundemar L, Peluso P, Trevisan CM, Cordts EB, Cavalcanti V, Christofolini DM, Fonseca FA, Barbosa CP, Bianco B, Bakas P, Vlahos N, Hassiakos D, Tzanakaki D, Gregoriou O, Liapis A, Creatsas G, Adda-Herzog E, Steffann J, Sebag-Peyrelevade S, Poulain M, Benachi A, Fanchin R, Gordon K, Zhang D, Andersen AN, Aybar F, Temel S, Kahraman S, Hamdine O, Macklon NS, Eijkemans MJC, Laven JS, Cohlen BJ, Verhoeff A, van Dop PA, Bernardus RE, Lambalk CB, Oosterhuis GJE, Holleboom CAG, van den Dool-Maasland GC, Verburg HJ, van der Heijden PFM, Blankhart A, Fauser BCJM, Broekmans FJ, Bhattacharya J, Mitra A, Dutta GB, Kundu A, Bhattacharya M, Kundu S, Pigny P, Dassonneville A, Catteau-Jonard S, Decanter C, Dewailly D, Pouly J, Olivennes F, Massin N, Celle M, Caizergues N, Fleming R, Gaudoin M, Messow M, McConnachie A, Nelson SM, Dewailly D, Vanhove L, Peigne M, Thomas P, Robin G, Catteau-Jonard S. Reproductive endocrinology. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
17
|
Papadopoulos S, Venetis CA, Grimbizis G, Tarlatzis BC, Rustamov O, Krishnan M, Roberts S, Fitzgerald C, Calis PT, Sokmensuer LK, Bozdag G, Fauser B, Oliver J, Loumaye E, Kozachenko I, Adamyan L, Makyan Z. Session 71: Surgery. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
18
|
M. Kolibianakis E, A. Venetis C, Bontis J, C. Tarlatzis B. Significantly Lower Pregnancy Rates in the Presence of Progesterone Elevation in Patients Treated with GnRH Antagonists and Gonadotrophins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2012; 13:464-70. [DOI: 10.2174/138920112799361927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2010] [Accepted: 10/30/2010] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
19
|
Zorba E, Vavilis D, Venetis CA, Zournatzi V, Kellartzis D, Tarlatzis BC. Visfatin serum levels are increased in women with preeclampsia: A case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25:1668-73. [DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2012.657275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
20
|
Bosdou JK, Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Toulis KA, Goulis DG, Zepiridis L, Tarlatzis BC. The use of androgens or androgen-modulating agents in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18:127-45. [PMID: 22307331 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the role of androgens or androgen-modulating agents on the probability of pregnancy achievement in poor responders undergoing IVF. METHODS Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched for the identification of randomized controlled trials evaluating the administration of testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), aromatase inhibitors, recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) and recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (rhCG) before or during ovarian stimulation of poor responders. RESULTS In two trials involving 163 patients, pretreatment with transdermal testosterone was associated with an increase in clinical pregnancy [risk difference (RD): +15%, 95% confidence interval (CI): +3 to +26%] and live birth rates (RD: +11%, 95% CI: +0.3 to +22%) in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. No significant differences in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were observed between patients who received DHEA and those who did not. Similarly, (i) the use of aromatase inhibitors, (ii) addition of rLH and (iii) addition of rhCG in poor responders stimulated with rFSH for IVF were not associated with increased clinical pregnancy rates. In the only eligible study that provided data, live birth rate was increased in patients who received rLH when compared with those who did not (RD: +19%, 95% CI:+1 to +36%). CONCLUSIONS Based on the limited available evidence, transdermal testosterone pretreatment seems to increase clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. There is insufficient data to support a beneficial role of rLH, hCG, DHEA or letrozole administration in the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Bosdou
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Colakoglu M, Toy H, Icen MS, Vural M, Mahmoud AS, Yazici F, Buendgen N, Cordes T, Schultze-Mosgau A, Diedrich K, Beyer D, Griesinger G, Oude Loohuis EJ, Nahuis MJ, Bayram N, Hompes PGA, Oosterhuis GJE, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, van Wely M, Nahuis MJ, Oude Loohuis EJ, Kose N, Bayram N, Hompes PGA, Oosterhuis GJE, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, van Wely M, Yaba A, Demir N, Allegra A, Pane A, Marino A, Scaglione P, Ruvolo G, Manno M, Volpes A, Lunger F, Wildt L, Seeber B, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Bosdou J, Toulis K, Goulis DG, Tarlatzi TB, Tarlatzis BC, Franz M, Keck C, Daube S, Pietrowski D, Demir N, Yaba A, Iannetta R, Santos RDS, Lima TP, Giolo F, Iannetta O, Martins WP, Paula FJ, Ferriani RA, Rosa e Silva ACJS, Martinelli CE, Reis RM, Devesa M, Rodriguez I, Coroleu B, Tur R, Gonzalez C, Barri PN, Nardo LG, Mohiyiddeen L, Mulugeta B, McBurney H, Roberts SA, Newman WG, Grynberg M, Lamazou F, Even M, Gallot V, Frydman R, Fanchin R, Abdalla H, Nicopoullos J, Leader A, Pang S, Witjes H, Gordon K, Devroey P, Arrivi C, Ferraretti AP, Magli MC, Tartaglia ML, Fasolino MC, Gianaroli L, Macek sr. M, Feldmar P, Kluckova H, Hrehorcak M, Diblik J, Cernikova J, Paulasova P, Turnovec M, Macek jr. M, Hillensjo T, Yeko T, Witjes H, Elbers J, Devroey P, Mardesic T, Abuzeid M, Witjes H, Mannaerts B, Okubo T, Matsuo R, Kuwayama M, Teramoto S, Chakraborty P, Goswami SK, Chakravarty BN, Nandi SS, Kabir SN, Ramos Vidal J, Prados N, Caligara C, Garcia J, Carranza FJ, Gonzalez-Ravina A, Salazar A, Tocino A, Rodriguez I, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Ito H, Iwasa T, Hasegawa E, Hatano K, Nakayama D, Kazuka M, Usuda S, Isaka K, Ventura V, Doria S, Fernandes S, Barros A, Valkenburg O, Lao O, Schipper I, Louwers YV, Uitterlinden AG, Kayser M, Laven JSE, Sharma S, Goswami S, Goswami SK, Ghosh S, Chattopadhyay R, Sarkar A, Chakravarty BN, Louwers YV, Valkenburg O, Lie Fong S, van Dorp W, de Jong FH, Laven JSE, Ghosh S, Chattopadhyay R, Goswami SK, Radhika KL, Chakravarty BN, Benkhalifa M, Demirol A, Montjeant D, Delagrange P, Gentien D, Giakoumakis G, Menezo Y, Dattilo M, Gurgan T, Engels S, Blockeel C, Haentjens P, De Vos M, Camus M, Devroey P, Dimitraki M, Koutlaki N, Gioka T, Messini CI, Dafopoulos K, Messinis IE, Gurlek B, Batioglu S, Ozyer S, Nafiye Y, Kale I, Karayalcin R, Uncu G, Kasapoglu I, Uncu Y, Celik N, Ozerkan K, Ata B, Ferrero H, Gomez R, Delgado F, Simon C, Gaytan F, Pellicer A, Osborn JC, Fien L, Wolyncevic J, Esler JH, Choi D, Kim N, Choi J, Jo M, Lee E, Lee D, Fujii R, Neyatani N, Waseda T, Oka Y, Takagi H, Tomizawa H, Sasagawa T, Makinoda S, Ajina M, Zorgati H, Ben Salem A, Ben Ali H, Mehri S, Touhami M, Saad A, Piouka A, Karkanaki A, Katsikis I, Delkos D, Mousatat T, Daskalopoulos G, Panidis D, Pantos K, Stavrou D, Sfakianoudis K, Angeli E, Chronopoulou M, Vaxevanoglou T, Jones R GMJ, Lee WD, Kim SD, Jee BC, Kim KC, Kim KH, Kim SH, Kim YJ, Park KA, Chae SJ, Lim KS, Hur CY, Kang YJ, Lee WD, Lim JH, Tomizawa H, Makinoda S, Fujita S, Waseda T, Fujii R, Utsunomiya R T, Vieira C, Martins WP, Fernandes JBF, Soares GM, Reis RM, Silva de Sa MF, Ferriani R RA, Yoo JH, Kim HO, Cha SH, Koong MK, Song IO, Kang IS, Hatakeyama N, Jinno M, Watanabe A, Hirohama J, Hiura R, Konig TE, Beemsterboer SN, Overbeek A, Hendriks ML, Heymans MW, Hompes P, Homburg R, Schats R, Lambalk CB, van der Houwen L, Konig TE, Overbeek A, Hendriks ML, Beemsterboer SN, Kuchenbecker WK, Renckens CNM, Bernardus RE, Schats R, Homburg R, Hompes P, Lambalk CB, Potdar N, Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, de Groot PCM, Dekkers OM, Romijn JA, Dieben SWM, Helmerhorst FM, Guivarch Leveque A, Homer L, Broux PL, Moy L, Priou G, Vialard J, Colleu D, Arvis P, Dewailly D, Aghahosseini M, Aleyasin A, Sarvi F, Safdarian L, Rahmanpour H, Akhtar MA, Navaratnam K, Ankers D, Sharma SD, Son WY, Chung JT, Reinblatt S, Dahan M, Demirtas M, Holzer H, Aspichueta F, Exposito A, Crisol L, Prieto B, Mendoza R, Matorras R, Kim K, Lee J, Jee B, Lee W, Suh C, Moon J, Kim S, Sarapik A, Velthut A, Haller-Kikkatalo K, Faure GC, Bene MC, de Carvalho M, Massin F, Uibo R, Salumets A, Alhalabi M, Samawi S, Taha A, Kafri N, Modi S, Khatib A, Sharif J, Othman A, Hamamah S, Assou S, Anahory T, Loup V, Dechaud H, Dewailly D, Mousavi Fatemi H, Doody K, Witjes H, Mannaerts B, Basconi V, Jungblut L, Young E, Van Thillo G, Paz D, Pustovrh MC, Fabbri R, Pasquinelli G, Magnani V, Macciocca M, Parazza I, Battaglia C, Paradisi R, Venturoli S, Ono M, Teranisi A, Fumino T, Ohama N, Hamai H, Chikawa A, Takata R, Teramura S, Iwahasi K, Shigeta M, Heidari M, Farahpour M, Talebi S, Edalatkhah H, Zarnani AH, Ardekani AM, Pietrowski D, Szabo L, Sator M, Just A, Franz M, Egarter C, Hope N, Motteram C, Rombauts LJ, Lee W, Chang E, Han J, Won H, Yoon T, Seok H, Diao FY, Mao YD, Wang W, Ding W, Liu JY, Chang E, Yoon T, Lee W, Cho J, Kwak I, Kim Y, Afshan I, Cartwright R, Trew G, Lavery S, Lockwood G, Niyani K, Banerjee S, Chambers A, Pados G, Tsolakidis D, Billi H, Athanatos D, Tarlatzis B, Salumets A, Laanpere M, Altmae S, Kaart T, Stavreus-Evers A, Nilsson TK, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van der Stroom E, Konig TE, van Montfrans J, Overbeek A, van den Berg MH, van Leeuwen FE, Lambalk CB, Taketani T, Tamura H, Tamura I, Asada H, Sugino N, Al - Azemi M, Kyrou D, Papanikolaou EG, Polyzos NP, Devroey P, Fatemi HM, Qiu Z, Yang L, Yan G, Sun H, Hu Y, Mohiyiddeen L, Higgs J, Roberts S, Newman W, Nardo LG, Ho C, Guijarro JA, Nunez R, Alonso J, Garcia A, Cordeo C, Cortes S, Caballero P, Soliman S, Baydoun R, Wang B, Shreeve N, Cagampang F, Sadek K, Hill CM, Brook N, Macklon N, Cheong Y, Santana R, Setti AS, Maldonado LG, Valente FM, Iaconelli C, Braga DPAF, Iaconelli Jr. A, Borges Jr. E, Yoon JS, Won MY, Kim SD, Jung JH, Yang SH, Lim JH, Kavrut M, Kahraman S, Sadek KH, Bruce KB, Macklon N, Cagampang FR, Cheong YC, Cota AMM, Oliveira JBA, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Massaro FC, Silva LFI, Vagnini LD, Nicoletti A, Pontes A, Cavagna M, Baruffi RLR, Franco Jr. JG, Won MY, Kim SD, Yoon JS, Jung JH, Yang SH, Lim JH, Kim SD, Kim JW, Yoon TK, Lee WS, Han JE, Lyu SW, Shim SH, Kuwabara Y, Katayama A, Tomiyama R, Piao H, Ono S, Shibui Y, Abe T, Ichikawa T, Mine K, Akira S, Takeshita T, Hatzi E, Lazaros L, Xita N, Kaponis A, Makrydimas G, Sofikitis N, Stefos T, Zikopoulos K, Georgiou I, Guimera M, Casals G, Fabregues F, Estanyol JM, Balasch J, Mochtar MH, Van den Wijngaard L, Van Voorst S, Koks CAM, Van Mello NM, Mol BWJ, Van der Veen F, Van Wely M, Fabregues F, Iraola A, Casals G, Creus M, Carmona F, Balasch J, Villarroel C, Lopez P, Merino P, Iniguez G, Codner E, Xu B, Cui Y, Gao L, Xue KAI, Li MEI, Zhang YUAN, Diao F, Ma X, Liu J, Leonhardt H, Gull B, Kishimoto K, Kataoka M, Stener-Victorin E, Hellstrom M, Cui Y, Wang X, Zhang Z, Ding G, HU X, Sha J, Zhou Z, Liu J, Liu J, Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Fatemi HM, Camus M, Tournaye H, Tarlatzis BC, Devroey P, Davari F, Rashidi B, Rahmanpour Zanjani H, Al-Inany H, Youssef M, Aboulghar M, Broekmans F, Sterrenburg M, Smit J, Abousetta A, Van Dessel H, Van Leeuwen J, McGee EA, Bodri D, Guillen JJ, Rodriguez A, Trullenque M, Coll O, Vernaeve V, Snajderova M, Keslova P, Sedlacek P, Formankova R, Kotaska K, Stary J, Weghofer A, Dietrich W, Barad DH, Gleicher N, Rustamov O, Pemberton P, Roberts S, Smith A, Yates A, Patchava S, Nardo L, Toulis KA, Mintziori G, Goulis DG, Kintiraki E, Eukarpidis E, Mouratoglou SA, Pavlaki A, Stergianos S, Poulasouhidou M, Tzellos TG, Tarlatzis BC, Nasiri R, Ramezanzadeh F, Sarafraz Yazdi M, Baghrei M, Lee RKK, Wu FS, Lin S, Lin MH, Hwu YM. POSTER VIEWING SESSION - REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY. Hum Reprod 2011. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/26.s1.90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
23
|
Boivin J, Griffiths E, Venetis CA. Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ 2011; 342:d223. [PMID: 21345903 PMCID: PMC3043530 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 209] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine whether pretreatment emotional distress in women is associated with achievement of pregnancy after a cycle of assisted reproductive technology. DESIGN Meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, PsychNET, ISI Web of Knowledge, and ISI Web of Science were searched for articles published from 1985 to March 2010 (inclusive). We also undertook a hand search of reference lists and contacted 29 authors. Eligible studies were prospective studies reporting a test of the association between pretreatment emotional distress (anxiety or depression) and pregnancy in women undergoing a single cycle of assisted reproductive technology. Review methods Two authors independently assessed the studies for eligibility and quality (using criteria adapted from the Newcastle-Ottawa quality scale) and extracted data. Authors contributed additional data not included in original publication. RESULTS Fourteen studies with 3583 infertile women undergoing a cycle of fertility treatment were included in the meta-analysis. The effect size used was the standardised mean difference (adjusted for small sample size) in pretreatment anxiety or depression (priority on anxiety where both measured) between women who achieved a pregnancy (defined as a positive pregnancy test, positive fetal heart scan, or live birth) and those who did not. Pretreatment emotional distress was not associated with treatment outcome after a cycle of assisted reproductive technology (standardised mean difference -0.04, 95% confidence interval -0.11 to 0.03 (fixed effects model); heterogeneity I²=14%, P=0.30). Subgroup analyses according to previous experience of assisted reproductive technology, composition of the not pregnant group, and timing of the emotional assessment were not significant. The effect size did not vary according to study quality, but a significant subgroup analysis on timing of the pregnancy test, a contour enhanced funnel plot, and Egger's test indicated the presence of moderate publication bias. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this meta-analysis should reassure women and doctors that emotional distress caused by fertility problems or other life events co-occurring with treatment will not compromise the chance of becoming pregnant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Boivin
- Cardiff Fertility Studies Research Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Ahlstrom A, Westin C, Wikland M, Hardarson T, Mitsoli A, Kolibianakis EM, Loutradi K, Venetis CA, Triantafilidis S, Makedos A, Chatzimeletiou K, Zepiridis L, Bili H, Pados G, Tzamtzoglou A, Tarlatzis BC, Musters A, Wely van M, Verhoeve H, Repping S, Veen van der F, Mochtar MH, Menezes J, Sjoblom P, Tristen C, Wramsby H, Ivec M, Kovacic B, Vlaisavljevic V, Ghoshdastidar S, Ghoshdastidar B, Chakraborty C. SELECTED ORAL COMMUNICATION SESSION, SESSION 02: EMBRYOLOGY - QUALITY AND DEVELOPMENT Monday 4 July 2011 10:00 - 11:30. Hum Reprod 2011. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/26.s1.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
26
|
Nagy ZP, Chang CC, Kahn J, Bernal DP, Shapiro DB, Toledo AA, Kort HI, Murray J, Campbell BK, Raine-Fenning N, Jayaprakasan K, Hauzman EE, Bodri D, Guillen JJ, Vidal R, Coll O, Vernaeve V, Linara E, Smith VJH, Nair S, Arian-Schad M, Ahuja KK, Goutziomitrou E, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Masouridou S, Makedos A, Grimbizis G, Parlapani A, Chatzimeletiou K, Mitsoli A, Tarlatzi TB, Tarlatzis BC, van Peperstraten AM, Kreuwel IAM, Hulscher ME, Kremer JAM, Grol RPTM, Nelen WLDM, Hermens RPMG, Igarashi S, Izuchi S, Sugisita Y, Okutsu Y, Nakamura S, Tamura M, Suzuki N, Ishizuka B. SELECTED ORAL COMMUNICATION SESSION, SESSION 61: FEMALE FERTILITY Wednesday 6 July 2011 10:00 - 11:45. Hum Reprod 2011. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/26.s1.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
27
|
Toulis KA, Iliadou PK, Venetis CA, Tsametis C, Tarlatzis BC, Papadimas I, Goulis DG. Inhibin B and anti-Mullerian hormone as markers of persistent spermatogenesis in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16:713-724. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmq024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
|
28
|
Maldonado L, Azjen SA, Aoki T, Busato W, Pasqualotto FF, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Aflatoonian A, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, Oskouian L, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Diedrich K, Tarlatzis BC, Griesinger G, Lehert P, Ezcurra D, Guzeloglu Kayisli O, Lalioti M, Sasson I, Sakkas D, Aydiner F, Seli E, Almeida H, Ribeiro A, Pinto A, Gomes F, Silva-Carvalho JL, Porrati L, Vilela M, Viglierchio MI, Valcarcel A, Lombardi E, Marconi G. Session 64: Clinical Art 2. Hum Reprod 2010. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/de.25.s1.64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
29
|
Fujii R, Fujita S, Waseda T, Oka Y, Takagi H, Tomizawa H, Sasagawa T, Makinoda S, Cavagna M, Braga DPAF, Figueira RCS, Aoki T, Maldonado LGL, Iaconelli A, Borges E, Prabhakar S, Dittrich R, Beckmann MW, Hoffmann I, Mueller A, Kjotrod S, Carlsen SM, Rasmussen PE, Holst-Larsen T, Mellembakken J, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Haapaniemi Kouru K, Morin Papunen L, Humaidan P, Sunde A, von During V, Pappalardo S, Valeri C, Crescenzi F, Manna C, Sallam HN, Polec A, Raki M, Tanbo T, Abyholm T, Fedorcsak P, Tabanelli C, Ferraretti AP, Feliciani E, Magli MC, Fasolino C, Gianaroli L, Wang T, Feng C, Song Y, Dong MY, Sheng JZ, Huang HF, Sayyah Melli M, Kazemi-shishvan M, Snajderova M, Zemkova D, Pechova M, Teslik L, Lanska V, Ketel I, Serne E, Stehouwer C, Korsen T, Hompes P, Smulders Y, Voorstemans L, Homburg R, Lambalk C, Bellver J, Martinez-Conejero JA, Pellicer A, Labarta E, Alama P, Melo MAB, Horcajadas JA, Agirregoitia N, Peralta L, Mendoza R, Exposito A, Matorras R, Agirregoitia E, Ajina M, Chaouache N, Gaddas M, Souissi A, Tabka Z, Saad A, Zaouali-Ajina M, Zbidi A, Eguchi N, Jinno M, Watanabe A, Hirohama J, Hatakeyama N, Choi YM, Kim JJ, Kim DH, Yoon SH, Ku SY, Kim SH, Kim JG, Lee KS, Moon SY, Hirohama J, Jinno M, Watanabe A, Eguchi N, Hatakeyama N, Jinno M, Watanabe A, Hirohama J, Eguchi N, Hatakeyama N, Xiong Y, Liang X, Li Y, Yang X, Wei L, Makinoda S, Tomizawa H, Fujita S, Takagi H, Oka Y, Waseda T, Sasagawa T, Fujii R, Utsunomiya T, Chu S, Li P, Akarsu S, Dirican EK, Akin KO, Kormaz C, Goktolga U, Ceyhan ST, Kara C, Nadamoto K, Tarui S, Ida M, Sugihara K, Haruki A, Hukuda A, Morimoto Y, Albu A, Albu D, Sandu L, Kong G, Cheung L, Lok I, Pinto A, Teixeira L, Figueiredo H, Pires I, Silva Carvalho JL, Pereira ML, Faut M, de Zuniga I, Colaci D, Barrios E, Oubina A, Terrado Gil G, Motta A, Colaci D, de Zuniga I, Horton M, Faut M, Sobral F, Gomez Pena M, Motta A, Gleicher N, Barad DH, Li YP, Zhao HC, Spaczynski RZ, Guzik P, Banaszewska B, Krauze T, Wykretowicz A, Wysocki H, Pawelczyk L, Sarikaya E, Gulerman C, Cicek N, Mollamahmutoglu L, Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Toulis K, Goulis D, Loutradi K, Chatzimeletiou K, Papadimas I, Bontis I, Tarlatzis BC, Schultze-Mosgau A, Griesinger G, Schoepper B, Cordes T, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S, Gomez R, Jovanovic V, Sauer CM, Shawber CJ, Sauer MV, Kitajewski J, Zimmermann RC, Bungum L, Jacobsson AK, Rosen F, Becker C, Andersen CY, Guner N, Giwercman A, Kiapekou E, Zapanti E, Boukelatou D, Mavreli T, Bletsa R, Stefanidis K, Drakakis P, Mastorakos G, Loutradis D, Malhotra N, Sharma V, Kumar S, Roy KK, Sharma JB, Ferraretti A, Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Crippa A, Stanghellini I, Robles F, Serdynska-Szuster M, Spaczynski RZ, Banaszewska B, Pawelczyk L, Kristensen SL, Ernst E, Toft G, Olsen SF, Bonde JP, Vested A, Ramlau-Hansen CH, Wang FF, Qu F, Ding GL, Huang HF, Gallot V, Genro V, Roux I, Scheffer JB, Frydman R, Fanchin R, Kanta Goswami S, Banerjee S, Chakravarty BN, Kabir SN, Seeber BE, Morandell E, Kurzthaler D, Wildt L, Dieplinger H, Tutuncu L, Bodur S, Dundar O, Ron - El R, Seger R, Komarovsky D, Kasterstein E, Komsky A, Maslansky B, Strassburger D, Ben-Ami I, Zhao XM, Ni RM, Lin L, Dong M, Tu CH, He ZH, Yang DZ, Karamalegos C, Polidoropoulos N, Papanikopoulos C, Stefanis P, Argyrou M, Doriza S, Sisi V, Moschopoulou M, Karagianni T, Mentorou C, Economou K, Davies S, Mastrominas M, Gougeon A, De Los Santos MJ, Garcia-Laez V, Martinez-Conejero JA, Horcajadas JA, Esteban F, Labarta E, Crespo J, Pellicer A, Li HWR, Anderson RA, Yeung WSB, Ho PC, Ng EHY, Yang HI, Lee KE, Seo SK, Kim HY, Cho SH, Choi YS, Lee BS, Park KH, Cho DJ, Hart R, Doherty D, Mori T, Hickey M, Sloboda D, Norman R, Huang RC, Beilin L, Freiesleben N, Lossl K, Johannsen TH, Loft A, Bangsboll S, Hougaard D, Friis-Hansen L, Christiansen M, Nyboe Andersen A, Thum MY, Abdalla H, Martinez-Salazar J, De la Fuente G, Kohls G, Pellicer A, Garcia Velasco JA, Yasmin E, Kukreja S, Barth J, Balen AH, Esra T, Var T, Citil A, Dogan M, Cicek N, Messini CI, Dafopoulos K, Chalvatzas N, Georgoulias P, Anifandis G, Messinis IE, Celik O, Hascalik S, Celik N, Sahin I, Aydin S, Hanna CW, Bretherick KL, Liu CC, Stephenson MD, Robinson WP, Louwers YV, Goodarzi MO, Taylor KD, Jones MR, Cui J, Kwon S, Chen YDI, Guo X, Stolk L, Uitterlinden AG, Laven JSE, Azziz R, Navaratnarajah R, Grun B, Sinclair J, Dafou D, Gayther S, Timms JF, Hardiman PJ, Ye Y, Wu R, Ou J, Kim SD, Jee BC, Lee JY, Suh CS, Kim SH, Jung JH, Moon SY, Opmeer BC, Broeze KA, Coppus SF, Collins JA, Den Hartog JE, Land JA, Van der Linden PJ, Marianowski P, Ng E, Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Strandell A, Mol BW, Tarlatzi TB, Kyrou D, Mertzanidou A, Fatemi HM, Tarlatzis BC, Devroey P, Batenburg TE, Konig TE, Overbeek A, Hompes P, Schats R, Lambalk CB, Carone D, Vizziello G, Vitti A, Chiappetta R, Topcu HO, Yuksel B, Islimye M, Karakaya J, ozat M, Batioglu S, Kuchenbecker WK, Groen H, Bolster JH, van Asselt S, Wolffenbuettel BH, Land JA, Hoek A, Wu Y, Pan H, Chen X, Wang T, Huang H, Zavos A, Dafopoulos K, Georgoulias P, Messini CI, Verikouki C, Messinis IE, Van Os L, Vink-Ranti CQJ, Rijnders PM, Tucker KE, Jansen CAM, Lucco F, Pozzobon C, Lara E, Galliano D, Pellicer A, Ballesteros A, Ghoshdastidar B, Maity SP, Ghoshdastidar B, Ghoshdastidar S, Luna M, Vela G, Sandler B, Barritt J, Flisser ED, Copperman AB, Nogueira D, Prat L, Degoy J, Bonald F, Montagut J, Ghoshdastidar S, Maity S, Ghoshdastidar B, Chen S, Chen X, Luo C, Zhen H, Shi X, Wu F, Ni Y, Merdassi G, Chaker A, Kacem K, Benmeftah M, Fourati S, Wahabi D, Zhioua F, Zhioua A, Saini P, Saini A, Sugiyama R, Nakagawa K, Nishi Y, Jyuen H, Kuribayashi Y, Sugiyama R, Inoue M, Jancar N, Vrtacnik Bokal E, Virant-Klun I, Lee JH, Kim SG, Cha EM, Park IH, Lee KH, Dahdouh EM, Desrosiers P, St-Michel P, Villeneuve M, Fontaine JY, Granger L, Ramon O, Matorras R, Burgos J, Abanto E, Gonzalez M, Mugica J, Corcostegui B, Exposito A, Tal J, Ziskind G, Ohel G, Paltieli Y, Paz G, Lewit N, Sendel H, Khouri S, Calderon I, van Gelder P, Al-Inany HG, Antaki R, Dean N, Lapensee L, Racicot M, Menard S, Kadoch I, Meylaerts LJ, Dreesen L, Vandersteen M, Neumann C, Zollner U, Kato K, Segawa T, Kawachiya S, Okuno T, Kobayashi T, Takehara Y, Kato O, Jayaprakasan K, Nardo L, Hopkisson J, Campbell B, Raine-Fenning N. Posters * Reproductive Endocrinology (i.e. PCOS, Menarche, Menopause etc.). Hum Reprod 2010. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/de.25.s1.438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
30
|
Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Miliaras D, Theodoridis T, Tzevelekis F, Bontis J, Tarlatzis BC. Steroid receptor expression in human endometrium during the follicular phase of stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:2931-5. [PMID: 19640894 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No data are currently available regarding kinetics of human endometrial steroid receptors in stimulated cycles. METHODS In 31 patients (age <39 years) stimulated with gonadotrophins and GnRH antagonists for intrauterine insemination (IUI) an endometrial biopsy was performed on the first day after the end of menstruation and a second biopsy was performed two (Group 0 + 2, n = 10) or four (Group 0 + 4, n = 11) days after the first biopsy, or on the day of hCG administration (Group 0 + hCG, n = 10). Expression of progesterone (PR) and estrogen (ER) receptor was investigated by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS PR and ER levels were significantly increased in the second versus the first biopsy, in all groups analyzed (P = 0.01), in both stromal and glandular cells. Between the three groups compared, a significant increase in PR expression was observed for glandular cells (P = 0.03), with the highest value observed in Group 0 + 4. Moreover, the increase in PR expression in stromal cells differed between groups (P = 0.01), with the highest value observed in the Group 0 + hCG. CONCLUSIONS In stimulated cycles for IUI, ER expression in both glandular and stromal endometrial cells, after an initial increase, does not appear to change significantly during the follicular phase. On the contrary, during the same period of time, following an initial rise, PR expression in glandular and stromal cells continues to increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Kyrou
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Diedrich K, Tarlatzis BC, Griesinger G. Addition of growth hormone to gonadotrophins in ovarian stimulation of poor responders treated by in-vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2009; 15:613-22. [PMID: 19561136 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmp026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether the addition of growth hormone (GH) can improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has been examined to date by several underpowered studies, which have not provided solid conclusions. METHODS A computerized literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and randomized controlled trial (RCT) registries was performed independently by two reviewers, aiming to identify RCTs that evaluated the following research question: does GH addition increase the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF? RESULTS Six relevant RCTs were identified, including a total of 169 patients. GH addition significantly increased clinical pregnancy (rate difference: +16%, 95% CI: +4 to +28; fixed effects model) (number-needed-to-treat (NNT) = 6, 95% CI: 4-25) and live birth rates (rate difference: +17%, 95% CI: +5 to +30; fixed effects model) (NNT = 6; 95% CI: 3-20). Furthermore, GH addition was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients reaching embryo transfer (rate difference: +22%, 95% CI: +7 to +36; fixed effects model). CONCLUSIONS The present meta-analysis provides evidence that GH addition increases the probability of clinical pregnancy and live birth in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF. However, the total number of patients analyzed is small and thus further RCTs are warranted to prove or disprove this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Kolibianakis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Nea Efkarpia Peripheral Road, Thessaloniki 54603, Greece.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC. Role of the endocrine profile for the achievement of pregnancy with IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18 Suppl 2:37-43. [DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60447-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
33
|
Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Tarlatzis BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: facts and fiction. Hum Reprod Update 2008; 14:538. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmn027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
34
|
Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Papanikolaou E, Bontis J, Devroey P, Tarlatzis BC. Is progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration associated with the probability of pregnancy in in vitro fertilization? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13:343-55. [PMID: 17405832 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmm007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of progesterone elevation on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome has remained a debatable issue for several years. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate whether progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration is associated with the probability of pregnancy. Eligible studies were considered those in which patients did not participate more than once. A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL identified 12 eligible studies, 10 of which were retrospective. The majority (n = 10) of these studies did not detect a statistically significant association between progesterone elevation and the probability of pregnancy. Meta-analysis was performed only for the studies (n = 5) that provided data on clinical pregnancy per patient reaching hCG administration for final oocyte maturation. No statistically significant association between progesterone elevation and the probability of clinical pregnancy was detected (Odds ratio: 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.06; P = 0.10). This finding persisted in the sensitivity analyses performed, which excluded the studies that did not report clearly that measurement of progesterone did not affect patients' management and those that did not report definition of clinical pregnancy. In addition, subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of type of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone GnRH analogue used and on the value of serum threshold used to classify patients in those with or without progesterone elevation. These analyses, however, did not materially change the results obtained. In conclusion, the best available evidence does not support an association between progesterone elevation on the day of hCG administration and the probability of clinical pregnancy in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Venetis
- Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Papageoriou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Nea Efkarpia, Peripheral Road, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kremastinos DT, Toutouzas PK, Vyssoulis GP, Venetis CA, Vretou HP, Avgoustakis DG. Global and segmental left ventricular function in beta-thalassemia. Cardiology 1985; 72:129-39. [PMID: 3995517 DOI: 10.1159/000173853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) function was studied by M-mode echocardiography in 60 patients with beta-thalassemia (mean age +/- SD, 17.1 +/- 7.5 years) and 30 healthy controls (15.4 +/- 3.8 years). In thalassemic patients, echocardiograms were obtained 48 h posttransfusion, with a mean hemoglobin level of 12.4 +/- 0.9 g/dl. To examination time, thalassemic patients had received 30-774 blood units (318 +/- 176). Congestive heart failure (CHF) was present in 14 thalassemic patients (19.6 +/- 3.4 years), while 46 (16.3 +/- 8.2 years) had no clinical signs of CHF. Global LV function study showed enlarged LV dimensions in thalassemic patients with CHF (p less than 0.001) and similar cavity size in controls and patients without CHF (p = NS). The same was true for velocity measurements, while diastolic LV indices had similar values in all groups (p = NS). Segmental LV function study showed no significant differences in systolic and diastolic LV posterior wall behavior between thalassemic patients and controls, and even more, between thalassemic patients with and without CHF, while it was independent of iron load. These findings indicate that global and segmental LV function in thalassemic patients remain within normal limits until the final stages of the disease. CHF onset marks the deterioration of LV systolic performance, while global and segmental diastolic indices do not change significantly. The above findings question the role of iron overload in the development of CHF in beta-thalassemia.
Collapse
|