Clinical evaluation of germline polymorphisms associated with capecitabine toxicity in breast cancer: TBCRC-015

PURPOSE

Capecitabine is important in breast cancer treatment but causes diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome (HFS), affecting adherence and quality of life. We sought to identify pharmacogenomic predictors of capecitabine toxicity using a novel monitoring tool.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic breast cancer were prospectively treated with capecitabine (2000 mg/m²/day, 14 days on/7 off). Patients completed in-person toxicity questionnaires (day 1/cycle) and automated phone-in assessments (days 8, 15). Correlation of genotypes with early and overall toxicity was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were enrolled (14 institutions). Diarrhea and HFS occurred in 52% (17% grade 3) and 69% (9% grade 3), respectively. Only 29% of patients completed four cycles without dose reduction/interruption. In 39%, the highest toxicity grade was captured via phone. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with diarrhea-DPYD*5 (odds ratio [OR] 4.9; P = 0.0005), a MTHFR missense SNP (OR 3.3; P = 0.02), and a SNP upstream of MTRR (OR 3.0; P = 0.03). GWAS elucidated a novel HFS SNP (OR 3.0; P = 0.0007) near TNFSF4 (OX40L), a gene implicated in autoimmunity including autoimmune skin diseases never before implicated in HFS. Genotype-gene expression analyses of skin tissues identified rs11158568 (associated with HFS via GWAS) with expression of CHURC1, a transcriptional activator controlling fibroblast growth factor (beta = - 0.74; P = 1.46 × 10^-23), representing a previously unidentified mechanism for HFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first cancer pharmacogenomic study to use phone-in self-reporting, permitting augmented toxicity characterization. Three germline toxicity SNPs were replicated, and several novel SNPs/genes having strong functional relevance were discovered. If further validated, these markers could permit personalized capecitabine dosing.

A randomized phase I trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel with or without mifepristone for advanced breast cancer

Purpose

Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) overexpression is associated with poor prognosis ER-negative breast cancer. GR antagonism with mifepristone increases chemotherapy-induced breast cancer cell death, therefore we conducted a phase I clinical trial of mifepristone and nab-paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer.

Methods

A novel randomized phase I design was used to assess the effect of mifepristone on nab-paclitaxel pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Patients were randomized to placebo or mifepristone for the first cycle; mifepristone was given to all for subsequent cycles.

Results

Nine patients were enrolled. All were found to have a twofold or greater increase in serum cortisol after mifepristone administration, reflecting effective GR inhibition. Neutropenia occurred at both nab-paclitaxel dose levels studied (100 and 80 mg/m²), and was easily managed with dose reduction and/or growth factor administration. Pharmacokinetic data suggest an interaction between nab-paclitaxel and mifepristone in some patients. Two patients had complete responses (CR), three partial responses (PR), one stable disease (SD), and three progressive disease (PD). Immunohistochemical staining for GR found six of nine tumors were GR-positive. All six GR-positive tumors were triple-negative at the time of recurrence. Of these six patients, two had CRs, two PRs, one SD, and one PD.

Conclusions

GR appears to be a promising target in TNBC, and GR inhibition plus chemotherapy produces manageable toxicity. While neutropenia was observed in some, a nab-paclitaxel dose of 100 mg/m² plus mifepristone 300 mg was found to be tolerable, and a randomized phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel with/without mifepristone is planned in GR-positive advanced TNBC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2457-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Evaluation of a risk-adapted visit for post-treatment cancer survivors

113

Background: The Living in the Future (LIFE) Cancer Survivorship Program at NorthShore University HealthSystem provides a risk adapted visit (RAV) directed by a physician and facilitated by an oncology nurse during which an electronic medical record documented LIFE survivorship care plan (SCP) is provided and discussed. We evaluated the degree to which a RAV promotes individualized healthcare and self-management as survivors transition from active treatment to follow-up care. Methods: Patients anonymously complete a post-RAV evaluation on the day of their RAV and then another at least one year after their RAV. Results: 1,713 RAVS, the majority for breast cancer, occurred from 1/2007 to 3/2014.There are 1,615 complete “day of” post- RAV evaluative data with a median time from completion of last therapy of < 6 months. Respondents scaled statements as strongly agree/ agree/disagree/ strongly disagree. Combined strongly agree/agree ratings are: 94% felt more confident in their ability to communicate information about their cancer treatments to other members of their healthcare team; 90% felt more comfortable recognizing signs and symptoms to report to their healthcare provider; 98% had a better appreciation for potentially helpful community programs and services. Of the 488 respondents (RAV between 1/2007 and 12/2012 n=1,366) to a questionnaire at least one year after the RAV, nearly 100%/97%/93%/91%/85% found the SCP useful in at least 1/2/3/4/5 ways: to summarize medical information, to reinforce follow up care, to recognize symptoms to report, to identify lifestyle practices that promote health, and for assistance in identifying local resources for support. 72% discussed their SCP with their PCP or another healthcare provider, 97% stated they made at least one positive lifestyle change, 89% attended at least one LIFE health promotion seminar, and 80% continue to work on wellness goals. Conclusions: Participation in a LIFE RAV following oncology treatment helps survivors construct a useful understanding of their cancer experience to guide self-care behavior. Data demonstrate that benefits persist one year after the visit and support the feasibility of a nurse-led RAV to establish a SCP in post-treatment cancer survivors.

Docetaxel Combined With Trastuzumab Is an Active Regimen in HER-2 3+ Overexpressing and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Phase II Trial

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of weekly docetaxel and trastuzumab as first- or second-line therapy in women with HER-2–overexpressing metastatic breast cancer and to correlate the efficacy of trastuzumab with HER-2 status as determined by immunohistochemistry assay and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).

Patients and Methods

Twenty-six women with HER-2–positive (HercepTest [Dako Corp, Carpenteria, CA]2 to 3+) metastatic breast cancer were enrolled onto this study of trastuzumab (4 mg/kg load; 2 mg/kg/wk administered intravenously) and docetaxel (35 mg/m2/wk for 6 weeks).

Results

Using an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 50% (13 of 26 patients). Eight patients (31%) had a period of stable disease posttherapy. Among HER-2 3+ patients, the overall response rate was 63% (12 of 19 patients) compared with a 14% response rate (one of seven patients) for HER-2 2+ patients (P = .07). Patients with FISH-positive tumors experienced an overall response rate of 64%. Median time to progression was 12.4 months for the entire cohort (HER-2 3+ tumors, 12.3 months; HER-2 2+ lesions, 9.5 months) and median survival was 22.1 months. All HER-2 3+ patients were FISH-positive; the only HER-2 2+ patient responding to treatment was also FISH-positive. Grade 4 toxicities occurred in four patients; most toxicities were mild.

Conclusion

Trastuzumab plus docetaxel is an active and well-tolerated regimen in women with HER-2 3+ overexpressing or FISH-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales

Magnitude differences in scores on a measure of quality of life that correspond to differences in function or clinical course are called clinically important differences (CIDs). Anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to provide ranges of CIDs for five targeted scale scores of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire. Three samples of cancer patients were used: Sample 1 included 50 patients participating in a validation study of the FACT-An; Sample 2 included 131 patients participating in a longitudinal study of chemotherapy-induced fatigue; sample 3 included 2,402 patients enrolled in a community-based clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a treatment for anemia. Three clinical indicators (hemoglobin level; performance status; response to treatment) were used to determine anchor-based differences. One-half of the standard deviation and 1 standard error of measurement were used as distribution-based criteria. Analyses supported the following whole number estimates of a minimal CID for these five targeted scores: Fatigue Scale = 3.0; FACT-G total score = 4.0; FACT-An total score = 7.0; Trial Outcome Index-Fatigue = 5.0; and Trial Outcome Index-Anemia = 6.0. These estimates provide a basis for sample size estimation when planning for a clinical trial or other longitudinal study, when the purpose is to ensure detection of meaningful change over time. They can also be used in conjunction with more traditional clinical markers to assist investigators in determining treatment efficacy.

Pregnancy and breast cancer

Breast cancer and pregnancy are best considered as two discrete events which may occur either simultaneously or sequentially without any discernible biological interaction. There is no epidemiologic, clinical, or prognostic evidence that pregnancy, or its termination, will alter the natural history of breast cancer. Further, the existence of a pregnancy need not compromise effective breast cancer treatment, although the selection of modalities must consider fetal safety. Adjuvant radiotherapy, and thus breast conservation, is contraindicated unless it can be deferred until after completion of the pregnancy. Adjuvant chemotherapy is best delayed until after completion of the first trimester, and then, use of antimetabolites such as methotrexate and flourouracil should be avoided. Although the diagnosis of breast cancer during pregnancy may be only a biological coincidence, the emotional impact of this coincidence can be devastating on both patient and family. Informed medical care and compassionate support are both essential for women who simultaneously must confront the diametrically opposed implications and expectations of a life-giving and a life-threatening process.

DNA flow cytometry and pathologic grading as prognostic guides in axillary lymph node-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The recurrence or mortality rate of axillary lymph node-negative invasive breast cancer has been associated with the tumor S-phase fraction, which is measured by DNA flow cytometry. Because many of the studies that established this association were performed using frozen, pulverized tumor specimens, this association could not be tested for independence from the established prognostic factors of histologic and nuclear grading.

METHODS

Histologic, nuclear, and mitotic grades, DNA ploidy, and S-phase fraction (SPF) were determined from paraffin-embedded tumors obtained from 280 women with node-negative invasive ductal carcinomas using standard grading schemes and flow cytometric techniques. These variables were compared with disease-free and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in univariate and multivariate analyses of these patients.

RESULTS

Tumor diameter, SPF, histologic grade, and nuclear grade were significant predictors of disease-free survival (DFS); diameter and SPF had significant associations with CSS. Cox analysis showed histologic grade to be the only independent predictor of relapse, whereas diameter and SPF were independent predictors of mortality. The patients with low nuclear or histologic grade tumors had only a 5% risk of recurrence at 5 years. In contrast, 36% of patients in this series with medium-grade or high-grade high SPF tumors had a 30% risk of recurrence over the same interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathologic grading and flow cytometric determination of SPF appear to provide additive prognostic information for patients with early invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast.

Achieving local control for inflammatory carcinoma of the breast

A single institution, retrospective study of 28 patients with inflammatory carcinoma of the breast treated from 1984 to 1990 was performed. Patients received two to four cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CDF) and were then evaluated for mastectomy. Mastectomy was accomplished in 26 patients after CDF. In 21 patients, the breast was resectable after the initial doses of chemotherapy and modified radical mastectomy was done. Radiation therapy was given to 16 of the 21 patients after six to nine cycles of postoperative chemotherapy. The remaining five of 26 patients had a marginal response to CDF and underwent preoperative radiation therapy. Local recurrence occurred in four of five patients receiving preoperative radiation, in three of 16 receiving postoperative radiation and in one of five receiving mastectomy without radiation therapy. The overall observed five year survival rate was 18 percent, with a median of 34 months. Neither dermal lymphatic invasion nor estrogen receptor status were statistically significant variables when analyzing patients for local recurrence or survival. Despite poor long term survival results, the combination of induction CDF, mastectomy and postoperative radiation achieved local control in 81 percent of patients.

The importance of DNA flow cytometry in node-negative breast cancer

DNA flow cytometric analysis and conventional clinical factors were compared with disease outcome in 257 patients with node-negative infiltrating ductal carcinoma who had been treated between 1976 and 1983. Median follow-up was 80 months; none of the patients received adjuvant therapy. The relative prognostic importance of clinical variables, ploidy, and S-phase fraction was analyzed by Cox multivariate analysis. Ploidy was analyzable for 198 tumors and did not predict survival. Nuclear grade predicted disease-free survival for all patients. For 71 patients with diploid tumors, only high S-phase had a statistically significant association with relapse. For 127 patients with aneuploid tumors, tumor diameter predicted both disease-free survival and cancer death; histologic grade was also significant for predicting disease-free survival. In conclusion, flow cytometric determination of ploidy and S-phase fraction can provide valuable predictive information in node-negative breast cancer in addition to conventional variables.

Ploidy, proliferative activity and prognosis. DNA flow cytometry of solid tumors

Flow cytometric study has been used to measure the cellular DNA content of solid tumors for the last decade, and of paraffin-embedded tumor specimens for the last 5 years. Ploidy and proliferative activity are the two properties commonly measured by DNA content flow cytometric study. The ability to study archival, paraffin-embedded tumors has hastened an appreciation of the prognostic utility of this assay. Either abnormal ploidy or elevated proliferative activity predict a worsened disease-free or overall survival in most common adult malignancies. Both abnormalities are associated with poor outcome in locoregional breast, non-small cell lung, and colorectal cancers, and in all stages of ovarian cancer. Abnormal ploidy is also a dire prognostic indicator for cancers arising from the kidney, bladder, prostate, and endometrium. Clinical management of patients with these diseases may be aided by studying their tumors for these objective markers of biological aggressiveness.

Prognostic factors in breast cancer

A variety of tumor characteristics can provide prognostic information useful in managing the patient with primary breast cancer. Some of these characteristics are firmly established, whereas others are observer dependent or require prospective validation. No single characteristic, however, is likely to fully define which patient with primary breast cancer is destined to relapse. This clinical dilemma--recognition of the high-risk patient--is particularly important in the management of women with node-negative breast cancer. Because most women with this early stage of disease will be cured by surgery alone, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy must be limited to high-risk subsets. Tumor size and ER status are established prognostic factors. Histologic and nuclear grade may be important, but problems of interobserver variability remain. Some studies have shown that aneuploidy or a high S-phase fraction may be independent, high-risk characteristics. Flow cytometric DNA content analysis must be applied with caution, however, because the calculation of S-phase fraction has not been standardized and because the prognostic utility of this approach has not been prospectively confirmed. For now, a prudent approach might be to gather as much prognostic information about each patient's tumor as possible. Those with several of the high-risk characteristics listed in Table 2 should receive strongest consideration for adjuvant treatment. Some of these same prognostic factors, along with several others, can be used to characterize the high-risk node-positive patient. The number of involved axillary nodes is the most important established predictor. Progesterone-receptor status is associated with both disease-free and overall survival, whereas ER status is independently related only to overall survival. Histologic grade, DNA ploidy, and S-phase fraction can also be used to help define the high-risk patient. Finally, tumors that amplify or overexpress the HER-2 gene may have a higher risk of relapse, although this finding has been questioned. Management of patients with breast cancer requires an individualized approach that is based on a careful weighing of a variety of prognostic considerations. The relative importance of these factors will require further large-scale, prospective, multiparameter studies. Although results from such studies are awaited, an understanding of the clinical heterogeneity of breast cancer must be based on a multiplicity of observations, each of which characterizes, in a limited way, the biology of this disease.

Electrophoretic analysis of 248 clinical breast cancer specimens for P-glycoprotein overexpression or gene amplification

Multiple drug resistance (MDR), consisting of acquired cross resistance to anthracyclines, vinca alkyloids, and other antineoplastic antibiotics, has been described in a variety of cell lines. This MDR phenotype is associated with overexpression and sometimes amplification of a gene coding for a 170 kDa glycoprotein, termed P-glycoprotein. To understand the role of this mechanism in clinical breast cancer, 248 breast cancer specimens representing both untreated primary and refractory relapsing disease were probed for evidence of P-glycoprotein gene amplification or overexpression using Southern, Northern, or Western blot techniques. In no case was an increase in P-glycoprotein gene copy number or expression detected. Though these findings do not necessarily rule out a role for P-glycoprotein in mediating drug resistance in breast cancer, electrophoretic analysis of clinical specimens is unlikely to provide useful predictive information. More sensitive assays must be developed to overcome the difficulties inherent in analyzing heterogenous tissue samples.

Adjuvant treatment of node-negative breast cancer

About half of all breast cancer patients do not have axillary nodal involvement at the time of diagnosis, and this fraction will become even larger as more women participate in screening mammography programs. Recently completed trails of limited surgery have changed the primary management of node-negative disease for many women. Now, early results from a number of carefully controlled clinical trails suggest ways in which the approach to adjuvant treatment of this disease can be improved.

Flow cytometry, cellular DNA content, and prognosis in human malignancy

The use of flow cytometry to analyze the cellular DNA content of human malignancies has become increasingly commonplace. The relationship between abnormalities in DNA content or proliferative characteristics and prognosis is becoming clear for a variety of malignancies in part through new techniques that permit analysis of archival material. High- and low-risk groups of patients with early breast and bladder carcinomas, non-small-cell lung cancer, and colorectal, ovarian, and cervical carcinoma can be distinguished on the basis of abnormal stemline DNA content. In several hematologic and common pediatric malignancies, the prognostic relevance of DNA content flow cytometry has been similarly established. Though the interpretation of tumor cell cycle analyses is less certain, this characteristic may also be prognostically important. However, generalizations cannot be made when applying flow cytometric DNA analysis to clinical decision making. The prognostic importance of an abnormal DNA histogram for an individual patient must be assessed on the basis of the relevant data base for that particular tumor type. The current extent of this data base for various malignancies is reviewed.

Central nervous system toxicity with fludarabine

A serious delayed neurotoxicity marked by encephalopathy and cortical blindness has occurred in patients treated with fludarabine. This toxicity had only been reported in patients receiving high doses (ie, aplasia-inducing). We describe a similar subacute neurological deterioration occurring in two patients, including one who received only low doses of this agent. Neurologic vulnerability to low doses of fludarabine may be multifactorial and at present cannot be predicted. Continued caution in the use of this new antineoplastic agent is appropriate.

Prognostic implications of ploidy and proliferative activity in diffuse large cell lymphomas

Paraffin-embedded surgical biopsies from 50 patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLCL) were examined for proliferative activity and DNA aneuploidy by flow cytometry. These results were correlated with the clinical characteristics of these patients and the course of their disease. High proliferative activity, defined as less than 80% of cells in G0 or G1, was found to be the single most important pretreatment adverse prognostic factor in these patients. This relationship remained significant after correcting for poor performance status and advanced Ann Arbor stage, the other factors found to be associated with a shortened survival. DLCLs with high proliferative activity were more probable to present with extranodal involvement than those with lower proliferative activity. The mitotic count as determined by light microscopy did not correlate with flow cytometry-defined proliferative activity and may be a less accurate method for assessing this important biological characteristic in DLCL. DNA aneuploidy was detected in 62% of cases but did not appear to have any prognostic significance. Biopsies from patients who presented with lymphomatous bone marrow involvement, however, invariably demonstrated an aneuploid stemline. These results suggest that differences in proliferative activity may be an important biological basis for the variable prognosis seen in DLCL.