Evaluating the Effects of a Medication Adherence Packaging Program on Outcomes in Older People

Objective To determine the impact of an adherence packaging and medication synchronization program on hospital visits for older people living independently in the community. Design A retrospective pre-post study that evaluated patient outcomes over a 24-month period was conducted. Patient-specific socio-demographic, medical, and hospital visit-related data were collected for 12 months before and after patient enrollment in the adherence packaging program. Setting The study was conducted at Rx Partners LTC, LLC, a University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) pharmacy in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Participants Patients 65 years of age or older, of any gender, with UPMC Health Plan insurance coverage, who enrolled in the adherence packaging program between July 2019 and December 2019. Intervention Enrollment in the adherence packaging program included medication synchronization and packaging in prefilled medication sets delivered to the patient's home monthly. Monthly medication reconciliation and review by clinical pharmacists was an included value-added service. Results Of the 92 patients included in the analysis, 60 had hospital visits during their pre-enrollment period for a total of 146 visits, compared with 54 patients in the postenrollment period totaling 126 visits; however, the mean rate of hospital visits was not statistically significant (1.59 versus 1.37; P = 0.48). Pharmacists prevented 1.87 medication errors/patient in the postenrollment setting. Conclusion Enrollment in the program was associated with fewer hospital visits, though not statistically significant, and pharmacists had abundant opportunity to prevent medication errors and optimize regimens. Further evaluation is warranted in a larger cohort.

Older People and Acute Kidney Injury: A Student Perspective on Medication Changes During Hospital Admission and Transitions of Care Follow-Up

Older people are particularly susceptible to acute kidney injury (AKI) for a variety of reasons. Because of this, medication changes during admission and transitions of care follow-up are often necessary to ensure the safety of these patients. The American Geriatrics Society's Beers Criteria provide guidance for select medications that are potentially inappropriate in the older adult population. However, other medications, particularly those for cardiovascular disease and diabetes that are not included in the kidney function-specific section of the Beers Criteria (Table 6), can sometimes be overlooked. This manuscript will provide insight to both pharmacists and student pharmacists on the importance of being vigilant for medications that may need dosage adjustment during episodes of AKI. As interns in the outpatient setting, pharmacy students can provide education to patients and their families in order to ensure these medications are being taken correctly and are properly restarted if their discontinuation was intended for only a short time.

Transitions of Care: A Student Perspective on the Value of Current Successes and Growth Opportunities in the PharmD Curriculum

Transitions of care (TOC) is becoming an essential component of pharmacy practice, and requires problem solving that is difficult to learn in the classroom. My unique experience of interning in community and inpatient settings along with doing my own TOC research with geriatric patients has allowed me to see patients throughout the spectrum of health care, and how discrepancies arise as they move between settings. This manuscript will provide insight to pharmacy students about why TOC is a critical area for pharmacist involvement, and how we must be prepared to guide patients through these transitions as we become new practitioners.

Transitions of Care: A Student Perspective on the Value of Current Successes and Growth Opportunities in the PharmD Curriculum

Transitions of care (TOC) is becoming an essential component of pharmacy practice, and requires problem solving that is difficult to learn in the classroom. My unique experience of interning in community and inpatient settings along with doing my own TOC research with geriatric patients has allowed me to see patients throughout the spectrum of health care, and how discrepancies arise as they move between settings. This manuscript will provide insight to pharmacy students about why TOC is a critical area for pharmacist involvement, and how we must be prepared to guide patients through these transitions as we become new practitioners.

A Geriatric Pharmacy Resident's Clinical and Educational Activities During Weekly interprofessional Team Meetings

OBJECTIVES: To describe and gather further details about the clinical and educational activities that were documented by the geriatric pharmacist resident during both weekly interprofessional Acute Care for the Elderly (ACE) rounds as well as bedside patient counseling. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review (quality improvement project). SETTING: Inpatient geriatric service at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). PATIENTS: Medical learners selected one complex patient from the geriatric service for ACE rounds each week. ACTIVITIES: The geriatric pharmacist resident provided clinical information and medication education to the interprofessional team and to the patient and/or family at their bedside. Activities were documented in a newly developed template. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, medication categories, discrepancies and dosing changes, time-in-rounds, and team members. RESULTS: De-identified data from 18 patients (72.2% female, average age 82.5 ± 9.18 years) over a 6-month period were collected and analyzed. The geriatric pharmacist resident provided most education to the team on antibiotics, antidepressants, over-thecounters (OTCs), and prescription pain medications during ACE rounds. They provided most education to the patient/family on prescription pain medications, antidepressants, OTCs, and anticoagulants. The pharmacist resident identified 38 medication discrepancies (72.2% of patients had ≥ 1 discrepancy, range 0-7) and clinically significant drug-drug interactions in 15 patients. The pharmacist resident recommended dosing changes in 12 patients and therapeutic alternatives in 11 patients. The ACE rounds lasted on average 26.6 [± 6.42] minutes and included medicine, pharmacy, social work, nurse case management, nursing, and nutrition and rehabilitative services when necessary. CONCLUSION: The results provide insight into both the clinical and educational activities of the geriatric pharmacist resident in support of interprofessional rounds.

Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Dosing and Monitoring in Two Geriatric Outpatient Clinics

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) prescribed to elderly patients in an outpatient setting, specifically evaluating if Food and Drug Administration (FDA) -approved dosing recommendations are followed.<br/> DESIGN: This study was a retrospective quality improvement project.<br/> SETTING: This study was conducted at geriatric hospital-based primary care clinics at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), UPMC Senior Care Institute and UPMC Benedum Geriatric Center.<br/> PATIENTS: Subjects included were 65 years of age or older; had an office visit at UPMC Senior Care Institute or UPMC Benedum Geriatric Center from September 1, 2015, to August 31, 2017; and had a DOAC on their home medications.<br/> INTERVENTIONS: Data were obtained through retrospective chart review.<br/> MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the appropriateness of dosing of DOACs based on FDA-labeled recommendations.<br/> RESULTS: Of 232 patients included in analysis, 42.7% were found to have dosing inconsistent with FDAlabeled recommendations (47.3% apixaban, 35.8% rivaroxaban, and 31.6% dabigatran). No patients were prescribed edoxaban. The majority (72.7%) were dosed lower than FDA-recommended doses. Of all patients, the most frequent parameter (54.5%) for inappropriate dosing was patients meeting only 1 of 3 dose-reduction criteria when prescribed reduced-dose apixaban. Geriatrician and nongeriatrician prescribers had similar rates of prescribing DOACs with doses inconsistent with FDA-labeled recommendations (44.0% vs. 40.8%; P = 0.62).<br/> CONCLUSION: Results suggest that DOACs used in outpatient geriatric patients are frequently dosed inconsistent with FDA-approved dosing recommendations. Further research is needed regarding clinical outcomes in older patients receiving DOACs and in those with dose adjustments inconsistent with FDA-labeled recommendations.<br/>.

Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Dosing and Monitoring in Two Geriatric Outpatient Clinics

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) prescribed to elderly patients in an outpatient setting, specifically evaluating if Food and Drug Administration (FDA) -approved dosing recommendations are followed.<br/> DESIGN: This study was a retrospective quality improvement project.<br/> SETTING: This study was conducted at geriatric hospital-based primary care clinics at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), UPMC Senior Care Institute and UPMC Benedum Geriatric Center.<br/> PATIENTS: Subjects included were 65 years of age or older; had an office visit at UPMC Senior Care Institute or UPMC Benedum Geriatric Center from September 1, 2015, to August 31, 2017; and had a DOAC on their home medications.<br/> INTERVENTIONS: Data were obtained through retrospective chart review.<br/> MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the appropriateness of dosing of DOACs based on FDA-labeled recommendations.<br/> RESULTS: Of 232 patients included in analysis, 42.7% were found to have dosing inconsistent with FDAlabeled recommendations (47.3% apixaban, 35.8% rivaroxaban, and 31.6% dabigatran). No patients were prescribed edoxaban. The majority (72.7%) were dosed lower than FDA-recommended doses. Of all patients, the most frequent parameter (54.5%) for inappropriate dosing was patients meeting only 1 of 3 dose-reduction criteria when prescribed reduced-dose apixaban. Geriatrician and nongeriatrician prescribers had similar rates of prescribing DOACs with doses inconsistent with FDA-labeled recommendations (44.0% vs. 40.8%; P = 0.62).<br/> CONCLUSION: Results suggest that DOACs used in outpatient geriatric patients are frequently dosed inconsistent with FDA-approved dosing recommendations. Further research is needed regarding clinical outcomes in older patients receiving DOACs and in those with dose adjustments inconsistent with FDA-labeled recommendations.<br/>

Clinical Research That Matters: Designing Outcome-Based Research for Older Adults to Qualify for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Though older adults are more sensitive to the effects of medications than their younger counterparts, they are often excluded from manufacturer-based clinical studies. Practice-based research is a practical method to identify medication-related effects in older patients. This research also highlights the role of a pharmacist in improving care in this population. A single study rarely has strong enough evidence to change geriatric practice, unless it is a large-scale, multisite, randomized controlled trial that specifically targets older adults. It is important to design studies that may be used in systematic reviews or meta-analyses that build a stronger evidence base. Recent literature has documented a gap in advanced pharmacist training pertaining to research skills. In this paper, we hope to fill some of the educational gaps related to research in older adults. We define best practices when deciding on the type of study, inclusion and exclusion criteria, design of the intervention, how outcomes are measured, and how results are reported. Well-designed studies increase the pool of available data to further document the important role that pharmacists have in optimizing care of older patients.

2018 American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Annual Meeting & Exhibition

Poster abstracts are evaluated based on the following criteria: significance of the problem to healthy aging or medication management; innovativeness of ideas, methods, and/or approach; methodological rigor of methods and approach; presentation of finding; implications identified for future research, practice, and/or policy; and clarity of writing. Submissions are not evaluated through the peer-reviewed process used by The Consultant Pharmacist. Industry support is indicated, where applicable. Presenting author is in italics. The poster abstract presentation is supported by the ASCP Foundation.

Medication Use and Control of Urination Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the use of medications with urological activity (UA) is associated with self-reported difficulty in control of urination. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study using data from the Duke Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly. Results: Difficulty holding urine was reported by 49.5% of men and 54.0% of the women. Overall, 50.9% of men and 72.7% of the women took one or more medications with UA. Multivariable logistic regression for men revealed that neither use of any medication with UA (Adjusted [Adj.] Odds Ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.50) nor the number of medications with UA used was associated with urinary difficulties (Adj. OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.97-1.21). For women, there was a significant association (p < .05) between use of any medication with UA and reported urinary difficulty (Adj. OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.05-1.62). Discussion: Medications with UA may be related to difficulty in controlling urine among community-dwelling elderly women.

Antihypertensive drug class use and differential risk of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling older women

BACKGROUND

Medication use is a potentially reversible cause of urinary incontinence (UI). The objective of this longitudinal cohort study was to evaluate whether self-reported UI in community-dwelling older women is associated with the use of different classes of antihypertensive agents.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 959 black and white women aged 72-81 years without baseline (Year 1) UI from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Use of any antihypertensive from 10 drug classes (ie, alpha blockers [central], alpha blockers [peripheral], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptor blockers, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics [loop], diuretics [potassium-sparing], diuretics [thiazide], and vasodilators) was determined during Year 3 in-person interviews. The number of unique antihypertensive agents used and the standardized daily dosage were also examined. Self-reported UI, operationally defined as leaking urine at least weekly during the previous 12 months, was assessed at Year 4 visits.

RESULTS

A total of 197 women (20.5%) reported UI at Year 4. Although any antihypertensive use, number of agents used, and standardized daily dosage at Year 3 were not associated with UI at Year 4, use of one particular drug class-peripheral alpha blockers (ie, doxazosin, prazosin, and terazosin)-was associated with fourfold greater odds of UI (adjusted odds ratio = 4.47; 95% confidence interval = 1.79-11.21; p = .0014). Further, in post hoc analyses, these odds nearly doubled in those also taking loop diuretics (adjusted odds ratio = 8.81; 95% confidence interval = 1.78-43.53; p = .0076).

CONCLUSION

In community-dwelling older women, peripheral alpha blocker use was associated with UI, and the odds nearly doubled when used with loop diuretics.

Prevalence of potentially preventable unplanned hospitalizations caused by therapeutic failures and adverse drug withdrawal events among older veterans

Background. Studies of drug-related hospitalizations have focused on adverse drug reactions, but few data are available on therapeutic failures (TFs) and adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs) leading to hospitalization among community-dwelling older adults. Thus, we sought to describe the prevalence of unplanned hospitalizations caused by TFs and ADWEs. In addition, we evaluated factors associated with these events in a nationally representative sample of older Veterans. Methods. This study included 678 randomly selected unplanned hospitalizations of older (age ≥ 65 years) Veterans between December 1, 2003, and November 9, 2006. The main outcomes were hospitalizations caused by a TF and/or an ADWE as determined by a pair of health professionals from review of medication charts and application of the Therapeutic Failure Questionnaire and/or Naranjo ADWE algorithm, respectively. Preventability (ie, medication error) of the admission was also assessed. Results. Thirty-four TFs and eight ADWEs involving 54 drugs were associated with 40 (5.9%) Veterans' hospitalizations; of these admissions, 90.0% (36/40) were rated as potentially preventable mostly due to medication nonadherence and suboptimal prescribing. The most common TFs that occurred were heart failure exacerbations (n = 8), coronary heart disease symptoms (n = 6), tachyarrhythmias (n = 3), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (n = 3). Half (4/8) of the ADWEs that occurred were cardiovascular in nature. Multivariable logistic regression modeling indicated that black Veterans (adjusted odds ratio 2.92, 95% CI 1.25-6.80) were significantly more likely to experience a TF-related admission compared with white Veterans. Conclusions. TF-related unplanned hospitalizations occur more frequently than ADWE-related admissions among older Veterans. Almost all TFs and/or ADWEs are potentially preventable.

Prevalence of unplanned hospitalizations caused by adverse drug reactions in older veterans

OBJECTIVES

To describe the prevalence of unplanned hospitalizations caused by adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in older veterans and to examine the association between this outcome and polypharmacy after controlling for comorbidities and other patient characteristics.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Six hundred seventy-eight randomly selected unplanned hospitalizations of older (aged ≥ 65) veterans between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2006.

MEASUREMENTS

Naranjo ADR algorithm, ADR preventability, and polypharmacy (0-4, 5-8, and ≥9 scheduled medications).

RESULTS

Seventy ADRs involving 113 drugs were found in 68 (10%) hospitalizations of older veterans, of which 25 (36.8%) were preventable. Extrapolating to the population of more than 2.4 million older veterans receiving care during the study period, 8,000 hospitalizations may have been unnecessary. The most common ADRs that occurred were bradycardia (n = 6; beta-blockers, digoxin), hypoglycemia (n = 6; sulfonylureas, insulin), falls (n = 6; antidepressants, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), and mental status changes (n = 6; anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines). Overall, 44.8% of veterans took nine or more outpatient medications and 35.4% took five to eight. Using multivariable logistic regression and controlling for demographic, health-status, and access-to-care variables, polypharmacy (≥9 and 5-8) was associated with greater risk of ADR-related hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.43-10.61 and AOR = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.03-7.85, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ADRs, determined using a validated causality algorithm, are a common cause of unplanned hospitalization in older veterans, are frequently preventable, and are associated with polypharmacy.

Analgesic use for knee and hip osteoarthritis in community-dwelling elders

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence and correlates of non-opioid and opioid analgesic use and descriptively evaluate potential undertreatment in a sample of community-dwelling elders with symptomatic knee and/or hip osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study.

PATIENTS

Six hundred and fifty-two participants attending the year 6 visit (2002-03) with symptomatic knee and/or hip OA.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Analgesic use was defined as taking ≥1 non-opioid and/or ≥1 opioid receptor agonist. Non-opioid and opioid doses were standardized across all agents by dividing the daily dose used by the minimum effective analgesic daily dose. Inadequate pain control was defined as severe/extreme OA pain in the past 30 days from a modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

RESULTS

Just over half (51.4%) reported taking at least one non-opioid analgesic and approximately 10% was taking an opioid, most (88.5%) of whom also took a non-opioid. One in five participants (19.3%) had inadequate pain control, 39% of whom were using <1 standardized daily dose of either a non-opioid or opioid analgesic. In adjusted analyses, severe/extreme OA pain was significantly associated with both non-opioid (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.49-3.99) and opioid (AOR = 2.64; 95% CI = 1.26-5.53) use.

CONCLUSIONS

Although older adults with severe/extreme knee and/or hip OA pain are more likely to take analgesics than those with less severe pain, a sizable proportion takes less than therapeutic doses and thus may be undertreated. Further research is needed to examine barriers to optimal analgesic use.

The effect of medication use on urinary incontinence in community-dwelling elderly women

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether use of certain medications with potential urological effects is associated with development of incident urinary incontinence in community-resident older women.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Pittsburgh, PA, and Memphis, TN.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine hundred fifty-nine healthy black and white women aged 65 and older enrolled in the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study without baseline (Year 1) self-reported urinary incontinence.

MEASUREMENTS

Use of alpha blockers, anticholinergics, central nervous system medications (opioids, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, antipsychotics), diuretics (thiazide, loop, potassium sparing), and estrogen (all dosage forms) was determined during Year 3 interviews. Self-reported incident (≥ weekly) incontinence in during the previous 12 months was assessed at Year 4 interviews.

RESULTS

Overall, 20.5% of these women reported incident incontinence at Year 4 (3 years from baseline). The most common medication used with potential urological activity was a thiazide diuretic (24.3%), followed by estrogen (22.2%); alpha blockers were the least commonly used (2.3%). Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that current users of alpha blockers (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=4.98, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.96-12.64) and estrogen (AOR=1.60, 95% CI=1.08-2.36) had a greater risk of urinary incontinence than nonusers. There was no greater risk (P>.05) of urinary incontinence with the current use of anticholinergics, central nervous system medications, or diuretics. No statistically significant race-by-medication use interactions were found (all P>.05).

CONCLUSION

These results corroborate earlier reports that, in elderly women, use of alpha blockers or estrogens is associated with risk of self-reported incident urinary incontinence.

Central nervous system medication use and incident mobility limitation in community elders: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition study

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether CNS medication use in older adults was associated with a higher risk of future incident mobility limitation.

METHODS

This 5-year longitudinal cohort study included 3055 participants from the health, aging and body composition (Health ABC) study who were well-functioning at baseline. CNS medication use (benzodiazepine and opioid receptor agonists, antipsychotics, and antidepressants) was determined yearly (except year 4) during in-home or in-clinic interviews. Summated standardized daily doses (low, medium, and high) and duration of CNS drug use were computed. Incident mobility limitation was operationalized as two consecutive self-reports of having any difficulty walking 1/4 mile or climbing 10 steps without resting every 6 months after baseline. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were conducted adjusting for demographics, health behaviors, health status, and common indications for CNS medications.

RESULTS

Each year at least 13.9% of participants used a CNS medication. By year 6, overall 49% had developed incident mobility limitation. In multivariable models, CNS medication users compared to never users showed a higher risk for incident mobility limitation (adjusted hazard ratio (Adj. HR) 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.47). Similar findings of increased risk were seen in analyses examining dose- and duration-response relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

CNS medication use is independently associated with an increased risk of future incident mobility limitation in community dwelling elderly. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of reducing CNS medication exposure on mobility problems.

Impact of a geriatric nursing home palliative care service on unnecessary medication prescribing

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of studies concerning improvement of medication use in palliative care patients in nursing homes.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to evaluate whether a geriatric palliative care team reduced unnecessary medication prescribing for elderly veterans residing in a nursing home.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, descriptive study of patients who died while residing in a geriatric palliative care unit between August 1, 2005, and July 31, 2007. Prescribed medications were evaluated using the Unnecessary Drug Use Measure, which contains 3 items from the Medication Appropriateness Index concerning lack of indication, lack of effectiveness, and therapeutic duplication. This measure was applied at 2 time points: on transfer/admission to the palliative care unit and at the last 30-day pharmacist medication review before death. Paired t tests and McNemar tests were used to compare medication use at these 2 points.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were included in the study. The majority were male (97.8%) and white (78.7%), with a mean (SD) age of 79.7 (7.8) years. The median length of stay on the unit was 39.0 days, and the mean number of chronic medical conditions was 8.4 (4.3). At baseline, the mean number of scheduled medications was 9.7 (4.3). The number of unnecessary medications per patient decreased from a mean of 1.7 (1.5) at admission to 0.6 (0.8) at closeout (P = 0.003). The decrease was seen in all 3 categories of the Unnecessary Drug Use Measure.

CONCLUSIONS

The geriatric palliative care team was associated with a reduction in the number of unnecessary medications prescribed for older veterans in this nursing home. Future studies should evaluate the impact of decreasing unnecessary prescribing on clinical outcomes such as adverse drug reactions.

Effect of central nervous system medication use on decline in cognition in community-dwelling older adults: findings from the Health, Aging And Body Composition Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether combined use of multiple central nervous system (CNS) medications over time is associated with cognitive change.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Memphis, Tennessee.

PARTICIPANTS

Two thousand seven hundred thirty-seven healthy adults (aged > or =65) enrolled in the Health, Aging and Body Composition study without baseline cognitive impairment (modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) score > or =80).

MEASUREMENTS

CNS medication (benzodiazepine- and opioid-receptor agonists, antipsychotics, antidepressants) use, duration, and dose were determined at baseline (Year 1) and Years 3 and 5. Cognitive function was measured using the 3MS at baseline and Years 3 and 5. The outcome variables were incident cognitive impairment (3MS score <80) and cognitive decline (> or =5-point decline on 3MS). Multivariable interval-censored survival analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

By Year 5, 7.7% of subjects had incident cognitive impairment; 25.2% demonstrated cognitive decline. CNS medication use increased from 13.9% at baseline to 15.3% and 17.1% at Years 3 and 5, respectively. It was not associated with incident cognitive impairment (adjusted hazard ratio (adj HR)=1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.73-1.69) but was associated with cognitive decline (adj HR 1.37, 95% CI=1.11-1.70). Longer duration (adj HR=1.39, CI=1.08-1.79) and higher doses (>3 standardized daily doses) (adj HR=1.87, 95% CI=1.25-2.79) of CNS medications suggested greater risk of cognitive decline than with nonuse.

CONCLUSION

Combined use of CNS medications, especially at higher doses, appears to be associated with cognitive decline in older adults. Future studies must explore the effect of combined CNS medication use on vulnerable older adults.

Number and dosage of central nervous system medications on recurrent falls in community elders: the Health, Aging and Body Composition study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the risk of multiple or high doses of combined central nervous system (CNS) medication use for recurrent falls in the elderly. The study objective was to evaluate whether multiple- or high-dose CNS medication use in older adults was associated with a higher risk of recurrent (>or=2) falls.

METHODS

This longitudinal cohort study included 3,055 participants from the Health, Aging and Body Composition study who were well functioning at baseline. CNS medication use (benzodiazepine and opioid receptor agonists, antipsychotics, antidepressants) was determined annually (except Year 4) during in-person interviews. The number and summated standard daily doses (SDDs; low, medium, and high) of CNS medications were computed. Falls 1 year later were ascertained annually for 5 years.

RESULTS

For a period of 5 years, as many as 24.1% of CNS medication users took 2+ agents annually, whereas as no more than 18.9% of CNS medication users took high doses annually (3+ SDDs). Yearly, as many as 9.7% of participants reported recurrent falls. Multivariable Generalized Estimating Equation analyses showed that multiple CNS medication users compared with never users had an increased risk of sustaining 2+ falls (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-2.81). Those taking high (3+) CNS SDDs also exhibited an increased risk of 2+ falls (adjusted OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.96-4.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher total daily doses of CNS medications were associated with recurrent falls. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of reducing the number of CNS medications and/or dosage on recurrent falls.

Epidemiology of medication-related adverse events in nursing homes

BACKGROUND

Nursing home residents are prescribed more medications than patients in any other clinical setting. Although pharmacotherapy for older nursing home residents is usually safe and effective, it can lead to medication-related adverse events such as adverse drug reactions (ADRs), adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs), and therapeutic failures (TFs).

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the descriptive (incidence) and analytic (risk factor) epidemiology of medication-related adverse events occurring in nursing home residents as reported in the literature during the last 2 decades.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts was conducted for articles published in English between January 1986 and July 2006 using the following terms: adverse drug events, adverse drug reactions, adverse drug withdrawal events, aged, drug therapy, drug-related problems, medication-related problems, nursing homes, therapeutic failures, and treatment failures. The reference lists of identified articles, recent review articles, book chapters, and the authors' reference library were also searched manually.

RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in this review. Five studies described ADRs, 1 described ADWEs, and 1 described TFs. The studies of ADRs used different methods of detecting ADRs, resulting in incidence rates ranging from 1.19 to 7.26 per 100 resident-months. The single study of ADWEs reported an incidence of 2.60 per 100 resident-months. An incidence rate for the single study describing TFs could not be calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication-related adverse events are common in the nursing home setting. Additional studies are needed to enhance the detection and prevention of medication-related adverse events and to reduce their impact on residents' outcomes and health care costs.

Clinically important drug-disease interactions and their prevalence in older adults

BACKGROUND

Older adults may have decreased homeostatic reserve, have multiple chronic diseases, and take multiple medications. Therefore, they are at risk for adverse outcomes after receiving a drug that exacerbates a chronic disease.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to compile a list of clinically important drug-disease interactions in older adults, obtain the consensus of a multidisciplinary panel of geriatric health care professionals on these interactions, and determine the prevalence of these interactions in a sample of outpatients.

METHODS

This analysis included a 2-round modified Delphi survey and cross-sectional study. Possible drug-disease interactions in patients aged > or =65 years were identified through a search of the English-language literature indexed on MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1966-July 2004) using terms that included drug-disease interaction, medication errors, and inappropriate prescribing. Nine health care professionals with expertise in geriatrics (2 geriatricians, 7 geriatric clinical pharmacist specialists) were selected based on specialty training and continuing clinical work in geriatrics, academic appointments, and geographic location. The panel rated the importance of the potential drug-disease interactions using a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = definitely not serious to 5 = definitely serious). Consensus on a drug-disease interaction was defined as a lower bound of the 95% CI > or =4.0. The prevalence of drug-disease interactions was determined by applying the consensus criteria to a convenience sample of frail older veterans at hospital discharge who were enrolled in a health services intervention trial.

RESULTS

The panel reached consensus on 28 individual drug-disease interactions involving 14 diseases or conditions. Overall, 205 (15.3%) of the 1340 veterans in the sample had > or =1 drug-disease interaction. The 2 most common drug-disease interactions were use of first-generation calcium channel blockers in patients with congestive heart failure and use of aspirin in patients with peptic ulcer disease (both, 3.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

A survey of multidisciplinary geriatric health care professionals resulted in a concise consensus list of clinically important drug-disease interactions in older adults. Further research is needed to examine the impact of these drug-disease interactions on health outcomes and their applicability as national measures for the prevention of drug-related problems.

Incidence and predictors of all and preventable adverse drug reactions in frail elderly persons after hospital stay

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADR) negatively impact life quality and are sometimes fatal. This study examines the incidence and predictors of all and preventable ADRs in frail elderly persons after hospital discharge, a highly vulnerable but rarely studied population.

METHODS

The design was a prospective cohort study involving 808 frail elderly persons who were discharged from 11 Veteran Affairs hospitals to outpatient care. The main outcome measure was number of ADRs per patient as determined by blinded geriatrician and geropharmacist pairs using Naranjo's ADR algorithm. For all ADRs (possible, probable, or definite), preventability was assessed. Discordances were resolved by consensus conferences.

RESULTS

Overall, 33% of patients had one or more ADRs for a rate of 1.92 per 1000 person-days of follow-up. The rate for preventable ADRs was 0.71 per 1000 person-days of follow-up. Independent risk factors for all ADRs were number of medications (adjusted [Adj.] hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.10 per medication), use of warfarin (Adj. HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.22-1.87), and (marginally) the use of benzodiazepines (Adj. HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.95-1.58). Counterintuitively, use of sedatives and/or hypnotics was inversely related to ADR risk (Adj. HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.57). Similar trends were seen for number of medications and warfarin use as predictors of preventable ADRs.

CONCLUSIONS

ADRs are very common in frail elderly persons after hospital stay, and polypharmacy and warfarin use consistently increase the risk of ADRs.

Therapeutic Failure-Related Hospitalisations in the Frail Elderly

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Although therapeutic failure may be a common cause of drug-related morbidity in older adults, few studies have focused on this problem. The study objective was to determine the frequency and types of, and the factors associated with, therapeutic failure leading to hospitalisation in frail, elderly patients, using a new instrument named the Therapeutic Failure Questionnaire (TFQ).

METHODS

The sample included 106 frail, hospitalised elderly patients enrolled in a 1-year-long health service intervention trial at 11 Veterans Affairs Medical Centres. The TFQ was developed by a team of clinical geriatricians and tested for reliability by two clinical pharmacists and a geriatrician on a sample of 32 patients. To establish validity, a geriatrician retrospectively reviewed the computerised medication records and clinical charts for these patients and applied the TFQ to determine probable therapeutic failures at the time of hospital admission.

RESULTS

Inter- and intra-rater reliability for the TFQ were very good (kappa = 0.82 for both). Overall, 11% of patients had one or more probable therapeutic failures (TFQ scores between 4 and 7) leading to hospitalisation. Cardiopulmonary disease was a common 'indicator' of therapeutic failure and was often the result of non-adherence. The only factor associated with therapeutic failure occurrence was severe chronic kidney disease (crude odds ratio 5.87; 95% CI 1.20, 28.69; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The TFQ was able to identify several cases of probable therapeutic failure leading to hospitalisation in frail, elderly patients. Non-adherence to effective therapies for chronic serious cardiopulmonary disease was a common cause of therapeutic failure and represents a target for interventions to reduce hospitalisation. Further research on the occurrence, risk factors for and types of therapeutic failure is needed in a larger cohort of older non-veterans.

Unnecessary drug use in frail older people at hospital discharge

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence and predictors of unnecessary drug use at hospital discharge in frail elderly patients.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Eleven Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred eighty-four frail older patients from the Geriatric Evaluation and Management Drug Study.

MEASUREMENTS

Assessment of unnecessary drug use was determined by the consensus of a clinical pharmacist and physician pair applying the Medication Appropriateness Index to each regularly scheduled medication at hospital discharge. Those drugs that received an inappropriate rating for indication, efficacy, or therapeutic duplication were defined as unnecessary.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of patients had at least one unnecessary drug, with the most common reason being lack of indication. The most commonly prescribed unnecessary drug classes were gastrointestinal, central nervous system, and therapeutic nutrients/minerals. Factors associated (P<.05) with unnecessary drug use included hypertension (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.38-0.96), multiple prescribers (AOR=3.35, 95% CI=1.16-9.68), and nine or more medications (AOR=2.24, 95% CI=1.25-3.99).

CONCLUSION

A high prevalence of unnecessary drug use at discharge was found in frail hospitalized elderly patients. Additional studies are needed to identify predictors and prevalence of unnecessary drug use in nonveteran populations so that interventions can be designed to reduce the problem.

Potential Drug—Disease Interactions in Frail, Hospitalized Elderly Veterans

BACKGROUND:

Drugs can improve quality of life for many older people, but they may cause adverse health outcomes (eg, drug—disease interactions) if used inappropriately.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the prevalence of potential drug—disease interactions as defined by explicit criteria and examine associations between sociodemographic and health status variables and potential drug—disease interactions.

METHODS:

The study design was cross-sectional. We evaluated 397 frail elderly inpatients from the Geriatric Evaluation and Management trial conducted at 11 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Drug—disease interactions were defined using explicit criteria from consensus expert panels of geriatricians from the US and Canada.

RESULTS:

Overall, 159 (40.1%) patients had one or more potential drug—disease interaction. The most common potential interactions were calcium-channel blockers and heart failure (12.3%) and β-blockers and diabetes (6.8%). Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that age ⩾75 years (adjusted OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.52 to 3.88), being married (adjusted OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.11 to 2.82), comorbidity index defined by Charlson method (adjusted OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.34), and use of multiple prescription drugs (5–8: adjusted OR 4.17; 95% CI 1.96 to 8.88, ⩾9: adjusted OR 9.22; 95% CI 4.26 to 19.95), were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with having one or more potential drug—disease interaction.

CONCLUSIONS:

Potential drug—disease interactions are common in hospitalized elderly patients and are related to specific sociodemographic and health status factors. Further research is needed to examine the relationship between health outcomes and drug—disease interactions.

Adverse drug reaction risk factors in older outpatients

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common in older (age >or=65 years) outpatients (prevalence, 5%-35%), but there is no consensus on factors that put these patients at high risk for ADRs. Identifying a uniform set of risk factors would be helpful to develop risk models for ADRs for older outpatients and to implement targeted interventions for those patients at high risk for ADRs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify potential risk factors for ADRs in older outpatients through a survey of geriatric experts and to determine their prevalence.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to find published articles on ADRs in older patients. Forty-four potential risk factors were identified through the literature search and 6 additional factors were suggested by the expert panel. Through a modified 2-round survey, based on the Delphi consensus method, of an expert panel of 5 physicians and 5 pharmacists, the probability that each of these 50 potential factors could contribute independently to placing an older outpatient at high risk for an ADR was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. After the survey responses were received, means and 95% Cls were calculated. Consensus was defined as a lower 95% confidence limit >or=4.0. Potential risk factors that reached consensus were then applied to a sample of older outpatients to determine their prevalence.

RESULTS

After 2 rounds, the expert panel reached consensus on 21 factors, including 12 medication-related factors and 9 patient characteristics. The most prevalent medication-related risk factors were opioid analgesics; warfarin; non-acetylsalicylic acid, non-cyclooxygenase-2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; anticholinergics; and benzodiazepines. The most prevalent patient characteristics included polypharmacy, multiple chronic medical problems, prior ADR, and dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

An expert panel was able to reach a consensus on potential risk factors that increase the risk for ADRs in older outpatients. Many risk factors were common in a sample of older outpatients. Future research is needed to determine the predictive validity of these risk factors for ADRs in older outpatients.

Effects of geriatric evaluation and management on adverse drug reactions and suboptimal prescribing in the frail elderly

PURPOSE

To determine if inpatient or outpatient geriatric evaluation and management, as compared with usual care, reduces adverse drug reactions and suboptimal prescribing in frail elderly patients.

METHODS

The study employed a randomized 2 x 2 factorial controlled design. Subjects were patients in 11 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals who were > or =65 years old and met criteria for frailty (n = 834). Inpatient geriatric unit and outpatient geriatric clinic teams evaluated and managed patients according to published guidelines and VA standards. Patients were followed for 12 months. Blinded physician-pharmacist pairs rated adverse drug reactions for causality (using Naranjo's algorithm) and seriousness. Suboptimal prescribing measures included unnecessary and inappropriate drug use (Medication Appropriateness Index), inappropriate drug use (Beers criteria), and underuse.

RESULTS

For serious adverse drug reactions, there were no inpatient geriatric unit effects during the inpatient or outpatient follow-up periods. Outpatient geriatric clinic care resulted in a 35% reduction in the risk of a serious adverse drug reaction compared with usual care (adjusted relative risk = 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.93). Inpatient geriatric unit care reduced unnecessary and inappropriate drug use and underuse significantly during the inpatient period (P <0.05). Outpatient geriatric clinic care reduced the number of conditions with omitted drugs significantly during the outpatient period (P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with usual care, outpatient geriatric evaluation and management reduces serious adverse drug reactions, and inpatient and outpatient geriatric evaluation and management reduces suboptimal prescribing, in frail elderly patients.

Inappropriate medication use among frail elderly inpatients

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate prescribing in frail elderly inpatients has not received as much investigation as in frail elderly nursing home patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence and predictors of inappropriate prescribing for hospitalized frail elderly patients.

METHODS

The study was conducted at 11 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers and involved a sample of 397 frail elderly inpatients. Inappropriate prescribing was measured by physician-pharmacist pair's consensus ratings for 10 criteria on the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). The MAI ratings generated a weighted score of 0-18 per medication (higher score = more inappropriate) and were summed across medications to achieve a patient score.

RESULTS

Overall, 365 (91.9%) patients had > or =1 medications with > or =1 MAI criteria rated as inappropriate. The most common problems involved expensive drugs (70.0%), impractical directions (55.2%), and incorrect dosages (50.9%). The most common drug classes with appropriateness problems were gastric (50.6%), cardiovascular (47.6%), and central nervous system (23.9%). The mean +/- SD MAI score per person was 8.9 +/- 7.6. Stepwise ordinal logistic regression analyses revealed that both the number of prescription (adjusted OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.36) and nonprescription drugs (adjusted OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.29) were related to higher MAI scores. Analyses excluding the number of drugs revealed that the Charlson index (adjusted OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.35) and fair/poor self-rated health (adjusted OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.26) were related to higher MAI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Inappropriate drug prescribing is common for frail elderly veteran inpatients and is related to polypharmacy and specific health status characteristics.

Laxative use in the community-dwelling elderly

BACKGROUND

Constipation, a common and sometimes severe problem in the elderly, is often treated with laxatives.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of laxative use and identify determinants of such use among representative black and white community-dwelling elderly persons.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey of 4136 participants at baseline (1986-1987) in the Duke University Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly. Data on demographic characteristics, health status, health service use, and use of prescription and over-the-counter drugs were collected in participants' homes. Use of the following types of laxatives was examined: bulking, hyperosmotic, lubricant, stimulant, stool softener, saline, and miscellaneous agents.

RESULTS

It was found that 10.2% of participants used > or =1 laxative. Stimulants and bulking agents were the most commonly used classes. Only 11.6% of laxative users reported concurrent consumption of > or =2 laxatives. Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that laxative use was more likely in women (adjusted OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.34-2.37), those with >4 physicians visits in the previous year (adjusted OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.16-2.53), those unable to walk a half mile (adjusted OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.87), and those using > or =4 over-the-counter nonlaxative medications (adjusted OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.15-3.81). A nonsignificant association was seen between laxative use and the use of anticholinergic agents (adjusted OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.00-1.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Laxative use is common among community-dwelling elderly persons and is related to specific factors concerning sociodemographics, health status, and access to health care. Studies are needed that examine the impact of laxative use on bowel function and quality of life in the elderly.

Use of inappropriate prescription drugs by older people

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence and predictors of inappropriate drug prescribing defined by expert national consensus panel drug utilization review criteria for community-dwelling older people.

DESIGN

Survey.

SETTING

Five adjacent urban and rural counties in the Piedmont area of North Carolina.

PARTICIPANTS

A stratified random sample of participants from the fourth (n = 3,234) and seventh (n = 2,508) waves of the Duke Established Populations for Epidemiological Studies of the Elderly.

MEASUREMENTS

The prescribing appropriateness for digoxin, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, histamine(2) receptor antagonists, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and antidepressants as determined by explicit criteria (through Health Care Financing Administration expert consensus panel drug utilization review criteria for dosage, duplication, drug-drug interactions and duration, and U.S. and Canadian expert consensus panel criteria for drug-disease interactions). Multivariable analyses, using weighted data adjusted for sampling design, were conducted to assess the association between inappropriate prescribing and demographic, health-status, and access-to-healthcare factors cross-sectionally and longitudinally.

RESULTS

We found that 21.0 of the fourth wave and 19.2 of the seventh wave participants who used one or more agents from the eight drug classes had one or more elements identified as inappropriate. The therapeutic classes with the most problems were benzodiazepines and NSAIDs. The most common problems were with drug-disease interactions and duration of use. Longitudinal multivariable analyses found that participants who were white (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.67, 95 confidence interval (CI) = 1.28-2.17), were married (AOR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.01-1.93), had arthritis (AOR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.27-2.38), had one or more physical function disabilities (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.02-1.96), and had inappropriate drugs prescribed at wave 4 (AOR = 6.87, 95% CI = 5.11-9.22) were more likely to have inappropriate prescribing at wave 7.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that inappropriate prescribing is common among community-dwelling older people and persists over time. Longitudinal studies in older people are needed to examine the impact of inappropriate drug prescribing on health-related outcomes.

Epidemiology of over-the-counter drug use in community dwelling elderly: United States perspective

Among US community dwelling individuals aged > or = 65 years, about as many persons take nonprescription drugs as take prescription drugs. A review of US data from the last 2 decades indicates that the average number of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs taken daily is around 1.8, but varies with geographical area (highest in the Midwest) and race/ethnicity (lowest use among Hispanics, followed by African Americans. and highest use among Whites). Use has consistently been found to be higher in women than in men. While OTC use appears to be increasing over time, it also decreases with increase in age. The most common OTC classes used are analgesics, laxatives and nutritional supplements. Our ability to explain or to predict OTC use and change in use is poor, and further studies, particularly on use by elderly individuals of minority races, are needed.

Suboptimal prescribing in older inpatients and outpatients

Investigators searched Medline and HealthSTAR databases from January 1, 1985 through June 30, 1999 to identify articles on suboptimal prescribing in those age 65 years and older. A manual search of the reference lists from identified articles and the authors' article files, book chapters, and recent reviews was conducted to identify additional articles. The definitions for various types of suboptimal prescribing (polypharmacy, inappropriate, and underutilization) are numerous, and measurement varies from study to study. The literature suggests that suboptimal prescribing is common in older outpatients and inpatients. Moreover, there is significant morbidity and mortality associated with suboptimal prescribing for these older patients. Evidence from well-controlled studies suggests that multidisciplinary teams and clinical pharmacy interventions can modify suboptimal drug use in older people. Future research is necessary to measure and test other methods for tackling this major public health problem facing older people.