1
|
Millstein J, Budden T, Goode EL, Anglesio MS, Talhouk A, Intermaggio MP, Leong HS, Chen S, Elatre W, Gilks B, Nazeran T, Volchek M, Bentley RC, Wang C, Chiu DS, Kommoss S, Leung SCY, Senz J, Lum A, Chow V, Sudderuddin H, Mackenzie R, George J, Fereday S, Hendley J, Traficante N, Steed H, Koziak JM, Köbel M, McNeish IA, Goranova T, Ennis D, Macintyre G, Silva De Silva D, Ramón Y Cajal T, García-Donas J, Hernando Polo S, Rodriguez GC, Cushing-Haugen KL, Harris HR, Greene CS, Zelaya RA, Behrens S, Fortner RT, Sinn P, Herpel E, Lester J, Lubiński J, Oszurek O, Tołoczko A, Cybulski C, Menkiszak J, Pearce CL, Pike MC, Tseng C, Alsop J, Rhenius V, Song H, Jimenez-Linan M, Piskorz AM, Gentry-Maharaj A, Karpinskyj C, Widschwendter M, Singh N, Kennedy CJ, Sharma R, Harnett PR, Gao B, Johnatty SE, Sayer R, Boros J, Winham SJ, Keeney GL, Kaufmann SH, Larson MC, Luk H, Hernandez BY, Thompson PJ, Wilkens LR, Carney ME, Trabert B, Lissowska J, Brinton L, Sherman ME, Bodelon C, Hinsley S, Lewsley LA, Glasspool R, Banerjee SN, Stronach EA, Haluska P, Ray-Coquard I, Mahner S, Winterhoff B, Slamon D, Levine DA, Kelemen LE, Benitez J, Chang-Claude J, Gronwald J, Wu AH, Menon U, Goodman MT, Schildkraut JM, Wentzensen N, Brown R, Berchuck A, Chenevix-Trench G, deFazio A, Gayther SA, García MJ, Henderson MJ, Rossing MA, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Fasching PA, Orsulic S, Karlan BY, Konecny GE, Huntsman DG, Bowtell DD, Brenton JD, Doherty JA, Pharoah PDP, Ramus SJ. Prognostic gene expression signature for high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1240-1250. [PMID: 32473302 PMCID: PMC7484370 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Median overall survival (OS) for women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is ∼4 years, yet survival varies widely between patients. There are no well-established, gene expression signatures associated with prognosis. The aim of this study was to develop a robust prognostic signature for OS in patients with HGSOC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Expression of 513 genes, selected from a meta-analysis of 1455 tumours and other candidates, was measured using NanoString technology from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue collected from 3769 women with HGSOC from multiple studies. Elastic net regularization for survival analysis was applied to develop a prognostic model for 5-year OS, trained on 2702 tumours from 15 studies and evaluated on an independent set of 1067 tumours from six studies. RESULTS Expression levels of 276 genes were associated with OS (false discovery rate < 0.05) in covariate-adjusted single-gene analyses. The top five genes were TAP1, ZFHX4, CXCL9, FBN1 and PTGER3 (P < 0.001). The best performing prognostic signature included 101 genes enriched in pathways with treatment implications. Each gain of one standard deviation in the gene expression score conferred a greater than twofold increase in risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02-2.71; P < 0.001]. Median survival [HR (95% CI)] by gene expression score quintile was 9.5 (8.3 to -), 5.4 (4.6-7.0), 3.8 (3.3-4.6), 3.2 (2.9-3.7) and 2.3 (2.1-2.6) years. CONCLUSION The OTTA-SPOT (Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium - Stratified Prognosis of Ovarian Tumours) gene expression signature may improve risk stratification in clinical trials by identifying patients who are least likely to achieve 5-year survival. The identified novel genes associated with the outcome may also yield opportunities for the development of targeted therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Millstein
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - T Budden
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia; CRUK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - M S Anglesio
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A Talhouk
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - M P Intermaggio
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - H S Leong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Chen
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Translational Genomics, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - W Elatre
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA
| | - B Gilks
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - T Nazeran
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - M Volchek
- Anatomical Pathology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - R C Bentley
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, USA
| | - C Wang
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - D S Chiu
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - S Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - S C Y Leung
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - J Senz
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A Lum
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - V Chow
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - H Sudderuddin
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - R Mackenzie
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - J George
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, USA
| | - S Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - J Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - N Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada
| | - J M Koziak
- Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, Calgary, Canada
| | - M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, Canada
| | - I A McNeish
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - T Goranova
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Ennis
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - G Macintyre
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Silva De Silva
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - T Ramón Y Cajal
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J García-Donas
- HM Hospitales D Centro Integral Oncológico HM Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Hernando Polo
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Funcacion Alcorcon, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - G C Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Evanston, USA
| | - K L Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
| | - H R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - C S Greene
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - R A Zelaya
- Department of Genetics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA
| | - S Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E Herpel
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - O Oszurek
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - A Tołoczko
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - C Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - J Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - C L Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA; Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - M C Pike
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Tseng
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - V Rhenius
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - H Song
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - A M Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - C Karpinskyj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - N Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | - C J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Sharma
- Pathology West ICPMR Westmead, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; University of Western Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - P R Harnett
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - R Sayer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - J Boros
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - S J Winham
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - S H Kaufmann
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - M C Larson
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - H Luk
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - B Y Hernandez
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - P J Thompson
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - L R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - M E Carney
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA
| | - B Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - J Lissowska
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, M Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - L Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - M E Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, USA
| | - C Bodelon
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Hinsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - L A Lewsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - R Glasspool
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - S N Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E A Stronach
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Haluska
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Centre Leon Berard and University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - S Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - B Winterhoff
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - D Slamon
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - D A Levine
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Pearlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - L E Kelemen
- Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - J Benitez
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain; Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - J Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - A H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - U Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - M T Goodman
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - N Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - R Brown
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Berchuck
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, USA
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - A deFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - S A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - M J García
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - M J Henderson
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - M A Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - A Beeghly-Fadiel
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA
| | - P A Fasching
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - B Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - G E Konecny
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - D G Huntsman
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| | - D D Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - J D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - J A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - P D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - S J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kommoss S, McConechy MK, Kommoss F, Leung S, Bunz A, Magrill J, Britton H, Kommoss F, Grevenkamp F, Karnezis A, Yang W, Lum A, Krämer B, Taran F, Staebler A, Lax S, Brucker SY, Huntsman DG, Gilks CB, McAlpine JN, Talhouk A. Final validation of the ProMisE molecular classifier for endometrial carcinoma in a large population-based case series. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1180-1188. [PMID: 29432521 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 378] [Impact Index Per Article: 75.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We have previously developed and confirmed a pragmatic molecular classifier for endometrial cancers; ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer). Inspired by the Cancer Genome Atlas, ProMisE identifies four prognostically distinct molecular subtypes and can be applied to diagnostic specimens (biopsy/curettings) enabling earlier informed decision-making. We have strictly adhered to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines for the development of genomic biomarkers, and herein present the final validation step of a locked-down classifier before clinical application. Patients and methods We assessed a retrospective cohort of women from the Tübingen University Women's Hospital treated for endometrial carcinoma between 2003 and 2013. Primary outcomes of overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival were evaluated for clinical, pathological, and molecular features. Results Complete clinical and molecular data were evaluable from 452 women. Patient age ranged from 29 to 93 (median 65) years, and 87.8% cases were endometrioid histotype. Grade distribution included 282 (62.4%) G1, 75 (16.6%) G2, and 95 (21.0%) G3 tumors. 276 (61.1%) patients had stage IA disease, with the remaining stage IB [89 (19.7%)], stage II [26 (5.8%)], and stage III/IV [61 (13.5%)]. ProMisE molecular classification yielded 127 (28.1%) MMR-D, 42 (9.3%) POLE, 55 (12.2%) p53abn, and 228 (50.4%) p53wt. ProMisE was a prognostic marker for progression-free (P = 0.001) and disease-specific (P = 0.03) survival even after adjusting for known risk factors. Concordance between diagnostic and surgical specimens was highly favorable; accuracy 0.91, κ 0.88. Discussion We have developed, confirmed, and now validated a pragmatic molecular classification tool (ProMisE) that provides consistent categorization of tumors and identifies four distinct prognostic molecular subtypes. ProMisE can be applied to diagnostic samples and thus could be used to inform surgical procedure(s) and/or need for adjuvant therapy. Based on the IOM guidelines this classifier is now ready for clinical evaluation through prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M K McConechy
- Department of Human Genetics, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Network, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - F Kommoss
- Institute of Pathology, Im Medizin Campus Bodensee, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - S Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Center, Vancouver
| | - A Bunz
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J Magrill
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - H Britton
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - F Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg
| | - F Grevenkamp
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - W Yang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A Lum
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - B Krämer
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - F Taran
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A Staebler
- Institute of Pathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - S Lax
- Institute of Pathology, LKH Graz West, Graz, Austria
| | - S Y Brucker
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - D G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - C B Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - J N McAlpine
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
| | - A Talhouk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lac V, Verhoef L, Aguirre-Hernandez R, Nazeran TM, Tessier-Cloutier B, Praetorius T, Orr NL, Noga H, Lum A, Khattra J, Prentice LM, Co D, Köbel M, Mijatovic V, Lee AF, Pasternak J, Bleeker MC, Krämer B, Brucker SY, Kommoss F, Kommoss S, Horlings HM, Yong PJ, Huntsman DG, Anglesio MS. Iatrogenic endometriosis harbors somatic cancer-driver mutations. Hum Reprod 2019; 34:69-78. [PMID: 30428062 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does incisional endometriosis (IE) harbor somatic cancer-driver mutations? SUMMARY ANSWER We found that approximately one-quarter of IE cases harbor somatic-cancer mutations, which commonly affect components of the MAPK/RAS or PI3K-Akt-mTor signaling pathways. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Despite the classification of endometriosis as a benign gynecological disease, it shares key features with cancers such as resistance to apoptosis and stimulation of angiogenesis and is well-established as the precursor of clear cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas. Our group has recently shown that deep infiltrating endometriosis (DE), a form of endometriosis that rarely undergoes malignant transformation, harbors recurrent somatic mutations. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION In a retrospective study comparing iatrogenically induced and endogenously occurring forms of endometriosis unlikely to progress to cancer, we examined endometriosis specimens from 40 women with IE and 36 women with DE. Specimens were collected between 2004 and 2017 from five hospital sites in either Canada, Germany or the Netherlands. IE and DE cohorts were age-matched and all women presented with histologically typical endometriosis without known history of malignancy. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Archival tissue specimens containing endometriotic lesions were macrodissected and/or laser-capture microdissected to enrich endometriotic stroma and epithelium and a hypersensitive cancer hotspot sequencing panel was used to assess for presence of somatic mutations. Mutations were subsequently validated using droplet digital PCR. PTEN and ARID1A immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed as surrogates for somatic events resulting in functional loss of respective proteins. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Overall, we detected somatic cancer-driver events in 11 of 40 (27.5%) IE cases and 13 of 36 (36.1%) DE cases, including hotspot mutations in KRAS, ERBB2, PIK3CA and CTNNB1. Heterogeneous PTEN loss occurred at similar rates in IE and DE (7/40 vs 5/36, respectively), whereas ARID1A loss only occurred in a single case of DE. While rates of detectable somatic cancer-driver events between IE and DE are not statistically significant (P > 0.05), KRAS activating mutations were more prevalent in DE. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Detection of somatic cancer-driver events were limited to hotspots analyzed in our panel-based sequencing assay and loss of protein expression by IHC from archival tissue. Whole genome or exome sequencing, or epigenetic analysis may uncover additional somatic alterations. Moreover, because of the descriptive nature of this study, the functional roles of identified mutations within the context of endometriosis remain unclear and causality cannot be established. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The alterations we report may be important in driving the growth and survival of endometriosis in ectopic regions of the body. Given the frequency of mutation in surgically displaced endometrium (IE), examination of similar somatic events in eutopic endometrium, as well as clinically annotated cases of other forms of endometriosis, in particular endometriomas that are most commonly linked to malignancy, is warranted. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by a Canadian Cancer Society Impact Grant [701603, PI Huntsman], Canadian Institutes of Health Research Transitional Open Operating Grant [MOP-142273, PI Yong], the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Grant [FDN-154290, PI Huntsman], the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant [PJT-156084, PIs Yong and Anglesio], and the Janet D. Cottrelle Foundation through the BC Cancer Foundation [PI Huntsman]. D.G. Huntsman is a co-founder and shareholder of Contextual Genomics Inc., a for profit company that provides clinical reporting to assist in cancer patient treatment. R. Aguirre-Hernandez, J. Khattra and L.M. Prentice have a patent MOLECULAR QUALITY ASSURANCE METHODS FOR USE IN SEQUENCING pending and are current (or former) employees of Contextual Genomics Inc. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Lac
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Room 3-218, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rm G227, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - L Verhoef
- Department of Pathology of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Aguirre-Hernandez
- Contextual Genomics, 2389 Health Sciences Mall #204, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - T M Nazeran
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Room 3-218, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B Tessier-Cloutier
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rm G227, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - T Praetorius
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Room 3-218, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Calwerstrasse 7, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - N L Orr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Suite 930, 1125 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain & Endometriosis, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Women' Health Centre, F2-4500 Oak St, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - H Noga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Suite 930, 1125 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain & Endometriosis, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Women' Health Centre, F2-4500 Oak St, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Lum
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Room 3-218, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - J Khattra
- Contextual Genomics, 2389 Health Sciences Mall #204, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - L M Prentice
- Contextual Genomics, 2389 Health Sciences Mall #204, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D Co
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Room 3-218, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - V Mijatovic
- Academic Endometriosis Center VUmc, Department of Reproductive Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A F Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rm G227, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - J Pasternak
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Calwerstrasse 7, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - M C Bleeker
- Academic Endometriosis Center VUmc, Department of Reproductive Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Krämer
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Calwerstrasse 7, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - S Y Brucker
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Calwerstrasse 7, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - F Kommoss
- Institute of Pathology, Medizin Campus Bodensee, Roentgenstrasse 2, Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - S Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Calwerstrasse 7, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - H M Horlings
- Department of Pathology of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P J Yong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Suite 930, 1125 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain & Endometriosis, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Women' Health Centre, F2-4500 Oak St, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D G Huntsman
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Room 3-218, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rm G227, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Suite 930, 1125 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - M S Anglesio
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Room 3-218, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rm G227, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Suite 930, 1125 Howe Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lac V, Praetorius TH, Verhoef L, Aguirre-Hernandez R, Nazeran TM, Tessier-Cloutier B, Orr N, Noga H, Khattra J, Koebel M, Horlings HM, Kommoss F, Brucker SY, Pasternak J, Yong PJ, Huntsman DG, Kommoss S, Anglesio MS, Krämer B. Iatrogenic endometriosis harbors somatic cancer-driver mutations. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- V Lac
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Department of Molecular Oncology, Vancouver, Kanada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - TH Praetorius
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Department für Frauengesundheit, Tübingen, Deutschland
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - L Verhoef
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Niederlande
| | | | - TM Nazeran
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Department of Molecular Oncology, Vancouver, Kanada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - B Tessier-Cloutier
- University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, Kanada
- Vancouver General Hospital, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - N Orr
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - H Noga
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, Kanada
- British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre, BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain & Endometriosis, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - J Khattra
- Contextual Genomics, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - M Koebel
- University of Calgary, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary, Kanada
| | - HM Horlings
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Niederlande
| | - F Kommoss
- Medizin Campus Bodensee, Institut für Pathologie, Friedrichshafen, Deutschland
| | - SY Brucker
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Department für Frauengesundheit, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - J Pasternak
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Department für Frauengesundheit, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - PJ Yong
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, Kanada
- British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre, BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain & Endometriosis, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - DG Huntsman
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Department of Molecular Oncology, Vancouver, Kanada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, Kanada
- Contextual Genomics, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - S Kommoss
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Department für Frauengesundheit, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - MS Anglesio
- University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, Kanada
- University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - B Krämer
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Department für Frauengesundheit, Tübingen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Keul J, Kommoss F, Karnezis AN, Wang Y, Pasternak J, Hartkopf A, Oberlechner E, Taran A, Staebler A, Schmidt D, Gilks CB, Huntsman DG, Brucker SY, Kommoss S. Sertoli-Leydigzelltumoren (SLCT) des Ovars: Dicer1- und Foxl2-Mutationsstatus als Beitrag zur Etablierung einer neuartigen, klinisch und histopathologisch relevanten Klassifikation. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1671047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J Keul
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - F Kommoss
- Institut für Pathologie, Friedrichshafen, Deutschland
| | - AN Karnezis
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - Y Wang
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - J Pasternak
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Hartkopf
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - E Oberlechner
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Taran
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Staebler
- Institut für Pathologie, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - D Schmidt
- Institut für Pathologie, Viersen, Deutschland
| | - CB Gilks
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - DG Huntsman
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Kanada
| | - SY Brucker
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - S Kommoss
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sheffield BS, Tessier-Cloutier B, Li-Chang H, Shen Y, Pleasance E, Kasaian K, Li Y, Jones SJM, Lim HJ, Renouf DJ, Huntsman DG, Yip S, Laskin J, Marra M, Schaeffer DF. Personalized oncogenomics in the management of gastrointestinal carcinomas-early experiences from a pilot study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 23:e571-e575. [PMID: 28050146 DOI: 10.3747/co.23.3165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal carcinomas are genomically complex cancers that are lethal in the metastatic setting. Whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing allow for the simultaneous characterization of multiple oncogenic pathways. METHODS We report 3 cases of metastatic gastrointestinal carcinoma in patients enrolled in the Personalized Onco-Genomics program at the BC Cancer Agency. Real-time genomic profiling was combined with clinical expertise to diagnose a carcinoma of unknown primary, to explore treatment response to bevacizumab in a colorectal cancer, and to characterize an appendiceal adenocarcinoma. RESULTS In the first case, genomic profiling revealed an IDH1 somatic mutation, supporting the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in a malignancy of unknown origin, and further guided therapy by identifying epidermal growth factor receptor amplification. In the second case, a BRAF V600E mutation and wild-type KRAS profile justified the use of targeted therapies to treat a colonic adenocarcinoma. The third case was an appendiceal adenocarcinoma defined by a p53 inactivation; Ras/raf/mek, Akt/mtor, Wnt, and notch pathway activation; and overexpression of ret, erbb2 (her2), erbb3, met, and cell cycle regulators. SUMMARY We show that whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing can be achieved within clinically effective timelines, yielding clinically useful and actionable information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B S Sheffield
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - B Tessier-Cloutier
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - H Li-Chang
- Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Barrie, ON
| | - Y Shen
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - E Pleasance
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - K Kasaian
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - Y Li
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - S J M Jones
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - H J Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - D J Renouf
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - D G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - S Yip
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - J Laskin
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - M Marra
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC.; Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - D F Schaeffer
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zaby K, McConechy MK, Färkkilä A, Horlings HM, Talhouk A, Unkila-Kallio L, van Meurs HS, Yang W, Rozenberg N, Andersson N, Bryk S, Bützow R, Halfwerk JBG, Hooijer GKJ, van de Vijver MJ, Buist MR, Kenter GG, Brucker SY, Kraemer B, Staebler A, Bleeker MCG, Heikinheimo M, Gilks CB, Anttonen M, Huntsman DG, Kommoss S. Adulte Granulosazelltumoren: FOXL2-Mutation als Grundlage zur Bereinigung bisheriger Studienkollektive und kritischen Analyse derzeitiger Behandlungskonzepte. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
8
|
Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S, Li-Chang HH, Kwon JS, Melnyk N, Yang W, Senz J, Boyd N, Karnezis AN, Huntsman DG, Gilks CB, McAlpine JN. A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers. Br J Cancer 2015; 113:299-310. [PMID: 26172027 PMCID: PMC4506381 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 529] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2015] [Revised: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 04/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Classification of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) by morphologic features is inconsistent, and yields limited prognostic and predictive information. A new system for classification based on the molecular categories identified in The Cancer Genome Atlas is proposed. METHODS Genomic data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) support classification of endometrial carcinomas into four prognostically significant subgroups; we used the TCGA data set to develop surrogate assays that could replicate the TCGA classification, but without the need for the labor-intensive and cost-prohibitive genomic methodology. Combinations of the most relevant assays were carried forward and tested on a new independent cohort of 152 endometrial carcinoma cases, and molecular vs clinical risk group stratification was compared. RESULTS Replication of TCGA survival curves was achieved with statistical significance using multiple different molecular classification models (16 total tested). Internal validation supported carrying forward a classifier based on the following components: mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry, POLE mutational analysis and p53 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate for 'copy-number' status. The proposed molecular classifier was associated with clinical outcomes, as was stage, grade, lymph-vascular space invasion, nodal involvement and adjuvant treatment. In multivariable analysis both molecular classification and clinical risk groups were associated with outcomes, but differed greatly in composition of cases within each category, with half of POLE and mismatch repair loss subgroups residing within the clinically defined 'high-risk' group. Combining the molecular classifier with clinicopathologic features or risk groups provided the highest C-index for discrimination of outcome survival curves. CONCLUSIONS Molecular classification of ECs can be achieved using clinically applicable methods on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, and provides independent prognostic information beyond established risk factors. This pragmatic molecular classification tool has potential to be used routinely in guiding treatment for individuals with endometrial carcinoma and in stratifying cases in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Talhouk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6
| | - M K McConechy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6
| | - S Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6
| | - H H Li-Chang
- 1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6 [2] Department of Laboratory Services, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, 201 Georgian Drive, Barrie, Ontario, Canada L4M 6M2
| | - J S Kwon
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St. 6th Floor, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1M9
| | - N Melnyk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6
| | - W Yang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6
| | - J Senz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6
| | - N Boyd
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6
| | - A N Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6
| | - D G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6
| | - C B Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3Z6
| | - J N McAlpine
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St. 6th Floor, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1M9
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McConechy MK, Talhouk A, Li-Chang HH, Leung S, Huntsman DG, Gilks CB, McAlpine JN. Detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies by immunohistochemistry can effectively diagnose the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 137:306-10. [PMID: 25636458 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2014] [Accepted: 01/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A proportion of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) are associated with deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR). These tumors are characterized by high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI). Identification of MSI is important in identifying women who should be tested for Lynch syndrome and identifying a phenotype that may have specific prognostic and predictive implications. Genomic characterization of ECs has shown that MSI tumors form a distinct subgroup. The two most common methodologies for MSI assessment have not been compared in EC. METHODS Pentaplex mono and di-nucleotide PCR for MSI testing was compared to MMR IHC (presence/absence of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) in a cohort of patients with EC. Concordance, Kappa statistic, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were obtained on the cross-tabulation of results. RESULTS Comparison of both MSI and MMR status was complete for 89 cases. Overall agreement between methods (concordance) was 93.3% (95% CI[85.9%-97.5%]). A one-sided test to determine whether the accuracy is better than the "no information rate," which is taken to be the largest class percentage in the data, is significant (p<0.00001). Unweighted Kappa was 0.84, along with the sensitivity (88.5%), specificity (95.2%), PPV (88.5%), and NPV (95.2%). The balanced accuracy (i.e. the average between sensitivity and specificity) was 92%. DISCUSSION We show the equivalence of MSI testing and MMR IHC. We advocate the implementation of MMR IHC in future EC classification schemes, enabling stratification of cases for future clinical trials as well as assisting identification of Lynch syndrome, so that screening and risk reducing interventions can be undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K McConechy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
| | - A Talhouk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
| | - H H Li-Chang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
| | - S Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
| | - D G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
| | - C B Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer Agency, 509-2660 Oak Street, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
| | - J N McAlpine
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St. 6th Floor, Vancouver V5Z 1M9, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Köbel M, Madore J, Ramus SJ, Clarke BA, Pharoah PDP, Deen S, Bowtell DD, Odunsi K, Menon U, Morrison C, Lele S, Bshara W, Sucheston L, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Thiel FC, Hartmann A, Wachter DL, Anglesio MS, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Høgdall C, Kalli KR, Fridley BL, Keeney GL, Fogarty ZC, Vierkant RA, Liu S, Cho S, Nelson G, Ghatage P, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gayther SA, Benjamin E, Widschwendter M, Intermaggio MP, Rosen B, Bernardini MQ, Mackay H, Oza A, Shaw P, Jimenez-Linan M, Driver KE, Alsop J, Mack M, Koziak JM, Steed H, Ewanowich C, DeFazio A, Chenevix-Trench G, Fereday S, Gao B, Johnatty SE, George J, Galletta L, Goode EL, Kjær SK, Huntsman DG, Fasching PA, Moysich KB, Brenton JD, Kelemen LE. Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:2297-307. [PMID: 25349970 PMCID: PMC4264456 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - J Madore
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Gloucester House–level 3, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - S J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B A Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 Univeristy Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P D P Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - S Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - D D Bowtell
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - K Odunsi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - C Morrison
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - S Lele
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - W Bshara
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - L Sucheston
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - M W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - F C Thiel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - D L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - M S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
| | - E Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2370 Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - C Høgdall
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - K R Kalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - B L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Stabile 13, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Z C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - R A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S Liu
- Anatomic Pathology Research Laboratory, Calgary Laboratory Services, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - S Cho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - P Ghatage
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - S A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - E Benjamin
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London WC1E 6JJ, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - M P Intermaggio
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B Rosen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - H Mackay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - A Oza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P Shaw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - K E Driver
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - M Mack
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J M Koziak
- Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, 2210 2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - C Ewanowich
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - A DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - S Fereday
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - J George
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - L Galletta
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - AOCS Study Group
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S K Kjær
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - D G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
- Centre For Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - P A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - K B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - J D Brenton
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Köbel M, Madore J, Ramus SJ, Clarke BA, Pharoah PDP, Deen S, Bowtell DD, Odunsi K, Menon U, Morrison C, Lele S, Bshara W, Sucheston L, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Thiel FC, Hartmann A, Wachter DL, Anglesio MS, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Høgdall C, Kalli KR, Fridley BL, Keeney GL, Fogarty ZC, Vierkant RA, Liu S, Cho S, Nelson G, Ghatage P, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gayther SA, Benjamin E, Widschwendter M, Intermaggio MP, Rosen B, Bernardini MQ, Mackay H, Oza A, Shaw P, Jimenez-Linan M, Driver KE, Alsop J, Mack M, Koziak JM, Steed H, Ewanowich C, DeFazio A, Chenevix-Trench G, Fereday S, Gao B, Johnatty SE, George J, Galletta L, Goode EL, Kjær SK, Huntsman DG, Fasching PA, Moysich KB, Brenton JD, Kelemen LE. Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study. Br J Cancer 2014. [PMID: 25349970 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.567] [] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - J Madore
- 1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada [2] Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Gloucester House-level 3, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - S J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B A Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 Univeristy Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P D P Pharoah
- 1] Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK [2] Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - S Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - D D Bowtell
- 1] Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia [2] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia [3] Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - K Odunsi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - C Morrison
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - S Lele
- 1] Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA [2] Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - W Bshara
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - L Sucheston
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - M W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - F C Thiel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - D L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - M S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
| | - E Høgdall
- 1] Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark [2] Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2370 Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - C Høgdall
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - K R Kalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - B L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Stabile 13, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Z C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - R A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S Liu
- Anatomic Pathology Research Laboratory, Calgary Laboratory Services, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - S Cho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - P Ghatage
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - S A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - E Benjamin
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London WC1E 6JJ, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - M P Intermaggio
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B Rosen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - H Mackay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - A Oza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P Shaw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- 1] Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK [2] National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - K E Driver
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - M Mack
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J M Koziak
- Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, 2210 2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - C Ewanowich
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - A DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - S Fereday
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - J George
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - L Galletta
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | | | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S K Kjær
- 1] Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark [2] The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - D G Huntsman
- 1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada [2] Centre For Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - P A Fasching
- 1] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany [2] Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - K B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - J D Brenton
- 1] National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK [2] Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK [3] Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK [4] Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maaßen M, Anglesio M, Staebler A, Wallwiener D, Kommoss F, McConechy M, Karnezis A, Chang HL, Huntsman DG, Gilks CB, Brucker S, Taran FA, Kommoss S. Synchronous stage IA endometrial and ovarian carcinomas share common mutations: implications for tumour evolution and clinical staging. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2014. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1388327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
13
|
Abstract
Although stimulated by more profound issues, Galilei’s quote could be applied to today’s changing understanding of the origin of ovarian carcinoma and how that knowledge might be used to prevent cancer.[...]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Miller
- ovcare , University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anglesio MS, Wang Y, Yang W, Senz J, Wan A, Heravi-Moussavi A, Salamanca C, Maines-Bandiera S, Huntsman DG, Morin GB. Cancer-associated somatic DICER1 hotspot mutations cause defective miRNA processing and reverse-strand expression bias to predominantly mature 3p strands through loss of 5p strand cleavage. J Pathol 2013; 229:400-9. [PMID: 23132766 DOI: 10.1002/path.4135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2012] [Revised: 09/26/2012] [Accepted: 10/10/2012] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Our group recently described recurrent somatic mutations of the miRNA processing gene DICER1 in non-epithelial ovarian cancer. Mutations appeared to be clustered around each of four critical metal-binding residues in the RNase IIIB domain of DICER1. This domain is responsible for cleavage of the 3' end of the 5p miRNA strand of a pre-mRNA hairpin. To investigate the effects of these cancer-associated 'hotspot' mutations, we engineered mouse DICER1-deficient ES cells to express wild-type and an allelic series of the mutant DICER1 variants. Global miRNA and mRNA profiles from cells carrying the metal-binding site mutations were compared to each other and to wild-type DICER1. The miRNA and mRNA profiles generated through the expression of the hotspot mutations were virtually identical, and the DICER1 hotspot mutation-carrying cells were distinct from both wild-type and DICER1-deficient cells. Further, miRNA profiles showed that mutant DICER1 results in a dramatic loss in processing of mature 5p miRNA strands but were still able to create 3p strand miRNAs. Messenger RNA (mRNA) profile changes were consistent with the loss of 5p strand miRNAs and showed enriched expression for predicted targets of the lost 5p-derived miRNAs. We therefore conclude that cancer-associated somatic hotspot mutations of DICER1, affecting any one of four metal-binding residues in the RNase IIIB domain, are functionally equivalent with respect to miRNA processing and are hypomorphic alleles, yielding a global loss in processing of mature 5p strand miRNA. We further propose that this resulting 3p strand bias in mature miRNA expression likely underpins the oncogenic potential of these hotspot mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Worthley DL, Phillips KD, Wayte N, Schrader KA, Healey S, Kaurah P, Shulkes A, Grimpen F, Clouston A, Moore D, Cullen D, Ormonde D, Mounkley D, Wen X, Lindor N, Carneiro F, Huntsman DG, Chenevix-Trench G, Suthers GK. Gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS): a new autosomal dominant syndrome. Gut 2012; 61:774-9. [PMID: 21813476 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was the clinical and pathological characterisation of a new autosomal dominant gastric polyposis syndrome, gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS). METHODS Case series were examined, documenting GAPPS in three families from Australia, the USA and Canada. The affected families were identified through referral to centralised clinical genetics centres. RESULTS The report identifies the clinical and pathological features of this syndrome, including the predominant dysplastic fundic gland polyp histology, the exclusive involvement of the gastric body and fundus, the apparent inverse association with current Helicobacter pylori infection and the autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. CONCLUSIONS GAPPS is a unique gastric polyposis syndrome with a significant risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. It is characterised by the autosomal dominant transmission of fundic gland polyposis, including areas of dysplasia or intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma, restricted to the proximal stomach, and with no evidence of colorectal or duodenal polyposis or other heritable gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Worthley
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
McAlpine JN, El Hallani S, Lam SF, Kalloger SE, Luk M, Huntsman DG, MacAulay C, Gilks CB, Miller DM, Lane PM. Autofluorescence imaging can identify preinvasive or clinically occult lesions in fallopian tube epithelium: a promising step towards screening and early detection. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 120:385-92. [PMID: 21237503 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2010] [Revised: 12/07/2010] [Accepted: 12/09/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optical imaging systems are robust, portable, relatively inexpensive, and have proven utility in detecting precancerous lesions in the lung, esophagus, colon, oral cavity and cervix. We describe the use of light-induced endogenous fluorescence (autofluorescence) in identifying preinvasive and occult carcinomas in ex vivo samples of human fallopian tube (FT) epithelium. METHODS Women undergoing surgery for an i) ovarian mass, ii) a history suggestive of hereditary breast-ovarian cancer, or iii) known serous ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were approached for informed consent. Immediately following surgery, FT's were photographed in reflectance and fluorescence at high resolution. Images included: (1) white-light reflectance of luminal/epithelial surface; (2) narrow-band green reflectance (570 nm) (3) green autofluorescence (405/436 nm excitation); and (4) blue autofluorescence (405 nm excitation). Areas revealing a loss of natural tissue fluorescence or marked increase in tissue microvasculature were recorded and compared to final histopathologic diagnosis (SEE-FIM protocol). RESULTS Fifty-six cases involving one or both fallopian tubes underwent reflectance and fluorescence visualization. Nine cases were excluded, either secondary to non-ovarian primary pathology (7) or excessive trauma (2) rendering tissue interpretation impossible. Of the 47 cases remaining, there were 11 high grade serous (HGS) and 9 non-serous ovarian carcinomas undergoing primary debulking surgery, 5 serous carcinomas having received NAC, 8 benign ovarian tumors, and 14 women undergoing risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO). Methodology was feasible, efficient, and reproducible. TIC or carcinoma was identified in 7/11 HGS, 3/5 NAC, and 1/14 RRBSO. Optical images were reviewed to determine test positive or negative based on standardized criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the entire cohort (73%; 83%; 57%; 91%) and in a subgroup that excluded non-serous histology (87.5%; 92%; 78%; 96%). CONCLUSIONS Abnormal FT lesions can be identified using ex vivo optical imaging technologies. With this platform, we will move towards genomic interrogation of identified lesions, and developing in vivo screening modalities via falloposcopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J N McAlpine
- University of British Columbia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 2775 Laurel St., 6th Floor, Vancouver, Canada BC V5Z-1M9.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schrader KA, Masciari S, Boyd N, Salamanca C, Senz J, Saunders DN, Yorida E, Maines-Bandiera S, Kaurah P, Tung N, Robson ME, Ryan PD, Olopade OI, Domchek SM, Ford J, Isaacs C, Brown P, Balmana J, Razzak AR, Miron P, Coffey K, Terry MB, John EM, Andrulis IL, Knight JA, O'Malley FP, Daly M, Bender P, Moore R, Southey MC, Hopper JL, Garber JE, Huntsman DG. Germline mutations in CDH1 are infrequent in women with early-onset or familial lobular breast cancers. J Med Genet 2011; 48:64-8. [PMID: 20921021 PMCID: PMC3003879 DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2010.079814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline mutations in CDH1 are associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer; lobular breast cancer also occurs excessively in families with such condition. METHOD To determine if CDH1 is a susceptibility gene for lobular breast cancer in women without a family history of diffuse gastric cancer, germline DNA was analysed for the presence of CDH1 mutations in 318 women with lobular breast cancer who were diagnosed before the age of 45 years or had a family history of breast cancer and were not known, or known not, to be carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Cases were ascertained through breast cancer registries and high-risk cancer genetic clinics (Breast Cancer Family Registry, the kConFab and a consortium of breast cancer genetics clinics in the United States and Spain). Additionally, Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification was performed for 134 cases to detect large deletions. RESULTS No truncating mutations and no large deletions were detected. Six non-synonymous variants were found in seven families. Four (4/318 or 1.3%) are considered to be potentially pathogenic through in vitro and in silico analysis. CONCLUSION Potentially pathogenic germline CDH1 mutations in women with early-onset or familial lobular breast cancer are at most infrequent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Schrader
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bocanegra M, Bergamaschi A, Kim YH, Miller MA, Rajput AB, Kao J, Langerød A, Han W, Noh DY, Jeffrey SS, Huntsman DG, Børresen-Dale AL, Pollack JR. Focal amplification and oncogene dependency of GAB2 in breast cancer. Oncogene 2009; 29:774-9. [PMID: 19881546 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2009.364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
DNA amplifications in breast cancer are frequent on chromosome 11q, in which multiple driver oncogenes likely reside in addition to cyclin D1 (CCND1). One such candidate, the scaffolding adapter protein, GRB2-associated binding protein 2 (GAB2), functions in ErbB signaling and was recently shown to enhance mammary epithelial cell proliferation, and metastasis of ERBB2 (HER2/neu)-driven murine breast cancer. However, the amplification status and function of GAB2 in the context of amplification remain undefined. In this study, by genomic profiling of 172 breast tumors, and fluorescence in situ hybridization validation in an independent set of 210 scorable cases, we observed focal amplification spanning GAB2 (11q14.1) independent of CCND1 (11q13.2) amplification, consistent with a driver role. Further, small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of GAB2 in breast cancer lines (SUM52, SUM44PE and MDA468) with GAB2 amplification revealed a dependency on GAB2 for cell proliferation, cell-cycle progression, survival and invasion, likely mediated through altered phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. GAB2 knockdown also reduced proliferation and survival in a cell line (BT474) with ERBB2 amplification, consistent with the possibility that GAB2 can function downstream of ERBB2. Our studies implicate focal amplification of GAB2 in breast carcinogenesis, and underscore an oncogenic role of scaffolding adapter proteins, and a potential new point of therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bocanegra
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5176, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yerushalmi R, Mishaeli M, Huntsman DG, Gelmon KA. HER-2 gene amplification in circulating tumor cells (CTCs): Concordance with amplification status in primary breast cancers and metastatic lesions. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e12006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e12006 Background: Recent studies have suggested a significant incidence (10%-30%) of discordance in HER-2 expression between metastatic lesions and the primary breast cancer (BC) which can result in inappropriate treatment recommendations. Biopsies of recurrent BC can aid in determining the expression but are often painful, costly, or cause delays in therapy. We initiated a study with the objective to determine and compare the molecular characteristics of the primary tumor, CTCs and metastases to assess whether the assessment of HER-2 gene amplification status in CTCs by FISH analysis could be used to determine treatment. Methods: After consent, patients with metastatic BC were enrolled, peripheral blood was collected (5 cc-10 cc), metastases were biopsied and HER-2 expression was determined. Blood samples were used for the CTC assay. We performed the CTC enrichment assay using a combination of anti CK and anti-EpCAM. The criteria for CTCs were: positive for cytokeratins 8, 18, 19, positive for DAPI and negative for CD45. Slides were scanned for CTCs using the Ariol system. When a CTC was identified the slide was reused for HER-2 FISH staining using the PathVysion HER-2 DNA Probe Kit. Initial attempts of FISH on CTCs took 48 hours to complete; to hasten the process, the second scan for FISH was done only on selected areas and the images for CTCs and FISH analysis were fused to obtain FISH images on a specific CTCs resulting in a 1 hour process. Results: To date 58 samples were collected, 40 of which had CTCs. At present, biopsies are being assessed and compared to the primary lesion in the initial 20 cases. Conclusions: FISH analysis of CTCs is a feasible technique and may be used to assess the specific molecular characteristics of breast cancer. Whether their HER-2 status reflects the metastatic or primary tumor is still unclear but is being determined and may have useful clinical application. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
|
20
|
Masciari S, Schrader KA, Senz J, Tung N, Balmana J, Razzak AR, Miron P, Huntsman DG, Garber JE. Prevalence of CDH1 germline mutations in subjects with early onset or familial lobular breast cancer, a multicenter collaboration. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.11042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
11042 Background: Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (LBC) is part of the hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) syndrome, associated with germline mutations in the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene. CDH1 mutations can be identified in 80% of families ascertained by DGC. The risk of DGC in CDH1 mutation carriers is 67% in males, and 83% in females; the estimated risk of LBC in women is 39–50% to age 80. Management of HDGC includes prophylactic gastrectomy. In this study, we estimated the prevalence of germline CDH1mutations among women with LBC who were either diagnosed at young age or had family history of breast cancer (BC). Methods: Germline DNA was collected from 383 women with LBC or mixed, lobular/ductal, BC from breast cancer programs, familial cancer clinics, and population-based cohorts. Germline BRCA1or BRCA2mutations carriers were excluded. Eligible women had (1) LBC before age 45 or (2) LBC at any age with at least two 1st or 2nd degree relatives with BC of any type. Denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography was undertaken, followed by direct sequencing of exons displaying changes. Results: At the time of submission 310 of 383 samples have been fully sequenced. One previously characterized missense mutation and four novel non-synonymous variants (1.6%) were found. Three of these women had LBC before 45 years and no family history of BC; two had BC family history. No gastric cancers were reported in these families. Functional assays to assess the pathogenicity of the variants are in process. Conclusions: These results confirm that CDH1 is responsible for a small proportion of familial and early onset LBC. Given the difficulty of identifying CDH1 mutations from BC history alone and the importance of managing the gastric cancer risk in CDH1carriers, these findings should underscore the need to obtain an accurate abdominal cancer family history from women with LBC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Masciari
- Breast Cancer Family Registry (B-CFR) and the BCRF Breast Cancer Genetics Consortium; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - K. A. Schrader
- Breast Cancer Family Registry (B-CFR) and the BCRF Breast Cancer Genetics Consortium; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J. Senz
- Breast Cancer Family Registry (B-CFR) and the BCRF Breast Cancer Genetics Consortium; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - N. Tung
- Breast Cancer Family Registry (B-CFR) and the BCRF Breast Cancer Genetics Consortium; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J. Balmana
- Breast Cancer Family Registry (B-CFR) and the BCRF Breast Cancer Genetics Consortium; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A. R. Razzak
- Breast Cancer Family Registry (B-CFR) and the BCRF Breast Cancer Genetics Consortium; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P. Miron
- Breast Cancer Family Registry (B-CFR) and the BCRF Breast Cancer Genetics Consortium; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D. G. Huntsman
- Breast Cancer Family Registry (B-CFR) and the BCRF Breast Cancer Genetics Consortium; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J. E. Garber
- Breast Cancer Family Registry (B-CFR) and the BCRF Breast Cancer Genetics Consortium; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schrader KA, Nelson TN, De Luca A, Huntsman DG, McGillivray BC. Multiple granular cell tumors are an associated feature of LEOPARD syndrome caused by mutation inPTPN11. Clin Genet 2009; 75:185-9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01100.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
22
|
Thorat MA, Turbin D, Morimiya A, Leung S, Zhang Q, Jeng MH, Huntsman DG, Nakshatri H, Badve S. Amplified in breast cancer 1 expression in breast cancer. Histopathology 2008; 53:634-41. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03155.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
23
|
Schrader K, Masciari S, Boyd N, Senz J, Kaurah P, Terry MB, John E, Andrulis IL, Knight J, O'Malley FP, Daly M, Bender P, Southey MC, Hopper JL, Garber J, Huntsman DG. THE ASSOCIATION OF LOBULAR BREAST CANCER WITH GERMLINE MUTATIONS OF CDH1. CLIN INVEST MED 2008. [DOI: 10.25011/cim.v31i4.4826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background: CDH1 encodes the cell-cell adhesion molecule, E-cadherin, for which loss of expression facilitates the infiltrative and metastatic potential of cancers. Germline mutations in CDH1 are associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), and in this setting female carriers have been estimated to have a 39-50% risk of lobular breast cancer (LBC) by age 80 years.
Aim: To determine the frequency of CDH1 germline mutations inindividuals with early-onset LBC or those with LBC and a family history of multiple breast cancers but no gastric cancers.
Methods: Germline DNA analysis of CDH1 in women with LBC, for whom germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have been excluded, who have been (1) diagnosed before the age of 45 years or (2) diagnosed at any age and have a family history of breast cancer.
Results: Analysis of 194 LBC cases has thus far revealed two novel missense mutations predicted to affect protein function. Functional assays to assess their pathogenicity along with germline analyses of the remaining 200 cases are currently underway. Several unreported silent changes have also been identified and will be measured in a case- control sample to assess whether they are associated with LBC risk.
Conclusion: Germline CDH1 mutations may cause a small proportion of familial and early onset LBC.
Collapse
|
24
|
Jensen KC, Turbin DA, Leung S, Miller MA, Johnson K, Norris B, Hastie T, McKinney S, Nielsen TO, Huntsman DG, Gilks CB, West RB. New cutpoints to identify increased HER2 copy number: analysis of a large, population-based cohort with long-term follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 112:453-9. [PMID: 18193353 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9887-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2007] [Accepted: 12/27/2007] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HER2 gene amplification and/or protein overexpression in breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and predicts response to anti-HER2 therapy. We examine the natural history of breast cancers in relationship to increased HER2 copy numbers in a large population-based study. PATIENTS AND METHODS HER2 status was measured by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in approximately 1,400 breast cancer cases with greater than 15 years of follow-up. Protein expression was evaluated with two different commercially-available antibodies. RESULTS We looked for subgroups of breast cancer with different clinical outcomes, based on HER2 FISH amplification ratio. The current HER2 ratio cut point for classifying HER2 positive and negative cases is 2.2. However, we found an increased risk of disease-specific death associated with FISH ratios of >1.5. An 'intermediate' group of cases with HER2 ratios between 1.5 and 2.2 was found to have a significantly better outcome than the conventional 'amplified' group (HER2 ratio >2.2) but a significantly worse outcome than groups with FISH ratios less than 1.5. CONCLUSION Breast cancers with increased HER2 copy numbers (low level HER2 amplification), below the currently accepted positive threshold ratio of 2.2, showed a distinct, intermediate outcome when compared to HER2 unamplified tumors and tumors with HER2 ratios greater than 2.2. These findings suggest that a new cut point to determine HER2 positivity, at a ratio of 1.5 (well below the current recommended cut point of 2.2), should be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K C Jensen
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Crabb SJ, Bajdik CD, Speers CH, Huntsman DG, Gelmon KA. Can we identify a group of breast cancer patients with a good prognosis despite four or more positive (4+) axillary nodes using a tissue microarray (TMA)? J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.10582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10582 Background: Although breast cancer with 4+ axillary lymph nodes generally carries a poor prognosis, we hypothesized that a good prognostic subgroup of such patients would be identifiable by immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers. Methods: Patients with primary breast cancer with 4+ axillary nodes and no metastatic disease at diagnosis were identified from a large clinically annotated TMA of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archival breast cancers and analyzed for eight IHC based biomarkers: estrogen receptor, HER2, carbonic anhydrase IX, EGFR, CK 5/6, progesterone receptor, p53 and Ki67. Expression of each biomarker was scored 0 or 1 to indicate good or bad prognosis based on univariate analysis of relapse free survival (RFS). Patients were banded as having a total score of 0 (i.e. each biomarker predicted a good outcome), 1–4 or 5–8. Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analysis of RFS outcomes was performed. 10 year RFS for each band was compared to the mean of predicted outcomes based on the prognostic tool Adjuvant! ( www.adjuvantonline.com ). Results: 313 eligible patients were identified and complete data were available for 228. The subset of 228 was similar to the larger group of 313 with respect to RFS and conventional prognostic factors. 10 year RFS for the 228 patients was 39.5% (standard error, SE 3.4%). The subgroup of 37 (16%) scoring zero for all 8 biomarkers had a mean 10 year RFS of 77.6% (SE 7.0). Mean 10 year RFS for the bands scoring 1–4 (154 patients, 68%) and 5–8 (37 patients, 16%) were 34.9% (SE 4.1) and 19.0% (SE 6.9) respectively. Mean 10 year RFS predictions by Adjuvant! were 35.9% (SE 2.6), 34.5% (SE 1.2) and 34.3% (SE 2.3) respectively. In multivariate analysis with conventional prognostic factors, the banded biomarker score retained statistical significance for predicting RFS (p=0.0007) along with estrogen receptor status (p=0.03) and tumour size (p=0.01). Conclusions: This TMA biomarker panel identified a breast cancer subgroup with good prognosis despite extensive axillary node involvement. Long term outcome was markedly better than that predicted by conventional prognostic factors. If validated, treatment decisions and clinical trial stratification might be modified using this new score. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
|
26
|
Bacani JT, Soares M, Zwingerman R, di Nicola N, Senz J, Riddell R, Huntsman DG, Gallinger S. CDH1/E-cadherin germline mutations in early-onset gastric cancer. J Med Genet 2006; 43:867-72. [PMID: 16801346 PMCID: PMC2563190 DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Genetic factors, including germline mutations in E-cadherin (CDH1, MIM#192090) in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC, MIM#137215), are implicated in this disease. Family studies have reported CDH1 germline mutations in HDGC but the role of CDH1 germline mutations in the general population remains unclear. AIMS To examine the frequency of CDH1 germline mutations in a population-based series of early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC <50 years old). METHODS 211 cases of EOGC were identified in Central-East Ontario region from 1989 to 1993, with archival material and histological confirmation of non-intestinal type gastric cancer available for 81 subjects. Eligible cases were analysed for CDH1 germline mutations by single-strand conformation polymorphism, variants were sequenced, and tumours from cases with functional mutations were stained for E-cadherin (HECD-1) using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS 1155 (89%) of 1296 polymerase chain reactions amplified successfully. One new germline deletion (nt41delT) was identified in a 30-year-old patient with isolated cell gastric cancer. The overall frequency of germline CDH1 mutations was 1.3% (1/81) for EOGC and 2.8% (1/36) for early-onset isolated cell gastric cancer. CONCLUSION This is the first population-based study, in a low-incidence region, of genetic predisposition to gastric cancer. Combined with our previous report of germline hMLH1 mutations in two other subjects from this series, it is suggested that 2-3% of EOCG cases in North Americans may be owing to high-risk genetic mutations. These data should inform cancer geneticists on the utility of searching for specific genetic mutations in EOGC.
Collapse
|
27
|
O’Malley FP, Chia S, Tu D, Shepherd LE, Levine MN, Huntsman DG, Bramwell VH, Andrulis IL, Pritchard KI. Prognostic and predictive value of topoisomerase II alpha in a randomized trial comparing CMF to CEF in premenopausal women with node positive breast cancer (NCIC CTG MA.5). J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
533 Background: It has been suggested that Topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) status rather than Her-2/neu status may predict response to anthracycline chemotherapy in breast cancer. Methods: In MA.5, 710 premenopausal women with node positive breast cancer were randomized to receive adjuvant CEF (epirubicin 60 mg/m2 & 5-FU 500 mg/m2 both IV, days 1 & 8, and cyclophosphamide 75 mg/m2 p.o. days 1 through 14); vs CMF (methotrexate 40 mg/m2 & 5-FU 600 mg/m2 both IV days 1 & 8 and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 p.o. days 1 through 14), all for six 28-day cycles. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from paraffin embedded specimens from 447 (63%) of these patients. TOP2A was measured by fluorescence-in-situ hybridization (FISH), classifying tumors into 3 groups by TOP2A/CEP 17 ratios: amplified (Amp) if ratio ≥2; deleted (Del) if ratio < 0.8; normal (N) if ratio 0.8 to 2. Cox models assessed interaction between treatment and TOP2A, adjusting for age, nodal status, ER, HER-2/neu status, grade, surgery and tumor size. Results: Thirty-one patients (6.9%) had tumours with Del TOP2A; 53 (11.9%) with Amp TOP2A; and 353 (81.2%) with N TOP2A. 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 48%, 51%, and 61% for patients with Del, Amp and N TOP2A respectively (p=0.22 adjusted global test). 5-year overall survival (OS) was 55%, 61% & 75% for patients with Del, Amp, and N TOP2A (p=0.67 adjusted global test). HRs for DFS and OS by treatment and TOP2A are presented in the table . Conclusions: TOP2A status was a significant predictive factor for benefit from CEF treatment for OS. Although there was a trend for TOP2A status predicting improved DFS with CEF, the test for interaction was not significant. In adjusted analysis TOP2A did not reach significance as a prognostic factor for DFS or OS. (This study was supported by the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (CBCRA), the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) and the Canadian Cancer Society.) [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. P. O’Malley
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada; Mt. Sinai Hospital/Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S. Chia
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada; Mt. Sinai Hospital/Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D. Tu
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada; Mt. Sinai Hospital/Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L. E. Shepherd
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada; Mt. Sinai Hospital/Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M. N. Levine
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada; Mt. Sinai Hospital/Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D. G. Huntsman
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada; Mt. Sinai Hospital/Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - V. H. Bramwell
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada; Mt. Sinai Hospital/Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - I. L. Andrulis
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada; Mt. Sinai Hospital/Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - K. I. Pritchard
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada; Mt. Sinai Hospital/Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Arce C, Cortes-Padilla D, Huntsman DG, Miller MA, Dueñnas-Gonzalez A, Alvarado A, Pérez V, Gallardo-Rincón D, Lara-Medina F. Secretory carcinoma of the breast containing the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene in a male: case report and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol 2005; 3:35. [PMID: 15963235 PMCID: PMC1184104 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-3-35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2005] [Accepted: 06/17/2005] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY BACKGROUND Secretory carcinoma (SC) of the breast is a rare and indolent tumor. Although originally described in children, it is now known to occur in adults of both sexes. Recently, the tumor was associated with the ETV6-NTRK3 gene translocation. CASE PRESENTATION A 52-year-old male was diagnosed with secretory breast carcinoma and underwent a modified radical mastectomy. At 18 months the tumor recurred at the chest wall and the patient developed lung metastases. He was treated concurrently with radiation and chemotherapy without response. His tumor showed the ETV6-NTRK3 translocation as demonstrated by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). CONCLUSION SC is a rare slow-growing tumor best treated surgically. There are insufficient data to support the use of adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy. Its association with the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene gives some clues for the better understanding of this neoplasm and eventually, the development of specific therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Arce
- Division of Clinical Research, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico
| | - D Cortes-Padilla
- Division of Internal Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico
| | - DG Huntsman
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Center of the Departments of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency Vancouver Canada
| | - MA Miller
- General Hospital and University of British Columbia and the Prostate Centre at the Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - A Dueñnas-Gonzalez
- Unidad de Investigacion Biomédica en Cancer, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico e Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico
| | - A Alvarado
- Division of Internal Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico
| | - V Pérez
- Division of Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico
| | - D Gallardo-Rincón
- Division of Internal Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico
| | - F Lara-Medina
- Division of Internal Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Au NHC, Cheang M, Huntsman DG, Yorida E, Coldman A, Elliott WM, Bebb G, Flint J, English J, Gilks CB, Grimes HL. Evaluation of immunohistochemical markers in non-small cell lung cancer by unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis: a tissue microarray study of 284 cases and 18 markers. J Pathol 2004; 204:101-9. [PMID: 15307143 DOI: 10.1002/path.1612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
This study has investigated a panel of immunomarkers in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis was used to investigate the possibility of identifying different subgroups in NSCLC based on their molecular expression profile rather than morphological features. A tissue microarray consisting of 284 cases of NSCLC was constructed. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the presence of 18 biomarkers including synaptophysin, chromogranin, bombesin, NSE, GFI1, ASH-1, p53, p63, p21, p27, E2F-1, cyclin D1, Bcl-2, TTF-1, CEA, HER2/neu, cytokeratin 5/6, and pancytokeratin. Univariate analysis of all 18 markers for prognostic significance was performed. Immunohistochemical scoring data for NSCLC were analysed by unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted for the different cluster groups of lung tumours identified by this method. Analysis of the three different World Health Organization (WHO) subtypes (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma) of NSCLC individually showed that different markers were significant in different subtypes. For example, p53 and p63 were significant for squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.007 and p = 0.03, respectively), whereas cyclin D1 and HER2/neu were significant prognostic markers for adenocarcinoma (p = 0.025 and p = 0.015, respectively). These markers were not significant prognostic predictors for NSCLC as a group. Hierarchical clustering analysis of NSCLC produced four separate cluster groups, although the vast majority of cases were found in two cluster groups, one dominated by squamous cell carcinoma and the other by adenocarcinoma. The clinical outcomes of cases from the four cluster groups were not significantly different. Prognostic indicators vary between different morphological subtypes of NSCLC. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis, based on an extended immunoprofile, identifies two main cluster groups corresponding to adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma; cases of large cell carcinomas are assigned to one of these two groups based on their molecular phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N H C Au
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre of the Department of Pathology and Prostate Centre--Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lewis FR, Mellinger JD, Hayashi A, Lorelli D, Monaghan KG, Carneiro F, Huntsman DG, Jackson CE, Caldas C. Prophylactic total gastrectomy for familial gastric cancer. Surgery 2001; 130:612-7; discussion 617-9. [PMID: 11602891 DOI: 10.1067/msy.2001.117099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An autosomal dominant syndrome of diffuse gastric cancer has been reported with germline mutations in the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene and has been identified in approximately 14 families and 50 individuals worldwide. Penetrance of the gene is 70% to 80%, and the average age of onset of gastric cancer is 37 years. These characteristics have led to the consideration of prophylactic total gastrectomy in family members with CDH1 mutations. METHODS We report here the first use of prophylactic gastrectomy in 6 asymptomatic members of 2 families (2 males, 4 females; ages 22, 27, 28, 35, 39, and 40) based on family pedigree and genetic analysis. Total gastrectomy was performed via an upper midline incision, and reconstruction of the gastrointestinal tract was done via a Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy. Complete removal of all gastric mucosa was documented intraoperatively, and confirmation was made that only esophageal mucosa remained at the proximal specimen margin. RESULTS The gastric specimens appeared normal, and the results of routine pathologic examination were negative for cancer. All specimens from patients who tested positive for E-cadherin mutations were subjected to a research protocol of microscopic sectioning in which 150 to 250 tissue blocks were examined. All of these patients had microscopic foci of cancer, often at multiple sites, with overlying normal gastric mucosa. CONCLUSIONS E-cadherin gene mutations in association with familial gastric cancer is a new disease for which prophylactic surgery must be considered. The morbidity of this operation is much higher than that for other genetic diseases, but the alternative is a mortality risk of more than 80% at a young age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F R Lewis
- Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Huntsman DG, Carneiro F, Lewis FR, MacLeod PM, Hayashi A, Monaghan KG, Maung R, Seruca R, Jackson CE, Caldas C. Early gastric cancer in young, asymptomatic carriers of germ-line E-cadherin mutations. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1904-9. [PMID: 11419427 DOI: 10.1056/nejm200106213442504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 254] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germ-line truncating mutations in the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene have been found in families with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. These families are characterized by a highly penetrant susceptibility to diffuse gastric cancer with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, predominantly in young persons. We describe genetic screening, surgical management, and pathological findings in young persons with truncating mutations in CDH1 from two unrelated families with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. METHODS Mutation-specific predictive genetic testing was performed by polymerase-chain-reaction amplification, followed by restriction-enzyme digestion and DNA sequencing in Family 1 and by heteroduplex analysis in Family 2. A total gastrectomy was performed prophylactically in five carriers of mutations who were between 22 and 40 years old. In each case, the entire mucosa of the stomach was extensively sampled for microscopical analysis. RESULTS Superficial infiltrates of malignant signet-ring cells were identified in the surgical samples from all five persons who underwent gastrectomy. These early diffuse gastric cancers were multifocal in three of the five cases, and in one person infiltrates of malignant signet-ring cells were present in 65 of the 140 tissue blocks analyzed, representing in aggregate less than 2 percent of the gastric mucosa. CONCLUSIONS We recommend genetic counseling and consideration of prophylactic gastrectomy in young, asymptomatic carriers of germ-line truncating CDH1 mutations who belong to families with highly penetrant hereditary diffuse gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Huntsman
- Hereditary Cancer Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Healey CS, Dunning AM, Teare MD, Chase D, Parker L, Burn J, Chang-Claude J, Mannermaa A, Kataja V, Huntsman DG, Pharoah PD, Luben RN, Easton DF, Ponder BA. A common variant in BRCA2 is associated with both breast cancer risk and prenatal viability. Nat Genet 2000; 26:362-4. [PMID: 11062481 DOI: 10.1038/81691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Inherited mutations in the gene BRCA2 predispose carriers to early onset breast cancer, but such mutations account for fewer than 2% of all cases in East Anglia. It is likely that low penetrance alleles explain the greater part of inherited susceptibility to breast cancer; polymorphic variants in strongly predisposing genes, such as BRCA2, are candidates for this role. BRCA2 is thought to be involved in DNA double strand break-repair. Few mice in which Brca2 is truncated survive to birth; of those that do, most are male, smaller than their normal littermates and have high cancer incidence. Here we show that a common human polymorphism (N372H) in exon 10 of BRCA2 confers an increased risk of breast cancer: the HH homozygotes have a 1.31-fold (95% CI, 1.07-1.61) greater risk than the NN group. Moreover, in normal female controls of all ages there is a significant deficiency of homozygotes compared with that expected from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, whereas in males there is an excess of homozygotes: the HH group has an estimated fitness of 0.82 in females and 1.38 in males. Therefore, this variant of BRCA2 appears also to affect fetal survival in a sex-dependent manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Healey
- CRC Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Huntsman DG, Caldas C. Assignment1 of the E-cadherin gene (CDH1) to chromosome 16q22.1 by radiation hybrid mapping. Cytogenet Cell Genet 2000; 83:82-3. [PMID: 9925936 DOI: 10.1159/000015134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D G Huntsman
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge (UK)
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Huntsman DG, Chin SF, Muleris M, Batley SJ, Collins VP, Wiedemann LM, Aparicio S, Caldas C. MLL2, the second human homolog of the Drosophila trithorax gene, maps to 19q13.1 and is amplified in solid tumor cell lines. Oncogene 1999; 18:7975-84. [PMID: 10637508 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL) gene is commonly involved in translocations in infantile leukemia and is amplified in some cases of adult myeloid leukemia. A homolog of MLL denoted MLL2, which represents the second human homolog of the Drosophila trithorax gene, was characterized by assembling ESTs, the KIAA0304 cDNA clone, RT - PCR fragments and a new clone isolated from a cDNA phage library and compared to the available genomic sequence. The MLL2 gene maps to 19q13.1, a region of frequent rearrangement or amplification in solid tumors. MLL2 consists of an 8.5 - 9 kb transcript and spans 20 kb of genomic DNA. The predicted MLL2 protein possesses all of the major domains defined in MLL and the two genes have a similar genomic structure. We find that MLL2 is amplified in two of 14 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines and one of five glioblastoma cell lines and is a likely critical gene in 19q13.1 amplifications. It is also a candidate for chromosomal rearrangements involving this chromosome locus. MLL2 is one additional mammalian trithorax-group gene with involvement in human cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Huntsman
- CRC Department of Oncology and Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Wellcome Trust-MRC Building, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Caldas C, Carneiro F, Lynch HT, Yokota J, Wiesner GL, Powell SM, Lewis FR, Huntsman DG, Pharoah PD, Jankowski JA, MacLeod P, Vogelsang H, Keller G, Park KG, Richards FM, Maher ER, Gayther SA, Oliveira C, Grehan N, Wight D, Seruca R, Roviello F, Ponder BA, Jackson CE. Familial gastric cancer: overview and guidelines for management. J Med Genet 1999; 36:873-80. [PMID: 10593993 PMCID: PMC1734270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
Families with autosomal dominant inherited predisposition to gastric cancer have been described. More recently, germline E-cadherin/CDH1 mutations have been identified in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer kindred. The need to have protocols to manage and counsel these families in the clinic led a group of geneticists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and molecular biologists to convene a workshop to produce consensus statements and guidelines for familial gastric cancer. Review of the available cancer pathology from people belonging to families with documented germline E-cadherin/CDH1 mutations confirmed that the gastric cancers were all of the diffuse type. Criteria to define the different types of familial gastric cancer syndromes were agreed. Foremost among these criteria was that review of histopathology should be part of the evaluation of any family with aggregation of gastric cancer cases. Guidelines for genetic testing and counselling in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer were produced. Finally, a proposed strategy for clinical management in families with high penetrance autosomal dominant predisposition to gastric cancer was defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Caldas
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research and Strangeways Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Côté HC, Huntsman DG, Wu J, Wadsworth LD, MacGillivray RT. A new method for characterization and epitope determination of a lupus anticoagulant-associated neutralizing antiprothrombin antibody. Am J Clin Pathol 1997; 107:197-205. [PMID: 9024068 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/107.2.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
A patient had both lupus anticoagulant hypoprothrombinemia syndrome and celiac disease. The presence of a neutralizing antiprothrombin antibody in the patient's serum was demonstrated by coagulation tests, immunoadsorption, and Western blot analysis. The probable cause for the severe hypoprothrombinemia was clearance of prothrombin-antibody complexes from the circulation. Studies showed the antiprothrombin antibody binding to human prothrombin was phospholipid- and Ca(++)-independent; the antibody did not bind to human thrombin. The target epitope of the antibody was studied by Western blot analysis of mutated recombinant human prothrombin molecules. The antibody reacted with the fragment 2-A region of prothrombin, spanning the second kringle domain and the thrombin A chain within prothrombin. Based on this new method, the proposed mechanism for the neutralizing action of the antibody is impairment of prothrombin activation by the prothrombinase complex, either by steric hindrance of the hydrolysis of prothrombin by factor Xa or by interference of the interaction of prothrombin with factor Va; both reactions are required for efficient conversion of prothrombin to thrombin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H C Côté
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Sixteen cases of small-cell carcinoma of the endometrium were encountered in patients who ranged in age from 30 to 78 (mean, 57.4) years. Of the 12 patients whose presenting features are known, eight had abnormal vaginal bleeding, three had pain related to metastatic tumor, and one patient had both symptoms. On pelvic examination, adnexal masses were palpable in three patients, and vaginal involvement was evident in two; one patient had a large palpable periumbilical mass. Thirteen patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Extrauterine spread was documented intraoperatively in eight cases, including widespread intraabdominal and ovarian metastases in four cases, vaginal involvement in the two cases noted previously, paraaortic lymph node involvement in one case, and tubal involvement in one case. Three tumors were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, four were stage II, two were stage III, and six were stage IV; in one case, there was insufficient information to allow staging. On gross examination, the tumors were usually described as bulky, ill-defined, and invasive of the myometrium; four were polypoid. Microscopic examination revealed sheets, cords, and nests of small or intermediate-sized cells with scanty cytoplasm, hyperchromatic nuclei, and a high mitotic rate. Single-cell and zonal necrosis and vascular invasion were typically present. Synchronous grade 1 or grade 2 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma was present in eight cases, and complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia, in two others. In three cases, the adenocarcinoma merged almost imperceptibly with the small-cell component. None of the tumors contained argyrophil or argentaffin cells, although nine of 11 tumors were immunoreactive for neuron-specific enolase (one of these was also Leu-7 positive), and another was chromogranin positive. Of the 11 cases with follow-up information, seven patients died of disease (at least four with distant metastases) with a median survival of 12 months, and another patient was alive with distant metastases at 18 months. The remaining patients were clinically free of disease at postoperative intervals of < or = 1 year (two cases) and 4.5 years (one case). This study confirms that small-cell carcinomas of the endometrium are a histologically distinctive subtype of endometrial carcinoma, which, like their counterparts in the uterine cervix, are aggressive tumors with a propensity for systemic spread and a poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, B.C., Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|