Student survey after ten years of continuous blended teaching of echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the impact of 10 years of blended echocardiography teaching.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A questionnaire was emailed to all medical doctors who graduated from the blended learning diploma in echocardiography developed by the University of Chile and taught by a team from Chile and Spain. One hundred and forty of the 210 students who graduated from the program between 2011 and 2020 completed the questionnaire: 53.57% were anaesthesiologists, and 26.42% were intensivists. More than 85% of respondents indicated that the online teaching met their expectations, and 70.2% indicated that the hands-on practice fulfilled the stated objectives. In a retrospective analysis using self-reported data, graduates reported that their use of transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography has increased from 24.29% to 40.71% and from 13.57% to 27.86%, repectively, after the programme compared to before the programme. They used echocardiography mainly in the perioperative period (56.7%) and during intensive care (32.3%), while only 11% of respondents used it in emergency care units. Nearly all (92.4%) respondents reported that the skills learned was very useful in their professional practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten years after its launch, the blended learning diploma in echocardiography was well rated by graduate specialists, and is associated with a significant increase in the use of echocardiography in the perioperative period and during intensive care. The main challenges are to establish a longer period of practice and achieve greater implantation in emergency medicine.

[Transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Experience in 26 patients]

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease. Its surgical indication is undisputed in symptomatic severe AS, however, 30% of patients are at high surgical risk or inoperable. Transcatheter Valve Implantation (TAVI) is an alternative for this group of patients.

AIM

To describe the clinical outcomes of TAVI in a group of patients treated at the Instituto Nacional del Tórax, Santiago, Chile.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective study including all patients referred for TAVI due to their high surgical risk or being inoperable. All-cause mortality, secondary stroke, permanent pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, prosthetic and periprosthetic regurgitation, Karnosfky test and Functional Capacity (FC) were assessed as endpoints.

RESULTS

We evaluated 26 patients with a mean age of 82 years (74% women) in whom 27 procedures were done. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 8.8%. Overall mortality at 30 days, one and two years was 11.1, 18.5 and 29.6% respectively. Karnofsky score increased significantly from 62.3% at baseline to 83.9; 88.6 and 88.8% at six months, one and two years, respectively. Prior to the procedure, FC was 3.1 ± 0.6, decreasing significantly to 1.2; 1.3 and 1 at six months, one and two years of follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVI is an effective alternative treatment for patients with severe symptomatic AS and high surgical risk.

Causes of ineligibility in randomized controlled trials and long-term mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term mortality of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) that are eligible versus those not eligible in randomized controlled trials (RCT), and how each exclusion criteria is associated with outcome.

METHODS

Common causes of exclusion in six published RCT on intravenous antithrombotic therapy were prospectively assessed in a cohort of 452 consecutive patients with NSTEACS that were followed for up to 3 years.

RESULTS

Forty-one percent of patients had one or more exclusion criteria establishing the ineligible group. These patients were older, more likely to have coronary risk factors, ischemic ECG changes, heart failure at admission, higher creatinine levels and a lower ejection fraction than eligible patients. There were no differences between both groups in the antithrombotic treatment received or in the performance of revascularization procedures during hospitalization or in the prescription of antiplatelet treatment and beta-blockers at discharge. Cumulative 3-year mortality rate was 25% in ineligible patients compared to 9% in eligible patients (p<0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) of mortality was of 9.1 (95% CI: 4.5-18.7) for severe renal dysfunction; 6.0 (3.3-11.4) for concomitant non-vascular diseases; 3.0 (1.6-5.5) for contraindications to anticoagulation; 2.5 (1.1-5.7) for heart failure; and 2.3 (1.1-4.6) for prior cerebrovascular disease. After adjusting for baseline differences, ineligible patients had a HR of total mortality of 1.88 (1.04-3.38), and of cardiac mortality of 2 (1.01-3.98).

CONCLUSION

Patients with NSTEACS who are ineligible in RCT have a higher risk profile and a two-fold adjusted long-term mortality than eligible patients, especially those with comorbid conditions and those with contraindications to anticoagulation.

Infección previa por Chlamydia pneumoniae y pronóstico a largo plazo en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Contradictory data exists from case-control studies and in patients with stable coronary artery disease on the association of prior exposure to Chlamydia pneumoniae and cardiovascular events. We underwent a prospective study to investigate the prognostic value of C. pneumoniae seropositivity in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

In a prospective cohort of 259 consecutive patients (194 men and 65 women), mean age 65 (10 years) with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes, we measured serum levels of IgG antibodies directed against C. pneumoniae.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 28 (25, 29) months, the incidence of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction was of 15% in seropositive patients versus 13% in seronegatives at IgG titers (1:64 (p=0.58); of 14% versus 14% at IgG titers > or = 1:128 (p=0.96); and of 14% versus 15% at IgG titers (1:256 (p=0.82). The relative risks (RR, 95% CI) of these major cardiac events adjusted for possible confounding factors were 1.11 (0.52-2.40); 1.01 (0.52-1.96); and 0.94 (0.48-1.87) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Chlamydia pneumoniae IgG seropositivity is not associated with a higher incidence of death or myocardial infarction in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

[Differences in the management and prognosis of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome according to the department of initial admission]

OBJECTIVES

To assess the influence of the department of initial admission on the hospital management and 3-month prognosis of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

The data for the 4115 patients admitted to 18 hospitals in the PEPA study were compared according to the department of initial admission.

RESULTS

Twenty-six percent of the patients were admitted to the coronary care unit, 53% to the cardiology department, 9% to the internal medicine department, and 12% were discharged from the emergency ward. The baseline risk profile was high in patients admitted to the coronary care unit and decreased progressively in patients admitted to the cardiology, internal medicine and emergency departments (P<.00001). The intensity of medical management was progressively lower in these departments, but not in parallel to their different baseline lower risk profile. Beta blockers were administered to 50%, 45%, 27% and 21% of the patients, respectively; an exercise test was performed in 34%, 44%, 35% and 12%; coronary angiography in 46%, 34%, 19% and 0%; and coronary revascularization in 22%, 12%, 9% and 0% (P<.00001). The 3-month incidence of mortality or myocardial infarction was 12.2%, 6.4%, 8.7% and 3.8%, respectively (P<.00001), differences that became nonsignificant after adjustment for risk profile on admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome admitted to the coronary care unit or cardiology department have a profile of higher risk on admission than patients admitted to the internal medicine department. Also, these patients more frequently receive pharmacological treatments and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of proven efficacy but not in a manner that parallels their different risk profile on admission. However, these differences in the intensity of in-hospital management do not seem to lead to differences in the 3-month prognosis.