Low co-expression of PD-L1 and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases HER2 and cMET in urothelial carcinoma is associated with discordant expression between primary and metastatic sites

OBJECTIVES

Novel regimens targeting immune checkpoints and the cMET or HER2 pathways are under investigation in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) though co-expression of these molecular targets has not been defined. We sought to characterize the protein co-expression rates of PD-L1, cMET and HER2 in primary and metastatic mUC lesions and agreement rates in paired biopsies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed PD-L1, cMET and HER2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in archival mUC samples identified from an institutional database (n = 143). Correlation of expression between primary and metastatic biopsies was performed in patients with available paired biopsies (n = 79). Protein expression levels by predefined thresholds were measured, and Cohen's kappa statistics (κ) were utilized to assess the agreement in expression between paired primary and metastatic samples.

RESULTS

In primary tumors (n = 85), high expression of PD-L1, cMET, and HER2 was observed in 14.1%, 34.1%, and 12.9%, respectively. In metastatic samples (n = 143), high expression of PD-L1, cMET and HER2 was detected in 9.8%, 41.3%, and 9.8%, respectively. Expression agreement rates between paired specimens (n = 79) were PD-L1: 79.7% (κ = 0.09), cMET: 69.6% (κ = 0.35), HER2: 84.8% (κ = 0.17). High PD-L1/cMET co-expression was observed in only 5.1% (n = 4) of primary and 4.9% (n = 7) of metastatic specimens. High co-expression of PD-L1/HER2 occurred in 3.8% (n = 3) of primary samples and no metastatic samples. The overall co-expression agreement between paired samples was 55.7% (κ = 0.22) for PD-L1/cMET and 67.1% (κ = 0.06) for PD-L1/HER2, but agreement for high co-expression between paired samples was very low (2.5% for PD-L1/cMET and 0% for PD-L1/HER2).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor co-expression of high cMET or HER2 and PD-L1 is low in this cohort. Agreement of high co-expression between primary and metastatic sites is rare. Biomarker-based strategies used in selection of patients for contemporary trials testing combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with either cMET or HER2-targeted agents should account for discordant biomarker expression between primary and metastatic sites.

Prognostic value of galectin-1 and galectin-3 expression in localized urothelial bladder cancer

Background

Galectin-1 (Gal-1) and Galectin-3 (Gal-3) are carbohydrate binding proteins with a wide range of biological activity, including regulation of cellular adhesion, proliferation, and apoptosis in solid tumors. Prior small studies have reported that Gal-3 expression is associated with progression of disease in urothelial carcinoma (UC), from non-muscle invasive UC progression to muscle invasive UC. We assessed Gal-1 and Gal-3 protein expression H-score utilizing a tissue microarray (TMA) created from 301 cystectomy specimens.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry for Gal-1 and Gal-3 was performed on TMA generated from tumor blocks from chemotherapy naïve cystectomy specimens. The variable of interest, H-score, was defined as the product of the percentage of cells staining positive (0-100) and intensity score (0-3) scored by a single pathologist. Survival end points were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards methods. Clinical data including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), pathologic tumor (T) stage, tumor size, node stage, and surgical margins, were included in multivariable analysis.

Results

We found that Gal-1 and Gal-3 expression correlated with intratumoral T stage (median Gal-1 H-score was 0 across non-invasive tissue types and 200 in invasive, P<0.01 and median Gal-3 score was 270 across non-invasive tissue types and 70 in invasive, P<0.01). However, the highest intratumoral H-score per cystectomy core did not independently predict for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (Gal-1: HR =1.02, P=0.44, Gal-3: HR =1.01, P=0.65) or OS (Gal-1: HR =1.02, P=0.44, Gal-3: HR =1.01, P=0.72) in this cohort. Significant intratumoral heterogeneity was present for both Gal-1 and Gal-3, with an average difference between the highest and lowest H score was 95 for Gal-1 and 109 for Gal-3 for cystectomy specimens with more than one biopsy.

Conclusions

Gal-1 and Gal-3 H-score per bladder did not independently predict for RFS or OS. Intra-tumoral Gal-1/Gal-3 heterogeneity complicates the use of Gal-1 and Gal-3 expression as a prognostic biomarker. Future studies should consider the evaluation of serum and urinary galectins as an approach to mitigate tumor heterogeneity.

Genomic analysis of response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment in high-grade stage 1 bladder cancer patients

Background

Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy is standard treatment for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) but overall efficacy is low, and no reliable predictive biomarkers currently exist to refine patient selection. We performed genomic analysis on high-grade (HG) T1 NMIBCs to determine if response to therapy is predicted by certain mutational and/or expressional changes.

Methods

Patients with HG T1 NMIBC treated with induction BCG were stratified by response into durable and non-durable responders. Baseline tumor samples were subjected to targeted DNA sequencing and whole-exome RNAseq. Genomic variants differing significantly between response groups were analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software. Variant selection was refined to target potential biomarker candidates for responsiveness to BCG.

Results

Among 42 patients, the median follow-up was 51.7 months and 40.5% (n=17) were durable BCG responders. Deleterious mutations in the RNA sequence of JCHAIN, S100A7, CLEC2B, and ANXA10 were more common in non-durable responders. Mutations in MCL1 and MSH6 detected on targeted sequencing were more commonly found in durable responders. Of all deleterious DNA and RNA mutations identified, only MCL1 was significantly associated with longer recurrence free survival (RFS) (P=0.031).

Conclusions

Differences in the genomic profiles of HG T1 NMIBC tumors exist between those who show durable response to BCG and those who do not. Using pathway analysis, those differences imply upregulation of several interconnected inflammatory pathways among responders. Specific variants identified here, namely MCL1, are candidates for further study and, if clinically validated, may serve as useful biomarkers in the future.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression is frequently discordant between primary and metastatic urothelial carcinoma and is associated with intratumoral human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 heterogeneity

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression occurs in 5-10% of primary urothelial carcinomas (UCs) but has not reliably predicted benefit from HER2-targeted agents in the metastatic setting. HER2 testing of primary tumors may not reflect the HER2 status of distant metastases. We assessed the concordance of HER2 expression in paired primary and distant metastatic UC lesions. Specimens from 149 patients with metastatic UC underwent immunohistochemical staining for HER2, including 79 paired primary and distant metastatic tumors. HER2 status was defined using 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) was defined as HER2 3+ expression in 5-50% of tumor cells. The HER2-positive, -equivocal, and -negative rates observed were 10.6%, 24.7%, and 64.7% for primary tumors and 9.8%, 12.6%, and 77.6% for metastatic tumors, respectively. HER2 ITH occurred in 44% of HER2-positive primary tumors. Low agreement of HER2-positive status between primary and metastatic tumors was observed (к = 0.193, P = 0.079). Loss of HER2 overexpression in the metastatic lesion was observed in 55% (5 of 9 cases) of HER2-positive primary cases and was associated with the presence of HER2 ITH in the primary tumor (Fisher's exact P = 0.048). Change from negative primary to positive metastasis was seen in 2% (1 of 50) of cases. No differences in metastasis-free survival or overall survival were observed in accordance with HER2 status defined by either the primary or metastatic lesion. These findings are likely to impact patient selection for HER2 targeted therapies in UC. Confirmation and evaluation of the clinical significance of HER2 discordance is warranted, preferably in the context of a clinical trial.

Limited Stage Small Cell Bladder Cancer: Outcomes of a Contemporary Cohort

BACKGROUND: Limited stage small cell bladder cancer is curable with multi-modality therapy using external beam radiotherapy or radical cystectomy. The optimal management strategy for this rare disease is still debated, yet few case series have described patients treated after 2010. OBJECTIVE: To analyze outcomes from a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing definitive treatment. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with small cell bladder cancer after January 1, 2010 were identified from an institutional database. Clinical histories were collected by chart review. Survival outcomes were analyzed in patients who received curative-intent therapy consisting of bladder radiotherapy or cystectomy. RESULTS: Thirty patients with limited stage disease that received definitive therapy were identified. Seventeen patients received primary radiotherapy, and thirteen underwent cystectomy. Median age was 70 years. Median follow up was 39.6 months (range 7.2–95.8). The median overall survival of patients undergoing radiotherapy or cystectomy were 36.8 and 30.6 months, respectively (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.35–2.85). The median metastasis free survival for patients receiving radiotherapy was not reached, and 18.9 months in the cystectomy group (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.34–2.61). The most common sites of relapse were lymph node (n = 6) and bone (n = 5). Brain metastases were less common (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving cystectomy or radiotherapy had similar outcomes in this contemporary series, but definitive comparisons are limited by the cohort size and high censoring rate (53%). Survival in our cohort is improved compared with older reports, though outcomes remain poor, reiterating the need for better therapeutic options.

Discordance of high PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic urothelial carcinoma lesions

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting PD-(L)1 are effective in select patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). High PD-L1 expression enriches for response to ICIs; however, the predictive value of PD-L1 expression is limited, which may be due in part to dynamic expression of PD-L1 in the tumor environment. We sought to characterize PD-L1 expression in primary UC and paired metastatic lesions to gain insight into the potential discordance of tumor PD-L1 expression during the metastatic process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 using the SP-142 antibody was performed on primary tumors and matched metastatic specimens in 77 evaluable subjects with advanced UC. Immunohistochemical staining was scored for the percentage of cells positive (<5%, ≥5%) in tumor cell (TC) and immune cell (IC) compartments. Correlation of PD-L1 expression in TCs and ICs was estimated using Spearman's correlation coefficients (rho, ρ). Cohen's kappa statistics (κ) were utilized to assess the agreement in PD-L1 expression between groups.

RESULTS

High (≥5%) PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic biopsies, respectively, was observed in 6.0% and 7.7% of TCs and in 14.5% and 11.5% of ICs. IC PD-L1 expression in primary tumors was not correlated with IC PD-L1 expression in paired metastatic lesions (ρ = 0.05, P = 0.67) and there was poor agreement in high expression rates between primary and metastatic lesions in the IC compartment (κ= 0.086).

CONCLUSION

High PD-L1 IC expression is temporally and spatially discordant between primary and metastatic UC lesions. Future studies of PD-(L)1 targeted therapies in patients with metastatic UC may benefit from use of fresh biopsies of metastatic lesions to define PD-L1 expression when feasible.

Patient HLA class I genotype influences cancer response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy

CD8+ T cell-dependent killing of cancer cells requires efficient presentation of tumor antigens by human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) molecules. However, the extent to which patient-specific HLA-I genotype influences response to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 is currently unknown. We determined the HLA-I genotype of 1535 advanced cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Maximal heterozygosity at HLA-I loci ("A," "B," and "C") improved overall survival after ICB compared with patients who were homozygous for at least one HLA locus. In two independent melanoma cohorts, patients with the HLA-B44 supertype had extended survival, whereas the HLA-B62 supertype (including HLA-B*15:01) or somatic loss of heterozygosity at HLA-I was associated with poor outcome. Molecular dynamics simulations of HLA-B*15:01 revealed different elements that may impair CD8+ T cell recognition of neoantigens. Our results have important implications for predicting response to ICB and for the design of neoantigen-based therapeutic vaccines.

Profiles in courage: evolution of Florida's quality improvement and performance measurement system

As public health begins to embrace performance standards, it is important to critically examine state and local health department quality improvement and performance measurement systems. In this article, Florida's decade-long evolution of quality improvement and performance measurement as well as their integration are described. Lessons for other states are discussed along with implications for implementing performance standards for state and local health departments.