Safety and Effectiveness of Palliative Drug Treatment in the Last Days of Life-A Systematic Literature Review

CONTEXT

Dying patients commonly experience potentially distressing symptoms. Palliative care guidelines recommend opioids, anticholinergics, antipsychotics, and benzodiazepines for symptom relief.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to systematically review the effectiveness and safety of palliative drug treatment in the last days of life of adult patients, focusing on the management of pain, dyspnea, anxiety, restlessness, and death rattle.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was published before December 2016 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and SveMed+. Studies on safety or effectiveness of drug therapy in dying adults with at least one outcome on symptom control, adverse effects, or survival were included. Data for included studies were extracted. Study quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies.

RESULTS

Of the 5940 unique titles identified, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies assessed anticholinergics for death rattle, providing no evidence that scopolamine hydrobromide and atropine were superior to placebo. Five studies examined drugs for dyspnea, anxiety, or terminal restlessness, providing some evidence supporting the use of morphine and midazolam. Two studies examined opioids for pain, providing some support for morphine, diamorphine, and fentanyl. Eight studies included safety outcomes, revealing no important differences in adverse effects between the interventions and no evidence for midazolam shortening survival.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of evidence concerning the effectiveness and safety of palliative drug treatment in dying patients, and the reviewed evidence provides limited guidance for clinicians to assist in a distinct and significant phase of life.

Characteristics of the case mix, organisation and delivery in cancer palliative care: a challenge for good-quality research

OBJECTIVES

Palliative care (PC) services and patients differ across countries. Data on PC delivery paired with medical and self-reported data are seldom reported. Aims were to describe (1) PC organisation and services in participating centres and (2) characteristics of patients in PC programmes.

METHODS

This was an international prospective multicentre study with a single web-based survey on PC organisation, services and academics and patients' self-reported symptoms collected at baseline and monthly thereafter, with concurrent registrations of medical data by healthcare providers. Participants were patients ≥18 enrolled in a PC programme.

RESULTS

30 centres in 12 countries participated; 24 hospitals, 4 hospices, 1 nursing home, 1 home-care service. 22 centres (73%) had PC in-house teams and inpatient and outpatient services. 20 centres (67%) had integral chemotherapy/radiotherapy services, and most (28/30) had access to general medical or oncology inpatient units. Physicians or nurses were present 24 hours/7 days in 50% and 60% of centres, respectively. 50 centres (50%) had professorships, and 12 centres (40%) had full-time/part-time research staff. Data were available on 1698 patients: 50% females; median age 66 (range 21-97); median Karnofsky score 70 (10-100); 1409 patients (83%) had metastatic/disseminated disease; tiredness and pain in the past 24 hours were most prominent. During follow-up, 1060 patients (62%) died; 450 (44%) <3 months from inclusion and 701 (68%) within 6 months. ANOVA and χ² tests showed that hospice/nursing home patients were significantly older, had poorer performance status and had shorter survival compared with hospital-patients (p<.0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variation in PC services and patients across Europe. Detailed characterisation is the first step in improving PC services and research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01362816.

The European Association for Palliative Care basic dataset to describe a palliative care cancer population: Results from an international Delphi process

BACKGROUND

One of the barriers identified in palliative care research is the lack of common criteria to describe the population.

AIM

The aim of this Delphi process was to obtain consensus on a basic set of core variables to describe or classify a palliative care cancer population.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a five-step international Delphi exercise. A total of 117 experts were invited to participate. Based on a literature review and analyses of existing minimum datasets for national databases, a list of 18 proposed variables was presented in the first Delphi round. The two first rounds focused on which variables to include, and several new variables were proposed. The three last Delphi rounds focused on how the agreed variables should be recorded. Consensus was defined as at least 70% agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 64 experts from 30 countries participated. High consensus was reached on 31 variables, divided between a 'patient form' - date of birth, gender, living situation, education, ethnicity and 12 symptoms - and a 'health-care personnel form' - patient's date of birth, principal diagnosis, date of the principal diagnosis, stage of the cancer disease, site of metastases, present anticancer treatment, main additional diagnoses, stage of the additional diagnoses, medication, weight loss, performance status, cognitive impairment, place of care and provision of care. It was more difficult to agree upon how to record the variables, but consensus was reached on all except ethnicity, vomiting and weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Consensus was reached on a set of core variables and how they should be recorded.

To be involved or not to be involved: a survey of public preferences for self-involvement in decision-making involving mental capacity (competency) within Europe

BACKGROUND

The Council of Europe has recommended that member states of European Union encourage their citizens to make decisions about their healthcare before they lose capacity to do so. However, it is unclear whether the public wants to make such decisions beforehand.

AIM

To examine public preferences for self-involvement in end-of-life care decision-making and identify associated factors.

DESIGN

A population-based survey with 9344 adults in England, Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain.

RESULTS

Across countries, 74% preferred self-involvement when capable; 44% preferred self-involvement when incapable through, for example, a living will. Four factors were associated with a preference for self-involvement across capacity and incapacity scenarios, respectively: higher educational attainment ((odds ratio = 1.93-2.77), (odds ratio = 1.33-1.80)); female gender ((odds ratio = 1.27, 95% confidence interval = 1.14-1.41), (odds ratio = 1.30, 95% confidence interval = 1.20-1.42)); younger-middle age ((30-59 years: odds ratio = 1.24-1.40), (50-59 years: odds ratio = 1.23, 95% confidence interval = 1.04-1.46)) and valuing quality over quantity of life or valuing both equally ((odds ratio = 1.49-1.58), (odds ratio = 1.35-1.53)). Those with increased financial hardship (odds ratio = 0.64-0.83) and a preference to die in hospital (not a palliative care unit) (odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval = 0.60-0.88), a nursing home or residential care (odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval = 0.54-0.99) were less likely to prefer self-involvement when capable. For the incapacity scenario, single people were more likely to prefer self-involvement (odds ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.18-1.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-involvement in decision-making is important to the European public. However, a large proportion of the public prefer to not make decisions about their care in advance of incapacity. Financial hardship, educational attainment, age, and preferences regarding quality and quantity of life require further examination; these factors should be considered in relation to policy.

Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain

BACKGROUND

Cancer end-of-life care (EoLC) policies assume people want to die at home. We aimed to examine variations in preferences for place of death cross-nationally.

METHODS

A telephone survey of a random sample of individuals aged ≥16 in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. We determined where people would prefer to die if they had a serious illness such as advanced cancer, facilitating circumstances, personal values and experiences of illness, death and dying.

RESULTS

Of 9344 participants, between 51% (95% CI: 48% to 54%) in Portugal and 84% (95% CI: 82% to 86%) in the Netherlands would prefer to die at home. Cross-national analysis found there to be an influence of circumstances and values but not of experiences of illness, death and dying. Four factors were associated with a preference for home death in more than one country: younger age up to 70+ (Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain), increased importance of dying in the preferred place (England, Germany, Portugal, Spain), prioritizing keeping a positive attitude (Germany, Spain) and wanting to involve family in decisions if incapable (Flanders, Portugal).

CONCLUSIONS

At least two-thirds of people prefer a home death in all but one country studied. The strong association with personal values suggests keeping home care at the heart of cancer EoLC.

Physical exercise for cancer patients with advanced disease: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Physical exercise can improve cancer patients' functioning and reduce their symptom levels. A randomized, controlled trial was launched to test the hypothesis that physical exercise reduces fatigue and improves physical performance in cancer patients with advanced and incurable disease.

METHODS

Cancer patients (n = 231) with a life expectancy ≤2 years were randomized to a physical exercise group (PEG, n = 121) or a control usual care group (UCG, n = 110). The PEG exercised under supervision 60 minutes twice a week for 8 weeks. Assessments were performed before and after the intervention. The primary outcome was physical fatigue (PF) measured by the Fatigue Questionnaire. Physical performance was a secondary outcome measured by the Shuttle Walk Test (SWT) and hand grip strength (HGS) test. Analyses were performed after multiple imputations for missing data. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier, NCT00397774).

FINDINGS

Thirty-six percent of the PEG were lost to follow-up compared with 23% of the UCG, primarily as a result of disease progression. Seventy-eight PEG and 85 UCG patients completed the intervention. Analyses showed no significant between-group effects in PF. However, clinically and statistically significant between-group effects were found for the SWT and HGS test.

INTERPRETATION

Fatigue was not reduced but physical performance (SWT and HGS test) was significantly improved after 8 weeks of physical exercise. Physical exercise might therefore be a suitable approach for maintaining physical capacity in cancer patients with incurable and advanced disease.

Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review

CONTEXT

The use of unidimensional pain scales such as the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), or Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is recommended for assessment of pain intensity (PI). A literature review of studies specifically comparing the NRS, VRS, and/or VAS for unidimensional self-report of PI was performed as part of the work of the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative on pain assessment.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the use and performance of unidimensional pain scales, with specific emphasis on the NRSs.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed, including citations through April 2010. All abstracts were evaluated by two persons according to specified criteria.

RESULTS

Fifty-four of 239 papers were included. Postoperative PI was most frequently studied; six studies were in cancer. Eight versions of the NRS (NRS-6 to NRS-101) were used in 37 studies; a total of 41 NRSs were tested. Twenty-four different descriptors (15 for the NRSs) were used to anchor the extremes. When compared with the VAS and VRS, NRSs had better compliance in 15 of 19 studies reporting this, and were the recommended tool in 11 studies on the basis of higher compliance rates, better responsiveness and ease of use, and good applicability relative to VAS/VRS. Twenty-nine studies gave no preference. Many studies showed wide distributions of NRS scores within each category of the VRSs. Overall, NRS and VAS scores corresponded, with a few exceptions of systematically higher VAS scores.

CONCLUSION

NRSs are applicable for unidimensional assessment of PI in most settings. Whether the variability in anchors and response options directly influences the numerical scores needs to be empirically tested. This will aid in the work toward a consensus-based, standardized measure.

Pain assessment tools in palliative care: an urgent need for consensus

At present, there is no universally accepted cancer pain assessment tool for use in palliative care (PC). The European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC), therefore, aims to develop an international consensus-based computerised pain assessment tool. As part of this process, we have performed (1) a literature review on pain assessment tools for use in the PC and (2) an international expert survey to gain information on the relevant dimensions for pain assessment in PC. 230 publications were identified, only six met the inclusion criteria. Three further articles were identified through manual searching, totalling 11 different pain assessment tools. Nine tools were multidimensional. Pain intensity was assessed in seven, using various numerical/verbal rating scales (NRS/VRS); five tools focused on pain management. Three publications did not identify the rationale for the need to develop a new tool, and the selection procedure for items/dimensions was not described in six tools. Patient and/or professional expert groups were involved in the development of five tools and only two tools were extensively validated or cross-culturally tested. Thirty-two experts (71%) completed the expert survey and identified 'intensity', 'temporal pattern', 'relief/exacerbation', 'pain quality' and 'location' as the five most relevant dimensions. Most preferred assessment of 'pain intensity' was by NRS rather than VRS. Time windows extending 24 h were regarded as less relevant. Development of PC pain assessment tools seems to be a continuous process, which does not adhere to systematic guidelines, thus does not contribute to a universally accepted tool. No tool contained all relevant dimensions as defined by the experts. Many tools focused on particular dimensions, suggesting that specific research interests may drive the tool development process. Extensive literature reviews, expert and patient input and clinical studies are a needed approach in the development of a new consensus-based pain assessment tool.

The Nordic Specialist Course in Palliative Medicine: evaluation and experiences from the first course 2003-2005

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Palliative medicine is not recognized as a medical specialty in any of the five Nordic countries, but there is a great need for physicians with specialty qualifications to serve on an increasing number of palliative care services. The Associations for Palliative Medicine in the five countries agreed to develop a common Nordic course on a specialty level.

RESULTS

A theoretical training course in six modules in two years was developed, based on the British palliative medicine curriculum and including a limited research project and a written exam. Twenty-two out of 30 students completed the first course as scheduled in 2005, and five more have obtained their course diploma later. The evaluation from the students showed very satisfactory personal experiences and subjective learning outcomes, and a positive influence on the overall development of palliative care in the respective countries.

CONCLUSION

The Nordic Specialist Course in Palliative Medicine has proved a successful Nordic collaboration and may form the basis for a full specialist training programme.

The amount of treatment versus quality of life in patients formerly treated for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the self-reported quality of life (QoL) versus the initial TNM stage and amount of primary and recurrent tumor therapy given in a population of formerly treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. We determined QoL by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ) C30/H&N35 by structured interview. One hundred and twenty-two patients less than 80 years old, who had been diagnosed with HNSCC in western Norway in the period from 1992 to1997, and who had survived until 2000, were identified. Of these patients, 106 were eligible to be included. Ninety-six of these patients agreed to be interviewed. For TNM stage as well as the type of therapy given (local surgery, neck dissection or radiation therapy), T stage predicted the general QoL scores. Both increased TNM stage and all given tumor therapy seemingly caused lower H&N symptom QoL scores. Of the various tumor treatments employed, neck radiation therapy and neck dissection were indicated to be the most closely associated with the H&N QoL scores. Having neck dissection performed seemingly caused impairment beyond what was explained by the initial TNM stage. In conclusion, tumor therapy to HNSCC should not be restricted due to general QoL considerations. Further study of how and when to perform neck treatment is suggested in order to avoid unnecessary reduced H&N QoL.

Predictive value of tumour cell proliferation in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

We previously reported that defects in apoptotic pathways (mutations in the TP53 gene) predicted resistance to doxorubicin monotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether cell proliferation, as assessed by mitotic frequency and Ki-67 levels, may provide additional predictive information in the same tumours and to assess any potential correlations between these markers and mutations in the TP53 gene and erbB-2 overexpression. Surgical specimens were obtained from ninety locally advanced breast cancers before commencing primary chemotherapy consisting of weekly doxorubicin (14 mg/m2) for 16 weeks. 38% of the patients had a partial response (PR) to therapy, 52% had stable disease (SD) while 10% had progressive disease (PD). Univariate analysis showed a significant association between a high cell proliferation rate (expressed as a high mitotic frequency) and resistance to doxorubicin (P = 0.001). Further analyses revealed this association to be limited to the subgroup of tumour expressing wild-type TP53 (P = 0.016), and TP53 mutation status was the only factor predicting drug resistance in the multivariate analyses. The finding that a high mitotic frequency, as well as a high Ki-67 staining, correlated to TP53 mutations (P = 0.001 for both), suggests TP53 mutations are the key predictor of drug resistance, although cell proliferation may play an additional role in tumours harbouring wild-type TP53. Regarding overall (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), multivariate analyses (Cox' proportional hazards regression) revealed a high histological grade and negative oestrogen receptor (ER) status to be the variables that were most strongly related to breast cancer death (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). A key reason for this difference with respect to the factors predicting chemotherapy resistance could be due to the adjuvant use of tamoxifen in all patients harbouring ER-positive tumours.

Influence of TP53 gene alterations and c-erbB-2 expression on the response to treatment with doxorubicin in locally advanced breast cancer

TP53 status [mutations, immunostaining, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH)], expression of c-erbB-2, bcl-2, and histological grading were correlated to the response to doxorubicin monotherapy (14 mg/m2) administered weekly to 90 patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Mutations in the TP53 gene, in particular those affecting or disrupting the loop domains L2 or L3 of the p53 protein, were associated with lack of response to chemotherapy (P = 0.063 for all mutations and P = 0.008 for mutations affecting L2/L3, respectively). Similarly, expression of c-erbB-2 (P = 0.041), a high histological grade (P = 0.023), and lack of expression of bcl-2 (P = 0.018) all predicted chemoresistance. No statistically significant association between either p53 immunostaining or TP53 LOH and response to therapy was recorded, despite the finding that both were associated with TP53 mutation status (p53 immunostaining, P < 0.001; LOH, P = 0.021). Lack of immunostaining for p53 despite mutation of the TP53 gene was particularly seen in tumors harboring nonsense mutations or deletions/splices (7 of 10 negative for staining compared with 4 of 16 with missense mutations). TP53 mutations (total/affecting L2/L3 domains) were associated with expression of c-erbB-2 (P < 0.001 for both), high histological grade (P = 0.001 and P = 0.025), and bcl-2 negativity (P = 0.003 and P = 0.002). TP53 mutations, histological grade, and expression of bcl-2 (but not LOH or c-erbB-2 expression) all predicted for relapse-free as well as breast cancer-specific survival in univariate analysis (Ps between <0.0001 and 0.0155), but only tumor grade was found to be predictive in multivariate analysis (P = 0.01 and P = 0.0007, respectively). Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that certain TP53 mutations predict for resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer patients. However, the observation that the majority of patients with TP53 mutations affecting or disrupting the L2/L3 domains with LOH in addition (n = 12) obtained a partial response (n = 4) or stabilization of disease (n = 5) during chemotherapy suggests redundant mechanisms to compensate for loss of p53 function. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that other defects may act in concert with loss of p53 function, causing resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancers.