Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU patients with pneumonia: United States, 2015-2018

OBJECTIVES

To report on the activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from hospitalized patients with pneumonia in US intensive care units (ICUs) between 2015 and 2018. Activity against all P. aeruginosa and common resistant phenotypes are described to better inform decision-making and support antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

METHODS

In total, 781 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from 28 US hospitals. These isolates were tested for susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution methodology using CLSI (2020) breakpoints. Phenotypes analysed included piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible (NS), cefepime-NS, ceftazidime-NS, meropenem-NS and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR).

RESULTS

Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most potent agent tested (minimum inhibitory concentration to inhibit 50% and 90% of isolates of 0.5 and 2 mg/L, respectively, inhibiting 97.2% at the susceptible breakpoint of ≤4 mg/L). Traditional first-line antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime and ceftazidime) demonstrated <33% susceptibility when P. aeruginosa was NS to one or more agent. Although escalation of therapy to meropenem is commonly employed clinically, meropenem susceptibility ranged from 33.6% to 44.9% if P. aeruginosa was NS to any traditional first-line antipseudomonal β-lactam agent. Conversely, ceftolozane-tazobactam remained active against isolates that were NS to other agents, inhibiting 88.4% of isolates NS to piperacillin-tazobactam, 85.0% of isolates NS to cefepime and ceftazidime, and 90.3% of isolates NS to meropenem. Ceftolozane-tazobactam also maintained activity against 73.0% of DTR isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftolozane-tazobactam maintained high activity against P. aeruginosa isolated from hospitalized patients with pneumonia in US ICUs, and had the greatest activity against isolates NS to one or more antipseudomonal β-lactams and DTR isolates.

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam and Imipenem/Relebactam Cross-Susceptibility Among Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa From Patients With Respiratory Tract Infections in ICU and Non-ICU Wards-SMART United States 2017-2019

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-nonsusceptible and multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa, which are more common in patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) and in patients in intensive care units (ICUs), pose difficult treatment challenges and may require new therapeutic options. Two β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL), are approved for treatment of hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia.

METHODS

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-defined broth microdilution methodology was used to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against P. aeruginosa isolates collected from patients with LRTIs in ICUs (n = 720) and non-ICU wards (n = 914) at 26 US hospitals in 2017-2019 as part of the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) surveillance program.

RESULTS

Susceptibility to commonly used β-lactams including carbapenems was 5-9 percentage points lower and MDR rates 7 percentage points higher among isolates from patients in ICUs than those in non-ICU wards (P < .05). C/T and IMI/REL maintained activity against 94.0% and 90.8% of ICU isolates, respectively, while susceptibility to all comparators except amikacin (96.0%) was 63%-76%. C/T and IMI/REL inhibited 83.1% and 68.1% of meropenem-nonsusceptible (n = 207) and 71.4% and 65.7% of MDR ICU isolates (n = 140), respectively. Among all ICU isolates, only 2.5% were nonsusceptible to both C/T and IMI/REL, while 6.7% were susceptible to C/T but not to IMI/REL and 3.5% were susceptible to IMI/REL but not to C/T.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that susceptibility to both C/T and IMI/REL should be considered for testing at hospitals, as both agents could provide important new options for treating patients with LRTIs, especially in ICUs where collected isolates show substantially reduced susceptibility to commonly used β-lactams.

In Vitro Activity of Imipenem/Relebactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against Clinical Isolates of Gram-negative Bacilli With Difficult-to-Treat Resistance and Multidrug-resistant Phenotypes-Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends, United States 2015-2017

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are frequently defined using the criteria established by Magiorakos et al [Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:268-81]. Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) [Kadri et al, Clin Infect Dis 2018;67:1803-14] is a novel approach to defining resistance in gram-negative bacilli focusing on treatment-limiting resistance to first-line agents (all β-lactams and fluoroquinolones).

METHODS

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-defined broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for imipenem/relebactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, and comparators against respiratory, intraabdominal, and urinary isolates of Enterobacterales (n = 10 516) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2732) collected in 26 US hospitals in 2015-2017.

RESULTS

Among all Enterobacterales, 1.0% of isolates were DTR and 15.6% were MDR; 8.4% of P. aeruginosa isolates were DTR and 32.4% were MDR. MDR rates for Enterobacterales and DTR and MDR rates for P. aeruginosa were significantly higher (P < .05) in isolates collected in intensive care units (ICUs) than in non-ICUs and in respiratory tract isolates than in intraabdominal or urinary tract isolates. In addition, 82.4% of DTR and 92.1% of MDR Enterobacterales and 62.2% of DTR and 82.2% of MDR P. aeruginosa were imipenem/relebactam-susceptible, and 1.5% of DTR and 65.8% of MDR Enterobacterales and 67.5% of DTR and 84.0% of MDR P. aeruginosa were ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible.

CONCLUSIONS

MDR phenotypes defined using the Magiorakos criteria may overcall treatment-limiting resistance in gram-negative bacilli. In the US, DTR Enterobacterales were infrequent, while MDR Enterobacterales isolates and DTR and MDR P. aeruginosa were common. Imipenem/relebactam (Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (P. aeruginosa) retained in vitro activity against most DTR and MDR isolates.

Antimicrobial stewardship and antibiograms: importance of moving beyond traditional antibiograms

The rapid evolution of resistance, particularly among Gram-negative bacteria, requires appropriate identification of patients at risk followed by administration of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy. A primary tenet of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is the establishment of empiric antibiotic recommendations for commonly encountered infections. An important tool in providing empiric antibiotic therapy recommendations is the use of an antibiogram. While the majority of institutions use a traditional antibiogram, ASPs have an opportunity to enhance antibiogram data. The authors provide the rationale for why ASPs should implement alternative antibiograms, and the importance of incorporating an antibiogram into clinical decision support systems with the goal of providing effective empiric antibiotic therapy.

Epidemiology and regional variation of nonsusceptible and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from intensive versus non-intensive care units across multiple centers in the United States

Nonsusceptible (NS) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PsA) infections are associated with considerable mortality. This retrospective study assessed NS PsA and MDR PsA prevalence in US intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings. We evaluated nonduplicate PsA isolates collected in 2017. Data were classified by hospital admission setting. PsA isolates were evaluated for NS to each of 4 drug classes and MDR. Significantly higher rates of NS PsA and MDR PsA were found in ICU versus non-ICU settings (P < .001), except for respiratory isolates, which had high rates regardless of setting; rates also correlated with source, hospital size, urban/rural status, and geographic region. NS PsA isolates for each antibacterial category (except fluoroquinolones) and MDR PsA were significantly more likely to be classified as hospital-onset than admission-onset (P < .001). These data are consistent with previous reports and emphasize the importance of testing for resistant infection upon admission and when treating hospital-acquired infections.

Evaluation of Renal Safety Between Imipenem/Relebactam and Colistin Plus Imipenem in Patients With Imipenem-Nonsusceptible Bacterial Infections in the Randomized, Phase 3 RESTORE-IMI 1 Study

Background

In the randomized controlled RESTORE-IMI 1 clinical trial (NCT02452047), imipenem/cilastatin (IMI) with relebactam (IMI/REL) was as effective as colistin plus IMI for the treatment of imipenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative infections. Differences in nephrotoxicity were observed between treatment arms. As there is no standard definition of nephrotoxicity used in clinical trials, we conducted analyses to further understand the renal safety profile of both treatments.

Methods

Nephrotoxicity was retrospectively evaluated using 2 acute kidney injury assessment criteria (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes [KDIGO] and Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage Kidney Disease [RIFLE]). Additional outcomes included time to onset of protocol-defined nephrotoxicity and incidence of renal adverse events.

Results

Of 47 participants receiving treatment, 45 had sufficient data to assess nephrotoxicity (IMI/REL, n = 29; colistin plus IMI, n = 16). By KDIGO criteria, no participants in the IMI/REL but 31.3% in the colistin plus IMI group experienced stage 3 acute kidney injury. No IMI/REL-treated participants experienced renal failure by RIFLE criteria, vs 25.0% for colistin plus IMI. Overall, the time to onset of nephrotoxicity varied considerably (2–22 days). Fewer renal adverse events (12.9% vs 37.5%), including discontinuations due to drug-related renal adverse events (0% vs 12.5%), were observed in the IMI/REL group compared with the colistin plus IMI group, respectively.

Conclusions

Our analyses confirm the findings of a preplanned end point and provide further evidence that IMI/REL had a more favorable renal safety profile than colistin-based therapy in patients with serious, imipenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative bacterial infections.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT02452047.

Comparison of the In Vitro Susceptibility of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam With the Cumulative Susceptibility Rates of Standard Antibiotic Combinations When Tested Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa From ICU Patients With Bloodstream Infections or Pneumonia

Background

Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains an important cause of hospital-acquired infections in the United States and is frequently multidrug-resistant (MDR). The Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines recommend empiric combination therapy that includes an antipseudomonal β-lactam with an aminoglycoside or fluoroquinolone likely to cover ≥95% of P. aeruginosa infections in seriously ill patients at risk of having an MDR pathogen. Ceftolozane is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin, combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam. Ceftolozane-tazobactam is approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. A phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia including ventilator-associated pneumoniae was recently completed. We compared the in vitro susceptibility rate of ceftolozane-tazobactam with the cumulative susceptibility rates of antibiotic combinations commonly used against P. aeruginosa.

Methods

Isolates were collected from intensive care unit patients hospitalized in 32 US hospitals from 2011 to 2017. The susceptibilities of 1543 P. aeruginosa isolates from bloodstream infections (198 isolates, 12.8%) or pneumonia (1345 isolates, 87.2%) were determined for ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators.

Results

The most active antimicrobials were colistin (99.4% susceptible), amikacin (98.1% susceptible), and ceftolozane-tazobactam (96.5% susceptible). The susceptibilities to other antipseudomonal β-lactams and fluoroquinolones were <84%. A cumulative susceptibility of ≥95% was reached for cefepime, ceftazidime, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam only in combination with amikacin due to the lower susceptibilities of gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin. Monotherapies that exceeded 95% were ceftolozane-tazobactam, amikacin, and colistin.

Conclusions

Ceftolozane-tazobactam monotherapy is likely to be active against more isolates than a combination of another β-lactam and a fluoroquinolone or gentamicin for serious P. aeruginosa infections.

Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Gram-Negative Pathogens in ICU and Non-ICU Settings in US Hospitals in 2017: A Multicenter Study

Background

Infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens resistant to carbapenems have limited treatment options and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the rates, infection sources, and pathogen types associated with carbapenem-nonsusceptible (Carb-NS) Gram-negative isolates in intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings in a large US hospital database.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of carbapenem susceptibility of all nonduplicate isolates of Gram-negative pathogens collected from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, at 358 US hospitals in the BD Insights Research Database. Carb-NS isolates included all pathogens reported at the institutional level as intermediate or resistant.

Results

Of 312 075 nonduplicate Gram-negative isolates, 10 698 (3.4%) were Carb-NS. Respiratory samples were the most frequent source of Carb-NS isolates (35.2%); skin/wound accounted for 23.6%. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common Carb-NS pathogen (58.5% of isolates), and about 30% were Enterobacteriaceae. The highest rates of Carb-NS were found in Acinetobacter spp. (35.6%) and P. aeruginosa (14.6%). The rate of Carb-NS was significantly higher in ICU (5.4%) vs non-ICU settings (2.7%; P < .0001 in univariate analysis). This difference remained significant in multivariable analysis after adjusting for infection and hospital characteristics (odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.17–1.56; P < .0001).

Conclusions

Infections caused by Carb-NS isolates pose a significant clinical problem across different sources of infection, species of pathogen, and hospital settings. Widespread infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship initiatives, in combination with new treatment options, may be required to reduce the burden of carbapenem resistance in health care settings.

Dalbavancin: A New Option for the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections

Objective:

To review the pharmacology, microbiology, chemistry, in vitro susceptibility, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, tolerability, dosage, and administration of dalbavancin, a new semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE search, restricted to the English language, was conducted from 1966 through January 2006. Supplementary sources included program abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, American Society of Microbiology, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America from 2000 to 2005 and information available from the manufacturer's Web site.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

In vitro and preclinical studies, as well as Phase I, II, and III clinical trials, were evaluated to summarize the microbiology, pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of dalbavancin. All published trials and abstracts citing dalbavancin were selected.

Data Synthesis:

Dalbavancin, a novel lipoglycopeptide, has a mechanism of action similar to that of other glycopeptides. It has in vitro activity against a variety of gram-positive organisms, but no activity against gram-negative or vancomycin-resistant enterococci that possess VanA gene. Due to its prolonged half-life (6–10 days), dalbavancin can be administered intravenously once weekly. In Phase II and III clinical trials, dalbavancin was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections, catheter-related bloodstream infections, and skin and skin-structure infections. To date, adverse events are mild and limited; the most common include pyrexia, headache, nausea, oral candidiasis, diarrhea, and constipation.

Conclusions:

Dalbavancin appears to be a promising antimicrobial agent for the treatment of gram-positive infections. A new drug application was filed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2004. The FDA issued an approvable letter in 2005 for dalbavancin. If approved, dalbavancin is expected to be launched in the first quarter of 2006.

Risk factors for systemic vancomycin exposure following administration of oral vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for systemic exposure to vancomycin (VAN) following administration of oral vancomycin (POV) for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).

DESIGN

Prospective, observational, single-center case series.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Hospitalized patients with suspected or confirmed CDI who received POV for at least 5 days.

INTERVENTION

Random VAN serum levels were obtained on days 5, 10, and weekly thereafter in patients treated for ≥ 5 days with POV without concomitant intravenous VAN.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Of 117 random VAN serum levels from 85 patients, 58 patients (68.2%) had one or more detectable (≥ 0.05 μg/ml) levels and 15 (17.6%) of 85 patients had one or more levels > 2.5 μg/ml. Risk factors for detectable VAN exposure following administration of POV included POV dosages > 500 mg/day (odds ratio [OR] 35.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.56-169.8), the presence of severe CDI (OR 4.11, 95% CI 2.76-10.83, p=0.028), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.02-14.21, p=0.032), and the administration of POV ≥ 10 days (OR 6.71, 95% CI 1.81-24.83, p=0.0025). Risk factors for exposure to serum VAN concentrations > 2.5 μg/ml included the presence of gastrointestinal (GI) pathology (OR 5.22, 95% CI 3.45-18.3, p=0.031), ICU admission (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.40-10.28, p=0.022), the use of VAN retention enemas (OR 4.73, 95% CI 2.42-20.39, p=0.036), and having a creatinine clearance ≤ 50 ml/minute or undergoing hemodialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy (OR 4.03, 95% CI 1.26-12.84, p=0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum VAN levels were detected in 58 (68.2%) of 85 patients receiving POV for CDI. Risk factors for systemic exposure to VAN following administration of POV included ICU admission; VAN dosages > 500 mg/day; administration ≥ 10 days or as retention enemas; and the presence of severe CDI, renal dysfunction, or inflammatory conditions of the GI tract. Unique to our study, we identified ICU admission and the concomitant use of VAN retention enemas to be significant risk factors for systemic exposure to VAN.

Clinical Outcomes of Daptomycin for Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus Bacteremia

PURPOSE

In light of recent evidence suggesting enhancement of daptomycin activity against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) by ampicillin and other β-lactam antibiotics, we evaluated the safety profile and clinical efficacy of daptomycin with and without concomitant β-lactam antimicrobials in the treatment of VRE (faecium or faecalis) bacteremia from multiple centers across the United States.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively as part of a larger multicenter registry (The Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience). Efficacy and clinical outcomes in patients with VRE bacteremia who received at least 3 days of daptomycin with or without concomitant β-lactams were analyzed. Although all the cases involved daptomycin-susceptible VRE, additional analysis was performed to examine whether the adjunctive β-lactam would play a more pivotal role in cases where the daptomycin MIC was in the upper limit of the susceptibility range, indicating that daptomycin monotherapy efficacy may be relatively compromised compared with cases with lower daptomycin MICs.

FINDINGS

Two hundred sixty-two patients from 33 hospitals were evaluated. Most patients had at least one significant comorbidity, such as solid-organ or bone marrow transplantation (16%), neutropenia (36%), dialysis dependency (20%), or critical illness (36%) requiring care in an intensive care unit. Overall treatment success was 86% (n = 225/262), and treatment success for patients taking concomitant β-lactams was 86% (n = 105/122). Logistic regression identified treatment failure to be associated with sepsis (odds ratio = 3.42; P = 0.009) and an elevated daptomycin MIC (3-4 µg/mL) (odds ratio = 3.23, P = 0.013). No significant increase in clinical failure was seen among patients with elevated daptomycin MIC who received concomitant β-lactam therapy (clinical success, 88% vs 79% for MIC ≤2 vs 3-4 µg/mL, respectively; P = 0.417). Of 262 patients, 33 (13%) experienced ≥1 adverse event possibly related to daptomycin (increased creatine kinase in 8 patients).

IMPLICATIONS

Overall, daptomycin was effective and well tolerated for VRE bacteremia, with lower effectiveness noted with daptomycin MIC of 3 to 4 µg/mL. Concomitant β-lactam therapy with daptomycin may improve clinical outcomes in this setting. Further studies are needed to characterize the potential benefit of concomitant β-lactams with daptomycin.

Outcomes and metrics for antimicrobial stewardship: survey of physicians and pharmacists

We conducted a survey to compare antimicrobial stewardship outcomes considered to be most important with those used in practice as metrics. Respondent opinion of important outcomes compared with those collected as metrics were antimicrobial use (15% vs 73%), antimicrobial cost (10% vs 73%), appropriateness of antimicrobial use (56% vs 51%), infection-related mortality rate (34% vs 7%), and antibiotic-associated length of stay (22% vs 12%). Patient outcomes are important to many practitioners but are rarely used as metrics.

Antimicrobial stewardship: philosophy versus practice

To promote the judicious use of antimicrobials and preserve their usefulness in the setting of growing resistance, a number of policy-making bodies and professional societies have advocated the development of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Although these programs have been implemented at many institutions in the United States, their impact has been difficult to measure. Current recommendations advocate the use of both outcome and process measures as metrics for antimicrobial stewardship. Although patient outcome metrics have the greatest impact on the quality of care, the literature shows that antimicrobial use and costs are the indicators measured most frequently by institutions to justify the effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The measurement of more meaningful outcomes has been constrained by difficulties inherent to these measures, lack of funding and resources, and inadequate study designs. Antimicrobial stewardship can be made more credible by refocusing the antimicrobial review process to target specific disease states, reassessing the usefulness of current metrics, and integrating antimicrobial stewardship program initiatives into institutional quality and safety efforts.

Role of Unit-Specific Combination Antibiograms for Improving the Selection of Appropriate Empiric Therapy for Gram-Negative Pneumonia

In an effort to improve the selection of appropriate empiric gram-negative therapy for pneumonia, we examined intensive care unit-specific combination antibiograms. These antibiograms were able to predict appropriate empiric gram-negative therapy. Empiric combination therapy based on unit-specific combination antibiograms may aid in the selection of therapy for gram-negative pneumonia.

Vancomycin Use During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

We reviewed the frequency and duration of vancomycin use during 93 left ventricular assist device placements. Vancomycin prophylaxis was administered for a mean duration (± standard deviation) of 10.5 ± 11 days. Empirical vancomycin use was frequent, with a mean duration (± standard deviation) of therapy of 9.8 ± 9 days (median, 8 days) given during 81 (87%) of the implantations. The most common indications for empirical vancomycin treatment were isolated leukocytosis or driveline drainage. Strategies to improve vancomycin use during left ventricular assist device support should be considered.

Knowledge and attitudes of doctor of pharmacy students regarding the appropriate use of antimicrobials

Pharmacists are key partners in antimicrobial stewardship efforts, yet their degree of education on and attitudes toward this topic during training are not well documented. An electronic survey measuring knowledge and attitudes regarding antimicrobial use and resistance was administered to graduating pharmacy students at 12 US schools of pharmacy. Of 1445 pharmacy students, 579 (40%) completed the survey. The vast majority (94%) believed that strong knowledge of antimicrobials was important for their pharmacy careers, and 89% desired more education on appropriate antimicrobial use. Most students (84%) considered their pharmacy education regarding antimicrobials useful or very useful, but there was significant variability on perceptions of preparation for most antimicrobial stewardship activities according to the students' school. The mean number of correct answers on a section of 11 knowledge questions was 5.8 (standard deviation 2.0; P value for score between schools <.001). On multivariable linear regression analysis, significant predictors of a higher knowledge score were pharmacy school attended, planned postgraduate training, completion of a clinical rotation in infectious diseases, perception of pharmacy school education as useful, use of resources to answer the knowledge questions, and use of Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines and smartphone applications as frequent resources for learning about antimicrobials. Pharmacy students perceive antimicrobial stewardship to be an important healthcare issue and desire more education on the subject. Student perceptions of antimicrobial coursework and actual antimicrobial knowledge scores significantly varied by the school of pharmacy attended. Sharing of best practices among institutions may enhance the preparation of future pharmacists to contribute to effective antimicrobial stewardship.

Breaking down the barriers: challenges with development and implementation of an industry-sponsored antimicrobial stewardship data collection and analysis tool

Partnership between clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry with a focus on antimicrobial stewardship research initiatives is a necessary step toward meeting the shared goals of combating inappropriate antimicrobial use, improving patient outcomes, and minimizing resistance development. Achieving these goals requires outcomes-focused data collection and monitoring tools for antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) that consider real-world data about how antimicrobials are used to treat patients. Here we highlight the experiences and challenges associated with the development and implementation of an industry-sponsored electronic antimicrobial stewardship data collection and analysis tool (AS-DCAT). The benefits and risks of the industry-sponsored AS-DCAT from the perspectives of the sponsoring company and participating sites are discussed. Barriers encountered as well as general considerations and recommendations for preventing or overcoming those barriers for future studies and tool development are provided.

Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection

There has been dramatic change in the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) since the turn of the 21st century noted by a marked increase in incidence and severity, occurring at a disproportionately higher frequency in older patients. Historically considered a nosocomial infection associated with antibiotic exposure, CDI has now also emerged in the community in populations previously considered low risk. Emerging risk factors and disease recurrence represent continued challenges in the management of CDI. The increased incidence and severity associated with CDI has coincided with the emergence and rapid spread of a previously rare strain, ribotype 027. Recent data from the United States and Europe suggest that the incidence of CDI may have reached a crescendo in the recent years and is perhaps beginning to plateau. The acute care direct costs of CDI were estimated to be US$4.8 billion in 2008. However, nearly all the published studies have focused on CDI diagnosed and treated in the acute care hospital setting and fail to measure the burden outside the hospital, including recently discharged patients, outpatients, and those in long-term care facilities. Enhanced surveillance methods are needed to monitor the incidence, to identify populations at risk, and to characterize the molecular epidemiology of strains causing CDI.

Ceftaroline fosamil: a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, microbiology, chemistry, in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, dosage, and administration of ceftaroline fosamil (Teflaro, Forest Laboratories, Inc.), a novel parenteral broad-spectrum cephalosporin approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on October 29, 2010, for the treatment of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP).

DATA SOURCES

A search of MEDLINE (1966-July 2011) using the search terms ceftaroline fosamil, ceftaroline, TAK-599, PPI-0903, PPI-0903M, and T-91825 was performed. Supplementary sources included program abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, American Society of Microbiology, European Congress on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America from 2005 to 2010, as well as information available from the manufacturer's Web site.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All English-language articles identified from the data sources were evaluated. In vitro, preclinical, and Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Clinical trials have been conducted evaluating use of ceftaroline for treatment of ABSSSI and CABP. Safety data from Phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials suggest that it is well tolerated and has a safety and tolerability profile common to the cephalosporin class. Ceftaroline has excellent in vitro activity against gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which makes it an attractive monotherapy for the treatment of ABSSSI. However, it lacks activity against problem gram-negative bacteria (eg, Pseudomonas spp.), which will likely limit its use for serious health care-associated infections. While its role in treating CABP is supported by excellent in vitro activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae and clinical efficacy data, currently available comparators may offer some advantages over ceftaroline. Finally, data are lacking to assess its role in the treatment of serious infections due to MRSA (eg, pneumonia, bacteremia).

CONCLUSIONS

These considerations should be part of the formulary review process; however, when considering the significant role MRSA plays in ABSSSI in both the community and hospital settings, we believe that ceftaroline will provide clinicians with a welcome option in addition to currently available anti-MRSA therapies for the treatment of ABSSSI.

Evaluation of hospital room assignment and acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Clostridium difficile spores persist in hospital environments for an extended period. We evaluated whether admission to a room previously occupied by a patient with C. difficile infection (CDI) increased the risk of acquiring CDI.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Medical intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

Patients admitted from January 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006, were evaluated for a diagnosis of CDI 48 hours after ICU admission and within 30 days after ICU discharge. Medical, ICU, and pharmacy records were reviewed for other CDI risk factors. Admitted patients who did develop CDI were compared with admitted patients who did not.

RESULTS

Among 1,844 patients admitted to the ICU, 134 CDI cases were identified. After exclusions, 1,770 admitted patients remained for analysis. Of the patients who acquired CDI after admission to the ICU, 4.6% had a prior occupant without CDI, whereas 11.0% had a prior occupant with CDI (P = .002). The effect of room on CDI acquisition remained a significant risk factor (P = .008) when Kaplan-Meier curves were used. The prior occupant's CDI status remained significant (p = .01; hazard ratio, 2.35) when controlling for the current patient's age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, exposure to proton pump inhibitors, and antibiotic use.

CONCLUSIONS

A prior room occupant with CDI is a significant risk factor for CDI acquisition, independent of established CDI risk factors. These findings have implications for room placement and hospital design.

Comparison of echinocandin antifungals

The incidence of invasive fungal infections, especially those due to Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp., continues to increase. Despite advances in medical practice, the associated mortality from these infections continues to be substantial. The echinocandin antifungals provide clinicians with another treatment option for serious fungal infections. These agents possess a completely novel mechanism of action, are relatively well-tolerated, and have a low potential for serious drug-drug interactions. At the present time, the echinocandins are an option for the treatment of infections due Candida spp (such as esophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis, and candidemia). In addition, caspofungin is a viable option for the treatment of refractory aspergillosis. Although micafungin is not Food and Drug Administration-approved for this indication, recent data suggests that it may also be effective. Finally, caspofungin- or micafungin-containing combination therapy should be a consideration for the treatment of severe infections due to Aspergillus spp. Although the echinocandins share many common properties, data regarding their differences are emerging at a rapid pace. Anidulafungin exhibits a unique pharmacokinetic profile, and limited cases have shown a potential far activity in isolates with increased minimum inhibitory concentrations to caspofungin and micafungin. Caspofungin appears to have a slightly higher incidence of side effects and potential for drug-drug interactions. This, combined with some evidence of decreasing susceptibility among some strains of Candida, may lessen its future utility. However, one must take these findings in the context of substantially more data and use with caspofungin compared with the other agents. Micafungin appears to be very similar to caspofungin, with very few obvious differences between the two agents.

Safety and clinical outcomes among older adults receiving daptomycin therapy: Insights from a patient registry

BACKGROUND

Serious gram-positive bacterial infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality among older adults and can present significant challenges to clinicians. Data evaluating the safety and effectiveness of newer agents in this population are limited.

OBJECTIVE

Daptomycin is a lipopeptide with activity against resistant gram-positive organisms. To better understand the overall safety and effectiveness of daptomycin in older adults (≥66 years of age), the authors reviewed the data that were collected as part of an ongoing registry maintained by Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Lexington, Massachusetts), the manufacturer of daptomycin.

METHODS

The Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience (CORE) is a multicenter, retrospective registry designed to collect postmarketing clinical data on patients who received daptomycin. The CORE data collected from 58 institutions across the United States between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007, were analyzed to better understand the overall safety profile of daptomycin and the clinical outcomes of older adults who were treated with this agent. Patients were considered to be nonevaluable if the medical record did not contain sufficient information to determine response at the end of therapy. Nonevaluable patients were excluded from the clinical outcome analysis but included in the safety analysis.

RESULTS

The registry contained 1073 patients aged ≥66 years who received daptomycin; 23.8% (255/1073) were ≥81 years of age. Overall, 18.1% (194/1073) of patients experienced 324 adverse events, and 6.2% (67/1073) of patients experienced 97 adverse events that were considered possibly related to treatment with daptomycin. The most frequently reported adverse events that were considered possibly treatment related included creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevations, gastrointestinal disorders, and skin rashes. Among the 67 patients who experienced ≥1 adverse event that was possibly related to daptomycin, 30 discontinued therapy due to the adverse event (13 due to CPK elevation). Overall, 78.7% (844/1073) of patients were considered evaluable for clinical outcomes. The clinical success rate for all evaluable patients was 90.2% (761/844). The success rate for evaluable patients ≥81 years of age (88.6% [171/193]) was comparable to that of the overall population.

CONCLUSION

Experience with daptomycin in this group of older adults suggests good tolerability and clinical outcomes that are consistent with the results of other studies published to date.

Outcomes of therapy: vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia in hematology and bone marrow transplant patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with the treatment failure and 30-day mortality in hematology and bone marrow transplant patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bacteremia. The safety and tolerability of therapy was also assessed.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included adult patients admitted to the hematology or bone marrow transplant service with documented vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium or Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia and received at least 48 h of either linezolid or daptomycin as primary treatment. Clinical and microbiologic outcomes were assessed at day 7, 14, and 30 of hospital stay.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were included in the analysis. Forty-three patients received daptomycin as primary treatment and 29 received linezolid as primary treatment. Overall success rate at day 7 was 81.9%, day 14 success rate was 79.2%, and day 30 success rate was 76.4% for all patients. Forty-one patients (57.0%) had high-grade bacteremia defined as greater than one positive blood culture for VRE. The mortality rate was significantly higher if high-grade bacteremia was present (34.1% vs. 7.0%; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that linezolid and daptomycin are both reasonable options for treating VRE bacteremia in hematology and bone marrow transplant patients; however, patients with high-grade VRE bacteremia may be at increased risk for treatment failure.

Managing antimicrobial resistance in intensive care units

The challenges in managing patients with infection in the intensive care unit are increased in an era where there are dwindling antimicrobial choices for multidrug-resistant pathogens. Clinicians in the intensive care unit must balance between choosing appropriate antimicrobial treatment for patients with suspected infection and utilizing antimicrobials in a judicious fashion. Improving antimicrobial utilization is a critical component to reducing antimicrobial resistance. Although providing effective antimicrobial therapy and improving antimicrobial utilization may seem to be competing goals, there are effective strategies to accomplish both. Antimicrobial stewardship programs provide an organized way to implement these strategies and can enhance the intensive care unit physician's success in improving patient outcomes and combating antimicrobial resistance in the intensive care unit.

Drug costs and utilization after implementation of a posaconazole prophylaxis protocol in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia

PURPOSE

Drug costs and utilization after implementation of a posaconazole prophylaxis protocol in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) were studied.

METHODS

Adult patients who initiated induction or reinduction chemotherapy for the treatment of AML between December 1, 2006, and March 31, 2008, at a tertiary care hospital were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups: preprotocol (treated before June 1, 2007) and postprotocol (treated on or after June 1, 2007). Medical charts, including pharmacy and laboratory data, were reviewed for all patients. Outcomes measured included antifungal and antibacterial drug costs and utilization and total pharmacy costs.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients were evaluated (33 in each group). Baseline characteristics, except patient age, were similar between groups. Each group incurred similar costs and utilized resources for similar periods of time as evidenced by similar lengths of stay, duration of neutropenia, and mortality. Antibacterial costs, total pharmacy costs, and other utilization outcomes were also similar between the two groups. Alterations to antifungal management strategy occurred more often in the postprotocol group (33% versus 58%, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a posaconazole protocol did not significantly alter antifungal or antibacterial drug costs or utilization or total pharmacy costs. Prophylactic posaconazole was frequently changed to alternative antifungal therapy due to an adverse drug event, perceived lack of efficacy, avoidance of a drug interaction, or inability to tolerate oral intake.

Systemic absorption of oral vancomycin in a peripheral blood stem cell transplant patient with severe graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract

Oral vancomycin is often considered the drug of choice for severe Clostridium difficile-associated disease due to both its efficacy and pharmacokinetics. The potential for absorption is not well described in patients with impaired gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa. We describe a case of significant and potentially toxic absorption of oral vancomycin in a peripheral blood stem cell transplant patient with grade IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the GI tract. In patients with GI GVHD clinicians need to be aware of the potential for oral absorption and, in select cases, monitoring of levels may be appropriate.

Institutional Experience with Voriconazole Compared with Liposomal Amphotericin B as Empiric Therapy for Febrile Neutropenia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness, safety, and cost of empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia before and after implementing an algorithm in which voriconazole was substituted for liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

SETTING

An 850-bed tertiary care hospital, which is also a referral site for patients with acute leukemia.

PATIENTS

Fifty-five adult patients who started empiric antifungal therapy for febrile neutropenia between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2003, encompassing 58 treatment episodes (defined as a hospitalization during which empiric antifungal therapy was administered).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Medical charts, including patients' pharmacy and laboratory data, were reviewed. Twenty-six and 32 episodes of L-AmB and voriconazole use, respectively, were identified. No significant differences between the L-AmB and voriconazole groups were noted at baseline. Rates of fever resolution (54% vs 59%, p=0.791) and breakthrough invasive fungal infections (11% vs 12%, p>0.999) were similar for the L-AmB and voriconazole episodes. Premature drug discontinuation due to the prescriber's perceived lack of efficacy occurred most frequently in the voriconazole group (25% vs 8%, p=0.160). Survival was significantly higher in the voriconazole than in the L-AmB group (100% vs 77%, p=0.006). Adverse effects that were significantly more common in the L-AmB group than in the voriconazole group were elevated serum creatinine levels (27% vs 3%, p=0.017) and electrolyte disturbances (19% vs 0%, p=0.014). Adverse effects reported more frequently in the voriconazole group than in the L-AmB group were visual disturbances (9% vs 0%, p=0.245) and elevated hepatic enzyme levels (9% vs 8%, p>0.999). Mean drug expenditures/episode for initial empiric antifungal therapy were lower for voriconazole than for L-AmB ($1593 vs $4144, or $153 vs $380/day).

CONCLUSION

Our institution's algorithm incorporating voriconazole into the empiric management of febrile neutropenia was associated with effectiveness outcomes comparable to those observed with L-AmB as well as a lower frequency of adverse effects and overall expenditures for antifungal drugs.

Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Liposomal Amphotericin B versus Voriconazole for Empirical Treatment of Febrile Neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) has demonstrated similar efficacy to conventional amphotericin B for antifungal treatment in patients with febrile neutropenia; however, it is not without toxicities and is associated with a high acquisition cost. Despite this high cost, LAmB has been shown to have a pharmacoeconomic advantage over less expensive agents. Voriconazole is a potential alternative for empirical antifungal treatment of febrile neutropenia. The objective of this study was to assess the economic outcomes of voriconazole versus LAmB in patients with fever and neutropenia.

METHODS

A decision analytical model was developed from a hospital perspective based on a 2-year (2002-2003) review of outcomes and prescribing practices in febrile neutropenic patients at a tertiary care medical centre. Literature reports and expert opinion were used to further populate the model. Sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulation enhanced the robustness of the model through variation of all probabilities and costs that populated the model.

RESULTS

Sixty-three cases were evaluated in the retrospective review. Thirty-two were initially given voriconazole and 31 were given LAmB. Patient demographic data were similar in each group. In the base case, patients initially given voriconazole displayed a 27% reduction in overall treatment cost over patients initially given LAmB (14,950 vs 20,591 $US). Sensitivity analysis determined that the cost advantage in the voriconazole arm was maintained over a wide range of costs and probabilities. Variance in the cost of nephrotoxicity and medication cost did not significantly alter results. Monte Carlo simulation determined the voriconazole arm to be the optimal path in 65% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The decision model indicated that use of voriconazole as the preferred antifungal agent in adult haematology patients with febrile neutropenia should result in lower overall treatment costs relative to LAmB.

Factors Influencing the Magnitude and Clinical Significance of Drug Interactions Between Azole Antifungals and Select Immunosuppressants

The magnitude of drug interactions between azole antifungals and immunosuppressants is drug and patient specific and depends on the potency of the azole inhibitor involved, the resulting plasma concentrations of each drug, the drug formulation, and interpatient variability. Many factors contribute to variability in the magnitude and clinical significance of drug interactions between an immunosuppressant such as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, or sirolimus and an antifungal agent such as ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, or posaconazole. By bringing similarities and differences among these agents and their potential interactions to clinicians' attention, they can appreciate and apply these findings in a individualized patient approach rather than follow only the one-size-fits-all dosing recommendations suggested in many tertiary references. Differences in metabolism and in the inhibitory potency of cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein influence the onset, magnitude, and resolution of drug interactions and their potential effect on clinical outcomes. Important issues are the route of administration and the decision to preemptively adjust dosages versus intensive monitoring with subsequent dosage adjustments. We provide recommendations for the concomitant use of these agents, including suggestions regarding contraindicated combinations, those best avoided, and those requiring close monitoring of drug dosages and plasma concentrations.

Magnitude and duration of elevated gastric pH in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus after administration of chewable, dispersible, buffered didanosine tablets

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To test the hypothesis that gastric pH would be elevated above pH 3.0 for at least 2 hours after administration of chewable, dispersible, buffered didanosine tablets. Doses tested were 200 mg (two 100-mg tablets) and 400 mg (two 200-mg tablets). We also sought to compare these doses with regard to maximum gastric pH (pHmax), time to pHmax (TpH-max), time that gastric pH exceeds 3.0 (TpH>3), and area under the gastric pH versus time curve for pH greater than 3.0 (AUCT>pH 3).

DESIGN

Prospective, parallel-group, dose-comparison, gastric pH study.

SETTING

General Clinical Research Center, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

PATIENTS

Nineteen patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus, aged 30-62 years, and receiving long-term didanosine therapy.

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent continuous gastric pH monitoring, using the Heidelberg capsule radiotelemetric pH monitoring device. After documentation of a fasting baseline gastric pH below 3.0, patients were given 180 ml of water (control phase), and gastric pH was allowed to return to baseline. After administration of a single, oral dose of didanosine 200 mg or 400 mg with 180 ml of water, gastric pH was recorded until pH remained below 3.0 for 10 minutes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A mean pHmax of 8.6 (range 6.3-9.5) was achieved with a TpH-max of 4.1 minutes (range 1-12.0 min). Mean TpH>3 was 24.9 minutes (range 15-55 min), with an AUCT>pH 3 of 2.6 pH x min(-1) (range 1.2-6.9 pH x min(-1)). The two doses of didanosine tested did not differ significantly in mean gastric pH parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

After administration of chewable, dispersible, buffered didanosine tablets, 200 or 400 mg, the mean duration of elevated gastric pH (TpH>3) was less than 30 minutes, with a range of 15-55 minutes. Characterization of the magnitude and duration of elevated gastric pH may allow for earlier administration of other pH-sensitive drugs. The short duration of elevated gastric pH may help explain the wide variability in didanosine bioavailability observed clinically.

Incidence of Carbapenem‐Associated Allergic‐Type Reactions among Patients with versus Patients without a Reported Penicillin Allergy

This retrospective analysis sought to determine the comparative incidence of cross-reactivity associated with carbapenem antibiotic treatment among patients with versus those without penicillin allergy. We sought to determine whether the incidence of cross-reactivity is different between imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem. A total of 211 patients were treated with a carbapenem antibiotic. Included were 100 patients with and 111 patients without a documented or reported penicillin allergy. Within each group, subgroups of penicillin-allergic and penicillin-nonallergic patients were balanced equally between imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem. The incidence of patients with a reported or documented penicillin allergy experiencing an allergic-type reaction to a carbapenem was 11%, which is 5.2 times greater than the risk in patients who were reportedly not allergic to penicillin (P=.024). No difference in the occurrence of allergic-type reactions was observed between the 2 carbapenems.

Peritoneal dialysis fluid concentrations of linezolid in the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium peritonitis

OBJECTIVE

To determine linezolid concentrations in peritoneal dialysis fluid after multiple oral doses of the drug in a 46-year-old man with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium peritonitis who was undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

METHODS

After administration of oral linezolid 600 mg twice/day was started, peritoneal dialysis fluid was collected at the end of several 4- and 8-hour dwell times and submitted for analysis of linezolid concentration. Before linezolid therapy was begun, and immediately after several peritoneal dialysis exchanges, 30 ml of expended peritoneal dialysis fluid was collected in a sterile container and immediately frozen at -70 degrees C until analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Peritoneal dialysis concentrations of linezolid greater than 4 microg/ml were achieved after the first dose of linezolid and maintained after repeated doses. During the course of therapy, mean linezolid concentrations in peritoneal dialysis fluid tended to increase (mean 7.60 pg/ml, range 3.54-16.2 microg/ml). All assayed peritoneal dialysis samples demonstrated linezolid concentrations greater than 4 microg/ml at the end of 4- or 8-hour dwell times, except for one level after a missed dose on linezolid treatment day 3. Duration of dwell times did not appear to correlate with linezolid concentrations.

CONCLUSION

In this patient, linezolid 600 mg twice/day penetrated into peritoneal dialysis fluid at or above the concentrations necessary to treat common gram-positive bacteria. Linezolid therapy is likely to have a role in peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis based on its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, ease of administration, and tolerability.

Linezolid clearance during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration: a case report

OBJECTIVE

To determine the linezolid clearance and serum concentrations in a critically ill man receiving continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).

METHODS

Intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours was administered to a critically ill, 85-year-old man with anuria who was receiving CVVHDF at a dialysate flow rate of 2000 ml/hour and a mean ultrafiltrate production rate of 775 ml/hour. Samples of blood and spent dialysate and ultrafiltrate were obtained at the time of linezolid peaks and troughs, and linezolid concentrations were determined.

RESULTS

The CVVHDF yielded a mean linezolid clearance of 36.5 ml/minute and an elimination half-life of 7.5 hours. The linezolid saturation coefficient ranged from 0.77-0.81. Administration of intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours yielded suitable serum trough concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Administration of intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours maintained therapeutic serum trough concentrations in this critically ill patient receiving CVVHDF.

The effect of an antimicrobial restriction program on Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance to beta-lactams in a large teaching hospital

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare the use of beta-lactams and subsequent Pseudomonas aeruginosa sensitivity patterns before and after implementation of a clinical pharmacist-facilitated antimicrobial restriction program in August 1997.

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive data collection.

SETTING

Large university-affiliated medical center.

INTERVENTION

The study results are the accumulation of the daily intervention activities of the antimicrobial restriction program. Data on antimicrobial grams purchased/1,000 patient-days and susceptibility patterns were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS

Annual grams of ceftazidime, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and other antipseudomonal beta-lactams purchased/1,000 patient-days were compared during the 2 full calendar years before the antimicrobial restriction program (1995-1996) with the 4 full calendar years after the program was implemented (1998-2001). Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance trends for the antipseudomonal beta-lactams, ciprofloxacin, and tobramycin also were compared for the 2 years before the program (1995-1996) with the last 2 years of the program (2000-2001). A 44% reduction in ceftazidime use was documented; ostensibly, minimal changes occurred in the overall use of piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam. During the same time period, ceftazidime resistance fell from 24% to 11.8% (p<0.001), whereas piperacillin resistance fell from 32.5% to 18.5% (p<0.001). Imipenem resistance declined from 20.5% to 12.3% (p<0.001) with an 18% reduction in use. Aztreonam resistance declined from 29.5% to 16.5% (p<0.001) despite a 57% increase in use. No changes in resistance to either ciprofloxacin or tobramycin were found.

CONCLUSION

Through an antimicrobial restriction program, a dramatic reduction in ceftazidime use was achieved with judicious use of other antipseudomonal antimicrobials, which resulted in reduced resistance of P aeruginosa to other beta-lactams.