The Association of Incidental Radiation Dose to the Heart Base with Overall Survival and Cardiac Events after Curative-intent Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from the NI-HEART Study

AIMS

Cardiac disease is a dose-limiting toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy. The dose to the heart base has been associated with poor survival in multiple institutional and clinical trial datasets using unsupervised, voxel-based analysis. Validation has not been undertaken in a cohort with individual patient delineations of the cardiac base or for the endpoint of cardiac events. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of heart base radiation dose with overall survival and the risk of cardiac events with individual heart base contours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed for baseline patient, tumour and cardiac details and both cancer and cardiac outcomes as part of the NI-HEART study. Three cardiologists verified cardiac events including atrial fibrillation, heart failure and acute coronary syndrome. Cardiac substructure delineations were completed using a validated deep learning-based autosegmentation tool and a composite cardiac base structure was generated. Cox and Fine-Gray regressions were undertaken for the risk of death and cardiac events.

RESULTS

Of 478 eligible patients, most received 55 Gy/20 fractions (96%) without chemotherapy (58%), planned with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (71%). Pre-existing cardiovascular morbidity was common (78% two or more risk factors, 46% one or more established disease). The median follow-up was 21.1 months. Dichotomised at the median, a higher heart base Dmax was associated with poorer survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (20.2 months versus 28.3 months; hazard ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.75, P = 0.0017) and statistical significance was retained in multivariate analyses. Furthermore, heart base Dmax was associated with pooled cardiac events in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.03-2.97, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart base Dmax was associated with the rate of death and cardiac events after adjusting for patient, tumour and cardiovascular factors in the NI-HEART study. This validates the findings from previous unsupervised analytical approaches. The heart base could be considered as a potential sub-organ at risk towards reducing radiation cardiotoxicity.

Simulation CT Features and Radiation Cardiotoxicity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Radiation cardiotoxicity is a significant clinical dilemma in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiation therapy (RT). Baseline cardiovascular (CV) status may influence the risk of cardiotoxicity, and may be ascertainable from the appearance of the heart on simulation computed tomography (CT). We examined the association of CT features with incidental heart dose and risk of cardiac events in NSCLC.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients treated with curative-intent RT between 2015 and 2020 at a regional center were identified. Clinical notes were interrogated for baseline patient and CV health details, and follow-up CV events. Cardiac events were verified by a cardiologist. A deep learning-based auto-segmentation tool was applied, allowing extraction of a pre-specified list of volume parameters in a programming environment. CAC was graded as none, mild, moderate and severe in patients with a non-contrast scan. The craniocaudal relationship of the PTV and heart (Feng atlas) were annotated.

RESULTS

A total of 478 patients were included, with a median age of 70 and Charlson Index of 5. The median mean heart dose was 6.3 Gy (IQR 2.7-11.4). The median lung V20 was 20.0% (IQR 14.8-27.1). Cardiovascular risk factors were common, with most patients having 2 (39%) or 3 (31%). A history of previous cardiac events was common, including myocardial infarction (14%), arrhythmia (11%) or heart failure (9%). A total of 6.9% and 7.1% patients developed a new atrial arrhythmia (AA) or heart failure (HF) after completing RT. The volume metrics with the highest AUC for AA and HF events were the left atrium (LA) (AUC 0.67, p = 0.0002) and left ventricle:right ventricle (LV:RV) ratio (AUC 0.66, p = 0.0021). Kaplan-Meier analysis for cardiac events dichotomizing at the optimal cut-point for maximum sensitivity and specificity demonstrated significantly different rates for both AA (LA 109cc, HR 3.35, 95% CI 1.64-6.83, p = 0.0009) and HF (LV:RV ratio 1.61, HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.19-4.74, p = 0.0143). Only 2 patients with non-contrast scans developed a myocardial infarction, both had mild CAC. The incidence of pooled cardiac events was not significantly different between patients with no (n = 2/21, 9.5%), mild (n = 10/38, 26.3%), moderate (n = 8/53, 15.1%) and severe (n = 7/24, 29.2%) CAC (p = 0.3916). Where the inferior border of the PTV was above the superior border of the heart, mean heart dose was significantly lower than compared with overlap of levels (1.9 Gy v 9.7 Gy, p<0.0001), and this was true for 3DCRT (n = 139, p<0.001), IMRT (n = 94, p<0.001) and VMAT (n = 145, p<0.001) patients.

CONCLUSION

LA volume and LV:RV volume ratio are predictive for the development of AA and HF respectively. CAC grade did not differentiate patients by risk of cardiac events. Where the craniocaudal level of the PTV doesn't overlap with the level of the heart, the cardiac dose is likely to be very low. Several simulation CT features are associated with cardiac events following treatment for NSCLC and prospective evidence of cardiac risk could enable medical optimization prior to RT.

Patient-Level and Endpoint-Specific Clinico-Dosimetric Analysis of the Cardiac Base as a Mediator of Radiation Cardiotoxicity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Cardiac disease is a dose-limiting toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiation therapy. Radiation dose to the cardiac base is associated with poor overall survival in several clinical studies, but has not been validated in a non-dose escalated cohort, or with individual patient delineations. In this study we examined the impact of cardiac base dose on overall survival (OS) and cardiac events (CEs), and interrogated the relationships of the substructures comprising the heart base with OS and CEs.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with stage I-III NSCLC treated with curative-intent radiation therapy between 2015 and 2020 at a regional cancer center were identified. Clinical notes were examined for baseline patient, tumor and cardiac details, and both cancer and cardiac outcomes. Three cardiologists verified CEs. Cardiac delineations were completed using a validated deep learning-based autosegmentation tool. Cox and Fine and Gray regressions were undertaken for the risk of death and CEs respectively, accounting for pre-specified evidence-based dose metrics and clinically relevant cardiac covariates.

RESULTS

Most patients received 55 Gy/20# (n = 461/478, 96%) without chemotherapy (58%), planned with VMAT (51%) or IMRT (20%). Pre-existing cardiovascular morbidity was common, with 78% having ≥2 risk factors, and 46% having >1 established cardiac disease. The median follow-up was 21.1 months. Dichotomized at the median, higher heart base Dmax was associated with poorer survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (21.6 months (95% CI 19.3-24.9) versus 29.4 months (95% CI 21.6-36.6), p = 0.021), and remained significant when statistically compared in published multivariate models. In a multivariate analysis for pooled acute CEs, heart base Dmax was associated with CEs (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.04), but this was not the case for individual CEs. Using Fine and Gray models to account for the competing risk of death, left main coronary maximum dose was associated with atrial fibrillation (p = 0.024), proximal right coronary artery V15 (p = 0.023) and mean dose (p = 0.032), and the right atrium mean dose (p = 0.029) were associated with heart failure. No dose-volume metrics were significantly associated with acute coronary syndrome. None of the constituent base substructures dose were significantly associated with death.

CONCLUSION

Dose to the heart base was associated with increased mortality and an increased pooled cardiac event rate. Accounting for endpoint-specific clinical covariates, only select constituent substructures of the heart base were associated with CEs and no substructures were independently associated with survival. Together, these findings are suggestive of possible interplay between the constituent base substructures in their mediation of radiation cardiotoxicity.

UK 2022 Consensus on Normal Tissue Dose-Volume Constraints for Oligometastatic, Primary Lung and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the UK has expanded over the past decade, in part as the result of several UK clinical trials and a recent NHS England Commissioning through Evaluation programme. A UK SABR Consortium consensus for normal tissue constraints for SABR was published in 2017, based on the existing literature at the time. The published literature regarding SABR has increased in volume over the past 5 years and multiple UK centres are currently working to develop new SABR services. A review and update of the previous consensus is therefore appropriate and timely. It is hoped that this document will provide a useful resource to facilitate safe and consistent SABR practice.

Long-term Survival with 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-directed Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Synchronous Solitary Brain Metastasis

AIMS

At diagnosis, <1% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have synchronous solitary brain metastasis (SSBM). In prior cohorts without 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) staging, definitive treatment to intracranial and intrathoracic disease showed a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 11-21%. We investigated the long-term survival outcomes for patients with SSBM NSCLC, diagnosed in the FDG-PET/CT era and treated definitively with local therapies to both intracranial and intrathoracic sites of disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study assessed patients staged with FDG-PET/CT who received definitive lung and SSBM treatment from February 1999 to December 2017. A lung-molecular graded prognostic assessment (lung-molGPA) score was assigned for each patient using age, performance status score, and, where carried out, molecular status. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazard models determined OS and PFS prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC and SSBM had a median age of 63 years (range 34-76). The median follow-up of all patients was 3.9 years. Thirty-three patients (67%) had ≥T2 disease, 23 (47%) had ≥N2. At 2 years, 45% of first failures were intracranial only (95% confidence interval 30-59). At 3 and 5 years, OS was 45% (95% confidence interval 32-63) and 30% (95% confidence interval 18-51), respectively. In ≥N1 disease, 5-year OS was 34% (95% confidence interval 18-63). The 3- and 5-year PFS was 8% (95% confidence interval 3-22) and 0%, respectively. Higher lung-molGPA was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio 0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.61, P = 0.002). Higher lung-molGPA (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.71, P = 0.005) and lower N-stage (hazard ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.15, P = 0.007) were associated with longer PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive treatment of patients with NSCLC and SSBM staged with FDG-PET/CT can result in 5-year survivors, including those with ≥N1 disease.

Early circulating tumour DNA kinetics measured by ultra-deep next-generation sequencing during radical radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) from clinical blood samples, liquid biopsy, offers several diagnostic advantages compared with traditional tissue biopsy, such as shorter processing time, reduced patient risk and the opportunity to assess tumour heterogeneity. The historically poor sensitivity of ctDNA testing, has restricted its integration into routine clinical practice for non-metastatic disease. The early kinetics of ctDNA during radical radiotherapy for localised NSCLC have not been described with ultra-deep next generation sequencing previously.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with CT/PET-staged locally advanced, NSCLC prospectively consented to undergo serial venepuncture during the first week of radical radiotherapy alone. All patients received 55Gy in 20 fractions. Plasma samples were processed using the commercially available Roche AVENIO Expanded kit (Roche Sequencing Solutions, Pleasanton, CA, US) which targets 77 genes.

RESULTS

Tumour-specific mutations were found in all patients (1 in 3 patients; 2 in 1 patient, and 3 in 1 patient). The variant allele frequency of these mutations ranged from 0.05-3.35%. In 2 patients there was a transient increase in ctDNA levels at the 72 h timepoint compared to baseline. In all patients there was a non-significant decrease in ctDNA levels at the 7-day timepoint in comparison to baseline (p = 0.4627).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying ctDNA-optimised NGS protocols through specified time-points in a small homogenous cohort of patients with localised lung cancer treated with radiotherapy. Studies are required to assess ctDNA kinetics as a predictive biomarker in radiotherapy. Priming tumours for liquid biopsy using radiation warrants further exploration.

Radiotherapy Trial Set-up in the UK: Identifying Inefficiencies and Potential Solutions

AIMS

Radiotherapy clinical trials are integral to the development of new treatments to improve the outcomes of patients with cancer. A collaborative study by the National Cancer Research Institute Clinical and Translational Radiotherapy Research Working Group and the National Institute for Health Research was carried out to understand better if and why inefficiencies occur in the set-up of radiotherapy trials in the UK.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two online surveys collected information on the time taken for UK radiotherapy trials to reach key milestones during set-up and the research support currently being provided to radiotherapy centres to enable efficient clinical trial set-up. Semi-structured interviews with project managers and chief investigators identified better ways of working to improve trial set-up in the future.

RESULTS

The timelines for the set-up of 39 UK radiotherapy trials were captured in an online survey showing that the median time from grant approval to trial opening was 600 days (range 169-1172). There were 38 responses from radiotherapy centres to a survey asking about the current support provided for radiotherapy research. Most of these centres have more than one type of staff member dedicated to supporting radiotherapy research. The most frequent barrier to radiotherapy trial set-up identified was lack of physicists' time and lack of time for clinical oncologists to carry out research activities. Four main themes around trial set-up were identified from semi-structured interviews: the importance of communication and building relationships, the previous experience of the chief investigator and clinical trials units, a lack of resources and having the time and personnel required to produce trial documentation and to process trial approval requests.

CONCLUSIONS

This unique, collaborative project has provided up to date information about the current landscape of trial set-up and research support in the UK and identified several avenues on which to focus future efforts in order to support the excellent radiotherapy trial work carried out across the UK.

Introducing FDG PET/CT-guided chemoradiotherapy for stage III NSCLC in low- and middle-income countries: preliminary results from the IAEA PERTAIN trial

Purpose

Patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) continue to have a poor prognosis. It is known that FDG PET/CT improves staging, treatment selection and target volume delineation (TVD), and although its use has grown rapidly, it is still not widely available in LMIC. CRT is often used as sequential treatment, but is known to be more effective when given concurrently. The aim of the PERTAIN study was to assess the impact of introducing FDG PET/CT-guided concurrent CRT, supported by training and quality control (QC), on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with stage III NSCLC.

Methods

The study included patients with stage III NSCLC from nine medical centres in seven countries. A retrospective cohort was managed according to local practices between January 2010 and July 2014, which involved only optional diagnostic FDG PET/CT for staging (not for TVD), followed by sequential or concurrent CRT. A prospective cohort between August 2015 and October 2018 was treated according to the study protocol including FDG PET/CT in treatment position for staging and multimodal TVD followed by concurrent CRT by specialists trained in protocol-specific TVD and with TVD QC. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess OS and PFS in the retrospective and prospective cohorts.

Results

Guidelines for FDG PET/CT image acquisition and TVD were developed and published. All specialists involved in the PERTAIN study received training between June 2014 and May 2016. The PET/CT scanners used received EARL accreditation. In November 2018 a planned interim analysis was performed including 230 patients in the retrospective cohort with a median follow-up of 14 months and 128 patients in the prospective cohort, of whom 69 had a follow-up of at least 1 year. Using the Kaplan–Meier method, OS was significantly longer in the prospective cohort than in the retrospective cohort (23 vs. 14 months, p = 0.012). In addition, median PFS was significantly longer in the prospective cohort than in the retrospective cohort (17 vs. 11 months, p = 0.012).

Conclusion

In the PERTAIN study, the preliminary results indicate that introducing FDG PET/CT-guided concurrent CRT for patients with stage III NSCLC in LMIC resulted in a significant improvement in OS and PFS. The final study results based on complete data are expected in 2020.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04421-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Differential Relapse Patterns for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Subtypes Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Radiation Oncology

AIMS

Curative-intent (radical) radiotherapy aims to control local disease and cure non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The predominant subtypes of NSCLC are adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The radiotherapy paradigm offered to patients does not differ according to these two subtypes. Relapse patterns and disease control rates for adenocarcinoma and SCC treated with radical radiotherapy were determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A radical radiotherapy database covering the period from 2004 to June 2016 was examined to determine the first sites of relapse and the actuarial local and distant control rates.

RESULTS

In total, 537 patients with known pathological subtype were treated over the period. In 39 (7%), the site of first relapse was uncertain. Of the remainder, 203 (41%) had adenocarcinoma and 295 (59%) had SCC. At a median follow-up of 16.4 months, 58% had relapsed. There was a difference in relapse patterns (chi-squared test P < 0.0005), with a higher rate of first relapse locally in SCC (42% of all patients versus 24%) and a higher rate of first relapse in the brain for adenocarcinoma (14% versus 3%). The actuarial local control rate was worse for SCC (hazard ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.5-0.9, P = 0.002). The brain metastasis-free survival was worse for adenocarcinoma (hazard ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 2.2-7.5, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is a difference in relapse patterns between NSCLC histological subtypes, indicating that these are distinct entities. This may have implications for follow-up policy and strategies to improve disease control.

The Abscopal Effect of Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy: Fool's Gold or El Dorado?

An 'abscopal' effect if often used to refer to distant tumour regression after localised irradiation. Since the first report of the abscopal effect in the 1950s, well-documented cases with radiotherapy alone are very rare. It is widely accepted that the immune response plays an important role in the abscopal effect, although the mechanism is still unclear. With the recent success of cancer immunotherapy, there is growing interest in combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy to boost abscopal response rates. Compared with conventional radiotherapy, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) not only delivers ablative dose to the tumour, but may also induce robust immune responses. In this review we examine studies that combine SABR and immunotherapy. We review the preclinical rationale for SABR and immunotherapy combinations, the case for and against abscopal effects, and the current landscape of clinical trials.

UK Consensus on Normal Tissue Dose Constraints for Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Six UK studies investigating stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are currently open. Many of these involve the treatment of oligometastatic disease at different locations in the body. Members of all the trial management groups collaborated to generate a consensus document on appropriate organ at risk dose constraints. Values from existing but older reviews were updated using data from current studies. It is hoped that this unified approach will facilitate standardised implementation of SABR across the UK and will allow meaningful toxicity comparisons between SABR studies and internationally.

Cardiotoxicity Following Cancer Treatment

More than half of those born after 1960 will develop cancer during their lifetime. Fortunately, owing to improved diagnosis and treatment, cure rates have risen steadily over the last three decades. With an increased survivorship, more will experience adverse effects of cancer therapeutics on the heart. As the oncologist's focus begins to encompass the issues of cancer survivorship, awareness of the management of cardiac toxicity would be prudent for all physicians looking after patients with cancer.

The Challenges Faced in Developing Novel Drug Radiation Combinations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in the UK. Outcomes for patients with this disease remain poor and new strategies to treat this disease require investigation. One potential option is to combine novel agents with radiotherapy in clinical studies. Here we discuss some of the important issues to consider when combining novel agents with radiotherapy, together with potential solutions as discussed at a recent Clinical Translational Radiotherapy Group (CTRad) workshop.

Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy Combinations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Promising Future?

The goal of re-programming the host immune system to target malignancy with durable anti-tumour clinical responses has been speculated for decades. In the last decade such speculation has been transformed into reality with unprecedented and durable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors seen in solid tumours. This mini-review considers the mechanism of action of immune modulating agents and the potential for combination with radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

The Impact of Colleague Peer Review on the Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Process in the Radical Treatment of Lung Cancer

AIMS

Modern radiotherapy uses techniques to reliably identify tumour and reduce target volume margins. However, this can potentially lead to an increased risk of geographic miss. One source of error is the accuracy of target volume delineation (TVD). Colleague peer review (CPR) of all curative-intent lung cancer plans has been mandatory in our institution since May 2013. At least two clinical oncologists review plans, checking treatment paradigm, TVD, prescription dose tumour and critical organ tolerances. We report the impact of CPR in our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiotherapy treatment plans of all patients receiving radical radiotherapy were presented at weekly CPR meetings after their target volumes were reviewed and signed off by the treating consultant. All cases and any resultant change to TVD (including organs at risk) or treatment intent were recorded in our prospective CPR database. The impact of CPR over a 13 month period from May 2013 to June 2014 is reported.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two patients (63% non-small cell lung carcinoma, 17% small cell lung carcinoma and 20% 'clinical diagnosis') were analysed. On average, 3.2 cases were discussed per meeting (range 1-8). CPR resulted in a change in treatment paradigm in 3% (one patient proceeded to induction chemotherapy, two patients had high-dose palliative radiotherapy). Twenty-one (17%) had a change in TVD and one (1%) patient had a change in dose prescription. In total, 6% of patients had plan adjustment after review of dose volume histogram.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of CPR in our centre has resulted in a change in a component of the treatment plan for 27% of patients receiving curative-intent lung radiotherapy. We recommend CPR as a mandatory quality assurance step in the planning process of all radical lung plans.

Intraoperative radiotherapy in early stage breast cancer: potential indications and evidence to date

Following early results of recent studies of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in the adjuvant treatment of patients with early breast cancer, the clinical utility of IORT is a subject of much recent debate within the breast oncology community. This review describes the intraoperative techniques available, the potential indications and the evidence to date pertaining to local control and toxicity. We also discuss any implications for current practice and future research.

Optimizing geometric accuracy of four-dimensional CT scans acquired using the wall- and couch-mounted Varian® Real-time Position Management™ camera systems

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify sources of anatomical misrepresentation owing to the location of camera mounting, tumour motion velocity and image processing artefacts in order to optimize the four-dimensional CT (4DCT) scan protocol and improve geometrical-temporal accuracy.

METHODS

A phantom with an imaging insert was driven with a sinusoidal superior-inferior motion of varying amplitude and period for 4DCT scanning. The length of a high-density cube within the insert was measured using treatment planning software to determine the accuracy of its spatial representation. Scan parameters were varied, including the tube rotation period and the cine time between reconstructed images. A CT image quality phantom was used to measure various image quality signatures under the scan parameters tested.

RESULTS

No significant difference in spatial accuracy was found for 4DCT scans carried out using the wall- or couch-mounted camera for sinusoidal target motion. Greater spatial accuracy was found for 4DCT scans carried out using a tube rotation speed of 0.5 s rather than 1.0 s. The reduction in image quality when using a faster rotation speed was not enough to require an increase in patient dose.

CONCLUSION

The 4DCT accuracy may be increased by optimizing scan parameters, including choosing faster tube rotation speeds. Peak misidentification in the recorded breathing trace may lead to spatial artefacts, and this risk can be reduced by using a couch-mounted infrared camera.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study explicitly shows that 4DCT scan accuracy is improved by scanning with a faster CT tube rotation speed.

Investigating the potential impact of four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) on toxicity, outcomes and dose escalation for radical lung cancer radiotherapy

AIMS

To investigate the potential dosimetric and clinical benefits predicted by using four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) compared with 3DCT in the planning of radical radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients were planned using free breathing 4DCT then retrospectively delineated on three-dimensional helical scan sets (3DCT). Beam arrangement and total dose (55 Gy in 20 fractions) were matched for 3D and 4D plans. Plans were compared for differences in planning target volume (PTV) geometrics and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for organs at risk using dose volume histograms. Tumour control probability and NTCP were modelled using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model. This was compared with a predictive clinical algorithm (Maastro), which is based on patient characteristics, including: age, performance status, smoking history, lung function, tumour staging and concomitant chemotherapy, to predict survival and toxicity outcomes. Potential therapeutic gains were investigated by applying isotoxic dose escalation to both plans using constraints for mean lung dose (18 Gy), oesophageal maximum (70 Gy) and spinal cord maximum (48 Gy).

RESULTS

4DCT based plans had lower PTV volumes, a lower dose to organs at risk and lower predicted NTCP rates on LKB modelling (P < 0.006). The clinical algorithm showed no difference for predicted 2-year survival and dyspnoea rates between the groups, but did predict for lower oesophageal toxicity with 4DCT plans (P = 0.001). There was no correlation between LKB modelling and the clinical algorithm for lung toxicity or survival. Dose escalation was possible in 15/20 cases, with a mean increase in dose by a factor of 1.19 (10.45 Gy) using 4DCT compared with 3DCT plans.

CONCLUSIONS

4DCT can theoretically improve therapeutic ratio and dose escalation based on dosimetric parameters and mathematical modelling. However, when individual characteristics are incorporated, this gain may be less evident in terms of survival and dyspnoea rates. 4DCT allows potential for isotoxic dose escalation, which may lead to improved local control and better overall survival.

Unintended cardiac irradiation during left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac irradiation during left-sided breast radiotherapy may lead to deleterious cardiac side effects. Using image guided radiotherapy, it is possible to exclude the heart from treatment fields and monitor reproducibility of virtual simulation (VS) fields at treatment delivery using electronic portal imaging (EPI). Retrospectively, we evaluate the incidence of cardiac irradiation at VS and subsequent unintended cardiac irradiation during treatment.

METHODS

Patients receiving left-sided radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall, treated with a glancing photon field technique during a four-month period, were included. VS images and EPIs during radiotherapy delivery were visually assessed. The presence of any portion of the heart within the treatment field at VS or during treatment was recorded. Central lung distance and maximum heart distance were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 128 patients, 45 (35.1%) had any portion of the heart within the planned treatment field. Of these, inclusion of the heart was clinically unavoidable in 25 (55.6%). Of those with no heart included in the treatment fields at VS, 41 (49.4%) had presence of the heart as assessed on EPI during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Unintended cardiac irradiation during left-sided breast radiotherapy treatment occurs in a sizeable proportion of patients.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Despite the use of three-dimensional computed tomography simulation and cardiac shielding, sizeable proportions of patients receiving left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy have unintended cardiac irradiation.

Abstract P6-07-24: Prognostic Tools in Early Breast Cancer: Predicting benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy

Introduction: Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in early breast cancer reduces the risk of mortality. However, absolute reductions in mortality can be small. For patient with low risk disease, prognostic tools such as ‘Adjuvant! Online’ and ‘Predict’ can be used to estimate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. We compare the survival gains estimated using ‘Adjuvant! Online’ and ‘Predict’ in routine clinical practice, assessing the characteristics of patients in which ‘Adjuvant! Online’ and ‘Predict’ disagree.

Methods: In a retrospective study using the hospital electronic database, the clinical and pathological details of all patients with early breast cancer referred for adjuvant therapy at the Northern Ireland Cancer Centre in a 3 month period in 2011 were collected and were entered in to ‘Adjuvant! Online’ and ‘Predict’ to assess percentage benefit (absolute reduction in mortality at 10 years) from CT. We categorised patients into three prognostic groups: those where risk from CT outweighs benefit (&lt;2% predicted benefit), marginal benefit (2 to 5%) and significant benefit from CT (&gt;5%) We excluded patients with metastatic disease at presentation, DCIS, a second primary breast cancer or receiving neo-adjuvant treatment.

Results: Of the 250 patients identified, 61 (24.4%) fell in to different prognostic groups depending on whether ‘Adjuvant! Online’ or ‘Predict’ was used to calculate benefit from CT. In those in whom there was disagreement, ‘Adjuvant! Online’ suggested marginal or significant benefit in 75.4% of patients, compared to 55.7% using ‘Predict’. Nine patients had “major” comorbidities, which is weighted only in ‘Adjuvant! Online’, and were excluded in subsequent analysis. Of those without major comorbidities, ‘Adjuvant! Online’ offered at least 2% benefit in 85% of cases, and ‘Predict’ in only 58.3%. The majority (93.3%) of cases were ER positive, and node negative (85.0%). This difference was notable in women aged 65 or less, with 86.2% with &gt;2% benefit using ‘Adjuvant! Online’, compared to 55.1% using ‘Predict’. ‘Adjuvant! Online’ estimates of benefit were on average 3.7% higher for this age group. HER2 status had little impact, with similar recommendations using either ‘Adjuvant! Online’ or ‘Predict’.

Conclusions: This study highlights lack of concordance between two available online prognostic tools, notably in ER positive, node negative patients. For patients with a marginal benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, care must be used when making adjuvant treatment decisions as other prognostic tools may be of help in this group of patients.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-07-24.

Conventional 3D staging PET/CT in CT simulation for lung cancer: impact of rigid and deformable target volume alignments for radiotherapy treatment planning

OBJECTIVE

Positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans can improve target definition in radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As staging PET/CT scans are increasingly available, we evaluated different methods for co-registration of staging PET/CT data to radiotherapy simulation (RTP) scans.

METHODS

10 patients underwent staging PET/CT followed by RTP PET/CT. On both scans, gross tumour volumes (GTVs) were delineated using CT (GTV(CT)) and PET display settings. Four PET-based contours (manual delineation, two threshold methods and a source-to-background ratio method) were delineated. The CT component of the staging scan was co-registered using both rigid and deformable techniques to the CT component of RTP PET/CT. Subsequently rigid registration and deformation warps were used to transfer PET and CT contours from the staging scan to the RTP scan. Dice's similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to assess the registration accuracy of staging-based GTVs following both registration methods with the GTVs delineated on the RTP PET/CT scan.

RESULTS

When the GTV(CT) delineated on the staging scan after both rigid registration and deformation was compared with the GTV(CT)on the RTP scan, a significant improvement in overlap (registration) using deformation was observed (mean DSC 0.66 for rigid registration and 0.82 for deformable registration, p = 0.008). A similar comparison for PET contours revealed no significant improvement in overlap with the use of deformable registration.

CONCLUSIONS

No consistent improvements in similarity measures were observed when deformable registration was used for transferring PET-based contours from a staging PET/CT. This suggests that currently the use of rigid registration remains the most appropriate method for RTP in NSCLC.

Geometrical analysis of radiotherapy target volume delineation: a systematic review of reported comparison methods

Radiotherapy target volume definition is a critical step in the radiotherapy treatment planning process for all tumour sites. New technology may improve the identification of tumour from normal tissue for the purposes of target volume definition. In assessing the proffered benefits of new technologies, rigorous methods of comparison are necessary. A review of published studies was conducted using PubMed (National Library of Medicine) between 1 January 1995 and 1 January 2009 using predefined search terms. The frequency of usage of the various methods of geometrical comparison (simple volume assessment, centre of mass analysis, concordance index and volume edge analysis) was recorded. Sixty-three studies were identified, across a range of primary tumour sites. The most common method of target volume analysis was simple volume measurement; this was described in 84% of the papers analysed. The concordance index type analysis was described in 30%, the centre of mass analysis in 9.5% and the volume edge analysis in 4.8%. In reporting geometrical differences between target volumes no standard exists. However, to optimally describe geometrical changes in target volumes, simple volume change and a measure of positional change should be assessed.

Impact of socioeconomic status on treatment outcome in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer in Northern Ireland

e20531

Background: The survival advantage for combination chemotherapy in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is well documented. Epirubicin and cisplatin in combination with either 5FU (ECF) or capecitabine (ECX) result in response rates of 35–46% and a median survival of around 9 months in RCT. We report the impact of socioeconomic status on the outcome of ECF and ECX treatment in advanced gastroesophageal cancer patients in Northern Ireland between 2000 and 2007. Methods: All patients with advanced esophageal (O), gastric (G), or esophagogastric junction (OGJ) adenocarcinoma, receiving palliative chemotherapy from January 2000 to August 2007, were identified from our institutional database. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment details, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Patients receiving chemotherapy in a clinical trial were excluded. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Deprivation was assessed using the patient's home address deprivation index (DPI) (Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure 2005; May 2005. Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency. www.nisra.gov.uk ). Results: 274 eligible patients (m=200, f=74, O=114, OGJ=19, G=141) were identified. Median age was 62 years (range 22–83). 172 (62.8%) had ECOG performance status 0 or 1. 231 patients (84.3%) had metastatic disease, 43 (15.7%) had locally advanced disease. 216 (78.8%) patients received ECF and 58 (21.2%) patients received ECX. Overall median survival was 7.3 months. Treatment response and performance status were strong predictors of survival, however disease extent did not influence survival. Median survival was significantly longer in those with DPIs in the upper two quintiles than the lower 3 quintiles (9.5 months vs. 6.8 months, p=0.032). Conclusions: Outcomes achieved with palliative ECF/ECX treatment are similar to the reference clinical trials. Socioeconomic deprivation is significantly associated with reduced survival in this group of patients and is unrelated to disease extent at presentation; however it may be related to nutritional status and comorbidity and requires further investigation.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.