'All in good faith?' An ethno-historical analysis of local faith actors' involvement in the delivery of mental health interventions in northern Uganda

Faith actors have become increasingly significant in the field of global mental health, through their inclusion in the delivery of psychosocial support in humanitarian settings. This inclusion remains empirically underexplored. We explore historical and contemporary activities of local faith actors in responding to mental disquiet in northern Uganda. Given pre-existing roles, we question what it means when humanitarians draw on faith actors to deliver mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) in conflict-affected settings. We argue for a recognition of faith actors as agents operating within a therapeutic marketplace, which on occasion links suffering to social inequality and exclusion. We show, moreover, that the formal inclusion of Christian actors within MHPSS may not equate to the enforcement of rights-based values at the core of international ideas of protection.

COVID-19 vaccines, mobility, and pandemic bureaucracies: Undocumented migrants' perspectives from Italy's Alpine border

While scholars have noted the deeply unequal effects of the pandemic containment, there has been limited attempt to map the socio-political lives of vaccination policies, particularly from the perspective of undocumented persons moving at state margins. This paper explores how undocumented migrants, who were predominantly male travellers attempting to cross Italy's Alpine borders, encountered Covid-19 vaccines and contemporary legislation. Based on ethnographic observations and qualitative interviews with migrants, doctors, and activists at safehouses both on the Italian and French sides of the Alpine border, we trace how mobility centred decisions to accept or reject vaccines were significantly shaped by exclusionary border regimes. We move beyond the exceptional focus of the Covid-19 pandemic to show how centring visions of health connected to viral risk diverted attention from migrants' wider struggles to move to obtain safety. Ultimately, we argue for a recognition of how health crises are not merely unequally experienced, but may result in the reconfiguration of violent governance practices at state borders.

COVID-19 vaccination campaigns and the production of mistrust among Roma and migrant populations in Italy

Achieving high rates of COVID-19 vaccination has become central to a return to normalcy in a post-pandemic world. Accordingly, exceptional measures, such as the regulation of immunity through vaccine passports and restrictions that distinguished between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, became a feature of vaccination campaigns in certain G7 countries. Such policies stand in tension with recent supranational European Union policies that seek to build inclusion and trust through engaging minoritised groups in vaccine campaigns. To explore this tension, we present novel ethnographic data produced with migrant and Roma communities in Italy. Our evidence suggests that under restrictive measures, many within these groups initially described as ‘vaccine hesitant’ have accepted a vaccine. Yet, rather than indicating successful civic engagement, we find that vaccine acceptance was tied to deepening mistrust in science and the state. Considering the structural socioeconomic, historical and cultural elements informing people’s vaccination choices, we propose a shift in emphasis towards equitable principles of engagement.

Covid-19 Riskscapes: Viral Risk Perceptions in the African Great Lakes

In this article we explore Covid-19 riskscapes across the African Great Lakes region. Drawing on fieldwork across Uganda and Malawi, our analysis centers around how two mobile, trans-border figures - truck drivers and migrant traders - came to be understood as shifting, yet central loci of perceived viral risk. We argue that political decision-making processes, with specific reference to the influence of Covid-19 testing regimes and reported disease metrics, aggravated antecedent geographies of blame targeted at mobile "others". We find that using grounded riskscapes to examine localised renditions of risk reveals otherwise neglected forms of discriminatory discourse and practice.

COVID-19 information dissemination in Uganda: Perspectives from sub-national health workers

BACKGROUND

In many places, health workers at the sub-national level are on the frontlines of disseminating information about coronavirus (COVID-19) to communities. To ensure communities are receiving timely and accurate information, it is vital health workers are kept abreast of the most recent recommendations, and guidance.

METHODS

An electronic survey was implemented to provide insights about the dissemination and utilisation of information and evidence related to the COVID-19 pandemic by health workers engaged at sub-national levels of the Ugandan health system. The aim of this survey was to provide insights about the dissemination and utilisation of information and evidence related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic by individuals engaged at sub-national levels of the health system.

RESULTS

Mass media and public health campaigns and outreach activities were deemed the most suitable means to reach communities with COVID-19 information. Given the reported disruption to public outreach campaigns, this is a particularly important consideration for the provision of information to communities. All materials should be adapted to the local context. The need for information on homecare of COVID-19 patients was highlighted, along with the need for updated local statistics as to COVID-19 cases to be relayed for health workers at sub-national levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the sources of information used by health workers can facilitate the transfer of relevant and timely information, which in turn increases the use of such information by the Ugandan population. It is vital that these issues are continued to be monitored, and communication modes and content are actively responsive to the time- and place-specific needs of health workers and community members.

Participatory systems mapping for localised evidence and decision-making: helminth control, SSA

Background

Evidence-informed decision-making to assist public health practitioners in local-level programme implementation requires adaptive approaches to research, policy and practice. To address these needs there is focus on using participatory methods. Adopting such methods, this research asks: what are the evidence needs of local public health practitioners? How do evidence and decision-making processes interact? We reflect on the process of using Participatory Systems Mapping (PSM) and implications for localising evidence-informed decision-making.

Methods

We conducted workshops with district and national-level MoH personnel in Uganda and Malawi using PSM to elicit insights into local modes of schistosomiasis transmission and control, and group discussions on evidence needs and use in implementing control programmes. PSM maps are analysed, triangulated with thematic analysis of group discussion transcripts.

Results

Analysing PSM outputs alongside discussions on evidence provides critical methodological and policy insights with implications for localised evidence and decision-making. Further insights into the local dynamics of public health decision-making are gained by triangulating PSM with discussions on the meanings and importance of 'factors' identified. Information which is accessible and useful for local practitioner's decision-making in implementing disease control measures does not always align with academic production and dissemination of evidence, nor across levels where policy is produced or implemented.

Conclusions

An array of factors influence local decision-making with implications for global health policies and practices such as for schistosomiasis control. Processes of decision-making and evidence needs of local practitioners need to be better understood within broader context. Evidence and knowledge production on health interventions rarely feedback or respond to local implementation needs, decision-making practices and public health practitioners.

Key messages

Processes of decision-making and evidence needs of local practitioners need to be better understood within broader context. Evidence and knowledge production on health interventions rarely feedback or respond to local implementation needs, decision-making practices and public health practitioners.

Non-cyclic and developmental stage-specific expression of circadian clock proteins during murine spermatogenesis

The central circadian clock in mammals is housed in the brain and is based on cyclic transcription and translation of clock proteins. How the central clock regulates peripheral organ function is unclear. However, cyclic expression of circadian genes in peripheral tissues is well established, suggesting that these tissues have their own endogenous oscillators. Reproduction is a process influenced by circadian rhythms in many organisms, thus making the testis an attractive model for studying clock function in peripheral organs. However, results addressing cyclic expression of clock genes in the mammalian testis are inconsistent. To resolve this issue, RNA was extracted from testes of mice at various times of day. Expression of the circadian clock genes mPer1, mPer2, Bmal1, Clock, mCry1, and Npas2 was constant at all times. Immunohistochemical localization of mPER1 and CLOCK proteins revealed restricted expression only in cells at specific developmental stages of spermatogenesis. For mPER1, these stages are the spermatogonia and the condensing spermatids. In contrast, CLOCK expression was restricted to round spermatids, specifically within the developing acrosome. Expression of mPER1 and CLOCK was constant at all times of day. These results suggest that clock proteins have noncircadian functions in spermatogenesis. Noncircadian expression of clock genes was also found in the thymus, which, like the testis, is composed primarily of differentiating cells. We propose that cyclic expression of clock genes is suspended during cellular differentiation.

Wedged and free hepatic venous pressure measured with a balloon catheter

The accuracy and reliability of a balloon catheter for measuring wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) were evaluated in 82 simultaneous determinations using the balloon catheter technique and the direct measurement of portal venous pressure. These measurements showed a close positive correlation (r = 0.97) over a wide range of pressures in 12 normal and 4 cirrhotic dogs. Studies were then performed in 13 cirrhotic patients in whom the balloon catheter was introduced using the Seldinger technique. Free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) was measured with the balloon undistended. By distending the balloon to occlude the hepatic vein, the WHVP was recorded. Comparison of FHVP and WHVP with the conventional and balloon techniques revealed a close positive correlation (r = 0.89 and 0.93, respectively). The correlation was virtually perfect for the hepatic venous pressure gradient (WHVP-FHVP, r = 0.98). The balloon technique offers many advantages over the conventional approach, including the ease of achieving and demonstrating the wedged position from the femoral approach, the ability to measure the free and wedged pressure repeatedly without manipulating the catheter, and the measurement of pressure in a larger, more representative segment of the liver.