No increased mortality from donor or recipient hepatitis B- and/or hepatitis C-positive serostatus after related-donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Limited data exist on allogeneic transplant outcomes in recipients receiving hematopoietic cells from donors with prior or current hepatitis B (HBV) or C virus (HCV) infection (seropositive donors), or for recipients with prior or current HBV or HCV infection (seropositive recipients). Transplant outcomes are reported for 416 recipients from 121 centers, who received a human leukocyte antigen-identical related-donor allogeneic transplant for hematologic malignancies between 1995 and 2003. Of these, 33 seronegative recipients received grafts from seropositive donors and 128 recipients were seropositive. The remaining 256 patients served as controls. With comparable median follow-up (cases, 5.9 years; controls, 6.7 years), the incidence of treatment-related mortality, survival, graft-versus-host disease, and hepatic toxicity, appears similar in all cohorts. The frequencies of hepatic toxicities as well as causes of death between cases and controls were similar. Prior exposure to HBV or HCV in either the donor or the recipient should not be considered an absolute contraindication to transplant.

Leukemia relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: how does chronic graft-versus-host disease influence the pattern and onset of relapse?

We describe a pattern of relapse in 601 patients who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant at our institution for acute or chronic leukemia and myelodysplasia over a period of 18 years. We show a correlation between chronic graft-versus-host disease and extramedullary relapse, suggesting that the expected graft versus leukemia effect in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease may preferentially maintain marrow remission without preventing relapse in extramedullary sites.

Second allogeneic bone marrow transplantation after myeloablative conditioning analysis of 43 cases from single institution

Between March 1984 and December 1999, a total of 43 second related allogeneic BMT procedures after myeloablative conditioning were carried out in our institution, 37 following allogeneic, and 6 following autologous BMT. Thirty one patients were males (72%). At 1st BMT (BMT1), median age was 11.5 years (range, 0.16-45 years). BMT1 was carried out for the diagnosis of AML in 13 patients (30%), SAA in nine (21%), ALL in six (14%), CML in six (14%), immunodeficiency in three (7%), NHL in two, beta-thal in two, HD in one, Red cell aplasia in one. HLA matching status for allogeneic BMT1 was full match in 33, one antigen mismatch in two and haplo identical in two patients. Median age at the 2nd BMT (BMT2) was 14 years (range, 0.41-46.7 years). Indications for BMT2 were recurrent hematologic neoplasm in 23 patients (53%), primary graft failure in 12 (28%) and late graft failure in 8 (19%). Median time from BMT1 to recurrence of hematologic neoplasm or late graft failure was 10 months (range, 2.5- 88 months). Median BMT1 to BMT2 interval was 13 months (range, 1-107 months). For BMT2, the same donor was used in 29 patients, while 14 patients had alternate related donor (12 full match, 1-one Ag mismatch, 1 haplo identical). A different conditioning regimen was used in the majority of the patients (39, 91%). Radiation containing conditioning regimen were used mostly for patients previously conditioned with chemotherapy only for BMT1 and chemotherapy conditioning +/- ATG for those who received radiation containing conditioning at BMT1. Bone marrow was the stem cell source for all patients at BMT2 and all except three autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation patient at BMT1. Significant organ toxicity leading to procedure related death in 13 patients (30%) was observed after BMT2. At a median follow up of 36 months after BMT2, 22 patients (51%) are alive (20 free of disease, 2 with recurrent disease) with overall median survival of 47.5 (SD +/- 9) months. Univariate analysis of relevant clinical factors identified the following variables as the only statistically significant favorable prognostic factors for overall survival: BMT1-BMT2 interval of > or = 6 months (P=0.0007) and age at BMT2 < or = 10 years (P=0.041). The nature of underlying disease (neoplastic or non-neoplastic) was not statistically significant (P=0.23). There was no statistically significant difference in survival outcome of BMT2 using same donor vs. alternate related donor (P=0.51). Due to the relatively limited sample size, multivariate analysis was not attempted. This single institution study suggests that second allogeneic BMT after myeloblative conditioning has an acceptable treatment related morbidity/mortality and favorable outcome if performed at age < or = 10 years and with an interval of > or = 6 months after the first BMT. Additionally same donor can successfully be used for the second transplant with similar survival outcome to alternate donor.

The spectrum of Fusarium infection in immunocompromised patients with haematological malignancies and in non-immunocompromised patients: a single institution experience over 10 years

Fusarium is a newly emerging fungal pathogen associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the immunocompromised host. We have reviewed our hospital's experience with Fusarium between 1985 and 1995. Fusarium species were isolated from 22 specimens, representing 11 patients. Cases were not clustered by time period. The median age of the patients was 36.5 years (range 17-69 years). The sources of the organism were 12 skin lesions from eight patients, seven blood cultures from two patients and one specimen each from a Hickman catheter tip, nail clippings and a bronchoalveolar lavage. Seven of the patients had chemotherapy-induced neutropenia when the Fusarium was isolated. Five of them developed invasive fusarosis during acute leukaemia induction treatment. They remained neutropenic, and none survived. The other two patients recovered from neutropenia and were treated successfully for this infection. The remaining four patients were not neutropenic or immunocompromised. Three grew Fusarium from skin or nail clippings and one from bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL). There was no evidence of invasive disease in any of the four. None of them received antifungal therapy, and they were all alive at last follow-up. We conclude that Fusarium is a newly emerging infection in neutropenic patients. A high index of suspicion, especially for skin lesions, will help in early diagnosis before systemic and visceral dissemination. Excision of the initial focus of infection and antifungal therapy, aided by speedy neutrophil recovery, are likely to protect patients threatened with these fatal infections. Fusarium isolated from non-neutropenic, non-immunosuppressed patients is not significant and does not merit systemic antifungal treatment.