Systematic literature review and testing of HER2 status in urothelial carcinoma (UC)

556

Background: Recent clinical trials suggest an emerging role for HER2-targeted therapy in locally advanced and metastatic UC (LA/mUC). The prevalence of HER2 expression and gene amplification (encoded by ERBB2) in LA/mUC has not been well defined, as testing for HER2 expression in LA/mUC is not part of current routine practice and is not standardized. We report (1) findings of a systematic literature review (SLR) of HER2 status in LA/mUC and (2) preliminary results of an ongoing evaluation of HER2 status in UC assaying HER2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH). Methods: (1) The SLR used databases PubMed and EMBASE to identify English-language studies of LA/mUC HER2 status published Jan2000 – Oct2021. We used the following definitions: HER2-positive (HER2+) was defined as IHC 3+, or IHC 2+ with HER2 gene amplification (Amp+). HER2-low was defined as IHC 2+/Amp–, or as IHC 1+. HER2-zero was defined as IHC 0. Weighted averages were calculated to estimate population prevalence. (2) Commercially sourced, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical resections of primary UC were evaluated by trained readers for HER2 protein expression using the VENTANA HER2/neu (4B5) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody IHC assay and for HER2 gene amplification using the VENTANA HER2 Dual ISH DNA Probe Cocktail that detects both ERBB2 and its residing chromosome, chromosome 17 (Chr17), using a two-color chromogenic stain. HER2 IHC staining was scored based on an established scoring algorithm for gastric cancer. HER2 gene amplification was defined by a HER2/Chr17 ratio ≥2.0. Results: (1) Of 744 records screened for the SLR, 45 studies reported HER2 status, including 10,602 patients (pts) with LA/mUC. A variety of assays and scoring guidelines were used. In the 4 studies (862 pts) reporting data applicable to our predefined criteria for HER2 status, the percentage of HER2+ ranged from 6.7% to 37.5% (weighted average, 13.1%; 95% CI, 7.3%–18.8%). (2) Of 252 UC samples evaluated, 38 were HER2+ (15.1%; 95% CI, 11.2%–20.0%), 74 were HER2-low (29.4%; 95% CI, 24.1%–35.3%), and 140 were HER2-zero (55.5%; 95% CI: 49.4%–61.6%; Table). The HER2 gene was amplified in 31 (12.3%), among them 24 (77.4%) at stage III or IV muscle-invasive UC (MIUC). Conclusions: The SLR revealed wide variability of HER2 status in LA/mUC, highlighting a lack of standardized methods for assessing and defining HER2 status. In our large study using standardized laboratory methods, 44% of UC samples were HER2+ or HER2-low, and HER2 status distribution was consistent with that reported for pts with LA/mUC. Results suggest a potentially important role for HER2-targeted therapy for UC. [Table: see text]

Time and productivity loss associated with immunotherapy infusions for the treatment of melanoma in the United States: a survey of health care professionals and patients

INTRODUCTION

A new dosing schedule for the oncology immunotherapy pembrolizumab, every 6 weeks (Q6W), has been approved by the U.S. FDA, reducing the frequency of visits to infusion centers. We quantified the time spent by oncologists, nurses, patients, and caregivers per melanoma-related immunotherapy infusion visit to evaluate its potential impact.

METHODS

Surveys were self-completed by 100 oncologists, 101 oncology nurses, and 100 patients with melanoma across the U.S. to quantify the time spent per infusion visit with pembrolizumab (Q3W or Q6W), nivolumab (Q2W or Q4W), or nivolumab+ipilimumab (nivolumab in combination: Q3W; nivolumab maintenance: Q2W or Q4W). Time measures included traveling, waiting, consultation, infusion, post-treatment observation, and caregiving. Respondents were also surveyed regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infusion treatments.

RESULTS

Responses deemed valid were provided by 89 oncologists, 93 nurses, and 100 patients. For each new [returning] patient treated with pembrolizumab, nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab, oncologists reported to spend an average of 90 [64], 87 [60] and 101 [69] minutes per infusion visit (p-value for between-group difference = 0.300 [0.627]). For first [subsequent] treatment cycles, nurses reported spending 160 [145] average minutes per visit for nivolumab+ipilimumab, versus roughly 120 [110] for the single agents (p-value for between-group difference = 0.018 [0.022]). Patients reported to spend an average of 263, 382, and 224 minutes per visit at the center for pembrolizumab (N = 47), nivolumab (n = 34), and nivolumab+ipilimumab (n = 15) respectively (p-value for between-group difference = 0.0002). Patients also reported that their unpaid (N = 20) and paid caregivers (N = 41) spent with them an average of 966 and 333 minutes, respectively, from the day before to the day after the infusion visit.

CONCLUSION

Less frequent immunotherapy infusion visits may result in substantial time savings for oncologists, nurses, patients, and caregivers.

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for melanoma brain metastases

Background

More than 60% of all stage IV melanoma patients develop brain metastases, while melanoma brain metastases (MBM) is historically difficult to treat with poor prognosis.

Objectives

To summarize clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in MBM patients.

Methods

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted, and a literature search for relevant studies was performed on November 1, 2020. Weighted average of median overall survival (OS) was calculated by treatments. The random-effects model in conducting meta-analyses was applied.

Results

A total of 41 observational studies and 12 clinical trials with our clinical outcomes of interest, and 31 observational studies addressing prognostic factors were selected. The most common treatments for MBM were immunotherapy (IO), MAP kinase inhibitor (MAPKi), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), SRS+MAPKi, and SRS+IO, with median OS from treatment start of 7.2, 8.6, 7.3, 7.3, and 14.1 months, respectively. Improved OS was observed for IO and SRS with the addition of IO and/or MAPKi, compared to no IO and SRS alone, respectively. Several prognostic factors were found to be significantly associated with OS in MBM.

Conclusion

This study summarizes pertinent information regarding clinical outcomes and the association between patient characteristics and MBM prognosis.

Resistance to anti-PD1 therapies in patients with advanced melanoma: systematic literature review and application of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce anti-PD1 resistance definitions

Nearly half of advanced melanoma patients do not achieve a clinical response with anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (PD1) therapy (i.e. primary resistance) or initially achieve a clinical response but eventually progress during or following further treatment (i.e. secondary resistance). A consensus definition for tumor resistance to anti-PD1 monotherapy was published by Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce (SITC) in 2020. A systematic literature review (SLR) of clinical trials and observational studies was conducted to characterize the proportions of advanced melanoma patients who have progressed on anti-PD1 therapies. The SLR included 55 unique studies and the SITC definition of primary resistance was applied to 37 studies that specified disease progression by best overall response. Median and range of patients with primary resistance in studies that specified first-line and second-line or higher anti-PD1 monotherapy was 35.50% (21.19-39.13%; n = 4 studies) and 41.54% (30.00-56.41%, n = 3 studies); median and range of patients with primary resistance in studies that specified first-line and second-line or higher combination therapy was 30.23% (15.79-33.33%; n = 6 studies), and 70.00% (61.10-73.33%; n = 3 studies). Primary resistance to anti-PD1 monotherapies and when in combination with ipilimumab are higher in patients receiving second-line or higher therapies, in patients with acral, mucosal, and uveal melanoma, and in patients with active brain metastases. The percentage of patients with primary resistance was generally consistent across clinical trials, with variability in resistance noted for observational studies. Limitations include applying the SITC definitions to combination therapies, where consensus definitions are not yet available. Future studies should highly consider utilizing the SITC definitions to harmonize how resistance is classified and facilitate meaningful context for clinical activity.

HER2 expression in urothelial carcinoma, a systematic literature review

Background

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a common malignancy with significant associated mortality. Recent clinical trials suggest an emerging role for HER2-targeted therapy. Testing for HER2 expression in UC is not part of current routine clinical practice. In consequence, the prevalence of HER2 expression in UC is not well defined.

Methods

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to characterize HER2 expression in both locally advanced unresectable or metastatic (LA/mUC) and earlier stage UC, classified as HER2+, HER2-low, HER2-. HER2+ was defined as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 3+ or IHC 2+ and ISH/FISH+. HER2-low was defined as an IHC score of 2+ and ISH/FISH- or IHC 1+. HER2- was defined as an IHC score of 0. Weighted averages were calculated to generate an estimate of the population prevalence.

Results

A total of 88 studies were identified, with 45, 30, and 13 studies investigating LA/mUC, earlier stage UC, and mixed stage/unspecified, respectively. The most common assays used were Dako HercepTest and Ventana Pathway anti-HER2/neu (4B5) for IHC to assess HER2 protein expression; Abbott PathVysion HER-2 DNA Probe Kit, FoundationOne CDx, and Guardant360 CDx for assessing HER2 gene amplification. The most frequently cited scoring guidelines were ASCO/CAP guidelines for breast cancer and gastric cancer, though most studies defined their own criteria for HER2 expression. Using the pre-specified definition, HER2+ prevalence ranged from 6.7% to 37.5% with a weighted average of 13.0% in LA/mUC. Only 1 study presented data that could be classified as HER2+ based on pre-specified criteria in earlier stage UC patients, and this study represented a likely outlier, at 76.0%.

Conclusion

The results from this SLR help to shed light on HER2 expression in UC, a potentially clinically relevant biomarker-driven subpopulation for emerging HER2-directed regimens. Results of this SLR illuminate the variability in how HER2+ status expression levels are being assessed and how HER2+ is defined. Consensus on standardized HER2 testing and scoring criteria is paramount to better understand the clinical relevance in patients with UC.

Real-world clinical outcomes of patients with stage IIB or IIC cutaneous melanoma treated at US community oncology clinics

Aim: To describe clinical outcomes after complete surgical resection of stage IIB and IIC melanoma. Methods: Adult patients (n = 567) with stage IIB or IIC cutaneous melanoma initially diagnosed and completely resected from 2008-2017 were identified using data from a US community-based oncology network. Results: Median patient follow-up was 38.8 months from melanoma resection to death, last visit or data cut-off (31 December 2020). For stage IIB (n = 375; 66%), Kaplan-Meier median real-world recurrence-free survival (rwRFS) was 58.6 months (95% CI, 48.6-69.5). For stage IIC (n = 192; 34%), median rwRFS was 29.9 months (24.9-45.5). Overall, 44% of patients had melanoma recurrence or died; 30% developed distant metastases. Conclusion: Melanoma recurrence was common, highlighting the need for effective adjuvant therapy for stage IIB and IIC melanoma.

Current Treatment Approaches and Global Consensus Guidelines for Brain Metastases in Melanoma

Background

Up to 60% of melanoma patients develop melanoma brain metastases (MBM), which traditionally have a poor diagnosis. Current treatment strategies include immunotherapies (IO), targeted therapies (TT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but there is considerable heterogeneity across worldwide consensus guidelines.

Objective

To summarize current treatments and compare worldwide guidelines for the treatment of MBM.

Methods

Review of global consensus treatment guidelines for MBM patients.

Results

Substantial evidence supported that concurrent IO or TT plus SRS improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Guidelines are inconsistent with regards to recommendations for surgical resection of MBM, since surgical resection of symptomatic lesions alleviates neurological symptoms but does not improve OS. Whole-brain radiation therapy is not recommended by all guidelines due to negative effects on neurocognition but can be offered in rare palliative scenarios.

Conclusion

Worldwide consensus guidelines consistently recommend up-front combination IO or TT with or without SRS for the treatment of MBM.

Treatment and overall survival among anti-PD-1-exposed advanced melanoma patients with evidence of disease progression

Background: Little is known regarding treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced melanoma who progress after anti-PD-1 exposure. Methods: The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate OS from electronic health records for patients with advanced melanoma who progressed on anti-PD-1 therapy and received subsequent therapy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize treatment. Results: A total of 304 patients who progressed after anti-PD-1 therapy received subsequent therapy: 50% immunotherapy, 36% BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors, 14% other therapies. Median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.4-8.8), with an association (p < 0.01) with best response to baseline anti-PD-1 therapy and further associations with Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1 (p < 0.001 compared with ECOG ≥2), normal LDH (p < 0.001 compared with elevated levels) and treatment with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors (p = 0.02 compared with other treatment). There was an association (p < 0.01) of survival with best response to baseline anti-PD-1 therapy. Conclusions: OS for advanced melanoma patients who progress on anti-PD-1 therapy is suboptimal, which highlights the need for further research to develop new medications and optimize treatment strategies.

315 Application of the SITC immunotherapy resistance taskforce definitions of anti-PD-1 resistance to studies evaluating patients with advanced melanoma

Background

Until the recent 2020 publication by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce, there was little consensus on defining primary and secondary resistance to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monotherapy. Our objective was to characterize the clinical outcomes reported in peer-reviewed literature when categorized according to the SITC definitions.

Methods

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (September 2015 - September 2020). Data were extracted on the proportion of patients with progressive disease (PD), and SITC criteria were applied to define resistance (table 1).

Results

Thirty six studies were included, yielding 55 patient cohorts with data on PD; 42 cohorts reported PD specifically by best overall response, while 13 cohorts provided another definition of response. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 was most commonly used (37 cohorts), followed by immune-RECIST (7 cohorts). Twenty four cohorts reporting PD also had data on length of drug exposure, 13 on duration of response, 22 on utilization of a confirmatory scan, and 1 on whether progression occurred within 12 weeks of the last dose of therapy; no studies reported on all 4 criteria. We were able to partially apply SITC criteria for primary resistance to 42 of 55 cohorts and the proportion of patients with primary resistance ranged from 25% to 81%. Only a few studies had data on secondary resistance, but none provided enough granularity to fully categorize secondary resistance by SITC.

Abstract 315 Table 1

SITC definitions of primary and secondary resistance in advanced disease

Conclusions

The majority of studies in this SLR did not report complete criteria to apply the SITC definitions; however, partial categorization of primary resistance was possible. The patient characteristics and outcomes reported varied, thus the data assessed were heterogeneous. Future studies should consider utilizing the SITC consensus definitions to harmonize how resistance is classified and facilitate meaningful context for clinical activity.

897 Infusion episode-related benefits of pembrolizumab Q6W dosing schedule for patients with melanoma treated in the adjuvant and metastatic settings in the United States (US)

Background

A new dosing schedule for pembrolizumab (400 mg every six weeks (Q6W)) received accelerated FDA approval in 2020 across all approved adult indications. The Q6W dosing schedule provides an opportunity to reduce the number of infusions required over the treatment course, thereby decreasing time and costs for health care providers, patients and their caregivers. This study quantified the potential infusion episode-related benefits of pembrolizumab Q6W regimen for the treatment of patients with melanoma in the adjuvant and metastatic settings in the US.

Methods

An Excel-based tool was developed to quantify the infusion episode-related time and cost of using pembrolizumab Q6W compared to available nivolumab dosing regimens (Q4W/Q2W) to treat patients with melanoma in the adjuvant and metastatic settings from the patient, caregiver, provider, and payer perspectives. The number of infusion visits, time and costs were estimated considering a hypothetical infusion center. Time-related inputs were based on a survey of patients, physicians and nurses; cost-related inputs were obtained from published sources. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. Additional analyses assessed the impact of using alternative regimens with different frequencies of administration.

Results

Based on the tool, pembrolizumab Q6W reduced the number of infusion visits (31%), time at the infusion center (41%) and chair time (31%) in total, over one year, versus nivolumab Q4W. Because fewer visits are needed, travel time is estimated to decrease by 31%. The infusion-related direct and indirect costs borne by patients and caregivers are projected to decrease by $1,095 and $2,272, respectively over a treatment course. For a typical US infusion center treating 169 melanoma patients per week over a 1-year period, using pembrolizumab Q6W rather than nivolumab Q4W is estimated to reduce the number of infusions by 2,729 (31% reduction) for a total of 3,802 fewer hours of infusion chair time, allowing the infusion center to increase patient capacity by up to 45% using currently available resources. Time and cost savings are more prominent when comparing with nivolumab Q2W: 5,757 fewer infusion events (66% reduction) and 8,062 less hours of chair time, which would increase the patient capacity by 2.9 times.

Conclusions

Utilizing pembrolizumab Q6W to treat patients with melanoma in the US is expected to substantially reduce the number of infusion visits and associated chair time required over the duration of treatment, reducing the time and monetary burden for patients and their caregivers. Additionally, it may also improve system capacity.

Real-world effectiveness of pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma: analysis of a French national clinicobiological database

Aim: To describe real-world pembrolizumab administration and outcomes for advanced melanoma in France. Materials & methods: Using the MelBase longitudinal database, this multicenter historical-prospective study examined treatment and outcomes of patients with nonuveal, unresectable stage III/IV melanoma initiating pembrolizumab from April 2016 to September 2017, with follow-up to September 2019. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses were conducted. Results: Of 223 patients (median age 67; 51% men), 134 (60%), 36 (16%) and 53 (24%) initiated pembrolizumab in first-, second- and third-line, respectively. Median overall survival (months) was 32.6 (95% CI: 20.3-not reached [NR]), 14.4 (8.6-NR) and 9.3 (6.4-NR), respectively. Best real-world tumor response of complete or partial response was recorded for 49, 39 and 26% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: Study results support benefits of pembrolizumab therapy for advanced melanoma.

Pembrolizumab Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Advanced Melanoma in the US Community Oncology Setting: An Updated Analysis

Favorable outcomes have been observed with pembrolizumab among patients with advanced melanoma in clinical trials; however, limited evidence exists on the long-term efficacy in the real-world setting. This was an updated, retrospective observational study of adult patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma who initiated pembrolizumab (in any line of therapy) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, in The US Oncology Network and were followed through December 31, 2019 [median follow-up: 18.2 mo (range: 0.1-63.1 mo)]. Study data were sourced from electronic health records. Patient demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were assessed descriptively. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate overall survival (OS), time to treatment discontinuation, time to next treatment, physician-assessed time to tumor progression, and physician-assessed progression-free survival (rwPFS). Independent risk factors for OS and rwPFS were identified with multivariable Cox regression models. Of the 303 study-eligible patients, 119, 131, and 53 received pembrolizumab in the first-line, second-line, and third-line or beyond setting, respectively. Median OS across the study population was 29.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 20.3-49.7] and was the longest among those who received first-line pembrolizumab [42.8 mo (95% CI: 24.8-not reached)]. Median rwPFS across the study population was 5.1 months (95% CI: 4.0-7.6) and 8.1 months (95% CI: 4.6-14.4) among those who received first-line pembrolizumab. In the multivariable analyses for OS, increased age, worsening performance status, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, brain metastases, and pembrolizumab use in later lines were significantly associated a worse prognosis.

Systematic literature review for the association of biomarkers with efficacy of anti-PD-1 inhibitors in advanced melanoma

Aim: Summarize the literature assessing biomarkers in predicting efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy for patients with high-risk unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Materials & methods: Relevant studies were identified via a systematic literature review. Results: About 334 unique biomarkers or biomarker combinations were identified from 121 citations. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was the most frequently studied biomarker, followed by C-reactive protein. Fifty-nine biomarkers were significantly associated with overall survival (OS), 51 with progression-free survival (PFS) and 44 with response. Twenty biomarkers were associated with both OS and PFS; two were associated with OS, PFS and response (MHC-II and tumor mutational burden). Conclusion: Numerous biomarkers could potentially predict the efficacy of anti-PD-1-based therapy for melanoma patients. However, confirmatory studies are needed as well as determination of implications for clinical decision-making.

Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma Patients with Lymph Node Involvement Who Have Undergone Complete Resection in Argentina

Introduction

The KEYNOTE-054 trial demonstrated that adjuvant pembrolizumab improves recurrence-free survival in completely resected stage III melanoma versus watchful waiting (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57; 98.4% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–0.74). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Argentina, where watchful waiting is still widely used among these patients despite the high risk of recurrence with surgery alone.

Methods

A four-health state model was used (recurrence-free, locoregional recurrence [LR], distant metastases [DM], death). Lifetime medical costs to payers (72.08 Argentine pesos [AR$] = 1.00 U.S. dollar [USD]) and outcomes (3% annual discount) were assessed, together with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). First and LR→DM recurrences were modeled using KEYNOTE-054 and real-world data, respectively. No benefits of adjuvant treatment were assumed post-progression. Pre-DM and post-DM mortality was based on KEYNOTE-054 and on a network meta-analysis of advanced treatments expected in each arm, respectively. Utilities were derived from KEYNOTE-054 Euro-QoL data using an Argentinian algorithm, and from the literature. Public ex-factory drug prices were used.

Results

Patients in the pembrolizumab and the watchful waiting arms accrued 8.78 and 5.83 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), 9.91 and 6.98 life-years, and costs of AR$12,698,595 (176,174 USD) and AR$11,967,717 (166,034 USD), respectively. The proportion of life-years accrued that were recurrence-free was 80.8% and 56.9% in the pembrolizumab and the watchful waiting arms, respectively. Pembrolizumab patients gained 2.94 life-years and 2.96 QALYs versus watchful waiting; the ICER per QALY was AR$247,094 (3428 USD). Recurrence rates and advanced melanoma treatments were the key drivers of the ICER. At a threshold of AR$1,445,325 (29,935 USD) per QALY, pembrolizumab had an 83.5% probability of being cost-effective versus watchful waiting.

Conclusions

Adjuvant pembrolizumab after complete resection of melanoma with node involvement is highly cost-effective relative to watchful waiting in Argentina, across disease stage subgroups and BRAF mutational status. This strongly supports its coverage and reimbursement across the entire health system.

An observational study of drug utilization and associated outcomes among adult patients diagnosed with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma treated with first-line anti-PD-1 monotherapies or BRAF/MEK inhibitors in a community-based oncology setting

Introduction

Anti‐PD‐1 monotherapies (aPD‐1) and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) changed the BRAF‐mutant advanced melanoma treatment landscape. This study aimed to improve the understanding of real‐world treatment patterns and optimal treatment sequence.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of BRAF‐mutant advanced melanoma patients who initiated 1L aPD‐1 or BRAF/MEKi in the US Oncology Network between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017, followed through 31 December 2018. Patient and treatment characteristics were assessed descriptively, with Kaplan‐Meier methods used for time‐to‐event endpoints. As the primary analysis, overall survival (OS) and physician‐assessed progression‐free survival (rwPFS) were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard regression models and propensity score matching (n = 49).

Results

A total of 224 patients were included (median age 61 years, 62.9% male, 89.7% white): 36.2% received aPD‐1 and 63.8% BRAF/MEKi. Median OS and rwPFS were longer among aPD‐1 vs BRAF/MEKi patients (OS: not reached vs 13.9 months, log‐rank P = .0169; rwPFS: 7.6 vs 6.5 months, log‐rank P = .0144). Receipt of aPD‐1 was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.602 vs BRAF/MEKi [95%CI 0.382‐0.949]; P = .0287). Among patients without an event within 6 months of 1L initiation, receipt of aPD‐1 was associated with a decreased risk of progression or death from 6 months onwards (HR = 0.228 [95%CI 0.106‐0.493]; P = .0002). This association was not observed among patients within 6 months of 1L initiation (HR = 1.146; 95% CI 0.755‐1.738). Results from the propensity score‐matched pairs were consistent with these trends.

Conclusion

These results suggest a clinical benefit of 1L aPD‐1 compared to BRAF/MEKi after 6 months of treatment for BRAF‐mutant advanced melanoma. Future research should explore factors associated with early progression and their relationship with clinical outcomes.

Outcomes of retreatment with anti-PD-1 monotherapy after response to first course in patients with cutaneous melanoma

Aim: To determine outcomes of retreatment with anti-PD-1 monotherapy for melanoma. Materials & methods: This retrospective study included adults with unresectable cutaneous melanoma who achieved stable disease (SD) or better after anti-PD-1 monotherapy and were retreated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy after ≥90-day gap. We determined overall survival and real-world tumor response. Results: For 21 eligible patients, from retreatment initiation, median follow-up was 14.4 months (range, 2.6-34.5); median overall survival was 30.0 months (95% CI: 14.4-not reached); 1-year survival was 100% (95% CI: 100-100%); 2-year survival was 83% (48-96%). Of 16 patients with recorded best real-world tumor response, ten (63%) responded (complete/partial response); three achieved SD; three had progressive disease. Conclusion: Patients with advanced melanoma achieving SD/better after first-course anti-PD-1 monotherapy may benefit from retreatment.

Epidemiology and survival outcomes in stages II and III cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review

Aim

Management of cutaneous melanoma (CM) is continually evolving with adjuvant treatment of earlier stage disease. The aim of this review was to identify published epidemiological data for stages II-III CM.

Materials & methods

Systematic searches of Medline and Embase were conducted to identify literature reporting country/region-specific incidence, prevalence, survival or mortality outcomes in stage II and/or III CM. Screening was carried out by two independent reviewers.

Results & conclusion

Of 41 publications, 14 described incidence outcomes (incidence rates per stage were only reported for US and Swedish studies), 33 reported survival or mortality outcomes and none reported prevalence data. This review summarizes relevant data from published literature and highlights an overall paucity of epidemiological data in stages II and III CM.

Hospitalization and emergency department utilization in patients with advanced melanoma receiving pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab plus nivolumab in US academic centers

Background: Both pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) and ipilimumab + nivolumab (IPI + NIVO) are FDA-approved immunotherapy regimens for advanced melanoma (AM). Each regimen has different toxicity profiles potentially impacting healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This study compared real-world hospitalization and emergency department (ED) utilization within 12 months of therapy initiation of each regimen.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in AM patients ≥18 years old initiating PEMBRO or IPI + NIVO between January 1, 2016-December 30, 2017. Patients were identified from 12 US-based academic and satellite centers. All-cause hospitalization ED visits were identified. These events were used to calculate rates per 1,000 patient months. Utilization between groups was compared using multivariate logistic regression.Results: In total, 400 patients were included (200 PEMBRO, 200 IPI + NIVO). PEMBRO vs IPI + NIVO patients had poorer Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status, 29% 2-4, vs 12% (p < .001); more diabetes, 21% vs 13% (p = .045); were more often PD-L1 expression positive, 77% vs 63% (p = .011); and less likely BRAF mutant, 35% vs 50% (p = .003). The proportion with more than one hospitalization over 12 months was 17% PEMBRO vs 24% IPI + NIVO. Less than 2% had more than one admission and none had more than two. Unadjusted mean (SD) hospitalizations per 1,000 patient-months were 16 (37) and 20 (38), PEMBRO and IPI + NIVO, respectively. Adjusted odds ratio for hospitalization was 0.6 (95% CI = 0.3-0.9; p = .027) for PEMBRO vs IPI + NIVO. ED visits occurred in 18% vs 21%, PEMBRO and IPI + NIVO, respectively, 0.7 (p = .186).Conclusions: PEMBRO patients had a significantly lower probability of hospitalization through 12 months vs IPI + NIVO. The probability of ED visits did not differ.

An indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy of pembrolizumab versus competing regimens for the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma

Objective: To determine the efficacy of pembrolizumab relative to other treatments used in stage III melanoma by conducting a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods: A SLR was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating approved adjuvant treatments including interferon-containing regimens, BRAF-inhibitors, and PD-L1 inhibitors in stage III melanoma patients. Relative treatment effects for recurrence-free survival (RFS) were synthesized with Bayesian NMA models that allowed for hazard ratios (HRs) to vary over time.

Results: Included studies formed a connected network of evidence composed of eight trials. In high-risk stage III patients, the HR for pembrolizumab vs observation decreased significantly over time with the superiority of pembrolizumab over observation becoming statistically meaningful before 3 months. By 9 months, the HR for pembrolizumab vs observation was statistically significantly lower than the HR for most other treatments vs observation, with the exception of ipilimumab and biochemotherapy due to overlapping 95% credible intervals. In BRAF + patients, pembrolizumab was statistically significantly better than observation after 3 months. The HR for both BRAF-inhibitors vs observation increased significantly over time and pembrolizumab was statistically superior to both BRAF-inhibitors after 15 months.

Conclusions: Pembrolizumab results in statistically significantly improved RFS compared to all competing regimens after 9 months, except ipilimumab and biochemotherapy, for the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma. However, point estimate HRs vs observation for pembrolizumab are much lower than those for ipilimumab. In BRAF + patients, the advantage of pembrolizumab versus competing interventions increases over time with respect to RFS.

Anaesthesia and intensive care management of face transplantation

The face-grafting techniques are innovative and highly complex, requiring well-defined organization of all the teams involved. Subsequent to the first report in France in 2005, there have been 17 facial allograft transplantations performed worldwide. We describe anaesthesia and postoperative management, and the problems encountered, during the course of seven facial composite tissue grafts performed between 2007 and 2011 in our hospital. The reasons for transplantation were ballistic trauma in four patients, extensive neurofibromatosis in two patients, and severe burns in one patient. Anaesthesia for this long procedure involves advanced planning for airway management, vascular access, technique of anaesthesia, and fluid management. Preparation and grafting phases were highly haemorrhagic (>one blood volume), requiring massive transfusion. Median (range) volumes given for packed red cell (PRC) and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) were 64.2 ml kg(-1) (35.5-227.5) and 46.2 ml kg(-1) (6.3-173.7), respectively. Blood loss quantification was difficult because of diffuse bleeding to the drapes. The management of patients with neurofibromatosis or burns involving the whole face was more difficult and haemorrhagic than the patients with lower face transplantation. Average surgical duration was 19.1 h (15-28 h). Postoperative severe graft oedema was present in most patients. Most patients encountered complications in ICU, such as renal insufficiency, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and jugular thrombosis. Opportunistic bacterial infections were a feature during the postoperative period in these highly immunosuppressed patients.

[The law number 2005-370 of April 22, 2005 concerning the patients' rights at the end of life: a case of polytrauma]

The law number 2005-370 of April 22, 2005 concerning the patients' rights at the end of life imposes from now the refusal of futility of care, a shared decision-making in unconscious patients and the duty of a palliative strategy. We describe a case of polytrauma, for which the shared decision-making process led to a palliative strategy after initial aggressive life-support treatments. This case underlines the need for a two-step model of decision-making process, which distinguishes between goals of care and withdrawal or withholding of life support. It suggests that implementation of written procedures could improve the quality of management at the end of life and traceability of decisions.

Comparison of two induction regimens using or not using muscle relaxant: impact on postoperative upper airway discomfort

BACKGROUND

Muscle relaxants facilitate tracheal intubation, but they are often not used for short peripheral surgical procedures. The consequences of this practice on the upper airway are still a matter of controversy. We therefore compared the incidence of post-intubation symptoms in a randomized study comparing patients intubated with or without the use of a muscle relaxant.

METHODS

A total of 300 adult patients requiring tracheal intubation for scheduled peripheral surgery were randomly assigned in a double-blind study to an anaesthetic protocol that either included or did not include a muscle relaxant (rocuronium). The primary end-point was the rate of post-intubation symptoms 2 and 24 h after extubation. The secondary end-points were the intubation conditions score (Copenhagen Consensus Conference), the rate of difficult intubations (Intubation Difficulty Scale), and the incidence of adverse haemodynamic events.

RESULTS

Post-intubation symptoms were more frequent in patients intubated without the use of a muscle relaxant, whether 2 h (57% vs 43% of patients; P < 0.05) or 24 h (38% vs 26% of patients; P < 0.05) after extubation. Intubation conditions were better when the muscle relaxant was used. In patients intubated without a muscle relaxant, difficult intubation was more common (12% vs 1%; P < 0.05), as were arterial hypotension or bradycardia requiring treatment (12% vs 3% of patients; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a muscle relaxant for tracheal intubation diminishes the incidence of adverse postoperative upper airway symptoms, results in better tracheal intubation conditions, and reduces the rate of adverse haemodynamic events.

Inhibition of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase by oxysterols in rat astrocyte primary cultures and C6 glioma cell lines

We previously demonstrated that oxysterols inhibit the growth of experimental glioblastoma induced in the rat brain cortex. Mechanism of action of these compounds remains obscure. In this study, we investigated the effect of 7beta-hydroxycholesterol (7beta-OHCH) and 7ketocholesterol (7k-CH) on the growth and MAP kinase activity in three in vitro biological models: rat astrocyte primary cultures, primary cultures treated by dibutyryl-cAMP (reactive cells), and the C6 glioma cell line. The oxysterols are not lethal to primary astrocytes, even if MAP kinase activity is decreased, particularly when cells were treated with 7k-CH. Both oxysterols are toxic to reactive astrocytes, and as compared with untreated primary cultures, they amplified the MAP kinase activity decrease. However, the mechanism of action of oxysterols on reactive astrocytes seems not to be linked to the MAP kinase pathway. In highly proliferating C6 cell lines, only 7beta-OHCH has an antiproliferative effect and is cytotoxic. The inhibition of MAP kinase activity is a function of 7beta-OHCH concentration. PD098059, a MAP kinase pathway inhibitor, has only a time-limited antiproliferative effect on C6 cell growth. We conclude that in C6 cells, the MAP kinase activity decrease is correlated with the toxic effect of 7beta-OHCH and occurs at first stages of 7beta-OHCH action.

Possible involvement of cholinergic and glycinergic amacrine cells in the inhibition exerted by the ON retinal channel on the OFF retinal channel

In the frog retina, the inhibition exerted by the ON channel on the OFF channel was evidenced by the increase in transient ganglion cell OFF responses, when the ON channel was blocked by 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate (APB). Intraocular administration of the neurotoxic choline analog ethylcholine mustard arizidinium ion (ECMA) also provoked an increase in the number of spikes of transient ganglion cell OFF responses, without suppressing the ON responses. APB, when administrated after ECMA, abolished the ON responses, but did not modify the OFF responses already increased by ECMA. Neurons located in the inner part of the inner nuclear layer were histologically altered by the toxin, and choline acetyltransferase activity was significantly depressed in ECMA-treated retinas. A double immunostaining experiment showed that amacrine cells containing glycine bear muscarinic binding sites. These results confirm the participation of cholinergic neurons in the inhibition exerted by the ON retinal channel on the OFF retinal channel, and suggest the involvement of a cholinergic/glycinergic loop of amacrine cells in this mechanism.