1
|
Sukrithan V, Armbruster H, Rogers S, Vogt SM, Grenade C, Verschraegen C, Zhou Y, Goyal A, Natwa M, Hussein A, Barr H, Konate D, Batdorf R, Brown A, Williams B, Zhao S, Wei L, Xu M, Shah MH, Konda B. Safety and efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors: A single center experience. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298824. [PMID: 38748739 PMCID: PMC11095666 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-dotatate is widely used for the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We analyzed data from 104 patients with NETs treated with 177Lu -dotatate at a US academic center between December 2017 and October 2020 to better understand patterns of long-term efficacy, safety, and toxicity in the real-world setting. 177Lu-dotatate (200 mCi) was administered every eight weeks for four doses. The most common sites of primary disease were small intestine NETs (n = 49, 47%), pancreatic NETs (n = 32, 31%), and lung NETs (n = 7, 7%). Twenty-seven percent had Ki-67 <3%, 49% had Ki-67 between 3-20%, and 13.5% had Ki-67 >20%. The cohort had been pretreated with a median of two prior lines of treatment. Forty percent had received prior liver-directed treatment. Seventy-four percent of patients completed all four doses of treatment. The objective response rate was 18%. The median time-to-treatment failure/death was significantly longer for small-bowel NETs when compared to pancreatic NETs (37.3 months vs. 13.2 months, p = 0.001). In a multivariate model, Ki-67, primary site, and liver tumor burden ≥50% were found to independently predict time-to-treatment failure/death. Around 40% of patients experienced adverse events of ≥grade 3 severity. Treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation of therapy happened in 10% of patients. Preexisting mesenteric/peritoneal disease was present in 33 patients; seven of these patients developed bowel-related toxicities including two grade 5 events. We also report two cases of delayed-onset minimal change nephrotic syndrome, which occurred 14 and 27 months after the last dose of PRRT. Lastly, we describe six patients who developed rapid tumor progression in the liver leading to terminal liver failure within 7.3 months from the start of PRRT, and identify potential risk factors associated with this occurrence, which will need further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vineeth Sukrithan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and Arthur G. James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Heather Armbruster
- Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Sherise Rogers
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Sherry Mori Vogt
- Division of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Cassandra Grenade
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Ohio Health, Delaware, OH, United States of America
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and Arthur G. James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Ye Zhou
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and Arthur G. James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Ashima Goyal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and Arthur G. James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Mona Natwa
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Akram Hussein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Hallie Barr
- Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Dramane Konate
- Department of Environmental Health and Safety, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Rochelle Batdorf
- Department of Environmental Health and Safety, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Andrew Brown
- Cardinal Health, Dublin, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Bonnie Williams
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Songzhu Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Lai Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Menglin Xu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and Arthur G. James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Manisha H. Shah
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and Arthur G. James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Bhavana Konda
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University and Arthur G. James Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patel S, Armbruster H, Pardo G, Archambeau B, Kim NH, Jeter J, Wu R, Kendra K, Contreras CM, Spaccarelli N, Dulmage B, Pootrakul L, Carr DR, Verschraegen C. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors for locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma: A real-world single-center retrospective review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0297531. [PMID: 38687774 PMCID: PMC11060576 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is highly curable by surgical excision or radiation. In rare cases, BCC can be locally destructive or difficult to surgically remove. Hedgehog inhibition (HHI) with vismodegib or sonidegib induces a 50-60% response rate. Long-term toxicity includes muscle spasms and weight loss leading to dose decreases. This retrospective chart review also investigates the impact of CoQ10 and calcium supplementation in patients treated with HHI drugs at a single academic medical center from 2012 to 2022. We reviewed the charts of adult patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic BCC treated with vismodegib or sonidegib primarily for progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall survival, BCC-specific survival, time to and reasons for discontinuation, overall response rate, safety and tolerability, use of CoQ10 and calcium supplements, and insurance coverage. Of 55 patients assessable for outcome, 34 (61.8%) had an overall clinical benefit, with 25 (45.4%) having a complete response and 9 (16.3%) a partial response. Stable disease was seen in 14 (25.4%) and 7 (12.7%) progressed. Of the 34 patients who responded to treatment, 9 recurred. Patients who were rechallenged with HHI could respond again. The median overall BCC-specific survival rate at 5 years is 89%. Dose reductions or discontinuations for vismodegib and sonidegib occurred in 59% versus 24% of cases, or 30% versus 9% of cases, respectively. With CoQ10 and calcium supplementation, only 17% required a dose reduction versus 42% without. HHI is highly effective for treating advanced BCC but may require dosing decreases. Sonidegib was better tolerated than vismodegib. CoQ10 and calcium supplementation can effectively prevent muscle spasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Patel
- Department of Pharmacy, The James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Heather Armbruster
- Department of Pharmacy, The James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Gretchen Pardo
- Department of Pharmacy, The James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Brianna Archambeau
- Department of Pharmacy, The James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | | | - Joanne Jeter
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | - Richard Wu
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Kari Kendra
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Carlo M. Contreras
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, Unites States of America
| | - Natalie Spaccarelli
- Department of Dermatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, Unites States of America
| | - Brittany Dulmage
- Department of Dermatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, Unites States of America
| | - Llana Pootrakul
- Department of Dermatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, Unites States of America
| | - David R. Carr
- Department of Dermatology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, Unites States of America
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiang YZ, Ma D, Jin X, Xiao Y, Yu Y, Shi J, Zhou YF, Fu T, Lin CJ, Dai LJ, Liu CL, Zhao S, Su GH, Hou W, Liu Y, Chen Q, Yang J, Zhang N, Zhang WJ, Liu W, Ge W, Yang WT, You C, Gu Y, Kaklamani V, Bertucci F, Verschraegen C, Daemen A, Shah NM, Wang T, Guo T, Shi L, Perou CM, Zheng Y, Huang W, Shao ZM. Integrated multiomic profiling of breast cancer in the Chinese population reveals patient stratification and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Nat Cancer 2024; 5:673-690. [PMID: 38347143 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-024-00725-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/30/2024]
Abstract
Molecular profiling guides precision treatment of breast cancer; however, Asian patients are underrepresented in publicly available large-scale studies. We established a comprehensive multiomics cohort of 773 Chinese patients with breast cancer and systematically analyzed their genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, radiomic and digital pathology characteristics. Here we show that compared to breast cancers in white individuals, Asian individuals had more targetable AKT1 mutations. Integrated analysis revealed a higher proportion of HER2-enriched subtype and correspondingly more frequent ERBB2 amplification and higher HER2 protein abundance in the Chinese HR+HER2+ cohort, stressing anti-HER2 therapy for these individuals. Furthermore, comprehensive metabolomic and proteomic analyses revealed ferroptosis as a potential therapeutic target for basal-like tumors. The integration of clinical, transcriptomic, metabolomic, radiomic and pathological features allowed for efficient stratification of patients into groups with varying recurrence risks. Our study provides a public resource and new insights into the biology and ancestry specificity of breast cancer in the Asian population, offering potential for further precision treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Zhou Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Ding Ma
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Jin
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Xiao
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Human Phenome Institute and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinxiu Shi
- Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Shanghai Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies (SIBPT), Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Fan Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tong Fu
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Cai-Jin Lin
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei-Jie Dai
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Cheng-Lin Liu
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shen Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guan-Hua Su
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wanwan Hou
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Human Phenome Institute and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaqing Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Human Phenome Institute and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingwang Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Human Phenome Institute and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingcheng Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Human Phenome Institute and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Greater Bay Area Institute of Precision Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Naixin Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Human Phenome Institute and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Juan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Westlake Omics (Hangzhou) Biotechnology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weigang Ge
- Westlake Omics (Hangzhou) Biotechnology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wen-Tao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao You
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yajia Gu
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Virginia Kaklamani
- Division Haematology/Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - François Bertucci
- Predictive Oncology Laboratory and Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Inserm UMR1068, CNRS UMR7258, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | | | - Anneleen Daemen
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nakul M Shah
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ting Wang
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Tiannan Guo
- Westlake Center for Intelligent Proteomics, Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China
- School of Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
- Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Leming Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Human Phenome Institute and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- International Human Phenome Institutes (Shanghai), Shanghai, China
| | - Charles M Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yuanting Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Human Phenome Institute and Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Wei Huang
- Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Shanghai Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies (SIBPT), Shanghai, China.
| | - Zhi-Ming Shao
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patel DM, Mateen R, Qaddour N, Carrillo A, Verschraegen C, Yang Y, Li Z, Sundi D, Mortazavi A, Collier KA. A Comprehensive Review of Immunotherapy Clinical Trials for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Alone or in Combination, Novel Antibodies, Cellular Therapies, and Vaccines. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:335. [PMID: 38254823 PMCID: PMC10813852 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Urothelial cancer is an immune-responsive cancer, but only a subset of patients benefits from immune checkpoint inhibition. Currently, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the combination of pembrolizumab with the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin are approved to treat patients with metastatic UC (mUC). Approval of first-line nivolumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin is expected imminently. Many treatment approaches are being investigated to better harness the immune system to fight mUC. In this review, we summarize the landmark clinical trials of ICIs that led to their incorporation into the current standard of care for mUC. We further discuss recent and ongoing clinical trials in mUC, which are investigating ICIs in combination with other agents, including chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel antibodies. Lastly, we review novel approaches utilizing bispecific antibodies, cellular therapies, and vaccines. The landscape of immunotherapy for mUC is rapidly evolving and will hopefully lead to better outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dixita M. Patel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Ruba Mateen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Franciscan Health Olympia Fields, Olympia Fields, IL 60461, USA
| | - Noor Qaddour
- Department of Internal Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, IL 60453, USA
| | - Alessandra Carrillo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Franciscan Health Olympia Fields, Olympia Fields, IL 60461, USA
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Yuanquan Yang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Zihai Li
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Debasish Sundi
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Amir Mortazavi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Katharine A. Collier
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Van Parijs H, Cecilia-Joseph E, Gorobets O, Storme G, Adriaenssens N, Heyndrickx B, Verschraegen C, Nguyen NP, De Ridder M, Vinh-Hung V. Lung-heart toxicity in a randomized clinical trial of hypofractionated image guided radiation therapy for breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1211544. [PMID: 38053657 PMCID: PMC10694354 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1211544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background TomoBreast hypothesized that hypofractionated 15 fractions/3 weeks image-guided radiation therapy (H-IGRT) can reduce lung-heart toxicity, as compared with normofractionated 25-33 fractions/5-7 weeks conventional radiation therapy (CRT). Methods In a single center 123 women with stage I-II operated breast cancer were randomized to receive CRT (N=64) or H-IGRT (N=59). The primary endpoint used a composite four-items measure of the time to 10% alteration in any of patient-reported outcomes, physician clinical evaluation, echocardiography or lung function tests, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Results At 12 years median follow-up, overall and disease-free survivals between randomized arms were comparable, while survival time free from alteration significantly improved with H-IGRT which showed a gain of restricted mean survival time of 1.46 years over CRT, P=0.041. Discussion The finding establishes TomoBreast as a proof-of-concept that hypofractionated image-guided radiation-therapy can improve the sparing of lung-heart function in breast cancer adjuvant therapy without loss in disease-free survival. Hypofractionation is advantageous, conditional on using an advanced radiation technique. Multicenter validation may be warranted. Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00459628. Registered 12 April 2007.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Van Parijs
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elsa Cecilia-Joseph
- Department of Oral Surgery, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, France
| | - Olena Gorobets
- Department of Oral Surgery, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, France
| | - Guy Storme
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nele Adriaenssens
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Claire Verschraegen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Nam P. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Howard University, Washington, DC, United States
- Department of Clinical Research, International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Mark De Ridder
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Clinical Research, International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group, Washington, DC, United States
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kwok C, Khorasanchi A, Psutka SP, Hinkley M, Dason S, Sundi D, Yang Y, Yang Y, Verschraegen C, Gross EE, Orcutt D, Yin M. Salvage lenvatinib/everolimus combination therapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor and VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1231831. [PMID: 37576889 PMCID: PMC10412983 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1231831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who have progressed after both immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) remains uncertain. Lenvatinib and everolimus (LE) are frequently used in combination as salvage therapy because of their different antitumor mechanisms, but efficacy and toxicity data in this setting are lacking. Methods We retrospectively reviewed charts from two academic centers for 71 adult mRCC patients who received LE after prior ICI and TKI exposure. We evaluated patient demographics, histology, International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group, treatment history, and toxicity details. Outcomes of interest included objective response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), ≥grade 3 toxicities, and schedule or dosage changes, which were evaluated using descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Cox proportional hazards model, and the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The median age was 64 (range 31-84). Most patients had clear cell histology (84.5%) and had undergone nephrectomy (80.3%). IMDC risks were favorable (19.7%), intermediate (int) (66.2%), poor (11.3%), and unknown (2.8%). The average ORR was 26.8%, while the median TTF was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-7.6) and the median OS was 9 months (95% CI, 7.6-12.9). Intermediate and poor IMDC risks were independently associated with a significantly worse TTF compared to favorable risk (hazard ratio (HR), 3.03, 95% CI, 1.18-7.79), as was ≥4L treatment vs. 2L/3L treatment (HR, 2.02, 95% CI, 1.08-3.8). Of the 71 patients, 57.7% had ≥grade 3 adverse events, 60% had treatment interruption, 44.3% had dose reduction, and 21% stopped treatment due to intolerance. Conclusions LE therapy is feasible but has modest efficacies following ICI/TKI treatment. Patients with favorable risk or treated earlier may have a better treatment response. These observations need to be confirmed in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Kwok
- Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Adam Khorasanchi
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Sarah P. Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Megan Hinkley
- Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Shawn Dason
- Division of Urologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Debasish Sundi
- Division of Urologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Yuanquan Yang
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Yajing Yang
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Evan E. Gross
- The University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Delaney Orcutt
- The University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Ming Yin
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Husain M, Quiroga D, Kim HG, Lenobel S, Xu M, Iwenofu H, Chen JL, Verschraegen C, Liebner D, Tinoco G. Clinical markers of immunotherapy outcomes in advanced sarcoma. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:326. [PMID: 37029351 PMCID: PMC10080913 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10758-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite immunotherapy's promise in oncology, its use for sarcoma remains challenging. There are no sarcoma-specific biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Previously, we reported our institutional experience highlighting ICI activity in 29 patients with sarcoma. In this study, we explore responses to ICI based on ICI regimen and other covariates to identify significant clinical factors in advanced sarcoma outcomes. METHODS Patients in The Ohio State University Sarcoma Clinics were enrolled in the Sarcoma Retrospective ICI database from January 1, 2015 through November 1, 2021. Data included treatment regimen (single-agent ICI or ICI + combination) along with clinical covariates. ICI + combination was further categorized into ICI + medication, ICI + radiation, ICI + surgery, or ICI + multiple (more than 2 modalities). Statistical analysis included log-rank tests and proportional hazard regression. The primary objective was to evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Of the patients in the database, 135 met inclusion criteria. We demonstrated improved OS in patients treated with ICI + combination (p = 0.014, median 64 weeks), but no effect on PFS (p = 0.471, median 31 weeks). Patients with a documented immune-related adverse event (irAE) of dermatitis had improved OS, but only in the ICI + combination cohort (p = 0.021). Patients who received single-agent ICI and whose change in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was less than 5 had an improved OS (p = 0.002); this was not seen in patients who received ICI + combination therapy (p = 0.441). There were no differences in OS based on age, gender, histology, or subcategories of ICI + combination. This was not the case for PFS; patients who received any ICI regimen and were younger than 70 had a worse PFS (p = 0.036) compared with their older counterparts in this dataset. Patients who developed an irAE, specifically colitis (p = 0.009), hepatitis (p = 0.048), or dermatitis (p = 0.003), had an improved PFS. There were no differences in PFS based on ICI regimen (or subcategories of ICI + combination), gender, histology, change in NLR, or grade of irAE. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study demonstrates that ICI + combination therapy can improve OS in some patients with advanced sarcoma. This is consistent with our prior results of ICI in sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marium Husain
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1800 Cannon Drive, Suite 1240C, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Dionisia Quiroga
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1800 Cannon Drive, Suite 1240C, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Han Gil Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1800 Cannon Drive, Suite 1240C, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Scott Lenobel
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Menglin Xu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1800 Cannon Drive, Suite 1240C, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Hans Iwenofu
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - James L Chen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1800 Cannon Drive, Suite 1240C, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1800 Cannon Drive, Suite 1240C, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David Liebner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1800 Cannon Drive, Suite 1240C, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Gabriel Tinoco
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1800 Cannon Drive, Suite 1240C, 43210, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Husain M, Chen L, Liebner D, Beane J, Rubinstein M, Pollock R, Verschraegen C, Tinoco G. Emerging Trends in Immunotherapy for Adult Sarcomas. Oncologist 2023; 28:e233-e241. [PMID: 36905579 PMCID: PMC10166169 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that arise from the oncogenic transformation of mesenchymal tissue. There are over 100 distinct STS histological and molecular subtypes with unique clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic features with variable responses to therapy regimens. Given the quality-of-life concerns and limited efficacy with current regimens, including cytotoxic chemotherapy, there is a need for novel therapies and regimens to treat advanced STS. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated significant improvements in survival outcomes in other cancer types, there remains ambiguous data on the impact of immunotherapy in sarcoma. Biomarkers like PD-1/PD-L1 are not always predictive of outcomes. Therefore, researching emerging novel therapies, such as CAR-T and adoptive cell therapies, is critical to understanding STS biology, STS tumor immune microenvironment immunomodulatory strategies that improve immune response, and survival outcomes. We discuss the underlying biology of the STS tumor immune microenvironment, immunomodulatory strategies that augment pre-existing immune responses, and novel approaches to develop sarcoma-specific antigen-based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marium Husain
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Luxi Chen
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David Liebner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joal Beane
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Surgical Oncology, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark Rubinstein
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Raphael Pollock
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Surgical Oncology, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Gabriel Tinoco
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brockwell M, Husain M, Verschraegen C, Wu R, Tinoco G. Case report: The power of immunotherapy in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1081118. [PMID: 36686737 PMCID: PMC9846513 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1081118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We describe the case of a neglected cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with extensive facial involvement. The patient is a male in his late 70s who presented to dermatology with a large destructive facial mass that had increased in size gradually over 3 years and then rapidly proliferated, consuming a large portion of his left maxillofacial region. While the immediate reaction was referral to hospice care, medical oncology recommended treatment with cemiplimab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Collaboration with multiple providers facilitated the delivery of a multidisciplinary approach utilizing immunotherapy with QUAD shot radiotherapy. The immunotherapy treatment resulted in a dramatic disease regression, but the large facial anatomical defect caused by the carcinoma remained. The patient is undergoing reconstructive surgeries. This case illustrates the potential for significant response with immune checkpoint inhibitors delivered in combination with cyclical hypofractionated radiation therapy for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, even in very advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marium Husain
- Division of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Richard Wu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Gabriel Tinoco
- Division of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States,*Correspondence: Gabriel Tinoco,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vinh-Hung V, Gorobets O, Natchagande G, Sargos P, Yin M, Nguyen NP, Verschraegen C, Folefac E. Low-Dose Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer-Longevity Over Conventional Survival Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e473-e484. [PMID: 35778336 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enzalutamide is an important drug in the treatment of prostate cancer. Standard dosing often requires dose reduction because of side effects. There is no information on survival outcomes with lower doses. We investigated the impact of starting enzalutamide at ≤ 50% dose on metastatic prostate cancer outcomes including patients' longevity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Records of metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with enzalutamide at one center were retrospectively reviewed. Low-dose enzalutamide (≤80 mg/day) was compared with standard-dose (160 mg/day). The primary objective was to compute the restricted mean survival time (RMST - time scale) and restricted mean attained age (RMAA - age scale) using the Irwin method. Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and PSA progression per PCWG3 criteria (PSA PFS). We used the logrank test and the ∆ difference between RMSTs for comparison. RESULTS Of 111 patients treated, 32 received a low-dose and 79 the standard-dose. Low-dose patients had less prior abiraterone or chemotherapy (28.1% vs. 65.8%, P < .001); more testosterone assessment (65.6% vs. 40.5%, P = .016); poorer ECOG performance status (48.3% score ≥2 vs. 26.6%; P = .040), more comorbidities (75.9% vs. 46.3%; P = .010)) including increased cardiovascular disease (51.7% vs. 21.4%, P = .004). Baseline PSA value and doubling time at start of enzalutamide and distribution of metastases were similar between the groups. OS and PFS did not differ between low-dose and standard-dose. Patients on low-dose had a better longevity with significantly longer RMAA, 89.1 years, versus standard-dose RMAA of 83.8 years (∆ = 5.3 years, P = .003, logrank P = .025). In a subgroup analysis by age at start of enzalutamide, <75 versus ≥75 years old, longevity was also better with low-dose in younger patients (∆ = 2.9 years, P = .034, and older, ∆ = 3.3 years, P = .011). CONCLUSION The longevity advantage and reduced adverse events seen in patients with prostate cancer treated with low-dose enzalutamide warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France
| | | | - Gilles Natchagande
- Centre National Hospitalier Universitaire Hubert K. MAGA, Cotonou, Benin
| | - Paul Sargos
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Ming Yin
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Edmund Folefac
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Verschraegen C, Andric Z, Moiseenko F, Makharadze T, Shevnya S, Oleksiienko A, Yañez Ruiz E, Kim S, Ahn K, Park T, Park S, Ju H, Ohe Y. Candidate Bevacizumab Biosimilar CT-P16 versus European Union Reference Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BioDrugs 2022; 36:749-760. [PMID: 36169807 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-022-00552-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CT-P16 is a candidate bevacizumab biosimilar. OBJECTIVE This double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group, phase III study aimed to establish equivalent efficacy between CT-P16 and European Union-approved reference bevacizumab (EU-bevacizumab) in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IV or recurrent nsNSCLC were randomized (1:1) to receive CT-P16 or EU-bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ≤ 6 cycles) with paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 6.0; both for 4-6 cycles), as induction therapy. Patients with controlled disease after induction therapy continued with CT-P16 or EU-bevacizumab maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) during the induction period. Time-to-event analyses, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity were also evaluated. Results obtained after 1 year of follow-up are presented. RESULTS Overall, 689 patients were randomized (CT-P16, N = 342; EU-bevacizumab, N = 347). ORR was 42.40% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.16-47.64) and 42.07% (95% CI 36.88-47.27) for CT-P16 and EU-bevacizumab, respectively. The risk difference (0.40 [95% CI - 7.02 to 7.83]) and risk ratio (1.0136 [90% CI 0.8767-1.1719]) for ORR fell within predefined equivalence margins (- 12.5 to + 12.5%, and 0.7368 to 1.3572, respectively), demonstrating equivalence between CT-P16 and EU-bevacizumab. Median response duration, time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival were comparable between treatment groups. Safety profiles were similar: 96.2% (CT-P16) and 93.0% (EU-bevacizumab) of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS Equivalent efficacy and similar pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity support bioequivalence of CT-P16 and EU-bevacizumab in patients with nsNSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03676192.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Verschraegen
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1800 Cannon Road - Lincoln Tower 1300, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Zoran Andric
- Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Dr Zorza Matea bb, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
| | - Fedor Moiseenko
- GBUZ Saint Petersburg Clinical Research Center of Specialized Types of Care (Oncology) - Hospital, Ulitsa Leningradskaya 68a Litera A, Poselok Pesochny, St Petersburg, Leningradskaya Oblast, 197758, Russian Federation
| | - Tamta Makharadze
- LTD "High Technology Hospital Medcenter", 118 Pushkini Street, Batumi, 6000, Georgia
| | - Sergii Shevnya
- Communal Nonprofit Enterprise Podilsky Regional Center of Oncology of the Vinnytsia Regional Council, 84 Khmelnytske Road, Vinnytsia, 21029, Ukraine
| | - Alona Oleksiienko
- Treatment and Diagnostic Center of LLC Specialized Clinic Prognosis Optima, 40a Vatslava Havela Boulevard, Kyiv, 03126, Ukraine
| | - Eduardo Yañez Ruiz
- Department of Internal Medicine Oncology Unit - Hematology, School of Medicine, Universidad de la Frontera, Hochstetter 298, Temuco, 4800827, Chile
| | - SungHyun Kim
- Celltrion, Inc., 23 Academy-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 22014, Republic of Korea
| | - KeumYoung Ahn
- Celltrion, Inc., 23 Academy-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 22014, Republic of Korea
| | - TaeHong Park
- Celltrion, Inc., 23 Academy-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 22014, Republic of Korea
| | - Sijin Park
- Celltrion, Inc., 23 Academy-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 22014, Republic of Korea
| | - Hana Ju
- Celltrion, Inc., 23 Academy-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 22014, Republic of Korea
| | - Yuichiro Ohe
- National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim S, Wuthrick E, Blakaj D, Eroglu Z, Verschraegen C, Thapa R, Mills M, Dibs K, Liveringhouse C, Russell J, Caudell JJ, Tarhini A, Markowitz J, Kendra K, Wu R, Chen DT, Berglund A, Michael L, Aoki M, Wang MH, Hamaidi I, Cheng P, de la Iglesia J, Slebos RJ, Chung CH, Knepper TC, Moran-Segura CM, Nguyen JV, Perez BA, Rose T, Harrison L, Messina JL, Sondak VK, Tsai KY, Khushalani NI, Brohl AS. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma: a randomised, open label, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2022; 400:1008-1019. [PMID: 36108657 PMCID: PMC9533323 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01659-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Merkel cell carcinoma is among the most aggressive and lethal of primary skin cancers, with a high rate of distant metastasis. Anti-programmed death receptor 1 (anti-PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy is currently standard of care for unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. We assessed treatment with combined nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma as a first-line therapy or following previous treatment with anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 monotherapy. METHODS In this randomised, open label, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned adults from two cancer sites in the USA (one in Florida and one in Ohio) to group A (combined nivolumab and ipilimumab) or group B (combined nivolumab and ipilimumab plus SBRT) in a 1:1 ratio. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years with histologically proven advanced stage (unresectable, recurrent, or stage IV) Merkel cell carcinoma, a minimum of two tumour lesions measureable by CT, MRI or clinical exam, and tumour tissue available for exploratory biomarker analysis. Patients were stratified by previous immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) status to receive nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks (group A) or the same schedule of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with the addition of SBRT to at least one tumour site (24 Gy in three fractions at week 2; group B). Patients had to have at least two measurable sites of disease so one non-irradiated site could be followed for response. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response per immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Response was assessed every 12 weeks. Safety was assessed in all patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03071406. FINDINGS 50 patients (25 in both group A and group B) were enrolled between March 14, 2017, and Dec 21, 2021, including 24 ICI-naive patients (13 [52%] of 25 group A patients and 11 [44%] of 25 group B patients]) and 26 patients with previous ICI (12 [48%] of 25 group A patients and 14 [56%] of 25 group B patients]). One patient in group B did not receive SBRT due to concerns about excess toxicity. Median follow-up was 14·6 months (IQR 9·1-26·5). Two patients in group B were excluded from the analysis of the primary endpoint because the target lesions were irradiated and so the patients were deemed non-evaluable. Of the ICI-naive patients, 22 (100%) of 22 (95% CI 82-100) had an objective response, including nine (41% [95% CI 21-63]) with complete response. Of the patients who had previously had ICI exposure, eight (31%) of 26 patients (95% CI 15-52) had an objective response and four (15% [5-36]) had a complete response. No significant differences in ORR were observed between groups A (18 [72%] of 25 patients) and B (12 [52%] of 23 patients; p=0·26). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 10 (40%) of 25 patients in group A and 8 (32%) of 25 patients in group B. INTERPRETATION First-line combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma showed a high ORR with durable responses and an expected safety profile. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab also showed clinical benefit in patients with previous anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 treatment. Addition of SBRT did not improve efficacy of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab represents a new first-line and salvage therapeutic option for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. FUNDING Bristol Myers Squibb Rare Population Malignancy Program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungjune Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA; Department of Immunology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
| | - Evan Wuthrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Dukagjin Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ram Thapa
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Matthew Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Khaled Dibs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Casey Liveringhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jeffery Russell
- Department of Head and Neck and Cutaneous Oncology, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jimmy J Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ahmad Tarhini
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Joseph Markowitz
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Kari Kendra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Richard Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Dung-Tsa Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Anders Berglund
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Lauren Michael
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Mia Aoki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Min-Hsuan Wang
- Department of Immunology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Imene Hamaidi
- Department of Immunology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Pingyan Cheng
- Department of Immunology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Janis de la Iglesia
- Department of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Robbert J Slebos
- Department of Head and Neck Endocrine Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Christine H Chung
- Department of Head and Neck Endocrine Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Todd C Knepper
- Department of Precision Medicine, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Carlos M Moran-Segura
- Department of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jonathan V Nguyen
- Department of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Bradford A Perez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Trevor Rose
- Department of Radiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Louis Harrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jane L Messina
- Department of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Vernon K Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Kenneth Y Tsai
- Department of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Nikhil I Khushalani
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Andrew S Brohl
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ohe Y, Bondarenko I, Andric Z, Ostapenko Y, Ciuleanu T, Moiseenko F, Makharadze T, Shevnya S, Oleksiienko A, Ruiz EY, Kim S, Ahn K, Park T, Park S, Lee J, Kim M, Verschraegen C. Abstract CT551: Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of CT-P16, a new biosimilar, to reference bevacizumab (Avastin®) in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-ct551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: CT-P16 is a proposed biosimilar to FDA approved reference bevacizumab (BV), namely Avastin®. This trial (NCT03676192) compared the efficacy and safety of CT-P16 and BV in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC.
Methods: This double blind, randomized, multicenter study randomly assigned patients to CT-P16 or BV with carboplatin and paclitaxel, up to 6 cycles (Induction Period), followed by maintenance CT-P16 or BV monotherapy until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) during the Induction Period. ORR includes complete or partial responses based on RECIST v1.1 assessed by an independent reviewer. Secondary endpoints were Quality of life (QoL), PK, safety, and immunogenicity.
Results: A total of 689 patients were randomized (CT-P16: 342, BV: 347). The baseline characteristics were well balanced. ORRs were similar between the two treatment arms and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk ratio estimate (0.7368, 1.3572) and 95% CIs for risk difference estimate (±12.5%) were within the equivalence margin in both ITT (intent-to-treat) and PP (per-protocol) sets. QoL results (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13) and PK parameter (Ctrough) were comparable between the two treatment arms. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious AEs (TESAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, and AEs leading to death was similar between the two treatment arms (96.2% vs. 92.4%, 19.4% vs. 20.1%, 15.1% vs. 14.5%, and 6.4% vs. 6.4% for the CT-P16 and BV treatment arm, respectively). The incidence of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies was comparable (14.2% vs. 16.0%).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that CT-P16 is equivalent to BV as measured by ORR in patients with metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the lung. Other endpoints including PK, QoL, safety and immunogenicity were comparable.
Primary endpoint ITT PP CT-P16 (N=342) BV (N=347) CT-P16 (N=318) BV (N=303) Independent reviewer ORR (%) 95% CI 42.40 (37.16 - 47.64) 42.07 (36.88 - 47.27) 45.28 (39.81 - 50.75) 47.19 (41.57 - 52.82) Risk ratio estimate (90% CI) 1.0136 (0.8767, 1.1719) 0.9662 (0.8387, 1.1132) Risk difference estimate (%) (95% CI) 0.40 (-7.02, 7.83) -1.90 (-9.80, 6.00) Investigator ORR (%) 95% CI 43.86 (38.60 - 49.12) 39.19 (34.06 - 44.33) 46.54 (41.06 - 52.02) 43.89 (38.31 - 49.48) Risk ratio estimate (90% CI) 1.1234 (0.9683, 1.3032) 1.0648 (0.9209, 1.2313) Risk difference estimate (%) (95% CI) 4.87 (-2.53, 12.26) 2.90 (-4.99, 10.79)
Citation Format: Yuichiro Ohe, Igor Bondarenko, Zoran Andric, Yuriy Ostapenko, Tudor Ciuleanu, Fedor Moiseenko, Tamta Makharadze, Sergii Shevnya, Alona Oleksiienko, Eduardo Yañez Ruiz, SungHyun Kim, KeumYoung Ahn, TaeHong Park, Sijin Park, JiEun Lee, MinJi Kim, Claire Verschraegen. Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of CT-P16, a new biosimilar, to reference bevacizumab (Avastin®) in patients with metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT551.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Igor Bondarenko
- 2Municipal Non-profit Enterprise "City Clinical Hospital # 4" of Dnipro City Council - PPDS, Dnipro, Ukraine
| | - Zoran Andric
- 3University Clinical Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa, Belgrade
| | | | - Tudor Ciuleanu
- 5Prof Dr I Chiricuta Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fedor Moiseenko
- 6GBUZ Saint Petersburg Clinical Research Center of Specialized Types of Care (Oncology) – Hospital, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | | | - Sergii Shevnya
- 8Commununal Noncommercial Enterprise "Podillia Regional Oncology Center of Vinnytsia Regional Council", Vinnytsia, Ukraine
| | - Alona Oleksiienko
- 9Treatment and Diagnostic Center of LLC Specialized Clinic Prognosis Optima, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | | | | | | | | | - Sijin Park
- 11Celltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - JiEun Lee
- 11Celltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - MinJi Kim
- 11Celltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hrinczenko B, Iannotti N, Goel S, Spigel D, Safran H, Taylor MH, Bennouna J, Wong DJ, Kelly K, Verschraegen C, Bajars M, Manitz J, Ruisi M, Gulley JL. Long-term avelumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: summaries and post hoc analyses from JAVELIN Solid Tumor. Future Oncol 2022; 18:1333-1342. [PMID: 35144482 PMCID: PMC9066292 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This study examined patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who received long-term avelumab (anti-PD-L1) in a large phase Ib trial (JAVELIN Solid Tumor). Methods: Patients receiving >2 years of avelumab were reviewed and exploratory descriptive analyses were conducted. Results: Individuals with varying baseline characteristics who had received up to 6 years of avelumab were reviewed. Overall, 37/340 (10.9%) had received ≥2 years of treatment; in this subgroup, best response was complete response in 5.4%, partial response in 59.5% and stable disease in 29.7%; 51.4% had continued treatment beyond disease progression. Conclusions: In this study, 11% of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer received ≥2 years of avelumab treatment and experienced prolonged response or continued clinical benefit. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT02395172 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borys Hrinczenko
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Nicholas Iannotti
- Hematology Oncology Associates of The Treasure Coast, Port St Lucie, FL 34952, USA
| | - Sanjay Goel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - David Spigel
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Howard Safran
- Life Span Cancer Institute, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Matthew H Taylor
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jaafar Bennouna
- Department of Pneumology, Thoracic Oncology Unit, Université Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Deborah J Wong
- Los Angeles Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Karen Kelly
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43221, USA
| | | | - Juliane Manitz
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | - Mary Ruisi
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | - James L Gulley
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch & Laboratory of Tumor Immunology & Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yan M, Ouyang Q, Sun T, Niu L, Yang J, Li L, Song Y, Hao C, Chen Z, Orlandi A, Ishii N, Takabe K, Franceschini G, Ricci F, Verschraegen C, Liu Z, Zhang M, Lv H, Liu L, Yang X, Xiao H, Gao Z, Li X, Dong F, Chen X, Qiao J, Zhang G. Pyrotinib plus capecitabine for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases (PERMEATE): a multicentre, single-arm, two-cohort, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:353-361. [PMID: 35085506 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00716-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Min Yan
- Henan Breast Cancer Centre, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
| | - Quchang Ouyang
- Department of Breast Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Breast Medicine, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Limin Niu
- Henan Breast Cancer Centre, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jin Yang
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Oncology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yuhua Song
- Breast Cancer Centre, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Chunfang Hao
- Department of Breast Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhanhong Chen
- Department of Breast Cancer Internal Medicine, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Armando Orlandi
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Naohiro Ishii
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Takabe
- Division of Breast Surgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Gianluca Franceschini
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | | | | | - Zhenzhen Liu
- Henan Breast Cancer Centre, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Mengwei Zhang
- Henan Breast Cancer Centre, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Huimin Lv
- Henan Breast Cancer Centre, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Liping Liu
- Department of Breast Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaohong Yang
- Department of Breast Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Huawu Xiao
- Department of Breast Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhichao Gao
- Breast Medicine, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaorui Li
- Breast Medicine, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Fangyuan Dong
- Breast Medicine, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiuchun Chen
- Henan Breast Cancer Centre, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jianghua Qiao
- Henan Breast Cancer Centre, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Guifang Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Van Parijs H, Vinh-Hung V, Fontaine C, Storme G, Verschraegen C, Nguyen DM, Adriaenssens N, Nguyen NP, Gorobets O, De Ridder M. Cardiopulmonary-related patient-reported outcomes in a randomized clinical trial of radiation therapy for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1177. [PMID: 34736429 PMCID: PMC8569957 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08916-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long-term prospective patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy is scarce. TomoBreast compared conventional radiotherapy (CR) with tomotherapy (TT), on the hypothesis that TT might reduce lung-heart toxicity. Methods Among 123 women consenting to participate, 64 were randomized to CR, 59 to TT. CR delivered 50 Gy in 25 fractions/5 weeks to breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, with a sequential boost (16 Gy/8 fractions/1.6 weeks) after lumpectomy. TT delivered 42 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks to breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, 51 Gy simultaneous-integrated-boost in patients with lumpectomy. PRO were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire QLQ-C30. PRO scores were converted into a symptom-free scale, 100 indicating a fully symptom-free score, 0 indicating total loss of freedom from symptom. Changes of PRO over time were analyzed using the linear mixed-effect model. Survival analysis computed time to > 10% PRO-deterioration. A post-hoc cardiorespiratory outcome was defined as deterioration in any of dyspnea, fatigue, physical functioning, or pain. Results At 10.4 years median follow-up, patients returned on average 9 questionnaires/patient, providing a total of 1139 PRO records. Item completeness was 96.6%. Missingness did not differ between the randomization arms. The PRO at baseline were below the nominal 100% symptom-free score, notably the mean fatigue-free score was 64.8% vs. 69.6%, pain-free was 75.4% vs. 75.3%, and dyspnea-free was 84.8% vs. 88.5%, in the TT vs. CR arm, respectively, although the differences were not significant. By mixed-effect modeling on early ≤2 years assessment, all three scores deteriorated, significantly for fatigue, P ≤ 0.01, without effect of randomization arm. By modeling on late assessment beyond 2 years, TT versus CR was not significantly associated with changes of fatigue-free or pain-free scores but was associated with a significant 8.9% improvement of freedom from dyspnea, P = 0.035. By survival analysis of the time to PRO deterioration, TT improved 10-year survival free of cardiorespiratory deterioration from 66.9% with CR to 84.5% with TT, P = 0.029. Conclusion Modern radiation therapy can significantly improve long-term PRO. Trial registration Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.govNCT00459628, April 12, 2007 prospectively. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08916-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Van Parijs
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. .,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Martinique, Fort-de-France, France.
| | - Christel Fontaine
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Guy Storme
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Dung M Nguyen
- School of Medicine, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nele Adriaenssens
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Olena Gorobets
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Martinique, Fort-de-France, France.,Ukrainian Military Medical Academy, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - Mark De Ridder
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 101 Laarbeeklaan, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Riese R, Luke J, Lewis K, Janku F, Piha-Paul S, Verschraegen C, Brennan A, Armstrong M, Varterasian M, Sokolovska A, Strauss J. 500 SYNB1891, a bacterium engineered to produce a STING agonist, demonstrates target engagement in humans following intratumoral injection. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundSYNB1891 is a live, modified strain of probiotic E. coli Nissle engineered to produce cyclic dinucleotides under hypoxia leading to stimulator of interferon genes (STING)-activation in phagocytic antigen-presenting cells in tumors and activating complementary innate immune pathways.MethodsThis first-in-human study (NCT04167137) enrolled patients with refractory advanced solid tumors to receive intratumoral (IT) injections of SYNB1891 monotherapy or in combination atezolizumab. Patients enrolled in the monotherapy arms received doses of 1x106 - 3x108 live cells on Days 1, 8 and 15 of the first 21-day cycle and then on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle. Patients enrolled in the 2 combination cohorts received doses of 1x107 - 3x107 live cells in combination with atezolizumab administered on a 21-day cycle. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate safety and tolerability of SYNB1891 alone and in combination with atezolizumab. Other objectives include SYNB1891 kinetics in blood and injected tumor, STING-target engagement as assessed by IT gene expression and serum cytokines, and tumor responses.ResultsThis interim analysis includes 23 patients across 6 monotherapy cohorts dosed at 1x106, 3x106, 1x107, or 3x107, 1x108 and 3x108 live cells, and 7 patients dosed in 2 combination therapy cohorts (1x107 and 3x107 live cells). The mean (range) age was 61 (25–82); 19 patients were female. There were 4 cytokine release syndrome events in monotherapy cohorts, including one grade 3 event which met the criterion for dose limiting toxicity at 3x108 live cells; there were no other SYNB1891-related serious adverse events. There were no SYNB1891-related infections. SYNB1891 was not detected in the blood at 6 or 24 hours after the first dose or intratumorally 7 days following the first dose. Treatment with SYNB1891 demonstrated activation of the STING pathway and target engagement as assessed by upregulation of interferon-stimulated genes (ISG15, IFIT1, IFIt2), chemokines/cytokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, TNFRS18, TNFSF10) and T-cell response genes (GZMA, CD4, PD-L2) in core biopsies obtained pre-dose and 7 days following the third weekly dose. In addition, there was a dose-response increase in serum cytokines. Durable, stable disease was observed in two patients treated with SYNB1891 monotherapy refractory to prior PD-1/L1 antibodies with vulvar melanoma (1x106 live cells; RECIST -28%) and small cell lung cancer (1x107 live cells; RECIST -12%).ConclusionsRepeat IT injection of SYNB1891 as monotherapy and in combination atezolizumab in this ongoing study is safe and well-tolerated up to at least 1x108 live cells, and shows evidence of STING pathway target engagement.AcknowledgementsWe thank Inessa Vulfova for her clinical support in conduct of this study.Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04167137)Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol, the informed consent form (ICF), and printed subject information materials were reviewed and approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at the investigational site before any study procedures were performed. Written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from each subject before any study-specific procedures were performed.The Ohio State University Cancer Institutional Review Board; Approval ID: 2020C0194MD Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Review Board; Approval ID: 2019–0576Mary Crawley Medical Research Center Institutional Review Board; Approval ID: 19–31 SYNB1891-CP-001North Texas Institutional Review Board; Approval ID: 2019.040WIRB Approval ID: 20192779University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board Approval ID: STUDY20010116
Collapse
|
18
|
Luke J, Migden M, Chai-Ho W, Bolotin D, Wise-Draper T, Poklepovic A, Laux D, Kheterpal M, Verschraegen C, Collichio F, Lutzky J, Daniels G, Tsai K, Navia S, Castro H, Bommareddy P, Pirzkall A, Coffin R. 550 ARTACUS: An open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study of RP1 in solid organ transplant recipients with advanced cutaneous malignancies. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundSolid organ transplantation (SOT) has emerged as an important lifesaving procedure for patients with a wide range of end-organ diseases characterized by dysfunction or specific organ function failure. SOT rejection is a major complication requiring patients (pts) to undergo lifelong immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection.1Skin cancers (SCs) including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) are common post transplant malignancies.2 SC in SOT pts is generally managed with surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in SOT recipients has improved outcomes but are associated with the high risk of allograft rejection.3–5 Thus, there is a high unmet need for a safe and effective treatment that also protects pts from allograft rejection. RP1 is an oncolytic virus (HSV-1) that expresses a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP R-) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). In preclinical studies, RP1 induced immunogenic tumor cell death and provided potent systemic anti-tumor activity6 and clinical data in combination with nivolumab has demonstrated a high rate of deep and durable response in patients with advanced SCs.7 The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of single agent RP1 in kidney and liver transplant recipients with SCs, with focus on CSCC. After determining the safety and tolerability in the initial cohort with kidney and liver transplants the study may also enroll heart and lung transplant recipients.MethodsThis study will enroll up to 65 evaluable allograft transplantation pts with locally advanced or metastatic SCs. Key inclusion criteria are pts with confirmed recurrent, locally advanced or metastatic CSCC and up to 10 pts with non-CSCC SC, stable allograft function and ECOG performance status of ≤1. Pts with prior systemic anti-cancer treatment are allowed. Key exclusion criteria are prior treatment with an oncolytic therapy, active herpetic infections or prior complications of HSV-1 infection and a history of organ graft rejection within 12 months. Pts will receive an initial dose of 1 x 10^6 plaque-forming units (PFU) of RP1. Two weeks later they will receive 1 x 10^7 PFU of RP1 and continue every two weeks until pre-specified study endpoints are met. RP1 will be administered by intra-tumoral injection including through imaging guidance as clinically appropriate. The primary objective of the trial is to assess efficacy determined by ORR and safety of single agent RP1. Additional secondary endpoints include DOR, CR, DCR, PFS and OS.Trial RegistrationNCT04349436ReferencesFrohn C, Fricke L, Puchta JC, Kirchner H. The effect of HLA-C matching on acute renal transplant rejection. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16(2):355–60.Madeleine MM, Patel NS, Plasmeijer EI, Engels EA, Bouwes Bavinck JN, Toland AE, Green AC; the Keratinocyte Carcinoma Consortium (KeraCon) Immunosuppression Working Group. Epidemiology of keratinocyte carcinomas after organ transplantation. Br J Dermatol 2017;177(5):1208–1216.Spain L, Higgins R, Gopalakrishnan K, Turajlic S, Gore M, Larkin J. Acute renal allograft rejection after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic melanoma. Ann Oncol 2016;27(6):1135–1137.Herz S, Höfer T, Papapanagiotou M, Leyh JC, Meyenburg S, Schadendorf D, Ugurel S, Roesch A, Livingstone E, Schilling B, Franklin C. Checkpoint inhibitors in chronic kidney failure and an organ transplant recipient. Eur J Cancer 2016;67:66-72.Kittai AS, Oldham H, Cetnar J, Taylor M. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in organ transplant ptss. J Immunother 2017;40(7):277–281.Thomas S, Kuncheria L, Roulstone V, Kyula JN, Mansfield D, Bommareddy PK, Smith H, Kaufman HL, Harrington KJ, Coffin RS. Development of a new fusion-enhanced oncolytic immunotherapy platform based on herpes simplex virus type 1. J Immunother Cancer 2019 10;7(1):214.Middleton M, Aroldi F, Sacco J, Milhem M, Curti B, Vanderwalde A, Baum S, Samson A, Pavlick A, Chesney J, Niu J, Rhodes T, Bowles T, Conry R, Olsson-Brown A, Earl-Laux D, Kaufman H, Bommareddy P, Deterding A, Samakoglu S, Coffin R, Harrington K. 422 An open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 clinical trial of RP1, an enhanced potency oncolytic HSV, combined with nivolumab: updated results from the skin cancer cohorts. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8(3): doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-SITC2020.0422Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by institutional review board or the local ethics committee at each participating site. Informed consent was obtained from patients before participating in the trial.
Collapse
|
19
|
Tsimberidou AM, Shaw JV, Juric D, Verschraegen C, Weise AM, Sarantopoulos J, Lopes G, Nemunaitis J, Mita M, Park H, Ellers-Lenz B, Tian H, Xiong W, Kaleta R, Kurzrock R. Phase 1 study of M2698, a p70S6K/AKT dual inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. J Hematol Oncol 2021; 14:127. [PMID: 34407844 PMCID: PMC8371902 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-021-01132-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PI3K/AKT/mTOR (PAM) pathway is a key regulator of tumor therapy resistance. We investigated M2698, an oral p70S6K/AKT dual inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer who failed standard therapies. METHODS M2698 was administered as monotherapy (escalation, 15-380 mg daily; food effect cohort, 240-320 mg daily) and combined with trastuzumab or tamoxifen. RESULTS Overall, 101 patients were treated (M2698, n = 62; M2698/trastuzumab, n = 13; M2698/tamoxifen, n = 26). Patients were predominantly aged < 65 years, were female, had performance status 1 and were heavily pretreated. There was a dose- and concentration-dependent inhibition of pS6 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor tissue. M2698 was well tolerated; the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal, abnormal dreams and fatigue (serious, attributed to M2698: monotherapy, 8.1%; M2698/trastuzumab, 7.7%; M2698/tamoxifen, 11.5% of patients). The recommended phase 2 doses of M2698 were 240 mg QD (monotherapy), 160 mg QD (M2698/trastuzumab) and 160 mg QD/240 mg intermittent regimen (M2698/tamoxifen). In the monotherapy cohort, 27.4% of patients had stable disease at 12 weeks; no objective response was noted. The median progression-free survival (PFS) durations in patients with PAM pathway alterations with and without confounding markers (KRAS, EGFR, AKT2) were 1.4 months and 2.8 months, respectively. Two patients with breast cancer (M2698/trastuzumab, n = 1; M2698/tamoxifen, n = 1) had partial response; their PFS durations were 31 months and 2.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS M2698 was well tolerated. Combined with trastuzumab or tamoxifen, M2698 demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to multiple standard therapies, suggesting that it could overcome treatment resistance. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01971515. Registered October 23, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 455, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Jamie V Shaw
- EMD Serono Research and Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA
| | - Dejan Juric
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - John Sarantopoulos
- Institute for Drug Development, Mays Cancer Center at University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Monica Mita
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Hui Tian
- EMD Serono Research and Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA
| | - Wenyuan Xiong
- Merck Institute of Pharmacometrics, Merck Serono SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Remigiusz Kaleta
- EMD Serono Research and Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhang Y, Asad S, Weber Z, Tallman D, Nock W, Wyse M, Bey JF, Dean KL, Adams EJ, Stockard S, Singh J, Winer EP, Lin NU, Jiang YZ, Ma D, Wang P, Shi L, Huang W, Shao ZM, Cherian M, Lustberg MB, Ramaswamy B, Sardesai S, VanDeusen J, Williams N, Wesolowski R, Obeng-Gyasi S, Sizemore GM, Sizemore ST, Verschraegen C, Stover DG. Genomic features of rapid versus late relapse in triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:568. [PMID: 34006255 PMCID: PMC8130400 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08320-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease and we have previously shown that rapid relapse of TNBC is associated with distinct sociodemographic features. We hypothesized that rapid versus late relapse in TNBC is also defined by distinct clinical and genomic features of primary tumors. Methods Using three publicly-available datasets, we identified 453 patients diagnosed with primary TNBC with adequate follow-up to be characterized as ‘rapid relapse’ (rrTNBC; distant relapse or death ≤2 years of diagnosis), ‘late relapse’ (lrTNBC; > 2 years) or ‘no relapse’ (nrTNBC: > 5 years no relapse/death). We explored basic clinical and primary tumor multi-omic data, including whole transcriptome (n = 453), and whole genome copy number and mutation data for 171 cancer-related genes (n = 317). Association of rapid relapse with clinical and genomic features were assessed using Pearson chi-squared tests, t-tests, ANOVA, and Fisher exact tests. We evaluated logistic regression models of clinical features with subtype versus two models that integrated significant genomic features. Results Relative to nrTNBC, both rrTNBC and lrTNBC had significantly lower immune signatures and immune signatures were highly correlated to anti-tumor CD8 T-cell, M1 macrophage, and gamma-delta T-cell CIBERSORT inferred immune subsets. Intriguingly, lrTNBCs were enriched for luminal signatures. There was no difference in tumor mutation burden or percent genome altered across groups. Logistic regression mModels that incorporate genomic features significantly outperformed standard clinical/subtype models in training (n = 63 patients), testing (n = 63) and independent validation (n = 34) cohorts, although performance of all models were overall modest. Conclusions We identify clinical and genomic features associated with rapid relapse TNBC for further study of this aggressive TNBC subset. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08320-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiqing Zhang
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Sarah Asad
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Zachary Weber
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - David Tallman
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - William Nock
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Meghan Wyse
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, 1145 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Jerome F Bey
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Kristin L Dean
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Adams
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Sinclair Stockard
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Jasneet Singh
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Yi-Zhou Jiang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, P.R. China
| | - Ding Ma
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, P.R. China
| | - Peng Wang
- Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 320 Yueyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, P.R. China
| | - Leming Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai, 200438, P.R. China
| | - Wei Huang
- Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (CHGC) and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), 250 Bibo Road, Shanghai, 201203, P.R. China
| | - Zhi-Ming Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai, 200032, P.R. China
| | - Mathew Cherian
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, 1145 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Maryam B Lustberg
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, 1145 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, 1145 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Sagar Sardesai
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, 1145 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Jeffrey VanDeusen
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, 1145 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Nicole Williams
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, 1145 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Robert Wesolowski
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, 1145 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, 1145 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA
| | - Gina M Sizemore
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Steven T Sizemore
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Daniel G Stover
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. .,Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. .,Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. .,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, 1145 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA. .,Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 512, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yu KD, Liu XY, Chen L, Mo M, Wu J, Liu GY, Di GH, Verschraegen C, Stover DG, Zhuang ZG, Bertucci F, Orlandi A, Wang J, Lippi G, Wu KJ, Osman MA, Fan L, Shao ZM. Anthracycline-free or short-term regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: A phase III randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2021; 11:100158. [PMID: 34327363 PMCID: PMC8315472 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background De-escalating anthracycline is gaining popularity for breast cancer patients. We aim to evaluate the non-inferiority of an anthracycline-free or short-term regimen to the standard anthracycline-based regimen for operable patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. Methods It is a prospective, open-label, phase 3, randomized non-inferiority trial from June 1, 2010 to June 1, 2017. Follow-up had been kept until July 2019. This trial was conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Patients with pT1-3N+ or pT2-3N0 but high-risk (grade II/III, lymphovascular invasion, ≤35 years of age or hormone-receptor negative) HER2-negative operable breast cancer were eligible and stratified by age, pathological tumour stage, pathological node status and hormone-receptor status. Patients were randomized to 6 cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC, n = 524), 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide/epirubicin/fluorouracil followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel (CEF-T, n = 523) or epirubicin and cyclophosphamide for 4 cycles followed by paclitaxel for 12 weeks (EC-P, n = 524) as the intention-to-treat population. Of these patients, 94% completed allocated therapy. Difference in disease-free survival (DFS) compared to EC-P. The prespecified non-inferiority margin was 4.5%, corresponding to the hazard ratio (HR) of 1.44 (one-sided α = 0.05), with an assumed 5-year DFS of 89% for EC-P. Findings Included in the intention-to-treat population were 1571 patients (median [IQR] age, 50 [45-57] years; 92% estrogen receptor [ER]-positive; 59% pN+). Through a median follow-up of 5.5 years, HR for TC versus EC-P was 1.05 (5-year DFS: 85.0% vs. 85.9%; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-1.39, non-inferior P = 0.048) and for CEF-T versus EC-P, 0.99 (5-year DFS: 85.1% vs. 85.9%; 90% CI: 0.75-1.30, non-inferior P = 0.045). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events for TC included rash (3.9%) and peripheral neuropathy (2.8%) and for CEF-T and EC-P diarrhea and nausea/vomiting were predominant. Results of per-protocol analyses were similar. Interpretation Both TC and CEF-T are non-inferior adjuvant regimen to EC-P mainly in patients with ER+HER2- breast cancer. TC is a safe regimen that avoids anthracycline-related side effects. Funding This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 81672600, 81722032, 82072916, and 91959207), the 2018 Shanghai Youth Excellent Academic Leader, the Fudan ZHUOSHI Project, the Municipal Project for Developing Emerging and Frontier Technology in Shanghai Hospitals (grant SHDC12010116), the Cooperation Project of Conquering Major Diseases in the Shanghai Municipality Health System (grant 2013ZYJB0302), the Innovation Team of the Ministry of Education (grant IRT1223), and the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer (grant 12DZ2260100) and the National Cancer Institute (grant P30 CA16058).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke-Da Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Shanghai, China
- Corresponding Authors.
| | - Xi-Yu Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Li Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Miao Mo
- Department of Cancer Prevention & Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiong Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Guang-Yu Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Gen-Hong Di
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Daniel G. Stover
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Zhi-Gang Zhuang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - François Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13273 Marseille, France
| | - Armando Orlandi
- Comprehensive Cancer Center-Unit of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, The International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital of China Welfare Institute, Shanghai, China
| | - Giuseppe Lippi
- Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale LA Scuro, Verona 37100, Italy
| | - Ke-Jin Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Lei Fan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Corresponding Authors.
| | - Zhi-Ming Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Shanghai, China
- Corresponding Authors.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Li M, Spaccarelli N, Kendra K, Wu RC, Verschraegen C. Refractory dermatitis contributed by pityriasis versicolor: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2021; 15:212. [PMID: 33888150 PMCID: PMC8063482 DOI: 10.1186/s13256-021-02818-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dermatologic toxicity is a very common immune-related adverse event (irAE) for patients with melanoma who are receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI). Concurrent skin infection, such as in the case of pityriasis versicolor reported here, can mimic and/or exacerbate dermatologic toxicity from irAE. Case presentation A 58-year-old Caucasian man with a history of pityriasis versicolor infection and metastatic melanoma received ICI therapy. He developed progressively worsening pruritic maculopapular lesions 22 weeks into his treatment that ultimately covered 40% of his body. He was diagnosed with dermatologic toxicity due to ICI therapy with concurrent pityriasis versicolor. He was initially started on topical steroid and topical antifungal cream but achieved minimum improvement. His treatment was then escalated to oral prednisone, but it only achieved modest control of his dermatitis. All subsequent attempts to wean him from oral prednisone resulted in worsening of his dermatitis. Eventually he was started on oral fluconazole in combination with prednisone, which led to rapid resolution of his dermatitis. Conclusion We report a case of dermatological toxicity due to an irAE with concurrent pityriasis versicolor. The steroid treatment for irAE was likely exacerbating the underlying fungal infection, and the fungal infection was in term mimicking the symptoms of irAE. This patient’s severe dermatitis was only brought under control after receiving a more potent antifungal therapy in combination with a steroid. It is vital to look beyond the irAE when managing dermatitis in patients receiving ICI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingjia Li
- Division of Hospital Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Starling Loving Hall, 320 W. 10th Ave, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA.
| | - Natalie Spaccarelli
- Division of Dermatology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA
| | - Kari Kendra
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lincoln Tower 1300, 1800 Cannon Dr, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA
| | - Richard C Wu
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lincoln Tower 1300, 1800 Cannon Dr, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lincoln Tower 1300, 1800 Cannon Dr, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jin N, George TL, Otterson GA, Verschraegen C, Wen H, Carbone D, Herman J, Bertino EM, He K. Advances in epigenetic therapeutics with focus on solid tumors. Clin Epigenetics 2021; 13:83. [PMID: 33879235 PMCID: PMC8056722 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01069-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Epigenetic (“above genetics”) modifications can alter the gene expression without altering the DNA sequence. Aberrant epigenetic regulations in cancer include DNA methylation, histone methylation, histone acetylation, non-coding RNA, and mRNA methylation. Epigenetic-targeted agents have demonstrated clinical activities in hematological malignancies and therapeutic potential in solid tumors. In this review, we describe mechanisms of various epigenetic modifications, discuss the Food and Drug Administration-approved epigenetic agents, and focus on the current clinical investigations of novel epigenetic monotherapies and combination therapies in solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Jin
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Tiffany L George
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Gregory A Otterson
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Haitao Wen
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David Carbone
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - James Herman
- Department of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Erin M Bertino
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Kai He
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Owen D, Wei L, Pilcher C, Patel S, Konda B, Shah M, Ferguson S, Benner B, Norman R, Carson W, Smith M, Vogt SM, Verschraegen C, He K, Bertino E, Presley C, Shields P, Carbone D, Otterson G. P79.04 A Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab and Temozolomide in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: Interim Efficacy Analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.01.1183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
25
|
Vinh-Hung V, Natchagande G, Joachim C, Gorobets O, Drame M, Bougas S, Folefac E, Nguyen NP, Verschraegen C, Yin M. Low-Dose Enzalutamide in Late-Elderly Patients (≥ 75 Years Old) Presenting With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:e660-e668. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
26
|
Li M, Li Z, Kalinski P, Verschraegen C, Clinton S, Yang Y, Mortazavi A, Monk P, Folefac E, Yin M, Parikh A, Yang Y. 156P High TLR3 expression predicts improved survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
27
|
Jiang YZ, Liu Y, Xiao Y, Hu X, Jiang L, Zuo WJ, Ma D, Ding J, Zhu X, Zou J, Verschraegen C, Stover DG, Kaklamani V, Wang ZH, Shao ZM. Molecular subtyping and genomic profiling expand precision medicine in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: the FUTURE trial. Cell Res 2020; 31:178-186. [PMID: 32719455 PMCID: PMC8027015 DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-0375-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, and molecular subtyping may result in improved diagnostic precision and targeted therapies. Our previous study classified TNBCs into four subtypes with putative therapeutic targets. Here, we conducted the FUTURE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03805399), a phase Ib/II subtyping-based and genomic biomarker-guided umbrella trial, to evaluate the efficacy of these targets. Patients with refractory metastatic TNBC were enrolled and stratified by TNBC subtypes and genomic biomarkers, and assigned to one of these seven arms: (A) pyrotinib with capecitabine, (B) androgen receptor inhibitor with CDK4/6 inhibitor, (C) anti PD-1 with nab-paclitaxel, (D) PARP inhibitor included, (E) and (F) anti-VEGFR included, or (G) mTOR inhibitor with nab-paclitaxel. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). We enrolled 69 refractory metastatic TNBC patients with a median of three previous lines of therapy (range, 1–8). Objective response was achieved in 20 (29.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.7%–41.2%) of the 69 intention-to-treat (ITT) patients. Our results showed that immunotherapy (arm C), in particular, achieved the highest ORR (52.6%, 95% CI: 28.9%–75.6%) in the ITT population. Arm E demonstrated favorable ORR (26.1%, 95% CI: 10.2%–48.4% in the ITT population) but with more high grade (≥ 3) adverse events. Somatic mutations of TOP2A and CD8 immunohistochemical score may have the potential to predict immunotherapy response in the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC. In conclusion, the phase Ib/II FUTURE trial suggested a new concept for TNBC treatment, demonstrating the clinical benefit of subtyping-based targeted therapy for refractory metastatic TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Zhou Jiang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yin Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yi Xiao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xin Hu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Lin Jiang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wen-Jia Zuo
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Ding Ma
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jiahan Ding
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhu
- Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co Ltd, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, 222002, China
| | - Jianjun Zou
- Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co Ltd, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, 222002, China
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Daniel G Stover
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Virginia Kaklamani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78284, USA
| | - Zhong-Hua Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Zhi-Ming Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhang Y, Nock W, Wyse M, Weber Z, Adams EJ, Sarah A, Stockard S, Tallman D, Singh J, Bae J, Winer EP, Lin NU, Jiang YZ, Ma D, Wang P, Shi L, Huang W, Shao ZM, Verschraegen C, Cherian M, Lustberg MB, Ramaswamy B, Sardesai S, VanDeusen J, Williams N, Robert W, Stover DG. Abstract P4-05-02: Machine learning predicts rapid relapse in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p4-05-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Cancers with short interval between diagnosis and metastasis are associated with aggressive clinical course. Specifically, metastatic relapse of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) within 2 years of initial primary diagnosis is associated with marked chemoresistance, rapid progression, and poor prognosis. We hypothesized that rapid relapse TNBCs (rrTNBC; distant metastatic relapse or death <2 years) reflect distinct clinical and genomic features vs. late relapse (lrTNBC; >2 years) or no relapse (nrTNBC; no distant relapse or death with at least 5 years follow-up). Patients and Methods: We identified 453 primary TNBCs from three publicly-available datasets and characterized each as rrTNBC, lrTNBC, or nrTNBC. We compiled primary tumor clinical and multi-omic data, including transcriptome (n=453), copy number alterations (CNAs; n=317), and mutations in 171 cancer-related genes (n=317), then calculated expression and immune signatures. Results: Patients with rrTNBC were higher stage at diagnosis (Chi-square p<0.0001) while lrTNBC were more likely to be non-basal PAM50 subtype (Chi-square p=0.03). Among 125 expression signatures, rrTNBC and lrTNBC had significantly lower immune signatures relative to nrTNBC suggesting an immune suppressed microenvironment. lrTNBCs were enriched for eight estrogen/luminal signatures (all FDR p<0.05). There was no significant difference in tumor mutation burden or percent genome altered across the groups. Among mutations, only TP53 mutations were significantly more frequent in rrTNBC compared to lrTNBC (Fisher exact FDR p=0.009). To develop an optimal classifier, we used 77 significant clinical and ‘omic features for training (n=214 patients) using six modeling approaches encompassing simple, machine learning, and artificial neural network (ANN), then evaluated performance to predict rrTNBc vs. lrTNBC vs. nrTNBC in validation cohort (n=90 patients) and independent testing cohort (n=81 patients). Among modeling approaches, support vector machine had the highest average receiver-operator characteristic area under curve (AUC) in both validation (AUC=0.79) and independent testing (AUC=0.72) cohorts. Conclusions: We provide a new approach to define TNBCs based on timing of relapse. We identify distinct clinical and genomic features that can be incorporated into machine learning models to predict rrTNBC.
Citation Format: Yiqing Zhang, William Nock, Meghan Wyse, Zachary Weber, Elizabeth J Adams, Asad Sarah, Sinclair Stockard, David Tallman, Jasneet Singh, Junu Bae, Eric P Winer, Nancy U Lin, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Ding Ma, Peng Wang, Leming Shi, Wei Huang, Zhi-Ming Shao, Claire Verschraegen, Mathew Cherian, Maryam B Lustberg, Bhuvana Ramaswamy, Sagar Sardesai, Jeffrey VanDeusen, Nicole Williams, Wesolowski Robert, Daniel G Stover. Machine learning predicts rapid relapse in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-05-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiqing Zhang
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - William Nock
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Meghan Wyse
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Zachary Weber
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Asad Sarah
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - David Tallman
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Jasneet Singh
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Junu Bae
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Yi-Zhou Jiang
- 3Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ding Ma
- 3Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Peng Wang
- 3Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Leming Shi
- 3Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Huang
- 3Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Ming Shao
- 3Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Mathew Cherian
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Sagar Sardesai
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Nicole Williams
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Daniel G Stover
- 1Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Van Parijs H, Vinh-Hung V, Fontaine C, Storme GA, Adriaenssens N, Hanon S, Vanhoeij M, Lustberg MB, Williams N, Nguyen DM, Nguyen NP, Verschraegen C, De Ridder M. Abstract P2-13-01: Quality of life in survivors of stage I-II breast cancer, 10 years outcome of a randomized clinical trial comparing post-operative hypofractionation with Tomotherapy versus conventional radiation treatment (TomoBreast). Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p2-13-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: TomoBreast compared normofractionated conventional radiotherapy (CR) with hypofractionated tomotherapy (TT), on the hypothesis that normal-tissue sparing by tomotherapy should reduce lung-heart toxicity. Quality of life (QOL) outcomes at 8-12 years are presented herein. Materials-Methods: The trial enrolled 123 women in 2007-2011, 64 were randomized to CR, 59 to TT. CR delivered 50 Gy in 25 fractions/5 weeks to the breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, 16 Gy/8 fractions/1.6 weeks sequential-boost in patients who underwent lumpectomy. TT delivered 42 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks to the breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, concurrently with chemotherapy by institution's practice, 51 Gy simultaneous-integrated-boost in patients with lumpectomy. QOL assessments used the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23. Intent-to-treat analyses used the linear mixed-effect model (LMM), and survival analysis applied to time to >10% deterioration (TTD) in QOL-measures. A cardiorespiratory composite TTD event was defined as deterioration in any of the dyspnea, fatigue, physical functioning, or pain measures. Results: On survival and tumor control, there were no differences in overall and disease-free survival. On QOL analysis by LMM, TT in late >2 years period was associated with poorer nausea-scores (modeled deterioration 21.2%, P<0.001), better cognitive functioning (15.7%, P<0.001), better freedom from dyspnea (9.4%, P=0.027), and better freedom from financial stress (13.3%, P<0.001) (Table 1, P-values * ≤.05; ** ≤.01; *** ≤.001). By TTD, the composite outcome showed reduced risk of cardiorespiratory deterioration; the estimated 10-years risk of deterioration was 29.8% in the CR arm versus 13.8% in the TT arm, P=0.033. Conclusion: The long term result shows significantly better cardiorespiratory and other QOL scores in favor of hypofractionation with tomotherapy. Clinical trials to further enhance lung-heart outcome in breast cancer radiotherapy should be considered.
Linear mixed model by Time and Tomotherapy. Coef: %change from baselineEarly (≤2 years) assessmentLate (>2 years) assessmentTime Early effect coef/yearP- Tomotherapy Early effectP- Time Late effect coef/yearP- Tomotherapy Late effectP- Global health status11.3*-7.4*-0.6-4.7C30 summary5.8**-1.2-0.62.2Physical functioning5.30.3-0.5-1.0Role functioning25.0***-4.5-1.32.1Emotional functioning2.20.7-0.75.2Cognitive functioning3.63.1-1.5*15.7***Social functioning13.4**-2.1-1.0-8.4Fatigue free13.7**-1.6-0.62.3Appetence12.2**-0.70.52.1Nausea vomiting free9.3-12.1*-0.6-21.2***Constipation free-0.50.5-1.07.3Diarhea free3.1-3.3-0.7-3.6Pain free10.8-4.7-0.1-2.3Dyspnea free4.90.8-0.89.4*Sleep loss free3.2-2.80.3-1.4Financial stress free1.03.1-0.213.3***Good body image24.3**1.7-0.99.5Sexual functioning13.10.5-3.3-3.3Sexual enjoyment-1.6-4.31.8-2.1Future worry-free18.0**-5.6-1.0-13.3Systemic symptom free3.30.30.14.3Breast symptom free12.1**-0.50.65.2Arm symptom free-0.80.2-0.53.8Hair loss free23.40.5-0.3-20.6
Citation Format: Hilde Van Parijs, Vincent Vinh-Hung, Christel Fontaine, Guy A Storme, Nele Adriaenssens, Shane Hanon, Marian Vanhoeij, Maryam B Lustberg, Nicole Williams, Dung M Nguyen, Nam P Nguyen, Claire Verschraegen, Mark De Ridder. Quality of life in survivors of stage I-II breast cancer, 10 years outcome of a randomized clinical trial comparing post-operative hypofractionation with Tomotherapy versus conventional radiation treatment (TomoBreast) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Van Parijs
- 1Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Christel Fontaine
- 1Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Guy A Storme
- 1Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nele Adriaenssens
- 1Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shane Hanon
- 1Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marian Vanhoeij
- 1Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Nicole Williams
- 3The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Dung M Nguyen
- 4School of Medicine, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam
| | | | | | - Mark De Ridder
- 1Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yin M, Verschraegen C, Vincent VH, Patel SM, George T, Truica CI. Impact of lack of surgery on outcomes in elderly women with nonmetastatic breast cancer-A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 18 population based study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e18745. [PMID: 32011455 PMCID: PMC7220091 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Elderly women with early-stage, nonmetastatic breast cancer do not always receive recommendations for definitive surgical treatment. The reasons vary and include patient and provider-related reasons.We queried the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database from 2010 to 2013 for women age 60 and older with stage I/II/III invasive breast cancer for whom local treatment was known. We divided the patients into 3 groups: patients for whom surgery was performed; patients for whom surgery was recommended but not performed; patients for whom surgery was not recommended and not performed. We used Kaplan-Meier method to generate OS curves and the Cox proportional hazard test to compare survival outcomes.A total of 119,404 patients were eligible for study with a median age between 70 and 74 years old. Compared with patients who received breast surgery, patients who did not receive surgery had a worse overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 7.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.98-7.83, P < .001). Patients who were recommended but ultimately did not undergo surgery had better OS than those who were recommended against surgery (adjusted HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53-0.69). However, their survival was significantly inferior to patients who underwent surgery (adjusted HR, 2.81; 95% CI 2.48-3.19). Similar results were found regardless of age, tumor stage, estrogen receptor, or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and were recapitulated in analyses of cancer-specific survival.Upfront definitive breast surgery should be performed in medically-fit elderly patients with early-stage, nonmetastatic breast cancer given significant survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Yin
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Vinh-Hung Vincent
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- University Hospital of Martinique, Martinique, France
| | | | - Tiffany George
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Martinique, Bld Pasteur, Fort-de-France, Martinique.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nam P Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hassan R, Thomas A, Nemunaitis JJ, Patel MR, Bennouna J, Chen FL, Delord JP, Dowlati A, Kochuparambil ST, Taylor MH, Powderly JD, Vaishampayan UN, Verschraegen C, Grote HJ, von Heydebreck A, Chin K, Gulley JL. Efficacy and Safety of Avelumab Treatment in Patients With Advanced Unresectable Mesothelioma: Phase 1b Results From the JAVELIN Solid Tumor Trial. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5:351-357. [PMID: 30605211 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Importance Patients with malignant mesothelioma whose disease has progressed after platinum and pemetrexed treatment have limited options. Anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies have antitumor activity in this disease, but little is known about the activity of anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies in patients with mesothelioma. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of avelumab in a cohort of patients with previously treated mesothelioma. Design, Setting, and Participants Phase 1b open-label study (JAVELIN Solid Tumor) in patients with unresectable mesothelioma that progressed after platinum and pemetrexed treatment, enrolled at 25 sites in 3 countries between September 9, 2014, and July 22, 2015. Interventions Participants received avelumab, 10 mg/kg, every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal from the study. Main Outcomes and Measures Prespecified end points included confirmed best overall response based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, version 1.1; duration of response; progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); PD-L1 expression-based analyses; and safety. Results Of 53 patients treated with avelumab, the median age was 67 (range, 32-84) years; 32 (60%) were male. As of December 31, 2016, median follow-up was 24.8 (range, 16.8-27.8) months. Twenty patients (38%) had 3 or more previous lines of therapy (median, 2; range, 1-8). The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 9% (5 patients; 95% CI, 3.1%-20.7%), with complete response in 1 patient and partial response in 4 patients. Responses were durable (median, 15.2 months; 95% CI, 11.1 to not estimable months) and occurred in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (3 of 16; ORR, 19%; 95% CI, 4.0%-45.6%) and PD-L1-negative tumors (2 of 27; ORR, 7%; 95% CI, 0.9%-24.3%) based on a 5% or greater PD-L1 cutoff. Disease control rate was 58% (31 patients). Median PFS was 4.1 (95% CI, 1.4-6.2) months, and the 12-month PFS rate was 17.4% (95% CI, 7.7%-30.4%). Median OS was 10.7 (95% CI, 6.4-20.2) months, and the median 12-month OS rate was 43.8% (95% CI, 29.8%-57.0%). Five patients (9%) had a grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event, and 3 (6%) had a grade 3 or 4 immune-related, treatment-related adverse event. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions and Relevance Avelumab showed durable antitumor activity and disease control with an acceptable safety profile in a heavily pretreated cohort of patients with mesothelioma. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01772004.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffit Hassan
- Thoracic and GI Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Anish Thomas
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - John J Nemunaitis
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Manish R Patel
- Florida Cancer Specialists/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Sarasota
| | - Jaafar Bennouna
- Department of Pneumology, Thoracic Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Franklin L Chen
- Novant Health Oncology Specialists, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - Afshin Dowlati
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Matthew H Taylor
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - John D Powderly
- Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, North Carolina
| | | | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
| | | | | | | | - James L Gulley
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.,Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vinh-Hung V, Leduc N, Baudin J, Storme G, Nguyen NP, Joachim C, Cecilia-Joseph E, Verschraegen C. Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer: A Random Walk Model of Tumor Burden. Cureus 2019; 11:e6249. [PMID: 31890445 PMCID: PMC6935340 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
We reinvestigate the relationship between axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer and the overall risk of death. Patients were women from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, aged between 50 and 65 years, presenting a first primary T1-T2 (tumor size ≤5 cm), node-positive, non-metastasized unilateral breast carcinoma, diagnosed from 1988 to 1997, treated with mastectomy without radiotherapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) were computed at each percentage of involved nodes using the proportional hazards model, adjusting for the patient's demographic and tumor characteristics. The pattern of the hazard ratios was examined using serial correlations. Significance testing used the "portmanteau" test. Based on 4,387 records available for analysis, the relation between adjusted mortality and axillary lymph node involvement was modeled as Ht - Ht- 1 = μ + at, where t is the percentage of involved nodes, Ht is the mortality hazard ratio at the percentage t, μ is a constant, and at is white noise. The constant μ was estimated at 0.020, corresponding to a 2% increment in the mortality hazard ratio per 1% increase in the percentage of positive nodes. The model was considered acceptable by the "portmanteau" test (P=0.205). We conclude that the effect of the tumor burden might be expressed as a random walk difference model, relating the mortality hazard ratio with the percentage of involved nodes. We will use the model to explore how treatments affect the course of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, MTQ
| | - Nicolas Leduc
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, MTQ
| | | | - Guy Storme
- Radiation Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, BEL
| | - Nam P Nguyen
- Radiation Oncology, Howard University, Washington DC, USA
| | - Clarisse Joachim
- Epidemiology and Public Health, Cancer Registry, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France, MTQ
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vinh-Hung V, Leduc N, Verellen D, Verschraegen C, Dipasquale G, Nguyen NP. The mean absolute dose deviation-A common metric for the evaluation of dose-volume histograms in radiation therapy. Med Dosim 2019; 45:186-189. [PMID: 31757715 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy needs to balance between delivering a high dose to targets and the lowest possible dose to the organs at risk. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) summarize the distribution of radiation doses in the irradiated structures. The interpretation can however be a challenge when the number of structures is high. We propose the use of a simple summary metric. We define the mean absolute dose deviation (MADD) as the average of absolute differences between a DVH and a reference dose. The properties are evaluated through numerical analysis. Calculus trivially shows the identity of the MADD and the area between curves, between DVH and reference dose. Computation of the MADD is the same regardless of structures' designation, whether organ at risk or target, on the same dose scale. Basic calculus properties open the perspective of applying the MADD to the evaluation of treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France 97200 Martinique, France.
| | - Nicolas Leduc
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Martinique, Fort-de-France 97200 Martinique, France
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Medical Physics, Iridium Cancer Network, Wilrijk 2610, Belgium
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yin M, Zhao J, Monk P, Martin D, Folefac E, Joshi M, Jin N, Mortazavi A, Verschraegen C, Clinton S. Comparative effectiveness of surgery versus external beam radiation with/without brachytherapy in high-risk localized prostate cancer. Cancer Med 2019; 9:27-34. [PMID: 31697452 PMCID: PMC6943084 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains controversial if radical prostatectomy or definitive radiation therapy produces equivalent outcomes in high-risk localized prostate cancer. METHODS We queried The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for those who received upfront surgery or who were recommended for surgery but instead received radiation. Inverse probability of treatment weighing was used to adjust for covariate imbalance and the weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the effects of treatment groups on survival. A meta-analysis was performed to pool estimates from published studies. RESULTS Among eligible 62 533 patients, 59 540 had upfront surgery and 2993 patients had upfront radiotherapy. EBRT + BT was associated with a superior cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared with surgery or EBRT alone (HR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.3-1.0; HR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.24-0.98, respectively), whereas EBRT was associated with an inferior overall survival (OS) compared with surgery (HR, 1.46, 95% CI, 1.16-1.8). Radiotherapy (EBRT ± BT) was inferior to surgery by OS (HR, 1.63, 95% CI, 1.13-2.34) in patients ≤ 65 years, and was superior to surgery by CSS in patients > 65 years (HR, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.49-0.97). The meta-analysis showed consistent results. CONCLUSION EBRT + BT was associated with a significantly better prostate CSS compared with surgery or EBRT. EBRT alone was inferior to surgery by OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Yin
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jing Zhao
- Biomedical Statistics, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Paul Monk
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Douglas Martin
- Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Edmund Folefac
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Monika Joshi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Penn State University Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Ning Jin
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amir Mortazavi
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Steven Clinton
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hrinczenko B, Spigel D, Iannotti N, Safran H, Taylor M, Bennouna J, Goel S, Leach J, Wong D, Kelly K, Verschraegen C, Bajars M, Manitz J, Ruisi M, Gulley J. Long-term avelumab treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Post hoc analyses from JAVELIN solid tumour. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz260.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
37
|
Benner B, Duggan M, Stiff A, Konda B, Rupert RD, Monk P, Verschraegen C, Shah H, Noonan A, Carson WE, Wesolowski R. Abstract CT169: Pilot study testing the effects of BTK inhibitor ibrutinib and nivolumab on levels and function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and other immune subsets in patients with metastatic solid tumors (NCT03525925). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-ct169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are a naturally occurring population of immature myeloid cells with immune suppressive function that curtail inflammatory processes. In cancer, these cells abnormally expand and migrate to tumor/lymphoid regions where they negatively impact antigen specific and innate immune effector cells. Circulating MDSC levels have also been associated with the higher tumor burden and decreased survival of patients with solid tumors. Preclinical studies performed by our group demonstrated that ibrutinib (PCI-32765), an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, is capable of inhibiting MDSC generation and their immunosuppressive function (A. Stiff, CA Res, 2016). We also found that the combination of ibrutinib and a PD-L1 inhibitor worked synergistically in a mouse model of mammary carcinoma. Based on these results, targeting MDSC with ibrutinib has the potential to enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Materials and Methods: This pilot study will assess the effect of single agent ibrutinib and ibrutinib in combination with nivolumab on levels and function of circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells in 15 patients with advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients are required to have metastatic malignancy and be eligible for treatment with nivolumab as determined by the treating physician. Study subjects will be treated with ibrutinib at 420 mg given orally once daily. Nivolumab will be given at a standard dose of 240 mg IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 15 on 28-day cycles. Ibrutinib dosing will be started 7 (+/-2) days prior to cycle 1 of nivolumab therapy and will be given until cycle 1, day 8 of nivolumab or total of 15 days (whichever comes first). Peripheral blood will be collected just prior to initiation of ibrutinib (at day -7), prior to day 1 of cycle 1, prior to day 8 of cycle 1, prior to day 1 of cycle 2 and at the time of disease progression. The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of the ibrutinib therapy on circulating levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). The safety of the study combination, effect of ibrutinib/nivolumab on immune cell subsets and the length of progression-free survival will also be assessed.
Conclusion: The study opened to accrual on August 10, 2018 and is currently enrolling the target 15 patients. To date 9 patients are on study.
Citation Format: Brooke Benner, Megan Duggan, Andrew Stiff, Bhavana Konda, Robert D. Rupert, Paul Monk, Claire Verschraegen, Hiral Shah, Anne Noonan, William E. Carson, Robert Wesolowski. Pilot study testing the effects of BTK inhibitor ibrutinib and nivolumab on levels and function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and other immune subsets in patients with metastatic solid tumors (NCT03525925) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT169.
Collapse
|
38
|
Jiang YZ, Ma D, Suo C, Shi J, Xue M, Hu X, Xiao Y, Yu KD, Liu YR, Yu Y, Zheng Y, Li X, Zhang C, Hu P, Zhang J, Hua Q, Zhang J, Hou W, Ren L, Bao D, Li B, Yang J, Yao L, Zuo WJ, Zhao S, Gong Y, Ren YX, Zhao YX, Yang YS, Niu Z, Cao ZG, Stover DG, Verschraegen C, Kaklamani V, Daemen A, Benson JR, Takabe K, Bai F, Li DQ, Wang P, Shi L, Huang W, Shao ZM. Genomic and Transcriptomic Landscape of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Subtypes and Treatment Strategies. Cancer Cell 2019; 35:428-440.e5. [PMID: 30853353 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 452] [Impact Index Per Article: 90.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
We comprehensively analyzed clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic data of a cohort of 465 primary triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PIK3CA mutations and copy-number gains of chromosome 22q11 were more frequent in our Chinese cohort than in The Cancer Genome Atlas. We classified TNBCs into four transcriptome-based subtypes: (1) luminal androgen receptor (LAR), (2) immunomodulatory, (3) basal-like immune-suppressed, and (4) mesenchymal-like. Putative therapeutic targets or biomarkers were identified among each subtype. Importantly, the LAR subtype showed more ERBB2 somatic mutations, infrequent mutational signature 3 and frequent CDKN2A loss. The comprehensive profile of TNBCs provided here will serve as a reference to further advance the understanding and precision treatment of TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Zhou Jiang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Ding Ma
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Chen Suo
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Jinxiu Shi
- Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (CHGC) and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), 250 Bibo Road, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China
| | - Mengzhu Xue
- SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, P.R. China
| | - Xin Hu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Yi Xiao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Ke-Da Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Yi-Rong Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Ying Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Yuanting Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Xiangnan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Chenhui Zhang
- Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (CHGC) and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), 250 Bibo Road, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China
| | - Pengchen Hu
- Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (CHGC) and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), 250 Bibo Road, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (CHGC) and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), 250 Bibo Road, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China
| | - Qi Hua
- Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (CHGC) and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), 250 Bibo Road, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China
| | - Jiyang Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Wanwan Hou
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Luyao Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Ding Bao
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Bingying Li
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Jingcheng Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Ling Yao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Wen-Jia Zuo
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Shen Zhao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Yue Gong
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Yi-Xing Ren
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Ya-Xin Zhao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Yun-Song Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Zhenmin Niu
- Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (CHGC) and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), 250 Bibo Road, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China
| | - Zhi-Gang Cao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Daniel G Stover
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Virginia Kaklamani
- Division Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78284, USA
| | - Anneleen Daemen
- Department of Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - John R Benson
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Kazuaki Takabe
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Fan Bai
- Biodynamic Optical Imaging Center (BIOPIC), School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P.R. China
| | - Da-Qiang Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China
| | - Peng Wang
- Bio-med Big Data Center, CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, CAS-MPG Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 320 Yueyang Road, Shanghai 200031, P.R. China.
| | - Leming Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China.
| | - Wei Huang
- Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (CHGC) and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), 250 Bibo Road, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China.
| | - Zhi-Ming Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Precision Cancer Medicine Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jiang YZ, Ma D, Suo C, Shi J, Xue M, Stover DG, Verschraegen C, Kaklamani V, Wang P, Shi L, Huang W, Shao ZM. Abstract P3-07-07: Withdrawn. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-07-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.
Citation Format: Jiang Y-Z, Ma D, Suo C, Shi J, Xue M, Stover DG, Verschraegen C, Kaklamani V, Wang P, Shi L, Huang W, Shao Z-M. Withdrawn [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y-Z Jiang
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - D Ma
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - C Suo
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - J Shi
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - M Xue
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - DG Stover
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - C Verschraegen
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - V Kaklamani
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - P Wang
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - L Shi
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - W Huang
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| | - Z-M Shao
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center and Shanghai Industrial Technology Institute (SITI), Shanghai, China; SARI Center for Stem Cell and Nanomedicine, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus; University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Blakaj D, Custer A, Zoller W, Wolfe A, Bhatt A, Grams S, Old M, Kang S, Agrawal A, Ozer E, Wobb J, Rupert R, Mitchell D, Verschraegen C, Rocco J, Bonomi M. A Prospective Analysis of Ototoxicity in Modern Radiation Therapy Treatments for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) Patients Receiving Concomitant Chemo-Radiation (CRT) with Weekly or Tri-weekly Cisplatin (Cis). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
41
|
Owen D, Burkart J, Patel S, Wei L, Tinoco G, Liebner D, He K, Shields P, Bertino E, Presley C, Johns A, Folefac E, Olencki T, Carbone D, Verschraegen C, Otterson G, Kendra K. Immune related adverse events across cancer types: Incidence, risk factors and survival. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy300.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
42
|
Van Parijs H, Adriaenssens N, Verschraegen C, Dahbi Z, Vinh-Hung V, Storme G, De Ridder M, Nguyen NP. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for early breast cancer and regional nodal irradiation—the jury is still out. Transl Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2018.04.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
43
|
Rogers S, Shah H, Yin M, Folefac E, Lee R, Verschraegen C. NKTR-214. PEGylated engineered interleukin-2 (IL-2), CD122-biased immunostimulatory cytokine, Cancer immunotherapy. DRUG FUTURE 2018. [DOI: 10.1358/dof.2018.043.05.2781505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
44
|
Tsimberidou A, Verschraegen C, Weise A, Sarantopoulos J, Lopes G, Nemunaitis J, Victor A, Shaw J, Kaleta R, Kurzrock R. Phase I dose escalation study of M2698, a p70S6K/AKT inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx367.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
45
|
Chawla S, Van Tine B, Pollack S, Ganjoo K, Elias A, Riedel R, Attia S, Choy E, Okuno S, Agulnik M, von Mehren M, Livingston M, Keedy V, Verschraegen C, Philip T, Bohac C, Lu H, Chen M, Maki R. A phase 2 study of CMB305 and atezolizumab in NY-ESO-1+ soft tissue sarcoma: Interim analysis of immunogenicity, tumor control and survival. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx387.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
46
|
Vinh-Hung V, Everaert H, Farid K, Djassemi N, Baudin-Veronique J, Bougas S, Michailovich Y, Joachim-Contaret C, Cécilia-Joseph E, Verschraegen C, Nguyen NP. Preoperative [18]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in early stage breast cancer: Rates of distant metastases. World J Radiol 2017; 9:312-320. [PMID: 28794827 PMCID: PMC5529320 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i7.312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Revised: 05/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate rates of distant metastases (DM) detected with [18]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) in early stage invasive breast cancer. METHODS We searched the English language literature databases of PubMed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Web of Science and Google Scholar, for publications on DM detected in patients who had 18FDG-PET/CT scans as part of the staging for early stages of breast cancer (stage I and II), prior to or immediately following surgery. Reports published between 2011 and 2017 were considered. The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS Among the 18 total studies included in the analysis, the risk of DM ranged from 0% to 8.3% and 0% to 12.9% for stage I and II invasive breast cancer, respectively. Among the patients with clinical stage II, the rate of occult metastases diagnosed by 18FDG-PET/CT was 7.2% (range, 0%-19.6%) for stage IIA and 15.8% (range, 0%-40.8%) for stage IIB. In young patients (< 40-year-old), 18FDG-PET/CT demonstrated a higher prevalence of DM at the time of diagnosis for those with aggressive histology (i.e., triple-negative receptors and poorly differentiated grade). CONCLUSION Young patients with poorly differentiated tumors and stage IIB triple-negative breast cancer may benefit from 18FDG-PET/CT at initial staging to detect occult DM prior to surgery.
Collapse
|
47
|
Jerusalem G, Chen F, Spigel D, Iannotti N, Mcclay E, Redfern C, Bennouna J, Taylor M, Kaufman H, Kelly K, Chand V, Von Heydebreck A, Verschraegen C. OA03.03 JAVELIN Solid Tumor: Safety and Clinical Activity of Avelumab (Anti-PD-L1) as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
48
|
Ji Y, Schwartz J, Hartford A, Ramsey J, Phillips J, Verschraegen C. Successful Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Erlotinib Throughout Pregnancy. JAMA Oncol 2016; 1:838-40. [PMID: 26181671 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yongli Ji
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington
| | - Joanna Schwartz
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy, Albany, New York
| | - Alan Hartford
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Jon Ramsey
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington
| | - Julie Phillips
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Razakanaivo M, Nguyen NP, Thariat J, Molinie V, Vlastos AT, Verschraegen C, Vinh-Hung V. Overview of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of cervix in women over 40-year-old. World J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 5:110-117. [DOI: 10.5317/wjog.v5.i1.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2015] [Revised: 09/16/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The literature on cervical embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is reviewed here to identify management guidelines for middle-aged women diagnosed with this rare type of gynecologic cancer. Specifically, the PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases, were searched to find published case series on cervical embryonal RMS reporting on four or more patients, of whom at least one was > 40-year-old. The χ2 test was used to assess heterogeneity. Five articles published between 1986 and 2013 were identified, reporting on a total of 47 patients, of whom 22 (46.8%) were older and 25 (53.2%) younger than 40-year-old. Although the two age groups did not differ significantly by stage of disease or radiotherapy treatment, the older age group received less chemotherapy (55% vs 90%, P = 0.008) and had more hysterectomy (86% vs 43%, P = 0.009). Follow-up data was missing for 18/47 (38.3%) patients. Among the 29 patients with follow-up data, survival was shorter in the older group, with 8/12 (67%) alive and 3 with disease at a median follow-up of 2.6 years, as compared with the younger group that had 15/17 (88%) alive and none with disease at a median follow-up of 3.5 years. The longest survivals among the older women were observed in those who received radiotherapy, including one case with a resected lung metastasis. A prospective multi-institutional collaboration and better follow-up are needed to determine the optimal management of cervical embryonal RMS. Long-term survival appears feasible if management is accompanied by chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
50
|
Ji Y, Rankin C, Grunberg S, Sherrod AE, Ahmadi J, Townsend JJ, Feun LG, Fredericks RK, Russell CA, Kabbinavar FF, Stelzer KJ, Schott A, Verschraegen C. Double-Blind Phase III Randomized Trial of the Antiprogestin Agent Mifepristone in the Treatment of Unresectable Meningioma: SWOG S9005. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:4093-8. [PMID: 26527781 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.6490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Progesterone receptors are expressed in approximately 70% of meningiomas. Mifepristone is an oral antiprogestational agent reported to have modest activity in a phase II study. This multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial conducted by SWOG was planned to define the role of mifepristone in the treatment of unresectable meningioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either mifepristone or placebo for 2 years unless disease progressed. Patients who were stable or responding to protocol therapy after 2 years had the option to continue with the same blinded therapy. Serial follow-up allowed assessment of efficacy and toxicity. Time to treatment failure and overall survival were ascertained for all randomly assigned patients. On progression, patients receiving placebo could cross over and receive active drug. RESULTS Among 164 eligible patients, 80 were randomly assigned to mifepristone and 84 to placebo. Twenty-four patients (30%) were able to complete 2 years of mifepristone without disease progression, adverse effects, or other reasons for discontinuation. Twenty-eight patients (33%) in the placebo arm completed the 2-year study. There was no statistical difference between the arms in terms of failure-free or overall survival. CONCLUSION Long-term administration of mifepristone was well tolerated but had no impact on patients with unresectable meningioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongli Ji
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Cathryn Rankin
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Steven Grunberg
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Andy E Sherrod
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jamshid Ahmadi
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jeannette J Townsend
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Lynn G Feun
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ruth K Fredericks
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Christy A Russell
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Fairooz F Kabbinavar
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Keith J Stelzer
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Anne Schott
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Claire Verschraegen
- Yongli Ji, Steven Grunberg, and Claire Verschraegen, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT; Cathryn Rankin, SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA; Andy E. Sherrod, Jamshid Ahmadi, and Christy A. Russell, University of Southern California; Fairooz F. Kabbinavar, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Jeannette J. Townsend, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT; Lynn G. Feun, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Ruth K. Fredericks, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS; Keith J. Stelzer, Celilo Cancer Center, the Dalles, OR; and Anne Schott, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| |
Collapse
|