Dopamine serotonin stabilizer RP5063: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of safety and efficacy in exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

The study objectives were to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of RP5063 versus placebo. The study was conducted in adults with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. This 28-day, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind study randomized 234 subjects to RP5063 15, 30, or 50mg; aripiprazole; or placebo (3:3:3:1:2) once daily. The aripiprazole arm was included solely to show assay sensitivity and was not powered to show efficacy. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Day 28/EOT (End-of-Treatment) in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score; secondary endpoints included PANSS subscales, improvement ≥1 point on the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S), depression and cognition scales. The primary analysis of PANSS Total showed improvement by a mean (SE) of -20.23 (2.65), -15.42 (2.04), and -19.21 (2.39) in the RP5063 15, 30, and 50mg arms, versus -11.41 (3.45) in the placebo arm. The difference between treatment and placebo reached statistical significance for the 15mg (p=0.021) and 50mg (p=0.016) arms. Improvement with RP5063 was also seen for multiple secondary efficacy outcomes. Discontinuation for any reason was much lower for RP5063 (14%, 25%, 12%) versus placebo (26%) and aripiprazole (35%). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in the RP5063 groups were insomnia and agitation. There were no significant changes in body weight, electrocardiogram, or incidence of orthostatic hypotension; there was a decrease in blood glucose, lipid profiles, and prolactin levels. In conclusion, the novel dopamine serotonin stabilizer, RP5063 is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Assessment of the effects of AZD3480 on cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia

AZD3480 is a selective agonist of α4β2 central neuronal nicotinic receptors (NNRs). This study investigated its effects on cognition, relative to placebo, in 440 patients with stable schizophrenia who were taking a single atypical antipsychotic medication and who were active cigarette smokers. Mean age was 41 (range 19 to 55) years and the majority of patients (88%) had a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. Patients were randomized to one of 3 doses of AZD3480: 5 mg, 20 mg, and 35/100 mg (depending on CYP2D6 metabolic status), or to placebo. Treatment was given once daily for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in cognitive function from baseline to Week 12, as measured by IntegNeuro computerized test battery of cognitive function scores. Secondary outcome measures included assessment of functional capacity (University of California at San Diego Performance Based Skills Assessment [UPSA2]) and adaptive function (Social Functioning Scale [SFS]). AZD3480 failed to improve cognition relative to placebo in this population of patients or in subpopulations defined by disposition, metabolic status, antipsychotic treatment, age, age of illness onset, and sex. Likewise, no improvement relative to placebo was observed in either the SFS measure of adaptive functioning or the UPSA2 measure of functional capacity. AZD3480 was generally well tolerated in the population studied.

Efficacy and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate monotherapy as maintenance treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

evaluate the efficacy (time to recurrence of depressive symptoms) of once daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as maintenance monotherapy treatment to prevent relapse for major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

Time-to-event (maximum 52 weeks), double-blind, multicenter, randomized withdrawal, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine XR (50-300 mg/day) comprising four treatment phases: enrollment (up to 28 days), open-label run-in (4-8 weeks), open-label stabilization (12-18 weeks), and randomization (up to 52 weeks). Seven hundred and seventy-six patients stabilized on quetiapine XR were eligible for randomization (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score ≤12 and Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness [CGI-S] score ≤3); 391 received quetiapine XR and 385 received placebo (same dose as last open-label visit). Primary endpoint: time to recurrence of depressive event from randomization. Secondary outcomes included changes from randomization in MADRS total, CGI-S, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global, and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total scores. Adverse events were recorded throughout.

RESULTS

Risk of recurrence of depressive event was significantly (P<.001) reduced by 66% (HR=.34; 95% CI: .25, .46) in patients randomized to continue with quetiapine XR versus patients randomized to switch to placebo. During the randomized phase, quetiapine XR maintained improvements in secondary outcomes (P<.001 for all): MADRS (0.15 versus 2.03), CGI-S (-0.03 versus 0.23); PSQI global (0.06 versus 1.35), and HAM-A total score (0.20 versus 1.58), respectively. The most common AEs (>10% any group) during the randomized period were headache and insomnia.

CONCLUSIONS

Quetiapine XR maintenance therapy significantly reduced the risk of a depressive event in patients with MDD stabilized on quetiapine XR, with a safety and tolerability profile consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.

Efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in the treatment of early psychosis: a randomized, double-blind 52-week comparison

OBJECTIVE

This 52-week randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, multicenter study evaluated the overall effectiveness (as measured by treatment discontinuation rates) of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients early in the course of psychotic illness.

METHOD

Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day), quetiapine (100-800 mg/day), or risperidone (0.5-4 mg/day) administered in twice-daily doses. Statistical analyses tested for noninferiority in all-cause treatment discontinuation rates up to 52 weeks (primary outcome measure) based on a prespecified noninferiority margin of 20%.

RESULTS

A total of 400 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine (N=133), quetiapine (N=134), or risperidone (N=133). The mean modal prescribed daily doses were 11.7 mg for olanzapine, 506 mg for quetiapine, and 2.4 mg for risperidone. At week 52, all-cause treatment discontinuation rates were 68.4%, 70.9%, and 71.4% for olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone, respectively. Reductions in total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were similar for the three treatment groups, but reductions in PANSS positive subscale scores were greater in the olanzapine group (at 12 weeks and at 52 weeks or withdrawal from study) and the risperidone group (at 12 weeks). The most common elicited adverse events for olanzapine were drowsiness (53%), weight gain (51%), and insomnia (38%); for quetiapine, drowsiness (58%), increased sleep hours (42%), and weight gain (40%); and for risperidone, drowsiness (50%), menstrual irregularities in women (47%), and weight gain (41%).

CONCLUSIONS

Olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone demonstrated comparable effectiveness in early-psychosis patients, as indicated by similar rates of all-cause treatment discontinuation.

Long-term safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of quetiapine in adolescents: an open-label extension trial

Quetiapine is a novel, atypical antipsychotic agent that has been shown to provide long-term efficacy without serious adverse effects in adults. This is the first study of the extended use of quetiapine in adolescents. Five boys and 5 girls, ages 12.3 to 15.9 years, with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (n = 7) or bipolar disorder with psychotic features (n = 3) were eligible for entry into this single-site, 88-week, open-label trial. Subjects had completed a pharmacokinetic study over 23 days, during which the dosage of quetiapine was increased sequentially from 25 mg bid to a maximum of 400 mg bid (800 mg/day) (McConville et al. 2000). In the open-label extension of this trial, which followed directly after this trial, a physician's choice design allowed for flexible dose titration of quetiapine by the study physician to an optimal dose for each patient, with ending doses ranging from 300 mg/day to 800 mg/day. Concomitant medications, especially for anxiety and/or manic symptoms, were allowed as deemed necessary. Tolerability and safety were assessed using clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, measurements of vital signs, interviews for selective symptomatology, and electrocardiograms. Psychiatric measurements included the 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, and the modified Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Neurologic symptom ratings included the Simpson-Angus Scale and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale. Mean BPRS, CGI, and SANS scores improved significantly during the trial (p < 0.05). No extrapyramidal symptoms or evidence of tardive dyskinesia was seen. Clinically, there was a nonsignificant increase in mean weight and body mass index at week 64. This long-term study suggests that quetiapine is a well-tolerated antipsychotic agent that is efficacious for the treatment of symptoms of selected psychotic disorders in adolescents.

A comparison of the relative safety, efficacy, and tolerability of quetiapine and risperidone in outpatients with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: the quetiapine experience with safety and tolerability (QUEST) study

BACKGROUND

The few published direct comparative studies of the tolerability and efficacy of atypical antipsychotic agents were performed in relatively homogeneous populations that may not be typical of patients seen in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

The Quetiapine Experience with Safety and Tolerability (QUEST) study compared the relative safety, tolerability, and efficacy of quetiapine and risperidone in outpatients with a broad range of psychotic symptoms.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, 4-month, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive quetiapine or risperidone. Doses were adjusted to maximize efficacy and to minimize adverse events. Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) were assessed with an EPS checklist; adverse events were recorded. Efficacy was assessed using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D).

RESULTS

A total of 728 patients were randomized, 553 to quetiapine and 175 to risperidone. Mean prescribed doses over the study period were 253.9 mg/d quetiapine and 4.4 mg/d risperidone. At the end of 4 months, EPS declined in both treatment groups, but quetiapine-treated patients were significantly less likely to require dose adjustment or concurrent anti-EPS medication (P < 0.001). The most common adverse events in the quetiapine and risperidone groups were somnolence (31.3% and 15.4%, respectively), dry mouth (14.5% and 6.9%), and dizziness (12.7% and 6.9%). Overall, tolerance to side effects with the 2 drugs, measured by dropout rates, was comparable. At each visit, a higher percentage of quetiapine-treated patients showed improvement on the CGI scale, but there were no significant between-group differences on the PANSS. At end point, quetiapine-treated patients had significantly lower HAM-D scores (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that quetiapine is as effective as risperidone for the treatment of psychotic symptoms, is more effective for depressive symptoms, may have a more favorable EPS profile, and has comparable overall tolerability.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of zafirlukast on upper and lower respiratory responses to cat challenge

BACKGROUND

Zafirlukast, a leukotriene antagonist, has been shown to have protective effects against a variety of asthma triggers.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate zafirlukast's effects on upper and lower airway responses to cat allergen exposure with use of a well-characterized cat exposure model.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial 18 subjects with cat-induced asthma were randomly assigned to receive 1 week each of zafirlukast or placebo followed by a 1-hour cat challenge. Upper and lower respiratory symptoms were rated and spirometry and acoustic rhinometry were performed. Challenges were stopped early if the subject was too uncomfortable or had a >50% decrease in FEV(1).

RESULTS

Overall changes in FEV(1) were significantly different with zafirlukast treatment (P = .02). Significant differences in FEV(1) change were detected at 15 and 30 minutes (P = .027 and .05, respectively) but not at 45 and 60 minutes. Changes in acoustic rhinometry were also significantly different at 15 and 30 minutes (P =.05 and .0005, respectively) but not at 45 and 60 minutes. Challenge length was significantly longer with zafirlukast versus placebo after adjustment for differences in allergen exposure (P = .022). Respiratory symptom scores were significantly different (lower respiratory, P < .001; upper respiratory, P = .038) through the first 30 minutes of the challenge after adjustment for allergen exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Zafirlukast was significantly more effective than placebo in preserving pulmonary function and nasal anatomy and extending challenge length when cat-sensitive asthmatic subjects were exposed to high levels of cat allergen.