A comparison of ex vivo expanded DCs derived from cord blood and mobilized adult peripheral blood plastic-adherent mononuclear cells: decreased alloreactivity of cord blood DCs.
Cytotherapy 2004;
5:349-61. [PMID:
14578097 DOI:
10.1080/14653240310003017]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Cord blood (CB) has been used as an alternative source of transplantable allogeneic stem cells for a variety of malignant and non-malignant diseases. However, we have demonstrated delayed recovery of T- and B-cell function, and T-cell subsets post unrelated CB transplantation (UCBT), and deficiencies of CB mononuclear cells (MNC) in producing cytokines, including G-CSF, GM-CSF, M-CSF, IL-12, and IL-15. In this study we have investigated the ex vivo generation of DC from CB versus mobilized adult peripheral blood (APB) for later use as adoptive cellular immunotherapy.
METHODS
CB and APB-adherent MNC were cultured in serum-free media with GM-CSF IL-4, FLT-3 ligand, tumor growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) for 7 days. Morphology, phenotype, immunohistochemistry, clonogenic activity, and alloreactivity in MLR were evaluated.
RESULTS
CB and APB monocyte-derived ex vivo expanded DC expressed similar DC markers CD83 (31.27+ 11.7% versus 34.0+ 5.2%, CB versus APB), CD1a (23.4+ 4.2% versus 27.6+ 6.3%), and CD80 (21.97+ 12.01% versus 27.7+ 5.95). Immunohistochemistry showed that cells with DC morphology expressed CDla but not CD14. Neither FLT-3 ligand nor TGF-fl enhanced DC expansion. Addition of 10% autologous plasma to CB cultures promoted greater cell survival and a 150% increase in CDla + /CD80+ cell recovery. CB DC were 62% as effective stimulators of adult allogeneic T-cels as APB DC (p < .05) in allogeneic MLR.
DISCUSSION
While phenotypically similar, CB and APB DC have differential potency in allogeneic MLR, which may account for the difference in GvHD and infection incidence and severity between UCBT and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and may require a different approach for adoptive cellular immunotherapy. The mechanism(s) associated with these differences require further elucidation.
Collapse