1
|
Mojadadi MS, Javadinia SA, Attarian F, Samami E, Sobhani M. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG following injection of the third dose vaccine: A systematic review with meta-analysis of heterologous versus homologous vaccination. Front Public Health 2023; 10:960598. [PMID: 36711369 PMCID: PMC9878157 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.960598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The mass vaccination is a key strategy to prevent and control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Today, several different types of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been developed worldwide. These vaccines are usually administered in a two-dose schedule, and the third dose is currently being administered in most countries. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the immunogenicity of heterologous vs. homologous vaccination after administration of the third dose of COVID-19 vaccines. Methods Electronic databases and websites including Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google scholar were searched for relevant randomized clinical trial (RCT) studies. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of three RCTs were included in the study. These RCTs were included 2,613 healthy adults (18 years or older and without a history of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19) with 15 heterologous and five homologous prime-boost vaccination regimens. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike IgG levels at day 28 after administration of the third dose, were compared between the heterologous and homologous regimens. Results The highest antibody responses had been reported for the homologous vaccination regimen of m1273/m1273/m1273 (Moderna), followed by the heterologous regimen of BNT/BNT/m1273. In addition, the immunogenicity of viral vector and inactivated vaccines was remarkably enhanced when they had been boosted by a heterologous vaccine, especially mRNA vaccines. Conclusion This systematic review suggests that mRNA vaccines in a homologous regimen induce strong antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 compared to other vaccine platforms. In contrast, viral vector and inactivated vaccines show a satisfactory immunogenicity in a heterologous regimen, especially in combination with mRNA vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad-Shafi Mojadadi
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran,Leishmaniasis Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Seyed Alireza Javadinia
- Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Attarian
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran,*Correspondence: Fahimeh Attarian ✉
| | - Elham Samami
- University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, United States,College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Mona Sobhani
- Student Research Committee, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fazilat-Panah D, Fallah Tafti H, Rajabzadeh Y, Fatemi MA, Ahmadi N, Jahansouz D, Tabasi M, Javadinia SA, Joudi M, Harati H, Attarian F, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 in 1290 New Cancer Patients: Single-center, Prospective Cohort Study from Iran. Cancer Invest 2022; 40:505-515. [PMID: 35521692 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2022.2075376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in a large cohort of new cancer patients referred to an oncology clinic in the north of Iran. METHODS During the 20-months COVID-19 pandemic, new cancer patients were followed-up. Demographic, pathologic, and clinical variables were collected for each patient. COVID-19 was confirmed based on a positive polymerase chain reaction test. Analyses were performed using the STATA version 14.0 at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS In this study, 1294 new cancer patients were followed for 24 months (mean age: 58.7 years [range 10 to 95]). During the study period, COVID-19 was diagnosed in 9.4% of the patients with hospitalization rate of 3.4%, an ICU admission rate of 0.7%, and COVID-19 mortality rate of 4.9%. Hematological malignancies (ORU= 2.6, CI95% 1.28- 5.34), receiving palliative treatments (ORA=3.03, CI95% 1.6-5.45) and receiving radiotherapy (ORA=2.07, 1.17-3.65) were the most common predictive factors of COVID infection in cancer patients. Also, the COVID mortality was higher in brain cancer patients (P = 0.07), metastatic disease (P = 0.01) and patients receiving palliative treatments (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION In patients suffering from cancer, COVID-19 infection can be predicted by cancer type, palliative care, and radiotherapy in cancer patients. Furthermore, brain cancers, metastasis, and palliative care were all associated with COVID-19 related mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hamid Fallah Tafti
- Resident of radiation oncology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Yavar Rajabzadeh
- Babolsar Rajaee Cancer Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | | | - Nahid Ahmadi
- Cancer Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Davoud Jahansouz
- Babolsar Rajaee Cancer Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Mohsen Tabasi
- Department of Molecular Biology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Pasteur Ave., Tehran, 13164, Iran
| | - Seyed Alireza Javadinia
- Vasei Clinical Research Development Unit, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Maryam Joudi
- Assistant professor of Allergy and clinical immunology, Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran
| | - Hadi Harati
- Assistant professor of Nurology, Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Attarian
- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Javadinia SA, Alizadeh K, Mojadadi MS, Nikbakht F, Dashti F, Joudi M, Harati H, Welsh JS, Farahmand SA, Attarian F. COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Malignancy; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:860238. [PMID: 35586627 PMCID: PMC9108702 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.860238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Data on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with malignancy are immature. In this paper, we assessed the literature involving the use of COVID-19 vaccines in cancer patients and reported the seroconversion rates as the main outcome and severity of COVID-19 infection and side effects following COVID-19 vaccination as the secondary outcomes. Methods A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed. Searches were conducted in electronic websites, databases, and journals, including Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from January 01, 2019, to November 30, 2021. Studies reporting data on the safety and efficacy of COVID vaccine in cancer patients using any human samples were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA scale in the included studies. Results A total of 724 articles were identified from databases, out of which 201 articles were duplicates and were discarded. Subsequently, 454 articles were excluded through initial screening of the titles and abstracts. Moreover, 41 studies did not report the precise seroconversion rate either based on the type of cancer or after injection of a second dose of COVID vaccine. Finally, 28 articles met all the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. The overall seroconversion rates after receiving a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine, based on type of cancer were 88% (95% CI, 81%-92%) and 70% (95% CI, 60%-79%) in patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, respectively. Conclusion Overall, we conclude that vaccination against COVID-19 in patients with active malignancies using activated and inactivated vaccines is a safe and tolerable procedure that is also accompanied by a high efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Alireza Javadinia
- Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Kimia Alizadeh
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine & Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States
| | | | - Fateme Nikbakht
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Farzaneh Dashti
- Faculty of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Science, Birjand, Iran
| | - Maryam Joudi
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran
| | - Hadi Harati
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran
| | - James S. Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Edward Hines Jr Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital and Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Seyed Amir Farahmand
- Student Research Committee, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Attarian
- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Attarian F, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Fanipakdel A, Javadinia SA, Porouhan P, PeyroShabany B, Fazilat-Panah D. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Number of Adjuvant Temozolomide Cycles in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:779491. [PMID: 34900732 PMCID: PMC8651479 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.779491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In newly diagnosed glioblastoma, radiation with concurrent and adjuvant (six cycles) temozolomide (TMZ) is the established standard of postsurgical care. However, the benefit of extending adjuvant TMZ therapy beyond six cycles has remained unknown. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase up to October 1, 2021. The search keywords were “glioblastoma,” “adjuvant chemotherapy,” and their synonyms. The data of randomized clinical trials were extracted and included in this meta-analysis if they had reported patients’ median overall survival (OS) or median progression-free survival (PFS). The standard and extended chemotherapy regimens were considered as adjuvant TMZ up to six cycles and beyond six cycles (up to a total of 12 cycles), respectively. The median OS and median PFS were pooled and compared. Results Four studies consisting of 882 patients (461 patients for the standard chemotherapy group and 421 patients for the extended chemotherapy group) were included in this meta-analysis. The extended TMZ regimen was associated with a nonsignificant improvement in PFS [12.0 months (95% CI 9.0 to 15.0) vs. 10.0 months (95% CI 7.0 to 12.0), P = 0.27] without corresponding improvement in OS [23.0 months (95% CI 19.0 to 27.0) and 24.0 months (95% CI 20.0 to 28.0), P = 0.73]. Conclusions In newly diagnosed glioblastoma, continuing adjuvant TMZ beyond six cycles did not shown an increase neither in PFS nor OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahimeh Attarian
- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran
| | | | - Azar Fanipakdel
- Cancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Seyed Alireza Javadinia
- Vasei Clinical Research Development Unit, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Pejman Porouhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Babak PeyroShabany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE COVID-19 has been introduced by the World Health Organization as a health emergency worldwide. Up to 9% of the patients with COVID-19 may be readmitted by 2 months after discharge. This study aimed to estimate the readmission rate and identify main risk factors for readmission in these patients. In this prospective study, 416 discharged COVID patients followed up with a minimum 1 month and the readmission rate was recorded. Evaluated characteristics included time of readmission, age and sex, main symptoms of disease, result of computed tomography scan, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test and treatment modalities. RESULTS Regarding readmission, 51 patients of 416 discharged patients, was readmitted during the study period. The rate of readmission for 30 and 60 days after discharge was 7.6% and 8.1%, respectively. The median age of the readmitted patients was 67 years (IQR: 53-78). About 65% of readmitted patients had underlying disease. The most significant factor in readmission rate was related to the site of lung involvement (OR > 4). Age over 60 years, underlying disease especially diabetes (OR = 3.43), high creatinine level (≥ to 1.2 mg/dl) (OR = 2.15) were the most important predictors of readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Nematshahi
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Sabzevar University of Medical Science, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Davood Soroosh
- Clinical Research Development Unit, Hospital Research Development Committee, Vasei Educational Hospital, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, TohidShar BLV, 9617747431 Sabzevar, Razavi Khorasan Iran
| | - Mahboubeh Neamatshahi
- Community Medicine Department, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Attarian
- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Torbat Heydariyeh of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh
, Iran
| | - Faeze Rahimi
- Clinical Research Development Unit, Hospital Research Development Committee, Vasei Educational Hospital, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, TohidShar BLV, 9617747431 Sabzevar, Razavi Khorasan Iran
| |
Collapse
|