Bridging the age gap in breast cancer: impact of omission of breast cancer surgery in older women with oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer on quality-of-life outcomes

BACKGROUND

Primary endocrine therapy may be an alternative treatment for less fit women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. This study compared quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes in older women treated with surgery or primary endocrine therapy.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of surgery or primary endocrine therapy in women aged over 70 years with operable breast cancer. QoL was assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of cancer QoL questionnaires QLQ-C30, -BR23, and -ELD14, and the EuroQol Five Dimensions 5L score at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for baseline variation in health, fitness, and tumour stage.

RESULTS

The study recruited 3416 women (median age 77 (range 69-102) years) from 56 breast units. Of these, 2979 (87.2 per cent) had ER-positive breast cancer; 2354 women had surgery and 500 received primary endocrine therapy (125 were excluded from analysis due to inadequate data or non-standard therapy). Median follow-up was 52 months. The primary endocrine therapy group was older and less fit. Baseline QoL differed between the groups; the mean(s.d.) QLQ-C30 global health status score was 66.2(21.1) in patients who received primary endocrine therapy versus 77.1(17.8) among those who had surgery plus endocrine therapy. In the unmatched analysis, changes in QoL between 6 weeks and baseline were noted in several domains, but by 24 months most scores had returned to baseline levels. In the matched analysis, major surgery (mastectomy or axillary clearance) had a more pronounced adverse impact than primary endocrine therapy in several domains.

CONCLUSION

Adverse effects on QoL are seen in the first few months after surgery, but by 24 months these have largely resolved. Women considering surgery should be informed of these effects.

Breast Angiosarcoma Surveillance Study: UK national audit of management and outcomes of angiosarcoma of the breast and chest wall

BACKGROUND

Breast angiosarcomas are rare tumours of vascular origin. Secondary angiosarcoma occurs following radiotherapy for breast cancer. Angiosarcomas have high recurrence and poor survival rates. This is concerning owing to the increasing use of adjuvant radiotherapy for the treatment of invasive breast cancer and ductal cancer in situ (DCIS), which could explain the rising incidence of angiosarcoma. Outcome data are limited and provide a poor evidence base for treatment. This paper presents a national, trainee-led, retrospective, multicentre study of a large angiosarcoma cohort.

METHODS

Data for patients with a diagnosis of breast/chest wall angiosarcoma between 2000 and 2015 were collected retrospectively from 15 centres.

RESULTS

The cohort included 183 patients with 34 primary and 149 secondary angiosarcomas. Median latency from breast cancer to secondary angiosarcoma was 6 years. Only 78.9 per cent of patients were discussed at a sarcoma multidisciplinary team meeting. Rates of recurrence were high with 14 of 28 (50 per cent ) recurrences in patients with primary and 80 of 124 (64.5 per cent ) in those with secondary angiosarcoma at 5 years. Many patients had multiple recurrences: total of 94 recurrences in 162 patients (58.0 per cent). Median survival was 5 (range 0-16) years for patients with primary and 5 (0-15) years for those with secondary angiosarcoma. Development of secondary angiosarcoma had a negative impact on predicted breast cancer survival, with a median 10-year PREDICT prognostic rate of 69.6 per cent, compared with 54.0 per cent in the observed cohort.

CONCLUSION

A detrimental impact of secondary angiosarcoma on breast cancer survival has been demonstrated. Although not statistically significant, almost all excess deaths were attributable to angiosarcoma. The increased use of adjuvant radiotherapy to treat low-risk breast cancer and DCIS is a cause for concern and warrants further study.

Innovations for the future of breast surgery

BACKGROUND

Future innovations in science and technology with an impact on multimodal breast cancer management from a surgical perspective are discussed in this narrative review. The work was undertaken in response to the Commission on the Future of Surgery project initiated by the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

METHODS

Expert opinion was sought around themes of surgical de-escalation, reduction in treatment morbidities, and improving the accuracy of breast-conserving surgery in terms of margin status. There was emphasis on how the primacy of surgical excision in an era of oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery is increasingly being challenged, with more effective systemic therapies that target residual disease burden, and permit response-adapted approaches to both breast and axillary surgery.

RESULTS

Technologies for intraoperative margin assessment can potentially half re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery, and sentinel lymph node biopsy will become a therapeutic procedure for many patients with node-positive disease treated either with surgery or chemotherapy as the primary modality. Genomic profiling of tumours can aid in the selection of patients for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies as well as prevention strategies. Molecular subtypes are predictive of response to induction therapies and reductive approaches to surgery in the breast or axilla.

CONCLUSION

Treatments are increasingly being tailored and based on improved understanding of tumour biology and relevant biomarkers to determine absolute benefit and permit delivery of cost-effective healthcare. Patient involvement is crucial for breast cancer studies to ensure relevance and outcome measures that are objective, meaningful, and patient-centred.

O77: DOES MESH IMPROVE PATIENT SATISFACTION AND HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER IMPLANT-BASED BREAST RECONSTRUCTION? A MULTICENTRE PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Introduction

Biological and synthetic meshes may improve outcomes of immediate IBBR by facilitating single-stage direct-to-implant procedures. However, high-quality supporting evidence is limited, particularly regarding PROs.

Method

2108 consecutive women undergoing IBBR at 81 centres were prospectively recruited between 2014-2016. Demographic, operative, oncological and 3-month complication data were collected. An 18-month questionnaire assessed PROs using the validated BREAST-Q and a five-point Likert scale rating of overall reconstructive outcome.

The impacts of different IBBR techniques on PROs were explored using mixed-effects regression models adjusted for clinically-relevant confounders and including a random effect to account for clustering by centre. The reference group was two- stage submuscular reconstruction without mesh.

Result

1470 participants consented to receive the questionnaire and 891 completed it. 67 patients underwent two-stage submuscular reconstruction; 764 patients received subpectoral reconstructions with biological mesh (n=495) synthetic mesh (n=95) or dermal sling (n=174). 14 patients underwent prepectoral reconstructions (introduced late in the study).

Compared with two-stage reconstructions, no differences in PROs were seen in biological or synthetic mesh-assisted or dermal sling procedures (p>0.05). However, prepectoral IBBR patients reported better satisfaction with breasts (difference=6.63, 95% confidence interval[1.65–11.61], p=0.009). Outcomes were similar to those in the NMBRA 2008/9 cohort, which included submuscular procedures only.

Conclusion

This study does not suggest that mesh improves PROs of IBBR. It provides early data supporting improved satisfaction with breasts following prepectoral reconstructions. Future trials are needed to robustly evaluate prepectoral techniques.

Abbrev

IBBR: implant-based breast reconstruction, PRO: patient-reported outcome, NMBRA: National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit

Take-home message

Although mesh-assisted techniques have become widely adopted, this large, prospective, multicentre cohort study does not suggest that mesh improves patient-reported outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction compared with standard submuscular techniques. However, it provides early data to support improved satisfaction with breasts in the prepectoral setting, which now requires robust evaluation.

O58: THE IMPACT OF RADIOTHERAPY ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT-BASED BREAST RECONSTRUCTION: RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRE COHORT STUDY

Introduction

Post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is increasing given to improve breast cancer outcomes but can increase complication rates following implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). Little, however, is known about the impact of PMRT on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of IBBR, especially in the context of mesh-assisted techniques.

Method

2108 consecutive women undergoing IBBR at 81 UK centres were prospectively recruited between 2014 and 2016. Demographic, operative, oncological and 3-month complication data were collected, and patients who consented received post-operative questionnaires. An 18-month questionnaire assessed PROs using the validated BREAST-Q. The effect of IBBR on PROs was investigated using mixed-effects regression models adjusted for clinically relevant confounders and including a random effect to account for potential clustering by centre.

Result

1693 iBRA participants underwent mastectomy for malignancy, of whom 1187 (70%) consented to receive the 18-month questionnaire and 732 (43%) completed it. Patients undergoing PMRT (n=214) reported significantly worse scores across 3 BREAST-Q domains: satisfaction with breasts (-6.27 points, p=0.008, 95% confidence interval (CI)[-10.91,-1.63]), satisfaction with outcome (-7.53 points, p=0.002, CI[-12.20,-2.85]) and physical well-being (-6.55 points, p<0.001, CI[-9.43,-3.67]). Overall satisfaction was worse in the PMRT group (OR 0.497, p=0.002, CI[0.32,0.77]). Use of biological mesh did not ameliorate the impact of PMRT on patient satisfaction (interaction term p-values [0.173 - 0.826]).

Conclusion:

PMRT adversely affects PROs of IBBR. This should be discussed with patients considering IBBR, especially if PMRT is anticipated or indications are borderline, to enable informed decisions regarding oncological and reconstructive options.

Abbrev

PMRT: post-mastectomy radiotherapy, PRO: patient-reported outcome

Take-home message

This multicentre, prospective cohort study of 732 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction demonstrates worse 18-month patient-reported outcomes in women who received post-mastectomy radiotherapy than those who did not. These data should be discussed with patients to help them make informed decisions about reconstructive surgery.

Bridging the age gap in breast cancer: cluster randomized trial of two decision support interventions for older women with operable breast cancer on quality of life, survival, decision quality, and treatment choices

BACKGROUND

Rates of surgery and adjuvant therapy for breast cancer vary widely between breast units. This may contribute to differences in survival. This cluster RCT evaluated the impact of decision support interventions (DESIs) for older women with breast cancer, to ascertain whether DESIs influenced quality of life, survival, decision quality, and treatment choice.

METHODS

A multicentre cluster RCT compared the use of two DESIs against usual care in treatment decision-making in older women (aged at least ≥70 years) with breast cancer. Each DESI comprised an online algorithm, booklet, and brief decision aid to inform choices between surgery plus adjuvant endocrine therapy versus primary endocrine therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy. The primary outcome was quality of life. Secondary outcomes included decision quality measures, survival, and treatment choice.

RESULTS

A total of 46 breast units were randomized (21 intervention, 25 usual care), recruiting 1339 women (670 intervention, 669 usual care). There was no significant difference in global quality of life at 6 months after the baseline assessment on intention-to-treat analysis (difference -0.20, 95 per cent confidence interval (C.I.) -2.69 to 2.29; P = 0.900). In women offered a choice of primary endocrine therapy versus surgery plus endocrine therapy, knowledge about treatments was greater in the intervention arm (94 versus 74 per cent; P = 0.003). Treatment choice was altered, with a primary endocrine therapy rate among women with oestrogen receptor-positive disease of 21.0 per cent in the intervention versus 15.4 per cent in usual-care sites (difference 5.5 (95 per cent C.I. 1.1 to 10.0) per cent; P = 0.029). The chemotherapy rate was 10.3 per cent at intervention versus 14.8 per cent at usual-care sites (difference -4.5 (C.I. -8.0 to 0) per cent; P = 0.013). Survival was similar in both arms.

CONCLUSION

The use of DESIs in older women increases knowledge of breast cancer treatment options, facilitates shared decision-making, and alters treatment selection. Trial registration numbers: EudraCT 2015-004220-61 (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/), ISRCTN46099296 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh

BACKGROUND

Biological and synthetic meshes may improve the outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) by facilitating single-stage procedures and improving cosmesis. Supporting evidence is, however, limited. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of biological and synthetic mesh on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of IBBR 18 months after surgery.

METHODS

Consecutive women undergoing immediate IBBR between February 2014 and June 2016 were recruited to the study. Demographic, operative, oncological and 3-month complication data were collected, and patients received validated BREAST-Q questionnaires at 18 months. The impact of different IBBR techniques on PROs were explored using mixed-effects regression models adjusted for clinically relevant confounders, and including a random effect to account for clustering by centre.

RESULTS

A total of 1470 participants consented to receive the questionnaire and 891 completed it. Of these, 67 women underwent two-stage submuscular reconstructions. Some 764 patients had a submuscular reconstruction with biological mesh (495 women), synthetic mesh (95) or dermal sling (174). Fourteen patients had a prepectoral reconstruction. Compared with two-stage submuscular reconstructions, no significant differences in PROs were seen in biological or synthetic mesh-assisted or dermal sling procedures. However, patients undergoing prepectoral IBBR reported better satisfaction with breasts (adjusted mean difference +6.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.65 to11.61; P = 0.009). PROs were similar to those in the National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit 2008-2009 cohort, which included two-stage submuscular procedures only.

CONCLUSION

This study found no difference in PROs of subpectoral IBBR with or without biological or synthetic mesh, but provides early data to suggest improved satisfaction with breasts following prepectoral reconstruction. Robust evaluation is required before this approach can be adopted as standard practice.

The NeST (Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer) study: National Practice Questionnaire of United Kingdom multi-disciplinary decision making

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is increasingly used in the treatment of breast cancer, yet it is clear that there is significant geographical variation in its use in the UK. This study aimed to examine stated practice across UK breast units, in terms of indications for use, radiological monitoring, pathological reporting of treatment response, and post-treatment surgical management.

METHODS

Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) from all UK breast units were invited to participate in the NeST study. A detailed questionnaire assessing current stated practice was distributed to all participating units in December 2017 and data collated securely usingREDCap. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each questionnaire item.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine MDTs from a diverse range of hospitals responded. All MDTs routinely offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to a median of 10% (range 5-60%) of patients. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) was offered to a median of 4% (range 0-25%) of patients by 66% of MDTs. The principal indication given for use of neoadjuvant therapy was for surgical downstaging. There was no consensus on methods of radiological monitoring of response, and a wide variety of pathological reporting systems were used to assess tumour response. Twenty-five percent of centres reported resecting the original tumour footprint, irrespective of clinical/radiological response. Radiologically negative axillae at diagnosis routinely had post-NACT or post-NET sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in 73.0 and 84% of centres respectively, whereas 16% performed SLNB pre-NACT. Positive axillae at diagnosis would receive axillary node clearance at 60% of centres, regardless of response to NACT.

DISCUSSION

There is wide variation in the stated use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy across the UK, with general low usage of NET. Surgical downstaging remains the most common indication of the use of NAC, although not all centres leverage the benefits of NAC for de-escalating surgery to the breast and/or axilla. There is a need for agreed multidisciplinary guidance for optimising selection and management of patients for NST. These findings will be corroborated in phase II of the NeST study which is a national collaborative prospective audit of NST utilisation and clinical outcomes.

Experiences of implant loss after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most commonly performed reconstructive procedure in the UK, but almost one in ten women experience implant loss and reconstructive failure after this technique. Little is known about how implant loss impacts on patients' quality of life. The first phase of the Loss of implant Breast Reconstruction (LiBRA) study aimed to use qualitative methods to explore women's experiences of implant loss and develop recommendations to improve care.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who experienced implant loss after immediate IBBR, performed for malignancy or risk reduction across six centres. Interviews explored decision-making regarding IBBR, and experiences of implant loss and support received. Thematic analysis was used to explore the qualitative interview data. Sampling, data collection and analysis were undertaken concurrently and iteratively until data saturation was achieved.

RESULTS

Twenty-four women were interviewed; 19 had surgery for malignancy and five for risk reduction. The median time between implant loss and interview was 42 (range 22-74) months. Ten women had undergone secondary reconstruction, two were awaiting surgery, and 12 had declined further reconstruction. Three key themes were identified: the need for accurate information about the risks and benefits of IBBR; the need for more information about 'early-warning' signs of postoperative problems, to empower women to seek help; and better support following implant loss.

CONCLUSION

Implant loss is a devastating event for many women. Better preoperative information and support, along with holistic patient-centred care when complications occur, may significantly improve the experience and outcome of care.

Therapeutic mammaplasty is a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) may be an alternative to mastectomy, but few well designed studies have evaluated the success of this approach or compared the short-term outcomes of TM with mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Data from the national iBRA-2 and TeaM studies were combined to compare the safety and short-term outcomes of TM and mastectomy with or without IBR.

METHODS

The subgroup of patients in the TeaM study who underwent TM to avoid mastectomy were identified, and data on demographics, complications, oncology and adjuvant treatment were compared with those of patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBR in the iBRA-2 study. The primary outcome was the percentage of successful breast-conserving procedures in the TM group. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and time to adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 2916 patients (TM 376; mastectomy 1532; mastectomy and IBR 1008) were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing TM were more likely to be obese and to have undergone bilateral surgery than those having IBR. However, patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBR were more likely to experience complications than the TM group (TM: 79, 21·0 per cent; mastectomy: 570, 37·2 per cent; mastectomy and IBR: 359, 35·6 per cent; P < 0·001). Breast conservation was possible in 87·0 per cent of patients who had TM, and TM did not delay adjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSION

TM may allow high-risk patients who would not be candidates for IBR to avoid mastectomy safely. Further work is needed to explore the comparative patient-reported and cosmetic outcomes of the different approaches, and to establish long-term oncological safety.

The NeST (neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer) study - Protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to assess the current utilization and short-term outcomes of neoadjuvant systemic therapies in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has several potential advantages in the treatment of breast cancer. However, there is currently considerable variation in NST use across the UK. The NeST study is a national, prospective, multicentre cohort study that will investigate current patterns of care with respect to NST in the UK.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Phase 1 - a national practice questionnaire (NPQ) to survey current practice.Phase 2 - a multi-centre prospective cohort study of breast cancer patients, undergoing NST.Women undergoing NST as their MDT recommended primary breast cancer treatment between December 2017 and May 2018 will be included. The breast surgery and oncological professional associations and the trainee research collaborative networks will encourage participation by all breast cancer centres.Patient demographics, radiological, oncological, surgical and pathological data will be collected, including complications and the need for further intervention/treatment. Data will be collated to establish current practice in the UK, regarding NST usage and variability of access and provision of these therapies. Prospective data on 600 patients from ~50 centres are anticipated.Trial registration: ISRCTN11160072.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Research ethics approval is not required for this study, as per the online Health Research Authority decision tool. The information obtained will provide valuable insights to help patients make informed decisions about their treatment. These data should establish current practice in the UK concerning NST, inform future service delivery as well as identifying further research questions.This protocol will be disseminated through the Mammary Fold Academic Research Collaborative (MFAC), the Reconstructive Surgery Trials Network and the Association of Breast Surgery. Participating units will have access to their own data and collective results will be presented at relevant conferences and published in appropriate peer-reviewed journals, as well as being made accessible to relevant patient groups.

Abstract P2-12-01: Dose- and exposure-response relationship and biomarker correlation analysis in breast tumors from patients treated with capivasertib, an AKT inhibitor, in the STAKT randomized, placebo controlled pre-surgical study

Background: Capivasertib (AZD5363), an AKT1,2,3 inhibitor, significantly improved progression-free and overall survival when added to paclitaxel in triple negative breast cancer (BC) patients (Schmid et al. ASCO 2018). We have previously reported in STAKT, robust target inhibition at 480mg BD versus placebo, including significant decreases in the primary biomarkers (PBs) - Ki67, pPRAS40 & pGSK3β - in primary BCs (Robertson et al. SABCS 2017). We now report the dose- and exposure-response relationship of capivasertib and the correlation between primary and secondary (pAKT, pS6, nuclear FOXO3a) tumor biomarkers.

Design: STAKT was a two-stage, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled 'window-of-opportunity' trial in newly diagnosed ER+ BC patients. Stage 1 assessed capivasertib at a dose of 480mg BD p.o. versus placebo. Stage 2 assessed capivasertib at two lower doses 360mg and 240mg BD. Tumor biopsies were taken prior to 1st dose and after 4.5 days of dosing. Evaluable patients (who required pre-defined minimum baseline PD values for PBs) included placebo (n=11), capivasertib at 480mg (n=17), 360mg (n=5) and 240mg (n=6). Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were scheduled at pre-dose; 2, 4, optional 6 & 8 hrs post first dose on Day 1; ˜2-4 h post last dose on Day 5 (before biopsy). The % change from baseline for PBs were evaluated against the following exposure variables (placebo=0): i) Dose, ii) Observed Cmax Day 1 (˜2h post-dose), iii) Observed plasma concentration on Day 5, iv) Model-predicted plasma concentration Day 5 at time of biopsy, and v) Model-predicted AUC on Day 5. Spearman correlation coefficient measured the strength and direction of association between biomarkers.

Results:

· Significant mean reductions in % change from baseline were observed for the PBs pGSK3β (-39%; p&lt;0.006), pPRAS40 (-50%; p&lt;0.0001) and Ki67 (-23%; p=0.052) at 480mg versus placebo. At 360mg and 240mg, mean % changes from baseline in pGSK3β were -27% and -9%, respectively; in pPRAS40 -45% and -28%, respectively; and in Ki67 0% and +22%, respectively.

· Dose-response relationships for individual % change from baseline could be described by an Emax model for all PBs. Overall, the correlation to PK exposure (observed or predicted) was similar to the correlation to dose.

· Correlation coefficient analyses between biomarkers at capivasertib 480mg BD identified- i) Positive correlations for pGSK3β with Ki67 (ρ = 0.52, p-value &lt; 0.05) & with pS6 (ρ = 0.54, p-value&lt;0.05); ii) Negative correlations between FOXO3a and Ki67 (ρ = -0.75, p-value&lt;0.001) pGSK3β (ρ = -0.71, p-value&lt;0.001) & also pS6 (ρ = -0.61, p-value&lt;0.001).Correlation coefficients for lower doses are not robust due to small sample size in these groups.

Conclusions

· Capivasertib caused dose- and concentration- dependent effects on biomarkers after only 4.5 days.

· Significant changes in the PBs were demonstrated at 480 mg BD. Biomarker changes was observed at 360mg and 240mg BD, but statistical analysis was limited by the small sample size at lower doses.

· Correlation between a number of tumor biomarkers (relative changes) were identified for capivasertib 480mg BD.

Citation Format: Gee J, Coleman RE, Cheung KL, Evans A, Holcombe C, Skene A, Rea D, Ahmed S, Jahan A, Horgan K, Rauchhaus P, Littleford R, Finlay P, Cheung A, Cullberg M, de Bruin E, Foxley A, Koulai L, Pass M, Schiavon G, Rugman P, Deb R, Robertson JFR. Dose- and exposure-response relationship and biomarker correlation analysis in breast tumors from patients treated with capivasertib, an AKT inhibitor, in the STAKT randomized, placebo controlled pre-surgical study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-01.

Abstract GS3-02: PALLET: A neoadjuvant study to compare the clinical and antiproliferative effects of letrozole with and without palbociclib

Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors, such as palbociclib, are used to treat ER+ metastatic breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy with trials ongoing in patients with primary disease. No biomarkers exist to identify those who do/do not benefit from added CDK4/6 inhibition. PALLET is an investigator-initiated/led phase II randomized trial collaboration between UK and NSABP investigators evaluating the biological and clinical effects of palbociclib with letrozole combination as neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods: Postmenopausal women with ER+ primary breast cancer and tumors &gt;2.0cm (ultrasound) were randomized to one of 4 treatment groups (3:2:2:2 ratio): Group A: letrozole (2.5mg/d) for 14 weeks; Group B: letrozole for 2 weeks followed by letrozole + palbociclib to 14 weeks; Group C: palbociclib for 2 weeks followed by letrozole + palbociclib to 14 weeks; Group D: letrozole + palbociclib for 14 weeks. Palbociclib was given 125mg/d PO on a 21 days on, 7 days off schedule. Post-14 week treatment was at the discretion of the treating clinician including letrozole until surgery. Core-cut biopsies were taken at baseline, 2 weeks and 14 weeks. Co-primary endpoints for letrozole alone vs palbociclib groups (Group A vs Groups B+C+D) were: (i) change in Ki67 (IHC) between baseline and 14 weeks (log-fold change, Mann-Whitney test); (ii) clinical response (ultrasound) after 14 weeks (4 group, ordinal, Mann-Whitney test). Complete cell-cycle arrest (CCCA) (Ki67≤2.7%) was analyzed using a logistic regression model adjusting for recruitment region. Pre-specified exploratory biomarkers included c-PARP (apoptosis).

Results: 307 patients were recruited between 27 Feb 2015 and 08 Mar 2018; 103 were randomized to letrozole alone and 204 to letrozole + palbociclib. 279 (90.9%) patients were evaluable for 14 week clinical response. Clinical response was not significantly different between letrozole vs letrozole + palbociclib groups [(p=0.20; CR+PR 49.5% (46/93) vs 54.3% (101/186) and PD 5.4% (5/93) vs 3.2% (6/186)] nor was the small proportion of patients with pathological CR (1/87, 1.1% vs 6/180, 3.3%; p=0.43). 190 (61.9%) patients were evaluable for 14 week change in Ki67. The median log-fold change in Ki67 was greater with letrozole + palbociclib vs letrozole alone (-4.1 vs -2.2; p&lt;0.001) corresponding to a geometric mean change of -97.4% vs -88.5%. Similarly, a greater proportion of patients who received letrozole + palbociclib achieved CCCA (90% vs 59%, p&lt;0.001). 146 (47.6%) patients were evaluable for c-PARP and the log-fold change (suppression) was greater with letrozole + palbociclib vs letrozole alone (-0.80 vs -0.42; p=0.003) corresponding to a geometric mean change of -56.8% vs -31.4%. Other biomarkers of response / resistance are being evaluated. A higher proportion of patients had a grade ≥3 toxicity on letrozole + palbociclib than letrozole alone (49.8% vs 17.0%; p&lt;0.001) mainly due to asymptomatic neutropenia.

Conclusion: Adding palbociclib to letrozole markedly enhanced the suppression of malignant cell proliferation as assessed by Ki67 but did not substantially increase the clinical response of primary ER+ breast cancer over a 14-week period. Concurrent reductions in cell death may have reduced the speed of tumor shrinkage.

Citation Format: Dowsett M, Jacobs S, Johnston S, Bliss J, Wheatley D, Holcombe C, Stein R, McIntosh S, Barry P, Dolling D, Snowdon C, Perry S, Batten L, Dodson A, Martins V, Modi A, Cornman C, Puhalla S, Wolmark N, Julian T, Pogue-Geile K, Robidoux A, Provencher L, Boileau JF, Shalaby I, Thirlwell M, Fisher K, Huang Bartlett C, Koehler M, Osborne K, Rimawi M. PALLET: A neoadjuvant study to compare the clinical and antiproliferative effects of letrozole with and without palbociclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-02.

Abstract P4-04-06: AZD5363, an AKT inhibitor, significantly inhibits key biomarkers of the AKT pathway and Ki67, in a randomized, placebo, controlled study (STAKT) in human breast cancers

Background: AKT is an important intracellular control point through which Type 1 growth factors and IGFR signal. Mutations in PIK3CA, AKT and PTEN are prevalent in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) and have been implicated in resistance to endocrine therapies. AZD5363 is an inhibitor of AKT 1, 2 and 3 currently in Phase 2 trials for BC and other solid cancers.

Design: The study examined whether AZD5363 impacts on key biomarkers within the AKT pathway and their subsequent effects on Ki67, a marker of tumor proliferation. STAKT is a multi-center, two-stage, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, biomarker 'window-of-opportunity' trial in women with newly diagnosed, previously untreated ER+ BC who were deemed would require chemotherapy as part of their primary treatment regimen. Stage 1 assessed AZD5363 at a dose of 480mg bd p.o. versus matching placebo. Up to 30 patients per arm were permitted, to allow 12 subjects per arm with evaluable paired biopsies - obtained at baseline, and after 4.5 days of AZD5363 / placebo. Primary endpoint markers were pPRAS40, pGSK3β and Ki67 assessed by immunohistochemistry. pPRAS40 and pGSK3β were assessed by H-scores and measured separately for cytoplasmic (cyto), nuclear (nuc) and total (cyto+nuc) staining. Ki67 was assessed as % positive staining of 500 tumor nuclei. Laboratory staff were blinded to treatment arm and whether the biopsies were taken before or after AZD5363/placebo. Changes in marker expression (both absolute and %) between biopsies were calculated, and compared between the two groups. An ANOVA test was applied for normally distributed data and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney used if not normally distributed.

Results: 28/36 patients were evaluable with patient & tumor characteristics as follows: 17 received AZD5363 and 11 placebo; the median ages were 48 & 49 years respectively. 27 patients were Caucasian and 1 African-American. Tumors were all ER+. For HER2 status 8 were positive & 9 negative in the AZD5363 treated group compared to 2 & 9 respectively in the placebo group.

For pPRAS40 and pGSK3β cyto was the predominant staining while for Ki67 staining was nuclear. Changes in each marker with associated p-values are shown in the table.

MarkerType of change vs baselineDegree of change in AZD5363 arm (n=17)p-value versus placebo arm (n=11)pPRAS40 (H-score)TotalAbsolute-83.8&lt;0.0001Total%-50.2&lt;0.0001CytoAbsolute-90.0&lt;0.0001Cyto%-55.8&lt;0.0001NucAbsolute+6.90.42Nuc%+8.90.94pGSK3β (H-score)TotalAbsolute-55.30.006Total%-39.00.006CytoAbsolute-53.60.006Cyto%-39.20.006NucAbsolute-2.80.065Nuc%-36.50.058Ki67 (% cells+)Absolute-9.60.031%-29.40.052

Conclusions• AZD5363 for 4.5 days caused highly significant falls in pGSK3β and pPRAS40, key markers of AKT pathway activation

• AZD53643 also caused a significant decline in Ki67 even after only 4.5 days of drug. This is one of the shortest 'window'-studies to report such an early effect on proliferation.

• Placebo controlled 'window' studies of this short duration can provide important evidence of the therapeutic potential early in a drug's development.

Citation Format: Robertson JFR, Coleman RE, Cheung KL, Evans A, Holcombe C, Skene A, Rea D, Ahmed S, Jahan A, Kelly S, Horgan K, Rauchhaus P, Littleford R, Foxley A, Lindemann JPO, Pass M, Rugman P, Deb R, Finlay P, Gee JMW. AZD5363, an AKT inhibitor, significantly inhibits key biomarkers of the AKT pathway and Ki67, in a randomized, placebo, controlled study (STAKT) in human breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-06.

Abstract P3-06-03: The short term effects of an AKT inhibitor (AZD5363) on biomarkers of the AKT pathway and anti-tumour activity in a breast cancer paired biopsy study (STAKT trial)

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Abstract P2-09-02: True effect of aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment on global gene expression (expr) changes in postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer (BC) patients: A POETIC study (CRUK/07/015)

BACKGROUND Gene expression (expr) analyses are increasingly used for characterising the pharmacodynamic response of primary BC. This includes assessing ER+ BC's dependence on estrogen (E) by measuring gene expr changes after AI-treatment. However, differences in tissue sampling and other preanalytic procedures between samples taken at diagnosis (D) and surgery (S), may lead to systematic artifactual changes that are falsely ascribed to the intervention. To identify genes whose expr is truly affected by AI, we measured global gene expr changes from paired core-cut biopsies at D and S from patients in the POETIC presurgical window trial.

METHODS In POETIC, 4486 postmenopausal women with primary ER+ BC were randomised 2:1 to receive perioperative AI (2 weeks pre + 2 weeks post surgery, termed Tr) or no perioperative treatment (termed Con), allowing gene expr changes to be compared between Tr and Con. RNA was extracted from paired RNA-later stored core-cuts of 56 Con and 157 Tr patients and arrayed on Illumina whole genome expr BeadChips. Raw data was extracted, transformed, normalised and batch-corrected. Probes not detected (p&gt;0.01) in &gt;=25% of samples were discarded. Impact of AI on genes was evaluated based on difference of the expr mean changes (log2(S/D)) of the Tr and Con samples.

RESULTS In the Con group, expr of 73 genes significantly changed (FDR&lt;5%); 70 of these changed by a similar magnitude in the Tr group, indicating their change was independent of AI therapy but would have been artifactually discovered as changed by AI in the absence on Con. The 8 genes most up-regulated in Tr were all among the 20 genes most up-regulated in Con: many were early-response or stress-associated genes. Three of the 8 most down-regulated in AI were the most down-regulated in Con: all were haemoglobin-related. Expr of some genes was changed in Con (eg MYC increase) but was unaffected in Tr. Such artifactual gene changes in Con tumors conceal true AI-induced changes that would not be detected in the absence of comparison with Con.

615 genes were down-regulated and 472 up-regulated in Tr but not Con. The majority of down-regulated genes were cell cycle or proliferation-associated or E-regulated, including ESR1, PDZK1, GREB1, HSPB1. Functional mapping showed changes in the regulation of cyclins and cyclin dependent kinases impacting on G1/S and G2/M. Of note, up-regulated genes included CDK6 (target for CDK4/6 inhibitors) and CCND2, involved in G1/S checkpoint regulation; SNAI2, TGFB3, TGFBR2, associated with tumour invasion and metastasis; and other genes involved in aryl hydrocarbon receptor, Glioblastoma Multiforme, HIPPO and p53 signalling.

CONCLUSION Expr of certain genes is altered by processes involved in presurgical window studies. In the absence of a Con group, these may be wrongly ascribed to an experimental intervention or wrongly considered as unaffected by the intervention (eg MYC in this study).

Down-regulation of E-responsive and proliferation genes was an expected response to AI but increased expr of genes such as SNAI2, CCND2 and CDK6 indicates immediate tumour re-wiring and provides mechanistic support for benefit from combination therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor.

Citation Format: Gao Q, López-Knowles E, Cheang MCU, Morden J, Martin L-A, Sidhu K, Evans D, Martins V, Dodson A, Skene A, Holcombe C, Mallon E, Abigail E, Bliss J, Robertson J, Smith I, Dowsett M. True effect of aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment on global gene expression (expr) changes in postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer (BC) patients: A POETIC study (CRUK/07/015) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-02.

Abstract P2-03-04: Application of digital-PCR technology to determine c-MET copy number variation in paired primary breast cancer and brain metastases

INTRODUCTION:

c-MET amplification/overexpression has been associated with treatment failure and progression in many cancers, including breast cancer (BC). c-MET showed amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in 27% of trastuzumab-treated HER2-positive patients. These patients had a high trastuzumab failure rate and a shorter time to progression. Up to 50% of patients with metastatic HER2-positive disease will develop brain metastases (BM) during their disease course and in approximately one third, brain is the first site of progression. Amplification/copy number variations (CNVs) are mainly assessed by FISH whereas overexpression is assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We present a PCR-based assay (digital-PCR) able to determine CNV in c-MET and HER2 in a cohort of patients with metastatic BC to the brain and demonstrate the correlation of CNV to protein expression.

METHODS:

DNA was isolated from paraffin-embedded tissues of 23 paired primary BC-BM cases. CNV was analysed by the QuantStudioTM 3D-Digital-PCR (QS3D) and real-time qPCR (both from ThermoFisher Scientific). The breast MCF7, T47D, BT474, AU565, SKBR3 and the gastric MKN45 cell lines were used as controls for the HER2 and c-MET CNV assays. Copy number per diploid genome was calculated using the absolute quantification number of FAM-labelled target and VIC-labelled RNaseP reference multiplied by 2. Cases with ≤2 copies are classified as normal whereas cases with &gt;2 were classified as amplified. The HER2 positivity of the primary BC cases was routinely assessed by IHC. The c-MET protein expression was assessed by IHC using the c-MET(3D4) monoclonal antibody (ThermoFisher Scientific).

RESULTS:

CNV in c-MET by QS3D digital-PCR was detected in 69.6% of primary BC (ER-/HER2+:2, ER+/HER2+:5, ER+/HER2-:8, Triple-negatives:5, unknown:3) as well as 69.6% of BM, whereas HER2 CNV was observed in 39.1% primary BC and 52.2% BM. In the HER2-positive cases, the prevalence of HER2 CNV was 100% in both primary BC and BM. Within these cases, c-MET CNV was 85.7% in the primary BC and 71.43% in BM. CNVs in both genes were observed in 30.4 % of all primary and 39.1% of BM. The CNV data are presented in Table 1.

CNV data for c-MET and HER2 between primary breast cancer (BC) and corresponding brain metastatic (BM) casesc-MET CNVHER2 CNVBCBMBCBM&gt;2: 16&gt;2: 12≤2: 4&gt;2: 9&gt;2: 8≤2: 1≤2: 7&gt;2: 4≤2: 3≤2: 14&gt;2: 4≤2: 10

There was a high concordance between the QS3D and qPCR data with Pearson's R=0.74 (p&lt;0.00001).

A significant correlation between HER2 protein expression and CNV was observed (Fisher's exact test p=0.0005). Data will be presented on c-MET protein expression in the pair samples.

CONCLUSIONS:

The prevalence of CNV is much higher than that reported by immunohistochemistry and FISH in the literature to date, possibly due to the sensitivity of the digital-PCR technology. The high level of c-MET CNV in primary and metastatic BC, and the concurrent CNV in both genes warrants further investigation. It also highlights the potential to use c-MET directed therapy particularly in HER2+ BC and reinforces the potential importance of precise detection methods in both the primary and metastatic setting. Analysis of a larger series is currently on-going.

Citation Format: Giannoudis A, Zakaria R, Platt-Higgins A, Syed KAR, Ashton K, Dawson T, Rudland PS, Holcombe C, Jenkinson MD, Palmieri C. Application of digital-PCR technology to determine c-MET copy number variation in paired primary breast cancer and brain metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-04.

PO-36 - Thrombin Inhibition Preoperatively (TIP) in early breast cancer, the first clinical trial of NOACs as an anti-cancer agent: trial methodology

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is associated with a 3-4 fold increased risk of VTE. These patients have a 4-fold lower survival than those remaining free of VTE, implying VTE is a surrogate marker for aggressive cancer. Tumour expression of thrombin pathway markers are increased in the oestrogen receptor negative (ER-), high Ki67, more aggressive breast cancer subtypes. In in vitro and in vivo studies, the thrombin pathway promotes cancer growth and metastases, highlighting the potential role of the thrombin pathway as a therapeutic target in cancer.

AIM

To determine whether 14days of a preoperative oral Factor Xa inhibitor (Rivaroxaban) in oestrogen receptor negative early breast cancer patients results in inhibition of tumour proliferation as determined by a reduction in tumour Ki67 from baseline (pre-treatment) to 14days post treatment start (at time of surgical excision).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RATIONALE

The TF-VIIa-FXa complex activates Protease Activated Receptor (PAR)2 to induce angiogensis, growth factors and tumour cell migration. Thrombin, in part via PAR1, induces angiogenesis, tumour cell proliferation as well as in vivo metastasis. In early breast cancer, TF and PAR2 expression is increased in the stroma, particularly in the more aggressive ER-, high Ki67 (proliferation) cancers. Rivaroxaban is an orally active direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Through inhibition of the TF-FVIIa-FXa complex, it can downregulate TF-FVIIa-FXa activation of PAR2, and inhibit conversion of prothrombin to thrombin. We hypothesise that 14days of Rivaroxaban will reduce breast cancer proliferation, as a surrogate marker for anti-cancer efficacy, in early breast cancer patients awaiting resectional surgery.

RESULTS

Trial methodology: A multi-centre phase II preoperative 'Window-of Opportunity' randomised controlled trial of Rivaroxaban compared to no treatment in ER-, stage I-III early breast cancer patients. Patients will be randomised 1:1:1 (Rivaroxaban 20mg od: Rivaroxaban 10mg od: no treatment) and receive 14 (+/-3) days of treatment in the window between diagnosis and surgery. Randomisation will be blinded to pathologists, but not to patients or clinicians. Primary analysis will be based on the two Rivaroxaban arms being combined to form a Rivaroxaban: no treatment, 2:1 trial design, with change in Ki67 from baseline (pre) to post Rivaroxaban/no treatment (post) being the primary endpoint, and the no treatment arm acting as a reference group. Subgroup analysis of the Rivaroxaban arm (20mg od:10mg od) will allow assessment of dose-response.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Funder: National Institute for Health Research Eudract No: 2014-004909-33 REC Number: 15/NW/0406 UKCRN ID: 19731 Expected commencement: January 2016. For further information please contact Chief Investigator: cliona.kirwan@manchester.ac.uk.

Abstract S6-03: Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of loco-regional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in-situ (IBIS-II DCIS)

Background: Third generation aromatase inhibitors are a more effective treatment option than tamoxifen for hormone receptor positive invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. However, it is not known whether anastrozole is more effective than tamoxifen in preventing the recurrence of breast cancer in women with hormone receptor (HR) positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Here, we compare the efficacy of anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with HR positive DCIS.

Methods: A multi-centre randomised placebo-controlled trial of 1mg/day anastrozole (oral) vs. 20mg/day tamoxifen (oral) for five years was conducted in 2980 postmenopausal women with locally excised HR positive DCIS. The primary endpoint was to determine if anastrozole is at least as effective as tamoxifen in loco-regional control and prevention of contralateral disease. Secondary endpoints included breast cancer mortality, other cancers, cardiovascular disease, fractures, adverse events and non-breast cancer deaths. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis and Cox proportional hazard were used to compute hazard ratios and corresponding confidence intervals for recurrence.

Results: Between 2003 and 2012, a total of 2980 postmenopausal women were recruited into the IBIS-II DCIS trial. 1471 women were randomly assigned to receive anastrozole and 1509 women tamoxifen. Median follow-up for this first analysis is 6.8 years and 131 breast cancer recurrences have been recorded. Median age was 60.3 years (56.1-64.6), median BMI was 26.7 (23.6-30.7), and 45.6% of women had used hormone replacement therapy (HRT) before joining the trial. Of the 131 women with recurrent disease, 77 had a loco-regional recurrence and 51 reported contralateral disease. A total of 61 deaths were recorded. We will present a comprehensive analysis of the efficacy of anastrozole and tamoxifen for preventing loco-regional/contralateral breast cancer and major adverse events by intention to treat (ITT).

Conclusions: To follow.

Citation Format: Cuzick J, Forbes JF, Sestak I, Howell A, Bonanni B, Bundred N, Levy C, von Minckwitz G, Eiermann W, Neven P, Stierer M, Holcombe C, Coleman RE, Jones LJ, Ellis I. Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of loco-regional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in-situ (IBIS-II DCIS). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-03.

Abstract P5-15-07: Knowledge of oncotype Dx recurrence score increases confidence and concordance in adjuvant decisions of U.K. oncologists

Introduction

The addition of Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score (RS) to the assessment of patients with ER positive, HER2 negative, node negative breast cancer has led to a reduction in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, crude measurement of this reduction masks a more complex scenario. Prior to the introduction of routine Oncotype DX testing by NHS England, we wished to explore in more detail the potential impact of the knowledge of the RS on the therapeutic discussion. This study analyses the impact of RS on the adjuvant therapy recommendations within a UK Cancer Centre. In particular, it examines how the degree of certainty the oncologist has about the best option changes with knowledge of RS and how this influences concordance of decision making between oncologists.

Methods

A panel of five breast oncologists reviewed 50 consecutive cases, collected from November 2012 until November 2014, across two hospitals. Oncologists allocated each case to one of four treatment categories: chemotherapy recommended (CRec), chemotherapy discussed with a bias towards recommended (CDis), chemotherapy discussed with a bias toward endocrine therapy alone (EDis) or endocrine therapy only advised (ERec). The cases were analysed blindly and in random order without and with RS . The degree to which knowledge of RS altered treatment recommendation was analyzed. Other outcomes included the proportion of patients who were scored ERec compared with any other outcome, the trend towards definitive recommendations, the impact of RS on concordant decision making and the degree to which outcome was stratified by RS result. Chi squared and Spearman's coefficient statistical tests were used in analysis.

Results

Knowledge of the RS altered the recommended treatment category in 66.7% of cases (p&lt;0.001).

Alterations in treatment recommendations in response to Oncotype Recurrence Score in addition to pathological parameters CRec (n)CDis (n)EDis (n)ERec (n)Without RS2% (1)40% (20)52% (26)6% (3)With RS12% (6)16% (8)26% (13)46% (23)

Overall, RS correlated significantly with treatment recommendation. Oncologists were confident to recommend endocrine therapy alone in 46% of patients when RS was known compared with only 6% of patients without RS. Complete concordance between oncologists increased with the knowledge of RS from 14% to 64%.

Conclusion

Discussion of adjuvant chemotherapy with patients who have ER positive, HER2 negative, node negative breast cancer can be complex and, at times, confusing for the patient, leading to increased distress. This study shows that, in addition to the previously recognised reduction in overall use of chemotherapy, the knowledge of the RS increased the proportion of patients for whom the oncologist felt confident in making a firm treatment recommendation. An added benefit was to increase concordance between different oncologists compared to that achieved when relying on standard pathological features.

Citation Format: Kiernan T, Olsson-Brown AC, Innes H, Holcombe C, Thorp N, O'Hagan J, Wong H, Palmieri C, O'Reilly S. Knowledge of oncotype Dx recurrence score increases confidence and concordance in adjuvant decisions of U.K. oncologists. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-07.

The intensity of breast cancer patients' relationships with their surgeons after the first meeting: Evidence that relationships are not 'built' but arise from attachment processes

BACKGROUND

Cancer clinicians are exhorted to build clinical relationships with their patients over time using patient-centred communication skills. An alternative view is that patients' sense of relationship is a response to clinicians' expertise and authority and therefore is normally present from the start.

OBJECTIVE

We measured the intensity of breast cancer patients' sense of relationship with their surgeon after their first brief, diagnostically focused meeting in order to compare it with published reports from patients in other types and stages of clinical relationship.

PARTICIPANTS

Women (N = 133) over 18 years old and due to undergo surgery for primary breast cancer were recruited consecutively from pre-operative clinics.

DESIGN

Patients reported the intensity of their relationship with the surgeon on a standardised questionnaire (Working Alliance Inventory). We compared their ratings with published reports over the last 15 years, in which patients in other types of clinical relationship completed the same questionnaire.

RESULTS

Patients' alliance with their surgeons was very high (mean 6.13, 95% CI: 5.99, 6.27, on a 1-7 scale), and at 90(th) percentile when compared with scores from other settings, including those characterized by many hours of talk addressing patients' emotional needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with breast cancer feel an intense sense of relationship with the surgeon from the first meeting, consistent with the view that their sense of relationship arises primarily from their recognition of the surgeon's expertise and authority. The challenge for surgeons is therefore not usually to 'build a relationship' but to support the sense of relationship that patients have from the start.

Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery

BACKGROUND

Appropriate outcome selection is essential if research is to guide decision-making and inform policy. Systematic reviews of the clinical, cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes of reconstructive breast surgery, however, have demonstrated marked heterogeneity, and results from individual studies cannot be compared or combined. Use of a core outcome set may improve the situation. The BRAVO study developed a core outcome set for reconstructive breast surgery.

METHODS

A long list of outcomes identified from systematic reviews and stakeholder interviews was used to inform a questionnaire survey. Key stakeholders defined as individuals involved in decision-making for reconstructive breast surgery, including patients, breast and plastic surgeons, specialist nurses and psychologists, were sampled purposively and sent the questionnaire (round 1). This asked them to rate the importance of each outcome on a 9-point Likert scale from 1 (not important) to 9 (extremely important). The proportion of respondents rating each item as very important (score 7-9) was calculated. This was fed back to participants in a second questionnaire (round 2). Respondents were asked to reprioritize outcomes based on the feedback received. Items considered very important after round 2 were discussed at consensus meetings, where the core outcome set was agreed.

RESULTS

A total of 148 items were combined into 34 domains within six categories. Some 303 participants (51·4 per cent) (215 (49·5 per cent) of 434 patients; 88 (56·4 per cent) of 156 professionals) completed and returned the round 1 questionnaire, and 259 (85·5 per cent) reprioritized outcomes in round 2. Fifteen items were excluded based on questionnaire scores and 19 were carried forward to the consensus meetings, where a core outcome set containing 11 key outcomes was agreed.

CONCLUSION

The BRAVO study has used robust consensus methodology to develop a core outcome set for reconstructive breast surgery. Widespread adoption by the reconstructive community will improve the quality of outcome assessment in effectiveness studies. Future work will evaluate how these key outcomes should best be measured.

Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) may improve outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). The aim of this study was critically to appraise and evaluate the current evidence for ADM-assisted IBBR.

METHODS

Comprehensive electronic searches identified complete papers published in English between January 2000 and August 2013, reporting any outcome of ADM-assisted IBBR. All systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) with more than 20 ADM recipients were included. Studies were critically appraised using AMSTAR for systematic reviews, the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and its adaptation for NRSs. Characteristics and results of identified studies were summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 69 papers (8 systematic reviews, 1 RCT, 40 comparative studies and 20 case series) were identified, all of which were considered at high risk of bias, mostly due to patient selection and selective outcome reporting. The median ADM group sample size was 51.0 (i.q.r. 33.0-127.0). Most studies were single-centre (54), and they were often single-surgeon (16). ADM was most commonly used for immediate (40) two-stage IBBR (36) using human ADM (47), with few studies evaluating ADM-assisted single-stage procedures (10). All reported clinical outcomes (for example implant loss) and more than half of the papers (33) assessed process outcomes, but few evaluated cosmesis (16) or patient-reported outcomes (10). Heterogeneity between study design and, especially, outcome measurement precluded meaningful data synthesis.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence for the value of ADMs in IBBR is limited. Use in practice should therefore be considered experimental, and evaluation within registries or well designed and conducted studies, ideally RCTs, is recommended to prevent widespread adoption of a potentially inferior intervention.

Breast cancer survivors' perspectives on whether clinical staff should ask breast cancer patients about childhood abuse

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have shown that women who recall childhood abuse are at increased risk of emotional problems following a breast cancer diagnosis. How services should respond is unclear given the risk of compounding the emotional trauma of cancer with questioning about abuse. Our aim was to present the research findings to women with experience of breast cancer so as to obtain their perspective on how this evidence should influence clinical practice.

METHODS

Participants were women who had been treated for breast cancer at one of the study units and women with a history of breast cancer who were members of a local patient support group. Three focus groups were conducted (with six, five and three participants respectively). The interview transcripts were analysed qualitatively.

RESULTS

Participants emphasised the importance of the research findings for cancer care. The consensus was that abuse and its consequences for patients being treated for cancer should not be a 'taboo' area, and that patients should be given the opportunity and choice to disclose abuse as part of a holistic programme of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Services should examine how to include prompts about abuse as part of routine holistic assessment by clinical staff, who will need to be trained in eliciting and managing disclosures of abuse.

Abstract P4-17-03: Towards the standardisation of outcome reporting in reconstructive breast surgery: Initial results of the BRAVO (Breast Reconstruction and Valid Outcome) Study–A multicentre consensus process to develop a core outcome set for reconstructive breast surgery

Introduction: Appropriate outcome selection is essential if research is to guide decision-making for patients, professionals and policy makers. Systematic reviews evaluating the clinical, cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction, however, have demonstrated marked heterogeneity of outcome reporting such that results from individual studies cannot be compared or combined. Standardising end-points by developing and using core outcome sets - an agreed minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all research and audit studies – is one way by which outcome reporting may be improved. We therefore report the initial results of the BRAVO (Breast Reconstruction and Valid Outcomes) Study which aims to use a scientifically rigorous Delphi consensus process to develop a core outcome set for reconstructive breast surgery.

Methods: The Delphi process involves the sequential completion of questionnaires to allow stakeholder opinions to be synthesised using item responses to prioritise outcome domains.

The questionnaire was developed from a long list of 148 outcomes generated from literature reviews and qualitative work with stakeholders. The outcomes were categorised into 34 domains in six categories (short-term complications; late complications; symptoms; psychosocial issues; practical issues and cosmesis) and each domain operationalised.

Key stakeholders were identified as patients, surgeons, specialist nurses and psychologists and participants were sampled purposively to ensure a breadth of perspectives. Each participant was sent a questionnaire and asked to prioritise the outcomes on a nine-point likert scale from 1(not important) to 9(extremely important).

The number of respondents in each group rating each outcome as not important(scores 1–3); equivocal(scores 4–6) or very important(score 7–9) were calculated for each item and compared between groups. The proportions of respondents rating each item as very important(score 7–9) was used to rank the items.

Results: 213 of the 430 questionnaires were returned(126/274 patients and 87/156 professionals) giving a response rate of 49.5%.

Patient participants had a median age of 53.4 years(range 34–76) and had undergone a full range of reconstructive procedures. The professional group included 39 breast surgeons, 20 plastic surgeons and 18 clinical nurse specialists.

There was agreement between 7 of the 10 outcomes that each group rated most highly. Items with consensus included patient-reported cosmesis, cosmetic satisfaction and early complications. Patients, but not professionals, considered generic complications such as bleeding to be important while professionals valued psychosocial issues such as self-esteem more highly than patients.

Conclusions: Patients and professionals prioritise similar outcomes, but areas of discrepancy with regard to complications and psychosocial outcomes remain. A further Delphi round asking participants to re-prioritise outcomes and a consensus meeting to ratify the final decisions will be necessary to determine a final core outcome set for reconstructive breast surgery.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-17-03.

How patients evaluate breast reconstruction after mastectomy, and why their evaluation often differs from that of their clinicians

INTRODUCTION

The evaluation of breast reconstruction after treatment for cancer sometimes differs between the patient who receives it and the surgeon who performs it. Questionnaire studies shed little light on this. We therefore aimed to discover what factors influence how patients evaluate breast reconstruction and thereby to understand sources of disagreement between practitioners and patients in their evaluation.

METHODS

At the study centre, patients who undergo reconstruction following breast cancer rate their subjective evaluation of the procedure, and the surgeon and breast care nurse jointly rate their assessment of cosmesis. We interviewed in depth 27 patients with a range of scores on each rating to elicit the reasons for their evaluations. Interviews were analysed qualitatively with particular attention to patients whose evaluations diverged from those of practitioners.

RESULTS

Influences on patients' subjective evaluations included two aspects of cosmesis (how 'normal' they felt and how normal or attractive they thought they appeared to others), but also how much they trusted and respected their practitioners and felt cared for by them, whether reconstruction had helped to complete their 'cancer journey' and post-operative complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients' subjective evaluation of reconstruction after cancer treatment extends well beyond cosmesis, and experience of cancer influences what they consider important. Evaluations therefore often differ from those of practitioners. Surgeons and specialist nurses need to be aware of the factors that influence patients' evaluations in order to guide patients appropriately in decisions about surgery, and to evaluate outcomes across the domains that matter to patients.

P4-11-18: Mammographic Surveillance in Atypical Hyperplasia of the Breast and Subsequent Development of Cancer. A Need for Long Term Follow Up

Introduction Atypical hyperplasia of the breast is a known risk factor for breast cancer. Despite this risk there are no published guidelines on a recommended follow up regime for these patients.

Methods A retrospective study was carried out on 1920 core biopsy results within a major screening breast unit from 2001 to 2005. Patients who had a final diagnosis of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH), Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia (ALH) and Lobular Carcinoma in Situ (LCIS) were included.

Information was extracted from multidisciplinary team meeting records, departmental data bases, pathology and radiology reports. Details of follow up and subsequent cancer diagnosis were noted.

Results 83 patients were diagnosed with ALH, ADH or LCIS from a core biopsy. The mean age was 54 years (range 40–85 years). Seventy six (91.6%) of these patients went on to have an excision biopsy. Sixty four (77.1%) women have received long term mammographic follow up ranging from 5 to 9 years to date. Nineteen patients did not receive mammographic surveillance. Of this group 2 patients with LCIS had bilateral risk reducing mastectomies and 2 patients died shortly after diagnosis with no evidence of breast cancer. Eight patients developed breast cancer 3 to 8 years after their initial diagnosis. Of these, four patients developed cancer in the same breast that atypia had been diagnosed in previously, and four in the contra lateral breast.

Conclusion 12.5 % of patients in the follow up group developed breast cancer within 8 years of diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia. A review of the literature suggests that in view of the increased risk of subsequent breast cancer in this group of women long term follow up is required. On the basis of these findings we recommend that all patients diagnosed with ALH, ADH or LCIS should be entered into an 18 monthly mammogram surveillance programme for 15 years.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-18.

Predictors of onset of depression and anxiety in the year after diagnosis of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety are common after diagnosis of breast cancer. We examined to what extent these are recurrences of previous disorder and, controlling for this, whether shame, self-blame and low social support after diagnosis predicted onset of depression and anxiety subsequently.

METHOD

Women with primary breast cancer who had been treated surgically self-reported shame, self-blame, social support and emotional distress post-operatively. Psychiatric interview 12 months later identified those with adult lifetime episodes of major depression (MD) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) before diagnosis and onset over the subsequent year. Statistical analysis examined predictors of each disorder in that year.

RESULTS

Of the patients, two-thirds with episodes of MD and 40% with episodes of GAD during the year after diagnosis were experiencing recurrence of previous disorder. Although low social support, self-blame and shame were each associated with both MD and GAD after diagnosis, they did not mediate the relationship of disorder after diagnosis with previous disorder. Low social support, but not shame or self-blame, predicted recurrence after controlling for previous disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety and depression during the first year after diagnosis of breast cancer are often the recurrence of previous disorder. In predicting disorder following diagnosis, self-blame and shame are merely markers of previous disorder. Low social support is an independent predictor and therefore may have a causal role.

Correlation of mRNA for oestrogen receptor beta splice variants ERbeta1, ERbeta2/ERbetacx and ERbeta5 with outcome in endocrine-treated breast cancer

This study has been performed to test the hypothesis that different oestrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) splice variants may be important determinants of clinical parameters, including outcome, in post-menopausal women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine treatment but no chemotherapy. Splice variants ERbeta1, ERbeta2 and ERbeta5 have been analysed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR in a cohort of 105 patients with primary breast cancer. Clinical correlates included age, grade, size, nodal status, ERalpha, progesterone receptor, Ki67, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Seventy per cent of cases were ERbeta1 positive, 69% ERbeta2 positive and 70% ERbeta5 positive. Within the cohort, 47% were positive for all three variants while 10% were negative for all three. ERbeta1 exhibited no discernible relationship with disease outcome. ERbeta2 and ERbeta5 expression was significantly associated with better RFS (P<0.005), and ERbeta2 with better OS (P=0.0002). In multivariate analysis, ERbeta2 (P=0.006), nodal status and the level of Ki67 expression were independent predictors for RFS while ERbeta2 (P=0.0008) and Ki67 status were independent predictors for OS. In the ERalpha-positive cases, or in the subset of those receiving adjuvant tamoxifen, ERbeta2 was significantly associated with good RFS (P<0.0005) and was the only independent marker of OS. We conclude that precise identification of splice variants of ERbeta are more important assessors than is ERbeta1 alone of the biological status of individual breast cancers, and hence in predicting their response to endocrine therapy.

Current patterns of referral in breast disease

The aim was to audit symptomatic referrals to this breast unit in 1998, in order to ascertain the main diagnosis in relation to age, and thereby identify the percentage and age of patients who were reassured and discharged without investigation. 3199 general practitioner referrals were seen in 1998. Of these, 8.7% (n=274) were diagnosed as cancer and 91.3% (n=2925) were given a non-malignant diagnosis. In those under 40 years, only 18 patients of the 1231 seen were diagnosed with cancer, and only one of these was younger than 30 years (29 years). Twenty-seven per cent (n=333) of women under 40 were diagnosed as normal, and of these 14% (n=174) had no investigation. We confirm the recommendations of the guidelines issued by the Department of Health, that in younger women without discrete lumps or family history, clinical examination and reassurance is adequate. This audit should therefore empower general practitioners, to confidently reassure the younger patient, without a discrete lump.

Thymidine phosphorylase expression and stromal vascularity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

AIMS

Periductal angiogenesis in ductal carcinoma in situ is associated with an increased risk of subsequently developing a recurrence. This study aimed to (1) identify the relation between periductal and stromal vascularity and recurrence and (2) determine whether thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is associated with angiogenesis or recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

Twenty cases of DCIS that did not subsequently recur, 20 that developed a subsequent in situ recurrence, and 12 that developed a subsequent invasive recurrence were investigated. Periductal and stromal (hotspot) microvessel density were determined quantitatively using antibodies to CD34 and von Willebrandt factor (vWF). TP expression by DCIS was assessed semiquantitatively using the H score method.

RESULTS

Stromal and periductal microvessel density assessed by anti-vWF gave similar mean values, and showed a strong positive correlation. When angiogenesis was assessed with anti-CD34 this association was lost. Not only were the mean values for both types of microvessel density higher than those obtained with anti-vWF, but the periductal microvessel density was significantly greater than the stromal microvessel density. TP expression was associated with stromal microvessel density assessed with anti-vWF, but not with anti-CD34. TP expression was not related to recurrence. No significant difference was identified in TP expression or stromal vascularity in DCIS between cases that recurred as DCIS and those that recurred as invasive carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent in situ or invasive disease after excision of DCIS does not appear to be related to stromal microvessel density or to TP expression by DCIS cells.

Angiogenesis and invasive recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

The development of an invasive recurrence following treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) converts a non-fatal disease to one associated with mortality. To date, no pathological or molecular features have been found to predict for the type of recurrence. Previous studies have suggested that in DCIS angiogenesis may be an important factor in determining the transformation from in situ to invasive carcinoma. We looked at 355 cases of DCIS and found that 32 had subsequently developed recurrent disease. In these 32 cases and in matched controls, periductal vascular density was determined using morphometry and anti-endothelial antibodies, von Willebrand factor (vWF) and CD34. Vascular density was related to the risk of both invasive and in situ recurrence. Normal lobules at least 2 mm away were used as controls. Differences in the phenotype of individual blood vessels was detected by performing dual staining immunofluorescence on selected cases. The microvessel density (MVD), as detected with the CD34 antibody, was higher around foci of DCIS than around normal breast lobules (P=0.001). Furthermore, it was significantly higher in cases of DCIS that recurred (P<0.0001). The findings with the vWF antibody were less clear cut and suggested a trend in decreasing MVD with increasingly aggressive disease. Dual immunofluorescence staining shows that the increase in MVD seen around DCIS is due to an increase in CD34+/vWF-blood vessels. An increase in CD34+/vWF-of blood vessels may be able to predict cases of DCIS that are at a high risk of developing a recurrence.