1
|
Vergote I, González-Martín A, Ray-Coquard I, Harter P, Colombo N, Pujol P, Lorusso D, Mirza MR, Brasiuniene B, Madry R, Brenton JD, Ausems MGEM, Büttner R, Lambrechts D. European experts consensus: BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency testing in first-line ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:276-287. [PMID: 34861371 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Homologous recombination repair (HRR) enables fault-free repair of double-stranded DNA breaks. HRR deficiency is predicted to occur in around half of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. Ovarian cancers harbouring HRR deficiency typically exhibit sensitivity to poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Current guidelines recommend a range of approaches for genetic testing to identify predictors of sensitivity to PARPi in ovarian cancer and to identify genetic predisposition. DESIGN To establish a European-wide consensus for genetic testing (including the genetic care pathway), decision making and clinical management of patients with recently diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, and the validity of biomarkers to predict the effectiveness of PARPi in the first-line setting. The collaborative European experts' consensus group consisted of a steering committee (n = 14) and contributors (n = 84). A (modified) Delphi process was used to establish consensus statements based on a systematic literature search, conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. RESULTS A consensus was reached on 34 statements amongst 98 caregivers (including oncologists, pathologists, clinical geneticists, genetic researchers, and patient advocates). The statements concentrated on (i) the value of testing for BRCA1/2 mutations and HRR deficiency testing, including when and whom to test; (ii) the importance of developing new and better HRR deficiency tests; (iii) the importance of germline non-BRCA HRR and mismatch repair gene mutations for predicting familial risk, but not for predicting sensitivity to PARPi, in the first-line setting; (iv) who should be able to inform patients about genetic testing, and what training and education should these caregivers receive. CONCLUSION These consensus recommendations, from a multidisciplinary panel of experts from across Europe, provide clear guidance on the use of BRCA and HRR deficiency testing for recently diagnosed patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Vergote
- Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - A González-Martín
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain; Program for Solid Tumors at Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - P Harter
- Department of Gynaecology & Gynaecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - N Colombo
- University of Milan-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - P Pujol
- Montpellier Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - D Lorusso
- Department of Women and Child Science and Public Health, Catholic University of Rome, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - M R Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - B Brasiuniene
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute of Lithuania, Faculty of Medicine of Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - R Madry
- Oncological Gynaecology Department, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - J D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - M G E M Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Büttner
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - D Lambrechts
- Department of Human Genetics, VIB and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thompson MK, Gale D, Brenton JD. Circulating tumour DNA for clinicians: current and future clinical applications. Clin Radiol 2021; 76:737-747. [PMID: 34389159 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This review introduces clinicians to the basic concepts of the biology of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), which is required to understand clinical use of ctDNA technology. We provide an overview of how new technology has improved the sensitivity of ctDNA detection over the last decade and the available techniques for ctDNA analysis including whole-genome sequencing (WGS), targeted cancer-associated gene panels, and methylation analysis. We discuss the most recent evidence from clinical trials for ctDNA in patient care including precision treatment of advanced cancers, disease monitoring, improving adjuvant treatment, and screening for early detection of cancer. Finally, we outline how ctDNA is likely to directly impact radiologists, and identify further research required for ctDNA to progress into routine clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Thompson
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK; Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK.
| | - D Gale
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - J D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK; Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Millstein J, Budden T, Goode EL, Anglesio MS, Talhouk A, Intermaggio MP, Leong HS, Chen S, Elatre W, Gilks B, Nazeran T, Volchek M, Bentley RC, Wang C, Chiu DS, Kommoss S, Leung SCY, Senz J, Lum A, Chow V, Sudderuddin H, Mackenzie R, George J, Fereday S, Hendley J, Traficante N, Steed H, Koziak JM, Köbel M, McNeish IA, Goranova T, Ennis D, Macintyre G, Silva De Silva D, Ramón Y Cajal T, García-Donas J, Hernando Polo S, Rodriguez GC, Cushing-Haugen KL, Harris HR, Greene CS, Zelaya RA, Behrens S, Fortner RT, Sinn P, Herpel E, Lester J, Lubiński J, Oszurek O, Tołoczko A, Cybulski C, Menkiszak J, Pearce CL, Pike MC, Tseng C, Alsop J, Rhenius V, Song H, Jimenez-Linan M, Piskorz AM, Gentry-Maharaj A, Karpinskyj C, Widschwendter M, Singh N, Kennedy CJ, Sharma R, Harnett PR, Gao B, Johnatty SE, Sayer R, Boros J, Winham SJ, Keeney GL, Kaufmann SH, Larson MC, Luk H, Hernandez BY, Thompson PJ, Wilkens LR, Carney ME, Trabert B, Lissowska J, Brinton L, Sherman ME, Bodelon C, Hinsley S, Lewsley LA, Glasspool R, Banerjee SN, Stronach EA, Haluska P, Ray-Coquard I, Mahner S, Winterhoff B, Slamon D, Levine DA, Kelemen LE, Benitez J, Chang-Claude J, Gronwald J, Wu AH, Menon U, Goodman MT, Schildkraut JM, Wentzensen N, Brown R, Berchuck A, Chenevix-Trench G, deFazio A, Gayther SA, García MJ, Henderson MJ, Rossing MA, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Fasching PA, Orsulic S, Karlan BY, Konecny GE, Huntsman DG, Bowtell DD, Brenton JD, Doherty JA, Pharoah PDP, Ramus SJ. Prognostic gene expression signature for high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1240-1250. [PMID: 32473302 PMCID: PMC7484370 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Median overall survival (OS) for women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is ∼4 years, yet survival varies widely between patients. There are no well-established, gene expression signatures associated with prognosis. The aim of this study was to develop a robust prognostic signature for OS in patients with HGSOC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Expression of 513 genes, selected from a meta-analysis of 1455 tumours and other candidates, was measured using NanoString technology from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue collected from 3769 women with HGSOC from multiple studies. Elastic net regularization for survival analysis was applied to develop a prognostic model for 5-year OS, trained on 2702 tumours from 15 studies and evaluated on an independent set of 1067 tumours from six studies. RESULTS Expression levels of 276 genes were associated with OS (false discovery rate < 0.05) in covariate-adjusted single-gene analyses. The top five genes were TAP1, ZFHX4, CXCL9, FBN1 and PTGER3 (P < 0.001). The best performing prognostic signature included 101 genes enriched in pathways with treatment implications. Each gain of one standard deviation in the gene expression score conferred a greater than twofold increase in risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02-2.71; P < 0.001]. Median survival [HR (95% CI)] by gene expression score quintile was 9.5 (8.3 to -), 5.4 (4.6-7.0), 3.8 (3.3-4.6), 3.2 (2.9-3.7) and 2.3 (2.1-2.6) years. CONCLUSION The OTTA-SPOT (Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium - Stratified Prognosis of Ovarian Tumours) gene expression signature may improve risk stratification in clinical trials by identifying patients who are least likely to achieve 5-year survival. The identified novel genes associated with the outcome may also yield opportunities for the development of targeted therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Millstein
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - T Budden
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia; CRUK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - M S Anglesio
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A Talhouk
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - M P Intermaggio
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - H S Leong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Chen
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Translational Genomics, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - W Elatre
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA
| | - B Gilks
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - T Nazeran
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - M Volchek
- Anatomical Pathology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - R C Bentley
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, USA
| | - C Wang
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - D S Chiu
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - S Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - S C Y Leung
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - J Senz
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A Lum
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - V Chow
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - H Sudderuddin
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - R Mackenzie
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - J George
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, USA
| | - S Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - J Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - N Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada
| | - J M Koziak
- Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, Calgary, Canada
| | - M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, Canada
| | - I A McNeish
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - T Goranova
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Ennis
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - G Macintyre
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Silva De Silva
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - T Ramón Y Cajal
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J García-Donas
- HM Hospitales D Centro Integral Oncológico HM Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Hernando Polo
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Funcacion Alcorcon, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - G C Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Evanston, USA
| | - K L Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
| | - H R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - C S Greene
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - R A Zelaya
- Department of Genetics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA
| | - S Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E Herpel
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - O Oszurek
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - A Tołoczko
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - C Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - J Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - C L Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA; Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - M C Pike
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Tseng
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - V Rhenius
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - H Song
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - A M Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - C Karpinskyj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - N Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | - C J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Sharma
- Pathology West ICPMR Westmead, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; University of Western Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - P R Harnett
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - R Sayer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - J Boros
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - S J Winham
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - S H Kaufmann
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - M C Larson
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - H Luk
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - B Y Hernandez
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - P J Thompson
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - L R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - M E Carney
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA
| | - B Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - J Lissowska
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, M Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - L Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - M E Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, USA
| | - C Bodelon
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Hinsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - L A Lewsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - R Glasspool
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - S N Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E A Stronach
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Haluska
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Centre Leon Berard and University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - S Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - B Winterhoff
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - D Slamon
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - D A Levine
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Pearlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - L E Kelemen
- Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - J Benitez
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain; Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - J Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - A H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - U Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - M T Goodman
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - N Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - R Brown
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Berchuck
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, USA
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - A deFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - S A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - M J García
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - M J Henderson
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - M A Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - A Beeghly-Fadiel
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA
| | - P A Fasching
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - B Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - G E Konecny
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - D G Huntsman
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| | - D D Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - J D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - J A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - P D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - S J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goranova T, Ennis D, Piskorz AM, Macintyre G, Lewsley LA, Stobo J, Wilson C, Kay D, Glasspool RM, Lockley M, Brockbank E, Montes A, Walther A, Sundar S, Edmondson R, Hall GD, Clamp A, Gourley C, Hall M, Fotopoulou C, Gabra H, Freeman S, Moore L, Jimenez-Linan M, Paul J, Brenton JD, McNeish IA. Correction: Safety and utility of image-guided research biopsies in relapsed high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma-experience of the BriTROC consortium. Br J Cancer 2019; 120:868. [PMID: 30862952 PMCID: PMC6474310 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0433-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
This article was originally published under a CC BY NC SA License, but has now been made available under a CC BY 4.0 License.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Goranova
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - D Ennis
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK
| | - A M Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - G Macintyre
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L A Lewsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - J Stobo
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - C Wilson
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - D Kay
- Department of Radiology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - R M Glasspool
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - M Lockley
- Barts Cancer Institute, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- University College Hospital, London, WC1E 6BD, UK
| | - E Brockbank
- Barts Cancer Institute, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - A Montes
- Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - A Walther
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, BS2 8ED, UK
| | - S Sundar
- City Hospital, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK
| | | | - G D Hall
- St James Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A Clamp
- The Christie Hospital, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - C Gourley
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK
| | - M Hall
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, HA6 2RN, UK
| | | | - H Gabra
- Imperial College, London, W12 0HS, UK
| | - S Freeman
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - L Moore
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | | | - J Paul
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - J D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK.
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - I A McNeish
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK.
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cojocaru E, Parkinson CA, Brenton JD. Personalising Treatment for High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:515-524. [PMID: 29934103 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous group of cancers that differ by cell of origin and genomic features. High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the commonest histiotype and is characterized by extreme genomic complexity and dysregulation of DNA damage repair pathways, particularly homologous recombination deficiency. New insights from molecular profiling into homologous recombination deficiency now offers the credible possibility of personalizing treatment choices for women with HGSOC using poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARP) therapy. Although the presence of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the microenvironment is associated with improved survival in HGSOC, the role of anti-angiogenic and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy remains unclear. PARP inhibition combined with immunotherapy is an exciting combination strategy for future therapeutic development for women with advanced HGSOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Cojocaru
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK
| | - C A Parkinson
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - J D Brenton
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ali HR, Dariush A, Thomas J, Provenzano E, Dunn J, Hiller L, Vallier AL, Abraham J, Piper T, Bartlett JMS, Cameron DA, Hayward L, Brenton JD, Pharoah PDP, Irwin MJ, Walton NA, Earl HM, Caldas C. Lymphocyte density determined by computational pathology validated as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: secondary analysis of the ARTemis trial. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:1832-1835. [PMID: 28525534 PMCID: PMC5834010 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have previously shown lymphocyte density, measured using computational pathology, is associated with pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer. The clinical validity of this finding in independent studies, among patients receiving different chemotherapy, is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS The ARTemis trial randomly assigned 800 women with early stage breast cancer between May 2009 and January 2013 to three cycles of docetaxel, followed by three cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide once every 21 days with or without four cycles of bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was pCR (absence of invasive cancer in the breast and lymph nodes). We quantified lymphocyte density within haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole slide images using our previously described computational pathology approach: for every detected lymphocyte the average distance to the nearest 50 lymphocytes was calculated and the density derived from this statistic. We analyzed both pre-treatment biopsies and post-treatment surgical samples of the tumour bed. RESULTS Of the 781 patients originally included in the primary endpoint analysis of the trial, 609 (78%) were included for baseline lymphocyte density analyses and a subset of 383 (49% of 781) for analyses of change in lymphocyte density. The main reason for loss of patients was the availability of digitized whole slide images. Pre-treatment lymphocyte density modelled as a continuous variable was associated with pCR on univariate analysis (odds ratio [OR], 2.92; 95% CI, 1.78-4.85; P < 0.001) and after adjustment for clinical covariates (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.24-3.67; P = 0.006). Increased pre- to post-treatment lymphocyte density showed an independent inverse association with pCR (adjusted OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.033-0.31; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Lymphocyte density in pre-treatment biopsies was validated as an independent predictor of pCR in breast cancer. Computational pathology is emerging as a viable and objective means of identifying predictive biomarkers for cancer patients. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NCT01093235.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. R. Ali
- Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute
- Department of Pathology
| | - A. Dariush
- Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - J. Thomas
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
| | - E. Provenzano
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
- Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge
| | - J. Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - L. Hiller
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - A.-L. Vallier
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge
| | - J. Abraham
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge
| | - T. Piper
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
| | - J. M. S. Bartlett
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - D. A. Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
| | - L. Hayward
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
| | - J. D. Brenton
- Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge
| | - P. D. P. Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge
| | - M. J. Irwin
- Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - N. A. Walton
- Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - H. M. Earl
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge
| | - C. Caldas
- Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Goranova T, Ennis D, Piskorz AM, Macintyre G, Lewsley LA, Stobo J, Wilson C, Kay D, Glasspool RM, Lockley M, Brockbank E, Montes A, Walther A, Sundar S, Edmondson R, Hall GD, Clamp A, Gourley C, Hall M, Fotopoulou C, Gabra H, Freeman S, Moore L, Jimenez-Linan M, Paul J, Brenton JD, McNeish IA. Safety and utility of image-guided research biopsies in relapsed high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma-experience of the BriTROC consortium. Br J Cancer 2017; 116:1294-1301. [PMID: 28359078 PMCID: PMC5482731 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Investigating tumour evolution and acquired chemotherapy resistance requires analysis of sequential tumour material. We describe the feasibility of obtaining research biopsies in women with relapsed ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). METHODS Women with relapsed ovarian HGSC underwent either image-guided biopsy or intra-operative biopsy during secondary debulking, and samples were fixed in methanol-based fixative. Tagged-amplicon sequencing was performed on biopsy DNA. RESULTS We screened 519 patients in order to enrol 220. Two hundred and two patients underwent successful biopsy, 118 of which were image-guided. There were 22 study-related adverse events (AE) in the image-guided biopsies, all grades 1 and 2; pain was the commonest AE. There were pre-specified significant AE in 3/118 biopsies (2.5%). 87% biopsies were fit-for-purpose for genomic analyses. Median DNA yield was 2.87 μg, and was higher in biopsies utilising 14 G or 16 G needles compared to 18 G. TP53 mutations were identified in 94.4% patients. CONCLUSIONS Obtaining tumour biopsies for research in relapsed HGSC is safe and feasible. Adverse events are rare. The large majority of biopsies yield sufficient DNA for genomic analyses-we recommend use of larger gauge needles and methanol fixation for such biopsies, as DNA yields are higher but with no increase in AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Goranova
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - D Ennis
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK
| | - A M Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - G Macintyre
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L A Lewsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - J Stobo
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - C Wilson
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - D Kay
- Department of Radiology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - R M Glasspool
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - M Lockley
- Barts Cancer Institute, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- University College Hospital, London WC1E 6BD, UK
| | | | - A Montes
- Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - A Walther
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol BS2 8ED, UK
| | - S Sundar
- City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
| | | | - G D Hall
- St James Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A Clamp
- The Christie Hospital, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - C Gourley
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | - M Hall
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood HA6 2RN, UK
| | | | - H Gabra
- Imperial College, London W12 0HS, UK
| | - S Freeman
- Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - L Moore
- Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | | | - J Paul
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - J D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - I A McNeish
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sala E, Mema E, Himoto Y, Veeraraghavan H, Brenton JD, Snyder A, Weigelt B, Vargas HA. Unravelling tumour heterogeneity using next-generation imaging: radiomics, radiogenomics, and habitat imaging. Clin Radiol 2017; 72:3-10. [PMID: 27742105 PMCID: PMC5503113 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 196] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Revised: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Tumour heterogeneity in cancers has been observed at the histological and genetic levels, and increased levels of intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity have been reported to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. This review provides an overview of radiomics, radiogenomics, and habitat imaging, and examines the use of these newly emergent fields in assessing tumour heterogeneity and its implications. It reviews the potential value of radiomics and radiogenomics in assisting in the diagnosis of cancer disease and determining cancer aggressiveness. This review discusses how radiogenomic analysis can be further used to guide treatment therapy for individual tumours by predicting drug response and potential therapy resistance and examines its role in developing radiomics as biomarkers of oncological outcomes. Lastly, it provides an overview of the obstacles in these emergent fields today including reproducibility, need for validation, imaging analysis standardisation, data sharing and clinical translatability and offers potential solutions to these challenges towards the realisation of precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Sala
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - E Mema
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Y Himoto
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - H Veeraraghavan
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - J D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - A Snyder
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - B Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - H A Vargas
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Piskorz AM, Ennis D, Macintyre G, Goranova TE, Eldridge M, Segui-Gracia N, Valganon M, Hoyle A, Orange C, Moore L, Jimenez-Linan M, Millan D, McNeish IA, Brenton JD. Methanol-based fixation is superior to buffered formalin for next-generation sequencing of DNA from clinical cancer samples. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:532-9. [PMID: 26681675 PMCID: PMC4769995 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2015] [Revised: 10/29/2015] [Accepted: 12/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumour samples is a critical component of personalised cancer treatment, but it requires high-quality DNA samples. Routine neutral-buffered formalin (NBF) fixation has detrimental effects on nucleic acids, causing low yields, as well as fragmentation and DNA base changes, leading to significant artefacts. PATIENTS AND METHODS We have carried out a detailed comparison of DNA quality from matched samples isolated from high-grade serous ovarian cancers from 16 patients fixed in methanol and NBF. These experiments use tumour fragments and mock biopsies to simulate routine practice, ensuring that results are applicable to standard clinical biopsies. RESULTS Using matched snap-frozen tissue as gold standard comparator, we show that methanol-based fixation has significant benefits over NBF, with greater DNA yield, longer fragment size and more accurate copy-number calling using shallow whole-genome sequencing (WGS). These data also provide a new approach to understand and quantify artefactual effects of fixation using non-negative matrix factorisation to analyse mutational spectra from targeted and WGS data. CONCLUSION We strongly recommend the adoption of methanol fixation for sample collection strategies in new clinical trials. This approach is immediately available, is logistically simple and can offer cheaper and more reliable mutation calling than traditional NBF fixation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - D Ennis
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - G Macintyre
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - T E Goranova
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - M Eldridge
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - N Segui-Gracia
- Cancer Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - M Valganon
- Cancer Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - A Hoyle
- Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow
| | - C Orange
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - L Moore
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Millan
- Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow
| | - I A McNeish
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
| | - J D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Köbel M, Madore J, Ramus SJ, Clarke BA, Pharoah PDP, Deen S, Bowtell DD, Odunsi K, Menon U, Morrison C, Lele S, Bshara W, Sucheston L, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Thiel FC, Hartmann A, Wachter DL, Anglesio MS, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Høgdall C, Kalli KR, Fridley BL, Keeney GL, Fogarty ZC, Vierkant RA, Liu S, Cho S, Nelson G, Ghatage P, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gayther SA, Benjamin E, Widschwendter M, Intermaggio MP, Rosen B, Bernardini MQ, Mackay H, Oza A, Shaw P, Jimenez-Linan M, Driver KE, Alsop J, Mack M, Koziak JM, Steed H, Ewanowich C, DeFazio A, Chenevix-Trench G, Fereday S, Gao B, Johnatty SE, George J, Galletta L, Goode EL, Kjær SK, Huntsman DG, Fasching PA, Moysich KB, Brenton JD, Kelemen LE. Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:2297-307. [PMID: 25349970 PMCID: PMC4264456 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - J Madore
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Gloucester House–level 3, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - S J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B A Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 Univeristy Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P D P Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - S Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - D D Bowtell
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - K Odunsi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - C Morrison
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - S Lele
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - W Bshara
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - L Sucheston
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - M W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - F C Thiel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - D L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - M S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
| | - E Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2370 Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - C Høgdall
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - K R Kalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - B L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Stabile 13, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Z C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - R A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S Liu
- Anatomic Pathology Research Laboratory, Calgary Laboratory Services, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - S Cho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - P Ghatage
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - S A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - E Benjamin
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London WC1E 6JJ, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - M P Intermaggio
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B Rosen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - H Mackay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - A Oza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P Shaw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - K E Driver
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - M Mack
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J M Koziak
- Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, 2210 2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - C Ewanowich
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - A DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - S Fereday
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - J George
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - L Galletta
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - AOCS Study Group
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S K Kjær
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - D G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
- Centre For Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - P A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - K B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - J D Brenton
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Köbel M, Madore J, Ramus SJ, Clarke BA, Pharoah PDP, Deen S, Bowtell DD, Odunsi K, Menon U, Morrison C, Lele S, Bshara W, Sucheston L, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Thiel FC, Hartmann A, Wachter DL, Anglesio MS, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Høgdall C, Kalli KR, Fridley BL, Keeney GL, Fogarty ZC, Vierkant RA, Liu S, Cho S, Nelson G, Ghatage P, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gayther SA, Benjamin E, Widschwendter M, Intermaggio MP, Rosen B, Bernardini MQ, Mackay H, Oza A, Shaw P, Jimenez-Linan M, Driver KE, Alsop J, Mack M, Koziak JM, Steed H, Ewanowich C, DeFazio A, Chenevix-Trench G, Fereday S, Gao B, Johnatty SE, George J, Galletta L, Goode EL, Kjær SK, Huntsman DG, Fasching PA, Moysich KB, Brenton JD, Kelemen LE. Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study. Br J Cancer 2014. [PMID: 25349970 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.567] [] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - J Madore
- 1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada [2] Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Gloucester House-level 3, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - S J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B A Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 Univeristy Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P D P Pharoah
- 1] Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK [2] Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - S Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - D D Bowtell
- 1] Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia [2] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia [3] Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - K Odunsi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - C Morrison
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - S Lele
- 1] Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA [2] Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - W Bshara
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - L Sucheston
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - M W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - F C Thiel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - D L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - M S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
| | - E Høgdall
- 1] Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark [2] Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2370 Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - C Høgdall
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - K R Kalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - B L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Stabile 13, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Z C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - R A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S Liu
- Anatomic Pathology Research Laboratory, Calgary Laboratory Services, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - S Cho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - P Ghatage
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - S A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - E Benjamin
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London WC1E 6JJ, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - M P Intermaggio
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B Rosen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - H Mackay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - A Oza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P Shaw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- 1] Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK [2] National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - K E Driver
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - M Mack
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J M Koziak
- Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, 2210 2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - C Ewanowich
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - A DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - S Fereday
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - J George
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - L Galletta
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | | | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S K Kjær
- 1] Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark [2] The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - D G Huntsman
- 1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada [2] Centre For Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - P A Fasching
- 1] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany [2] Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - K B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - J D Brenton
- 1] National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK [2] Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK [3] Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK [4] Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ali HR, Irwin M, Morris L, Dawson SJ, Blows FM, Provenzano E, Mahler-Araujo B, Pharoah PD, Walton NA, Brenton JD, Caldas C. Astronomical algorithms for automated analysis of tissue protein expression in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2013; 108:602-12. [PMID: 23329232 PMCID: PMC3593538 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2012] [Revised: 11/15/2012] [Accepted: 11/19/2012] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-throughput evaluation of tissue biomarkers in oncology has been greatly accelerated by the widespread use of tissue microarrays (TMAs) and immunohistochemistry. Although TMAs have the potential to facilitate protein expression profiling on a scale to rival experiments of tumour transcriptomes, the bottleneck and imprecision of manually scoring TMAs has impeded progress. METHODS We report image analysis algorithms adapted from astronomy for the precise automated analysis of IHC in all subcellular compartments. The power of this technique is demonstrated using over 2000 breast tumours and comparing quantitative automated scores against manual assessment by pathologists. RESULTS All continuous automated scores showed good correlation with their corresponding ordinal manual scores. For oestrogen receptor (ER), the correlation was 0.82, P<0.0001, for BCL2 0.72, P<0.0001 and for HER2 0.62, P<0.0001. Automated scores showed excellent concordance with manual scores for the unsupervised assignment of cases to 'positive' or 'negative' categories with agreement rates of up to 96%. CONCLUSION The adaptation of astronomical algorithms coupled with their application to large annotated study cohorts, constitutes a powerful tool for the realisation of the enormous potential of digital pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H R Ali
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 9RN, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 ORE, UK
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - M Irwin
- Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
| | - L Morris
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 ORE, UK
| | - S-J Dawson
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 9RN, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 ORE, UK
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - F M Blows
- Strangeways Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 9RN, UK
| | - E Provenzano
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 ORE, UK
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (ECMC), Cambridge, UK
- Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - B Mahler-Araujo
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 ORE, UK
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (ECMC), Cambridge, UK
- Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - P D Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 9RN, UK
- Strangeways Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 9RN, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (ECMC), Cambridge, UK
| | - N A Walton
- Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK
| | - J D Brenton
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 9RN, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 ORE, UK
| | - C Caldas
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 9RN, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 ORE, UK
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (ECMC), Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Archibald KM, Kulbe H, Kwong J, Chakravarty P, Temple J, Chaplin T, Flak MB, McNeish IA, Deen S, Brenton JD, Young BD, Balkwill F. Sequential genetic change at the TP53 and chemokine receptor CXCR4 locus during transformation of human ovarian surface epithelium. Oncogene 2012; 31:4987-95. [PMID: 22266861 PMCID: PMC3378508 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Early genetic events in the development of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, HGSOC, may define the molecular basis of the profound structural and numerical instability of chromosomes in this disease. To discover candidate genetic changes we sequentially passaged cells from a karyotypically normal hTERT immortalised human ovarian surface epithelial line (IOSE25) resulting in the spontaneous formation of colonies in soft agar. Cell lines (TOSE 1 and 4) established from these colonies had an abnormal karyotype and altered morphology but were not tumorigenic in immunodeficient mice. TOSE cells showed loss of heterozygosity at TP53, increased nuclear p53 immunoreactivity and altered expression profile of p53 target genes. The parental IOSE25 cells contained a missense, heterozygous R175H mutation in TP53 whereas TOSE cells had loss of heterozygosity at the TP53 locus with a new R273H mutation at the previous wild-type TP53 allele. Cytogenetic and array CGH analysis of TOSE cells also revealed a focal genomic amplification of CXCR4, a chemokine receptor commonly expressed by HGSOC cells. TOSE cells had increased functional CXCR4 protein and its abrogation reduced epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR, expression, as well as colony size and number. The CXCR4 ligand, CXCL12, was epigenetically silenced in TOSE cells and its forced expression increased TOSE colony size. TOSE cells had other cytogenetic changes typical of those seen in HGSOC ovarian cancer cell lines and biopsies. In addition, enrichment of CXCR4 pathway in expression profiles from HGSOC correlated with enrichment of a mutated TP53 gene expression signature and of EGFR pathway genes. Our data suggest that mutations in TP53 and amplification of the CXCR4 gene locus may be early events in the development of HGSOC, and associated with chromosomal instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Archibald
- Centre for Cancer and Inflammation, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lawson MH, Cummings NM, Rassl DM, Russell R, Brenton JD, Rintoul RC, Murphy G. S94 Two novel determinants of etoposide resistance in small cell lung cancer. Thorax 2010. [DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.150938.45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
15
|
Lawson MH, Cummings NM, Rassl DM, Vowler SL, Wickens M, Howat WJ, Brenton JD, Murphy G, Rintoul RC. Bcl-2 and β1-integrin predict survival in a tissue microarray of small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2010; 103:1710-5. [PMID: 21063403 PMCID: PMC2994222 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is limited by the development of chemoresistance. Factors associated with chemoresistance in vitro have been difficult to validate in vivo. Both Bcl-2 and β(1)-integrin have been identified as in vitro chemoresistance factors in SCLC but their importance in patients remains uncertain. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are useful to validate biomarkers but no large TMA exists for SCLC. We designed an SCLC TMA to study potential biomarkers of prognosis and then used it to clarify the role of both Bcl-2 and β(1)-integrin in SCLC. METHODS A TMA was constructed consisting of 184 cases of SCLC and stained for expression of Bcl-2 and β(1)-integrin. The slides were scored and the role of the proteins in survival was determined using Cox regression analysis. A meta-analysis of the role of Bcl-2 expression in SCLC prognosis was performed based on published results. RESULTS Both proteins were expressed at high levels in the SCLC cases. For Bcl-2 (n=140), the hazard ratio for death if the staining was weak in intensity was 0.55 (0.33-0.94, P=0.03) and for β(1)-integrin (n=151) was 0.60 (0.39-0.92, P=0.02). The meta-analysis showed an overall hazard ratio for low expression of Bcl-2 of 0.91(0.74-1.09). CONCLUSIONS Both Bcl-2 and β(1)-integrin are independent prognostic factors in SCLC in this cohort although further validation is required to confirm their importance. A TMA of SCLC cases is feasible but challenging and an important tool for biomarker validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H Lawson
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Walton NA, Brenton JD, Caldas C, Irwin MJ, Akram A, Gonzalez-Solares E, Lewis JR, Maccallum PH, Morris LJ, Rixon GT. PathGrid: a service-orientated architecture for microscopy image analysis. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2010; 368:3937-3952. [PMID: 20643686 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
This paper describes 'PathGrid'--an analysis and data integration system, developed initially to meet the demands in the analysis of medical microscopy imaging data. An overview of the current system is given, describing the techniques used in developing the data handling infrastructure and the analysis algorithm development. The use of software created in the context of systems designed for the astronomy domain is noted, specifically infrastructure from the astronomy virtual observatory movement for data discovery, access and workflow management, and astronomical image analysis software adapted for the analysis of high-throughput astronomy imaging surveys. This paper notes the applicability of the techniques from the astronomy domain. The testbed infrastructure deployment is described, emphasizing its speed and ease of use and support. The validity of the analysis techniques is confirmed through the pilot study described here--with the application to a large sample of immunohistochemistry microscopy data obtained in part for assessing the oestrogen receptor status of breast cancers. The analysis showed that the specificity and sensitivity values for the automatic scoring using PathGrid were within the errors of those obtained via a 'gold standard' manual pathologist scoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Walton
- Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Britton P, Duffy SW, Sinnatamby R, Wallis MG, Barter S, Gaskarth M, O'Neill A, Caldas C, Brenton JD, Forouhi P, Wishart GC. One-stop diagnostic breast clinics: how often are breast cancers missed? Br J Cancer 2009; 100:1873-8. [PMID: 19455145 PMCID: PMC2714235 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to estimate the number of patients discharged from a symptomatic breast clinic who subsequently develop breast cancer and to determine how many of these cancers had been ‘missed’ at initial assessment. Over a 3-year period, 7004 patients were discharged with a nonmalignant diagnosis. Twenty-nine patients were subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer over the next 36 months. This equates to a symptomatic ‘interval’ cancer rate of 4.1 per 1000 women in the 36 months after initial assessment (0.9 per 1000 women within 12 months, 2.6 per 1000 women within 24 months). The lowest sensitivity of initial assessment was seen in patients of 40–49 years of age, and these patients present the greatest imaging and diagnostic challenge. Following multidisciplinary review, a consensus was reached on whether a cancer had been missed or not. No delay occurred in 10 patients (35%) and probably no delay in 7 patients (24%). Possible delay occurred in three patients (10%) and definite delay in diagnosis (i.e., a ‘missed’ cancer) occurred in only nine patients (31%). The overall diagnostic accuracy of ‘triple’ assessment is 99.6% and the ‘missed’ cancer rate is 1.7 per 1000 women discharged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Britton
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge Breast Unit, Box 97, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chin SF, Wang Y, Thorne NP, Teschendorff AE, Pinder SE, Vias M, Naderi A, Roberts I, Barbosa-Morais NL, Garcia MJ, Iyer NG, Kranjac T, Robertson JFR, Aparicio S, Tavaré S, Ellis I, Brenton JD, Caldas C. Using array-comparative genomic hybridization to define molecular portraits of primary breast cancers. Oncogene 2006; 26:1959-70. [PMID: 17001317 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
We analysed 148 primary breast cancers using BAC-arrays containing 287 clones representing cancer-related gene/loci to obtain genomic molecular portraits. Gains were detected in 136 tumors (91.9%) and losses in 123 tumors (83.1%). Eight tumors (5.4%) did not have any genomic aberrations in the 281 clones analysed. Common (more than 15% of the samples) gains were observed at 8q11-qtel, 1q21-qtel, 17q11-q12 and 11q13, whereas common losses were observed at 16q12-qtel, 11ptel-p15.5, 1p36-ptel, 17p11.2-p12 and 8ptel-p22. Patients with tumors registering either less than 5% (median value) or less than 11% (third quartile) total copy number changes had a better overall survival (log-rank test: P=0.0417 and P=0.0375, respectively). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on copy number changes identified four clusters. Women with tumors from the cluster with amplification of three regions containing known breast oncogenes (11q13, 17q12 and 20q13) had a worse prognosis. The good prognosis group (Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) <or=3.4) tumors had frequent loss of 16q24-qtel. Genes significantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER), Grade and NPI were used to build k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifiers that predicted ER, Grade and NPI status in the test set with an average misclassification rate of 24.7, 25.7 and 35.7%, respectively. These data raise the prospect of generating a molecular taxonomy of breast cancer based on copy number profiling using tumor DNA, which may be more generally applicable than expression microarray analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S-F Chin
- Cancer Genomics Program, Department of Oncology, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Naderi A, Teschendorff AE, Barbosa-Morais NL, Pinder SE, Green AR, Powe DG, Robertson JFR, Aparicio S, Ellis IO, Brenton JD, Caldas C. A gene-expression signature to predict survival in breast cancer across independent data sets. Oncogene 2006; 26:1507-16. [PMID: 16936776 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Prognostic signatures in breast cancer derived from microarray expression profiling have been reported by two independent groups. These signatures, however, have not been validated in external studies, making clinical application problematic. We performed microarray expression profiling of 135 early-stage tumors, from a cohort representative of the demographics of breast cancer. Using a recently proposed semisupervised method, we identified a prognostic signature of 70 genes that significantly correlated with survival (hazard ratio (HR): 5.97, 95% confidence interval: 3.0-11.9, P = 2.7e-07). In multivariate analysis, the signature performed independently of other standard prognostic classifiers such as the Nottingham Prognostic Index and the 'Adjuvant!' software. Using two different prognostic classification schemes and measures, nearest centroid (HR) and risk ordering (D-index), the 70-gene classifier was also found to be prognostic in two independent external data sets. Overall, the 70-gene set was prognostic in our study and the two external studies which collectively include 715 patients. In contrast, we found that the two previously described prognostic gene sets performed less optimally in external validation. Finally, a common prognostic module of 29 genes that associated with survival in both our cohort and the two external data sets was identified. In spite of these results, further studies that profile larger cohorts using a single microarray platform, will be needed before prospective clinical use of molecular classifiers can be contemplated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Naderi
- Cancer Genomics Program, Department of Oncology, Hutchison/MRC Research Center, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Krubasik D, Iyer NG, English WR, Ahmed AA, Vias M, Roskelley C, Brenton JD, Caldas C, Murphy G. Erratum: Absence of p300 induces cellular phenotypic changes characteristic of epithelial to mesenchyme transition. Br J Cancer 2006. [PMCID: PMC2360626 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
21
|
Earl HM, Ahmed A, Vallier A, Hatcher H, Parkinson CA, Iddawela M, Latimer J, Crawford R, Brenton JD. Cambridge Translational Cancer Research Ovarian Study 01 (CTCR-OV01): Expression profiling of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) to predict chemotherapy response. A randomised phase II trial design with prospective translational endpoints. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.15018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
15018 Methods: CTCR-OV01 is a randomised phase II neoadjuvant study in stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients (pts) were consented for diagnostic and fresh tissue research biopsies, and after diagnosis was confirmed, were randomised (1:1) to: Arm A: Carboplatin AUC 7 every 3 weeks (C) × 3 cycles (cy); then interval debulking surgery (IDS); then C AUC 6 with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q 3w (CT) × 3 cy; and finally paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q 3w (T) × 3 cy. Arm B: T × 3 cy; IDS; CT × 3 cy; C × 3 cy. At IDS further fresh tissue samples were collected. Clinical Endpoints: (i) Partial response rate after three cycles of chemotherapy based on CA125 (CA125 RR) and CT scan (CT RR). (ii) Median progression-free survival (PFS). Translational endpoints: Candidate genes and molecular profiles as predictive markers of response/resistance to C and T. Results: Jan ‘02-Dec ‘04, 48 pts were randomised in a single centre study. 4 patients were excluded from analysis (3pts severe toxicity; 1pt incorrect histopathology), leaving 44 patients (21pts A/23 pts B). Median age 60 yr (range 36–75 yrs); 42/44 serous papillary histology; stage III/IV = 77%/23%; grade I/II/III = 2%/34%/64%. All prognostic factors were well balanced between treatment arms. Median follow-up is 22 months (IQR 17–33.5). CA125 RR to pre-operative chemotherapy was A/B = 65%/60% (p = 1). CT RR was A/B = 47%/35% (p = 0.15). CA125 RR, was significantly associated with improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to non-responders (17.3 v 12.4 months; log rank test p = 0.027). Optimal debulking surgery was possible in A/B = 53%/63%. Median PFS was 14 months (m) (A/B = 13 m/14 m (p = 0.53)). Supervised analysis of Affymetrix expression data showed significant enrichment for differential extracellular gene expression in paclitaxel resistant patients. Conclusions: Prospective controlled randomized trials using neoadjuvant treatment are ideally suited for translational research in EOC and provide unique sample sets molecular analysis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. M. Earl
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A. Ahmed
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A. Vallier
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - H. Hatcher
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - M. Iddawela
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - J. Latimer
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - R. Crawford
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Krubasik D, Iyer NG, English WR, Ahmed AA, Vias M, Roskelley C, Brenton JD, Caldas C, Murphy G. Absence of p300 induces cellular phenotypic changes characteristic of epithelial to mesenchyme transition. Br J Cancer 2006; 94:1326-32. [PMID: 16622451 PMCID: PMC2361417 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
p300 is a transcriptional cofactor and prototype histone acetyltransferase involved in regulating multiple cellular processes. We generated p300 deficient (p300−) cells from the colon carcinoma cell line HCT116 by gene targeting. Comparison of epithelial and mesenchymal proteins in p300− with parental HCT116 cells showed that a number of genes involved in cell and extracellular matrix interactions, typical of ‘epithelial to mesenchyme transition’ were differentially regulated at both the RNA and protein level. p300− cells were found to have aggressive ‘cancer’ phenotypes, with loss of cell–cell adhesion, defects in cell–matrix adhesion and increased migration through collagen and matrigel. Although migration was shown to be metalloproteinase mediated, these cells actually showed a downregulation or no change in the level of key metalloproteinases, indicating that changes in cellular adhesion properties can be critical for cellular mobility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Krubasik
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK
| | - N G Iyer
- Cancer Genomics Program, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, UK
| | - W R English
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK
| | - A A Ahmed
- Cancer Genomics Program, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, UK
| | - M Vias
- Cancer Genomics Program, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, UK
| | - C Roskelley
- Department of Anatomy, University of British Columbia, 2177 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver BC V66T 1Z3, UK
| | - J D Brenton
- Cancer Genomics Program, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, UK
| | - C Caldas
- Cancer Genomics Program, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, UK
| | - G Murphy
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brenton JD, Aparicio SA, Caldas C. Molecular profiling of breast cancer: portraits but not physiognomy. Breast Cancer Res 2001; 3:77-80. [PMID: 11250749 PMCID: PMC138674 DOI: 10.1186/bcr274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2000] [Revised: 10/31/2000] [Accepted: 11/01/2000] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancers differ in response to treatment and may have a divergent clinical course despite having a similar histopathological appearance. New technology using DNA microarrays provides a systematic method to identify key markers for prognosis and treatment response by profiling thousands of genes expressed in a single cancer. Microarray profiling of 38 invasive breast cancers now confirms striking molecular differences between ductal carcinoma specimens and suggests a new classification for oestrogen-receptor negative breast cancer. Future approaches will need to include methods for high-throughput clinical validation and the ability to analyze microscopic samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Brenton
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Drewell RA, Brenton JD, Ainscough JF, Barton SC, Hilton KJ, Arney KL, Dandolo L, Surani MA. Deletion of a silencer element disrupts H19 imprinting independently of a DNA methylation epigenetic switch. Development 2000; 127:3419-28. [PMID: 10903168 DOI: 10.1242/dev.127.16.3419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The H19 imprinted gene is silenced when paternally inherited and active only when inherited maternally. This is thought to involve a cis-acting control region upstream of H19 that is responsible for regulating a number of functions including DNA methylation, asynchronous replication of parental chromosomes and an insulator. Here we report on the function of a 1.2 kb upstream element in the mouse, which was previously shown to function as a bi-directional silencer in Drosophila. The cre-loxP-mediated targeted deletion of the 1.2 kb region had no effect on the maternal allele. However, there was loss of silencing of the paternal allele in many endodermal and other tissues. The pattern of expression was very similar to the expression pattern conferred by the enhancer elements downstream of H19. We could not detect an effect on the expression of the neighbouring imprinted Igf2 gene, suggesting that the proposed boundary element insulating this gene from the downstream enhancers was unaffected. Despite derepression of the paternal H19 allele, the deletion surprisingly did not affect the differential DNA methylation of the locus, which displayed an appropriate epigenetic switch in the parental germlines. Furthermore, the characteristic asynchronous pattern of DNA replication at H19 was also not disrupted by the deletion, suggesting that the sequences that mediate this were also intact. The silencer is therefore part of a complex cis-regulatory region upstream of the H19 gene and acts specifically to ensure the repression of the paternal allele, without a predominant effect on the epigenetic switch in the germline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A Drewell
- Wellcome/CRC Institute of Cancer and Developmental Biology and Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brenton JD, Drewell RA, Viville S, Hilton KJ, Barton SC, Ainscough JF, Surani MA. A silencer element identified in Drosophila is required for imprinting of H19 reporter transgenes in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:9242-7. [PMID: 10430927 PMCID: PMC17764 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The H19 gene is subject to genomic imprinting because it is methylated and repressed after paternal inheritance and is unmethylated and expressed after maternal inheritance. We recently identified a 1.1-kb control element in the upstream region of the H19 gene that functions as a cis-acting silencer element in Drosophila. Here we investigate the function of this element in mice. We demonstrate that both H19-lacZ and H19-PLAP reporter transgenes can undergo imprinting with repression and hypermethylation after paternal transmission at many integration sites. However, transgenes that were deleted for the 1.1-kb silencer element showed loss of paternal repression, but they did not show marked changes in the paternal methylation of the remaining upstream region. This study demonstrates that the 1.1-kb control element identified in Drosophila is required to silence paternally transmitted H19 minitransgenes in mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Brenton
- Wellcome/Cancer Research Campaign Institute of Cancer and Developmental Biology and Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QR, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Brenton JD, Ainscough JF, Lyko F, Paro R, Surani MA. Imprinting and gene silencing in mice and Drosophila. Novartis Found Symp 1998; 214:233-44; discussion 244-50. [PMID: 9601021 DOI: 10.1002/9780470515501.ch14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
H19 and Igf2 are located within a large imprinting domain that confers monoallelic silencing of parental alleles. The silent paternal allele of H19 is hypermethylated and relatively resistant to nucleases. Using a 130 kb yeast artificial chromosome clone, appropriate imprinting of both H19 and Igf2 was observed at single insert loci in transgenic mice. Imprinting was also observed for H19-lacZ transgenes containing 4 kb of upstream sequence, but only at multicopy loci. The H19 RNA is therefore not essential for imprinting. When the H19-lacZ transgene was introduced into Drosophila, a 1.2 kb region was identified within the 4 kb upstream flank that functioned as a bi-directional silencer. This cis element is located within a region that is apparently necessary for imprinting in mice. These studies suggest an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for gene silencing in Drosophila and imprinting in mice. We propose a new model for imprinting of H19 and Igf2 in mice in which silencing of H19 is the default state, and activation of the maternal allele requires a specific activator element.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Brenton
- Wellcome/CRC Institute of Cancer and Developmental Biology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Genomic imprinting as originally described in Sciara is displayed by many organisms. In mammals, X-inactivation and the parent-of-origin-specific silencing of imprinted genes are examples of this phenomenon. A heritable chromatin structural modification may be the critical mechanism in such instances of chromosome condensation and preferential gene inactivation. H19 is an imprinted gene in which the repressed paternal allele is hypermethylated and the compacted chromatin is relatively resistant to digestion by nucleases. In order to uncover underlying conserved epigenetic mechanisms we have introduced a mouse H19 transgene into Drosophila. We show here that a 1.2-kb H19 upstream sequence functions in cis as a parent-of-origin independent silencing element in Drosophila. Strikingly, this cis-acting element is located within an upstream region that is necessary for H19 imprinting in mice. These results suggest involvement of an evolutionary conserved mechanism in both genes silencing in Drosophila and imprinting in mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Lyko
- ZMBH, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|