Exploring homologous recombination deficiency thresholds for predicting response to platinum-based treatment in triple negative breast cancer

525

Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status can be used to identify patients who are eligible for treatment with DNA damaging agents. Using a 3-biomarker Genomic Instability Score (GIS) threshold of ≥42, studies have previously examined the association between HRD status and outcomes in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, evidence suggests that a GIS threshold of ≥33 may be more appropriate. Here, we conducted an exploratory analysis evaluating the ability of ≥33 and ≥42 GIS thresholds to predict response to platinum-based treatment in patients with TNBC. Methods: Patients across 5 cohorts (TBCRC0301, TBCRC0082, NCT013725793, PrECOG 01054, combined cisplatin cohort4) were included in this analysis if they had a primary TNBC diagnosis, received neoadjuvant platinum-based treatment, had a valid GIS, and had known pathologic complete response (pCR) status. GIS was determined by a combination of loss of heterozygosity, telomeric-allelic imbalance, and large-scale state transitions.4,5 BRCA mutation status was defined by loss of function resulting from a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were calculated by comparing binary threshold status and binary pCR status. Results: A total of 204 tumors (158 BRCAwt; 33 BRCAm; 13 unknown) were included; pCR to platinum-based treatment occurred in 55 cases (39 BRCAwt; 14 BRCAm; 2 unknown). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were comparable between the ≥33 and ≥42 GIS thresholds, with the ≥33 threshold producing higher sensitivity values. This was true when thresholds were applied to all samples and to BRCAwt samples only (Table). Among patients who achieved pCR in response to platinum-based treatment, 5.5% of patients in the full cohort and 7.7% of those in the BRCAwt cohort had a GIS between 33-41. Conclusions: To ensure that the majority of patients likely to benefit from treatment are identified, a GIS of ≥33 may be the most appropriate threshold to predict response to platinum-based treatment in patients with TNBC; however, a prospective trial will be needed to confirm these findings. Additional studies will be important to determine whether this threshold may be appropriate to determine eligibility for other DNA-damaging agents such as PARP inhibitors. 1. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(11):1518-25 2. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(1):31-7. 3. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(3):629-38. 4. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(15):3764-73. 5. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;16(6):1-9. [Table: see text]

Factors associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw in women with breast cancer receiving high-dose bisphosphonates to prevent breast cancer metastases as part of the SWOG 0307 trial

552

Background: Bisphosphonates reduce the risk of bone metastases in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer but carry the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). We used the data collected in the S0307 trial to describe factors associated with provoked and unprovoked ONJ. Methods: In S0307, 6097 patients with Stage I-III breast cancer who had surgery were randomized to receive zoledronic acid (ZA) 4mg IV monthly for 6 months, then every 3 months, clodronate (CL) 1600mg daily, or ibandronate (IB) 50mg daily for three years, with no difference in bone metastases or disease-free survival. Patients completed dental procedures prior to and had a dental exam at enrollment. Pearson’s Chi-squared and Student’s T-test were used to test differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively; logistic regression was used test independent association. Results: Of 5836 evaluable women, 48 developed ONJ, which was associated with bisphosphonate type (28/2124 (1.26%) for ZA, 8/2185 (0.36%) for CL and 12/1527 (0.77%) for IB (p = 0.002). Median time to onset of ONJ was 24.9 (1.4-66.6) for ZA, 41.2 months (range 33.8-67.4) for CL, 23.9 (2.1-75.3) for IB (p = 0.0447). Infection was present in 21 (43.8%) and absent in 20. ONJ was considered unprovoked in 20 (41.7%) and provoked by dental extraction in 20 (41.7%), periodontal disease in 14 (29.2%), denture trauma in 6 (12.5%), other dental surgery in 3 (6.3%). ONJ was associated with dental calculus (OR 2.03 (95% CI: 1.08-3.81), gingivitis (OR 2.11, 95% CI: 1.12-3.98), and periodontal disease (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.45-5.53) that were moderate/severe and > 4mm periodontitis (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.18-4.08). Patients with provoked and unprovoked ONJ had similar amounts of dental disease and lesion location. ONJ was not associated with dentures, plaque, chemotherapy, corticosteroids or renal adverse events. In multivariate analysis (limited by small sample), only bisphosphonate type was associated with ONJ. Conclusions: ONJ prevalence was low, likely due to patients completing dental procedures before enrollment. ZA carried a higher risk of ONJ (though current adjuvant dosing interval recommendations are less frequent), with time to onset similar to IB. Oral CL and IB (not currently available in the United States) are thus likely more appropriate for patients with poor dental health. Clinical trial information: NCT00127205.

TBCRC 030: A randomized phase II study of preoperative cisplatin versus paclitaxel in TNBC—Evaluating the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) biomarker

507

Background: Cisplatin (C) and paclitaxel (T) have activity in TNBC, however predictive biomarkers are lacking. The HRD assay detects impaired dsDNA break repair and may identify BRCA1/2-proficient tumors for treatment with DNA targeting therapies. TBCRC 030 was designed to determine the association between HRD and response to preoperative chemotherapy (CT) in TNBC. Methods: This phase II study randomized patients (pts) with BRCA1/2-proficient/unknown stage I-III TNBC to 12 weeks (wks) of preoperative C or T, followed by surgery. HRD was performed on baseline tissue, with positive scores > 33. Non-responders at 12 wks could crossover to alternative CT. The co-primary objectives were to detect a positive association of HRD with pathologic response (RCB 0-1) vs not (RCB 2-3) to C and a negative association to T. Target accrual of 160 pts was planned to yield 140 evaluable specimens for HRD, providing 90% power for the primary objectives. Analyses used logistic models and likelihood ratio tests with one-sided Type I errors of alpha = 0.05. Results: 140 pts initiated treatment, (72 Arm C, 68 Arm T; 81% T1-2, 62% node negative); 138 were evaluable for response at 12 wks. Post-enrollment testing showed 8 pts (5.8%) with germline DNA-repair pathway mutations. HRD results were available for 95 pts (68.8%, 23 inadequate tissue, 22 pending); 68 (71.6%) were HRD positive: 38 in Arm C, 30 in Arm T. In response-evaluable pts, 87 (63.0%) had surgery at 12 wks, and 51 (37.0%) crossed over. Response outcomes are shown in the Table. No association was seen between HRD score and RCB response to either neoadjuvant C (OR 2.78, [CI 0.61, 17.74]) or T (OR 0.98, CI [0.20, 5.06]). There was no evidence of an interaction between HRD and CT arms. Similarly, no association was observed between HRD score and pCR to either C (OR 1.47, CI [0.40, 5.59]) or T (OR 0.61, CI [0.14, 2.52]). There were no new safety signals. Conclusions: In this mostly BRCA1/2 proficient TNBC cohort, 12 wks of preoperative C or T led to a similar response rate of about 40%; baseline HRD was not predictive of response to preoperative CT, defined either by RCB 0-1 or pCR. Further data will be presented. Correlative analyses of research tissues for markers predictive of response to specific CT in TNBC is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01982448. [Table: see text]

Abstract P1-17-03: Statin use, site of recurrence, and survival among post-menopausal women taking bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (SWOG S0307)

Purpose: Statins may mediate suppression of molecular pathways conferring benefit in cancer. Statins have shown anti-tumor effects in preclinical studies and have been associated with decreased recurrence and improved disease-specific survival. While designed to target cholesterol biosynthesis, statins can also have liver, bone and brain effects. We collected data on statin use in the S0307 adjuvant bisphosphonate trial to test the hypothesis that statin use may decrease risk of recurrence to liver, bone and brain as well as second primary (contralateral) breast cancers, and may act synergistically with bisphosphonates to decrease the risk of recurrence to bone.

Patients and Methods: In S0307, 6097 patients diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer who had undergone surgery and were receiving adjuvant systemic therapy were randomized to receive zoledronic acid, clodronate, or ibandronate for 3 years. No significant difference was found in disease-free survival (DFS) among the 3 groups, including a sub-analysis of patients > age 55. Statin use was infrequent in younger women in S0307, consequently we analyzed statin use in those > age 55. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine which variables were independently associated with DFS and to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Among women aged ≥ 55 years, 684 (27%) reported taking a statin at baseline and 1,848 did not. Both groups were similar in terms of hormone receptor and HER2 status (p = 0.82). Median age in the statin group was 64.3 versus 61.0 years in the no statin group, mean BMI 31.2 v. 29.5, mean tumor size 2.1cm v. 2.3cm, negative lymph nodes 60% v. 54%, Stage I disease 47% v. 36%, and receipt of chemotherapy 62% v. 71% (all p < 0.01). In the statin group, 122 (17.8%) experienced a DFS event compared to 313 (16.9%) in the no statin group (HR 1.18, CI 0.95-1.46). No difference was observed by statin use in overall recurrence (p=0.28), distant recurrence (p=0.64), or recurrences to the bone (p=0.64), liver (p=0.38) or brain (p=0.65) at initial recurrence. There was no synergy between statin use and specific bisphosphonates.

Recurrence and statin useOutcomeGroup 1: On stan at baseline n=684Group 2: No statin at baseline n=1848DFS events122 (17.8%)313 (16.9%)Died without recurrence51 7.5%)97 (5.2%)Recurrence71 (10.4%)216 (11.7%)Contralateral breast cancer9 (1.3%)17 (0.9%)Distant recurrence48 (7%)157 (8.5%)Bone as 1st site of distant recurrence (% distant recurrence)31 (65%)76 (48%)Liver as 1st site of distant recurrence (% distant recurrence)6 (13%)24 (16%)Brain/CNS as 1st site of distant recurrence (% distant recurrence)5 (10%)17 (11%)

Conclusions: We found no evidence that statins reduce risk of second primary breast cancers or distant metastases among post-menopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Despite promising preclinical data, they did not appear to act in synergy with a specific bisphosphonate. Though women in the statin group had less advanced disease at study entry, statin use was not associated with improved DFS. Results are limited by lack of information about type of statin used, adherence, or initiation of statin in control group.

Citation Format: Kizub D, Miao J, Stopeck A, Thompson P, Paterson AH, Clemons M, Dees EC, Ingle JN, Falkson CI, Barlow W, Hortobagyi GN, Gralow JR. Statin use, site of recurrence, and survival among post-menopausal women taking bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (SWOG S0307) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-03.

Abstract OT3-06-06: A phase I/II study of preoperative letrozole, everolimus, and TRC105 in women with newly diagnosed local or locally advanced potentially resectable hormone-Receptor positive and Her2 negative breast cancer

Hypothesis: Pharmacologic inhibition of angiogenesis and mTOR pathway blockade will enhance the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting in women with hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative (HR+/Her2-) breast cancer.

Background: In non-metastatic HR+/Her2- breast cancer, downstaging to stage I or 0 in the neoadjuvant setting has been associated with favorable prognosis. With chemotherapy yielding similar benefits with endocrine therapy, aromatase inhibitors have become the agents of choice in postmenopausal women. The elucidation of pathways that are operational in luminal breast cancer and compromise the efficacy of hormonal therapy along with preclinical and clinical evidence of successful combinations of endocrine therapy with targeted agents set the stage for more rational, effective, and equally well tolerated regimens. Proangiogenic signaling has been strongly associated with accelerated hormone-independent growth and resistance to endocrine therapies. Breast cancer cells with upregulated PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are resistant to hormonal therapy and this resistance has been restored by everolimus. Inhibiting mTOR, a downstream signaling node where multiple pathways converge has the potential to abrogate primary and escape signaling cascades that mediate resistance to endocrine therapies.

Study Design:

Phase I dose escalation: follows a 3+3 design. During the phase I, the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) will be determined. Letrozole will be kept the same for all cohorts (2.5 mg PO qd). Everolimus will be escalated from 5 mg (cohort 1) to 10 mg PO qd (cohort 2). TRC105 will be 15 mg/kg q2 weeks (cohorts 1 and 2). Premenopausal women at the time of enrollment will receive goserelin 3.6 mg SC q4 weeks to achieve ovarian suppression. Duration of treatment is 24 weeks.

Phase II dose expansion: will be initiated once the MTD and RP2D have been determined. Phase II follows a Gehan's two-stage design: 10 patients will enroll first, and if no patient has achieved downstaging, the study will close since it is unlikely (p=0.1) that 0/10 responses would occur if true response rate were >20%. If at least one patient has downstaging, 10 additional patients will enroll (total, 20).

Primary Objectives

Phase I: Determine the tolerability and feasibility of letrozole, everolimus, and TRC105 in women with newly diagnosed stage 2 and 3 HR+/Her2- breast cancer.

Phase II: in the same patient population determine the efficacy, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic parameters of the combination.

Correlative Studies: Immunohistochemistry for pAKT and PTEN, CD105, CD31/CD34, NG2, MCAM/CD146 on diagnostic tissue, research biopsy, and final surgical specimen. Surgical specimens that meet criteria for next-generation sequencing will undergo ribosome profiling

Key Eligibility Criteria:

Recent diagnosis of HR+Her2- breast cancer

Stage 2 and 3 breast cancer

Any histological grade

No prior treatment specific for breast cancer

Pre- and perimenopausal women are eligible if ovarian suppression is achieved with goserelin.

Current Status: Cohort 1 of the Phase 1 complete. Cohort 2 of Phase 1 actively enrolling.

Citation Format: Vaklavas C, Lamaster KV, Stringer EM, Falkson CI, Li Y, Forero A. A phase I/II study of preoperative letrozole, everolimus, and TRC105 in women with newly diagnosed local or locally advanced potentially resectable hormone-Receptor positive and Her2 negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-06-06.

Everolimus (EVE) plus endocrine therapy in patients with estrogen receptor–positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (BC): First- and second-line data from the BOLERO-4 study

1010

Background: Initial first-line (1L) data from the phase 2 BOLERO-4 (NCT01698918) study of EVE + letrozole (LET) in postmenopausal patients (pts) with ER+, HER2− metastatic BC (MBC) or locally advanced BC (LABC) have been previously reported. Here, we present updated 1L progression-free survival (PFS) data, plus new data describing second-line (2L) EVE + exemestane (EXE) in pts with disease progression after EVE + LET. Methods: Postmenopausal pts with ER+, HER2− MBC or LABC with no prior therapy for advanced disease received EVE 10 mg/day + LET 2.5 mg/day. After disease progression, pts could receive EVE + EXE 25 mg/day until further disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Primary endpoint: 1L PFS. Secondary endpoints: overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), 2L PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety (1L and 2L). Results: Among 202 pts (median age, 64 years) with 1L MBC (96%) or LABC (4%), median PFS (95% CI) was 21.7 (18.1–23.9) months, ORR was 43.6%, and CBR was 74.3%. 42 pts (median age, 62 years) with MBC (88%) or LABC (12%) who progressed on 1L EVE + LET received optional 2L EVE + EXE. 2L median PFS (95% CI) was 3.7 (1.8–9.1) months, ORR was 4.8%, and CBR was 21.4%. Common 1L adverse events (all grades, regardless of drug relationship) were stomatitis (69%), weight loss (44%), diarrhea (40%), nausea (37%), and anemia (35%); 2L adverse events included stomatitis (19%) and weight loss (19%). Median duration of follow-up from start of 1L to the data cutoff for these new analyses (17 June 2016) was 23.5 months. OS will be analyzed at a later data cut. Conclusions: EVE + LET is an effective regimen in 1L ER+, HER2− advanced BC. Thesedata support previously reported BOLERO-2 data demonstrating a PFS improvement from addition of EVE to an aromatase inhibitor. 2L data, although limited by the small number of pts, show preliminary evidence of EVE activity when continued beyond disease progression. No new safety signals were seen. Lower rates of stomatitis in 2L were noted. Clinical trial information: NCT01698918.

Correlation of Breast Cancer Index (BCI) prognostic and predictive results to Ki67 and tumor grade in early stage HR+ breast cancer

e12075

Background: Markers of tumor proliferative status, e.g., Ki67 and grade (G), are prognostic for early distant recurrence (DR) in HR+ breast cancer and integrated in adjuvant chemotherapy decisions; however, their impact on late DR and extended endocrine therapy (EET) decisions is less clear. BCI is a genomic assay that provides 2 results: BCI Predictive, based on HoxB13/IL17BR (H/I ratio), reports a prediction of likelihood of benefit from EET; BCI Prognostic, based on the algorithmic combination of H/I and proliferation genes, reports risk of late DR. In this study, BCI results were examined within clinicopathologic risk categories based on Ki67 and G. Methods: The BCI Clinical Database for Correlative Studies is an IRB-approved de-identified database that contains > 50 clinicopathologic and molecular variables from cases submitted for BCI testing in clinical practice (N = 14,463). Clinicopathologic variables were abstracted from pathology reports, and were available for a subset of cases. High Ki67 was defined as ≥14%. Chi-squared tests were used to compare BCI results between Ki67 and G subgroups. Results: Analyses included 3395 LN- pts (median age 59.1y; 73% ≥ 50y). BCI Prognostic showed a wide distribution of individual risk assessments in pts with high or low Ki67. A greater proportion of pts with high Ki67 was classified by BCI as high risk of late DR compared to low Ki67 (68.2% vs 26.5%; P < 0.0001); however, substantial proportions of high Ki67 pts were classified as BCI low risk (31.8%) and pts with low Ki67 classified as BCI high risk (26.5%). Overall, there was a moderate correlation between individual BCI Scores and individual Ki67 scores (Correlation = 0.519). 45.5% of pts with high Ki67 were classified as High BCI Predictive (H/I) compared to 35.5% of pts with low Ki67 (p < 0.001). Both BCI Prognostic and BCI Predictive (H/I) classified increasing proportions of pts as high risk or high benefit with increasing G (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: These findings help characterize differential stratification based on tumor biology vs Ki67/G for pts considering EET. While moderately correlated, both BCI Prognostic and BCI Predictive (H/I) identified distinct populations compared to Ki67 and G.

Abstract P1-15-02: Long term follow-up of the neo-adjuvant pilot trial evaluating activity of letrozole in combination with bevacizumab in post-menopausal women with newly diagnosed estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive primary breast cancer

Introduction: Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression has been associated with resistance to anti-estrogen therapy (Cancer Res 2008; 68: 6232); our preclinical data showed that anti-VEGF therapy reverse resistance to estrogen therapy. We postulated that anti-VEGF therapy would enhance anti-estrogen therapy and thus designed a pilot study to assess the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant letrozole and bevacizumab in post-menopausal women with stage II/III, ER/PR positive breast cancer.

Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were treated with a neo-adjuvant regimen of letrozole, 2.5 mg/day (PO) and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks (IV) for a total of 24 weeks prior to surgical treatment of their breast cancer. Patients were followed for toxicity at three week intervals and for tumor assessment at 6 week intervals. Research tumor biopsies were taken before and 6 weeks after initiation of therapy. The primary endpoint was pathological complete remission (pCR). Patients with inflammatory breast cancer were excluded.

Results: Twenty six patients were enrolled and 25 were treated (one patient had a TIA the day before initiation of therapy). The regimen was well tolerated with 2 patients taken off-study due to uncontrolled hypertension. Objective clinical response occurred in 68% of the patients (17/25), 16% with CR and 52% with partial response (PR). Sixteen percent of the patients (4/25) had clinical stable disease (SD) and 2 patients progressed (PD) while on therapy. Three patients had pCR and 1 patient had microscopic residual tumor cells in the LNs but not in the breast (pCR 16%). Thirty two percent of the patients attained stage 0 or 1 status. None of the pCR patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and none have relapsed after a median follow-up of 6.1 years (range, 5.8+ to 7.5+). Eight of the 13 patients with PR did not receive chemotherapy and only one relapsed with a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range, 3.7 to 7.7+). At a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 88% of the patients have not relapsed and 12% relapsed (1 PD [basal-like], 1 PR [Luminal B], 1 SD [HER2] relapsed at 1.7, 4, and 6.8 years respectively). Of the 17 patients with CR and PR, only 1 has relapsed (6%). Next Generation Sequencing Analysis and evaluation of markers of proliferation/apoptosis are underway.

Conclusion: Combination neoadjuvant therapy with letrozole and bevacizumab was well tolerated and resulted in an impressive pCR of 16%. At a median of 6.4 years, the relapse free survival is 88% for all comers and 94% for responding patients (Luminal A and B). Full correlation of clinical and genomic/biomarker analysis will be presented at the time of the meeting. This encouraging data has led The Breast Cancer Translational Research Consortium to complete a randomized phase II trial (TBCRC002) of letrozole ± bevacizumab in this patient population.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-15-02.

Abstract P5-17-07: Influence of bevacizumab on local-regional recurrence in triple negative breast cancer

Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises 15–20% of newly diagnosed invasive breast cancers and has been associated with an elevated risk of both local-regional recurrence (LRR) as well as distant failure. Bevacizumab (BEV) has been shown to improve pathologic complete response rates in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), but its effect on LRR remains undefined. This study reports the impact of adding BEV to standard breast cancer therapy in TNBC patients treated at a single institution.

Methods: One hundred and eighty-five consecutive TNBC patients treated at the University of Alabama Birmingham from May 2005 to August 2010 were reviewed. Thirty-one TNBC patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) and BEV on prospective studies were matched (1:2) with 62 TNBC patients treated with CT alone, controlling for age, stage, and use of radiation (RT). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate LRR, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), and cohorts were compared using Cox proportional hazards models and the 2-sided log-rank test.

Results: Mean age was 47 and 46 years in the cohorts with and without BEV, respectively. Stage in each cohort was as follows: 32% stage I, 61% stage II, and 7% stage III. Use of adjuvant RT was 81% in each cohort (25/31 BEV, 50/62 no BEV). BEV was delivered with NCT in 17 patients (55%) and with adjuvant CT in the remaining 14 patients (45%). Eleven patients (35%) completed an additional 1 year of maintenance therapy with BEV. LRR occurred in 2 (6%) patients treated with BEV vs. 16 (26%) treated with CT alone (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.06–1.07, p = 0.04). Distant recurrence occurred in 3 (10%) patients treated with BEV vs. 11 (18%) patients in the CT group HR=0.6, 95% CI 0.2–1.8, p = 0.48). There were 2 (6%) deaths in the BEV group vs. 12 (19%) in the CT alone group (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.13–2.3, p = 0.19).

Conclusions: In a matched-pair analysis of TNBC patients, the addition of BEV to conventional breast cancer management was associated with a reduction in LRR. Further prospective study is necessary to examine the impact of BEV on local-regional control in TNBC.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-17-07.

P2-09-07: Metabolic Response by FDG-PET in Patients (pts) Receiving Trastuzumab (T) and Lapatinib (L) for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Correlative Analysis of TBCRC 003

Background

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of L+T in pts with 0–2 prior lines of chemotherapy (CT) for HER2+ MBC. In the context of this phase II trial, we evaluated metabolic response by FDG-PET and explored the relationship between metabolic response and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Pts with measurable, HER2+ MBC were eligible. Cohort 1: No prior T, L, or CT +T for MBC, and &gt;1 yr from adjuvant T, if received. Cohort 2: 1–2 prior lines of CT for MBC, including T, or relapse within 1 yr of adjuvant T. Pts received L 1,000 mg QD + T (2 mg/kg weekly or 6 mg/kg Q3W). Staging studies were done with CT or MRI at baseline (BL) and every 2 cycles (1 cycle=4 weeks [wks]). Objective response was assessed by local investigator according to RECIST 1.0. FDG-PET/CT was performed at BL, Wk 1, and Wk 8 per NCI guidelines. Central quality assurance, review, and analysis were performed on FDG-PET studies. Up to 5 target lesions were identified on BL FDG-PET images based on hypermetabolic uptake. Percent change in the summed maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of target lesions was calculated at Wk 1 or Wk 8, compared to BL. Metabolic response was assessed according to EORTC criteria for % change in SUVmax (progressive disease [PD]: ≥25% increase; partial response [PR]: ≥25% decrease; stable disease [SD]: &lt;25% change). Metabolic response at Wk 1 was compared to Wk 8 as well as to clinical outcome, including objective response, clinical benefit, and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: 87 pts were registered to the study. Of these, one pt did not begin protocol therapy and one pt did not have MBC on further testing, and are not included. 81/85 pts had FDG-PET data at Wk 1; 75/85 had data at Wk 8. Metabolic PR at Wk 1 was observed in 28/39 (72%) pts in Cohort 1 and 20/42 (48%) pts in Cohort 2. Metabolic PR at Wk 8 was observed in 27/34 (79%) pts in Cohort 1 and 18/41 (44%) pts in Cohort 2. Wk 1 and Wk 8 metabolic responses were similar. In cohort 1, 18/28 (64%) pts who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR had clinical benefit by RECIST. Of pts with Wk 1 metabolic SD, 2/9 (22%) had clinical benefit. In cohort 2, 9/20 (45%) pts who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR had clinical benefit; 5/22 (23%) who achieved Week 1 metabolic SD had clinical benefit. Exploratory analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) showed that pts in Cohort 1 who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR experienced a median PFS of 9.3 months ([mos]; 95% CI 5.6−22.3); for pts with metabolic SD, median PFS was 1.9 mos (95% CI 0.8−5.5). For pts in Cohort 2, Wk 1 metabolic PR was associated with median PFS of 5.6 mos (95% CI 3.7−7.8), whereas for pts with metabolic SD, median PFS was 3.7 mos (95% CI 1.8−5.5).

Conclusions: L+T is associated with a high rate of early and sustained metabolic response by FDG-PET. Exploratory analyses suggest that metabolic PR may be associated with clinical benefit and longer PFS.

Vinorelbine and cisplatin in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: the South African experience

BACKGROUND

This phase II trial was performed to assess the activity and safety of the cisplatin and vinorelbine combination in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients with advanced cervical cancer were included in the study to receive vinorelbine at 30 mg/m2 on d 1 and d 8 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for response and 40 patients for tolerance. Twenty-four patients (64.8%) achieved objective responses. The median duration of response was 17.5 months (range 2.5-57 months), median time to progression was 13.2 months (range 0.4-57 months) and median survival was 20.6 months (range 0.4-55 months). This regimen was well-tolerated; no WHO grade 4 neutropenia was observed, grade 3 nausea and vomiting occured in 50% of patients and grade 2 peripheral neuropathy in 5% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Vinorelbine-cisplatin is an active and well-tolerated regimen in advanced cervical carcinoma.

21-day oral etoposide for metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study and review of the literature

Previous studies of etoposide for metastatic breast cancer commonly used bolus regimens given over a short period of time and included heavily pretreated patients. Results were poor. Chronic oral regimens would be expected to be superior to bolus doses based on pharmacologic studies and patients with less previous chemotherapy would be expected to have higher response rates. We studied the efficacy of oral etoposide at a dose of 50 mg/m2/day for 21 days of a 28-day cycle in good-risk patients with metastatic breast cancer. Healthy patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, or 2) who had not received chemotherapy for at least 1 year before study entry were selected for therapy. Thirty-four patients were entered; three patients were ineligible and one was cancelled. Thirty patients were available for analysis of response. One complete response and eight partial responses were documented (response rate, 30%; 95% confidence interval, 15-49%). A higher response rate was observed in those patients who never received chemotherapy compared with those who had received prior chemotherapy (57 vs. 6%, p = 0.004). There were two treatment-related deaths, both owing to myelosuppression and infection. We found long-term administration of oral etoposide to have a reasonable response rate for metastatic breast cancer (30%). Our response rate was comparable to those of other published studies of long-term oral etoposide regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Response rates in single-arm studies have generally been higher for long-term oral regimens than those for bolus regimens. We also found the regimen to be significantly toxic, an observation that may be underemphasized in the earlier literature.

Phase II trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in metastatic breast cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1196

PURPOSE

The purpose of this multi-institutional phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin and docetaxel plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The primary objective was to determine whether the combination produced a response rate of at least 50%.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with metastatic breast cancer received doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2) by intravenous [IV] injection) followed 1 hour later by docetaxel (60 mg/m(2) by IV infusion over 1 hour) every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. All patients also received G-CSF.

RESULTS

Objective response occurred in 29 (57%) of 51 eligible patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 42% to 70%), including three patients who had a complete response (6%; 95% CI, 1% to 16%). The median response duration was 7 months (95% CI, 6.0 to 15.0 months), median time to treatment failure was 7. 6 months (95% CI, 6.2 to 9.9 months), and the median survival was 27. 5 months (95% CI, 21.5 months to upper limit not reached). The median cumulative doxorubicin dose was 395 mg/m(2) (range, 60 to 480 mg/m(2)). Fifteen patients (28%) were documented to have a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction below normal, and three patients (6%; 95% CI, 1% to 15%) developed congestive heart failure.

CONCLUSION

Using criteria that we had defined a priori, the doxorubicin-docetaxel regimen as used in this study was sufficiently active and tolerable to justify a phase III comparison with doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early-stage breast cancer.

Prognostic value of histologic grade and proliferative activity in axillary node-positive breast cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Companion Study, EST 4189

PURPOSE

The identification of a subset of patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer with an improved prognosis would be clinically useful. We report the prognostic importance of histologic grading and proliferative activity in a cohort of patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer and compare these parameters with other established prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group laboratory companion study (E4189) centered on 560 axillary lymph node-positive patients registered onto one of six eligible clinical protocols. Flow cytometric (ploidy and S-phase fraction [SPF]) and histopathologic analyses (Nottingham Combined Histologic Grade and mitotic index) were performed on paraffin-embedded tissue from 368 patients.

RESULTS

Disease recurred in 208 patients; in 161 (77%), within the first 5 years. Mitotic index and grade were associated with both ploidy and SPF (P </=.01). Within the first 5 years of follow-up, mitotic index (P =.004), grade (P =.004), ploidy (P =. 006), and SPF (P =.05) were associated with time to recurrence; there was also a significant association with survival. The effect of mitotic index was largely a result of the difference between 0 to 2 mitoses/10 high-power fields (HPF; 5-year recurrence of 31%) and more than 2 mitoses/10 HPF (5-year recurrence of 52%). The 0 to 2 mitoses/10 HPF group was independently associated with improved prognosis at 5 years (P =.002) in regression models that included other standard prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

A subset of axillary lymph node-positive patients with improved prognosis may be identified using a lower (< 3 mitoses/10 HPF) mitotic count than is usually performed.

Treatment of squamous cell esophageal cancer with topotecan: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E2293)

Seventeen patients with enhanced measurable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were treated with topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 daily for 5 days repeated every 21 days. Toxicity was severe, with 1 death from myelotoxicity and 10 patients with life-threatening myelotoxicity. Severe gastrointestinal toxicity consisting of vomiting was also seen in three patients. No response was seen in any of the patients in the study. Topotecan given in this manner has no activity in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Phase II trial of doxorubicin and paclitaxel plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE

Several groups have reported that the combination of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel given as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion for up to eight cycles produces a high response rate (> 80%) and complete response rate (> 20%) in metastatic breast cancer, but is also complicated by a 20% incidence of congestive heart failure (CHF). The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the antineoplastic activity of the regimen in a multi-institutional setting and to reduce the incidence of cardiotoxicity by limiting treatment to a maximum of six cycles.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients with advanced breast cancer received doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2) by IV injection) followed 15 minutes later by paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2) by IV infusion over 3 hours) every 3 weeks for four to six cycles.

RESULTS

Objective responses occurred in 25 of 48 assessable patients (52%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38% to 66%), including four complete responses (8%; 95% CI, 0% to 16%). The median cumulative doxorubicin dose given was 240 mg/m(2) (range, 132 to 360 mg/m(2)). Eleven patients (21%) were documented as having a decrease in the LVEF below normal, including three patients (6%; 95% CI, 0% to 12%) who developed CHF.

CONCLUSION

The doxorubicin/paclitaxel regimen that we used is unlikely to produce an objective response rate of more than 70% and a complete response rate of more than 20% in patients with metastatic breast cancer, and proved to be excessively cardiotoxic for use in the adjuvant setting.

A phase II evaluation of clofazimine plus doxorubicin in advanced, unresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma

The riminophenazine compound clofazimine has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in vitro. Therapeutic benefit was claimed for patients with HCC treated with clofazimine in a recent clinical trial. The current trial was initiated to evaluate response and survival of patients with HCC receiving clofazimine plus doxorubicin. Twenty-eight patients were entered into the study, of whom 27 were evaluable for response and survival. No patients had a complete or partial response, and 9 had stable disease. The median survival time was 7 weeks. Toxicity was mild with yellow pigmentation of the skin resulting from the clofazimine, and leukopenia, nausea, vomiting and mucositis as expected from doxorubicin. Further studies using other riminophenazine compounds are warranted.

Extended survival in 80 patients with operable, locoregionally recurrent breast cancer treated with chemotherapy

Locoregional recurrence is a harbinger of disseminated disease, and historically the estimated 5-year survival when treated with local therapy only varies between 21% and 37%. The role of systemic treatment after local treatment is unclear at present. The authors investigated the results of systemic chemotherapy for these patients after complete local surgical resection. Data on 80 patients were evaluable for toxicity, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival. Sixty-four patients received doxorubicin-based treatments, four received methotrexate-based combinations, and 12 received tamoxifen only. Among the 68 patients treated with cytostatics, there were two possible treatment-related deaths. Two patients developed grade 3 neutropenia, four developed grade 3 vomiting, and 42 had grade 2 toxicity. The 2- and 5-year disease free survival at a mean follow-up period of 5.5 years were 56% and 38%, respectively. The projected median TTF was 32 months (95% confidence interval, 23-82). Two- and 5-year overall survival were 86% and 62%, respectively, with a projected median survival of 93 months (7.75 years; 95% confidence interval, 64-177). These results show systemic therapy improved TTF and survival for patients with stage IV, no-evidence-of-disease breast cancer. Randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and define optimal therapy.

A randomized study of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy plus 5-fluorouracil and platinum in patients with inoperable, locally advanced squamous cancer of the esophagus

Squamous cell cancer of the esophagus is the most common cancer among black South African males, and 60% of patients present with localized inoperable disease. Combined chemoradiotherapy has been reported to be superior to radiotherapy alone for localized inoperable esophageal cancer in North American patients. A study was carried out to determine if this was also applicable to South African patients, who present with more advanced disease. From September 1991 through June 1995, 70 patients with locally advanced (T3N0-1M0) squamous cancer of the esophagus were prospectively randomized to receive radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. There was no statistically significant survival difference between the two groups. The median survival was 144 days in the group receiving radiotherapy alone, and 170 days in the group receiving radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy (p = 0.42). The degree of weight loss before initiation of therapy had a significant effect on survival regardless of the treatment arm. Radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, as administered in this study for South African patients with locally advanced, inoperable squamous cancer of the esophagus, is no better than radiotherapy alone.

Current treatment options for malignant melanoma

The incidence of malignant melanoma has increased at an alarming rate over the past few decades. Indications are that it will continue to rise in the foreseeable future. Primary prevention of malignant melanoma through education of the general public regarding the hazards of sun exposure is important in an attempt to reduce the incidence of the disease in the future. It can, however, be expected to take many years before a decrease in the number of cases of this disease is seen. Until such time, the medical oncologist will be faced with an increasing number of referrals for both adjuvant therapy and treatment of metastatic disease. Many agents have been investigated as possible postsurgical adjuvant therapies in patients with malignant melanoma. To date, inteferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) given initially intravenously in high doses followed by subcutaneous therapy for 1 year, is the only treatment that has been shown to increase disease-free and overall survival in patients with high-risk melanomas. Patients falling into this group should still, wherever possible, be enrolled in prospectively randomised clinical trials. Although the prognosis for patients with metastatic melanoma remains poor, some progress in the management of this disease has been made. It has not yet been conclusively proven that combination chemotherapy yields superior results to single agent dacarbazine (DTIC) [which has for many years formed the cornerstone of therapy]. Immunotherapy involving IFNs and interleukin-2 (IL-2) alone or in combination has yielded similar results to those achieved with chemotherapy alone. The combination of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy appears to hold promise, with high response rates and often durable remissions reported, albeit at the expense of considerable treatment-related toxicity. Novel therapies including tumour vaccines and gene therapy also hold promise for the future management of this disease.

Phase III trial of dacarbazine versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b versus dacarbazine with tamoxifen versus dacarbazine with interferon alpha-2b and tamoxifen in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

To investigate the response rate, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and toxicity in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with dacarbazine alone, dacarbazine plus interferon (IFN), dacarbazine plus tamoxifen (TMX), or dacarbazine plus IFN plus TMX.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred seventy-one patients (258 were eligible) were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive one of the above treatments. The trial was designed to detect a 50% improvement in survival with 83% power.

RESULTS

Nine complete (CRs) and 18 partial responses (PRs) were observed in the patients who received treatments that contained IFN compared with four CRs and 18 PRs in the patients who received treatments that did not contain IFN. Five CRs and 20 PRs occurred in patients treated with TMX compared with eight CRs and 16 PRs in those treated without TMX. Response differences were nonsignificant. The overall median TTF was 2.6 months, and the overall median survival was 8.9 months. There was no significant difference in TTF or survival among any of the different treatments. Poor performance status (PS), hepatic metastases, and weight loss were significant adverse prognostic factors. Twenty-three patients had a TTF greater than 20 months, and these durable responses were evenly distributed among the treatment arms. Significantly more severe and life-threatening toxic events occurred with treatments that contained IFN.

CONCLUSION

Neither IFN, TMX, nor the combination significantly improved the response rate, TTF, or survival when added to dacarbazine, but IFN significantly increased toxicity.

Mitomycin C, epirubicin and cisplatin versus mitomycin C alone as therapy for carcinoma of unknown primary origin

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) site accounts for approximately 6.5% of all cancers. Optimal therapy for patients with CUP has not yet been delineated. The current study was undertaken to evaluate response, time to treatment failure and survival in patients with CUP treated with a combination regimen comprising mitomycin C, epirubicin and cisplatin (MEP) versus mitomycin C alone (MITOC). Eighty-four patients with CUP were randomised to receive either the combination (MEP) or MITOC. Both treatment arms were well matched for age, gender, performance status, dominant site and number of disease sites. Eighty of the above patients were evaluable. Twenty patients (50%) treated with MEP responded to treatment compared with 7 (17%) who received MITOC. Grade III-IV hemopoietic toxicity was documented in 2 patients treated with MEP and no patients treated with MITOC. A single patient treated with MEP developed grade I peripheral neuropathy. Median time to treatment failure was 4.5 months for patients receiving MEP as opposed to 2 months for those receiving MITOC (p = 0.05). Median survival was 9.4 months in patients treated with MEP compared to 5.4 months in those receiving MITOC (p = 0.05). This study indicates that the addition of cisplatin and epirubicin to MITOC results in a significant improvement in the response rate, time to treatment failure and survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site.

Prognostic factors in metastatic malignant melanoma. An analysis of 236 patients treated on clinical research studies at the Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pretoria, South Africa from 1972-1992

Prognostic factors in 236 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma were analyzed. The patients were all entered on clinical research studies at a single institution. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on data which was prospectively collected. Seven independent variables were analyzed for effect on response, time to treatment failure (TTF) and survival. Univariate analysis identified four factors which significantly effected response, TTF and survival: PS, dominant site of disease, number of sites of disease and treatment. In multivariate analyses dominant site of disease and treatment remained significant factors influencing response rates, but performance status (PS) and number of sites of metastases lost statistical significance. Treatment and number of sites were significant for TTF and treatment, PS and disease-free interval were significant for survival. The identification of prognostic factors may lead to identification of subgroups of patients who may benefit from existing treatment programs, and may allow for new treatment programs to be designed with greater insight, logic and rationale.

Granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor support in patients with acute non-lymphatic leukemia

Forty-one patients with acute non-lymphoblastic leukemia were treated between March 1990 and November 1993 with mitoxantrone, cytarabine, etoposide and granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) started on day 1. This was given as induction, consolidation and intensification treatment. A complete response was obtained in 26 of 41 (63%) patients. The median survival of the 25 evaluable patients in complete remission was 18 months. The median duration to neutropenia < 500/microliter was 20 days during induction, 15 days during consolidation, 21 days during first intensification and 25 days during second intensification. Mitoxantrone, cytarabine and etoposide given with GM-CSF gave a complete response rate and median survival similar to other combination treatments but there was no definite evidence that the duration of neutropenia was reduced by the addition of GM-CSF from the start of treatment.

Cisplatin versus cisplatin plus D-Trp-6-LHRH in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a pilot trial to investigate the effect of the addition of a GnRH analogue to cisplatin

Thirty-four patients with histologically confirmed ovarian cancer were entered into a pilot study. Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin alone or cisplatin plus D-Trp-6-LHRH(decapeptyl). Objective response (complete and partial response) was documented in 9 of 14 patients on cisplatin and in 12 of 18 patients on cisplatin plus decapeptyl. Median time to treatment failure and median survival times were the same in the two treatment regimens. Toxicities were similar in the two treatment arms, except for hot flashes which only occurred in patients on cisplatin plus decapeptyl.

A randomised study of CGS 16949A (fadrozole) versus tamoxifen in previously untreated postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Fadrozole, a potent, highly specific inhibitor of aromatase activity, has only been used as second-line therapy in treatment of post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. A prospectively randomised study was therefore undertaken to compare relative clinical efficacy of fadrozole as first-line treatment to that of tamoxifen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty postmenopausal women who had not received prior treatment for advanced/metastatic breast cancer were randomised to receive either fadrozole, 1 mg twice daily, or tamoxifen, 20 mg daily.

RESULTS

Toxicity was not statistically different on the two treatment arms. Only mild to moderate toxicity was documented: hot flashes in 37%, headaches in 6.5%, mild fatigue in 2.6%. There were also no statistically significant differences in objective response rates, survival or time to treatment failure (TTF). Objective response rate on fadrozole was 50% (complete response (CR) 8.3% and partial response (PR) 42%). On tamoxifen objective response was 44.7% (CR 21% and PR 24%). Median TTF was 4.9 months on fadrozole and 5 months on tamoxifen. Median survival was 22.7 months on fadrozole and 27.5 months on tamoxifen.

CONCLUSION

While response rates, survival and TTF were not statistically significantly different, there were more complete responses on tamoxifen and duration of objective response (CR + PR) was significantly longer in the patients treated with tamoxifen.

Fludarabine: a phase II trial in patients with previously treated low-grade lymphoma

The aim of the study was to investigate the therapeutic activity of Fludarabine in patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (LG-NHL) no longer responding to standard treatment. In this Phase II study patients were treated with Fludarabine 25 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days repeated at 28-day intervals. Twenty-two patients with LG-NHL, no longer responding to standard treatment, were entered in the study. Among twenty-one evaluable patients, seven had a complete and six a partial response. The median time to treatment failure and survival time are 4.6 months and >28.0 months, respectively. The most important toxicity was hemogram suppression, which was usually manageable but occasionally severe. Fludarabine is not only an active agent with definite therapeutic value in patients with treatment-resistant LG-NHL, but effective and well tolerated in patients no longer responding to standard treatment.

A phase II trial of fludarabine in patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate fludarabine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) not responding to standard treatment.

DESIGN SETTING

Fludarabine was administered for 5 consecutive days and repeated 4-weekly.

SUBJECTS

Seventeen patients at a single institution were treated.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Objective remission was seen in 11 patients. The median survival time was 356 days.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Fludarabine is an effective treatment for patients with advanced CLL.

Treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma

The incidence of malignant melanoma continues to rise exponentially and it is estimated that 7000 people will die of metastatic malignant melanoma annually. Conventional chemotherapy, immunological and/or biological therapies and novel combinations are being studied intensively in an effort to improve the dismal outcome for patients with this disease. This review deals with recently published studies and the state of the art of the treatment available for metastatic malignant melanoma.

Antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron in patients failing previous antiemetic therapy

Tropisetron was studied for efficacy and safety in 164 patients who were refractory to other antiemetic agents. 5 mg tropisetron was given intravenously, followed by 5 mg by mouth per day for 4 days. Complete prevention of nausea and vomiting was documented in 42% of patients on day 1 of cycle 1. Delayed nausea and vomiting were prevented in 41% in the first cycle. The antiemetic control did not decrease with subsequent cycles. Side effects ascribed to tropisetron were mild.

Experience with interferon alpha 2b combined with dacarbazine in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma

A prospectively randomized trial was undertaken to compare dacarbazine (DTIC) alone with DTIC plus interferon in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Of the 73 patients who entered on the study, 36 were randomized to receive DTIC alone and 37 were randomized to receive the combination DTIC plus interferon. The two sections were well balanced. There was more toxicity on the combination section, but no life threatening toxicity. The overall response rate for patients on DTIC was 20% (two complete and five partial responses) (95% CI 7-39%) and for patients on DTIC plus interferon was 50% (13 complete and four partial responses) (95% CI 26-72%) (p = 0.007). The median time to treatment failure, was significantly more in favour of the combination treatment (9 versus 2.5 months; p < 0.01, Mantel-Cox). The median survival of 16.7 versus 8 months was in favor of the combination treatment (p < 0.01). The reasons for the improved results with the combination treatment are discussed. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group is currently, based on the results of this study, investigating the role of interferon combinations in metastatic malignant melanoma.

Recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of cancer-related anaemia

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (rh-EPO) in patients with cancer-related anaemia. Thirty-six ambulatory patients who had malignant neoplasms and haemoglobin (Hb) values of < 11 g/dl (Pretoria is 1,310 m above sea level) entered the study. Patients with renal insufficiency or anaemia caused by bleeding or haemolysis, and patients with iron deficiency or megaloblastic anaemia, were not entered in the study. 22 IU/kg rh-EPO was given subcutaneously 3 times/week. The dose was escalated if Hb values did not rise after 4 weeks. All 36 patients were evaluable for toxicity. Side effects ascribed to rh-EPO were pain or discomfort at the site of injection (12 patients), heart palpitations (3 patients), skin rash (2 patients) and hypertension, deep vein thrombosis, and myalgia in 1 patient each. Thirty of the 36 patients who entered the study were evaluable for response. There were 16 females and 14 males among the evaluable patients. Median age was 64.5 years. Response, defined as an increase of Hb of at least 2 g/dl or to 12.5 g/dl, for at least 1 month, was documented in 12 patients. This was accompanied by an improvement in performance status and occurred within 1 month in 5 of the 12 patients who responded. rh-EPO has a limited but measurable therapeutic value for patients with cancer-associated anaemia.

Phase II trial of fotemustine in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma

Fotemustine is a novel chloroethylnitrosourea, that readily penetrates the blood brain barrier. Preliminary French studies reported encouraging results with fotemustine in patients with cerebral metastases of malignant melanoma. Thirty-one patients with histologically confirmed metastatic malignant melanoma were entered on a phase II trial. The treatment regimen consisted of fotemustine, administered intravenously as a rapid infusion, at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 to 5 weeks. Objective response (CR + PR) was documented in 3 patients. Median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 44 days and median survival was 164 days. Life threatening toxicity did not occur; hematological toxicity and nausea and vomiting were the most common toxicities. Despite a somewhat disappointing response rate, objective responses were documented in patients with cerebral metastases. Since no other chemotherapeutic agent has shown therapeutic efficacy in cerebral metastases from malignant melanoma fotemustine therefore warrants further study.

Reinduction with the same cytostatic treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

To investigate the therapeutic value of reinduction with the same cytostatic treatment that had been used in induction treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred six women with metastatic breast cancer were given dibromodulcitol (mitolactol), doxorubicin, vincristine, tamoxifen, and fluoxymesterone (DAVTH) for 6 months of induction treatment, then randomized to receive one of two chemotherapy regimens if they had obtained an induction partial response (PR) or no change (NC), or to receive observation versus chemotherapy if they had obtained an induction complete response (CR). Patients were then retreated with DAVTH reinduction after relapse.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were eligible or had minor reasons for ineligibility. Severe or life-threatening toxicity was documented in 46%, and lethal toxicity in 4%. Eighteen percent had a response on reinduction (zero of 16 induction nonresponders, 15% induction PR, 44% induction CR). The median time to treatment failure (TTF) from reinduction was 3 months, and the median survival duration from reinduction was 14 months. In a logistic model, factors associated with more reinduction responses were observation after induction CR (P = .002) and age greater than 55 years (P = .04). Time since induction was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Reinduction of response after treatment failure remains a therapeutic problem. The need for better salvage treatment underlines the importance of developing new regimens.

FIVB plus GM-CSF in metastatic colorectal cancer

The response rate of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the 4-drug combination [5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), dacarbazine, vincristine and bis-chloronitrosourea given 5 weekly (FIVB)] was better than the response rate to 5-FU. The dose limiting toxicity of the FIVB was myelosuppression. The present study investigates the effect of FIVB given with GM-CSF so that drug cycles could be given every 4 weeks. Thirty-five ambulatory patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with FIVB plus GM-CSF 4 weekly. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Among the 163 cycles given only 4 were delayed because of leucopenia and 8 cycles were delayed because of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. A 50% dose reduction was given to 10 patients who had Grade 2 and 3 GI toxicity. Four of the 35 patients developed thromboembolic complications, 2 of which were lethal. Two patients were not evaluable for response as they were removed from study early because of toxicity. There were 2 complete responses and 6 partial responses. The median time to treatment failure was 3.8 months and median survival time 9.9 months. The addition of GM-CSF to FIVB decreased the expected leucopenia allowing drug treatment to be given 4 weekly to most patients. GI toxicity was dose limiting. Despite the increased dose intensity that could be delivered (to two thirds of patients), response rates were not definitely increased, no survival benefit was seen and important thromboembolic complications occurred.

Combined modality treatment of gastrointestinal cancer

During the past year, little of finite value has been published to change the approach to combined treatment modalities for the patient with gastrointestinal cancer. The value of adding other modalities to surgery to improve the cure rate has been marginal. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment appear to be making inroads into the treatment of esophagus cancer, and newer development of less toxic treatment offers promise for the future. In stomach cancer, combined modality treatment is only of value for patients with locally advanced disease. In the United States, adjuvant chemotherapy is accepted as being of value for patients with colon cancer, and adjuvant treatment with both radiotherapy and chemotherapy is considered to be best for patients with surgically treatable rectum cancer. Primary liver cancer continues to offer a challenge for combined modality treatment, but a call for prospective, randomized control trials seems to be in order.

Postmenopausal breast cancer. Drug therapy in the 1990s

In summarising current drug treatment strategies for postmenopausal women with breast cancer, it is essential to emphasise that we are dealing with a group of diseases that are treatable, and that appropriate treatment decisions will give longer disease-free intervals for patients with early breast cancer, and better control with better survival for patients with advanced (i.e. locally advanced and/or metastatic) disease. Women greater than 65 years of age have a predictably better response to hormone treatment versus women less than 65 years of age. Hormone treatment may, therefore, be considered as primary treatment or as adjuvant treatment after limited surgery. Hormone treatment is also the treatment of first choice for elderly patients with advanced disease. For middle-aged women (45 to 65 years of age), various patient factors are important in predicting the value of treatment. Estrogen receptor (ER) status is prognostic of survival irrespective of treatment. Patients with ER-positive disease have a better prognosis than those with ER-negative disease, both in the adjuvant setting and in the face of metastatic disease. This is because ER-positive tumours tend to grow slower. The availability of the serotonin type 3 (5-hydroxytryptamine;5-HT3) antagonists, which effectively control nausea and vomiting in most patients, make chemotherapy combinations more acceptable, and combination chemotherapy can more readily be considered as first treatment option both as adjuvant treatment and for treatment of advanced disease. For patients with organ metastases there is no doubt that combined chemotherapy treatment is indicated.

A randomized trial of mitomycin-C (M) versus mitomycin-C plus high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MMPA) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer

Seventy-six women with previously treated breast cancer were randomized to receive mitomycin (M) or M plus high-dose oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MMPA). Patients were balanced with respect to age, performance status, hormone receptor status, previous treatment, and number of metastatic sites. There were more patients with visceral metastases in the M arm of the study. Side effects were tolerable and not significantly different for the two regimens. No life-threatening toxicity occurred. Objective response was documented in 4 of 37 patients on M and 11 of 39 on MMPA. On M the median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 3 months, and median survival was 7.8 months. On MMPA the median TTF was 4.4 months, and median survival was 9.7 months. There was a tendency for higher response and longer TTF and survival on MMPA, but statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.09).

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and fluorouracil (CAF) plus depo-buserelin in the treatment of premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer

A phase II study was undertaken to assess the effect of CAF plus depo-buserelin, as first-line treatment, in premenopausal women with breast cancer. Of 66 patients entered 60 are eligible and evaluable; their median age was 45, estrogen receptor (ER) was positive in 9, negative in 11 and unknown in 40. The median disease free interval (DFI) was 11 months. Metastatic sites were visceral in 14, bone in 34 and soft tissue in 37. Twenty-nine patients had metastatic disease of one site, while 31 had 2-4 sites. An objective response of 82% was documented (29 complete responders and 20 partial responders). Median time to treatment failure was 11.5 months and median survival 37 months. Most commonly encountered side effects attributable to CAF were alopecia, nausea and vomiting, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. Side effects attributable to buserelin were hot flashes. After one cycle baseline mean serum estradiol fell from premenopausal levels to postmenopausal levels. This study showed that CAF plus buserelin is well tolerated, with a very high response rate in selected premenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer.

An extended phase II trial of ifosfamide plus mesna in malignant mesothelioma

Forty three patients with histologically confirmed malignant mesothelioma were entered onto an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group phase II study of ifosfamide given with mesna. Eligibility criteria included adequate performance status, hemogram and renal functions. Ifosfamide was given at 1.5 g/m2 in 200 ml of normal saline over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion on days 1 to 5 of each 21 day cycle. Mesna was given at 300 mg/m2 on each day of ifosfamide at 0, 4 and 8 hours. Two patients were cancelled and one patient was ineligible. The most common toxicity was haematologic. More than 50% of the patients had at least one episode of severe or life threatening toxicity and 2 patients had lethal toxicity (1 renal and 1 pulmonary oedema attributed to treatment), and an additional 4 patients died while on study (2 of cardiac and 2 of cerebral vascular disease not considered directly related to treatment). Of the 40 eligible patients one was unevaluable for response, and one patient had a partial response lasting 6.3 months. Twenty four patients had a no change status with a median duration of 5 months. The median time to treatment failure for all eligible patients was 2.5 months. The median overall survival time (from registration) for all eligible patients was 6.9 months. In multi variable models, factors that predicted for a statistically significant poorer survival were age > or = 62, stage > or = 3, performance status poorer than 0 to 1 and prior surgery (i.e.: more than biopsy).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)